50 Shades of Legal Gray

Welcome to Pot's Av America. I'm Alex Wagner. I know some of you may be tuning in

“today expecting our conversation with the Michigan Senate candidates on the”

Democratic side. Well, unfortunately you're gonna have to wait just a little bit longer. We had to reschedule that conversation to accommodate for an unexpected change in candidate schedules, but do not worry. We are setting a new date and we will have more on that very very soon. So stand by. Today, instead, I wanted to focus on the avalanche of corruption. Some folks might just call it theft coming out

of the White House. The $1.8 billion slush fund to pay off January 6th

rioters, the announcement that the president and his family are now immune from IRS investigations, the ballroom slash bunkers slash money pit, the reflecting pool, the president's 3000 plus stock trades, while in office, the self-enrichment, the cronies and the taxpayer abuse, all of it has hit new heights or should I say new lows. And I wanted to talk to someone who could help me make sense of all of

this, but also about what Democrats in Congress and lawyers outside of it can do to fight back. Joining me for that conversation is the incredible Norma Eisen, founder of the democracy defenders fund and former special counsel to the president for ethics and government reform in the Obama administration. There is truly no better expert in America on White House corruption than Norm Eisen. We are going to get to that

conversation in just a moment. But before we do, I want to remind you that CricketCon 2026 tickets are on sale now. Come hang with us, November 5th through 7th in Washington DC for live shows and panels and meetups and more. I will be

“there and you should be there too. Get tickets at crookedcon.com and if you like”

what you hear today, please do check out my show also on Cricket called Runaway Country where every week I talk to people at the center of the headlines. We just published, I think, a pretty awesome if disconcerting episode where I talked to one of the police officers who is at the Capitol on January 6th about his reaction to the news that he will be funding payments to the people who beat

him unconscious that day and gave him traumatic brain injury. Check it out. Okay, here is Norm Eisen. Norm, thank you for doing this. I have so many questions. I think everybody has questions, but I have like many, many, many, many questions for someone who really knows what the hell is up with all of this or has a sense of the law, at least. Let's just start at the beginning. On Monday, the DOJ

announced that it made a settlement agreement on Trump's 10 billion dollar lawsuit

against the IRS, which he filed over the 2020 leak of his tax returns to the New York Times in Pro-Publica. As part of that settlement, the DOJ announced they would establish a 1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund to compensate individuals who claim they were victims of government weaponization during the Biden

“administration. Norm, was you the reaction the same as mine, namely what the fuck?”

Yes, Alex, it might have even earned a what the double fuck technical legal term. You know, when I was the White House ethics, I would not even allow Barack Obama to refinance his modest family home in Chicago because it was the great recession and he was regulating the banks, the thought that the President of the United States can

innocent sue himself and throw that case out, a set up by 1.8 billion dollar slush fund.

It's an endowment for January 6th insurrectionist, including those who attacked the police and were convicted by juries. It's just inconceivable. We filed an immediate legal objection on behalf of 93 members of Congress the very first and there's been a tsunami of other opposition that has developed since and like the Epstein files, this is one that is not going away because also like that scandal, it's such an outrageous corruption situation.

corrupted is with that paper trail exists within Trump's own administration. I was stunned by the

“reporting we got this week that IRS lawyers compiled a 25-page memo that was supposed to be sent”

to the Justice Department saying, hey guys listen, Trump's lawsuit isn't going to stand up and court. This is literally treasury department lawyers saying, this whole thing is bogus and yet that notwithstanding, first of all, it's unclear if the DOJ ever read the memo, they felt the need to set make a settlement agreement with Trump nonetheless. I mean, there seems to be like, I mean, I have questions, don't you have questions about this? I do and you know who else has

questions, it appears the top lawyer at the Treasury Department who quit in proximity to the

establishment of this outrageous slush fund taking $1.8 billion out of your and my and the American

“people's pockets in order to pay off Trump's cronies. The legal flaws were in the filing that we”

made with the court on behalf of those 93 members of the minority in the House of Representatives. There's no constitutional authority to do this, including because it creates an ammanuments issue. There's no statutory authority. It's contrary to the rules governing the judgment fund, which is the pot of money that is going to be rated for this. I mean, the illegalities are vast and it's so bad that reportedly dozens of members of the president's own party confronted Todd Blanche, the acting

attorney general Donald Trump's former defense lawyer and he's still behaving that way, confronted him and they had to shalex and to shelve the reconciliation negotiations. It blew up the reconciliation

“package because it's these senators who are normally lap dogs, even they can't take it. So it's”

the worst corruption scandal in the history of the presidency. Yeah, let's okay. So let that is the breaking news of today. We're hoarding this on Thursday. So Republicans were all set. They were all teed up to pass a reconciliation bill before the imposed June 1st deadline set by Donald Trump and that

was going to give ICE up to $72 billion in funding, which was a tidy sum for a paramilitary organization

that slaughtered American citizens, but I digress. That's neither here nor there in terms of this conversation. But as part of that reconciliation negotiation, senators and Republicans senators apparently wanted to put some guardrails on the slush fund. According to the New York Times, Republicans were exploring adding a measure to the immigration bill. That's the ICE bill. To limit the slush fund, I'm the slush fund. That's my terminology, not the New York Times.

