(upbeat music)
Warner Brothers Discovery has a buyer again. Molly Full Money starts now. (upbeat music) Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money.
(singing in foreign language) ♪ But you can get them to the present be the same ♪ From Full Global Headquarters, this is Botley Full Money. Welcome to Molly Full Money.
I'm Travis Hoyam joined today by Lou Whitman and John Quast and guys, our plans were all thrown out the window last night when we found out that Netflix is apparently not gonna be buying Warner Brothers Discovery. Paramount has swooped in again.
John, what did we learn and is this saga gonna finally be over?
“Are we gonna continue debating this for the next six months?”
Well, yeah, I think the saga is finally over
and I think that Netflix shareholders should breathe a deep sigh of relief. I didn't like this deal from the start for Netflix. And in my view, Netflix's business is humming along just fine.
Why settle itself with a mountain of debt to buy an asset that is inferior to itself? That simply didn't make sense for me. And I think that Netflix shareholders are coming out good here.
Now that Paramount is the winner for the Warner Brothers assets. - Lou, let's go through some of these details. Paramount Skydance is gonna be paying $31 to share for Warner Brothers Discovery. The prior agreement was $27.75 per share
from Netflix. That was cash. The difference between those two numbers is this spin-off of some cable assets that was in unknown value.
But could be more than the Delta there, $3.00 and $3.00 and a quarter. And it could be worth less. So is this actually a better deal for Warner Brothers Discovery?
Is it?
“Because it seems like we're increasing uncertainty”
with does this deal actually close? We'll get to some of the huge weight
that's hanging over this from a regulatory standpoint in a second.
But just from a number standpoint, why does this make sense? - You say that's uncertainty, but there was no certainty that the Netflix deal was gonna close.
So I think that that uncertainty, I think probably arguably Paramount has an easier regulatory hurdle here than Netflix just because they're not as big. - Right, right.
Just because Netflix is a dominant player, there is more of a financing on certainty just because Paramount is such a smaller company. But you do have some guarantees from the Ellison family for that.
So yeah, any M&A has uncertainty, there is certainty in cash. If you kind of make the uncertainty of who closes for what reasons a wash, because they're both questions there,
$31 in cash is $31 in cash that you can do whatever you want with. 2750 and a stub. You can argue what that stub is worth. It could be worth zero.
It could be worth a trillion dollars. It's obviously worth somewhere in the middle. But yeah, $31 in cash is cash. And I do think that that is the end of the day,
that almost always in these deals,
cash is going to get valued higher in terms of a fairness opinion or trying to figure out what's what? - I also want you to thoughts on some of these other details. There's the $31 per share in cash,
but there's what's called reading from the press release here, a daily ticking fee equal to 25 cents per share per quarter beginning September 30th, 2026, as well as a $7 billion regulation, a regulatory termination fee that would be payable
if regulators block the deal. That seems like this deal could get really expensive. And by the way, Paramount Skydance is only about a $12 billion company today. So his Larry, just Larry Ellison just swooped in and said,
hey, I'll write a blank check as long as we get this out of the hands and Netflix. - Yeah, I mean, basically I mean, it's fun to look at the relative size of these companies and certainly Netflix had a lot more they could do
if they wanted to because of their relative size of an inch. In a day if someone is willing to write big checks, that does even the playing field. I think the cleverness of Paramount here is I think some of those sweeteners,
“that's what might have been hard for Netflix to match”
or match in a way that was financially viable for them. I think Netflix shareholders should be happy, that Netflix isn't just going to say all in whatever it takes. I do think though, I trust this management team, I like the Netflix management team.
I do think that they weren't willing
milly here when they just went for this asset.
I do think it's both to, if not in need,
“I think it's both to, our life is getting harder”
with getting content and this is a source of content that we can just pay one price for and have. So I don't, I think this is more than a like to have for Netflix, I think they really did want it, but I don't think they're in trouble if they don't have it.
- John Netflix does now get to go back to being what they were. I agree with you that this was probably a headache that they didn't even really want to take on, but it was better than creating a new competitor with Warner Brothers Discovery and Paramount combining.
But now we are going to potentially have that competitors. I'm going to close likely until late this year, maybe even in the next year. But is a Paramount Skydance Warner Brothers discovery combination going to be a viable competitor
to the Netflix's, the Disney's of the world?
You know, we even still have NBC and Peacock out there. Is this going to be one of the big players and do they have the financial wherewithal to do that? Because it's going to be a complete saddle with that. - That's exactly the question Travis.
