Why the Pentagon Is Hiring Wall Street Bankers

The US stock market started history's greatest wave of wealth creation.

“From factory workers and Detroit to farmers in Omaha,”

anyone could want a piece of the great American companies. But today, our most innovative companies are staying private longer, which means everyday Americans are missing out until now. Introducing VCX, a public ticker for private tech. Visit getVCX.com for more info.

That's getVCX.com. Carefully considering investment materials before investing, including objectives, risk charges and expenses, this and other information can be found in the funds perspective at getVCX.com. This is a paid sponsorship. Support for the show comes from hosting.

You might dream about launching the next big thing one day, but with hosting a, you can turn that one day into day one. Hosting a is an all-in-one platform that brings everything into one place. Your domain, website, email marketing, AI tools and AI agents.

And you can go live in minutes, not weeks. Go to hostinga.com/theprofty to bring your idea online for under $3 a month. Plus, get an extra 20% off with promo code TheProfty. That's less than the price of a cup of coffee per month. That is hostinga.com/theprofty.

promo code TheProfty for an extra 20% off. If you're tired of database limitations and architectures that break when you scale, it's time to think outside rows and columns. MongoDB is the database built for developers by developers. It's asset compliant, enterprise ready, and fluent with AI.

“That's why so many of the Fortune 500 trust MongoDB”

with their most critical workloads.

And the best part is developers swear by it. Literally, we can't use the actual words they said in this ad. So let's just call it a really great database. Ready to think outside rows and columns. Start building faster at MongoDB.com/build.

Today's number four. That's how many Oscar nominations Timothy Schaleme has received. However, he has still never won. Today's other number is 100,000. That's how many ballerina's celebrated on Sunday night.

Welcome to Profty Markets. I'm Adelson. It is March 17. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices climbed as Trump called on other nations to help secure traffic through the

street of Homus, oil prices declined on that news. The yield on tenure treasuries also fell, and the dollar dropped the most in more than a month. Okay, what else is happening? The Pentagon is seeking unusual hires. Specifically Wall Street Bankers.

The defense department is recruiting investment bankers for a new 30-person economic defense unit. The team would be tasked with identifying strategic investment opportunities

and deploying as much as $200 billion over the next three years.

And the money would be directed towards sectors considered vital to national security, including mineral extraction, drones, and energy. According to the government's presentation, the goal is to prevent China from gaining military superiority. To lower top talent, the Pentagon is offering high salaries,

access to foreign contacts, and the chance to manage, quote, "more capital than most investors deploy in their entire careers." Here to discuss this is the journalist who broke this story. Liz Hoffman, Semaphore's business, and finance editor, and host of compound interest. Liz, welcome back to Prophecy Market's first tell us what do we know about this new

“investment banking recruiting operation that Trump has initiated here?”

What is interesting or striking to you about it? Yeah, I mean, through the military budget, through these trade deals that the Trump administration has been striking with foreign countries, and with a bunch of other things that they're working on to kind of as the Treasury Secretary calls it kind of monetized the national balance sheet.

You know, the Trump administration is going to end up with a couple hundred billion dollars,

maybe more than a trillion dollars, kind of to invest and has a lot of ideas kind of about its priorities, but it's now just going to be finding things to buy and invest in, and it's one thing to say, we'll just take 10% stake in Intel, pretty well-known company, pretty important to national security, but there's a long tale of things that they're going to want to go after and finding those deals is what Wall Street and Justin Becker's do for a living. They are explicitly hiring what in Wall Street

is called coverage bankers, and every industry has them, so you might be a coverage banker covering industrial companies or energy companies or retailers, and there are coverage bankers

world, and their job is to know what these guys own, what they might be willing to sell, and then

to try to find the money to put those deals together. So that's the unit that's being put together here, and as you correctly know, it is the Pentagon correctly dangles. This is a jaw-dropping amount of money and can be a very fun playground for Wall Street investors and judging by kind of the

“inbound that I receive saying who do I call to get the job, it is a fairly juicy opportunity I think.”

