04-07-26 Part One - Pakistan's Art of the Deal

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio.

All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara, good morning. [MUSIC] Well, yesterday when I was reading a deal has been presented. I'm like, oh, really a deal?

So, both sides have presented a deal. No, Pakistan has negotiated a deal with themselves that Iran and the United States has not agreed to, like, well, I don't know what else to say. Well, the Red Eye guys have come up with what would be a good deal. And so a deal is on the table.

Yeah, no it's not. It's Eric and Gary went to their parent company and a deal is on the table

for $10 million per show each.

[LAUGH] Well, who wrote it?

“Eric and Gary, you're exactly the company had any input at all?”

No, but the deal is on the table. The deal is on the table. I think one of the best portions of an article, I mean, he goes after Trump for he believes not explaining the situation in Iran. I think that he did the first date minutes.

I will say this and I think if your older were all, and I won't say guilty, but you and I were having this discussion, I go back clearly in my mind almost a half a century on Iran.

Yeah, I always go back to the day I was standing at the front gate of Laflan Air Force Base

and the Iranian pilots were being sent home. I mean, that was kind of, because it was, I witnessed it right there. I watched those buses go by. But over the years, over that almost half century, 45 years, 46, 47. Maybe we were in heaven problems before that though.

And so you look at that, and you and I could sit here and say, and then this happened.

“And for example, I don't think that the majority of Americans know, and I think it was between”

23 and 24, that Iran attacked 150, you know, basically US interest and/or basis, whatever, US targets. Right. The majority of Americans don't know that. Right.

And when you, when you look back and when you understand the the Sharia supremacy law in Iran, you understand, there's really no room for any type of negotiating. It's word dead or their dead, and it's, and we tend to, and I think this is a point that Andrew McCarthy brings up here, that we tend to look at everybody as if they have our own kind of Western thinking and any, any points it out, he said, Iran's regime, I'm going to,

“I'm going to jump through some different paragraphs here that I think are really important.”

Iran's regime is led by Sharia's supremist. The IRGCs indoctrination in and commitment to this rapidly anti-American anti-Western ideology is profound while the regime also hates Israel more specifically Jews, as well for their doctrine

and their geopolitical reasons, its principle enemy is and always has been the United States.

If the regime were to acquire nuclear weapons, it would also continue developing ballistic missile capabilities to increase threats against American interest in the Gulf region and beyond, especially our homeland, that is a fact. Even if given more opportunities to do so, the regime would not evolve out of its position because of trade or the possibility of economic prosperity. Like its anti-American access partners, China and Russia, it would exploit any

improved financial position to become a more formidable enemy. It would continue doing

biobama and Biden. It would remain the world's leading state sponsor of anti-American

“jihadist terrorism. It would continue its ballistic missile development and manufacturing programs”

and it would seek the game changer of nuclear weaponry all to leverage against the United States.

This is not speculation. We know it from the regime's nearly half-century record. We should stop speaking of civilian infrastructure because it deludes us. Civilian is a western concept based on the western understanding of the individual's relation to the state. The individuals array of civil rights that states are formed to promote and safeguard. In a Sharia supremac state such as Iran, there are no citizens, no constituents of the state's

“government as we understand those terms. There are subjects and there are rulers.”

The rulers obligation is to adhere to and enforce Sharia Islam's law and societal framework

as construed from the fundamentalist perspective essentially set a millennium ago. The subject's obligation is to obey. The subject does not have civil rights as understood in the West. That is why in the 1990 Cairo statement, Muslim majority countries attacked the Declaration of Human Rights in Islam. Their reasoning was at the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights which western progressive, progressive described as universal, is incompatible

“with Islam's tenant that human beings only have the rights and duties set forth in Muslim”

Scripture which is the basis of Sharia. Islamic law rejects the principles of liberty, self-determination

and equality under the law. It is systematically discriminatory in favor of Muslim men. When we speak of civilian infrastructure in the context of Iran, as if we were speaking of it in the context of Western Republican democracy, we are speaking nonsense. In Sharia's supremacist ideology, the highest duty is to wage jihad against Allah's enemies specifically those who do not accept Sharia and especially anyone who thwarts its aspiration

to dominate. What is underappreciated is that non-combatant deaths are also encouraged to begin with non-combatant deaths at the hands of the regime, ensure that the regime and therefore its imposition of Islamic law will endure. That is why the regime recently killed up to 40,000 Iranian dissenters who tried to rise up against it just as it has killed imprisoned and tortured under in some thousands of Iranians over the last century. Just as we must view the Iranian Sharia

