99% Invisible
99% Invisible

100 Objects #17: M43 Field Jacket

2h ago41:236,759 words
0:000:00

Articles of Interest host Avery Trufelman joins Roman to tell the incredible story of the American military’s jacket problem: How should the military outfit its soldiers to make them as safe and effec...

Transcript

EN

It's the fall of 1918, the Great War is raging.

More than a million American men have found themselves in the Muse Organ Offensive on the Western Front.

β€œIt remains to this day, the deadliest campaign in our military history, and the conditions were horrendous.”

So it's rainy, it's muddy, it's freezing, and this is the beginning of trench warfare. These soldiers are hanging out in ditches in the mud, people are dying everywhere, it's miserable. Avery Truffman is the host of Articles of Interest, a show about fashion and design. So when she thinks about this miserable, awful war, she thinks about what the soldiers are wearing. They are in wool overcoats, which, you know, if you're going on a walk and it's cold outside,

it will can be a really great fabric. If you're a soldier fighting and running for your life, a giant wool overcoat is horrible, because it gets really wet, and it gets really heavy, and then you want to take it off, and then suddenly you're freezing, you just have one wool blanket. That is usually wet and dirty, and then they were trapped in these awful things. The very thing that was supposed to keep these soldiers safe and warm, instead, caused a lot of harm.

Because back then, the military didn't consider fashion a technology. They were focused on weapons, artillery, supply lines, communication. They didn't think of clothing as something to help or hurt the war effort. It was just what soldiers wore. And beyond that, the American military went into World War I totally unprepared for the climate.

We had fought a war abroad before, the Spanish-American War, which was like a warm weather war.

And that's when we started wearing khaki, but we had never fought in the wilds of northern Europe before.

This is like extremely cold, exotic climate for the United States, and we didn't really know what we were doing yet on a large scale. So a lot of soldiers suffered.

β€œDid the military realize that they had made a mistake issuing these coats to soldiers?”

Absolutely. Once the war ended, we've got to find a better jacket. But after the Great War, they were like, "Let's not focus on war right now." We're never going to have a big war ever again. That was really bad.

Yeah. It was the war to end all wars. The war to end all wars. Yeah. So that was a weird experiment.

They didn't think that they needed to revisit or redesign such a jacket for such an expensive war in Europe. When it proved true that we did end up fighting another giant war in Europe, it was time to revisit this jacket problem. The jacket problem.

β€œHow should the American military outfit its soldiers to make them as safe and effective as possible?”

And how should such a jacket be developed? And underneath that, what happens when a symbol of military might get stripped of its connection to the military and hits the streets? From 99% invisible in BBC Studios, this is a history of the United States in 100 objects. I'm Roman Mars.

Today, the incredible origin and evolution of the M43 Army Field jacket.

The field jacket changed what it meant to be a soldier and to look like a soldier. And it changed what we all wear every day, not only Americans, but all around the world. The United States military did not put their soldiers in wool overcoats because they thought it was the best technology. They did it because other countries put their soldiers in wool overcoats.

For more than a century, they just copied the current military superpower of the moment. You can see this very clearly in the Revolutionary War. We're basically dressing exactly like the British, just like they're wearing red. They're not. Then you see this in the Civil War, where we're actually dressing French. That was the superpower at the time.

And it's funny because when you look at it, we do kind of look like the soldiers from the Nutcracker. It's very, like, Johnty Little tin soldiers. But that's what we're imitating. We're imitating the French.

And then we had this really weird period, which is my favorite in military history, where we were imitating the Prussians. And we wore like bloomed hats and the helmets with the little spike on top. But we wore those. We just copied whoever was the global superpower at the time, and that was the way military

fashion worked. It was like we want to look like the powerful ones, and that decision was sort of made top down. So by 1941, it's clear that the U.S. is going to join World War II. And the military knows it needs a better jacket.

So how does it approach this problem? So there were a few kind of improvised solutions that were made.

This one general, general Parsons was like, my boys need something a little l...

to wear when they're going out. When it's just a little windy, and they don't want a full wool coat. And so what he did was he ordered like 300 golf jackets, like members only jackets. And he picked the parts he liked. And he was like, so these all together.

And then they made this golf jacket, which was like so cool.

So it's like a zip up jacket, basically.

