03-26-26 Part One - A DHS Stalemate

Melka Groser, Schmonzville, Hase.

Up 90 grams, for just 1 euro, 920. Or a Vila Delvia Frischkeze. Up 150 grams, for just 980 cents. Al-Di. Good is for all.

And news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show, from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Rethai Radio. We are Rethai Radio. He is Rethai.

I'm Gary McNamara.

Eric has the morning off, so it's me.

And you. When Eric's gone, I changed positions in the studio. Just busy, trying to organize everything because there's so much to talk about today. And I look in front of me, there's three microphones, and I don't know which one. I don't know which one I'm on.

So there was a little pause of me getting on. That was the problem. Like, what microphone am I going to use here?

“There's three of them sitting right in front of me, you know, like which one is it?”

Oh, man. So I have the right one, though. So we're all set. Before we go any further, just something that we had asked for the last couple of days about any deal.

And we know that the deal that the Republicans were talking about, that's dead. Republicans didn't like it. Democrats didn't like it. So where they are now, who knows? But I did find out.

I did do some research and finally found out because one of the things we talked about is so many of the stories, you could not find, you know, the specifics of, do they, do they want to claw back money from the big beautiful bill or is for future spending? It's for future spending.

That 75 billion would still be there to fund ice.

“The Republicans want additional spending for it, and that's what the Democrats don't want.”

And the Democrats also want to put certain rules and regulations on ice. And the Republicans have said no on that. So that's where we stand right now on that, which I thought was, which I thought was interesting. And so we'll see where it goes. I have no idea where it's going to go right now.

Trump said, you know, he's going to call up the National Guard if need be. But one thing that has happened is that ice has had a great deal of success at the airports that they have been at. And so that's a, that's a good thing. Um, what else do I want to start to show off with here?

Um. Oh, yeah, we had talked yesterday because one of the questions that I get all the time from

“Republicans is, you know, are we going to lose the house?”

Are we going to lose the Senate? And we talked about the challenges and the problems that the Republicans have. But one of the things that we have said over and over again is that the Republicans best chance of winning is the Democrats because whatever the numbers are for Republicans, they're lower for Democrats.

And it was interesting because I, as I was going through looking at a bunch of different op-ed pieces of, uh, from a variety of different publications out there. I came upon Carl Rove in the Wall Street Journal, Republicans biggest asset Democrats, even with the GOP's numbers underwater, the other parties are somehow worse. Goes the outcome of the midterms largely depends on the popularity of the president.

His job approval in the real clear politics average of recent polls is only 41.3% with 56.3% disapproval of president's approval numbers as low, generally proceed a significant loss of how seats for his party. But Mr. Trump's popularity isn't the only consequential number. The RCP average for the Democrats is at 35.8% in favorable at 55.7%.

The Republican party does better. How did the Democrats become less popular than Donald Trump?

How did the Democrats become less popular than Mr. Trump?

“It took many years, much hard work, wacky policy stances and plenty of missteps.”

Even the real clear politics generic house ballot is a problem for the Democratic parties midterm prospects, although Democrats lead Republicans 46.9% to 42.1% that my point to only modest Democrat gains in the house. Only a handful of districts is up for grab this fall. Prognosticator suggests there are 17 districts that are toss up, 13 are held by Republicans

for by Democrats on top of these 13 seats held by Democrats and two held by Republicans that lean blue and one Democratic and three Republican seats that lean red.

Finally, there are two GOP seats and one held by an independent that are considered

solidly Democrat after recent redistricting shenanigans all together, though, that isn't a lot of targets for Democrats, if they swept all 39 at receipts that would translate into a gain of 21.

“That's about half the 41 seat booths that they saw in 2018 when their generic ballot”

advantage before the election was 7.3%. Congressional Democrats are not doing much to advance their cause. Their affordability gender agenda is not good. Many Democratic candidates act as if trashed Mr. Trump is all they need to do. The public also increasingly blames Democrats for the federal government shutdown, air traveler

standing in line for hours to get through security might wish to just go after all politicians, but the Democratic insistence on no funding for ice is plain to the base. It is led by senior House Democrat Virginia's done buyer to concede that tactic isn't forcing any changes in the meantime we're making people hurt. It's missed an off ramp during Mark Wayne Mullins confirmation hearings for Homeland Security

Secretary Democrats could have pressed him to negotiate in good faith on specific changes they wanted. This would have given Americans a better idea of the Democrats demands. The reason that they have to wait in those TSA lines if Mullin refused to negotiate Democrats could have voted against him and had a better argument to make against voters.

If he didn't negotiate, they might have gotten much of what they wanted instead. They look bad to make things worse. Leading Democrats keep saying foolish things in public, Governor Gavin Newsom claimed California is a lower tax state than Texas or Florida.

Here can I have never got to that one.

That was blown out of the water by the way. Tell that to all the tax refugees leading the Golden State Governor Kathy Hulkel running in 2022 told New York Republicans to just jump on a bus and head down to Florida where you belong. Okay, get out of town.

