S17 S2: The Creative Supply Chain Every Brand Needs (And Most Don't Have)

side of e-commerce, digital marketing, and building consumer brands.

I'm your host, Nick Sharma.

“I've spent the last nine years building, scaling, and investing in brands, and through”

this show in my weekly newsletter at Nick.co/email, I'm here to share everything I've learned. The wins, the losses, the experiments, the tactics, and the insights, also you can unlock your next $100,000 in revenue. Today's episode is a good one, but before we dive in, let me tell you about our chosen

sponsor for this week's episode. Here's the problem with most TV platforms. You'll only get access to about 20% of the inventory, which is the programmatic slice, and you can't measure it the same way that you measure meta. Tatari fixed both, direct publisher buys across linear and streaming, and, next-day attribution

against cack and row as, which is why 400 plus D to C brands like Manscape, Tacobas, and Chime, all run Tatari as a TV performance channel. You should see how they do it. Check out nik.co/tat-r-i, that's nick.co/Tatari. Welcome back to another episode of Limited Supply.

I'm your host, Nick Sharma, and today, today we're actually going to do something fun. So recently, when I recently, last week, I went to join a very large consumer brand, one of the biggest in the world, probably, about on their CMO off-site. So essentially, they're a global consumer brand. They bring CMOs from all over the world of their businesses.

They've got like a few sub brands. They bring them all to New York, and they're global CMO, basically hosts them here, and they have different people coming in. I was one of them. There was a couple other big agency CEOs I heard of, and essentially, they just kind of

talk through like, what is it that is the, what are the problems, what are the challenges, how our different markets working through them, what are some efficiencies they're finding in one another, and so going into this, I was a bit not nervous or anxious, but I was just like, I don't know if I have any of the chops to talk about what is going to be relevant for them, because they have a billion dollar spend budget per year.

I have never managed a billion dollar spend budget myself.

“I think maybe the largest spend of managed in a year might be close to a hundred, maybe”

200 million of total spend, but a billion dollars across one whole to co is pretty amazing. So you know, and I used to remember when I would meet with Moiz or hang with Moiz, he used to talk about how PNG's ad budgets were crazy, like they would have multi-billion dollar ad budgets, and for them it was less about where they're finding efficiencies. More so just like, how do we even spend a billion dollars?

I have no idea how you would even spend that, but what was interesting was that, you know, this company is absolutely massive, right? So the interesting thing is like, you know, even though they spend over a billion dollars on advertising, right, you hear something like that, and you just assume that their marketing problems must be completely different than the marketing problems you'd experience inside

a $10 million or a $50 million dollar a year brand, right?

They have more data, they have more agencies, they have more people, they have more distribution, they're global, they've got more brand awareness, they've got, you know, more money to test with, they've got more money to outcompete you in placements or for celebrities or

“out events, but the truth is like when we started talking, all the questions were pretty”

much the same, it was, how do we produce enough creative? Why does it take so long for us to build a landing page? How do we use creators more effectively? You know, how do we personalize life cycle marketing and make that more truly one-to-one? How do we measure brand work that doesn't fit cleanly into an attribution dashboard that we're using, right? And they're using the same attribution tools that we do in addition to maybe a couple of things

they build on their own. But for the most part, like when you're thinking MTA or MMM solutions, it's the same, same players that we talk about and see everywhere. You know, how do you use AI without adding another layer of chaos? And the interesting thing was that like the bottlenecks were pretty much all the same, even though the budgets could be wildly different, right? So I think fundamentally, everybody is still just competing for attention with,

with how AI has now sort of made its way into the world of consumer brands. It's also now that the the hard part of things, which we'll talk about later in this episode, but the hard things are now actually the easier things. And really one of the only variables that really matters is like how good are you at acquiring and, you know, holding attention so that whatever you're trying to do or say or sell is able to get across the board.

