03-16-26 Part One - CNN, Antifa and the Oscars

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues, and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America. We are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara. Hi. All right. You know, if you ever listen to our show and you say, "I don't

“know if I believe you guys," when you talk about the liberals out there in the liberal”

media, well, let us just play this audio cut here from Don Lemon. All right. All right. This one viral over the weekend. You ready for this? I think so. Hey, here we go. All right. This is Don Lemon talking about CNN. Tell us if you've heard this anywhere. All right. Here we go. I was speaking to Kevin O'Leary the other night, and he said, "Well, CNN has to, they've got to come to the middle to gain more audience." I was like, "You're out of your mind.

That's never going to happen. You crazy?" I was like, "Those folks are never ever going

to watch CNN, and they're never going to watch any network that is a factual news organization." So, we said it. What's interesting is John Malone, who's part of the Warner Brothers group, Warner Brothers Discovery, right? Okay. They were going in when they were taking over basically CNN, which is interesting now because it looks like Paramount Plus will buy Warner Brothers, which means Paramount Plus who owns CBS, Barry Weiss, will also own CNN

when they're done with it. And so we don't know if she's going to be part of the CNN News organization or not. But back when Warner Brothers was taking over the Warner Brothers group

“was taking over CNN, or they were about to. John Malone, one of the key figures in that”

organization was saying he would like to go back to the old headline news days. And even

I just started snoring basically right on the year. I couldn't even say headline news

without snoring in the middle. And because we said, "Look, be opinionated. That's fine. But have the debate." And of course, they're not going to have that. And also, don't go back to pouring headline news. We'll have zero audio cuts if you do. We'll have nothing for the show. Well, when I liked this, he said Liberals do not want any factual news network. That came from John Lambs. I mean, we said it. And we said, "Look, the problem

with CNN right now." And I'm reading, this is, I don't know, maybe from last week, it's the lead headline at National Review. CNN bombs networks bungling of the New York City attack could have, could not have come at a worse time. Once is an accident. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is a trend. And four times is CNN. No, that's it. I mean, and so we have said that, you know, when you, if Scott Jennings and they'll bring Republicans

on, and one of the things is, and we've talked about this before, all almost all, whether it's Fox or CNN, all argue Republican versus Democrat. They don't argue necessarily conservative, libertarian mindset versus liberal socialist mindset. Right. And that's where you get into a problem where they have to defend their party no matter what. And where the real insanity is is in the Democratic Party. And so when you have, as we have said,

the problem is, if CNN believes, well, if we bring some Republicans on, you know, then

we'll get conservatives to, you know, Republicans to watch it. They're not because you have to go through four or five insane liberals before you get a moment of Scott Jennings. So you can take that moment of Scott Jennings. And you can put it on YouTube. And that might go viral, but nobody's going to watch your TV network. Right. Exactly. And then what I, but I just find the best is though, is, uh, Donald, and saying liberals are not

going to watch any, he didn't say they're not going to watch. New, Republican spin. Right. He said they're not going to watch. Fatty, fat, new, any fact-based news. Yeah. Liberals

“are not going to watch. Well, what did the judge say? Remember in the case with what's”

your name over at the MS now? When, when it said, well, nobody's watching her show. I must

watching her show because it's factual. There's, there's nothing factual, actually he was saying there's nothing factual coming after, but coming out of her show. Right. They're no from her show. Nobody should expect that Rachel Maddo is telling you the truth. Right. He said, I mean, there's a shea. It was, yeah, it was a shea. And, and, well, I, I didn't, I did not have the gender. I, the, I apologize. I, that's my, that's my, that's my,

they said that the judge, they said, that still drives me nuts and stores. They, well, I thought it was one person. They, so you big it. Thanks. How ancient of me. They said that, and it was to decide if something that was said on the show was factual, what nobody's here for the facts, nobody believes this is, actually, the whole point of the judge was,

it cannot be defamation if nobody believes you're in the first place. Yes. And it's like,

“wow, that those tort law out the window by the way, when it comes to cable news, right?”

And it's a pop into my head here. Think about it. You're a plural versus singular, yeah, uh, pronoun big it. Yeah. But it's based on plural versus singular. Well, no, because they is singular. It's also plural. It's both. Well, that's, I mean, you're, you're a big it over that, that. Right. If I, if I, if I, if I assume, if I assume, they is only plural, right, then that's where I've made the mistake. Exactly. I should be

in a Canadian jail. And, and see, this is what you would call, oh, what do they call it, the, uh, unconscious, yeah, unconscious pronoun bigotry. Right. Exactly. Exactly. You know what I thought, but the time I woke up to come in here at 10 o'clock. One of the thoughts in my mind was, we can just go on the air and say, look, everything's really the same as last Friday. We're going home.

And not that there haven't been things that have happened, but it's, the arguments are still the same.

“Yeah. I'm, I'm, I'm watching Jake Tapper. And he's, he's talking to, uh,”

Spartacus. Um, and Corey Booker, Corey Booker because people don't know what's up. Spartacus. I'm going to Spartacus. I'm going to wear that forever. He's talking about the fact that, well, uh, you know, the Congress in, uh, in their war powers have, have seated that authority to the executive branch.

What the hell is, I don't even know, I'll find the audio cut. But I'm just, I'm during our pre-show meeting. You were doing something over there and I'm over her going, Eric. I'm just like, this is, it's not you saying Congress is sitting there.

Basically, there are authority to the president here.

Right. You know, on war things because, uh, they've done it for the longest time.

“Obama, presidents, whatever Congress, no, they haven't.”