Last week she said she's looking for people with high net worth to support the generous social programs of New York. Maybe the first step should be go down to Palm Beach and see who you could bring back home. Ms. Hulkel may have discovered that it was a mistake to raise taxes, but her answer isn't to cut them and restrain spending, it's defined what she calls patriotic millionaires

who'd move back north. Good luck with that. Even with all that going against the Democrats or Republicans have to up their game and soon the off your in special elections have been awful for the GOP, but White House is counting on a successful end of the Iranian conflict and a booming economy with dropping

inflation in the third quarter if these don't materialize and the latter is unlikely the GOP

will be left to hope Democrats keep providing vivid contrast points that drive swing voters right word. So, and I would agree with him on that analysis.

“I've disagreed with Rov at times on other things, but I think he's right on on that.”

Because everything really comes down to prices, but on the Iranian situation, it all depends on how, if you had what the president was talking about in his eight-minute speech, when the military action started, and you had the people of Iran on the streets all cheering, subtype of interim government in there and forces protecting the nuclear stockpile, but really the imagery of the Iranians cheering would be huge, because then there's no way

look at these hundreds of thousands of people that are celebrating, and it's going to be

a tough go, but now you've got other Middle Eastern countries saying they want to help Iran, they want to do peace deals with Israel, you get to that point, you know, I don't know, I don't think that it would change as many independences I would like because of the price problem right now, because of prices and where they are right now. And, guess, that's a problem, and the president knows it's a problem, they all know

“it's a problem, and that's why the president keeps saying, you know, we want this thing,”

you know, we're going to take it to a conclusion soon, saw the Wall Street Journal, it's like Trump telling his people, we need to wrap this thing up with this war can't go on forever, and it's like, well, what's the, you saw criticism yesterday, even from Republican leadership, we don't know what they plan on doing, well, I'll tell you this, one of the reasons you may not, and I think it was Mark Halpern, who had a orchestra, Mark Halpern,

who said it yesterday, he was like, look, he goes, they don't want to let Republicans or Democrats know what's going on, they're afraid of leaks, they're especially afraid that the Democrats will leak what the war plan is, because if you saw that, that was one of

“the headlines that came out of it, Republican leadership wants to know what's going on,”

you know, why aren't they telling us, and it's like, well, they don't want it to be leaked. The other thing is when it comes to how you end the war, we don't know yet. What is the conclusion of the war? What does that mean? We'll go through the damage it has been done to Iran, and those are legitimate questions, but as we said, from the very beginning, those Democrats are

up there saying, Iran is winning the war. You're delusional. Uh-huh, at the minimum, as

we have said, they've set back at the very, very minimum, even if the revolutionary

your guard stays in power at the minimum, they're done for the longest time, and there's

“been a lot of discussion, will the, uh, will the administration, you know, declare victory,”

cooperation, uh, with parts of whatever the Iranian government is, and at the same time, Israel has the, Israel has the approval from the United States to go and mop up whatever they wish to mop up. That's part of some of the discussion that I was seeing yesterday, from, you know, especially military, certain military, a bunch of different military experts saying, okay, what do you do at this point? How do you politically win this at the same

time strategically win this? And you have that, you win that through Israel, keeping, you know, uh, you know, military action going in specific ways. Uh, what is a president plan on doing with the troops that are, that are being sent over to the Middle East? We don't know, uh, and he's not saying. And if I'm president Trump with all the leaks that he has had, and even in his administration, people that wish to work against him as we saw with Joe

Kent, I wouldn't tell anybody anything either. I'm not going to tell you what my military strategy is. We want to win this. I don't trust anybody, anybody trust Democrats not to leak what the president's plan would be if he announced to the even the highest leaders of Congress? Look, they don't give a damn about American citizens, those same Democrat leaders want sanctuary cities. They wish to protect criminal illegal immigrants. So now, you know, you, you, you know,

you don't get it. Now the president will be judged on however this thing ends up, but in the meantime, you know, as every president would be, by the way, but in the meantime, I wouldn't,

the last thing I do has been telling members of Congress, here's what we plan on. Well, we need to

know exactly what the war plan is at this particular point. No. No. I don't trust you. You'll leak it. So there's a way out right now. All right.

Got a great show. We are right. I radio brought to you by Hot Shot Secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis,

“a transport safety expert at JJ Tyler at a roadside inspection inspectors may ask to see”

supporting documents. These documents can include bills of lighting, itineraries, schedules, or equivalent documents that indicate the origin and destination of each trip. That can also include dispatch or trip records, expense receipts related to on duty/not driving periods, electronic mobile communication transmitted through a fleet management system, and payroll records, settlement sheets, or equivalent documents that indicate payment to a driver.