In part, normed because leaders were worried that if they didn't, a democratic effort to kill

the slush fund could draw enough Republican support to succeed. First of all, walk me through this.

I mean, how, how were these two things related? Like you're talking about on one hand, reconciliation, funding that would have given money to DHS to ICE. But then you're also talking about a fund, a pot of money that exists at the DOJ that's already been allocated. Is that right? I mean, how do they, how can they use one to tackle the other? I guess is what I'm asking. Reconciliation is a budgeting process that Congress uses that under the rules of the Senate,

it's called the the bird rule. Under the rules of the Senate is not subject to the usual procedures for purely budgetary matters. You don't have to get 60 votes in order to move the bill. You can do it on a peer majority. But Alex, once you have that majority, you can put anything into that reconciliation package relating to how the federal government spends its money. And you do it out of simple majority. So that means if only a handful of Republican senators and members in the

house were willing to agree, hey, we should not be creating a slush fund to compensate violent

himself a 34 times convicted felon pardon them and day one in what was previously the

“greatest scandal in the history of the presidency. We should not be paying them out of a fund of $1.8 billion.”

That proposition might have garnered enough votes that this reconciliation bill would have been used to limit or shut down the slush fund. So leadership freaked out. Everybody go, um, funding ice

is on hold and now we're going to see what happens and whether finally, finally, like with the

Epstein files, but unfortunately unlike had grids of other outrageous where the president's party has caved, finally we're going to see if there's another example where there were a few of them are willing to stand up to him. Well, yeah, and we can talk about the new reality as of this week where

“Trump is just saying off with their heads to any of his Republicans in critics in the Senate”

and effectively creating an anti-Trump coalition inside his own party. But just let's table that for a second because to your point about the reconciliation bill and the way in which this is such a fuck-ocked-up piece of political strategy, here's Burgess Everett from Politico reporting. Senator Kevin Cramer says it would have been a good idea for the Trump administration to announce the

$1.8 billion fund after the reconciliation bill passed. Instead, it exposed the bill to all kinds of

amendments because of its judiciary title. We can't help the president with a bucket budget reconciliation

“package with this hanging over us. Okay, can you unpack that for me? Like, I just did the White House”

shoot itself in its own foot on this, and obviously not in consultation with Senate Republicans. The incompetence of this White House knows no bounds. We see that I had to fill my car gas with gas today, and you see that every work and sees that when they go to the gas station or they drive by one. So if they had just waited until this budget package were done, you wouldn't be able to peel off Republicans to attach a provision to shut down or leave a ball. So it's where would we be as a democracy

if Donald Trump or not? I mean, does Alex fortunately, he's not very good. We had. I mean, it's no way he is good. I'm going to give him a little credit because he just, I feel like I'm living in a tyrannical moment, but in terms of the practical execution of tyrannical endeavors, he's not very good. Not only does he announce this slush fund before the reconciliation bill is passed, which throws the whole thing into doubt. He does at the same moment he's alienating

members of his own party who he needs marching in lockstep to get this thing over the hump. I mean, it's just him. It's like it's pure own goal after own goal from this administration. Yeah. And we've seen a lot of that at Democracy Defenders Fund and Democracy Defenders action, the organizations I co-founded where we have over 300 legal cases and matters. Again, and again, Donald Trump has tried to break the law in the stupidest way possible and has been

slapped down by the courts for doing it. But you also see it in his handling of the other main job

of a president, foreign policy and international relations. There has never been a bigger fiasco

in the history of American warmaking and we've had some fiasco's Vietnam Iraq. We've never had a bigger one than Iran. You want to talk about it on goals. He handed the straight-of-formals over to Iran. So this, but the slush fund like the Epstein files, this really and like the war, it's breaking through and day after day that country is saying what? And you know, you are getting this pushback from Republicans and Congress will see if that holds up when it's time for a vote.

January six insurrectionist and others is. Can I ask a word about the money itself? Like we keep talking about slush fund. It's already been allocated. The Senate may try and put some guard rails on it

post-facto, but the reality is this money already exists somewhere at the DOJ. Can you explain

I mean for people who don't understand how and where this money is pooled? Can you shed some light on that? There's a fund at the Department of Justice called the Judgment Fund. And typically it is used to pay judgments. You don't have to go back to Congress every time the United States government

“loses a case if you have to pay somebody or you have a legitimate settlement of a case not a case”

where the president is suing himself. You use the Judgment Fund. But Alex, like all money spent by the United States, it is subject to congressional guard rails. Congress establishes the rules on how money can be spent. And because here there never was a real case to be settled. The people who are benefiting from this were not a part of that phony tax case that was about to be perhaps thrown out in Florida. There's none of the triggers that under article one of the Constitution

Congress passes the laws to govern the utilization of money including the Judgment Fund. Now the of those triggers are implicated here. This would be an illegal disbursement of money. Anybody who took the money would be at risk of having it clawed back. It's a gigantic cash grab. It's as if the president wrote in his limo to the Treasury Department to begs of cash. And then went to a picnic of the insurrectionist and through the money in the air. It's totally

illegal in every way. So the people who participated in January 6, including violently assaulting cops should not be too excited about the cash that they're bound to collect.