No, no, they haven't. The presidents have that power before the, before Congress, gave the president approval to do what he did in Iran. He already had approval by the Constitution. Yes. Nobody seated anything. And then because Congress voted and said, okay, he can do it.

We approve of it whether Democrats voted for it or not doesn't matter. When then you can't make even that moral argument. You can't make a congressional argument because Congress passing a law, saying the president can't do this under the Constitution as meaningless. Absolutely meaningless.

While you're previewing that audio, I was over your busy. Someone locked me out of my space account and I was just trying to get back. Yeah. I mean, I know it's been 24 years, but cheese. You would think they wouldn't lock me out.

Well, you're trying to find out what Mitch McConnell was posting on social media. Yeah, that's exactly the answer. Yeah, but he's posting for him. But I'm, and I'm just like, all the arguments are the same that they were last week. But then I realized, well, basically, all the arguments were the same the week before,

the same the week before that, the week before that, the week before that,

and it's where we get into this thing that you and I always talk about.

That is the one thing that at times I've actually, you know, said to all of our great listeners, I know sometimes it sounds like we're repeating the same argument,

Right. Exactly.

“And they keep doing, and there's only one way to answer it.”

And it's the same way with, well, no.

This is the way that it really is. This is the truth. You're still spotting out because they'll spot off the same lie. Day in, day out, right. Every week, every month, every year, every decade, every century.

Okay. Maybe I'm going to a little too far with century. I don't know. We could probably go back and find it. I think I could go back to a pub.

But it was just, but I woke up. I just looked, I just, quickly and I, you know, getting paid attention to the news, but when you wake, when I wake up at 10 o'clock, it's like, okay. Let me see here.

Same, same, same, same, same, same, same, same. Yeah. Now, some of the good, some of the stuff was really good though, because Cory Booker, Don, Cory Booker, Don Lemon. [laughs]

“Don Lemon saying that reminded me what you told me just before”

we went on the air. How the, the president apparently has been also listening to our show. Yes, he has. In fact, I, well, I was, you know,

I finally got the MySpace thing figured up.

And then I went over to my ex account, logged in over there, and saw something by our good friend, Mark Levin. And he, he reposted a truth social post by the president. The president wrote a fairly lengthy,

very nice complimentary piece about Mark Levin, basically calling him a patriot and, you know, and thank him for his support. But also, you know, the fact that Mark is pro is real and anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism.

And, and you, you see all of this, you know, that's going back with the social media influences. And they all at one point at one point at one point. We're trying to prove they're more maga than anybody else. And then another point we're trying to prove they were more maga

than president Trump. And then it's because, I mean, going after those that are anti-Semitic. Not now, I said anti-Semitism. But he's going after those that are anti-Semitic. So probably play that part up.

I can, if Mark's listening, and we know he does once in a while. All of a sudden, the state's going to put a one-hit tone on. What do I have to do with you? But you get anti-Semitic. Wow.

“Very important that I knew it was extremely important.”

But go ahead, go ahead. No, I didn't. No, I didn't. Because you caught it, and I didn't. That would have been a meeting.

People we don't ever have meetings with that would have been a meeting. And Mark, we greatly apologize for that. We're that screw up there. We know he's very forgiving of my very kind to us. But in this piece, and we talked about how many.

Wow, wow. I've got to been so bad. We can't anti-Semitic. He's exactly, he's pro-Israel. Anti-Semitic.

Oh, man, we got to be weird. Make sure we get that right. But we-- because in today's world, you don't know the people that were calling themselves maga. We know this.

We certainly always have known about Mark Levin.

But certain people on social media calling themselves maga. And in the president, it doesn't name them. But he kind of goes after them. And they were, say, well, you know, we're more maga. And we actually made the point that they were at some point trying to really

make the point that they were more maga than the president. Because he would after Iran and the whole thing. And he stood with Israel and all this. And we said, look, stop. And we've been saying this really since the beginning.

The only people inside on the inside with President Trump, with few exceptions, are named Trump. The ones that he can truly trust are named or Kushner. And that's it. His family.

And I would say, Marco Rubio, I would say there are some real loyalists there. That you don't-- and they're not out there trying to make themselves more maga on social media than President Trump. They're not part of this social media group that's out there that's kind of gone in my opinion, haywire.

But the president recognized that that we're going after Mark Levin. And so he wrote this nice piece about Mark defending Mark Levin. And the whole thing. And then he had some-- at some point. Let me bring this closer and I'm going to ask this on hold.

He said, all right. Those that speak ill of Mark will quickly fall by the wayside as to the people whose ideas,

All in all caps here. They are not maga. I am.

And I love that because we said that.

And that's our whole point was. Maga is whatever the president is doing. That's maga. Because we had said it when this all-- when the split started happy. And we said, how do you define maga?

All right. And we were talking about as a philosophy, how do you define it?

“The only thing we could come up with is, oh, maga was created by Trump.”

So whatever Trump wants is maga. Right. That's maga. And if you create the maga badge, again, you pretty much have to be Donald Trump. Right.

And but we had said that portion of maga. How much of his base are the people that vote for him consider themselves maga? Some don't. Right. Independent stone.

Democrats don't. They voted for him. Right. But they may not consider themselves maga.

But we always said to that portion, which includes the Tucker Carlson, the Steve

Bannon stuff like that. Yeah. That said, you know, with our question, that they believe the Trump was an isolationist. Right. Right.

Yeah. Yeah. And we said, no, he's not. No. No.

We've all. If you've been a long time, listen, show you. No, he's not. He just does things differently. He was tested early on.

And when he took out Solomoni, he went, okay, he's not an isolationist.