Drivers using paper logs must also keep toll receipts. Supporting documents must contain the

driver's name, carrier assigned identification number, or vehicle unit number that can be linked to the driver, the date, the name of the nearest city town of village, and the time. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at jadekeller.com. , here when I radio, he is our crony and I'm Gary McNamara, Eric has the morning off coming to find the bottom of the hour. The status of the war, just what

have we done, how have we decimated Iran, because it's just, it's humorous to watch the Democrats, you know, and we're not really accomplishing anything. Of course we are. What have we accomplished, we will let you know, look, we're looking at this from a realistic standpoint. When you fight a war, we understand that the politics in the United States to get the job done is something that's

“extremely important. Get in the support from the people of the United States for,”

especially if you're going to go a long term. You will get that approval if you get a victory, and I would say if you get a victory in the next month, and the victory is transparent. You can define the parameters of the victory that is very easily understood by the American people. We've already laid out what the ultimate victory would be, which would be the hundreds of thousands of Iranian people on the streets saying that they're free. There's an interim government.

The United States is still, you know, promising the Iranian people that the massacres aren't going to happen anymore, and if the new transition government or the government, whatever it ends up being, if they get out of line, you know, we will take care of them. If you have something like that, and the people in the United States can see it, that would be the absolute ultimate victory. But strategically, we've decimated the Iranian military.

We have decimated command and control. We have decimated the leadership there, which is one of the problems. They really don't know who's in charge. They talk about the Parliamentary leader, and whether they might be able to negotiate with him, still don't know whether he has any

clout with whatever's left of the leadership of the Revolutionary Guard. There's so many unknowns here,

and I saw that the best war strategy Iran has right now is the unknown. When you don't know what's going to happen and how it's going to end, and what victory actually is, it is the unknown that creates a political problem for the president here in the United States. You don't know how it's going to end, because the goal was just not to knock out the military. The goal was, even though they denied it, a front, the goal was regime change.

“That was always the goal, and to get to that goal, you have to rely on the people of Iran,”

which means it's out of your control. The only way it's in your control is if you find leadership that is willing to be monitored by the United States to make sure that they do each and every thing that we would want in some kind of a deal. And do I see that coming in the next couple of weeks? Highly unlikely.

Tired of partisan noise. America's more divided than ever, but independent Americans is adding

Pressing issues of the day, the leaders who are shaping what America will be in the future.

“We're going to bring the righteous media five lives, independence, integrity, information,”

inspiration, and impact. Join the movement, independent Americans, from belief, follow and listen on your favorite platform. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Backer Studio. We are Red Eye Radio. I'm Gary McNamara. Eric has the morning off. How is the military part of the war going? Because you hear a lot of stuff out there, even a few that Iran is

winning the war, Noah Rothman wrote an op-ed piece, or not an op-ed piece wrote in the National Review, that unlike the Iraq War, there's just a list here of a bunch of things that we've

“accomplished. So be patient because you don't really hear a lot of this. You don't hear.”

We'll strategically what is happening. What are our victories? Unlike the Iraq War, there was no long prelude to this war, but like the Iraq War, this conflict began with an attempted decapitation strike this time it succeeded. U.S. Israeli forces neutralized roughly 40 senior Iranian leadership figures in the opening of the war. As a conflict progressed, Iran's

armed forces and intelligence leaders, national security figureheads, senior Islamic revolutionary

guard corps, and paramilitary commanders, and the brain power behind Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program met the same phase, a fate. Israeli forces lure Iranian military targets

“into kill boxes of their choosing make direct phone calls to individual commanders to intimidate”

them into surrendering, hunt them down, hunt them down in the wooded hills to which they fled. Iran's command and control is decentralized, but these operations have contributed to Iran's inability to coordinate strategically coherent attacks on U.S. Israeli and Gulf region targets. Meanwhile, the U.S. Israeli campaign has enjoyed spectacular tactical successes on the battlefield,

but then the first two weeks of the war. U.S. and Israeli forces unleashed a blistering wave of

strikes on Iranian air defenses, radar systems, missile launches, missile launch and storage facilities, drone capabilities, naval mines, air bases, and the pillars of regime stability. The Iranian Air Force is gone. Most of Iran's air and missile bases have been rendered inoperable. Its naval installations along the Persian Gulf incapacitated and about 120 Iranian ships were disabled or sunk. What remains of Iran's once formidable network of terrorist proxies across the Middle East

was decimated. Their leadership ranks to capitated and their local support networks disrupted or entirely wiped off. As the U.S. Israeli war against Islamic Republic entered its fourth week, their joint force embarked on what their military brass called "Face Two of the War." Taking out Iran's military infrastructure, the U.S. and Israel hit Iran's nuclear facilities, including those that were struck in June of 2025, as well as new targets, including undeclared nuclear

sites. U.S. Israeli strikes also began targeting Iran's defense industrial base, its missile production facilities, drone manufacturers, explosive production plants, and sensitive electronic

developers came under sustained bombardment. Before the end of the third week of fighting,

the United States had achieved command of the skies in southern Iran sufficient enough to deploy vulnerable air assets like the A10 Thunderbolt and Apache attack helicopters over the state of Hormuz to strafe small fast attack boats and disabled drones in flight. Similar air superiority had already been achieved over Iran's northwest, including the capital city, allowing the non-stelt aircraft to execute sorties using precision-guided gravity munitions and allowing the U.S.

