Snap’s “Crucible Moment” Flops On Wall Street

This Father's Day Ferragamo presents there that things I have learned from you collection,

“because a father's influence is reflected in the details, in the way they dress, in the”

appreciation of materials, and in making considered choices. These elements build over time and be part of a shared identity. And Ferragamo wants to highlight the style, assertiveness, and poise that are naturally showcased with the everyday moments between a father and the once they love. Discover Ferragamo's Father's Day Gifting Selection at Ferragamo.com or in-store.

Support for the show comes from Odo. Running a business takes everything you've got, and a lot of the tools out there that are supposed to make your life easier just aren't great at talking to each other. That means you end up having to toggle between a dozen different apps and services just to keep the lights on.

Enough of that.

But there is Odo, the all-in-one fully integrated platform that might actually help

you get it all done.

“Thousands of businesses have made the switch, so why not you try Odo for free at Odo.com.”

That's Odo.com. Support for the show comes from BCX, the public ticker for private tech. The US stock market started history's greatest way of the wealth creation. From factory workers and Detroit to farmers in Omaha, anyone can own a piece of the great American companies.

But today, our most innovative companies are staying private longer, which means every day Americans are missing out until now. Introducing BCX, a public ticker for private tech. Now available wherever you buy stocks. Visit getvcx.com for more info that's getvcx.com.

Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges and expenses, this and other information we found in the funds perspective at getvcx.com. This is a paid sponsorship. Welcome to Proftory Markets. I'm Adelson.

It is June 18, let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The major indices tumbled, following the Federal Reserve's press conference, more on that in a moment Treasury yields spiked as did the dollar and the odds of a rate hike

before the year end on now at 62% on Calshy, meanwhile SpaceX declined for the first time,

since it went public ending the day down 5%. What's happening? Snap just unveiled its new augmented reality glasses and despite a lot of anticipation and a lot of hype, it was a bit of a flop. The glasses called Snap Specs feature an in-frame display which overlays apps onto the

real world. They're priced at $2,195, making them significantly more expensive than matters Ray-Band display glasses which started $800 CEO Evan Spiegel called Snap Specs a leapfrog advancement and the computer of the future, but the market doesn't seem to agree. The stock closed down almost 8% today and it's now off 40% over the past year.

So here it tells more about the Snap Specs and potentially why it was such flop. To Wall Street, we're speaking with Mark German, managing editor and chief correspondent for Bloomberg News. Mark, thank you for joining us. These glasses are all over my social media feed and not in a good way.

One is making fun of them and I've got to say I've looked at these things. I've seen the way that they sit on Evan Spiegel's face, particularly his ears and I just think this thing is way too heavy and cumbersome and they don't seem to look very good. And I wonder if that's the problem here. What do you make of these Snap Specs and also the reaction to them?

I think for the available technology today, something that has augmented reality, something that's an all in one world we'll have said. I think the design actually is quite good and I think the price is actually quite reasonable for the tech. Now I don't think it's reasonable for a mass consumer.

I don't think anything of this ill because going to be coming hit at $2,200 US. But I do think for what the state of the technology is, they are in a fairly good place. I think the 8% decline in their stock is more a reaction to how expensive these are to develop and build and how much money Snap is putting into this product that is unlikely to become a smash hit.

“So I think that's what the concern is stemming from.”

But in terms of the technology, it's intense technology, it's advanced technology. And I think it's an exercise that's showing us what eventually is going to be a mainstream

I'm just not sure Snap is going to be the one to take it to that next level.

“What do we know about how much they're spending on this stuff?”

Because we know that matters been plowing tens of billions into this thing, Apple, the same doing the same thing. But it's almost like they have the capital and the cash flows to do it. Snap is a significantly smaller company and yet they're also going for the big fish in augmented reality.

So what do we know in terms of the spending and whether this is even possible for a company like Snap? They've spent billions on this and I do think it is certainly possible for a company like Snap. If there's a scenario in which there is gigantic demand for these things, I think they are

going to find a way to be able to get these into the hands of consumers.

But I think early on, this is going to be the early adopter of early adopters.

This is going to be developers. This is maybe going to be an enterprise play. If you think about the other products that have launched in this space, none of them have been really taken, have really taken the world by storm with consumers. A lot of these are enterprise products.