“Remember, he was, remember the planes were in the air?”

Yeah. And they pulled back and they go, okay, this is Trump's isolationist wing. And he's realizing he's a nice isolationist. All of a sudden, Solomoni gets taken out. And it's like, no, he's not an isolationist.

He's just, and you see this here in Iran. Yeah. But he's not, but he's not, not an isolationist.

And we never believed he was.

No. We are right. I radio. Hey there. This is hopes of our with mother trucker yoga.

And here's your health tip of the day. Healthy driver. Healthy diesel. Powered by house. Lower back pain is one of the most common complaints amongst truck drivers.

Let's fix that. Sit up tall in your seat. Inhale and arc your lower back away from the seat. Like there's a pin behind you. Now exhale, round your back and tuck your tailbone under.

Just like the shape of the letter C. Repeat that movement five, ten, even 15 times until your lower back and hips. Start to loosen up and feel ready for the road. There you go. Small, simple changes can lead to big results.

So that you, my friend, can feel good again. Visit mother trucker yoga.com and house products.com for more tips and support. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently getting Gary McNamara. Welcome in good morning. The other thing is that we'll talk about more about is the instant analysis that we're getting from the media who's really clueless about what's going on in a war.

The instant conclusions are coming up as to what the military's straight or more moves for example. And I saw a couple of general saint. Of course the military has a plan to take it out. Yeah. Of course it's part of what their plan is.

“But the fact is you encounter things, maybe.”

And again, this is just a general umbrella, not based on any facts. But in any war you encounter things that may take a couple more days or a week. You know, to finish the job to get it done and the instant analysis that's been going on here from the mainstream media is to me childish wrong. Yeah. And uncalled for us.

Yes. We'll get to more of this. Tired of part of the noise. America's more divided than ever. But independent Americans is adding the light to contrast all that she independent Americans.

Daily news with Army veteran Paul Rikha. Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future. We're going to bring the righteous media five lives. Independence, integrity, information, inspiration, and impact.

Independent Americans, from belief, funnel and listen on your favorite platform.

We are at Red Eye Radio Live. Every night on the Red Eye Radio app available in the app store. Reddit. I radio. I think I interrupted him.

Sorry, big guy. Yeah. We're on radio. I'm Gary McNamara. He's our girl.

He's coming up in just a couple of minutes. We'll hear from the former fifth fleet commander on how he believes the war is going. Let me ask you a question.

“Are you one of those people that does a lot for other people, but not so much for yourself?”

You got to take care of yourself.

When it comes to your pain, you can manage your pain like I did with relief factor. In fact, I'm glad that I did it. I started taking relief factor every day years ago. And it has changed me so much that, guess what? In the end, I'm able to actually help people more often because the aches and pains aren't there.

Even with the smallest things back in the day, the aches and pains before during and after doing those tasks was a lot to deal with. You can do something about your pain with relief factor. That's one hundred percent. Drug-free research-based formula.

Four key ingredients that work on the body's natural inflammatory response function. Let's get you started with a three week quick start for just 1995. Relieffactor.com. Relieffactor.com. Or call 800-number four relief.

800-4 relief. Relieffactor.com.

“Use red eye to drop down for your three week quick start at 1995.”

As we were talking about before, the bottom of the hour. One of the things that I just shake my head at is the instant analysis about every minute of the war and coming to a conclusion, whether it means we're winning or losing. Right. Which is the most ridiculous thing that you could possibly do.

The interesting thing is over the weekend I was watching YouTube videos like crazy. I'm no commercials, so one leads into another. I put an algorithm and it can be a music video and then something of one of the, I was telling you during the break watching videos on all these engineers that produced its sunset video and Michael Jackson and Princeton and Van Halen.

And to hear the engineers talk, it's all the engineers. Right. And you know, just fascinating. And all of a sudden something came up. It's like, ah, the history of Saipan, which in World War II was one of the, some of the bloodiest battles that you saw.

And that immediately came to my mind.

“And I started thinking about the instant analysis that's being done.”

You know, minute by minute, oh, this happened. Or we didn't get this. That means we failed. And that means we're losing the war. We're not losing this war for God's sake.

No, we're not. You know, now as we have said, you know, the end game is a mystery and a huge challenge. Because it's not that the United States isn't. And it's not like the United States. And our allies are going to put in a huge UN police keeping force and installing a government.

You saw the Shaw sun said we've got our government over weekend. Right. And we've got it ready to go. And I'm like, okay, that's really interesting. So we're an uncharted territory here.

But when you talk about the military strike, there's always a challenge.

But we've never gone like this before of using air power. Right. Air power. And I'll also say probably Israeli. And I don't know covert special American forces.

We probably will never know if that's happening or not. But to sit there and say, we're losing the war. It's just complete and total ignorance of the, you know, of these of these people. And you and I've said, you know, with the straight or more music of now, the military had, you know, the joint chiefs get together.

They had it. Now the politicians may be talking. And the civilians might be talking in the government of the administration. Yeah. And maybe responding instantaneously, and therefore it keeps it going back and forth.

But just from the military's perspective alone. Of course, it was built in from the beginning. Were there challenges that they might not have thought that they would encounter?

Yeah. That's not new.

It doesn't mean you're losing the war.

And I just thought it was ridiculous. But this was Martha Rattitz with a former fifth fleet commander, Kevin Dunigan over the weekend. Here we go. But you say we knew about their capabilities. And certainly in the straight.

“Are you surprised that we didn't do more or have a bigger plan for, for against that?”