to decrate Iran's ability to launch ballistic missiles, with which Iran has terrorized its neighbors

“from the onset of the war. Their air forces obstruct Iran's buried missile storage facilities”

and abrupt aboveground arsenals. They loiter above the entrances to intact bunkers hitting them only when they spot activity. As of March 23, the Israeli Defense Forces estimate that about 330 of Iran's 470 ballistic missile launchers have been rendered inoperable or inaccessible. The roughly 4,700 strikes on Iran's missile program alone are estimated to have eliminated

70% of Iran's launch or array contributing to a 90% decrease in Iran's missile launch capability.

Sumeranian drones and missiles continued to evade the region's layered air defense systems, striking civilian infrastructure and non-combatant targets, like urban and suburban neighborhoods,

“with devastating effect, indeed to evade Israel's anti-missile defenses Iran has deployed”

cluster munitions against Israeli civilian targets, a tactic with no objective other than to maximize civilian casualties, but unlike Iran's coordinated drone strike on Saudi Arabian oil processing facilities. In 2019, for example, Iran's missile attacks on its neighbors lack the coordination to achieve any strategic effect. They have not set any of Iran's regional targets of their will to support and prosecute the war against this regime. And for all the visible signs of stress

in the political class in Washington that this war has exposed Iran is reeling to. The statements issued by the remnants of its leadership are frequently contradicted by the actions of its field

“commanders suggesting a breakdown of communications. The degree to which Iran's omnidirectional”

attacks on soft targets across the Middle East have been boldened its neighbors to back the U.S.-Israeli campaign or even to actively participate in it. Wow, has cast in this Iranian leadership and compelled them to issue conciliatory pronouncements which again were betrayed as hollow by continued Iranian attacks on its neighbors. Idea of military intelligence has identified low morale,

absenteeism and burnout among a revolutionary guard ballistic missile units within the past week,

the Institute for the Study of War reported Tuesday night that the IDF said that ballistic missile unit soldiers have refused to go to one site due to the fear of Israeli strikes. U.S. assets are still pouring into the region. We know about the 82nd airborne and the marine units and thousands of U.S. Army paratroopers in route to the Gulf as the U.S. Israeli air campaign methodically neutralizes Iran's power projection capabilities, meanwhile Iranian representatives

insist that the state of Hormuz is in fact open despite reports that Iran laid about one dozen naval mines in its waterways, those vessels that neither participate in nor support acts of aggression against Iran can pass safely Iran said so long as they pay an extortion fee opening the straight to maritime traffic, which U.S. commanders repeatedly assured anyone willing to listen would happen eventually following the significant degrading of Iran's military capabilities will

follow the clearing of the straits mines and the elimination of the Iranian road mobile anti-ship missile threat possibly with deployment of the marine amphibious reddish groups on the ground that would be a dangerous operation if successful though demonstrating that the straight is cleared to merchant and naval traffic would be to duplicate the operations in the Gulf in which the U.S. Navy engaged in 1970 and 1988 if such an operation succeeded it would deprive Iran of some one of its last points of leverage

against the West. There is a temptation abroad in the press at least to yada yada away these spectacular tactical successes in combat against a nation that is recently as 2022 commanded one of the most

set into motion a sequence of events that would eventually end in its destruction but it was by no means foreseeable at the onset of this decade that the Iranian threat would suffer such a long-sighted series of defeats so there you go and they go the U.S. and its allies have been wargaming scenarios involving conflicts with Iran for decades those simulations provided western war planners with little confidence that such a mission would succeed rather it was likely to

stoke a global conflict typified by terrorist attacks throughout the West and unacceptable losses on the Middle Eastern battlefields and following a sustained and bloody war it was by no means

“assured that the United States would achieve its objectives quote compared to what is a crucial”

question answering its ground observers conclusions is a set of empirically verifiable conditions and test and test them against conceivable counterfactuals compared to those scenarios this war has so far been a spectacular tactical success so there you go just wanted to I know that was a little bit long but I don't even hear a lot when I just go through just social media and generally just the narrative that you see from the networks overall the specifics of tactically whether

we're winning this thing or not you know there's always that and to us it's never been a question

if you're listening to show you know we obviously you know we have it's more on how how do you