state, as conceptually different from a Western state, we must also alter our understanding of Iranian infrastructure. In Iran established in 1979 under the Khmeini Sharia system, and now ruled by the IRGC, created by that system, infrastructure belongs to the rulers. There is not a diversified Western economy in which there is a robust private sector that has erected most of the infrastructure for the benefit of its citizens. In Iran, the infrastructure

is controlled by the rulers and benefits them. The IRGC gets most of the energy revenue and controls about 2/3 of the GDP. The regime, like the Hamas, Jihadist organization, is trained armed and back financially uses infrastructure that is, quote, civilian to conceal forces and armaments. The infrastructure very much including the energy terminals, the electrical grids, and the bridges, and other transportation facilities is thus the IRGC's sustenance.

I am a lawyer. This is Andrew McCarthy. I am an a lawyer with some national security expertise.

I do not intend to be a military expert and intelligent analyst or well-versed in Iranian infrastructure. I am not in a position to assess the military value of targets that the Trump administration and US military commanders have in mind. I am unable to say whether hitting this or that target would cause a quantum of non-combat and death and destruction that cannot be justified by the military value of the strike. But what I can say that what we in the West

are so diluted as to call civil infrastructure, the destruction of which would harm Iranian civilians, is in reality the lifeline of the totalitarian, Sharia, Supremist regime that enslaves and killed Iranians while waging ceaseless, jihad against the United States.

Well, it's well laid out there about what the reality is here.

“And it goes to the point, I think, in a very basic fundamental way that we have made and that is,”

there is no negotiating with Iran. There's no negotiating with any part of the regime that is left. I don't know what the ultimate mission is. I tend to believe that there is a great possibility that we're looking at attack attack, let the decetal knock-on doors and find out whose left. When the head of the IRGC intel was killed recently, the idea put out the statement that he

was killed that Iran put out their own statement that he was killed. But this goes back to Soleimani.

And it's interesting because yesterday the president brought up Soleimani and what they believed his plans were on future attacks. And the fact that if Soleimani had still been around, that this would be a very different war against Soleimani. So, I tend to believe what they're doing is they're going through these missions. He said that sets of missions and taking out targets and then reassessing based on the success of those missions of where they are and who was left.

I don't believe there is a real conversation or a goal with anyone at this point who was left from the regime because they just simply cannot be trusted. You could say, they could say, "No, no, no, we're going to convert. We're going to do this. We're going to do this."

“This makes it so much more complicated than anything I think the United States has taken”

on maybe since World War II because of the nature of it and rooting out every single person, entity, group that is loyal to the regime. They absolutely must be taken out because there is no way to negotiate with them. It is us or them and it's been that way. This has been 50 years in the making and there's no way to turn that around. You were not as Andrew McCarthy points out here. You're not going to overturn the culture of that society, of that regime.

They will not have that. By the way, you know, he mentions China and Russia and there was no doubt in my mind that China and Russia are still assisting Iran to some degree. I just I know that

“they are, there was early intel that came back that said they were, I believe they still are”

and that's a problem. But the good news is we have other Middle Eastern nations that are on our side here that want this thing done and they want the regime gone. Well, one of the things is reading this yesterday is his cutter provides a tremendous amount of oil to China. It's not getting to China because straight support moves is because of the situation there. Right.

our enemies want this thing done and over. They don't wish to extend it because they get a tremendous amount of oil from the Middle East. Right. And so they want it straight out. But what I see is

“originally when they went in, I think that the infrastructure, because the, the CIA,”

and I think Trump, if the CIA understands it, sort of Trump, that the goal was to see if you can

because it hadn't had never been tried before to this extent, get rid of everybody in the first

level of government, whoever replaces them, get rid of them, whoever does that, get rid of them. If they don't unconditionally surrender, then we have to hit the infrastructure. We have to destroy the economy completely where they can't, the, I saw a great point made if we hit all the infrastructure. It means less civilians will be executed by the IRGC. Yes. Because they're not going to have power. Right. They're not going to have the ability to move. Right.

And that you're, it's a point that they didn't want to get to. But if you want the people

“to actually, you know, get out there and, and, you know, revolt, yeah, you have to take down everything.”

You've got to take everything that is related to the power structure and Andrew McCarthy makes a great point. We're not really taking out civilian infrastructure. Right. We're taking out what keeps them, the, the, the, the regime and power, the regime and existence. Yes. Yep. That you almost have to destroy the country completely. Well, because the revenue stream is top heavy. They, it's, it looked, the economy for, you know, if we, you know, he wrote that it, he wrote

that in the IRGC controls two thirds of the GDP exactly. So you're, you're taking out the regime when you take out that infrastructure. We are right. I radio brought to you by hot shot secret.

