And of course, there's a regional element to that, but there's also just an individual preferences.
I might like SMS or the new like SMS, so I might engage more with SMS, push could be the same thing. Do personalized messaging. Don't just send out blast spam email all the time, send out messaging that's targeted to your audience to what they really want to hear. Companies that send less email actually have much higher conversion rates, much higher click through rates, and an offset, of course, the volume setters. Hello and welcome to the DDC podcast.
Today, my guest is Channing Fair, Chief Revenue Officer and CEO of the Americas at Brevo. Brevo is a customer engagement platform out of Paris with about 600,000 businesses on it. They just landed on the Inc. 5000 off of a 100% growth in the U.S.
Before this, Channing spent six years at HubSpot running sales strategy through the run from 200 million to 1.5 billion, and then ran sales at Semrush as well as Brandwatch back to growth.
โWelcome to the DDC podcast, Channing. How you doing?โ
I'm doing well. Thanks, Sarah, for having me. You have quite an epic SaaS career, and I know that you advised Brevo for a year and a half before you joined. What made it an attractive opportunity for you to jump to? Definitely. So, I had the fortunate opportunity, as you said, to do advisory work. In most times, you joined a new business. You don't have that chance to get under the hood a little bit ahead of time.
So, one of the things that there's multiple reasons, one of them was, first of all, I got to chance to know the product. And I felt really good about the product, knowing, of course, the Martek space very well from a variety of my prior experiences at HubSpot in Semrush and Brandwatch and elsewhere. So, I felt like we have a good product. Number one. Number two, I got to know the culture and the team culture. And it was very collaborative to me. That's a very important part of a good company culture's collaboration.
But intense as well, which I really appreciate too. So, that mix of intensity and collaboration, I liked a lot. And then, number three was, frankly, the challenge. And this was the thing that really was enticing. Where a European headquartered business, and we're trying to grow globally.
A lot of the teams I've run have been always very international, but I've always done it
from the headquarters here in the U.S. And this challenge was kind of doing something a little bit different where the headquarters were over in Europe. And I've got to help build the business globally, inclusive of building it in the U.S. And I thought that was a fun, interesting opportunity slash challenge.
โAnd how I see coming off a 100% growth in the U.S. How has that transfer been going from Europe into the U.S.?โ
Yeah, it's been good. It's, I will say, the U.S. market is a tough market. I mean, there's a lot of competitors. It's obviously a huge market, but also just highly competitive market. And the way people buy in the U.S. is a little different than the way people buy in Europe and even elsewhere in the world. I then do all of this, of course, when I joined. So, I'd say we're growing at a very good clip in the U.S. and globally we're growing at a good clip as well. But the U.S. is our fastest growing market right now.
One of the things that I think we realized very quickly as I was joining, and really as I was transitioning into joining, but, of course, being on the advisory board, I was able to have input on this, is we needed a different product mix. And the product mix for the U.S. and it really went beyond the U.S. but the product mix in the U.S. was too extreme. It was either a very low-end self-server or much more complex enterprise solution. We didn't have anything to set in the middle. And the middle to me was that sweet spot for us.
So, we launched our pro-offer that set between our enterprise and our standard product or self-server product. And the pro-offer is taking off, and that's been the thing that's really helped, I think, accelerate us for the U.S. market.
โI think that probably fits right in the D to C podcast market. Is that pro?โ
Yes, I think you're spot on. What's the main difference? What does it enable that the self-server doesn't? Yeah, so with pro, you're typically going to get a little, there's more capabilities, there's higher volume that you can send. From a capability standpoint, there are some lightweight CDP components built into pro. So, if you have some data integration that you want to do, which typically in business that's a little bit complex, but not highly complex, you do have different data sets that you might want to integrate to help
do more personalized marketing. We have some of those as a default built into pro. We have elements of enterprise, there's like flavors of enterprise, like custom objects, for example. You can use one custom object in pro, and that becomes very helpful as you might want to have a little variety of use cases there, but you might want to do one little custom thing, that custom object allows you to do it. Reporting, there's enhanced reporting, and that's another
big selling point in the pro offer. It is the significant enhanced reporting package that comes with pro versus the self-server offer. There's another reason people typically will shift over to the pro product. So, every SaaS platform I chat with is obviously integrating AI deeply into their tool set. How do users interact with AI and what's AI actually doing in the