“get regime change how do you get that point of getting regime change we've already heard that”

the the White House the United States has said no to the former Shaw's son going in saying nope don't want to work with him he's been a way too long we need to find somebody inside the country to to work with we don't know what that may be at this time even though we have seen that the the leader of the parliament has been viewed as something as someone that some believe not all but some in the administration believe that they could get to cooperate with the United States

others believe that's not the case so that's really the great unknown is how do you get the regime change how do you get that now even if you don't get that you have decimated Iran for the next decade is that enough though you see that Saudi Arabia in the United Arab Emirates they don't believe it they they look at it and the other points is in brought up as Israel Israel knows this is the closest they can get they've gotten to to decimate completely

and get regime change in Iran so even if the United States backs off the other thought the the the process the other thought is that all right we're just going to use Israel Israel will do it Israel will just keep going after anybody who gets into a leadership role and because there's there's no military to to do anything against Israel and then the

United States will probably be involved in covert activities that we'll never know about

but that's the big question what is the declared victory military yes we have a huge military

“victory what's the political victory because that's what will drive public opinion here in the”

United States and worldwide we are Red I radio we'll be right back with more Red I radio with every currently and Gary McNamara we're on I radio he is there currently he has a morning off I'm Gary McNamara I don't wow I was just reading a little while ago Steve Hilton who's running for Governor of California just blasting the the Democrats in California

for basically forcing the cancellation of the debate yesterday it's like all the top people you know

the Democrats we've seen this we saw in Texas the Democrats are now realizing that probably

you could throw a white woman in there too yeah just too funny

“top of the hour news is brought to you by how products is at how products dot com”

this is Red I radio on Westwood one now it's Red I radio Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day whether you're up late or you're just starting your day welcome to the show from the relief vector studios this is Red I radio

all across America we are Red I radio he is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara Eric has the morning off

I'm here here here and let me a little sip of water and no coffee no just sip of water I'd coffee when I woke up it's all I need all right let's continue this

“narrative one of the things that we started a couple of weeks ago was what we believe is the”

Democrats new strategy and that's to be stupid that the that politicians and media people political activists that support Democrats want to put out the message to the world to their own Democrats constituents that vote for them that we are stupid just like you we don't know how to do basic tasks you know these things are just too complicated for us and it all started a couple of weeks ago I just want to go through it before I give you more

evidence here of where the Democrats are going just for those people that might not have heard when Bernie Sanders came out and then governor Newsom of California said "I don't know how to find our burps or difficult but we don't have the capability of doing it and then on morning Joe the other day you had Mike Barnacle you had Joe Scarborough and then Mika the exact same thing we don't know and no idea I would know how to find my burps or

difficult and as we're calling it we're well we're out of different names one of it is one of it is caveman uh caveman lawyer marketing and it goes back to the old SNL bit uh with uh with the late Phil Hartman where he was the caveman lawyer and he just I don't know how to operate in your fancy world I'm just a caveman

“and he would you know that's how he would address the jury in a number of cases and it's the same”

thing that they're doing they and what I believe happened is they cannot they realize they got caught and you know they were doing you know they're pulling and found out that you just can't say that we can't have voter ID because it's racist because minorities don't have the capability of getting their burps or difficult or having ID because the polling was just so against it and there was some pushback in the last month as they were promoting it I remember one focus group

I forgot who did the focus group I don't know if it was CNN or Fox but there was a young white male well you know minorities they don't have the capability of and this black woman just said what are you talking about that's racist what do you mean we do of course we do we have license we have this and the polling they're getting killed on you know by having you know

by by using that excuse which has never worked for them they've never they've never moved in

inch by claiming that it's racist but they got there was pushback calling them racist so where do you go from that point and we figured they they had a workshop this because this is now you've had a number of Democrats come out and say it in the media and actually Democratic politicians including Democrat Senate leader Chuck Schumer they are incapable of finding or even trying to find

people that vote for us now we're not calling them stupid we're saying this is their marketing plan

“we can't use the racism card anymore so we'll use the stupid card we're the stupid leaders or”

we're the stupid media that is incapable of doing common tasks that the rest of the population can do and all those smarty pants Republicans say well we can do it well we can because we're all victims their victims of their own stupidity and I saw this audio cut yesterday and said and we we've talked about this before the using young people who sit there and when we talk about long

held Democrat established points of view they claim complete ignorance like we never heard of

what are you talking about this never happened and this happened on CNN and this was where Adam Mockler he's only 23 years old he's a commentator for Midas Touch Network they were originally packed in March of 2020 that formed in order to go against Donald Trump and now they're a political activist they call themselves a news company they're a political activist organization they're not looking for the truth and they've got a lot of young people now trying to put out the message

and as we have said Democrats have been changed on anything as long as they continue to promote the radical transgender movement you know they're not going to change on anything as long as they continue to promote their opinions on voter ID that nobody is buying as long as they continue to say we want to protect criminal illegal immigrants as long as they continue to lie about ice you know they're not going to change any of their opinions well uh huh this is on this is a

Scott Jennings with this Adam Mockler from the Midas Touch Network which again is a bunch of leftist political activist talking about you know and Scott Jennings talking about well

the higher gas prices this is what you've always wanted this was a goal of the Democrat

party here we go here's this audio from CNN it's going to be a big blue wave it already was going to be before the war in Iran and this is the most like visceral change that we've seen so far when I drove to the airport today I passed by two gas stations and I was paying attention American