“This episode is sponsored by Better Help. Life is a lot sometimes. Regardless of what”

to keep in your up at night or leaving you overwhelmed, it's easy to feel like you have to figure it out all on your own. You don't have to face these challenges alone. Having someone to listen to understand the support you can make all the difference. That's where Better Help comes in. Better Help Therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the US. Better Help does the initial matching work for you so you could focus on your therapy goals.

A short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences and their 12 plus years of experience. An industry-leading match, fulfillment rate mean they typically get it right the first time. If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from their tailored wrecks. With over 30,000 therapists, Better Help is the world's largest online therapy platform

having served over 6 million people globally and it works with an average rating of 4.9 out of

five for a live session based on 1.7 million client reviews. It's a scary world out there. There's a lot of things happening. There's politics. There's, you know, all this AI, doomer stuff. People think that they can just deal with it by talking to a spouse or a friend or someone else. My message to them is you can't because that person is tuning you out. You need someone who is paid to listen to you.

“That's why you need your therapist and you'll be able to benefit from it. You don't have to”

traverse life challenges alone. Find the personal support you're looking for in therapy. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com/psa. That's better hp.com/psa. It's a american brought you by hiya. We're only beginning to understand the impact of ultra process foods on our health and especially on the health of our kids. That's exactly why hiya exists to give parents a real solution in a market flooded with kids vitamins that prioritize

candy like appeal over actual nutrition. Some children's vitamins on the market today contain up to 7 grams of sugar per serving and are stuck with artificial auditives and petroleum based eyes. Hiya took the opposite approach 0 sugar 0 gummy added. It's just clean nutrition. Worked alongside pediatricians and nutrition scientists. Hiya created a powerful chewable vitamin.

The packs of blend of 12 organic fruits and vegetables plus 15 essential vitamins and minerals

into every dose. The ingredient list is clean non-GMO vegan dairy-free allergy-free gelatin-free nut-free. They thought of everything. Design for kids tune up. Hiya, ship straight to your door. You get this awesome reusable bottle with your first order and then they send refills every month. One less thing to remember at this store. Tommy is children.

over the other day and he was just talking me through girdles and completeness theorems. Oh, the completeness. So what's interesting about the completeness theorem is it proves that you actually can't that there must be some part of a mathematical structure that is not provable. There must be some part of it that can't be provided by the proof.

“There has to be some assumption baked into it and that's not solvable. Can we solve?”

Yeah. Charlie explained it better. That's right. That may be wrong too. I think that's right. Deepers, they don't have a proof of mathematics itself as fundamental limits.

Yeah. There will always be true statements that cannot be proven.

Yeah. I got it. I know that. I know that. I believe there was, this is somehow contingentially connected to some, there was a two guys that wrote like a 500 page proof to just show that one plus one equal two. Really. Yeah. Things get pretty crazy and they're like 1920s in math. Anyway. Oh, I'm the reading me out. In here is something every parent needs to hear. The getting your kids eat vegetables feels like an impossible daily battle.

High as new kids daily greens plus super food is a total game changer. It's a greens powder designed specifically for kids. That's packed with 55 plus whole foods or some ingredients just mix one scoop with milk or milk alternative and watch them actually enjoy something that's secretly feeling they're growing bodies. We've worked out a special

deal with hiya for their best selling children's vitamin received 50% up your first order to claim

“this deal. You must go to hiyahelp.com/crooked. This deal is not available on their regular”

website. So go to h-i-y-a-l-t-h.com/crooked and get your kids the full body nourishment they need to grow into healthy adults. Can I ask, I mean, there's already, you know, blanch acting attorney general Todd Blanch who's, I don't know, conducting the most pathetic stunningly pathetic job audition job interview ever just doing literally anything breaking all laws and norms to get the title permanently. But nonetheless acting attorney

general Todd Blanch has been very opaque about weather and when the American public might find out who is a potential recipient of these funds. Here's my question because they are public funds and because they are subject to some oversight. You know, the DOJ says, we wash our hands of this money. It's like we have nothing to do with it. Once it's given out don't come knocking on our door. But that's not the end of this, right? The American, there can be FOIA requests

to find out where this money went. I mean, there is, there are mechanisms by which whether the administration wants the public to or not, the public can find out how this money's been spent. Is that correct? To be sure, the government is still subject to congressional oversight, members of Congress can demand that information should Congress change hands, come January, the House and perhaps the Senate will have enforceable subpoena power to pursue

those information that information. But Alex, you and I also have the power to do it. Any journalist and any American through the Freedom of Information Act can file a request for this. We have filed hundreds of Freedom of Information requests over the years, including a large number at the Democracy Defenders Fund and Democracy Defenders Action. And then if we don't get the information, we want, we go to court and the court forces the disclosure. So they should not think

that at the Department of Justice that they're going to be able to hide this. But more to the