And a lot of these companies, they don't even sell the product anymore. Microsoft tried their hands on this with the HoloLens. Meta has tried their hands on this as well. The quest is no longer the priority. It's all about the smart classes.

Magic leap. No longer sells their product anymore.

They've become a AR lens supplier now based in the U.S., the Apple Vision Pro obviously is

not taken off in the way that Apple had anticipated. So this is not a thriving category at this point.

“I think we're still in a very early stage here.”

What is it going to take for this stuff to work? Because we've been hearing about it for such a long time, and it seems like there's issues with how long it lasts in terms of battery, like the look of them, motion sickness, and so many things, what do you think it would look like to see an AR headset that actually is popular?

A lot of things are going to have to converge. You're going to have to see a combination of all the battery life, which we don't have yet. You're going to have to see a price point in the $1,000 to $1,500 range, which we're not at yet.

You're going to have to see that in an all-in-one design that's nearly as thin and light as everyday glasses, and we're so many years away from that. And you're going to have to see that all with visual fidelity and quality, where you can't really tell the difference between the real world and what you're seeing in a displays. Because that technology has to look innovative, has to look impressive, has to look highly

“legible, and so I think we're several years away from hitting any of those metrics, let”

alone all of them converge in simultaneously into a singular product. But what we're seeing from Snap is the closest incarnation to that yet. I just want to read you a tweet that I saw. This is from a user, Uncle Duma. This individual said, quote, "Anyone who has ever built anything can tell you that there's

a point in the development cycle where the sunk costs become too great, and the entire org chart starts walking on eggshells around an exec, who is too tunneled into realize that his product sucks." That was in relation to these snapspecks, and I think it does kind of capture probably what the concerns are on Wall Street, which that Evan Spiegel is the founder CEO.

He has, he and his co-founder, at least, have 99% of the voting power. He decides what to do as a company. He is going full steam ahead with this thing, and I think there are now concerns for the company, which, you know, the stock has been really struggling, that he's out over skis, or maybe in over his head, or too committed to this vision.

I just be curious to get your reactions to that view of Evan Spiegel in the direction of this company. I think investors are asking why are we playing with hardware when, you know, the money is to be made on high margin products, which is applications and software in AI. And so yeah, the big question is why are you from playing in hardware and burning all

this money? And snap, recognize this, this is why they've created a subsidiary called Specsink, which they're running this all through. I think it's going to help, you know, the numbers are able to talk about in their earnings reports, and what have you.

I think that's the driving force behind this, but, you know, they've been investing so much on this for 12 years. They are really one of the pioneers in the AR space. If you think about the lenses and different overlays and such, you can do in Snapchat. So I think there's a lot to like from this product.

It's just not something that people are going to buy. Say this just doesn't work out. Snapspecs, there are no sales, and it really is a flop. What do you think that means for the company? Like, is there a viable way out for Snap if Specs don't work?

Well, the viable way out is being the platform, or the app provider, and becoming a hit software

going to have success with, whether it's Apple, Amazon, or Meta, or even Snap.

Someone is going to do this successfully, and being able to transform Snapchat to being the killer app on that platform, I'm not on that hardware, we'll probably be there next step.

“But I think if this Specs products is not successful, I don't think this is a wrap.”

I think they'll keep trying and keep building and try to get out of subsequent version that's thinner later. My final question for you, Mark, would you have a buy these things or ways things? It's hard to tell. I haven't used the latest version at this point.

I'm going to have to see the use cases and how they would fit into my daily life. I am a huge believer in the AR glass's category. I will say that. All right, Mark, I'm in managing editor and chief correspondent for Plumbug News Mark. We really appreciate your time.

Thank you, thank you, sir.

After the break, the first unanimous Fed rate decision of the year.

And for even more markets insights, you can subscribe to my weekly newsletters simply put at simply put.proftymedia.com. Support for the show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other?

One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. Before you know it, you are drowning in software instead of growing your business. This is where Odu comes in. Odu is the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that handles everything.

CRM accounting inventory, e-commerce, HR and more. No more app overload, no more juggling logins. Just one seamless system that makes work easier. And the best part, Odu replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. It's built to grow with your business, whether you're just starting out or already scaling up.

Plus, it is easy to use, customizable, and designed to streamline every process. So you can focus on what really matters, running your business.

“Thousands of businesses have made the switch so why not you?”