And so what is actually the point of this? It's for the US government to continue to buy up stakes in private company, and I mean is that essentially what is happening here? I think so. I mean, we published what we know, so I've been calling around and not got in a lot more detail, but I think that's the idea. I mean, the government through the defense department and the Department of Commerce probably have stakes in 12 or 15 private companies right now,

and you know, they are a way to ensure domestic supply of really important things. They can be a way to provide financing that for whatever reason the private sector won't, you know, there's sort of early-stage mining things that are pretty hard to finance that the government might say, yeah, we'll do that. And then they are obviously politically, I think the Donald Trump really likes doing deals, and huge parts of the government have kind of retrofitted themselves and huge parts of the corporate

world too, kind of retrofitted themselves around satisfying that impulse. What do you make of the crossover here that was seen between the public sector and the private sector, which is usually the kind of thing that people are worried that socialists or a communist would be responsible for this idea that we will go in and seize the means. We will buy up stakes in private companies. Now we own the private company. Now we control it. We're going to have golden shares in US steel

to give government more control. And now the plan is to deploy $200 billion pay these bankers, huge amounts of money to essentially, I don't think I'm saying this incorrectly, give the US government

control of critical infrastructure and private companies that have historically been owned by

the private sector. Yeah, I should say sadly, I did not see an employment term sheet for this, this job. Right. But I guess it's actually probably not going to pay them huge sums of money. You know, and again, I'm not a lawyer. This is not legal advice, but I do think that if you go into government for a term or service, you can sell a lot of your stock on a tax deferred basis, which is very attractive to these people. And then the other thing they're dangling is you will

make connections in government that you can then turn around and go back to the private sector and monetize. So my guess is that this is probably not hugely expensive for the taxpayer on the personnel side. I mean, to concern you have in this situation, if you go back, was it 15 years to the Obama administration. There was a deal that they did to the department of energy. They launched money to a company called Solindra. It was a green energy company and it

fell down and it became just an albatross around the neck of the Obama administration. And the lesson out of that, which is sort of a textbook lesson, which is that you don't want government picking winners and losers because it's not very good at it. And be even if it is good at it, like to whom does that benefit accrues? It's not clear that if they buy, by the way, they're up on their stake in Intel. I'm not getting a check as a taxpayer. I don't know, right? And so you

have to think about what you're trying to solve for. And so generally it's the places where you might be able to justify it, sort of in a more academic setting, it's things that for whatever reason the market just isn't willing to finance. No, the government has lots of ways to help that happen

“anyway. I think about like no one would build missile systems if the Pentagon didn't have a huge”

contract to buy them, right? They, you know, the government spends money in ways that make things financeable. So I don't know, you know, and I talked to some folks about this. As far as this

interesting to you, and the answer is, yeah, it sounds fun. But you do have to worry about adverse

selection. And the other thing I would note is that private equity firms are sitting on an epic historic backlog of companies that they have been unable to sell, like something like three or four trillion dollars worth of stuff sitting in their portfolio is because the IPO market has been sluggish the particularly considering M&A have been sluggish. And they are desperate to offload this to somebody. Right. And you have to worry a little bit if you're the Pentagon that you become the dumb

money here. And bringing in people who speak that language should probably help with that, I guess. Right. And ultimately those investments, I mean, you mentioned that the taxpayers probably are paying the salaries of the bankers. But if we're deploying two billion dollars of capital from the treasure, and that's taxpayers' money, or at least that's going to be funded by deficit spending,

“that's what's going to fund the investments in these companies ultimately. Is that right?”

It certainly is. And I guess on the front end, it's not totally clear to me where the money is

may have some money for this. You know, the Trump administration looks at these trade deals

they're doing with Japan and Korea and Taiwan and saying it's another couple hundred billion dollars.

That will likely get funneled through commerce and not the defense department. I don't really know I mean, I don't think the ideal outcome here is to have a profitable kind of constantly fundraising self-sustaining private equity firm inside the Pentagon. But the other thing I should know, by the way, is that, you know, the Undersecretary of the Pentagon came from private equities, the former CEO of a co-founder of Cerberus. And there has been this really interesting tension actually inside the

Pentagon between sort of two warring factions in finance and on Wall Street and what one is private equity. And what is Cerberus Silicon Valley Venture, which has been playing a huge role in the defense department and procurement. It actually since he very graciously mentioned, we do have a new podcast at our episode coming out Tuesday is with the partnered Andrews and Horowitz, who's been running their kind of America first investments. And we talked a lot about why Venture