It's like a windbreaker. It comes in like a khaki-ish color, little slip pockets on the side. It looks very modern. And this cool windbreaker became known colloquially as the Parsons jacket after general Parsons. All the soldiers wanted one, although they were terrible for soldiers.

If you raised your arm, your belly would get exposed, really didn't work. If it was a little cold outside, it was not a very pragmatic, practical, like soldier looking jacket. And so eventually all these battalions, one by one, were like, we want our version of the Parsons jacket.

β€œLike, can we make one for parachuting, can we make one for tankers?”

Can we make one that's lined for cold environments? And then the government is like issuing all these limited edition drops of this jacket

for all these different battalions.

And it is so impractical, it's like jacket chaos. Yeah. The effort to streamline this to make the one perfect jacket. So talk to me about how you take on that monumental task. This grand task was taken on by a professor named George Dorio.

He was a business professor at Harvard. He was an immigrant. He was French. And he was a high ranking official in the French military. And he was like, I can feel this war coming.

I'm probably going to be putting charge of some big thing because I'm a business professor and a veteran. And so he kind of decided to work in the logistics arm. He was like, I'll do this. So he volunteered himself.

He was like, they need someone who knows how to organize things. The funny thing is, George Dorio is not famous for his work in jacket organizing. He is famous for being the inventor of venture capital. This whole thing is a giant footnote in his life, which is, I mean, it's very funny. But this whole story is just like a fun fact about this guy.

Anyway, so he takes on whatever project the military needs help doing. And this big project that they present to him is like, OK, we need a jacket. We need one superior jacket that will look great. Work in every environment for every job that a soldier has to do. Huge task.

And Dorio does this amazing thing.

He starts working from first principles. Again, this sounds so obvious now, but before this, the military was just being like,

β€œwho's the most powerful military or what does some general want?”

This guy is like, well, what does keep people warm? You know, like, what does repel the rain? And even though the field of physiology was budding and, yeah, they're all these labs that Harvard that were putting students on treadmills and testing how much they could sweat and body heat retention, no one had done this to clothing yet.

He was like, well, let's spray water at this jacket. No, let's blow wind at this jacket. Let's use laboratories. Let's really figure out objectively what the best jacket is. And Dorio was so invested in finding the objectively greatest jacket that he was like,

"Human test subjects aren't even enough anymore because what's cold to you? What's warm to you?" So he ordered a copper dummy that was fitted out with sensors and then they put the dummy in the cold and in the heat and overnight and put different jackets on the dummy and tested, okay, which jacket keeps the dummy, the warmest, I mean, rigorous, rigorous, repeated

tests. Yeah. And the copper manic can have a name. Yes. The manic in his name was John C.

(laughs) Very important point. And this is what makes me live out, you know, he was like, what will make the boys the most comfortable? Like, how beautiful is that? It wasn't about emulating some other army.

It wasn't about what some high-ranking general wanted. It was about the people, the army of the people and like making sure they were comfortable and they were safe and they were protected and it just makes me feel like tear up a little. I'm like, this is what we were supposed to be doing the whole time. It's so cool.

And this was why I let the time to be like, we're going to treat clothes like a technology. This is as important as developing a tank or a bomb or anything else. This is military technology. Okay.

β€œSo after putting John C through, you know, rigorous testing, what did they find?”

They found that there is no one perfect jacket. They found that the best way to get different temperatures for different environments

Is to use a radical new concept called layering, which is like, want, want.

I could have told you that, but they discovered that. That's what they discovered.

β€œYeah, but you couldn't have told us that in 1941.”

I definitely could not have told you that because they were like, oh, we just have this one wool jacket and this one lighter jacket.

No, this was so revolutionary, this idea of layering.

The layers that George Dorio's team came up with included a liner for warmth, a parka for the cold and a waterproof shell for rain. It was all part of a system. And at the heart of this system was a jacket. It is a cotton, satin, olive, drab, floppy, field jacket for large cargo pockets to at the

hip, to at the breast. It's got adjustable cuffs. It's about hip length, draw strings around the waist so that you could tighten all the layers around yourself. It had this collar that you could turn up against the wind.

It had all these features, but it wasn't about the jacket. It was about like the layers of the jacket and the system of the jacket.

β€œAnd this, the scientific system of a jacket was called the M43.”