“point, I believe litigation has already begun and there's going to be a very substantial”

court pushback on the first dollar ever going out the door at the fund because it's so blatantly

illegal. Yes, going to a J6 picnic and throwing a bunch of cash up into the air doesn't seem like what the founding fathers intended. Let's talk about those lawsuits because you're a part of your organization, Democracy Defenders filed a motion to block this use of taxpayer funds. And it was filed in the coalition on the suit, includes, as you mentioned, members of Congress, including Congressman Jonah Goose and ranking member Jamie Raskin. Can you talk a little bit about your

confidence that that can move forward? And then I also want to get your thoughts on other suits and who has standing here? Yeah, and we filed the initial legal objection within moments, literally within minutes. We had that ready to go on behalf of those members of Congress. We've got

an all-nighter to get this together. The judge in Florida who had the power to investigate and

perhaps the blocket did not exercise that power. That means that we and others now will go to court. We're going to need to find new places to do that. Those lawsuits have started to pop. Anybody who has an injury as a result of this miss begotten slush fund has the power to bring that case. People who are entitled to reparation for genuine abuses of the government. There have been so many over the past 16 months who have been targeted by the administration. There's a real

victims of weaponization. Alex is dubious. You can tell from the context. That's not who's going to be getting money. And then others who are injured in various ways by the funds, including people and might have gotten under properly, concretely authorized disbursements from the judgment fund.

That 1.8 billion has to come from somewhere. There's people who would have been able to recover

that money has gone. So there's a huge number of folks who are injured in various ways by this. And the litigation is going to be going on. I predict for months and years to come. And if you liked our first brief on behalf of those 93 members of Congress where we laid out all the legalities here, stay tuned. Much more ahead from us at Democracy Defenders Action. What do you think about human human. There's an excess of lawsuits that are either being filed

or better coming down the pike to officers who famously and publicly defended the capital in January 6. Daniel Hodges and Harry Dunn sued the administration this week to try and stop the creation

“of the slush fund. What do you think of that effort? And where does it go? I think it's great effort.”

Hats off to Harry and to Daniel. I know them both. They're wonderful public servants for taking the leap. The Public Integrity Project and my friend Brendan Ballou who brought that case was pulling no punches. So I think you're going to see that case unfold together with other litigation that is coming down the pike for all the different individuals or groups of individuals who've been injured by this terrible case. So I'm optimistic that the litigation

front is going to result in putting some limits and even an injunction stopping the implementation of

“the fund toward together with Congress, right? I think they're also going to impose some limits.”

And that one, too, punch of the court of law and the public opinion, if you will, the public outrage has reflected in the even the Republican members anger about this. Well, you know, they've you won't lose money by betting, betting against their willingness to take on the president. But here you have all of the cylinders of the scandal clicking. And it does remind me of the

Epstein files where it became more and more intense. And finally, the president's own party

broke with him. There seemed to be, according to Press Report, somewhat of a mutiny today, when the president's former defense lawyer Todd Blanch tried to sell this to the Republicans in the Senate. Yeah, I mean, and by the way, Thomas Massey, who led the charge on Epstein, still in Congress, John Coranan, who Trump basically sent, you know, to put on top of a door in the floor, he's still in the Senate. You know, these people who Trump is alienated are very much

“still there, still angry. And I think ready to go out, you'll somebody stand style, guns of blazing.”

I want to ask, you know, your level about your level of alarm on the on the why. So we, we know that

come up in. But I, you know, I wonder what it signals that he, I mean, how worried are you about the

midterms that right now, as the polling shows Trump and Republicans on track to lose one or both houses of Congress. The strategy is not to pivot towards a better message, but to throw cash at a group of people who have proven themselves violent and willing to do anything to upend an election in Trump's favor. Like, does it make you worried about the levers Trump might pull

“as the sort of weather forecast gets worse and worse for him in the party ahead of November?”

I think that the kind of machinations that we've seen and we've been litigating already

are a sign that Donald Trump affirms the will of the people.