Hi. I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller. Drivers must always be prepared

for a roadside inspection. This means drivers should always have their personal vehicle and company credentials organized and ready. The top two violations written against drivers every year, are log general form and manner and log not current. Both are completely avoidable if the driver keeps the log accurate, compliant, and current at all times. Having the vehicle ready for inspection involves the driver conducting daily inspections and making sure any problems that are discovered

are immediately corrected. Vehicle readiness also requires the company to make sure that the vehicle is current on all scheduled maintenance and that the maintenance schedule is adequate. This will make sure the driver is being given a sound vehicle to start with. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. , I just don't think that the majority of Americans even understand not

even after 9/11. I don't think they understand the concept of Sharia supremacy that you see in Iran and many other Islamic countries. I really don't think they really understand because you're hearing it. It's war crime. We're hitting any Democrat that says that is either lying or truly is just too young to understand the situation and if you want any evidence of that, look at New York City. I'll put the day for God. Yeah, who they elected. Yep.

Hey there. I'm Paula Pan. I help people make the smartest money decisions possible. Do not ever worry about your salary. You need enough to make sure that you don't in a bad financial

“position. Once you have that, your salary becomes moot. What matters from that point forward?”

Upside games. Any type of ownership stake or ownership potential. That's the money. Remember, you can afford anything, just not everything. Afford anything. Follow and listen on your favorite

Red I radio live every night on the Red I radio app available in the app store. Red I radio.

We're Red I radio. He is there. I'm Gary McNamara. It's funny because we got on the air a little over 35 minutes ago. It's like, I haven't checked the news. It's like I haven't I haven't updated my mind because things change so quickly. You know, you think about it.

“You know, the Democrats were, you know, and this is, I think, more evidence of what we believe”

is going on with the president and his rhetoric. Democrats are going on. Hey, call them this name.

It's like you've called him a Nazi. Yeah. Right. To call the Iranian regime, what he called them,

you've called the president of the United States worse. But you and I believe we've said, no, and this goes, I forgot who said it yesterday. Somebody put out a thing yesterday and was according to interview the president did back in 2015 where he said, "I'm president, confusing enemy, confusing enemy, have no idea." And it's funny because I was reading, I think, I forgot where it was. Here, in the last hour, I was read so many articles.

But I run woman and said, "Actually, it was Wall Street Journal." And they said, "Nobody is any idea what the president's going to do." He's really, he's just, you know, it's all up to him. You really can't get a read because it's so tightly held, which is why he was so angry at the leak. Yeah. Yeah. Right. That's, you know, in that moment, when he talked about that leak,

“because you're talking about a critical moment. And I think they're going to, I think they'll find”

out probably to some kind of di-test where that leak came from and how that happened. But seeing that undermines the entire mission and it is a, it is a matter, he mentioned it. This is a matter of national security. Absolutely. Yep. And you're talking about, again, American citizens, fighters behind American lines. I mean, behind enemy lines. And when you've got that situation, wherever that leak is coming from, there is an agenda to undermine the safety of those pilots

of everybody involved in the mission to rescue the pilot, everybody involved in this effort. And from that, you can extrapolate every American. If you're going to do that, if you're going to leak that kind of information, then you're working with the enemy, period.

“That's a very serious, serious thing. Was it, uh, is it Simone Sanders? I think it was,”

I think I, I think I saw it was her yesterday saying this shows you how authoritarian he is. He wants to put people in jail for free speech. Yeah. Like, oh my god. Yeah, you're, you're, you're, you're not, you're not going to win, you're not going to win that one. No. But I, I think that when you saw the president, you know, in those comments in the media, of course, went nuts. And then the president came out today and said, Oh, no, they've been much more reasonable. But yeah,

the, it seems like the people were dealing with that much, but no, they're not. No, no. And I really think that one of the reasons, it may be a small one. I mean, I think there, there should be a supremacy I agree with with the Andrew McCarthy, you know, they'd rather die. Yeah. But when you, when you look at it, I think that they believe that because they, they know what's going on in the media in the United

States, whatever the regime left is, they know. And they see the media basically rooting against

the, the American media, rooting against the United States, questioning every move and not at all relating the horrors of what chariots supremacy and Iran and around the world is really like.

Right. And so I believe the Trump is playing into that.