“families are paying attention to this yeah I'm old enough to remember when Democrats were advocating”

for higher gas prices bring about the end of the internal combustion you only have to be fine now now all of a sudden gas prices are we gonna come across a gas prices all that really all I want higher gas prices and gas prices well we'll see to drive you hear that now they're denying that they didn't want higher gas prices and that Adam Mockler is leading it well what they're doing they're bringing in you know I'm too young to know what the Democratic party actually stands for and has

stood for and we know it because we've seen what happened in Virginia they want to bring back the same environmental rules that will raise gasoline prices and as we played the other day from Obama we had case we have to go into the archives to pull out that skyrocketing because of what's going on in New York right now with Kathy Hockel and it's like well we can't we we the name these environmental rules that we passed that she was for what we we've got to slow down because

it's raising the cost of energy and it's crushing people well that was the goal the goal was to raise energy prices if the goal was to skyrocket electricity prices Obama said it back in February of 2008 and it's all because of the whole climate change and now you've got Mockler going oh what

“did you talk well what Democrats said that what Democrats said that do I believe he knows yes he's using”

his youth to pretend that he's ignorant on it and but the rest and we're saying the same thing I go what do you talk about what Democrat was ever for this and it reminds us if Eric was here

that is against voter ID not one not one Democrat and this is where you are right now this

“goes back to car rolls column that we read in the first hour they talked about the fact that you know”

the Republicans best chance not to lose seats in November is the Democrats because they continue to promote things that the American public doesn't want but think about it in New York this is where the Democratic Party is the Democratic Party wanted to skyrocket electricity prices and gasoline prices and on gasoline prices there you have it on CNN oh we don't know who wanted to do that we're just nobody wanted to do that we're ignorant we're ignorant we're stupid

we don't know what the Democratic Party has always stood for they wanted gasoline prices to skyrocket

because they wanted to force people into electric vehicles they said it over and over and over again now there we don't know what you're talking about man we're just we're just a bunch of idiots we don't know and electricity prices they wanted electricity prices to skyrocket so solar and wind that is more expensive to produce that you would even out the cost of it and so people you know would be forced you could raise the the price of oil raise the price of natural gas

get rid of coal all those rules and regulations were to make it so more expensive

“electricity would be forced on the American public that's what New York wanted to do”

and I find it interesting this maze the Kathy Hockel is trying to maneuver around right now well we we just can't do it we have to we have to slow down on this why would you want to slow down and even the the left the far left's going what are you talking about no this is what we wanted we want gasoline prices to skyrocket we want electricity prices to skyrocket the whole plan was created to do that just like the border i still read out i think i read

an article yesterday it was in some conservative publication

that said now the problem is it was the failure of the uh it was the failure of the

Biden administration uh to not close the border no it was the success of the Biden administration to open the border that was the whole goal the goal was to open the border the goal was to skyrocket gasoline prices in the Democratic Party the goal was to skyrocket electricity prices and have this legislation and you see in Virginia they take over going we're all about affordability and what do they do taxes on this taxes on this let's raise energy cost let's do more of the environmental

stuff and the voter falls for it some of the voters fall for it i don't want to apply that all the voters fall for it because you don't and i don't and Eric does but i just find it interesting that the Democrats are now and and Kathy Hockel she was in western New York a couple of my buddies were telling me about it yesterday you see Hockel in New York and i went yeah she's saying i need your help i need your help people i need your help but it's like

“help for why you should see the responses on social media these are all people to all New Yorkers”

that were coming on it and they were just like what are you talking about this is this was your goal the goal of the Democratic Party is to skyrocket energy prices that's the goal and so you're saying i need your help to save me from myself how do you deal with that oh electric publicans really interesting pole done in New York that we will have for you next

trusted guarantee since nineteen twenty product of u_s_a_ labeling for beat poultry and eggs

rolled out this week as part of national agriculture week is also among the several components within u_s_d_a_s_b_ faction plan a collaboration between agriculture department mission areas and cabinet level agencies to rebuild the nation's cattle supply while continuing to build consumer demand for beef as well as expand processing capabilities under secretary for food safety midi brochures explains in addition to the product of u_s_a_ labeling within her mission area

“another important aspect of that is what we call beef modernization related to the”

inspection of beef for food safety and inspection systems what we are focusing on is allowing

more technical information to be applied to our inspection systems the under secretary says similar modernizations have occurred within the pork and poultry industries i'm roddane reporting for the u_s_ department of agriculture in washington d_c_ this report brought to you by senate fuels and loubs yet in touch with what i radio told free at eight six six ninety red eye we are on radio he is a party and i'm going back to our area has the morning off so i guess i said uh

how do you how do you get rid of the insane democrat policies that elective republican uh in

the uh local race for governor this year uh according to a again this was a campaign poll taken by g_o_p_ uh candidate uh Bruce Blakeman from uh national county executive shows the uh the race now in single digits c_n_ a_ did a poll