So being in this room, you know, definitely walking into it, I expected the conversations to be sophisticated to a level where I would feel at a place, like I thought we were going

and how they leverage that across different channels. Whatever, maybe I don't know why that was kind of like where my brain went. But then I met with some of the team and realized, you know, beforehand that like partnerships were something that, you know, they, they wanted to talk through or how to balance brand or where to lay off the pedal with performance and accelerate with brand and vice versa or how to show up at events and how to show

up and be culturally relevant. And then when I actually got to sit down with everybody, then it was like, I was like, wow, these, you guys have the same exact problems that everybody else has, which is essentially like, you know, this creative supply chain, the ability to produce and test assets, whether that's pages or adversarials or angles or stories, the ability to have reliable content coming in. So again, creative supply chain, but I'm also thinking

like outside of just, you know, designers or video editors or agencies. I'm also thinking like content creators and influencers and partnerships and, you know, showing up at a like a big event that cater to the same community or same audience. So anyways, I just thought it was interesting, right? Like the room was obviously the sum of the smartest marketers in the world. Now the problems were still the same. So I want to talk about scale. So scale,

you know, scale is like something everybody loves to mention and talk about and everything is like, we got to test it and then we got to scale it, right? Or we, we want to do this so we can get to scale. But I feel like, honestly, ever since jolly launched, I've had this perception that scale is actually, can sometimes be inefficient in the sense of like, you know, jolly operates with like two or three or four people, right? And there's tons of brands that we've heard of,

you know, instant hydration with Jordan, another amazing example, very, very lean team

willys, the THC beverage by the junshan guys, extremely lean. And, you know, it's kind of given me this new appreciation for not just like staying small and nimble, but the fact that scale

“doesn't need to mean you need to scale operations. Now in this case, scale is actually kind of required”

because they're multi-billion dollar a year revenue company. However, the scale does and, you know, they're the first ones to say, like it does add complexity, right? So if you're a small brand, your problem is not, your problem is the opposite basically. You don't have enough resources or you have too few, you don't have the budget, you may not even have the time to do it if you've got the budget, right? But at a giant company, your team may have too many resources or enough resources,

but too many dependencies. So, you know, when you want to launch a single test, you have to touch the strategy person, the brand person, the creative person, the copy person, the legal team, the product team, you know, web development, the analytics, the media team, maybe regional teams, maybe potential agencies, you know, and then final approvals down the road. And each of these might not just be like their GM or like the person who's leading it, but it also might be

parts of their team. Now, and somebody gets something or a team gets something, that also means they

“need like 24 hours, 48 hours sometimes to get back. So you can see how scale in this sense, right?”

You've got all these amazing teams built out and doing great work, but then when it comes to the

idea of like, all right, let's run a test, you know, you have too many handoffs and it's not that anybody is incompetent or is not able to actually do what the, what, you know, contribute in a positive way to what the end goal is. It's actually just that the handoffs is what adds time and information loss. And if you've ever played that game of telephone as a kid, you know that the more people you go through, right, the more the message gets distorted along the way. That is completely

true here in the case of, you know, going through approvals or going through different teams, right? The idea that you initially start with is likely to not be what the final end product is. And I've actually, I've seen this work a little bit, well, I've definitely seen it work where this has happened, right? You have so many teams, so many people. I remember at Schrammerbrandt's we'd work with companies that would have, you know, they'd have like a, a person fully dedicated

“full-time person just to SEO of product pages because that's how, you know, big their, their team was.”

And the problem was whenever we were trying to get something done, whether it's a new product page test or a homepage or like a, you know, used to build a bunch of these like holiday landing pages, which were essentially like, think collections pages made as landing pages for the purpose

of holiday merchandising. The problem is that when you have so many people involved, you know,

the, the message or like the intention, the goal of the page gets distorted by four, five, percent for every person it goes through. So by the time you go through like 20 people, you're pretty much at a completely different thing than what you may have initially started with. And that's because you have layers and layers of opinions and, you know, they're all objective

which is doing, I think, four billion dollars in revenue, but they're a global brand.