“Yeah, I think so. I think hard of the strategy is we know they're going to pay attention to the”

media. Let's have the media confused and he controls the media anytime he opens his mouth. Oh, yeah, there. It's, it's, and then let them go at it. He can, he can throw out whatever he wants. Propaganda is required in any effective military action. It's required. If you're, if you're not engaged in propaganda, you're not doing it right. You see the reporter, I'm paraphrasing here. Is he yesterday saying, you think God would approve of what you're doing? Yeah, it's like,

oh, right. Yeah. Anybody, anybody has that to Obama? Right in Libya? Right. Right. It's like, wow, he kind of went on and made the point. Well, you know, look, I don't want the loss of life. I don't think God wants the loss of life. I don't want the loss of

“life. But he was making the ultimate point that he believes God is on our side. But it is one of”

those questions that you're right. They would never ask of any president on the left.

Well, watching a lot of, you know, again, the clips with Scott Jennings are not watching a lot of CNN, but with the clips with Scott Jennings, I really do believe that what you have is a young ignorant press. I mean, they, they are political activists. Right. But they're, there's so much they don't, no, they're young and they're ignorant and they don't know by the questions that they throw out, you can say, wow, they don't have a clue. Well, when they, when they live in the bubble of

today, they are trapped in the bubble of today, because your curiosity should not only take you forward as a journalist. If you, if you were going to be a journalist, we know they're not. Their activists, the activists doesn't have an curiosity. The activists is only trying to form a narrative and then go after what they consider the opposition. And that's not a ran. That's the president of the United States in this case. But if you're a true journalist, then

you would want the basis of the backstory, which is history. You want to know, you kind of want to become a, a makeshift expert on a ran. In this case, you would want to learn or, or know the basics of what Andrew McCarthy was pointing out in his article. You want to know so that you can then

“go from there and you would understand, I think there are a few reporters out there that have”

the will to find that. And that's being willfully ignorant. It's simply, I disagree with the Republican party and I hate Trump. Right. So whatever question, I'm not actually going to become educated on the history of the last half century of Sharia supremacy in Iran, I'm going to ignore Islamic radicalism. Yeah. I'm not going to look into, you know, why 9/11 happened. Right. I'm just going to ignore it and say, all religions and faith and everybody's in every society that

exists out there. All our morality is equal. Why? Because it sounds nice and it feels nice to say something like that. There you go. And I really don't think it goes deeper than that. No, no, I think I think that's it because the bubble of today, you want to be the rock star today. Every moment is

about creating your moment and putting basically the shine on you. You're trying to, this is,

this is what they have been doing for the longest time. They want to make a name for themselves. When you go back to what's his name from, from CNN that got kicked out of a Jimacosta. Well, Jimacosta, that wasn't getting kicked out of that room that day. That wasn't where it really began between him and Trump. It began when Trump became president elect Trump in 2016 and the Buzzfeed story on the dossier kicked in and then Jimacosta over at CNN basically launched

this crusade based on the bogus Buzzfeed story on the bogus dossier. And he was kicked out of a room then. And of course, the president was not in power yet. He was president elect. They were screaming free speech. He's technically not a government official. And he can kick you out of the room that wasn't a government. In fact, a government building at that point that they were in. And this, but this is what they want to do. They want to make a name for themselves or themselves.

on a fledgling network like CNN or wherever it's going to be, that's the attempt is to be the rock

star and have the goth your moment. But that's not journalism. That's activism. And I, it doesn't drive any kind of, again, there has to be curiosity with a real journalist. You want to get down to, you want to know the whole story. You want to treat it like it would be

“an investigation. You want to have a criminal investigative mind. That's what you want to have.”

You want to be just like law enforcement. Good law enforcement wants to know everything they possibly

can about the situation. And you're going to, and from that, by the way, you're going to find great story telling the truth and telling the story of the truth, whatever is going on. Then that's what earns you the respect over time. They don't care anything about that. They want to be the star today. They want to be the activist today. That's who they are.

“And I think you're right. I think they don't care to learn the facts. The history of what”

Iran has been for the last nearly 50 years. I was just reading this from Hugh Hewitt who wrote

on X. There is an enslaved people in Iran, which is true. 30 to 50,000 of whom were murdered in January by an Iranian regime, load by the Iranian people. Whatever protest decides, the president decides to do tomorrow, there isn't one media analyst in quotes, by the way, analyst. I would trust a judge any of the actions he orders to be a war crime. And that's true. No, I mean, and by, in my opinion, was it, uh, who was saying that it was a

Schiffer swallow. He's still up there screaming. The war is illegal in Iran. Yeah. No, it's not. No, it's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not. It's not.