I would say that if you look at the campaign, sent comes initiated. This was built into it from the beginning. And when you think about it in terms of the things that the chairman said and the thing said, Admiral Cooper said his mission was. One of the things in there was to just to go after the Navy.

And what they really meant was a landscape ability to control the streets when this is over. Because we don't want them to have power protection capability. We also don't want them to have this leverage over this internet. You know, this is such an important chokehold. So this effort that that.

It's being done and being waged by sent come is specifically to get at their cruise missile threat.

There are ability to launch drones and boats put mines in the water. All those things that when this is over, you want them not to have. That makes any sense. Yes, it makes sense. Yeah, no, it does.

And you look at that. And you know, to your point, I'll add to it that. It's as if especially the liberal activist media believes that they have a place.

“In the situation room in the war room, and they want to get a memo before things happen.”

Right. We want to know how it's going. We want to we want to update every day. We want this. We want that.

We want a score. And if we're not going to get the score, which they're not going to get the score.

Then we're going to assign a score of our own.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

“And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.”

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. We're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

“And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.”

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score.

And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. And if we're not going to get the score, we're not going to get the score. But when you look at the media's take on everything, they don't care about because

there's some interesting points to make. You and I don't know 10 years, 20 years from now, what a ran is going to look like. We don't know. I can't tell you that. I can tell you that the strategy so far has been a good strategy. It is not going to be perfect because it's war.

But if you can if, they can accomplish the regime being gone. And a ran not ever having the possibility, not even as was just mentioned in the audio cut, not ever being able to really rebuild anything. And then just focus on new leadership focusing on their economy through oil.

You know, again, with a watchful eye over those future years, this is a game changer. It changes the trajectory of the Middle East. Absolutely. And when I brought up Saipan before, because just taking over those the islands, we look at Saipan. We look at Eo, Eo, Eo, Eo, Ejima. The number of people in World War II that we were losing.

If we had social media today, it was already getting back because of social media, we didn't have, there wasn't a media that was, you know, pro-Japan and still the pressure to stop that was one of the reasons that we dropped the atomic bombs on Japan. It was one of the reasons that we did not go in and invade. Right. Because there was the public opinion by so much loss.

And I've always, when I saw this over the weekend, I went, my gosh.

In today's day and age, would we have sat there and said, well, we're just going to allow Japan to exist. Right. That wasn't enough. We're going to allow Japan. And I don't know. I mean, it's all hypothetical.

“Right. But when you see what's going on, and I think it was the Democrat council.”

I can't think of his name for the Democrats saying my God, you know, and he's a lifelong Democrat. He was council for the Democrats for years. Julian Epstein. Oh, yeah. I think it was time with Mark Leven. And we had mentioned Mark Leven. Yeah. Yeah.

And he's saying my God. I mean, these people are, they're anti-US. They're actually, they're pro-oran Democrats. Yes. The Democrats are pro-oran. I can't believe what's going on. He's a Democrat, you know, Jonathan Turley's, you know, this almost saying the exact same thing. What the hell's going on here? You know, we all know,

you know, they're still arguing the Iran nuclear deal. When we've got the audio of dozens and dozens of Democrats, including their leader Chuck Schumer saying, Absolutely not. We cannot go with Obama's deal.

Right. It will allow them to get a nuclear weapon. We will basically sign an agreement,

a treaty that will make it so they can get a nuclear bomb. We do not have, you know, we do not have, we're going to give tons of cash. We're not really, you know, they can mix inspections. I can do a bunch of things. No, this is completely totally unacceptable. And they're still arguing that. Yeah.

“Well, no, I mean, it's, again, it's, the mindset is why are you giving us memos ahead of time?”

Why are you doing what we, it really is this weird thing where the, the media believes they belong in the wheelhouse for some reason, like there needs to be full transparency during war. You know, like they want the president, the president will talk to anybody at any time, again, sometimes to, you know, a fault.

But he's been very, as transparent as you can be in a situation like this. But he's not going to tell you everything that goes on or that he's planning to do that day. We are Red Eye Radio. We lined up on for your goals. 866, 90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio.

If you've, again, been a long time listener or short time listener to the show,

you know, when this started or other war start, we, we don't make instant conclusions, based minute by minute on what the media may be reporting on a war.

“That's why we said when this started, we said, okay, we'll wait a month on five weeks,”

which seems to be the time span that the president gave, and that's, okay, that's why we'll judge it. We'll judge it on that particular time span as to what has been accomplished and what needs to be accomplished. But to sit there and say, the Iran regime is doing well. You know, the US has no strategy.

Our capabilities may not be what we think. That's pure propaganda coming from the media. Exactly.

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.

But what I wanted to tell you, but I didn't want to get to the studio. Mr. Bautag left Topysia Soft behind the internet. It's a master's real name. Oh, you can say, you can't say the same thing. You've got a story, right?

But you don't believe it. Not yet. Egal!

“Zauberwood, for example, is a challenge.”

Do you do a lot of work with Viso Stoia?

And if you then do it, you will be able to do it.

That's right. Viso Stoia! Hold your money back. Now you can try it out. Exynep, Exynep, Exynep, Lina Pisa, goes for it out.

Now, it's Renni Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show, from the Relief Factor Studios. He's Renni Radio.