And the M stands for model 1943, year it was made, M43 jacket, which is a, you know,

a scientific name for this like piece of science. It was so radical looking. I mean, now it doesn't look so weird because all modern outdoor clothes look like this. They're all modular. They're all a little baggy.

They all have these different layers and hoods and elements and draw strings and stuff like that. This was so complete. I mean, this was alien. Early jackets came with instructions printed on the inside of like when it's raining,

put on your hood and tighten it with the draw strings. Yeah, it is kind of frumpy, like it, it's sort of like it's sort of born with wrinkles and wrinkles now. And it's not that the height's soldierly, you know, look. And you were supposed to live in this thing and it had been tested not only in the

laboratory, but they also took later prototypes of it out into the field, into a battle in Italy, they sent it to a thousand troops and got their feedback. And, you know, the pockets were specifically designed to fit a ration pack. You know, you could really live out of these things. They were sort of perfectly designed for the life of the average foot soldier.

Yeah, yeah. I mean, the product testing with actual soldiers in the field and also the focus on function and comfort seems completely new. Super new, super duper new. It was not about looks. It was not a costume, it was scientific, democratic and it treated the soldier as kind

of this new job in this new kind of war. So, it's called M43, which means it was developed in 1943. Was this this eureka moment? They found the jacket. Therefore, it was outfitted with everyone.

And therefore, we won the war hooray, or you'd think you'd think you'd be really yay.

β€œDid it, Georgia, Dorio, you found the perfect jacket?”

Nope, nope, nope, because this is the part where we encountered the villain of our story. And his name was General Robert McGowan, little John. General Little John. And General Little John is a career soldier. He went to West Point, you know, he played it all completely by the book.

He rose up the ranks and he ended up as the quartermaster for the European Theater

of Operations. And the quartermaster is basically the one in charge of logistics.

They're in charge of boots, beans, and bullets, getting supplies to the boys in Europe. And in 1943, this meant England and Italy. And like pretend we haven't talked about the M43, right? Okay, yeah. So in 1941 and '42, the military has the Parsons jacket, which is very cool looking,

but not practical, in different divisions, want their own versions. Okay, so we're back in jacket chaos early on. Little John is over in Europe, and he sees all this jacket chaos. And he's like, I'm going to fix it. He doesn't really know that the government is planning this giant.

It's like Manhattan Project of jackets and that man, yeah. He doesn't know. He doesn't, he doesn't realize that. And he's doing it the old school way where it's like, I'm a high ranking general. I'm going to take matters in my own hands. I'm going to make a jacket.

And I'm going to make the one jacket that every soldier will need. So he functionally likes the look of the British battle dress jacket. And based on that, he goes to a factory in England and he's like, make me one of those with a few little tweaks. And he makes admittedly a very sharp looking jacket. I love it.

It's like a wool jacket, but it's short-wasted. It's very tight. It's very dignified. It's very general Eisenhower.

Yeah.

It's like a very tight fitting elegant jacket. Yeah. And for him, he's like, oh great. Now this is like a more practical version of the wool jacket. Soldiers don't have to change back and forth between their fancy dress and their battle dress.

This will be the one jacket to rule them all. He calls it the ETO jacket, ETO standing for European theater of operations. And it has like a tie. It's not compared to compared to what was happening with all the jacket chaos. It is more practical, but when you know that the M43 jacket is like secretly being developed

in a laboratory, the ETO jacket kind of looks like a joke. Yeah. Because, you know, he's a general. So like his version of a versatile jacket is you stand out on a battlefield occasionally and then you go to a dinner occasionally or something like that.

You know what I mean? It's not like a trench or jumping out of a plane or--

β€œYeah, I think it'd been a while since he'd been like boots on the ground.”

You didn't really know what had been there a lot of change in this time. And so, but what is his thinking? Like he must have some recognition that this is not the most practical jacket in the world. So what is little John like about this? Yeah, so a big part of his logic, which I am sympathetic to, this is a time World War II.

It's a huge draft.

There are men pouring into the European theater who have never fought before.

They've never known this kind of discipline. And to little John, he sees the jacket as this soldier making tool. Like, you want to be a soldier? You got to dress like a soldier in the same way that's like, you got to make your bed. You got to stand up straight.

You got to wear this nice jacket. You got to come correct. You got to look good. You know, this is not about being comfortable or at war. And also, I think a lot of it was presenting the American military to a European audience.