Their US team marketing team is literally four people. You know, with them, it's kind of the opposite. Like, oh, we have an idea for now granted. They're not doing their, they're mainly retail. So digital is actually not a huge concern for them. They're just starting to get into digital. But the reason I bring this up to contrast it is because their, their entire digital teams for people versus like maybe 40 or 400. And as a result, you know, when we want to build a landing page

to try, you know, doing something with paid social traffic or even leveraging like field marketing or retail based QR code scan traffic, we can go from the idea to a wireframe to assets and copy is is completed by the brand to developed by the development team the brand uses within a week. That's phenomenal because we have fewer hand-offs. So we have we just have more ability to move quicker. So yeah, you know, this, this reminds me that like it's not that these companies have

idea problems because also this brand specifically that I met with last week. I've enjoyed my conversation with every single person I've met from this company over the last like probably five or six or seven years. Not only do they have a good culture, but like they just have incredibly smart people. It's not that they have like an idea problem. It's more that they just need a faster path

for these good ideas to reach the market safely. So this brings me to the first operating metric

“that I think we need to be tracking better as, you know, marketing team leads or people within”

a marketing team, which is how long does it take us to learn something? And I'm not talking about learning a skill like Claude, but I'm talking more like, okay, we want to test something. We want to test if this angle works. How long does it take us to actually run that test from start to finish from idea being created to the test going live to then actually collecting a meaningful result. Right? There's so many things that can go into this when you think about it, you know, let's just

let's just come up with an idea here. So like let's say I'm selling gummies that help you, you know, it's like lactate gummies, right? So gummies you eat before you have something with dairy,

and it allows you to digest that dairy better. I don't take this. I'm not sure about the science,

but, you know, you get the point here. So now let's say you want to test this with an angle for, you know, either like a food that is commonly seen, maybe like pizza or vodka sauce pasta, and you want to hit a certain demographic, right? So like from coming up with the strategy behind, you know, what is the creative we're going to use, which by the way, if you haven't checked out this little repository that I use to save all my ads, which is ads.knit.co, ADS.nik.co.

I usually just use that and find gradents below there, because I just save all the ads.

“I like, but you should do the same highly recommended. It's so natural for us marketers to do”

just screen shot or save ads. We like, anyways, going back to this, right? Like, you've got the angle, you've got the product. Now it's like, okay, how long is it going to take us to actually test and understand if this work or not? Well, you have to come up with the idea. So I guess angle and product we have, right? Now it's like the strategy of how are we going to test this? Are we going to use static ads? Are we going to go film it, UGC? Static is probably the easiest,

right? So for thinking speed. So creative static ad start running it, you know, get it live, understand the metrics that are showing signs of promise, whether it's clicked through, whether it's actually showing immediate signals of purchase. And then, okay, if that's working well, let's validate it even further, right? Let's make a landing page entirely behind pizza pasta and butter chicken, for example, again, I'm just making this up. Now, how long does

“it take to do that, right? Because now you've got to build a landing page, you have to think through”

offers and price points and bundles, headlines, audiences, use cases objections, the formats, the product positioning, you know, any like campaign specific messaging. So this, this previously, this whole thing would take forever. The way I've been seeing brands use it now and the way that I've actually been starting to build pages myself, which is crazy to say because just two years ago, you know, we had hooks, which was a landing page agency with like 40, 50 people trying to pump out

pages at the speed of two weeks per page, right? I think our actual speed was something like four weeks per page, which is why that model just couldn't work. But now the question is, well, can we spend two hours and develop the landing page? Like does this angle deserve the two hours? Not does it require, you know, three weeks. So now you take that, right? The ability to get to this two hours point and you couple it with the idea of a scaled company, you can see where even still

And that was essentially something we talked about a lot, which is just like, how do you get faster and better and more efficient? And some of the things we talked about there were, you know, just better sharing of learnings, better updates to, you know, internal systems around the around the company, which they already do a pretty good job. They've got their own kind of systems around updating skills and marked down files and all of those things, very similar to

