>> Full trial audio, everything hurting court, no silences to skip.
>> Well, there's now a session for you to see them.
“>> Good morning, you're on a May I proceed.”
>> Yes, please. >> You're on our people at the court today. We have the matter of commonwealth versus Lindsey Clancy. Ms. Clancy is present. She is represented by attorney Kevin Rettington. The commonwealth is represented by assistant district attorney Jennifer Strike
and assistant district attorney Shannon Buckingham. >> Good morning, everyone. Good morning council. >> Good morning, Ms. Clancy. >> Good morning. >> All right.
Before we get going, I just wanted to make one comment without an editorial comment. I just want to remind everybody here and elsewhere. There's been an order. It's been issued in regards to the conducting of this case,
as well as statutes in this Commonwealth,
which relate to jurors, witnesses, attorneys, and others in regards to this proceeding. And everybody should be well aware that those that order and that statute is being enforced and will be enforced.
“So I just kind of want to put that out there”
with no follow-up or editorial comment. And so, council, can I see it side by side? >> All right. Thank you. >> Hey, hey, hey, y'all persons having anything
to do with all the honourable. Please tell me. Just as a spirit you could. I'm sitting at the moment at the end of the Commonwealth. Draw on the end of your sentence and you shall be heard.
But I'd say you don't know if the Massachusetts court is down the session. Please be seated. >> Good morning, Your Honor. >> Yes, please.
>> Your Honor, present people at the court. We have 12 deliberating jurors and six members. Ms. Clancy is present. She is represented by Attorney Kevin Rettington.
The Commonwealth is represented by Assistant District Attorney Shin, Jennifer Spray, and Assistant District Attorney Shin and Buckingham. >> All right. Thank you, Madam Clerk.
Well, morning again to all of you. I know when I just spoke to all of you about two minutes ago. I said I just had one question. I've got two more questions that want to ask them sure you know what they are.
All right.
So the first question is any member of this jury Red Seed heard
over anything from any source about any aspect of this case
“that would affect your ability to be a fair and impartial chair?”
>> All right. >> Last question is there any other serious matter or concern bearing on your service as a juror in this case? Anybody needs to bring to my attention at this time? All right.
Thank you so much for following those instructions as we've gone through this. I'm going to ask you to go and resume your deliberations at this time. All right.
Thank you. >> All right. >> All right. [ Inaudible ] >> Council, I think we need to address it this time.
>> All right. >> All right. So we'll be in recess on this matter at this time. Thank you. [ Inaudible ]
>> Any question? I'm going to give you another instruction. All right. And it's this. Our constitution in laws provide that in a criminal case
the principle way for deciding questions of fact is by the verdict of a jury. In most cases, perhaps strictly speaking in all cases, we're going to implement the question submitted to you with candor and with proper regard and deference and respect.
Selecting in the same manner and from the same source from which any future jury would be. There is no reason to suppose that the case will ever be submitted to 12 persons more intelligent, more impartial, more competent to decide that more or clearer evidence
in more attainable, the law imposes the burden of proof on one party or the other in all cases. In the present case, a criminal case, the burden of proof is on the Commonwealth to establish every element the crime charge beyond reasonable doubt.
If you were left in doubt of any element of the crime, a benefit of the doubt and must be acquitted. However, in conferring together, you ought to pay proper respect to each other's opinions and listen to it. As a reason, if it makes no impression on the minds of others
who are equally honest, equally intelligent, and who have heard the same evidence with the same attention,
The conviction is nobly doubt the correctness of the judgment
that is not concurred in by other members of the Court.
“In case we'll send a copy, I'll free sure into the jury”
or that instruction. May you see it. Thank you, Madam Clerk.
“So at this point, what I'm going to do is, first off, thank you for your time,”
you're commitment to this case.
I'm going to ask you to come back tomorrow morning.
I'm going to call on my instructions.
Thank you. Anything we need to address counsel.
“Alright, so we'll be in recess on this matter till tomorrow morning”
and not a clock. Thank you.