But based on the track record, I think voters can be confident that there will be free and fair voting no matter what he tries. Look, Alex, at Democracy Defender's Fund and Action, we litigated against Donald Trump's election take over executive order. He issued one last year. We went to court. We got a preliminary injunction. Then he pivoted to try to steal five seats through redistricting in Texas. We represented those Texas legislatures who

“fled the state to sound the alarm on redistricting. The result was there was five seats added in”

California to cancel out Texas. We went to court. We defended. We won that prop 50. We helped

defend it in court. We won it. We won again at the Supreme Court. The trial judgment was untouched on an emergency Supreme Court opinion without a single disson noted dissenting vote. Donald Trump has tried another election's take over. We're in court on that. He's trying to do more redistricting in the South in Florida more seats being stolen. We're in court on that. We've been winning these cases now since January 20th, 2025 plus a lot of others in our over 300 cases.

So voters should know, it's not just us. We're part of a very big coalition. Voter should know that we are going to go to court. We are going to fight for them and we are going to make sure no matter what Donald Trump and his counties try that voting is a safe free in fair. And to your point before, it's a system wide. It's an attack on the separation of powers. It's an executive branch attack on the legislative branch and potentially the judicial branch. And those

two branches are potentially not going down without a fight, right? They're the lawsuits. And then there's also Congress saying, uh-uh, like this is actually, I mean, at least Democrats and perhaps Republicans join them. This is our purview. We are granted the authority. We are granted the power of the purse. And you can't take that away from us because, by the way, what is the appropriations process matter if a president can just come up with a fake lawsuit and then a fake settlement

and give himself, you know, control effectively over billions of dollars, like why bother having Congress, if that's going to be the new strategy. Republicans in Congress have been disappointing. That's article one, article two, the president has been outrageous, but dank heavens for our federal trial court judges and the article three, because they have been the guardrail, but those cases don't start themselves. You need groups like ours and our wonderful

coalition partners, hundreds of clients and partners who go to court, who bring those cases. And that makes it possible to have these, uh, these many, many victories that have hemmed Donald Trump in. And the other good thing about that is each one of those court cases is an

“alarm bell and the American people have woken up. They see what's going on. And that's why the”

president has these historically low approval ratings. So he's not coming from a place of strength coming from a place of weakness, of course, that can be very dangerous. And that's why we are

elections and more broadly. I got to ask you about one last part of the slush fund this settlement agreement,

“which is the provision that the DOJ added on Tuesday, that the IRS is forever barred and”

precluded from investigating Trump and his family on their taxes, making the first family effectively

immune from audits from the IRS. Okay, Norm. I mean, double what the fuck on this, too. But like, is this leap? It might be a trip. But like, it's, can you do this? You can't, you can't, you know. No, first of all, the transaction was already complete. So it's like, oh, we forgot we're going to throw in a freebie. Secondly, they have no power on this kind of a false and phony basis to get rid of the existing cases, much less as it appears to forgive future wrongdoing. It's like a

preemptive pardon. It won't hold up in court. The whole sick, she bang is going to be flushed.

“But this is one of the worst parts. And it's like, oops, we forgot one more freebie at the end.”

I mean, it's so transparent. We are still a government of laws, not of people. And in these many court cases, we've brought in one. We've seen again and again that our federal trial courts have stood up to Donald Trump. And he's going to fail in these efforts. And, you know, we and many others are going to fight him on this worst of all presidential corruption scandals in the history of our nation. Potts of America is brought to you by Rocket Money. Thanks to the good people at Rocket Money,

I realized that I had been upcharged by a streaming service for access to one show. This was a foreign thing that Hannah and I watched during the pandemic one time, one episode of it, then abandoned it

“and then forgot to cancel it. And we're getting charged like 10 bucks a month in perpetuity. That's”

why you all need Rocket Money. Because they allow you to track subscriptions and cancel them

within the app with just a few taps. In fact, Rocket Money is saved users over $880 million in

canceled subscriptions. You can categorize automatic transactions across your accounts. You can customize categories with tags to help shed light on your spending patterns and much more. You get personalized insights and regular reports and your spending habits. You can even receive real time alerts for large transactions, upcoming bills, refunds, and low balances. And solidate your checking, savings, loans, and investment accounts into a single dashboard to give you a clear picture

of your finances. Rocket Money is a personal finance app that helps find and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitors you're spending and helps lower your bills so you can grow your savings. Let Rocket Money help you reach your financial goals faster. Join at RocketMoney.com/Curcad. That's RocketMoney.com/Curcad. RocketMoney.com/Curcad. Okay, so here's my segue. It doesn't end here. Like the corruption, the malfeasance,

the self-enrichment, the mega-lamania, it all continues. I mean, this is not the only scandal this week.