“what HQ does, if you've seen HQ or I think it's get indigo.ai as their site. But HQ basically”

allow, it's kind of like how drop box sinks across your whole company. Think drop box sink, but for all the skills, marked down files, memory that AI can leverage within your company for all your team members, which is pretty sick. Anyways, back to this, you know, the idea that you can now do this in two hours using Framer, right? If you've seen some of the biggest performance brands right now, they essentially use Framer to build their websites. And the way that they do this is you got to just

basically have a design system built out and ready to go for your agent that's building this to

reference. Me personally, I use either Cloud Code or I use Hermes. Ray lately, I've been using Hermes where I just created like a AI character. That is my editorial director or blogger rather and like this Framer site that I've built so far is basically her website. And so I will essentially use her to build out and design the site. We built out a brand book, a style guide. We, you know, basically go through and find what it is about other publisher sites that do so well from the

how they read to the style, to the margins on the side, to the fonts, to the font size, to where our buttons laid out, what are the colors we're using? You know, what's truly accessible, what drives the most engagement? Like we're basically creating the dream, you know, CMS, not CMS, but the dream kind of like theme that we're going to end up publishing a bunch of content on. You know, I don't actually know why I've gotten on such a tangent here, but I guess all that to say, Framer and whatever

“AI agent you're using. If you're not using it, you should 100% be using it, right?”

Okay, I told you about the benefits. Now here's what changed when their brand moved to TV advertising

using Tatari. When we first started purchasing TV, one of the things that was most important to us

was ensuring we were reaching the largest audience at the lowest possible cost. Using Tatari's dashboard, we were able to see a fishing traffic coming to the site and optimize word CPV on specific networks and publishers. We're now seeing about 40% more volume in our branded search and our branded search revenue by about 20%. Want the same head to nick.co/tatari to learn more? That's nik.co/tatari. Okay, so now another thing I want to talk about that came up a lot is basically that growth

is almost now just a game of angles, right? It's not necessarily just about being able to spend

“online because now there's so much content online. If you're not using angles or headlines or”

I mean, obviously everybody's using headlines. But you know what I mean with angles, like really provocative things that kind of break through just the slop of content that's in the feed and kind of like get you to be noticed, right? Engels are essentially what is winning. So if you look at the fastest growing brands online, whether it was five years ago, 10 years ago or today,

it's always the same ones. It's the ones that are using crazy angles to explain the product

and basically take one product and sell it to 100 different customers for 100 different reasons at the same time. And you know, we see that happen in a few different channels. One, it happens on paid social, which is the obvious one, right? The ads to the landing pages. The other place that happens a lot, which is where a lot of brands are actually understanding what to even test or that they should be pursuing the single on paid social is organic social. And that's

happening in two ways. One is it's happening in the creator world, right? So either there's the creator world, there's the there's the creators that are like paid as influencers. There's the creators that are paid as affiliates. And there's the creators who are just getting product seeded to them in order to post and talk about what they're like, what they just unboxed and et cetera, et cetera. Now, if these creators are not given strict briefs on what to say and the product is universally

able to be understood and they can kind of figure out like how they use the product in their life,

shoot you with real angles, real stories. And you know, whichever one basically does well from an

engagement standpoint, that's now a new angle that you run because you figured out it finds micro audience. That's new. The other way to test it is your own organic social. So whether you're running, you know, TikTok or YouTube shorts or Instagram reels, right? Those are all places to put up many pieces of content and just test what works. And, you know, based on engagement, you'll know which angles have better chance of hitting than others. Obviously, this piece, right,

being able to actually throw up content, also requires that if you're going to be able to test

“that your angles are legit, you have to also be good at putting up content because if you have”

good angles, but horrible content, it's going to give you a bad read on what you're trying to see. And then the other place that I think this happens a lot is in the world of life cycle marketing. And this is something that's coming. It's on its way. It's not fully there yet. You know, we've definitely talked about companies that exist where you can basically, you know, do insanely personalized email one to one based on website behavior, website triggers what,

you know, a third party company might have in their database about you. We've also talked about things like outer signal where you can literally see who is actually coming to your site. And maybe even based on that, you figure out more angles or more reasons of why you would sell the product. There was even just another company this morning. I think it was hexclad. They're creating either a new product or bundle or launching something, or maybe it was even just

launching a test, but it's based on outer signal data, just understanding the personas and the

“cohorts that are coming in, which I think is sweet. And you know, more people are going to do that.”