“but last month whatever showed him twenty points behind now this one shows remember his”

his own campaign poll yeah i mean it's a legitimate polling group that did it was the one-locked and associates are considered a conservative bolster but so is uh rashmison and they they're quite accurate so uh again there are their flaws in this i don't know but it's being promoted and it's being promoted as new yorkers are furious about electricity prices and energy prices but the new poll shows him just nine points behind local fifty two to forty

three with less than eight months until uh election day but you know something even though they're they're panicking and locals panicking about uh electricity prices look at california for example california democrats love high gasoline prices they love high get california independence love high gasoline prices they love the high cost of living they keep voting democrats in if you had the policies for example and in a in an Oklahoma

a Texas whatever and you were paying you were paying a dollar a dollar fifty more with the refineries gone they're talking about maybe two dollars and fifty cents more for a gallon of gasoline the media would destroy you and if you were still promoting that you'd lose elections california you don't lose elections they're okay with it they want high gasoline prices well they bought into the delusion that the world is ending

“which it is not and remember that's why in New York their whole environmental law”

to skyrocket you know their cap and trade law was to skyrocket electricity prices that was the goals we played for you yes the other day from Obama in 2008 this isn't an accident it was calculated this is what they want New York democrats want high gasoline prices they want high electricity prices they just want to pretend during an election that they're lowering it then it goes right back again and democrats and independence continue to vote for them

they don't care whether it's too expensive for you to survive

catch red I radio live every night on the red I radio app available in the app store

“red I radio and he is our company and I'm hearing that america is a morning off”

by the way download our right-eye radio app today and you can listen when and where you choose you we had played that audio cut from that young political activist with Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings was saying why you democrats against high gasoline prices you've always been for them

when when we were never for high gasoline prices they had that young kid on uh from one of the leftist mightest touch group uh and I've said that's calculated let's bring on young people who can claim complete total ignorance as a part of their a part of their debate points well we're we're the older folks here

“yes we're the older folk and hold it let me get up here from my chair oh my knees and my ankles”

yes we're the older folks here but our minds are working fine and we have long memories and we know that high gasoline prices and specifically when you look at

New York and Kathleen vocals problem right now high electricity prices that has always been

the goal of democrats over the last 40 years they have wanted to skyrocket electricity prices and skyrocket gasoline prices so you would buy alternative forms of transportation and energy that is more expensive all the subsidies for solar and wind and electric vehicles was to bring down the cost of that alternative energy by having someone else pay for it

it was never cheaper now how do we know that it's always been the goal over the last 40 years

of the democratic party to skyrocket electricity and gasoline prices how do we know it they said it let us go back second time I've played it this week and you know I'm playing it I got a ton of response got ton of response from our listeners going whoa I never heard that and we should play it all the time now we should play it constantly we should even have it as our as our Kathy vocal update because Obama said this in February of 2008 here we go you're ready just to make our point

and this is not AI because Eric and I played this two thousand eight two thousand nine two thousand ten two thousand eleven two thousand twelve two thousand thirteen it's probably it's probably one of the most often played audio cuts of the first ten years of our show and maybe we should make it again just so you know all of this is calculated then when Kathy Hockel talks about the fact of lowering electricity prices that we're killing people and we have to at least temporarily

suspend or slow down the increase of cost what she is saying is something that I was for and all Democrats were for and voted for over and over and over again over the last 20 to 30 years was calculated it wasn't corporations it wasn't Republicans it was Democrats whose goal

“and only motivation was to skyrocket the cost of what you have to pay for energy”

here is more of our proof under my plan of a cap and trade system electricity rates wouldn't necessarily skyrocket there you go any more Democrats any more in case you for

yes that has been the goal of Democrats for years and we'll play it more

“as governor Hockel in New York it's going oh somebody she was actually saying is”

you've got to help me you've got to help me help me help she sounded like newman when newman on sign boat will help me help me help me she was saying it like we should talking to citizens help me help me what do you mean this is something it's what you and the Democrats created you wanted higher electricity prices help me help me help me from myself

that's like I said stupidity ignorance and help me from my own actions has become the

Democrat campaign narrative for 2026 and it might work meanwhile in other areas here social security is facing the threat of insolvency in less than a decade and a new proposal would cap the amount of social security benefits that a couple could receive each year at $100,000 the age in America's population is draining the balance of social security's main trust fund which is projected to be depleted by 2032 funds for social security benefits are drawn from the

trust fund along with payroll taxes and they would be automatically cut by law at the time of

insolvency to match incoming revenue reducing benefits by an estimated 24% across the board

“that's why when the president said we will change nothing of social security”

in a state of the union address this year we just said well Republicans have given up on undoing it to because there will be a change in social security it's going to be a change no choice if you get to that point they got to cut benefits 24% so you've got to find the money somewhere or you got to cut benefits one or the other and not taking it serious not looking at the reality of the economics of the sole of social security is one of the most irresponsible thing