Fairied in all of this is the news that in the first quarter of this year, Trump made 3700 trades,

not himself, but his accounts. A managing director at a major Wall Street brokerage told Bloomberg in the 40-plus years of my time on Wall Street. This is an unusual amount of trading by any standards. I mean, yes, okay, we all assume Trump was insider trading, but 3700 trades norm. I mean, do you have a sense of the scale of this? I know you're not a Wall Street trader, but it seems I watering. Another trader said that it was insane to have this level of trades and

the enormous dollar value. Many of the equities being traded are companies like Nvidia or Intel where the president is involved in decision making, but given the presidency, involved in decision making for every American company. Now, the Trump organization has said that President does not

forgive me, if I approach anything that they say with a bit of skepticism, given the

“over 30,000 lies that Donald Trump has told, according to Washington Post, Tally,”

you know, the like the Slush Fund scandal Alex, the American people elected Donald Trump to put money in their pockets to make their lives better, to make their lives more affordable, not himself to expand his wealth. So this stock trading scandal is another profoundly concerning case of the president doing the opposite of what he was put in office to do at the contrary and where I'm the publisher. We included both the Slush Fund and the stock trading on our weekly top

ten list. It changes constantly. I started putting together this top ten list and I had to revise it four or five times in the space of 48 hours because there were so many new corruption scandals. So

“how can you pick just ten? It's like Taylor Swift top single. There's just always another one,”

singles. I want to get the language right from the Trump organization, a spokesperson from the Trump organization told Axios President Trump's investment holdings are maintained

exclusively through fully discretionary accounts independently managed by third party financial

institutions with sole and exclusive authority over all investment decisions. Now let me read to you a list of all the companies that Trump traded whose CEO's also norm happened to a company trip on his field trip to China. In video, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Broadcom, Goldman Sachs, micron and a handful more. I mean, are you buying, you don't, you're not buying. Are you, I shouldn't put words in your mouth. The idea that a third party has exclusive authority over Trump's investment

decisions and oh, by the way, some of those big companies just happened to be my, you know, travel buddies as I went to Beijing. No, it's just a co-inquiting. This is another matter that will be investigated. There's no official immunity for doing personal stock trades to the benefit of our president's account. So should the House or the Senate or for that matter state security regulators or anybody else have the occasion? They ought to check whether that's true. And is it really the

case that the president had no awareness? He now knows what's in his accounts. How does he build a wall

“in his brain? So his decision making is not influenced by these stock coldings. I think we're entitled”

to ask highly skeptical questions about this whole pattern, and particularly given the amount of dishonesty and dissimulation on other topics in the past, not to accept it face by you, the statement, oh, the president had nothing to do with it. He's going to build a wall in his brain that Mexico will pay for an arm. I do want to talk a little bit about as we talk about the Megalomania and the corruption. Some of the construction projects that so animate, whatever part of Trump's

brain has not yet been walled off. Where would you prefer to start? There's so many to choose from. The ball room, the no bid multi-million dollar reflecting pool contract, or the Trump arch that the administration is now claiming they don't need congressional approval for because Congress approved a plan for the Arlington Memorial Bridge in the year 1924, 102 years ago,

that contained an arch like structure that was never built for people who are unfamiliar with

this now. This absurd argument, the Washington Post reports that Congress formally ratified a report in 1925 that allowed for the building of Memorial Bridge. However, the columns that were part of that design were not actually constructed and Trump officials today argue that in building the arch, they would be carrying out past lawmakers wishes by building an arch that was maybe at one point part of a design 102 years ago. Where do you want to start, Norm?

disement, not the public interest. I think the granddaddy of them all, the thing that kicked us off

“was renaming the Kennedy Center. And then when artists and audiences fled,”

pretty textually shutting down the center, claiming it was necessary for repairs, we're litigating that case, and others of the matters that you describe as our wonderful partners and colleagues in the democracy movement. So, it started with the Kennedy Center case. Then you have the destruction of the East Wing ballroom where there's a great legal team working on that. We also

we in colleagues also have a piece of that case, Alex, because it turns out that when you demolish

that historic beautiful East Wing, the debris has to go somewhere, Donald Trump's trusted

“to a public park and public golf course in DC, where he dumped it, Alex, it's full of toxins,”

led chromium as best as carcinogens, part of me arsenic, carcinogenic substances, and we're litigating that case of the toxic dumping coming out of the East Wing demolition. And then other folks are working on the reflecting pool, which should be called the 50 shades of blue case, because they can't even match the paint colors. It's so incompetent, like the renaming of the Kennedy Center that caused all those names to emerge. We do that

case for Congresswoman Joyce, babies are our client there. And then you have this archcase, which another group of lawyers is litigating. So, the courts are looking a stance at these projects. We did get a temporary restant restraining order to get information about the Kennedy Center while it was going on here. Donald Trump had claimed there was a one-year review involving outside experts when we got the documents pursuant to a temporary restraining order for Congresswoman

baby to go into the White House for Kennedy Center board meeting and confront the president. It turned out there had been no one year review of the kind that was promised. So these whims are extremely expensive, or the American people. They're extremely damaging to the historic environment, or in the case of these toxic dumping to the humans within the district of Columbia. And it is yet another corruption scandal. And this basket of harbles is also part of our

Contrarian top 10 list. Yeah, I mean, again, a top 10 list that has no

“that should probably be like a top 100 given the number of the candidates you have to put”

on the list. Can we talk a little bit though specifically about the, you know, we would talk about the resistance inside Congress to the slush fund. There's real resistance to the ballroom. The lawsuits could be a way to stop it, but it also, again, it's a legislative branch looking at this and saying, this is totally corrupt. And this is a vanity project. And even Senate Republicans, who I am loathed to give any credit to are, it looks like, I mean, we know almost for certain

that it's going to get dropped, that they're not going to put it in the reconciliation package. The Senate Parliamentarian has been like, nice try. That kind of shit doesn't belong in here.