But anyways, organic social creators paid social, obviously. Advertorials, if you're not already doing that, advertorials and listicles are now as easy to set up and test with angles as static ads because of things like framer or manus, right? And then life cycle. The last thing about life cycle, I'm going to say is I truly feel like life cycle marketing is kind of taking a back seat this year if I'm being honest. I think everybody's trying to understand

and figure out like what is the acquisition, what is the crack around acquisition, which generally

is always the thing that is prioritized, but people are obsessed with acquisition this year and

not as much with retention or life cycle marketing or building out LTV or reducing churn or increasing subscription. And my hunch is that based on what is happening with AI and where things are headed

“and what is going to be possible with API keys and MCPs and you know, players like PostScript”

trying to get into the world of email now, retention is going to take, retention is going to be especially like personalized retention and personalized life cycle marketing and personalized email campaigns are all going to be a legit thing because you're going to be able to create almost like writers, agentic writers for different personas or for different reasons and right a ton of emails at once and send them out and you can have the black Friday campaign go

out to, you know, 400,000 people on your list, but maybe there's actually like 5,000 different variants of that black Friday email that go out based on what you know people will click and their shopping patterns and who they are and the persona data that you have from outer signal. So, you know, all that to say that that's just again, I keep going on these tangents, but all that to say that this idea of angles is not going anywhere, okay? I've been talking about angles

for years now and it's still the number one or two or three thing that everybody needs to talk about or think about or focus on because the angles is how you get to the point where your stuff starts to grow and that too specifically where, I mean, like if you just look at iamate or a grooms or any of these other ones instant hydration, you know, absorption company, any of these companies that are ripping online, it's all just because they're testing, you know, 50 to 250

angles per month and out of that, maybe 10 to 15 of them end up with landing pages and out of that, maybe 5 or 6 are ones that really become, you know, they move over to their like evergreen campaigns as all right, this is working, we're going to keep this running, et cetera, et cetera. Okay, now, if you can't, if you feel like you can't name what angles you're testing, you've got a problem that you probably need to solve or just rethink what you're doing because

the problem is when you're not deliberately testing angles or intentionally trying to see,

okay, does this creative, which maps to this angle, is this hitting it and is this doing what it's supposed to do? The problem is you're just spraying and praying and you're kind of playing this

happens. Whereas today, I think you need to be a lot more deliberate with the angle or the

intention behind that ad, who are you trying to hit? What are you trying to make them feel and have multiple variations of that, right? It's not just one ad with a hundred different variations. All right, now we're running up on time here. So the last thing I want to talk about for today's episode, and I think what I'll do is just continue this in the next week is the creative supply chain. So, you know, before it was all about like the creative calendar or the promotional calendar, right?

You had a couple of shoots a year maybe, that was like standard, I'd say probably once a quarter, once every six months, either those were like what you would normally do. It would either be with like a studio, you know, like Wonder Kingdom Austin, or it's with freelance photographer maybe, or it's with like a Suna, and now maybe, you know, you're using Kive and Higgs field to generate

“some more assets that look real, but they're made with AI. And the truth is, this is now,”

like creative is now not just a, it's not just a team, right? It's not just like a, a function. It is now probably 80% of the operation. So, your creative supply chain probably has a ton of inputs. You've got internal designers, internal editors, you've got static ad production, you've got customer UGC, you've got seated content creators, you've got paid creators, you've got affiliate partners, you've got whitelisted content, you've got celebrity partnerships, you've got maybe founder content

if you're doing that. You've got expert content, so think like, you know, a nurse or a nutritionist, talking about a wellness brand, you've got these, you know, if you're using AI, you've got different AI formats, like hand drawn things or low-fi formats that are easy to replicate when you find a format that works, you've got reviews, that customers leave, you've got support questions, that customers leave, you've got search queries from your website that, you know, if you've got