Try Odu for free at Odu.com. That's Odu.com. Support for the show comes from BCX, the public ticker for private tech. For generations, American companies have moved the world forward through their ingenuity and determination. And for generations, every day Americans could be a part of that journey through perhaps the greatest

innovation of all, the US stock market. It didn't matter whether you were factory worker and Detroit or a farmer in Omaha. Anyone can own a piece of the great American companies. But now, that's changed. Today, our most innovative companies are saying private rather than going public.

The result is that every day Americans are excluded from investing and getting left further behind while they select you reap all the benefits. Until now, introducing BCX, the public ticker for private tech. Now available wherever you buy stocks, BCX by fun rise, gives everyone the opportunity to invest in the next generation of innovation, including the companies leading the AI revolution, space exploration,

defense tech, and more. Visit get vcx.com for more info that's get vcx.com, carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the funds prospectus at getvcx.com. This is a paid sponsorship.

Support for the show comes from Odo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with it doesn't different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odo, it's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier.

CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part, Odo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost.

“That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch.”

So why not you? Try Odo for free at Odo.com. That's OdoO.com. We're back with property markets.

In its first decision under chair Kevin Walsh, the federal reserve held rates steady.

It was the fourth meeting in a row that rates went unchanged, but it was the first time this year that the vote was unanimous. Still, the committee is divided on the path forward. Nine officials expect at least one hike this year. Well, eight expects to hold and one expects to cut.

Meanwhile, Walsh declined to submit his own rate forecast and unusual move for a sitting chair. As a reminder, inflation remains elevated, reaching 4.2% in May. The highest reading in three years.

was speaking with Mark Zandy, chief economist at Moody's analytics mark.

Thank you for joining us on the show. The Fed has decided to hold rates here, which no one was surprised by.

“I think the one thing that really stands out to me at least is that the vote was unanimous this”

time, no one voted to cut, which to me says that the Fed and all of its officials are really taking inflation seriously at this point, or at least maybe more seriously than they were before. What do you make of what we saw in this press conference? Yeah, that's right. I think they're taking the inflation very serious as a point out where 4% ish and that's double the

Fed's 2% target and chairwars did make a point several times about price stability in the 2% target, and then you got the dot plots, which are very clear that many of the Fed members want at least one rate hike this year, or thinking there will be at least one rate hike this year and

perhaps two, and that was much more hawkish than I had anticipated, certainly for this first meeting

“for chairwars, so yeah, I was a bit taken aback by how aggressive they were on this first meeting.”

Which is also striking given what the rhetoric we've been hearing from the president, who has been aggressively calling for rates to be cut, this is what he was complaining about with chairpower for the longest time. There was a lot of debate over whether Kevin Wash would kind of obey those demands, those sort of implicit demands, or if he would decide to be hawkish. He has decided to be hawkish here in a lot of ways defying the president. Do you think that this

could be, I don't know, maybe a point of tension moving forward where you surprised by the fact that

he didn't do what the president might have wanted up to do? He couldn't do it, you know,

he wanted to write, I mean he's a vote on a committee with a lot of votes, and clearly the committee bet a very different perspective on things, so even if he wanted to cut interest rates, that wasn't going to happen, and I think the data are pretty clear, I mean it's irrefutable that inflation is just too high, and yeah, there's some arguments as to why that might come back in as the Ron War winds down, and hopefully oil prices come in and stay down, and that translates

through. But there's a lot of reasons to be concerned that it would be more persistent as well, you know, we talked last time about artificial intelligence and the impact that's having on inflation, which would be more durable. So, you know, I think the reality of what's going on is just

“too difficult to ignore, you just can't, and you know, therefore you have to be hawkish.”