β€œLike, look, look in good, look in classy.”

So this ambition does not a villain make. No. What makes General Little John a villain? What makes a villain a villain is vindicted this.

And what's really fitting is I met this incredible military historian named Joshua

Kerner. Kerner is really, really into archives and research almost obsessively. And he's uncovered a lot of this story of the field jacket that I'm about to tell you. But basically, Kerner was going through old documents and realized General Little John did something really terrible.

So what did General Little John do? Little John first catches wind of the M43 jacket. He was like, these look sloppy. What is this? What is this thing that the government back at home is making without consulting

me? My jackets are so much better than this frontpy ugly stuff. He like makes a vow than in there that he will stop the M43 jacket from ever reaching the Wider military. Wow.

So how does he go about stopping this? He hasn't tremendous amount of power. He's in charge of all the supplies going into the European theater. And as the M43 jacket is slowly getting rolled out, and Dorio's like, here you go. Here's this jacket that I lovingly made, and it's perfect.

Little John's like, no, get those away from me over my dead body, never.

Our man of science, Dorio, is begging Little John, like, please, please take these jackets.

β€œYou know, like winter, winter is coming, and you have to order these in advance.”

And this is a serious winter, and he just refuses to order them. In fact, their reach is a point where M43 jackets are like packed up ready to go to Europe. And he was like, no, we got it. I made a jacket. Like, we're just going to wear my jacket over here.

We don't need that. And he's making excuses. He's dragging his feet. He's putting it off for so long. And he's not really being transparent about, like, I hate these jackets.

He's like, no, no, no, thanks, you know, we don't need these. So in the fall of 1944, it doesn't seem like the war is slowing down anytime soon. It's expanding throughout Europe. And all the quartermasters throughout the European theater of operations under Little John are turning to Little John.

And they're like, hey, we don't have those new jackets that we heard about. We're probably unprepared. You can actually like, a corner found this letter from someone to Little John. And you can see how they have to tip to around him. He's like, just maybe possibly it will be colder than you think.

I know that you think you don't need these jackets, but maybe you do. It's like, and he, you can tell what a tyrant is. Like, no one feels comfortable being like, please order the jackets. Finally, in the fall of 1944, Little John gives in the undeniable superiority of the M43 jacket.

Yeah, Little John acquiesces, and I was like, okay, fine, fine.

Let the jackets in.

I don't even care, whatever.

β€œBut all that gear is waiting back in the United States.”

So it takes months to reach the troops in Europe. Most troops will not begin receiving M43 jackets and adequate sleeping bags on footwear and all the other stuffed Oreo designed until January 1945. They had to go through like, you know, September, October, November, December, freezing. So by the time winter hits, they're in ETO jackets, they're in, like, dress jackets.

And it's, it's horrible. They were freezing. Many of them developed trench foot, which is duh, disgusting. Like, I don't want to gross anybody out, but like, your skin falls off. It's nasty.

And this is World War II. Communication technology has gotten really good. Like, people know Americans are getting notes from their sons, being like, mom, dad, I'm freezing out here. I'm given inadequate jackets.

There's a sense of outrage that is building back at home of like, why aren't our boys being taken care of? They're going to freeze to death out here. They start complaining. They turn to the press.

They turn to the New York Times on the Washington Post and this becomes a massive scandal. It's called the Cold Weather Crisis. It's a huge deal. I, you know, Joshua Kerner brought me into the quartermaster archives and we were looking at old newspapers that were covering this.

There's only page four of the Washington Post. This is not like style section stuff. It's just unignorable.

β€œSo, it's a little John ever get his come up and it's like, does he ever get blame for this?”

No. Like, no one pins this on General Little John at all. He completely gets away with it. How does he manage that? Because it's great to be friends with Dwight D. Eisenhower, who essentially ran interference

for his buddy from West Point, and, you know, Eisenhower also loved the ETO jacket. He understood where his friend was coming from, and he issues a press moratorium. You can't say anything bad about the ETO jackets and he's like, this is for morale, you know, we have to support the troops and we can't gang up on leadership, but we all know why. It was friend, nepotism.

It's a friend nepotism. Yeah. The M43 Field jacket finally makes his way to soldiers in Europe in 1945. No thanks to Little John. What happens next?