Democrats have done for years and now Republicans have joined on top of it the nonpartisan committee for a responsible federal budget launched a trust fund solution and if initiative to explore options for improving social security salvincy with one such proposal capping six figure benefits to the wealthiest couples by the way they may not be wealthy because you can make a lot of money and not still have a bank account

the six figure limit proposal would put in place a one hundred thousand dollar cap on the total benefit a couple retiring at normal retirement age can receive all right that would be at sixty five the the maximum benefit right now that you can receive as a

“single person is I think three thousand four hundred and sixty seven dollars”

and that is if you if you get that when you're sixty five seventy you get more but this would be at sixty five that it would place a one hundred thousand dollar cap on the total benefit of a couple retiring at normal retirement age with adjustments based on marital status and claiming age for single retirees the limit on social security benefits would be fifty thousand dollars okay

now when I when I said the amount you can make right now is thirty four three thirty four sixty seven I think it is that would be for single person I'll look up to see what it is for a couple so single retirees a limit would be fifty thousand they noted that while only a small fraction of retirees receive one hundred thousand dollars in social security benefits as a couple or fifty thousand dollars in individual

changes that would mean for example as you get more each year the inflation adjustment

“the again it would cap the social security benefits such that no couples collecting benefits”

at their normal retirement age again that sixty five is normal sixty two is early seventy is late

and you know you make a third more if you wait till seventy

it would adjust the limit based on marital status and at age at which they begin receiving benefits a couple who delayed collecting benefits as long as possible until age seventy would have a one hundred and twenty four thousand dollar limit whereas a couple who started collecting benefits as early as age sixty two would have a seventy thousand dollar annual limit. I'll have to look at what it is for what it would be for singles

at that age I'm looking here the the group worked with the open research group

“to model a trio of options including a one hundred thousand dollar limit index to inflation”

a limit froze at one hundred thousand for twenty years and then indexed to average weight growth and a limit frozen at a hundred and a hundred thousand dollars then indexed to average wage growth after thirty years it found that the inflation indexed

so security would save a hundred billion dollars over ten years

while closing twenty percent of so security seventy five year shortfall and fifty five percent of the shortfall in the seventy fifth year. Both the twenty and thirty year fixed limit would before indexing would save one hundred billion over ten years and while the twenty year proposal would close twenty five percent of the shortfall the thirty year option would close fifty five percent of the seventy five year shortfall

and sixty percent of the shortfall in the seventy fifth year so they're projecting way out

seventy five years so you're talking about the fact that the majority of the middle class

would take a huge hit you know twenty five years from now because twenty five or thirty years from now or fifty years from now if you didn't index for an inflation fifty thousand dollars for a single person is not going to be a lot of so security money it's going to you know and so that's the entire point now is this a possibility of something congress would do yeah

because what you want to do is you want to be out of office by the time that people actually you know see the change in sole security the majority would not this this would be projected way out we are right i radio when it comes to supplements there are two things that matter the most it works and you can trust it many hosts on the radio have been endorsing relief factor for over decade that's over ten years of lending their voice to help get you out of pain naturally

why because it works plain and simple before taking relief factor i suffered with aches and pains from years of running and of course aging every day i was in pain no longer with relief factor

“i love it i take it every day you should too you know they offer a quick start option”

even though they lose money on it so people can try it for themselves and you can see how life changing it can be let's get you started try relief factor three week quick start just 1995 visit relief factor dot com recall eight hundred the number four relief that's relief factor dot com or call eight hundred four relief use red eye the drop-down for your three week quick start at just nineteen ninety five coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric harley it's red eye radio

[music] we are when i bring you and he is a crony and i'm Gary McNamara aircasso morning off all right so i did some figures here and sorry i messed up because uh i was checking the normal retirement age at 65 see that's proves i'm old because it's 67 and a single person retiring the maximum they could

that would be what sixty thousand yeah uh and it would hit at fifty thousand

well and the top for couples is a hundred thousand so right now so it would affect very few

“people to start out because most people don't make the maximum cell you need to make that uh”

you know to make that amount but as a years go by and this is that so security plan that's out there

that if you don't index it to inflation it would encompass thirty percent of the the the people

“let me see thirty percent of the people by twenty sixty would be affected by this is rid eye radio”

on westward one but what I still want to say is not the kemp of the transition to the

semester by tag leapt or bücher soft handy internet as a master's real toy ah say you can

“I can't say you're a real cool guy you're a steuer but you don't have to do it. egal”

it's a loss for a track. make the whole thing like that and when they then work, it's a chain that's right. safe like that. hold it your money now. now try to get out of here again. out of the recruiting spirale. with stepstown all jobs become like all other times for a year in a package to a fixed price so let's see if it's a 50% cost test and they're every time flexible. now let's take a look at stepstown.de/alljobs stepstown

easy to find the real talent for all jobs