“And I think that Netflix is playing a very smart,”
competitive game here if it is playing a game. Listen, yes, it is going to have the assets. It is going to have the content from that perspective. Definitely is going to be one of the major players. But if I have a major competitor in a space,
I want that competitor to have less financial flexibility than I do. That is going to be an advantage for me. And so it's hard for me. I know we're not a cynical podcast,
but it's hard for me not to think that Netflix was playing chess the entire time here. It had basically won this deal and then it lets Warner Brothers go out and get a better bid and it does.
And then it says we're out. Almost like it wanted this to happen.
And the end result here is it gets 2.8 billion
and free money for the breakup. One of its main competitors now has more debt than it can, well, it'll be able to handle it in theory. But it's going to be definitely shackled to this debt for the foreseeable future
and have less financial flexibility than Netflix does. So I say Netflix has won this deal, hands down. - I need to push back just to this idea. I don't think that Netflix risked $80 billion just to try and break up a competitor.
I don't think that that was the goal.
“I think, look, I'm not dismissive of this new entity”
being a competitor, but there's a lot of competitors out there. I don't think Netflix made this move just because they didn't want to see Paramount and Warner Brothers discovery put together. I think they saw it as a way to add content
and they need content. And then again, they didn't need it as bad as Paramount so they walked away as they should. But I think that it, it would make a great script of succession or something like that,
but I don't really believe that's gonna be the next show. - And let's be honest, if I'm a Netflix shareholder and they did just put their balance sheet on the line in hopes that Paramount would be slightly more risk, risk one than them, I need to rethink my admiration
for that management team. I mean, you are really, really throwing the management team under the boss if you think they were playing that game. Just just it from my perspective. - Do you think, do either of you think
that it's gonna be possible in the next, let's say three to five years that we find some deal between Netflix and Paramount Warner Brothers discovery, whatever this entity is gonna be called,
where they go, you know, we're just gonna license of much of this content that we just acquired to Netflix because Netflix can write us the biggest check, John. - Sure, anything is possible.
And there are some assets here that I think that Netflix would have liked to have had its hands on, in particular, the DC Comics International Property. I think that Netflix couldn't do a lot of things like that a lot Disney.
So yeah, there is a possibility that it's willing to license this from the new entity. - The other potential winner here is potentially movie theaters. I think it's probably more likely that we'll see more movies in theaters with this combination
versus with one of those discovery going to Netflix. When we come back, we're gonna get to a flood of earnings news this week. You're listening to Molly Fulman. - Have you ever gazed in Wonder at the Great Paramount?
Have you marveled at the golden face of two-dunkamun? Or admire the delicate features of Queen Nether TT? If you have, you'll probably like the history of Egypt podcast every week, we explore tales of this ancient culture.
The history of Egypt is available wherever you get your podcasting fix.
Come, let me introduce you to the world of ancient Egypt.
- Welcome back to Molly Fulmani.
“We had a lot of earnings come out this week”
and the big one was in video that was obviously the one that drives the market about the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. John, what did we learn from in video and was it as bad as the market's 5% decline
in the stock indicates? - Well, I mean, really the investment community is wondering about future growth more than anything and long-term, right? So it just reported 73% revenue growth
in the most recent quarter. It's expecting an acceleration to 77% in the upcoming quarter that sounds good, John. - More than just good, I mean,
this was a small company we would say this is incredible.
This is a company with over 200 billion and trailing 12 month revenue, it's incomprehensible. Analysts were asking, you know, is it realistic to expect this kind of growth to continue and pointing out on the conference call,
listen, the hyperscaler is spending like 700 billion this year in capital book expenditures, much of that goes to Nvidia for its GPUs. So the question is, how realistic is it
“to expect growth on top of 700 billion in spending already?”
Well, we're getting some news today that open AI just secured the bag for 110 billion in funding, some of that from Nvidia, which is interesting, but open AI isn't raising this money to park it in the bank. It is going to be spending this money on infrastructure, on AI.
So yeah, I think that the capital expenditures can keep rising and Nvidia can keep growing, how much is the question? - Lou, my question here is around whether this was just the marketing certainty around how much of that revenue that John said that hyperscaler is going to be spending
over the next year, somewhere on $650, 700 billion dollars,
we now have sort of a matchup between what the growth of their spending is going to be in 2026 and what Nvidia is expecting to grow in 2026. Now the question, it's almost seems like it's already turning to 2027.