Do you, I mean, what do you think? I mean, are you surprised that, first of all, there's even

that resistance and do you think that this dies in a legislative branch? Well, when we were talking earlier about the reconciliation laws and how Congress allowed for purely budgetary matters to move with less than 60 votes, you can do it with a simple majority. They put in a role that policy decisions can't be part of that. It has to be pure appropriations. Obviously, it's a huge policy decision in

Parliamentarian, no, I'm not going to let this through. This is not a purely budgetary matter.

“Donald Trump demanded she be fired to his credit. It's a pretty low standard, but majority”

leader, Jonathan, has so far declined to fire her. And the Republicans do not seem to be overruling her. So they let the parliamentarian do their dirty work for them, but they're not pleased about building a golden ballroom in a time of tremendous fiscal challenge and a cost of living crisis for Americans that is exacerbated by this kind of corruption. So that is a positive sign that the system is holding, particularly that wonderful parliamentarian. Yeah, not all heroes wear capes.

Pods of America is brought you by Sunday. So if you ever tried to actually look at the ingredient

list in your dog's food after the first ingredient, good luck for those girls. Traditional storebought

is made using extreme high heat to keep it shelf stable and inexpensive. So brands have to add back synthetic vitamins and minerals in the form of additives whose names you don't understand and definitely cannot pronounce. Is that really what you want your dog eating? No. Sunday's redogs is different. They start with 80% plus all natural meats and then finish with superfoods like kale, ginger, blueberries, and gently air dries them instead of using high heat. Sunday's

doesn't look or smell like dog food. It looks like high quality human grade jerky. No fillers, no nutrition blends, no chemicals, just simple complete nutrition. Founded by Dr. Tory Waxman, Sunday's was created to meet high standards as a veterinarian and as a dog parent. In the best part, Sunday's requires no fridge, no freezer, no prep, no mess. You get the quality of home cook meals with the scoop and serve ease of kibble. It's what dog food should have been all along.

You got to be your dog good stuff. You wouldn't give a, you weren't a part of your family. That's right. Give them, give them healthy jerky. Come on. Amen. Grow up. Make this wish to Sundays. Go right now to Sundays for dogs dot com slash cricket 50 to get

50% off your first order or you can use code cricket 50 at checkout. That's 50% off your first

order at Sundays for dogs dot com slash cricket 50 Sundays for dogs dot com slash cricket 50 or

“use code cricket 50 at checkout. I mean, I think you're so right to point out the sort of”

real economic climate in the country contributing to and really exacerbating the outrage over the corruption. The corruption on its own is eye watering and historic. But the fact that it dovetails precisely with a moment when Americans can't afford hamburger meat and gas and air conditioning and health insurance, it makes it that much more galling. And I think when people in terms of the political moment, people have said, oh, well, the corruption message hasn't stuck

in the way that I think Democrats have wanted it to. We're in a different moment right now. And as you point out, the dichotomy, the the chasm that separates the corrupt activities of this president, the gilding of the ballroom, the arch, the painting of the reflecting pool, many modeled shades of blue for multiple times what it was supposed to cost. All of this seems like the senseless, deeply cynical, completely self-absorbed behavior of someone who at the same time is

asleep at the wheel when Americans need him the most to tackle the one issue he was elected to tackle, which is affordability. I mean, it is, it's really giving Marie Antoinette vibes. You think they would at just point say, let one point say, just like let the meat cake, like that's that's kind of where we are. Where's your, like he's building his own Versailles and the American taxpayer sees what's happening here and they're outraged. And I do think you see it reflected in polls. American say in poll

after poll, that corruption and fighting corruption in government is one of the most important issues for

them that the cost of living and the crisis around the cost of our everyday existence is a very important issue for them. Well, he's basically applying a Trump tax to every American to pay for these construction projects to pay for the $1.8 billion slush bond. And the people see the connection,

“they don't like it. And I think that the public opinion polling demonstrates that this”

corruption's free is a part of why we have the most unpopular president at this point in modern

independence. It's another form of corruption. It's corruption of the rule of law to utilize ice,

the way he has to attack innocent people. He said he protect the border and arrest criminals, not that he would tear moms and dads and kids out of their homes, out of their communities, out of the American economy, or that his ice agents would murder the rené goods and the Alex preties. That corruption of the rule of law also matters. And then you throw in the other scandal that is really broken through like the slush fund or the ballroom or the Kennedy Center.

