This is our first episode of Two of Me, Connor Cody, live in New York.
Today, we are with Nick Kettkar, who's a director of product management at Meda. We go super deep on what the future of automation looks like at Meda, building connected systems, and how marketers can future proof their programs today. We're excited you're listening. Thanks for joining.
We are here at the Meda office with Nick Kettkar. One of the things I want to start with here is we've talked at length. We've been hundreds of hours on this content basically on how media buying has changed over the last couple of years and how historically when Cody Connor and I really started, there's a lot of value to create, you know, setting up the ad account, doing very manual
lever buying within the ad account, and it feels as if Meda is moving towards a more sort of
autonomous, automated, connected system. But I would love to hear your perspective and your experience at Meda and how you guys are thinking about that shift for media buyers.
“So yeah, let's talk about it over the last few years, right?”
I think for media buyers for a lot of what they did previously, you can think of it as equal parts, executionally oriented tasks, campaigns set up, how do I get the structure right, what should my campaign configuration be, what should my ad sets be, what ads do I need? So there's a lot of what level should I use, how should I think about budgets, how do I think about audience, so a lot of it was executionally operational in nature about 50% at least.
And I would say the other 50% was very strategic and directional, like how should be build up, how should we be thinking about our campaign, where do we want to go, what are the right signals, what are the right metrics, how do I keep optimizing those metrics, and so does like think of it as 50/50. What we wanted to do with the last few years and I think we have done pretty successfully, but the advantage plus is take away some of these operational burdens away from
our ad sets, so we want to make it very simple for them to be able to create a performant campaign without a lot of set up tax and that was kind of the intent behind banish plus,
“that's where we've been going over the last few years, I think last year we rolled out a project”
which we call the unification internally, but it makes it very, very easy for folks to use advantage plus products as the default option, and of course it doesn't deco any of the controls, they can still go and interact with the controls that they need, but it's simple enough if you don't need those controls, and I think in the future where they're going to go eventually, is the ratio is going to eventually more completely towards hopefully, where media buyers are spending
100% of that time on the strategic tasks, more about direction, how do I give you guys the how do I give met other right inputs about their goals, about their constraints, about their creative direction, brand needs, voice tone, all of that good stuff, and so that's where we see it about 100% so I wanted to sort of unpack as I was doing research for this episode and this idea of like connected systems, you brought up advantage plus as one example of maybe what you would consider
connected system, I'm curious if there are any others that maybe advertisers are working with today, where you guys as, you know, the meta product team, think, they're good examples of where the platform is going. A lot of the products that you can you can think of as any place where you're adding any sort of input is going to be a connected system in the future. Value rules are really good example, value optimizations, for example, because you're sending us signals in some
four, catalog is a good example of precisely this particular connected system, because even if it does feel a little discrete today, the idea is we can use all of the data in the future to connect all of these different different levels and give advertisers one sort of solution, and so I think those are all examples that come to mind of course advantage plus being the easiest example for media companies because it was focused specifically on solving the problem that you're speaking
off which is a connected system. But I think all of these products eventually are going to come together under one system. And my understanding is these connected systems where we're inputting certain goals and, you know, expressing certain values allow meta to over time begin optimizing for like more nuanced situations. Maybe like containing two goals at once, can you speak a little bit to that? Can you give an example of it advantage plus campaign but it's
just to pick on a product right? As long as an average of a few weeks ago and they're an apparel seller, a focus on variations of t-shirts, those t-shirts are all very similarly priced. They use advantage plus campaign budget today, works extremely well for them because under one campaign many different assets, each being a variation, they able to let the system
do what it does and they get amazing performance, both wonderfully well. Now where would it not work
cut, it is an example? Where would not work currently is an example where the average order value between those products is very different. The goals may be more nuanced. You could have differences in inventory, skews between those products and you could have very specific budget limitations for that. You could say hey, I'm selling stocks and shoes, very different margins,
“very different products and I want to be able to express to you how you should operate for those”
two very distant products. And that type of nuanced signal, we cannot capture today's yet,