Are those hyperscalers going to spend a trillion and a half dollars? And this is going to be a continued growth story, or have we hit some sort of peak or were near a peak? Because when you look back at the capital spend that spending in the late '90s and early 2000s,
that was actually kind of the warning sign that we were, when you started decelerating, that was when companies like Cisco really, really took it on a chin. I don't want to get too caught up into those analogies,
but that is the real only historical comparison that we can make right now. - Yeah, certainly the market thinks so. It's a fun and interesting. If you look at Nvidia stock, it has had a great,
I mean, it's been a wonderful stock, right up 50%
over the past year, but basically flat in the last six months.
So it has done nothing in the last six months. And I think the exact conversation that investors have in it, there's nothing wrong with this business, but how much higher can it go? I think some of that, I mean, look,
meta in some of these companies using off-balance sheet, kind of it feels like we're getting to the point where we just can't go higher. Nvidia pushback at this though, so. But yes, 50% of data center revenue came from
the top five hyperscaler. So there is market concentration, but they talked a lot in this quarter about the diversity of demand coming from model builders, enterprises, sovereign customers are a big part of this.
So there could be other levers to pull here,
“but I think that's what the market is debating here.”
There is no question about the strength of Nvidia's business, all of the metrics are off the charts. I don't think they are relative to what they're doing now unreasonably valued, but how much more can we squeeze this as far as upside?
That is the debate, and I think it's a fair question. I think there could be an answer. I don't think it's set and stone, but I do think that yeah, there is just no way that the growth we have seen could continue indefinitely.
Even these cash producing hyperscalers, just don't have the cash to keep jumping the way they have. John, the other news that we've gotten in the past week is companies like AMD selling a whole bunch of chips to meta, you have Google, a lot of rumors about what
are they going to be doing with TPUs? Are they going to be trying to sell those to other companies maybe even form joint ventures? Is that another sort of headwind where you go, hey, 80 months ago, there was no competition,
and now there's at least some competition in the market. That could squeeze not only revenue, but margins eventually. I don't know if I call it a headwind yet. It is definitely a question, because, for example, you bring up the TPUs, that's not exactly new technology.
We've been waiting for that to kind of scale and really put any sort of measurable dent in Nvidia's business for a while now.
I think that if you're looking at it, though,
from an investment perspective within video,
you're looking at those profit margins. They're historically high.
“They're really incredibly high for a hardware.”
I know it has software, but we're selling a lot of hardware here. Those margins over 50% for a hardware business. That is really quite good. The question is, in the reason it's so high is because of supply and demand.
The demand is outpacing the supply. Can these other products come online meet some of that demand and finally bring it into more balance and then Nvidia's margins will compress to still good, but not what they are right now?
That's the question on everyone's mind. - It's definitely still a buyer's market. I mean, competition exists, but I don't anticipate Nvidia having any issues clearing out inventory.
And again, just the strength of this business. I'm gonna steal this from our colleague Tim buyers, but I thought he's brilliant, and I think this is such a neat stat. From year of year,
fourth quarter, fourth quarter,
Nvidia spent two billion more in R&D sales
admin expenses. That produced $28.8 billion in additional revenue. So about for every $1 new operating expense, $13 and 68 in additional sales, that's the way you run a railroad.
- Yeah. - And again, just for all of the oh no would can't go up forever, please, please appreciate what they have. And status quo seems pretty okay right now. - On the other end of the spectrum,
we have a company like the trade desk, John, this stock is down 83% from its highs.
“What did we learn this week and are they in trouble?”
- I think that we didn't learn in a whole lot. We learned that growth continues to slow down more than what we're accustomed to seeing, more than what we ever have seen with the trade desk. That's a question and what's really interesting about this
is the company is a digital advertising company, right? And it launched its AI platform Cokai 10 quarters ago. Okay, and this was supposed to be the big thing. Seven out of the 10 quarters since launch, revenue growth has decelerated.
Now, grain is pointing out, Jeff Greene, the CEO is pointing out that 100% of customers are now using this supposedly better version of the platform, but there have been some reports from customers
that it's too complicated and that might be contributing to the deceleration that they might not like it as much as they were expected to like it. And I think that Greene himself confirmed this on the fourth quarter call.
He said the complexity of our ecosystem is a mode for the trade desk, but that doesn't mean we have
“to hand the complexity back to our user.”
