The Daily Blast: Trump Hit by Brutal Fox Poll as Aides Scramble: “He’s in a Bad Mood”

started a Shopify app.

I'll tell you the first day of Shopify.

The platform makes me no problem.

“I have many problems, but the platform is not one of them.”

I feel that Shopify is a platform that can be optimized. Everything is super integrated and balanced. And the time and the money that I can't invest in there. For all of them, in WaxTomb. Now, let's test the Shopify.de.

This is the daily blast from the new Republic, produced and presented by the DSR network. I'm your host, Greg Sargent. Donald Trump pays close attention to Fox News polling, surely he'll see the latest one from Fox and it's a real doozy. His numbers on the economy are indescribably awful.

And the poll also shows that Democrats have the advantage over Republicans on the economy for the first time in many years, a real milestone. All this comes as several new reports suggest Trump knows he's in real trouble. He's having more perges of top staff and his top lieutenant's are feverishly searching for a midterm strategy.

GLE at Morris, who runs the strength and numbers sub-stack, has been arguing for some time that Trump's numbers are much worse than our mainstream discourse allows. So we're talking to him about all this today.

Elliott, I'm always good to have you on.

Hey, thanks for having me back, Greg. So let's start with this new Fox News poll. It has Trump's approval on the economy at 34% of voters nationally with 66% disapproving. I'll do the math, that's two thirds disapproving. His approval on inflation is even worse.

It's at 28% with 72% disapproving, which is almost three quarters.

“Elliott, can you put that in context for us how bad are those numbers?”

So Greg, great question. The first thing I did was I looked up Joe Biden's approval rating on the same question. Joe Biden bottomed out at a minus 32 net approval rating. That's the difference between his approval and disapproval in this survey. That was in May of 2023.

That's like when inflation was at eight, 10% and people were really stressed out about prices. Donald Trump hit minus 32 in this polling today. That's the net rating for his approval on the economy. So if you're like getting lost in the numbers, I think that's some really useful context.

Donald Trump's numbers on the economy, the thing that he won the 2024 election on, are as bad as Joe Biden's were during the peak inflation crisis of 2022-2023. Amazing. And let's talk about those inflation numbers. I don't think I've seen anything quite like this.

28% approving, 72% disapproving. Again, nearly three quarters of the country disapproving of Trump on inflation, the issue that is easily one of the top two or three for people. Yeah, and this is kind of the same thing, right? Donald Trump won the 2024 election on getting prices down and getting the economy moving after COVID.

“Arguably, it was already doing that, but let's just grant him that that's why he won.”

He's at minus 44 on this in the Fox News survey on net. In my polling, he's at minus 46. So it's not like this is an outlier number.

Basically, three-fourths of the public doesn't like how the president is handling inflation.

That is consequential. That's the thing he won on if he's that low on inflation's number one issue. And like, what is this White House even doing if that's where they're ending up on this question? Well, we're going to talk about that in the second, but there's a real kill shot in the Fox poll. It finds that Democrats are favored over Republicans on the economy for the first time since 2010. 52% picked Democrats and 48% picked Republicans.

And on prices, again, here, it's even worse, 54% favorite Democrats versus 46% who favor Republicans. Elliott, we've been told for a very long time that Democrats are in deep trouble because voters prefer Republicans on a range of matters. This seems to up in that.

No, what do you thoughts on all that? You know, Greg, I looked up the Republican in Democratic Party's numbers on the economy for 2024. Okay, these numbers come from Gallup. Gallup found that on the question of which party was quote, "better able to keep America prosperous?"

I know slightly different than who do you trust on the economy, but that's the question wording they use. On that question, the Republican Party had a six percentage point advantage going into the 2020 for election. So this Fox News poll shows what a 15/16 percentage point swing in my survey out this month in April.

I do want to talk about your varicite poll because it showed something similar in a bigger sense, too. You found that the Republican Party is now more disliked than the Democratic Party is. The Democrats are at 45% approval to 48% disapproval. Not great, but you know, pretty close to parity, maybe. But the Republican Party is at 39% approval to 55% approval.

And I thought fascinating number from your poll. Democrats are 11 points ahead of Republicans on who looks out for the middle class. It's now hard to dismiss what we're seeing here because the pattern is starting to really emerge. Democrats are taking the lead or gaining the advantage on the economy. Now it's not just disapproval of Trump and O people also hate Democrats.

It's voters now starting to look to Democrats as the better party on this issue.

Is that basically what's happening?

“Yeah, that's what I see and there was a lot of hand ringing about the 2024 election after the fact”

why Kamala Harris lost the Donald Trump and a lot of the let's just call it like strategist class. I guess Greg was talking a lot about how the Democrats were too left leaning on this social issue or that economic proposal or what have you, but actually what the political science says and what our polling said at the time was that voters were just really upset at the ruling party about prices by the daily cost of like normal economic life in America.