Everybody is wearing these amazing jackets, and the military is cranking these things out,

especially because we are in the thick of World War II, and you and I both know as people of the future that there will be an atomic bomb and it will end World War II. But no one knows that the real Manhattan Project is actually happening, and most people in the military did not know that. It's widely believed that this war is just going to go on for years.

Yeah. Like, even after the theater of Europe is sort of one. Yeah. People thought we were going to invade Japan.

β€œLike, this was going to be like five more years, you know?”

Just like outfitting soldiers to go into Japan and occupy that is best they possibly could. Yeah.

Again, the scale of this draft is massive, there's like 12 million men, it's huge.

And so every domestic manufacturing company in the United States is cranking out these jackets, stockpiling them for this future war that's going to go on and on and on and on and then it ends really suddenly and really herrificly. And in the wake of the destruction and the existential crisis created by the atomic bomb in way lesser, way lower on the scale of problems.

But still a problem is the fact that the United States government has all these clothes they made. They made so, so many clothes, like it warehouses and warehouses and warehouses. And so what do they do? They got to get rid of it, they got to get rid of it as quickly as possible.

And fun fact, the person in charge of getting rid of it was none other than general Robert McAllen, little John, which is so funny. And so this is where military surplus stores come in and granted we had had military surplus stores before, but they were little, they were like little specialty stores.

We had never had industrial scale mass manufacturing cranking out millions of jackets on

this scale before. And for a generation of Americans that had grown up during the Great Depression and didn't have big closets, this was amazing, like the military surplus store, most of the stuff had never been worn and they would like stock these things for a song.

It's just how everybody dressed, everybody dressed this way.

It wasn't even considered a style, it wasn't considered like, oh, this military style

β€œstuff, it was just like where you went to get your basics.”

Where there was Walmart, there was the military surplus store. And now they have this scientifically tested jacket that can serve a lot of people and a lot of different climates and it's actually really great. Yeah, now it's like this jacket that was the height of sophistication is available for everyone for really cheap.

I will say so much of menswear comes from this era, whatever we're like, oh, this is classic menswear. It's military surplus style, you can ask any brand, even ones that just seem like they make normal basic clothes, they will all tell you that it comes from the military. It's the blueprint.

This is what's considered the bedrock of classic menswear style in the 20th century. And yet the military is still making clothes and still scientifically iterating on them. The evolution doesn't stop. Yeah, because worst of the tough. They just keep coming.

β€œIt's now the mid-1960s, the draft is an effect for the Vietnam War, hundreds of thousands”

of men who have never been to war are getting turned into soldiers.

Part of that transformation still includes the field jacket. They're wearing a new version of it, the souped up version called the M65. It has a rad new feature is like a rolled up hood and it's got velcro on the sleeve. But the interesting thing is now there is this sort of pipeline where the military is making new clothes and sort of ending up in surplus stores, almost immediately.

It's really interesting. Like we've never had this before, where anyone can just kind of waltz in and buy something that is or looks pretty similarly to what soldiers are actually wearing. Like all around the country, this is a weird moment in American fashion history. At a weird moment in American military history.

Yeah.

β€œAnd it is what is strictly like interesting about this moment is that people have the ability”

to look like soldiers at the same time that soldiers are looking like soldiers.

The same clothes, exact same clothes. When our collective feeling about those wars is really complicated. Really, really complicated. And the thing that's so fascinating is as civilians and soldiers kind of start to dress like. They have not dissimilar opinions. The draft was still going on.

People were being drafted into Vietnam who didn't want to be there. Like the military civilian divide is not a gaping crevasse, like we might think of it today. So a lot of soldiers return home from Vietnam still wearing their field jackets. And you start to see them wear their field jackets to protest. And then they start defacing their jackets with peace signs and patches.

And this is this is really new because again, after World War II, these have just been like standard jackets. You know, the stuff in the military surplus stores are like good clothes, like nice quality clothes. They weren't making a statement about the military.

They were just basics. And now the people who are subverting the field jacket know what they're doing. They're taking the military's imagery away from them. They turn it into a symbol of the anti-war movement. And it was so offensive to deface these things and draw on them in this way.

Yeah. You know, this adoption becomes like so complete that in a way, seeing a person in a military jacket indicates a radical almost, you know, it becomes like an outsider. It is not a buttoned up general little John soldier is a different type of character. Yeah.