“long, long-tail search queries, either from your site or AEO, you can turn that into this,”

you've got Reddit and community language, you've got existing assets that if you still have the rights to, can be recut, you've got hopefully retail placements or event content, and then you've got, of course, like the organic social things that win. Now, the full chain and

kind of the way that I like to think about it is basically, first you source ideas, so, you know,

using reviews, your comments or customer service inquiries, or what creators are talking about, which I've mentioned, Sephora does a phenomenal job of this, where they ask, you know, they sit down with their creators every quarter I think, or every six months, and basically ask them, what are your people asking you? So, creators as a, as a sourcing idea, the search, the competitor gap, support tickets, right? Then you turn these into briefs or potential angles you can test, right?

So, you think about the audience, you think about the angle, the hook, what's the proof behind it? What kind of format is this creative or visual going to be, and what's your CTA?

“Then you have to produce the assets. So, you've got this, this is kind of the supply chain, right?”

You've got internal people you can use, maybe internal designers or editors, then you've got creators who are external, so these are people who maybe have a following, maybe they don't, maybe they're just really good at creating content, they do that on a retainer, you've got agency's maybe, you've got actual customers who are sending you content, and then you've got your AI world of things, which this might have five or six or seven or eight different formats of content in

itself, and we're getting very close to a point where your video editors are either going to be using AI or you'll be able to train skill of how to best cut your UGC videos based on what you know performs, and then input video and get the output of actual cut stuff. Then you've got to obviously secure the rights and usage, and then you create variants, so you look at what you've got so far. You might want to create more hooks or more angles or different crops or add some overlays depending

on the placement, and then you test it, so you test it across different pages, you might have access to whitelist, different channels, different audiences, and different offers. Although, I should probably say that that might be too much testing. You might just want to actually test it against the angle and the audience you think is going to work. Either using one or two

different types of pages, I always recommend launching stuff with a whitelisted page and your

internal brand page. The whitelisted page obviously gets way better economics when you think of that click through where's TPM, and then you want to make sure you understand the learnings. So what actually earned attention? What created buyer intent? What drove a new conversion? And then you know, what just looked good, but didn't really perform. And then from there, you can take those winners and the learnings and then feed it right back into this whole loop. So you go right back to

the top where you go right back to source ideas, but now you've got learnings to add into there.

we should probably just do an episode on this because I've been doing this for a few brands now,

but like how do you build a sustainable always on repeatable supply chain? And the reason I

call it supply chain is because like it's not just one track, right? You've got like seven or eight or nine tracks of production that are all then feeding into your, you know, where you're buying

“media. So that's why I think of it more like a supply chain. There's a lot of moving parts.”

And like I said, this is kind of this is the number one problem. I hear across the board from

anybody. All right. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to actually put together a creative supply chain that maybe not deck, but like a definitely an episode probably a newsletter and maybe something to

“help you kind of build this on your own because I've been building it for a few different companies”

and it's been working swimmingly. Like we've been able to really increase the output of testing,

finding winners, and also just being able to have a nice variety of creative across the board. So stay tuned for that. Thanks for joining me on today's episode, which I feel like was just a

“big rant. I'm also in our office today where the AC's broken and I'm in like the little phone booth.”

So it's even warmer in here. I feel like I'm in a sauna. But I hope today's episode was helpful and I can't wait to dive in either of the rest of these points or on that creative supply chain on the next episode. Have a great week and I'll see you next time. Thanks for listening. We'll be back next time to cut through the noise on CPG, retail, and e-commerce. If you enjoyed this episode, why not share it with a friend and be sure to

subscribe wherever you listen, so you don't miss the next one.