The other thing to consider, I don't know if the president would think this way, but you know, I think it's the clearly case that if you start trying to cut interest rates in a world where everything screams, you should be raising interest rates, you make it the federal funds rate target down, you know, by definition, you can get that down because you're the Fed, but long-term interest rates will go to the opposite direction, though a little rise, and in fact they didn't rise today,

so I don't think the Chairman Walsh had any options here, right? He had to go along with this and be very hawkish in the ways presenting things. Yeah, just look at the odds on calcium of a Fed rate hike, it started around 12%, towards the beginning of the year, now we're up to 62%. So, traders believe that the likelihood is that we will see a rate hike, I think I would agree, I would be interested to hear your perspective on that too, but just going to Iran for a moment,

we have seen this deal, memorandum, up for debate, how real we think it will be, but seems certainly more real than previous announcements of deals that we have seen before, because Iran has signed up for this, and they've publicly spoken about it. Did we, did we learn anything from the Fed, or at least on their views of how real this deal actually is, because it seems that what happens in Iran is the most consequential event as it relates to inflation and prices, so it seems

that there's something that we might be able to learn about what's happening in Iran from the federal reserve, did we get any insight on that front or still unclear? I don't know that we get any insight into what's going on with Iran and how they're thinking about it. I'm sure there as uncertain as we are about how this is going to play out, that's playing into their thinking that maybe we need a rate hike or two here just to keep things from becoming even worse. In the context of

the uncertainty around the war, but I didn't learn anything per se about the war and how that

lots of different directions. I will say, I mean, I'll push back on the rate hike. My sense is

the economy is also pretty soft. We did it get a couple of three months of good job numbers, but I suspect that's not going to be sustained, particularly as the deficit-financed fiscal stimulus that we've enjoyed since the beginning of the year fades into the background and we're still

“paying higher prices for a gas line in grocery. So I think the Fed's got a problem, not only”

with inflation, but they are also going to have a problem with growth, which is going to complicate things even further for them. Wow. So you would bet then that we probably won't see a hike this year, I mean, what part of you stand? No, I don't think so. My sense is that it's clearly inflation screams for a rate hike, but the job market will be telling a strong story that rate hikes don't make any sense and maybe rate cut and that'll, that'll go to a draw and we don't get any

change in policy this year and that would be my thinking. So, but you know, a lot of script here to be written, but my sense is as we move into the summer months, the economy's going to

start to weaken again. All right, Marks Andy, Chief Economist at Moody's Analytics. Mark always

appreciate your time. Thank you. He time it. AI is taking an outsized presence in the market

“from AI companies going public to the rise of AI agents trading on a user's behalf. Now more than”

ever investors need to consider what role AI should actually play in their portfolio. So joining us to discuss that is an AI researcher who brought machine learning to Wall Street decades ago. The Zandar is a professor at the NYU Stern School of Business, founder of SCT Capital Management and author of Thinking With Machines, his new book. The Sant, thank you for joining me on the show. You are an AI researcher. You founded a hedge fund that specializes in machine learning and

machine learning based investment. So, you were quite early to this. AI is now taking over.

So, I'd be interested to hear from you how AI is changing investing and if we should be using it to invest. Yeah, you're right. When I went to Wall Street and I brought Machines into Wall Street, it was AI was sort of a, you know, it was a thing that people viewed with suspicion. You know, you had economists who were used to sort of linear models and you had physicists who were used to, you know, physical kinds of models and machine learning sort of fell in this awkward space.

They didn't quite know what to make of it. And my objective really was to see if I could get a machine to learn how to trade. That was just an open question. You know, it wasn't clear to me. That was even possible. And, you know, after a few years, I had a conversation with Scott actually in 2015, you know, called, "Should you trust your money to a robot?" And I sort of broke the investment landscape into three polling periods. You know, high frequency, short-term,

and long-term. High frequency being in today, short-term being days to weeks and long-term being like weeks to months to years. And at that time, my position was that AI had tremendous potential in investing in the high frequency in the short-term space because there was sufficient data. And machine learning methods were actually capable of picking up on the nuances in markets that, you know, the crude linear models sort of missed. And I recall that Scott ended that conversation

by saying, "Okay, so trading flows will disappear, but private equity and, you know, long-term investing is safe." And I said, "Yeah, that's pretty much the case." And ironically, I had a similar conversation with Demoderon in 2015 about, you know, whether we could, you know, simulate him. And at that time, we felt it just wasn't possible with the tools. But in 2022 with, you know, the emergence of LLMs, we sort of revisited that. And now three years later, three-plus years later, you know, we're getting

ready to release the Demoderon bot next month for, you know, commercial use. And I'm fairly confident that we've actually managed to simulate his kind of thinking to a reasonable degree. So to the extent that you actually believe in sort of a free cash flow model to the firm, you know, fundamentals

“opposed to investing, we've actually managed to do that reasonably well. So, you know, I think we're”

close, you know, we're there where AI can actually play a pretty significant role in sort of long-term systematic investing. Well, was it about long-term investing that made it difficult to use machine-learning for long-term investing previously? I mean, we know that machine-learning has been used for high-frequency trading, you know, the stuff that is less long-term short-term stuff.