All across America, we are Renni Radio, and he is there currently and I'm Gary McNamara welcome. And good morning, thanks so much for being here this morning. This, from a so-called press, look at how they wrote this here. All nine alleged antifa members accused of ambushing Alvarado's facility, found guilty

of one or more federal accounts, including an attempted murder charge. Perhaps most notably eight defendants were found guilty of providing material support to terrorists, solidifying the federal government's assertion that antifa is a terrorist organization. Jerry deliberations have produced multiple guilty verdicts in the July 4th, 2025 ambushed the ICE detention center in Alvarado, eight of nine defendants have been found guilty

on federal charges of providing material support to terrorists, rioting, conspiracy to carry an explosive and use and carrying of an explosive. The ninth defendant was found guilty of corruptly concilling a document and along with another one of the defendants, conspiracy to conceal documents. The leader Benjamin Song was found guilty of attempted murder of officers and employees

of the U.S., he's the one that fired the shot that hit the police officer. Right. Yeah. The other defendants' charge with the Tentman murder were found not guilty. Don't know the reason why I don't know what evidence was brought for that.

Song was also found guilty of discharging a weapon.

“Does that mean the others did not discharge a weapon?”

I guess my point would be if there's a conspiracy and so much of this was a conspiracy and the leader fires a shot or shots or whatever, even if you don't fire a shot, aren't you part of the conspiracy? Yes, I would think so. Yeah.

Yeah. Conspiracy started according to officials early on. The conspiracy started online, you know, remember the story that got out that said these individuals didn't know each other. The account of providing material support to terrorists, solidifies a federal government's

action that Antifa is a terrorist organization. It's a missile set of press. Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization but allowed to fears in flourish, in Democrat led cities, not under President Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, said in a U.S. Department

Today's verdict on terrorism charges will not be the last as a Trump administration

“systematically dismantles Antifa and finally holds the violence on America's threats.”

But there you go. The jurors heard from 45 witnesses and considered over 210 exhibits in the trial, which began on February 23rd. Yeah. Wow.

Let me see, the verdict concludes in early three week trial. The defense attorney said the jury has spoken we move forward. I'm disappointed. You know, some of the protesters out there were saying this was just a protocol. The protest.

Are you kidding me? It wasn't a protest. That was an attack.

That was a planned attack.

“Mostly peaceful attack, are they going to try and put that one up there?”

This was a mostly peaceful attack, just ridiculous protest, you know. And it was just separated several days by several of the people, because they keep calling them protesters in this article. They keep saying the protests, it wasn't a protest, but it said the officers survive and testified in the trial, several protesters also testified for the prosecutors about

the incident. Unless there were separate protesters. Yeah. We think they were not. The suspects.

Yeah.

And the suspect protesters too.

Right. We just see here, but I didn't see where any of the suspects testified, but maybe I missed that part. I just want to get to where, throughout the trial, family members and supporters of the defendants gathered outside the federal courthouse, holding signs and banners in support

of the group multiple people showed up on Friday, waiting to hear the verdict.

“This is not the America, I believe in one of them said after the verdicts were delivered.”

This is not the America, I believe, going after killers. I just want to get where it's said, because, you see here, wow. Okay, I thought I said protesters being used elsewhere, but it looks like the protesters might have been separate protesters there. Yeah, I didn't see where any of the suspects testified, but I could have missed that.

Yeah, there it is. Okay. A alleged protest leader Benjamin Song was found guilty of a death and murder of officials. Yeah, that's true. That's true.

Yeah, that's how they phrase it. Yeah, protest leader. And by the way, it took them a while, I forget, was it 10 days or so to find him a couple of weeks. And he wasn't, he had not strayed far.

You would think, you know, you're trying, I don't know, across the border in Mexico or something, now he was in an apartment in North Dallas. That's where he was apprehended. And this was not. They protest.

Here's a Washington Post. Texas jury convicts protesters charged with plotting antifa, that's where I mean, that's where I get plotting antifa attack. Yeah, no, this isn't a protest. At the point, you decide you're going to be part of a group that's going to take up arms

against law enforcement, you're a terrorist. You're a criminal. You've committed a crime at that point. There it is. Sometimes protestors accused of antifa ties, found guilty of support for terrorism.

It was a mostly peaceful attack, that's the garbage from the left, right there. That's activism right there at work, those headlines. It's, it's absolutely ridiculous. I mean, the way that headlines are written, and part of its clickbait, most of its activism, what you, in this case, this is activism, pure activism.

They want you to come away with a headline, just read the headline and move away, don't get into the story, don't do your own research, don't go out there and get smart, you know, don't become your own Glenn Kessler, you know, and start handing out Pinocchio's fact

You have the ability to do that, but don't do that, just read the headline, we want you

“to believe just some protesters, got arrested and are getting convicted.”

This is a prosecutor's proof to the jury, yeah. The goal was to set off fireworks into a bunch of things, to vandalize it, and then shoot. Yes. How is that in any way labeled protesters, where was it that where was the evidence that existed that this was supposed to be a peaceful protest?

Right. And some of the descriptions, I don't know if this came from prosecution or officials

early on, but it was the fireworks, basically, where to draw officers out.

Right. Exactly. And so it was a fan of the line of fire. And their cars. Yeah.

Exactly. Yeah. Make it look like something big is starting, and then they all come out, and then they're sitting ducks. Right.

That was the idea.

“That's why I don't understand why the others were in charge, if there's a, I”

assume there's got to be a federal charge that exists out there, conspiracy to commit murder. What's that on line? Right. Once a shot is fired, we know there's a, do you know there was a conspiracy?

They all met online. Yeah. And that's a federal charge. If you're, if depending on how much of the conspiring was done online, you're

conspiring basically, that's across state lines.

And so I would like, because this doesn't seem like a jury that was afraid to find these, the people guilty, or right, have an attempt that, you know, murder charge there. Why couldn't they get, it'll be interesting to see why they believe the prosecutors couldn't prove the attempted murder charges of others. Right.

“Because it's not like they said, well, we don't care.”