To me, this is him saying we have in fact great handed the complexity back to our users. And that shouldn't be what's happening. This should be simpler for them. It should be simpler to use.
And if it was, maybe they would not be decelerating as much as they are. - Lou, we also heard from Snowflake, what did we learn in the quarter?
- Decent quarter, but here's what I want,
this I find so fascinating, 'cause the narrative has been about how AI is gonna eat everybody's launch, right? That everybody is doomed because of AI. And Snowflake definitely falls into the category
of companies that are supposedly doomed. So, contrast that with their cash from operations and free cash flow. They had a $345 million free cash flow. Where did that come from, deferred revenue?
Deferred revenue is revenue that customers are paying for future performance or future obligations. But it doesn't, because it's in the future, it's not hitting the PNL shave right now. So, in one hand, you have the world, Snowflake is doomed
because of AI. And in another hand, what's actually happening is, customers are putting down hundreds of millions of dollars in cash to use Snowflake products in the future. I feel like the market should at least meditate
on that a bit and think about what that might say for Snowflake's prospects. - When we come back, we're gonna talk about potential other buyouts that would be interesting in 2022, if you're listening, they might be cool.
♪ I'm in the call and through the power of it sounds ♪ ♪ Now war is declared ♪ ♪ I battle, come down ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and to the unknown ♪ ♪ Come out of the cover ♪
♪ Your boys and girl ♪ ♪ I'm in the calling ♪ ♪ I don't look to us ♪ ♪ For me, be the main year ♪ ♪ There's been the dust ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
“♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪”
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
“♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪”
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
“♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪”
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪ ♪ I'm in the call and see we ain't got money ♪
♪ I feel like you'd be paying maybe a billion dollars ♪
“♪ I think it's the valuation I've seen for Substack ♪”
♪ So not an insignificant amount ♪ ♪ And then see a lot of your best assets ♪ ♪ Maybe I don't know you'd have to figure out a way to make sure they don't walk out the door ♪ John? I agree with Lou here.
I do think directionally this is a very interesting idea. Substack is does seem to be kind of the future of reporting in these good journalists who are on the platform, this independence that they have. But the New York Times would have to change who the New York Times is to make this a good deal. I think that it would be skating to where the puck is,
but you'd have to leave something of yourself along the way. And I'm not sure the New York Times is willing to do that. Yeah. One other idea? Yeah.
“I think you had to, like, talk to Kosk and make an enterprise about this.”
But if I was in the air times, I'd be much more interested in, you know, I think trying to get axios for probably half the price. I think that fits the brand much better. Yeah. The combination of different business models would probably be a challenge for the New York Times and Substack.
But I don't know. You're right, John, that the a lot of the breaking news is now not necessarily coming from the big media outlets anymore. It's coming from these smaller producers. One of my hobby horses recently, as I look over at my peloton bike that is collecting dust. And my Garmin watch is that these two companies make a lot of sense together.
Garmin is a much, much bigger company. It is a profitable company. Peloton is struggling. I think they need to find a buyer. They're just, they're losing some subscribers.
And there's a lot of, Garmin is trying to move into that subscription business. And I, one of the reasons I'm not doing it is because I'm already paying for peloton.
“So is there something there, John, where they can pull these two businesses together?”
Kind of match up the common user base and maybe make a bigger business than the sum of its parts. In a different timeline, peloton would be the larger, more successful company compared to Garmin. And Garmin would make sense as a bolt on to peloton's business. I'm not sure how much it makes sense to bolt on peloton to Garmin's business. If Garmin is the one in the driver seat.
However, I do see the integration capability between the two. You're wearing a garment that is monitoring so much of your own health. And then you're jumping on some peloton equipment that is also integrating with that. That makes sense. But I'm not sure how much Garmin wants this, although the two businesses do have things in common.
So my grand theory on these exercise abs is that they all advertise with people that look a lot buffer than I am. You know, there's something to dream that if you just sign up with this or if you buy this equipment, if you do whatever, you will look like the model. And then inevitably we know what happens.
That's not what happens. And so these things tend to be fats, which is a way to say that I would never buy one of these subscription businesses on the way down.
I agree with you Travis. I think a deal in theory can make sense. And, you know, Garmin, I think would like to go in the subscription. But, you know, you're still going to pay a billion plus I'm probably what two billion I think were peloton is. And less they can, you know, I think that why would you pay for these these following knives tend not to bounce back. All right. Well, hopefully my peloton bike is still usable for the next few years, but maybe maybe I'm maybe I'm on the wrong side of this. Lou, you brought up this one before we started recording this segment. And I kind of like it.