So, you know, the traditional view of machine learning is supervised learning. You have examples

“that you learn from. This just won't sufficient examples of training data to learn from,”

right? That, you know, you know, the Demoderon is sort of exceptional in the, in terms of the number of reports he's written, you know, which go into sort of the low thousands maybe at this point. But that isn't sufficient data to really train an AI, like, you know, considering how compared to how much data there was in the herbrickens in the short-term space. So, they just wasn't enough training data. What's different now, you know, and this is something I write in my book,

is this emergence of general intelligence, whether machine knows something about everything, and the division between common sense reasoning and expertise is broken down, right? To me, that's like the big deal about AI that's made it a general purpose technology. That was

always the hindrance, you know, that we sort of drew this artificial boundary between expertise

in common sense. And with LLMs, that became available. So, now you can build on the sort of substrate of, you know, a machine that has common sense. And you don't need as much training data, because it's ingested sort of the wisdom of humanity on the internet. And now it's a question of, like, you know, tilting it in an appropriate direction, such as a value or a fundamental

“approach, like the mother and does. Right? And that's what's made it feasible for, you know,”

reasoning about sort of long, longer-term investment horizons. I'd be curious what Demoder and thinks of the Demoder and bot. Have you spoken with him about it? Does he have a view on the fact that he's been automated to a degree? So, I've discussed the SpaceX valuation with him, you know, published his report. And then that ran the bot several times on it. And I shared it with Demoder and asked him what he thought. And he thought that it's thinking is, you know,

mirrors his, you know, relatively closely, even though the bot was much more bearish than he was. So, his valuation was like 1.2 trillion. The bot had a hard time justifying anything above half a trillion. So, he actually feels that it does a reasonably good job of simulating him. Where Paul's short in my estimation is in sort of the quality of framing questions. Right? He has a sort of exceptional ability to sort of frame the problem in a way that then sort of,

you know, drives the analysis. You know, we tried really hard to do that. And the machine's got quite good at actually, you know, coming up with these framing questions. But in my estimation, that's where it's called short, you know, relative to its master. Well, half a trillion dollars on SpaceX.

“I think this is the Demoder and Bot might be the first. Well, the only person”

entity in the market is there's more bearish on SpaceX than I am. So, it's quite a striking number. The SunDar is Professor NYU Stern, founder of SCT Capital Management and author of Thinking With Machines. The Sun. This is fascinating. Thank you for joining us. Thanks for having me on the show here. We end this episode back where we began with a few words of remembrance

for SNAP. I know Mark is more optimistic about the technology and the company. But the stock has fallen more than 90% in the past five years. It is now less valuable than Domino's pizza and roughly as valuable as the gap and to add insult to injury. They have now come out with what might be the ugliest wearable in wearables history. And that is saying something. In addition to weighing 132 grams, which is five times heavier than a regular pair of glasses and about as heavy

as a baseball, the SNAP specs were also incredibly expensive to build. The company

dished out an estimated three and a half billion dollars creating this product, which is equal to

more than half of the company's annual revenue. In other words, unlike Apple, which made a somewhat calculated gamble on its headset, SNAP has literally bet the farm on this thing. And Evan Spiegel has said as much. He called this launch his crucible moment and the street was still less than impressed. The stock immediately lost a tenth of its value. SNAP has been sliding for a long time now. But in my view, this might just be the nail in the coffin. In the words of

Dr. Sus, my message to shareholders is the following. Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened. SNAP, we will miss you. Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Brad Williams. Our research team is Dan Schlon. Isabella Kinsel, Kristen O'Donnell, Hugh and Mia Savaria. Our social producer is Jake McPherson. Thank you for listening to Prophecy Markets from Prophecy Media.

If you liked what you heard, give us a follow. I'm Ed Alison Tune in tomorrow for a conversation

So why make it harder with it doesn't different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing O'Donnell.

It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform

that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part,

“O'Donnell replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over”

thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try O'Doo for free at O'Doo.com.

That's O'DoO.com.