Capital, which has this kind of very capital-light code DNA, like why is it playing these like bombs and drones and really heavy capex businesses. And so there's a little bit of tension inside the Pentagon about this. And I think that their requests specifically for private equity Wall Street's are really died in the wall. Wall Street finance guys is probably, you know, telling to definitely Undersecretary Fineberg's personal experience. Well, it does seem that if you're

in the investing game, if you're in Silicon Valley and then you learn that we're going to see

200 billion dollars in capital inflows basically overnight because of what Trump has decided to do,

you probably should get to investing in these companies. I mean, $50 billion invested in defense tech in in the whole of last year. Now we've got $200 billion in the pipeline coming from the

“government alone. You have to think that this is a great time to be a defense tech company. And then”

on top of that, something that I also just wanted to bring up to you and see what you see what you make of it. Trump's sons, Don Jr. and Eric, they recently invested in a drone company who's customers or one of his one of its largest customers is the Pentagon, this company called Paris, which they're now working on taking public. I read this headline, I really read this news that you reported here that we're now planning to have $200 billion deployed at the direction of

Trump that's going to go into defense companies, into defense tech companies, specifically drone companies, and it makes me think, well, is this money just going to go into the pockets of his sons? I do not have a good answer for you on that, and I do not know what level of outrage that would that would spark, my guess is, like, some for some period of time, and then, like everything else, it would kind of just be absorbed into the ether. Yeah, you know, it's interesting. We had a

story a couple of months ago, actually, my colleague Rachel Jones wrote this great story about companies, sort of particularly looking to go public via SPACs and kind of twist themselves into,

basically show a little leg for the Trump administration trying, in fact, to get the government

to buy 5% or 10% of their company. The other thing you got to wonder is, like, a lot of these stakes are just kind of being given, right? It's not totally clear what the economics are, and the Intel stake, this was money that was had already been authorized to be granted, mostly, or lent, mostly granted to Intel, under the Chips Act, and the Biden administration, and, you know, Trump's cover secretary Howard, let me came along and say, "Well, what are we getting for that?"

“And I got 10% of the company, so stocks up. And that actually, I think, a sort of a textbook”

example of something, I was a little skeptical of that on the way in, but it seems to have marshaled private money followed, right? You know, a government money is good when it sort of sets a floor under something and encourages the private sector to take the first steps and then kind of do it, it's due diligence, which obviously the market does on until every day, so. Do you think this is the first step on the path towards a sovereign wealth fund in America? I do, and, you know,

my personal view is that we don't need one, like countries that have sovereign wealth funds, they have them because they don't have all of the things that we have, which is like a really thriving private sector, and a lot of very dynamic price discovery, and what they do have is, like, a lot of oil. And usually a big pile of money that they can rely on versus a giant pilot debt. Correct. Correct. And it doesn't usually end that well, because they tend to entrench, you know,

strongman and other other things. But I do think that if you look at, again, you've got money coming in from trade deals. We'll see how real that is, but the Japanese seems serious about

“about it. I think there's a meeting this week between the US and South Korean officials kind of hammer”

that that one out. You don't have a lot of money coming in on trade deals. You've got, whatever they get to keep on the tariffs, you've got whatever they raise by taking Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public, you know, they're stock of privatizing the postal service. Like, I don't know exactly, but there are these national assets and, and Treasurer's secretary Scott Bessent has talked about

the grand canyon or naming rights to Mount Rushmore or whatever, but you can start to see these

“piles of money. There's a $10 billion fee, apparently coming to the US government from the Tiktok”

deal, story in the Wall Street Journal the other day. So you start to put these things together and it's a trillion dollars, which is the size of the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world, which depending on the day is either at the Xatari Arabia or Norway. So I don't know. Again, I don't think that we need one because those exist generally to do things that the market does pretty efficiently here. But Donald Trump obviously wants one and so you're starting to see

the pieces get put together, whether it gets like organized in some cohesive fashion, I don't know it may end up being a bit of a tug of war between the defense department and commerce and some various other agencies. Yeah, it seems like you like the sound of it and that's really what must see it, or at least that's my duty. It's just really operating for instance. Okay, let's

Hoffman's Semaphores Business and Finance at a certain host of compound interest, Liz, thank you very much. Next, I'd always pleasure.