It's illegal in any way, especially since Congress gave the approval. Right. So it's not only, but there's still screaming that then you heard the war crimes. It's not a war crime. No, it is.

“It is. And you know, it's interesting. Just like the activists and newsrooms, the activists, of course, on Capitol Hill, and that's what the left has become.”

Just a group of activists and they're going to try and make the moment, you know, they want their TikTok moment. They want their rise. They want their moment. They're, it's not about serving their constituents. In some ways, they believe they are because their constituents are just as radical as they are. So effectively or technically speaking, they might be serving that radical mind. But you're not serving the truth. And if you're a journalist outside of those on Capitol Hill, if you're a journalist, there aren't two sides to every story. That's a myth. There's one side. It's the truth.

I was reading the lead story in, well, well, folks, Iran urges young people to create human chains around power plants over Trump strike threats. Why. So, you know, they don't go into American media. Now, don't be surprised if they say you stand or the power plant or your dead, the exit to you. But that right there is the evidence. I'm looking at which says, okay, yeah, they're paying attention to the American media. And what you're dealing with is a young ignorant, completely, totally ignorant and leftist political activist media in this country. That's, that's where all the motivation comes from.

We are Red Eye Radio. One's open for your goals. 866-90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio. We're Red Eye Radio. He is a Crony and I'm Gary McNamara. That's why I actually, every time I see another, you know, possible deal, which isn't being brokered, it's, you know, maybe Pakistan or yesterday was when I saw from Pakistan coming up with then I, here's what we think would be a great deal. Well, you know, then, then they run up by the United States and Iran. And it, it sounds like, well, there's movement towards negotiations. Right. And they're really isn't. No, no, there isn't.

Here's the state side. I think the administration, I think Trump is very good at it at manipulating, saying a couple of things because anything he says is going to, is going to make the news.

“If he, if he posts on true social, it's all over the news. And, and I think that's part of the propaganda and it should be, keep him, keep the enemy guess it.”

We're going to bring this from Fox history warns us as for the mullas. Any type of ceasefire deal are never a bridge to peace. There are tactical survival mechanism designed to shield a nuclear break out. Yeah. That's it.

Now for the our news is brought to you by how products is that how products dot com this is Red Eye radio on Westwood one.

Now it's Red Eye radio Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the relief factor studios. This is Red Eye radio.

“All across America. We are Red Eye radio. He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome and good morning.”

All right. Interesting editorial in the Wall Street Journal. Yeah, because here we go. The difference between goals and reality.

All right. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins last summer said the Trump administration's goal was to create a 100% American farm workforce. Well, now the administration we brought this to you in the last couple of months by the way. Well, now the administration is quietly conceding that two few Americans want to work these growing jobs and that its policies risk driving up food prices all the figures we give you here come from Trump's Department of Labor. All right. And it is Trump's Department of Labor and the Trump administration that is saying nope, we need tons of foreign workers in order to have food prices that are reasonable.

The Trump Labor Department to its credit has taken steps to make it easier and less costly for farmers to hire seasonal guest workers on H2A visas last fall. The Department relaxed a Biden wage mandate that required farmers to pay guest workers an average of 1774 an hour and as much as $19.97 an hour in California in addition to providing housing and transportation. The United Farm Workers sued arguing that easing the wage mandates for guest workers will undercut pay and demand for American workers vice president JD advanced made a makes a similar argument in support of reducing legal immigration now we've told you before that Trump.

This is one of the things that so many people believed he was an isolation as we never did. And so many people believe the Trump wants a 100% American workforce he may want that but he has stated publicly that he believes that with the economy that he will create we will need a ton of foreign workers because the birth rate is not keeping up that Donald Trump said that.

“When Jim Acosta got kicked out in his first term that's what he was talking about.”

The Labor Department disagrees a Labor attorney told a federal judge last month at a hearing on the UFW lawsuit that there aren't enough Americans to take these jobs and making it more costly to hire foreign workers will not increase employment for Americans. They're near the near total cessation of the inflow of illegal aliens combined with the lack of an available legal workforce results to significant disruptions in production cost and threatening the stability of domestic food production and prices for US consumers, the Trump Department of Labor warned in its rule making last fall.

High-wage mandates have not resulted in meaningful increase in new entrants of US workers to temporary or seasonal agricultural jobs. Now, this is the last fiscal year which ended last October, which is what they looked at because those rules and regulations were in place at that point to keep the wages high.

Farmers, farmers advertised for four hundred and fifteen thousand jobs in the last fiscal year which ended last October first.