Yeah. Exactly. After the draft ends in 1973, the jacket straight up doesn't mean soldier anymore. It means like young, disaffected, probably, socially unstable, young veteran. Like you can see this in Cerbaco and taxi driver.

Like it replaces the denim or the leather jacket. It's like what tough guys wear, it becomes radical. It's like the shocking punk thing. And so what does this mean for the field jacket like this is as described, like the most perfect military piece of fashion that's ever been created.

Now it is associated with totally different things.

Yeah.

β€œI mean, it essentially becomes fashion, which, I mean, that's the stereotypical way that fashion”

works, right, like outsiders and rebels and punks wear it.

And then as people start seeing it in like Cerbaco and taxi driver, it like starts to edge into the mainstream. And, you know, in the 70s, you really start really starts seeing like the epification of the field jacket. Like you can see Woody Allen wearing it in Annie Hall as he's like waiting to go see an

independent movie film forum and like Dustin Hoffman is a dad on the upper west side wearing it in Cramer versus Cramer. And Army surplus stores realize that this is now fashion, this field jacket. And they start building themselves as more of a fashion outpost. And the field jacket gets even further from its military origins.

Cerbless stores begin to cater directly to this fashion crowd. They die their field jackets, style them with belts, even draw on them. Soon the trend goes beyond the traditional surplus industry, who teaks start popping up with a specific purpose of putting their own spin on military surplus. And one of these people is a lady named Patricia Ziegler, she's an artist in San Francisco

in the 70s and one day her husband came home from a reporting trip to Australia. And when he came back, he was wearing this British Burma jacket. A military surplus jacket from Australia. I noticed it right away, not because it looked military, it looked really safari record. It was kind of like exotic and swash buckling looking.

And she was like maybe other people would want to buy it too. So they found a way to buy 500 surplus Spanish paratrooper jacket. But you know, they're like these weird old used jackets. They didn't really sell until Patricia started styling them a little bit. I put when I'm now with the sleeves rolled up in the collar turned up.

And I put on one with tight jeans and belted it and we sold over a hundred. So she went home and she took two of these shirts apart. And she sewed them together and she turned them into a dress. Some other ones, I took off the apple that's made a waistband, took off the arms. I said, doing our part for a disarmament here.

And we made a skirt. And so it melted, oh, we've got a business that got to find a place to open a store. So they found this tiny store that was 400 square feet. And they were like, this will be our thing. We'll take military surplus from all over the world.

And we will put our own spin on it and make a fashionable, adventurous little bohemian line of clothes. And they open their store in 1978. And they call it banana republic. Not crazy. It's amazing.

So banana republic started as a sort of an international army surplus store.

Yeah, basically. But early on in the 70s, Patricia realized that they were running up against

a fundamental problem with their business model, which is that it was the late 70s and early 80s. And the global supply of military surplus was dwindling. And like this is a good thing. You only get military surplus when you have a giant military and wars.

β€œAnd huge groups of people that you have to clothe, like by the 80s, the United States”

is supply of their own military surplus was kind of dwindling. And slowly other countries were like joining the fold of liberal capitalist democracies and ending their drafts. And you know, like this is a great problem for the world. It was very horrible for Patricia.

She would be up late at night being like, I don't think we have enough clothes. This stuff is getting harder to find. This is like a huge, huge problem. Yeah, especially if you business built on international army surplus, this is a huge problem. They were like, I think we have to start making these clothes.

I think we have to start making them from scratch. And that was part of the reason that they were acquired by the gap in 1983. And that's how you start getting stores popping up all over the world, keeping the ethos of the original store. But they were mass producing new versions of surplus, including the field jacket.

Like, the gap is making versions of field jackets with banana republic. Yeah, yeah. So the evolution of this goes into eventually like, you get a banana republic that has sort of no association with army surplus whatsoever.

You would never have guessed that association.

β€œSo now, where does that leave us in terms of the field jacket?”

Like, where would you find a field jacket today? Literally everywhere, everywhere, everywhere. Like, product makes a version of it, old navy makes a version of it. Sometimes I like to look on the street and be like, how many of these are military jackets.

Even if they're not dark green, it's like, oh, a four pocket jacket with some...

of cinching in the middle.