Make the case for Berkshire buying PayPal. It just feels like a Berkshire business. I mean, my criticism with PayPal is it's a mature financial services company. Where are they going to grow? But they have a massive cash flow generation ability. They're buying back their shares and impressive pace. They're doing the things that mature companies do. Their problem is is that they're still sort of viewed through the Fintech prism.
I mean, there's been a lot of talk about PayPal who might buy them.
I think a lot of that is, let's opportunistic potential buyers and not really a desire to sell.
“They have a new CEO coming in. I think they'd rather give the CEO some time.”
But, Berkshire, with their massive amount of cash to buy this company, take it out of the quarter to quarter spotlight of what growth is. And just use that cash generation ability to kind of invest in the business and invest elsewhere. It just feels like a Berkshire type of asset. And it would be very much Berkshire to invest in a financial services business.
Once it's passed the bleeding edge and when it's more just predictable and we get this now. I agree with everything that Lou just said from a financials perspective. I think from a valuation perspective, it makes sense for Berkshire as well. The one thing that I would say is up for debate here is whether PayPal has a durable competitive advantage. And I think that Berkshire would be interested in does this business have something going for it five years from now.
10 years from now that we can be certain about. I think there's an argument that you can make for both sides of that. And I wonder where Berkshire would fall down as far as PayPal's competitive advantage. You know what would help with that competitive advantage is if PayPal was the one operating payments for dairy queen and. Guy co and all of these other businesses that Berkshire on so that could definitely be a help.
Let's end on this one. Door dash and lift John this was your idea. Make the case for it. Yeah, if I'm CEO of Door dash, I would acquire lift. Right now and figure out what I'm doing with it later.
I would let it operate. You're saying the price is too good.
“Exactly. I mean, what is it trading for five times as cash flow or something like that?”
I would I would acquire it allow it to operate independently. And if I let it operate independently, I think this works out well for me. If I figure out ways in the future to integrate it into one kind of roll up platform better go toe to toe with Uber. Maybe I do that. I think you can buy it now and figure it out later.
I love this. I think it's a great idea.
I don't think there's any chance for it happening because Door dash said we're going to spend a couple hundred million.
Oh, and you know, and Bill Aaron for structure and the stock I've got punished. So I don't know. I don't think the market would like it. But maybe because it is a real, you know, it's not just I promise you we're going to we're going to spend and what's going to work out. It's going to be a real asset.
But lift is a very, very good second fiddle in its industry. And there's a lot of ways that a smart management team, I think you're combined this to dash as platform. I, I don't think it's going to happen, but I love this idea. There are also partners.
“And this is kind of the non Uber ecosystem.”
I think this makes a ton of sense. The other one that I would throw in there too, that has been kind of rumored to be looking at a company like lift. And that's, you know, this is an Amazon company, but what if one of these autonomous vehicle units gets spun out. Maybe acquired by like a door dash of the world. They can have custom made vehicles.
I don't know. There's just, there's a lot of opportunity here.
Door dash has a nearly eighty billion dollar market cap.
They have the money to play with. I love this as well. Maybe we'll be talking about this deal. Some point in the future. So Tommy Zoo, call your banker, John only wants a 5% finder's fee.
Otherwise, the deal should come together clear. All right, when we come back, we're going to get to Stacks Center radar. You're listening to Motley Full Money. The devil went down the Georgia. He was looking for a soul, the steel.
He was in a bag because he was way behind. He was with it to make a deal. When he came across this young man, so on on the field and playing in hot. And the devil jumped up on a hickest dump, and said, "Boy, let me tell you why." I guess you didn't know it, but I am a filth player too.
If you care to take it there, I'll make a bet with you." Thank you. Simon, are you sure about the steel? Even the soul splashes. And then they hear that.
No, I'm not sure. So steel is my safe space. Do you know what it means? Yes, exactly. So steel is like a steel.
They only understand. A gallop studio, a job or a car. I'm sure. I don't feel like steel. I'm not sure.
I'm not sure. With viso steia.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the
monthly full may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the monthly full's editorial standards, and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for information purposes only. To see our full advertisement disclosure, please check out our show notes. This week was that Joe B.
Is moving closer to actually flying their EV toll aircraft?
One of the first places they're going to do that is in Dubai and you're going...