The Trump administration collects their Tiktok bag and for even more markets insights you can subscribe to my weekly newsletter simply put at simply put.proftgmedia.com. Support for the show comes from sofa. To stay ahead in this economy, your number one priority should be staying on top of your finances. With inflation and market shifts, you can't afford to be

“passive. You need to be proactive about where every dollar is going. And part of that is having”

a bank that actually works for you and are so far. So five plus is a premium membership. A smart way to get more for your money. So five plus is packed with benefits and unlock a thousand or more an annual value with qualifying activities. Values including a competitive APR on savings and investment match for your IRA and access to one-on-one sessions with sofa wealth financial planners. You can get started for $10 a month. And if you join so five plus between now and April 15th,

you'll have a chance to win over $75,000 in cash. Sofai is also giving 20 individuals $1,000 in cash prices and 50 winners, free sofai plus membership's for a year. Head to sofa.com/scotchy to enter. Terms and conditions apply. To learn more about sofai plus, head to sofai.com/sofai-highfin plus. Support for the show comes from BMC. Before you trust AI to make your business decisions,

“before you can reliably scale automation across every workflow. Before all your data pipelines are”

connected with intelligence, your business faces some complex challenges ahead. Namely, tackling things like orchestration as a competitive advantage, unifying your modern and legacy systems, or transforming your mainframe. Before you take them on, make sure you do one thing. BMC first. BMC is the automation engine for the AI era. Over the years, they've helped customers worldwide run and modernize their businesses by

automating, managing, and optimizing complex IT environments. They've partnered with 80% of the Forbes global 100. Before automation, before scale, before transformation, before you begin, BMC first. What can you do when you partner with BMC? Get started today. Learn more at BMC.com. We're back with Profty Markets. The Trump administration is set to collect one of the

largest MNA fees in history. The government will reportedly pocket $10 billion for brokering

the TikTok deal. That fee will be paid by the investors who took control of TikTok's U.S. operations, including Oracle, MGX and Silver Lake. The group has already put $2.5 billion into the U.S. Treasury when the deal closed in January. Further payments will follow until the total hits $10 billion to put that into perspective. The biggest MNA fee ever disclosed went to Bank of America for advising Norfolk Southern on its sale to Union Pacific last year.

The total fee for that transaction was $130 million. Here to break down what this $10 billion fee means for deal making under Trump. We're joined by Miriam Gottfried Wall Street Journal reporter who broke this story. Miriam, let's get right into this. Right off the bat, the number is

astounding, especially if TikTok is valued at $14 billion, around 70% of the deal size. That's the

broker fee. Have we ever seen anything like this before? I would say it's pretty much unprecedented. I hate to say it's the biggest ever because I'm not a deal historian, but it's certainly among the biggest efforts all but unprecedented. This is strange that we're there asking for money

It's certainly not something that I've heard of before, but you have to remember that the government that Congress effectively banned TikTok in the U.S. So the situation was this app is going to go dark unless a sale to the U.S. investor group happens. It was a unique situation to begin with that needed the government's help to facilitate a transaction. I needed government approval. The government had to say this deal passes muster and satisfies our security concerns and will prevent

the app from going dark. The way you describe that, that makes sense. It's like it's the government's job to decide whether it's secure, whether the deal makes sense, whether it's figured out all

“of its national security concerns. And that's what we don't know. I'm not a security expert.”

I didn't dig into the TikTok algorithm. I don't know the level of the plan that was put in place. But it's sort of like, "Oh, we got this really valuable app here. You guys want this valuable app. How much would it be worth for you to make this happen?" You know, for us to let this happen. It gives you that feeling that sort of, you know, this investor group needed the government, and so it was sort of a price that had to be paid. Right. Which sounds concerning at least to me.

It also seems concerning, the fact that the company's been valued at around $14 billion,

or at least that's what JD Vance told us. Right. But analysts have said that that valuation is significantly lower than what it should have been. So that's something to keep in mind. Right. That's the part that seems to be suspicious, which is, I wonder if the valuation was so low. I mean, the valuation makes no sense to me. This is the company that's worth $300 billion. We don't know what the revenue of TikTok US actually is. But I've heard that it's

certainly higher than $10 billion. Maybe close to $20 billion. If you're valuing this company at

$14 billion, that just makes no sense at all when you compare it to other social media platforms.

So I wonder if the valuation was artificially suppressed. And then maybe this $10 billion is the price

“you pay to get in at such a ridiculous valuation. I mean, is that also what they're paying for?”