It's ISO. You know, have a hey day, everybody's not guilty. That didn't happen. So why didn't they? Right.

Yeah, we wasn't attempt that murder or was it conspiracy to commit murder, because those would be two different charges. Right. Not to do more research on that. I just, though, these charges came into my mind as we're doing this.

Well, this idea of the media writing, you know, that this is about protesters, because they want people, and a lot of people do it. There's a lot of willful ignorance out there. They want people to just read the headline and go, look at this, but just a rusting protestors. You know, and then, of course, you're going to have to group that with everything that

happened in Minnesota with ICE. And get people to form an anti-ice, anti law enforcement opinion. That's the attempt. You're not telling the truth. This is a group of individuals who plotted together to attack law enforcement, to commit

a deadly attack against law enforcement. That didn't just show up just with fireworks. You know, we talked about, I look at the commit, I look at Politico, and you know, they're liberal bent, but they, you know, they're headline, eight accused of anti-fatize, convicted on terrorism charges over shooting at Texas Immigration Facility.

Yeah. Well, you look at the beginning, from the beginning officials that said, these people didn't know each other. They met online. Right.

Okay, how in the world do you get from? We know there are like-minded people out there. This is what we actually talked about. Yeah, they do conspire, but first, in order to even be a part of such a conspiracy, you've got to find the like-minded people.

Right.

It has to be a part of the same culture, the same mindset, which we have always said, that's

the most dangerous part, is the fact that these people agree, even if they don't know each other, and they also agree in the approach, clearly, because you were able to get this group together by doing this according to the authorities, by presenting this idea, you were able to get them on board with this. That sounds like something that came together in a, while it's well organized, very quick

These individuals needed money.

They needed time. They needed all of the assets in order to carry this thing out. And the goal was not to have a peaceful protest outside a nice detention facility. No. That was never the goal.

No.

“So once you start at that point, that's why I just wonder why conspiracy to commit murder”

wasn't a force. That's the board. Across the board. Yeah. I'll have to look into that.

Yeah. So, because if it indeed, if part of that conspiracy, if a lot of it in terms of organizing it, and conveying the thoughts of what was going to go down, happened online, if that part of it happened online, then who do you have in terms of their messages and everything else? And it really comes down to in prosecution, of course, what you can prove that they just

not have the evidence on all of them on conspiracy. I kind of find that hard to believe, that would mean that those individuals just showed up and didn't know that was going to happen, or they were told, and it is possible that they were told it's just going to be, we're just going to set off some fireworks, and we're

“just going to be, we're not, there's not, they didn't meant that.”

But I can't imagine. But in state law, in most states, if I'm the driver, and I know you're going to rob a store, no, you're part of it. And you commit murder, even though that wasn't, you kill the clerk, even though that was not your intent.

You knew your intent was to commit a lesser crime. You're an accessory at that point. If you're an accessory to murder, now this, the police officer was not murdered. Right. But I'm just talking, okay, I'll have to look into it.

I'm just guessing now on the lawn, and I don't want to confuse state law with federal law in a case like this, which is terrorism, which could be completely different. So, just thoughts going through my head, as they showed in these cases. Well, and again, the media's play on this, oh, yeah, the protesters.

This was not about a protest, never.

“This was about a violent, potentially deadly attack.”

That's the goal, yeah. The goal was to kill. Yep. That's why you use a gun. And I'm very curious to see why they didn't go the full measure on conspiracy for all.

I guess we'll see. We are right. I radio. This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by House Products, tested, trusted, guaranteed, since 1920.

Soybean oil production at March impacted by a change of the Soybean oil extraction rate, favoring more meal instead of oil. With the result, according to World Agre Cultural Outlook Board Chair, Mark Jekkenowski, Beig.

Soybean oil production down 20 million pounds this month.

An additional change at USDA Soybean oil outlook this month. A reduction in soybean oil used for bio fuel, which we lowered 800 million pounds, put that into the food feed and other category. And that is just based on what we've been observing. So far, this marking year, a little bit slower case of Soybean oil for bio fuel use

than our original forecast had accounted for. The end result, a 30 million pound increase in soybean oil and big stocks on the domestic ledger and no change in the season and the average price from February. Still, at 55 cents per pound. Not Rod Bay in reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C.

This report brought to you by Senox, Fules and Loves. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, toll-free at 8.6. You might be Red Eye. We're Red Eye Radio. He's our currently non-gurry McNamara.

Wow! Ha-ha-ha. Memdani and his tech spree. Here we go. Again, the plans he's coming up with will have more of this coming up following the

bottom of the hour. Again, we had talked about this a couple of weeks ago when it was the Grammys. Same thing happened with the Oscars. I had no idea.

I had no idea until I woke up that the Oscars were last night.

Yeah.

“And by the way, can I opt out of those notifications for ward chills?”

I don't need one every time another person wins from every news organization. I don't need one about the red carpet. I'm reading here, Jeffrey Blair, from National Review, on Oscar night, Hollywood celebrates its collapse into cultural irrevelents. Yeah.

It's Oscar night America, can you feel the waves of meaningless, meaningless, gently washing over you?

You're ready to soak up one more time in Hollywood's self-regard.

Well, no, it is irrelevant because the awards things they don't, I saw, but what did I see on, that came up in my queue, I think, I don't know if it was Netflix or YouTube. It was the actor's awards, like, oh, that's, that's like a generic, that's like a generic version of an award show, the actor's awards. And of course, I wasn't going to click on it.

Nobody cares about those tropes, nobody cares about those tropes. It's the work.