And if that was the case then your inference should have been from all along that as the economy, I guess failed to recover to the level that Americans are expecting it as prices stayed elevated and wages didn't catch up. That voters would turn that anger against the Republican party. The party that came in charge. I think that this polling is showing that that trend is really coming true now. Yeah, and this is not unimportant. I really want to underscore that like

the entire pond class and the entire strategist class with some exceptions, but basically that whole

group of people overred the significance of Trump's 2024 win. And I don't think there's been any real

“accountability or admission of that fact. It's very clear right now that that's what happened.”

Now I don't want to get too confident or anything about democratic chances. Anything could happen in these midterms. You know, maybe Trump comes back. Maybe I don't know. And maybe the numbers for Democrats are bad enough that he'll mute their win in the midterms. But still, I would like to just have it a little more broadly understood that Trump's 2024 win was, as you say, you know, not the seismic shift in the electorate that

we were told it was and that there was a massive over interpretation. Your thoughts on that? Yeah, be great. He only won by a point in a half. I mean, the guy that the guy won by three times less of a margin than Joe Biden did. He barely won the swing states as well. He won Pennsylvania by what a boy in a half. We were writing this at the time. This was not like the big electoral victory for maga, Trumpism, that that he wanted the media to believe.

Tens of millions of medical claims are denied every year, yet little scholarly attention has been paid to their scale or impact on patients health and financial security. In her new book, coverage denied, health policy professor Miranda Yavor offers a sobering account of the ways that coverage denials damage patient health and exacerbate inequalities along income, education and racial lines.

Using rich interview material and original survey data, Yavor draws critical attention to the

many medical claims denied by health and sugars every year, shining a necessary light on the inequitable US health care system. Cambridge University Press brings you coverage denied by Miranda Yavor. Out now, buy your copy today at Cambridge.org/coveragedenight. I am Charisa and my experience in all entrepreneurs starts a shopping trip. I recommend shopping trips on the first day, and the platform makes me no problem.

I have a lot of problems, but the platform is not one step away. I have the feeling that shopping trip is a platform that can only be optimized. Everything is super simple, integrated and balanced. And the time and the money that I can't invest there is no other way around. For Alam in Vax-Tung, yet costen those tests on Shopify.de. To stay up to date on all the news that

“you need to know, there's no better place than right here on a DSR network. And there's no”

better way to enjoy the DSR network than by becoming a member. Members enjoying ad-free listening experience, access to our discord community, exclusive content, early episode access, and more.

That's code at DSR 26 at the DSR network.com/buy. Thank you and enjoy the show.

There are some signs that team Trump knows they're in trouble. CNN reports that a bunch of Trump advisors are plotting this new push centered on messaging the midterms as a choice between the two parties and not as a direct referendum on Trump's presidency. I'm going to quote from the CNN report quote, "The strategy is driven by internal polling showing the Republicans

“still hold a trusted banage over the Democratic Party on some key issues, even as Americans have”

sowered on Trump and his performance overall." Well, I don't even think that these advisors can count on that. They can't count on Republicans necessarily holding a trusted banage over the Democrats at this point, can they? It really just depends on what survey question you're picking. Yeah, sure Republicans have a trusted banage over immigration, but if you ask Americans who they're going to vote for, they still say they're going to vote for the Democratic Party in

those same survey numbers, right? So, unless the Trump White House and the RNC have some plan

for materially changing opinion about what issues people say are most important to them,

over indexing on this stuff where Republicans have a trusted banage on immigration and board of security just is not a solution to their current problems. Their problems right now is that the American people don't trust the Republican Party to handle their most important issues, like period of full stop and over indexing on things that aren't the most important issue is not going to change that. So, let's talk about the battle for the House. What is your latest

“polling find on that and what's your general sense of it? The House, I think, is probably a”

foregone conclusion for the Democrats if I'm being honest with you, Greg. I mean, the generic ballot

and our survey is D+7. There's a pretty predictable historical pattern where the party out of

powered gains ground as the midterm school logs of the party out of powers. The Democrats, we should expect them to gain at least a couple of points in the generic ballot over the next couple of months. And the Democrats are emerging from this referendum in Virginia with maybe a net add in their number of seats from the redistricting wars that Donald Trump started next year. If you redo the House elections from 2024, just with the new lines, it looks like Democrats will actually have gained

one seat from that, which means Republicans would have only had a three seat advantage, I think, to an or two hundred and nineteen, so two seat advantage. Look, the average swing in a midterm

“normally without a president at 20% on prices is for that party to lose 26 seats in the House.”