“Four hundred and fifteen thousand jobs were advertised. How many American workers applied for four hundred and fifteen thousand jobs according to Trump?”

One hundred and eighty-two. Not a hundred and eighty-two thousand. Yeah, when we were going then, you said hundred and ten thousand.

No, I was making clear that that's a hundred and eighty-two. Not a hundred and eighty-two thousand.

Farmers report that crops are wasting in fields because they can't find workers, department of labor warns and shortages are resulting in more food imports,

“which are becoming more expensive because of the tariffs.”

wholesale fresh vegetable prices have risen forty-eight percent in the last year according to the producer price index. And so there you go.

prices prices matter and reality matters and it's really interesting here because this is a agriculture department that just last year said the goal is one hundred percent American farmer workforce.

And now what they're saying is that's impossible. Yeah, can't do it. Yeah, this isn't the left, doesn't Democrats, this is Trump's. Yeah, this is the belief of Donald Trump, just so people know where it's coming from. That and that's also realization of prices is what that is, too. Yeah, sure, realization that that, you know, prices, you know, did you see the numbers yesterday of a Harriet and talking about the fact that the favorability rating of Republicans is four point greater than Democrats right now.

And it goes back to the insanity of the Democrats, you know, where they stand. And like I said, the one thing, the one thing that will, that has the potential, it's the only really one thing that has a potential of taking the Republicans out of power and that's prices. Let me get it here. Here we go. This is the latest polling. I'm assuming this is from CNN. Here's Harriet. Okay. All right, here we go. Look at this net favorability party ahead at this point mid-term years with the GOP president in 2018 Dems are up by 12 and 2006 on net favorability, which party like more Dems are hit by 18 Republicans are actually ahead on net favorability at this point by five points.

So, Democrats are just simply put running behind their previous benchmarks and they'd be running well ahead of them if they want to take back the United States Senate given that map. So, understand, 2006, you know, that mid-term, Democrats, 18 point lead, 2018 12 point lead, 2020, 2006 Republicans with the five point lead. The greatest hope for the Republicans to win the mid-terms is the Democrats. Because if you look at it, it doesn't make sense. When you see that the two things that Republicans ran on and the president ran on,

that immigration and the economy are the two worst things that the president and the Republicans pull on right now.

“It shows that as we get closer to the mid-term, at least right now, Republicans don't believe that the -- excuse me -- independence because that's what you're really dealing with.”

Since don't believe that Republicans can do a better job. And it really mirrors what I -- you know, think I'm -- you know, even though, you know, with the -- the prices, it's not going to change me because I know. You look at that poll that came out yesterday and the same thing with the poll from Spanberger and Virginia.

And it's because she has promoted the far left agenda. She lied -- well, she lied to a gullible Virginia -- to Virginia voters.

Well, and -- and what would it be that you would promise if you're a Democrat? You can point and say -- because they're using the words now -- Trump's economy, Trump's economy, Trump's economy.

“But what do you point to in terms of a promise of what you're going to do about prices? The only thing the Democrats want to do is spend more.”

They want to give people money, right, which, of course, is going to bring back record inflation likely, depending on how far they were able to get away with it. Now, if they don't control the Senate, it's going to go nowhere. But if you're making the political promise, though, that you can fix pricing, Democrats can't make that promise. The only thing they can do is say, Trump's economy, Trump's economy, and then shut up. Don't try and make a promise. Well, they -- they make the promise, and then they say, for example, they actually had made a promise just in the last couple of days.

Bernie Sanders and other Democrats are coming out as we talked about yesterday.

“Governor Hokell is saying, "My God, we can't increase prices. Even the New York City Council is saying that you got Democrats, Bernie Sanders saying,”

"Gas prices are too high. The oil companies are ripping us off. They're not." California did the own -- well, CBS did another study on his price-gouging going on. Of course it isn't. And what they found out, the reason cost are going up is because of government policy. And so what you've got, you know, the Democrats on one hand are screaming, we need to make things more affordable for you. So we're going to tax the oil companies, which means they're going to raise their prices even more, but the Democrats have got away with it for such a long time,

because they have such gullible voters that don't seem to be able to connect the dots that if you increase the cost of doing business on a company, it's going to be passed on to the consumer. Yeah, which effectively again is an promise that's a promise to do more of the same that got us here. It's the same thing that the blue states are doing. And it's a bizarre promise. Yeah, it is. And we're going to fix it by spending more money and taxing greater, which, of course, the taxes are passed on to you and the spending will result in greater inflation.