“And by the way, if you want to know who's winning, look at the box office numbers, which”

are by the way, dwindling.

Tell your friends, we're here tonightly, Eric Arley and Gary McNamara on Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio, he's here currently non-hearing McNamara, done with our Red Eye Radio app today, and you can listen when and where you choose, all right, just an update because we've been doing research when we were talking about the antifa terrorists during Texas that were found to be antifa, and that's actually part of the charges that they

were found guilty on, but some of their code defendants did testify against them. This actually is the case because seven others outside of this nine actually pleaded guilty last year to one count of providing material support to terrorist and not all of them, but a four or five of those seven did testify, they became witnesses in the case, according

“to the Justice Department, I'm getting this information in fact from the Justice Department”

website, straight from Justice.gov, so it says here witnesses who testified during the government's case include the Alvarado Police Officer who was shot by Song, who was the group's leader. Detention officers present that night who also took cover from rapid fire, multiple additional responding officers, numerous investigative agents, and cooperating code defendants, and

then they go to name one, two, three, four of the seven who pleaded guilty last year. So obviously part of a plea agreement there, so we were wondering there, and again, it's also about what you can, what you can prove in, and what information you can get along the way if the idea was, okay, Benjamin Song in this case, if it was the case that he pulled the trigger, if you're going through this prosecut, prosecutorial stage, then you're going

to want as many people on the inside talking as you can get, and then in order to get that, their lawyers are going to want to deal, so that's just the way it works. So we're just talking about the, the Oscars, and I was just reading this from National Review, an Oscar night, Hollywood celebrates its collapse into cultural irrelevance. I thought I might pen a brief paragraph or two to mark the occasion, seeing how it is

unlikely I'll ever do so again on this subject here at National Review. Why? Because this is among the final years that the Academy Awards will be nationally televised. I was going to YouTube, right? Yep.

It was announced last year that the award ceremony will retreat to the Internet Simulcast in 2029. Therefore, tonight marks the unofficial psychological point for me, beyond which the Academy Awards abandons the pretense that it remains a national event.

of coastal, elite taste and politics, sure, they'll play out the string for another couple of years, maybe Project Hail Mary is the Hail Mary Pass Hollywood needs to revive itself, but in the end, but the end of the National ritual is now in sight.

“It's deeply symbolic, and it's a shame, because I remember when I used to care about”

the Oscars uniquely among awards shows. Nobody cares about the Grammys. I can assure you of that fact. I used to feel a far deeper investment in film culture, and my disenchantment has with it has to do less with my changing like circumstances, and with the changing taste of Hollywood,

and those of the mass audiences that drive it. He said, as the film celebrated at the Oscars becomes more obscure with each passing year, the politics of the Oscars becomes ever more insistent, impossible for me to ignore. I feel as if the Oscars exist mostly so we can get yearly updates on what Robert De Nirod thinks about the current presidential administration.

So I mean, that's the whole point. It's become something that does not relate to Americans anymore to so many Americans. Right. It just doesn't, and it's about leftist politics, and it's about stupidity, and it's about stupid people.

“Well, it is, and movies were always, I think, in the infancy after silent movies.”

In the early years, you get into the 40s, 50s, 60s, and there was this cool era where, all right, we hadn't seen that before, right? There were a couple of things happening.

Well, pop music, and then, which really was big band at first, and then that kind of evolved

into rock and roll, Bill Haley in the comments were a big band group, and then all of the sudden you've got Elvis, then you got the Beatles, and all this pop culture thing was exploding during this era. So people hadn't seen it, and it was an escape, right? You got to go see the latest movie.

You would see newsreels at the movie theater. You know, it was, especially during wartime. You know, this was something where people thought, okay, we can get out of the house. There's, when they said nothing was on TV, they actually meant it. There was nothing on TV, you know, they got two, three networks, and it wasn't, you

know, there was really not much going on.

Radio was there since 1922, has always been there, and no video didn't kill the radio

star. In fact, the MTV VJs are all working in radio now, so there's that. It's, but you think a true story, and it's, the ones who were still living. And it's, it is this, it was a scapeysm, and it was kind of, you know, the extravagant every man had a, seemed to have a cigarette in his hand, you know, every woman was wearing

a fur coat. Oh, we can't have that. And, you know, it was the, it was the lights in the glamour and people, you know, enjoyed the escapism. The movies, uh, sometimes were a real connection to people, or escapism, it's one

of the other. But like cool hand look, that was realism, because everybody's been to prison. And, you know, you got to, I remember going to that, you know, especially the car wash scene.

“It was not a, it was not a, you know, one of those things where, and I think there was”

a pretentious attitude about it, but it was so new, it was almost like those people were on another planet, you know, I remember my mom telling me, when she went and saw Elvis. She was a teenager, she and her two girlfriends went to see Elvis live.

And they didn't know what he was going to do, because they've never seen anybody dance

like that. Those movies, they thought he was going to take his clothes off. So they actually put their sweaters over their eyes. And she said, and everybody was just screaming, she said, I couldn't hear a thing. I really couldn't hear the music because the screaming, I actually went to a show like

that later in my years as a father. I took my, one of my daughters to see and sink back in the day and pink opened, pink was great, but during and sink, you couldn't hear anything. It was all screams, the Beatles, you know, playing the stadiums back in the day.

And it's an activism to where, you know, at first they thought, well, we've got to show that we're good stewards, giving something back, doing something more than just being pretentious. We're going to save the planet, or we're going to, whatever, this is our cause, we're going to feed the children, we're going to, you know, whatever it is.

And then it just became purely political and it's always had that looking down their

nose.

“I think even back in the day, it's had that pretentious streak.”