“And that is the, as broken even bigger, the Epstein files. That's a corruption story. I think the”

American people get it. And I think there's going to be a very serious price to pay. Come,

November. I wonder, you know, you may, I think a lot of people don't know about the garbage from the East Wing demolition being put onto a public park. I believe it is a public golf course that was really inexpensive to play on. And so people from all over the city used to play on that course. And now they can't because it's covered in toxic building materials that Trump unlawfully foisted on the park grounds. The reflecting pool is way over budget. It's not getting done on time

and the work from the reporting we have, at least in the Washington Post, seems to be incredibly

“shoddy. They're holes in the, the waterproofing their bubbles. The blue, as you say, is 50 shades.”

Even as a construction magnate, he's failing at the job. He's failing politically in terms of strategy. He's failing the country in terms of being a leader and adhering to the principles of the Constitution or the letter fila. And he's also failing at the one thing he's like kind of

known for, which is the building part. I wonder, you know, first of all, do you think this stuff

is going to get built? And if it does, what should Democrats do about it? First of all, it might be shoddy, dangerous construction. And second of all, like does anybody, I mean, do we need the arc to Trump? Like what, what do you think should happen to this stuff if it exists once Trump leaves office? Well, we'll need to take it on a case by case basis. You know, that certainly the public park, the golf course that's for families, people of modest means those should be

“reopened. We have to get rid of those toxic substances there. I think we'll accomplish that through”

our litigation. That's the point of doing it. And the Kennedy Center needs to be reopened. We need to protect the independence of the Kennedy Center. So, you know, it's very clear that it cannot be renamed for Donald Trump. Congress has said it must be named for John F. Kennedy. So, we'll have a court order in place. I think on many of these projects where you're going to see is the courts are going to step in. I don't think the arch is going to be built. That is being

litigated. But look, both with the built environment as as with our government in the post-Trump era, we are going to have to rebuild. Fortunately, there are good examples. The United States can learn from both domestically where an internationally where you've had authoritarian regimes replaced and you are able to rebuild and reconstruct in Hungary. You just had a supermajority coalition out of far more entrenched autocrat than Donald Trump in the form of Victor Orban after 14 years.

They're embarking on a very bold rebuilding project. In Brazil, the Bolsonaro regime was out that Lula has built a big tent coalition. He's a man of the left. He's built a larger coalition to do reconstruction there. And of course, we have the examples of what happened in the former iron curtain countries after the end of the Cold War. They were able to rebuild after a much longer, more difficult, struggle, and post-World War II rebuilding. Truth and reconciliation in South Africa.

There's a lot of examples we can learn from. It will start with knocking down, personally, I think some of these monuments to Trump need to be knocked down. But it's what

America back on our course of the fulfilling what Dr. King called the promissory. Now, not yet fully collected on of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. We have to continue that work going forward. But dealing with some of these fiascos, domestic fiascos,

“is going to be a part of that as well, Alex. Well, I think you're so right to suggest that there”

is a path forward, that we can come out of this, that the judicial system will continue to function

in its critical role providing some alternatives and some dose of reality in terms of what the

law says. And also, elections matter, you know, you point out, Orban and Lula, these are those changes of the results of a public saying no longer, no more. And everything that we see suggests the public is overwhelmingly rejecting this corruption and malfeasance and that change, real and significant change could be on the menu after election day of this year. So, you know, norm, as depressing

“as all of this is, I think it's also caused for outrage and engagement. And that I think is”

hopeful, right? Having people involved on a civic level being enraged by their democracy and

wanting to fix it is an unfortunate way to encourage an engagement, but is also a really powerful way

to do it, too. And I'll take it. And that has been the history of our country. And we've seen extraordinary turnout and electoral performance over the past 16 months for a pro-democracy candidates. So, I think the America, we're going to continue to do our work in the courts of law,

“but we're going to count on the court of public opinion to restore that trajectory of progress”

in American democracy and to finally vindicate those unnecessary notes of the declaration of

independence and the Constitution. We will resume that if we all do this together. The great and inspiring and brilliant normites and it's great to see you. It's great to have this in-depth conversation. It's been very helpful for me in understanding this sort of ins and outs of the lawlessness, of all these terrible endeavors embarked upon by Donald Trump, but you know, the work continues. It's great to have you, Norm. Thank you guys for listening.

The guys are off this Monday for the holiday because they're slackers. See you soon. Positive America is a cricket media production. Our show is produced by Austin Fisher, Saul Rubin, McKenna Roberts and Ferris Safari, with Reed-Chirlin, Elijah Cone and Adrian Hill. Our team includes Matt DeGroat, Ben Hefcoat, Jordan Cancer, Charlotte Landis, Kerala V, David Tolz, Mia Kalman, Ryan Young, and Naomi Single. Our staff is probably unionized

with the writer's Guild of America East.