“Well, that's what happened to Spamberg. She got in there. Exactly. affordability will make things cheaper and day one.”

The Democrats are talking about a new tax here, a new tax here, a new tax here, a new tax here. And as we have said, one of the problems, you know, that California has and these blue states have is the reality that the long-term policy is not going to change. The realization now from people. And I think, if this is what's going on, there's a long-term realization that, yeah, I mean, not like the prices right now in Trump. But for God's sake, the Democrats get in power. They're going to skyrocket my taxes immediately.

And so that's why you see people moving from blue states.

I think that's the difference as we talked yesterday. I think there's finally a realization from people that the long-term plan of blue states and the democratic party is economic doom.

Well, and part of the evidence of that is that it used to be a Fox News talk radio story about the migration of people leaving California. It used to be something you would only hear basically on the right or in the right media. Well, now it's a mainstream story. When you look at the investigation done by CBS News about price gouging, you know, when you look at governor hopeful, screaming, we need our millionaires back just like Cuomo had to do. And that becomes a mainstream story, and that's where people become more aware of.

Yeah, you know what these policies aren't working. These blue states are dying. They're losing people. They're not gaining people for a reason.

And that's I think the difference. It used to be when it first started. It wasn't this it wasn't at this level.

And people are realizing at some point, the average person, if I'm living in this blue state at some point, I'm not going to be able to afford to stay. I'm going to have to move.

And on the social issues, Democrats are insane. You know, another story, another medical study out that you see, we'll get to this coming up that that the transitioning of transgenders creates more mental health problems. Yeah, as we said, you can tear it apart. I didn't see, I could have fun. I did see a Democrat yesterday.

“I think it was an investor talk about the fact that he's a here it is.”

As a Democrat, it's Jamie Metzy, who is we see one shared world founder, futurist has written a book, the A.I. 10 Commandments and author writes, as a Democrat, let me be clear.

Our party will all lose all legitimacy if we do not clearly reject the bigotry intolerance and the anti-Americanism of the far left.

So when we've talked about identity politics, we, we, I am dumbfounded how Republicans have not jumped on that and said identity, they call it me or us racist, they're the racist ones, they're the ones that have institutionalized identity politics. I judge people by groups. We all know it. Yep. They judge people by groups. That's racism. Americans understand that. And here's a Democrat saying, and there's an, I've read a number of his posts where he's just blasting Democrats. I'm a Democrat. We got to stop this. Why that's who the Democratic party is.

“That's who they are. That was her goal. They're right. They didn't just, they didn't come upon this by accident. It wasn't a mistake. It's not that, oh, I didn't see that car coming because the sun was blocking me. They ran into the car.”

Yeah, right. It was calculated.

And so, yeah, so that's a little bit of hope. May not save them in the house, but could save the Senate. And if it does that, then we're, we're still in the stalemate for, you know, the next two years and it's promoting again, the sanity of, of issues that Americans believe in while the Democrats promote their insanity. Right. And we read that article yesterday that was saying that the 2028, the axios, yeah, axios had it. That the 2028 Democratic candidates are trying to forget where they used to stand on the issues and they're trying to be more normal.

Who's going to buy it now? No, you can't undo it. You can't reverse it.

“Spamburger just did it. Right. Bamburger just. Right. Oh, she just, you know, where we, we need, you know, good Democrat leadership to get affordability. So she gets in there skyrocket tax.”

Well, mom, don't get this going up. You know, gets, gets elected in New York City. Yeah. They're moving in the opposite. They're not reversing. They're, they're moving forward. We are right, I radio. This morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested, trusted, guaranteed. Since 1920.

An Easter parade of sorts that held the day after Easter Sunday at the White House. And as president Donald Trump told it on, he had set the White House south lawn mud day. This is about eggs. Lots of them. Real eggs used for the annual White House Easter egg roll. This year's egg supply was provided courtesy of a North Carolina egg farm. Donated from the Brasswell family farms with agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins last week, both visiting the farm site

and welcoming the eggs and transport vehicle at USDA headquarters while on its way to the White House. The Brasswell farm not only raised and transported the eggs with partners, they also cooked and died the eggs used for the Easter egg roll. And of it, which it's beginning to originate back at 1878. I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senox fuels and loops. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carly. It's Red Eye Radio.

We're on our radio. We use our brilliant. I'm Gary McNamara.

which political consultants and posters say is just mind-boggling how quickly it's fallen.

“It's so bad. Plus, take away customs and airports from sanctuary cities.”