And people were able to dismiss it because, you know, back then they didn't care. It's just that nothing else was on. If there were, if there was an award show back in the day, there was really nothing else on. You know, that's like, okay, I guess you're watching that.

You know, and then with now with so many choices and Hollywood struggling to stay relevant, two of the best pictures were actually streaming pictures. They put them in theaters long enough to qualify, two of the pictures that were nominated for best picture were actually on streaming services.

They put them in the theaters out, I don't know what they, what qualifies.

But that tells the story of where the irrelevance is going. And the reason is you pay whatever you pay for a Netflix or a Paramount plus of whatever it is per month, and you're going through, and you're watching, and it's kind of like a buffet, right? And it's like, nah, I know I put a bunch of food on my plate, but it doesn't taste good.

So I'm going to get some other food. So you just move on very quickly. You're not as engaged as you are when you go to a theater, you've already paid the, I don't even know how much a ticket costs anymore, 20 bucks, whatever it is. You're sitting down, you bought the, you know, $200 popcorn, and soda, and you're there

with another person probably, otherwise it's weird.

And you're going to take it in, and it's a day out of the house, right?

Was streaming, you're sitting there, and you're pajamas, we hope you're dressed. But you're also bin Affleck and his heterosexual life partner, Matt Damon. We're on Rogan, and they actually talked about it. They said it's, it's impossible to get someone's whole attention, because so much stuff on streaming, and when they're watching on streaming, the majority, like it's like 90%

of adults that watch streaming say they're on their phone while they're watching something. And if you're a busy person, that applies, or if you're a bored person, that applies. So Hollywood is struggling to stay relevant while they get more and more, not even pretentious. They just become vile in their, this isn't disagreement.

Well, when policy, this is, this is more than that.

“This is believing that their self-righteousness, that's what it really comes down.”

But there's still, there's still stuff to, you know, for example, Taylor Sheridan went on his own, went on his own, not being controlled and not being told what to do, has come up with a ton of great entertaining things that America loves, watching shows. And I was sinking the other day, though, just, you know, when I just look at Disney, for example.

And it was, and it was because I had seen the other day, and I had forgot about it, the movie's secretariat. Yeah. It was a great movie. That was the Disney movie.

Yeah. Yeah. That was a great movie. I mean, that was just, you know, that was, you know, and, you know, base in reality.

“And I think of other Disney, that kind of sports movie that they did, the greatest”

game I've ever played, which was Francis, we may winning the 19, I think it's 14, which is considered besides miracle. And it's interesting because Disney did miracle, which is considered the, was the greatest sporting event of the 20th century. And from a team, you know, aspected was.

Yeah. But individual, it goes back to Francis, we may, because in 1914, because he, when you see the story, you're like, oh my God, I mean, when you know of the story, he was just a kid who was an amateur beat the top golfers in the world in the US open. And it's a great movie and everything is great about that movie.

And it was done very well. It was, it was done. It was just done, you know, Western's like unforgiven, you know, by Clint Eastwood. And unforgiven, when you look at, when you look at, when you look at, when you look at, a tombstone, I was just looking at Disney though, just some of the stuff that they, they're

Remember the rookie, about Jim Morris, 36 years old, who became a pitcher for, was a Tampa,

“I think it was Tampa, was Tampa, Florida.”

But he made his debut. He's from Texas, made his debut with the stadium here at the old baseball stadium, glory road, which was a Disney movie, which was about Texas Western winning the 1966 NCAA basketball

championship with their all starting here this, this week with the, with the first ever

dot, Don Haskins, the first ever five blacks as the starters. And it was funny because I watched that movie, and I'm completely and totally into it. And they get to one of the final games. And you hear the public address announced, or else, and they show them, and I went, oh, my God, it's Ralph Stranges.

Oh, yeah, Ralph. Ralph used to used to be the, the play by play guy for the Dallas stars, who we knew really well. Yeah. And it was like, oh my God, Ralph, yeah, I had no idea he was in it.

It's like, oh my gosh, Ralph.

And remember the Titans, you know, you can sit there and go, well, the exact accuracy of it, you can go through that. But they were all, they made good movies. They were all really, really, really, really, really, really good movie, invincible. Yeah.

Not up, you know, with the Mark Wahlberg, right, was a, was a, you know, was a great movie. And you look at all these things. You're just like, wow, they just don't make him the same today, but can movie theaters do it, or does it take somebody like a Taylor Sheridan who can say, I wish to do this.

“Yeah, give me creative control and I'll do it, right?”

We aren't right. Radio.

We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently, and Gary McNamara.

We are Red Eye Radio. He's her currently, and I'm Gary McNamara. Now the best Oscar headline actually came from the Babylon B. Yeah. I'm already laughing, I haven't even seen it.

Trump snubbed again at Oscars for role in home alone too. And who, and has the picture of him with the thumbs up? Yeah, who was it that deleted that scene? Remember? Somebody deleted that scene?

Yes. First term. Yeah. I can't remember. I'm going to say she was in that work.

Yeah. Yeah. [MUSIC PLAYING] This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. The Dan Bontino show.

Dan, I missed you all.

“I've got so much content bottled of my head.”

I got a lot of stuff. This is the kind of stuff. It's real. May not hear this anywhere else. There's a lot of stuff to talk about that.

You think it's going to open a lot of eyes. And a lot of ignorators are going to get shut down. And a bold perspective, no one else can offer. They are freaking out. It's the comeback.

Everyone's been waiting for. Lovers, haters, friends, supporters to track is you're all welcome. I want to hear it all. The Dan Bontino show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

See you there.