β€œIt's like, that's just a design of a jacket that works really, really well.”

I was just sent a bunch of clothes from a new designer and they're like, check out our designs. And it was a field jacket. I was like, are you kidding me? They are everywhere these days. It's a classic.

It's barely even associated with the military anymore. It's just a jacket. The field jacket started as a tool for the military to win wars. It became the symbol of a soldier. It evolved from there to something radical.

And then became something stripped of meaning altogether, because it's just a great looking jacket. And the field jacket endures today, not just because of how good it looks, but how well it

β€œfunctions in the scientific and thoughtful way it was designed.”

Yeah, this, in addition to the fact that you've seen everywhere in every brand makes a version of it, the fact that this was a jacket that was designed and tested in a laboratory, specifically on John C. the copper dummy, this is just how clothes are made now. You know, we like hand imagine a world without this, outdoor brands, especially live and die by testing.

So I got to visit REI, they have testing facilities for their gear that are so similar to the kinds of testing facilities that the government used, like they have a cold room, a rain room, they even had a mannequin covered with sensors. It's like their own version of John C. And so the interesting thing is like, beyond the practicality, this is a look, this like crunchy, technical style was invented by the

field jacket, this like scientifically tested looking gear. We all dress like technical soldiers now. And it's not just in the United States, we swallowed up everybody else's outdoor culture because it works and it looks cool. So in the battle between George Dorio and General Little John, even though General Little

John was not blamed and really took no fall, he was fighting for a world that was dying. You know, no one was going to dress in suits anymore, not soldiers, not any of us. We live in Dorio's world of scientific testing.

When you were first doing this or at some point in the process, when you were talking

me about the field jacket, you were like, this might be the thing that makes me the proudest to be an American. It is. So I do like that this was a moment when the U.S. government took clothing really, really, seriously and made really good stuff.

And when our domestic manufacturing was very robust and we made these beautiful jackets that were accessible to everybody, that's point one, I really love that. And I love that they embody the democratic ideals of not looking like a European country or serving a king, it was just about individual soldier comfort. But I also love what it gave to America, I mean, people want to military surplus stores

and they bought these jackets and they bought, you know, tents and backpacks and other things. And they went hiking, you know, this is before outdoor stores were prominent, you know, it helped expand our relationship with the outdoors. So it was mitigated through these clothes that were suddenly available to everybody. And I love that moment in the 1970s and I think about it a lot now that the people

who were belly against the war, you know, the jacket was a very strong anti war statement, but it wasn't anti soldier, you know, they were sort of all wearing it together. Yeah, yeah. Speaking out against the actions of the government, but not of their fellow citizens, it's truly a jacket for the people. And then, of course, it's a, it's a great design.

β€œSo I, I just think this is the best thing since sliced bread.”

This is like the most amazing invention. And the fact that it's so incredible and we don't even notice it, as you know, it's like that's the sign of great design. It is.

I had never thought about it before.

Well, this has been a really fun tour through the field jacket. Thank you so much, every achievement I really appreciate it. Thanks, Roman. The story of the field jacket comes from Avery's fantastic show articles of interest. She devoted the entire sixth season to gear and the field jacket is just one part of it.

The whole thing is amazing. Check it out at articlesofinterest.co. Special thanks to costume historian Charles McFarlane for his research on the topic. A history of the United States and a hundred objects is a production of 99% of visible and BBC studios.

It's hosted and curated by me, Roman Mars. This episode was produced by Isabelle Angel.

Our series producers are Priscilla Alibi, Brenna Daldorf, and LA Lightfoot.

Our associate producer is Isaac Fisher.

β€œThis series was edited by Annie Brown and Courtney Harrell.”

Mixed by Iver Manley, fact checking by Amy Bracken.

Our theme song is by Swan Real.

β€œFrom 99% of visible, our executive producer is Kathy too, from BBC studios, our executive”

producers are Annie Brown and Courtney Harrell.

Our production coordinator is Shan Palet. And the production manager is Mabel Fennigan Wright, our work by Stefan Lawrence. 99% of visible is part of the serious XM podcast family, headquartered in beautiful, uptown, Oakland, California, and BBC studios is headquartered in beautiful, white city, Oakland.

β€œIf you want to get in touch or have an object for us to consider, email us at 100”

objects at 99PI.org.

Compare and Explore