With a president at a 35, 36% approval reading, that loss of seats goes up to close or like 35, 36. This is a level of like political gravity that the Republican party is not and really any conceivable electoral simulation going to be able to dig itself out of. I would put this at like 95, 96% chance. I'm I'm almost sure Democrats will take the House and what what are the averages have on the generic ballot right now? Our average at 50 plus one has the Democrats up five and a half

points right now. So we probably need to see that swell a little, right? And you expect that to happen due to historical patterns? Yeah, I expect that number to increase, but even if it was just plus five, we're still talking about Democrats flipping, you know, 10 to 15 seats, which is more than they need, they just need two or three. Right, exactly. Well, so there are other signs that Trump knows that he's in big trouble here, political reports that it's plausible that more

purges of top officials are coming. A Republican Senator anonymously says to political quote, "He's in a bad mood, so he's letting a lot of them go," speaking of people around Trump, the Senator continued, "He's preparing to really let a lot of them go," close quote. Yeah, I mean, you know, Trump looks like he's in a bit pretty pretty foul mood these days and I got to think a lot of these numbers that they're looking at privately as well as publicly

explains that we are seeing people start to drop out of the administration as well. I expect that to continue. Is that the sort of thing that can help though? It sort of seems like that's not really going to do much. It's just not what the American people are concerned about. And I'll just say one thing, there's also this idea in the Republican Party right now that maybe Donald Trump will do some sort of like presidential campaign style tour of America to juice

turnout among those, you know, lower turnout likely had Republican voters. Those types of voters who turned up in 2024 for him. That actually is a good idea that trying to get turnout up among those

all these special elections when you just have the high likely had turnout voters show up.

“But those are Democrats winning by, you know, 15 points on average better than Kamala Harris did,”

so that's not going to fly. But the thing is, right, Greg, Donald Trump is having what like three press conferences a day in the White House, where he's just sleeping through them. He does not have the juice to do a campaign across America, presidential election style campaign. It'll probably kill the guy. So not to be too ordered. I just don't think that that's a workable strategy. And the fact that they're throwing out all these different ideas about how they might win, different things

they could try. There's like throwing, should it the wall to see what sticks? That shows that they

really acknowledge the depth of the problem that they have. Yeah, he really does seem to lack the juice to pull something like that. Often, in fact, we have some numbers that really get at that as well. In the Fox poll, 55% say Trump doesn't have the mental sadness to be president. That's a solid maturity versus only 45% who say he does. And in your poll, 55% support and pitching Trump kind of coincidentally. So this is really a very clear situation where a solid

majority of the country just doesn't think this guy should be in the White House. Shouldn't be in the Oval Office. It's not fit for the job. It's just fucking it up and needs to go. Isn't that

“sort of the basic size of it at bottom? Yeah, I think the basic shape of this problem is that the”

president has spent a year and a half now campaigning on four or five major policies that the American people don't like, right? Just a name, like mass deportations for people have been here 20 years for, you know, regular working families. People don't like that. The tariffs people don't like that. Rollback and ACA subsidies. People don't like that tax cuts for the rich. People don't like that. And a war in Iran. That is that people don't like that. And this has been, you know,

day after day coverage that the Trump administration is is giving freely. They do press conferences about this drawing intention to these unpopular policies. If you do that, over to over again for 16 or 14 months, whatever it's been. And you're like the public face of all these negative

“negative policies, there's going to be backlash against that. That's really what we should expect.”

Great. So just to close this out, we've had a number of polls that show Trump's overall approval, not just on the economy, overall approval in the 30s. The New York Times polling averages, which are not really polluted by bad data, have him at 39, which is not where he's been in averages for the time, just done by the times for the last year and a half, mostly. Is that low enough to make the Senate getable for Democrats? What's your reading on that? Where does

Trump have to be approvalized to get to four seats, which Democrats need to net? These are very tough races. They're running in some very hard states. What's your sense of it? Where does Trump have to be for Democrats to win the Senate? Greg, the median Senate seat, lean stores, Republicans buy about seven or eight percentage points. So the Democrats would need to lead to win the house by about seven or eight percent to have an equal shot at winning control of the Senate

50 seats in a good year, with like good candidates, good engagement, whatever, a year, like a midterm year. Democrats right now, they have to win 51 seats. So like add a couple of points onto that. That means maybe D plus 10, D plus 9, they are favored to win the Senate today in our survey. They're a D plus 7 on average. They're at D plus 5. So imagine the Democrats gain a couple of points before the midterms. Then they're like on the precipice of taking back the Senate on average.

Donald Trump is at 37 percent approval in our average today. So like if he gets down to 35 34, you're at the point where Democrats are taking back the Senate. And that is very plausible. Folks make sure to check out G. Eliot Morris's great sub-stack, strength and numbers,

and he does his own polling, which we talked about today. Eliot always great to talk to you.

Thanks so much for coming on. Thanks very much, Greg.