It's hard to say. I mean, for sure, it seems like $10 billion is the price that you pay to get this, to make this happen. The question is, is the real valuation $10 billion plus $14 billion? Maybe that's what the real valuation is, or maybe it's even higher than that. I guess we'll find out how much the company is worth when the IPO is soon to happen, probably. I'm guessing. And I think that will,

I mean, we'll never know what the true valuation should have been at that point in time,

and unless we get access to the financials and can maybe put an appropriate multiple on it. Just before we let you go, I want to discuss this truth social post that Trump put out over the weekend. President Trump is reshaping the media. Has a list of things that are gone. PBS, Defunded, NPR, Defunded, Jim Acosta, out at CNN, and the reforms. New ownership for CNN, apparently, that means that this deal is all said and done. Free speech on X, and then also TikTok saved.

I just wanted to get your reactions. What do you make of this post and what does it say about the media landscape under Trump going forward? Well, I mean, I would say that Trump has done a lot to make a point to Americans that he saved TikTok. He decided that he loved the app during the run-up to this past election because a lot of his supporters were very active on it. He garnered

“a lot of support from young people on TikTok. I think he basically developed a special place in his”

heart for TikTok and he knows that Americans love it. So he wanted to use it to score political points. The ability to save it was something that he wanted to show that he had done. And I think that he's trying to, you know, continue to reinforce that probably as we head toward the midterms. Yeah. All right, Miriam Gottfried, Paul Street Journal reporter, Miriam, really appreciated time. My pleasure. Well, everyone's talking about the Oscars right now, but there was another very significant live event that took place

this weekend as well that was arguably more significant than the Oscars. And that was, of course, profg. Markets live from South by Southwest. Yes, profg. Markets went live, in Texas, our third

who we were wearing, many are even calling it the Oscars of business. I think that's generous,

“but it's not entirely wrong. Jokes aside, I thought we would end here with a detour from the new”

cycle and a quick reflection on this live show at South by Southwest, which was genuinely so much fun for us. As I've said before, when you're putting out this many episodes as we're doing and when we're analyzing our performance and we're tracking the downloads, sometimes I get so caught up in the numbers that I forget that you guys, the audience are actually real. They're actually real people listening to the show. And I know that sounds strange, but this is one of the weird

things about building on the internet, especially building a media company on the internet. You technically

“know that you're interacting with other people, but you don't necessarily feel that. It doesn't”

always feel, well, real. And so that was what I loved about South by actually got to meet all of

you guys and interact with you. And indeed, see that you're all real. And I just love how this show brings all these different types of people together, which is what we saw. I mean, we met with people who work in finance, people who work in tech, people who work in law, we met with college professors, college students, start up founders, even high schoolers, all kinds of people. But there were a few things that I noticed that seems to bring us all together that we all had in common. And one

was that we were all very intellectually curious, which I wasn't particularly surprised by, too.

Everyone was a little bit nerdy, including myself. And three, and this is the thing that struck me most, three, everyone at this event was incredibly ambitious. I mean, no matter who you talk to, no matter where they worked, everyone seemed to have their shit together for lack of a better term, or at the very least, they were getting their shit together. And everyone was making their next move. Their next move to progress in some way as an employee or as a boss or even as a parent. We had

a lot of those discussions, too. This was clearly a group of highly ambitious people. And this ambition that I felt in the room was honestly infectious. I mean, it made me want to work harder. It made me want to make the show even better because I could see what kinds of people we're making this show for. And what I learned, or I guess re-land, is that the bar is actually quite high. So thank you for coming to the show. And as we close here, here is to being more ambitious.

We've got a lot more ideas we're working on. You might have seen we're also launching on

“Substack now. I will be doing a live stream on that platform tomorrow. So if you want to watch that,”

go subscribe to [email protected]/subscribe. And we're also going to be having many more live events in the future, including a Profty Market's tour, which I am very excited about. And I will be telling you more about that very soon. Okay, that's it for today. This episode is produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss, edited by Joel Paterson, and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. A video editor is Brad Williams.

I'll research team is down. Sha'lan is about a kid's soul, Kristen O'Donnelly, and Mia Salvario. And our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Profty Markets from Profty Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Allison. I will see you tomorrow.