Is this a big deal or not?
I mean, it's somewhere between. But what part of this is new? We knew about the partnership. We knew. We saw what the app is going to look like.
And it's kind of cool to have a little helicopter icon there to be able to pop into. You know what I mean, it's just short, but I mean, we knew this was coming. We knew Joe B was going to launch in 2026. We knew it was going to be Dubai. Look, it's not insignificant, but right now the arms, the press release arms race is going strong.
Joe B's are tribal archer. They just announced a deal with Starlink today. It looks like everybody's trying to get their friends together. Once we're actually in the air, we can judge the economics. We can judge the stocks.
I mean, look, this is great for Uber. It's great optionality, but just like Waymo right now is just a teeny tiny part of the business with potential. Joe B, it's going to be even a smaller part of the business. These are some stuff for investors to monitor, to be aware of, to hope for the future. But this is not actionable right now.
This is all just kind of, you know, oh, neat. The archer announcement.
“I think it was interesting because yeah, Starlink on board.”
These are not going to be very long flights. If you can't get away from your device and you're being connected for 15 minutes. Well, here on an eVTOL aircraft. I mean, look out the window for, well, the seconds that that was just sort of a strange announcement. But maybe we need to be connected to 24/7.
Hey, it's all about who has the best friends. All right. Let's get to stocks on our radar. John, you're up first. What are you looking at this week?
Listen, I'm tired of loop beating me week after week. So I'm going with a stock that I think that even he would vote for over his own pick this week. So I'm going with Mercado Libre. This is symbol M-E-L-I. This is a business that many of our listeners probably don't know firsthand unless they're in Latin America.
The company has operations in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, etc. It has an e-commerce marketplace, fintech logistics, advertising lending. It does a ton. Here's the thing. The stock is down over 30% from its high and it doesn't have anything to do with business execution.
In fact, 25 was the company's seventh straight year of 30% growth or better. The stock is down because investors are worried about execution risk from here. It expanded free shipping, that compressed margins, it increased lending. And so now it's setting aside more money and reserves. Investors seem to fear that the business will suddenly make a major misstep after years of flawless execution.
On one hand, I get it. There is a new CEO. So maybe a little bit more execution risk.
“But I think investors are being overly fearful here.”
The valuation is the cheapest. It's been since the great recession. That's too good to pass up. Dan, what do you want to know of Mercado Libre? John, how are you going to say that our listeners aren't familiar with Mercado Libre? We did a whole segment on them yesterday on this very show.
I meant as a consumer, Dan. That's fair, I suppose.
John, do you have first-hand use of Mercado Libre?
I do not. I lived in Paraguay and it didn't have a big presence there. Lou, what's on your radar this week? All right, so John's right. I do love Mercado Libre, but I also love Rocket Lab. Dan, I'm going to talk to you about Rocket Lab, ticker, RKLB. They released earnings this week.
It was a beat on revenue in Ibita, but really investors didn't care. That's not what we're focused on here. The lab pushed the timing of this first neutron launch into the fourth quarter of this year. They had previously been targeting the first half of the year. Before that, they promised last year.
We knew a delay was coming. They warned of a tank rupture when they were testing it. But the timeline is probably a little longer than investors had hoped.
“This is important because the neutron rocket will increase the size of payloads.”
A rocket lab can launch in the space and turn create a lot more opportunities for the company. Here's the good news. Rocket Lab ended a quarter with a backlog of 1.4 billion with a B in future space system business. Nearly 500 million in launch contracts. Company continues to acquire components, kind of making sure the supply chain is good.
They still have over $800 million in cash on hand. As for the neutron, I'm still optimistic. I don't think long-term investors are going to care if it gets off. You know, five years now we're not going to care if it was this quarter or that quarter. They just need to get it airborne.
But until this happens, neutron will be an overhang and it could create buying opportunities. So I'm watching it close to Dan. What do you think about rockets?
I just want to point out to all these rocket investors and everything is that we're never going to be on Mars gang.
It doesn't have a magnetosphere. We cannot live there. No, we're going to the moon now. Yeah. No, you are 100% right.
Alright, Dan, which one is going on here? We're going to go, I don't know, I kind of like both companies to be on us. So we're going to go McCraterly because, you know, we talked about it yesterday. Thank you to John and Lou for joining me in Dan Boyd or the work behind the glass.
I'm Travis Hoyam.
Thanks for listening to Motley Full Money. We'll see you here tomorrow.