Oh, that on the way. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Ray Leap Factory Studio. And I'm Gary McNamara along with Eric Carly, Download our Red Eye Radio app today. And you can listen, when and where you choose some shocking poll numbers out of Virginia that coming up in a minute and a half.

There are two things that I look for when it comes to supplements. First of all, it's got to work.

“And I need to know I can trust it. That's really factor right there.”

It's working. I've been taking it for a while and I'm telling you, it works for me. I used to be, in fact, changing my lifestyle really because of aches and pains from aging and over activity over the years. And I would just slow, I was slowing down more and more. And now that's not the case. Thanks to relief factor. I want you to get the same benefits from relief factor.

“You know, Dr. Nixon who created relief factor.”

You actually became a doctor after coming home from Vietnam wound. He wanted to help others heal. So we studied medicine became a doctor developed relief factor. To help us own patients with pain without drugs.

It's drug free and now you can get relief factor too. I want you to get the same benefits. I get from relief factor. Here's what you do.

Travelling factors three week quick start. It's just 1995 visit relief factor dot com called 800 the number four relief relief factor dot com or 800 four relief use red eye at the drop down for your three week quick start at 1995. So here's some of the the polling numbers. This was ABC seven out of Virginia Virginia governor. Spamberger's approval ratings tanks in new George Mason University Washington Post poll. Her approval rating stands at 47% with 46% of voters disapproving and 7% expressing no opinion.

The Washington Post reported on Monday the poll again conducted by the Washington Post in George Mason University's school of policy and government. March 26 through the 31st. It's almost going back two weeks it started. The new poll show Spamberger support has dropped by double digits. Quote a drop of that margin is stunning and should be greatly disturbing to the governor and the governor's staff. If it's repeated in other surveys said political scientists Larry Sabato told seven news in Virginia. She won by a 15 point margin.

The approval mark for Spamberger's 13 percentage points lower than the average for Virginia governors in the post polling since the 1990s. Her near even split between approval and disapproval is a worse net approval rating than the early term scores of her predecessors in previous post polls. A new poll also shows more voters think Spamberger's policies will make Virginia less affordable 41% saying less affordable more affordable 31% 23% says will make no difference. So there you go, but that's huge. Yeah, it's huge because ran on affordability. Yes, and you're not talking about a year period. No, you're talking two months.

Just a little over two months because it was taken at the end of March. Well, you know, it kind of reminds me of ahead of the mayor election in New York City, the group of individuals who said, oh, no, I'm going to vote for Mondani, but I don't believe that is policies will work. And it was. Huh, and I haven't seen any numbers come back from approval ratings yet for Mondani, and I would like to see it from that specific group, by the way, I don't know how you get that done.

Because the Democrats have proven time and time again, when it comes to the economy, there are only things, there are only two things they know how to do tax and spend, punish punish punish and that and and taxing is punishing, but it's not punishing corporations, it's punishing you the corporations pass that increase on to the consumer to the point that the market will bear. I mean, you take that on and then beyond that, they create efficiencies within their organization within their corporation by laying people off and relying more and more on automation and this is a negative for the economy every time and then when you get into the spending part, we know what happens.

“We have a record in place for a generation and recent years and that's those are the two things they want you to believe Mondani the same thing he wants he wanted you to believe.”

You could provide for everybody that the city of New York could provide all this free stuff, the government own grocery stores, the free bus rides, all of it they're going to give you everything you need because that's what communist gives you that's when the communist leadership only what you need and those are the things that we appointed out over and over and over again. But yet they win elections well they I look at it and it's like what's going on in this country Republican should be winning every election 70 to 30 I don't care what state is you know you but what you have it's it's sort of like every day.

“For the Democrats now in 2026 is a no kings rally nothing makes sense right you're like but we don't have any kings but he wants to be one.”

How do you prove that because he puts you executive orders as did Biden as did Obama as did every single president well but it's but the whole concept is bogus but when you don't there's a difference if you're a conservative if you listen to this show. We promote conservative and libertarian policies we have to connect the dots we would have been unemployed decades ago if we didn't connect the dots right we've got to connect the dots and explain why what we believe works.

“And the reality of of of of economics the reality of science the reality of physics the reality of of of of people predicting doomsday scenarios with climate change without the scientific evidence to back it up.”

We have to sit there constant every single day with Democrats don't need to do that they don't need to connect any of the dots for example we've been told for the think about this right now going on in different states. You've got span burgers decision to rejoin the regional greenhouse gas initiative which critics say would increase electricity prices hey you don't have to listen to the critics will take you back to Obama. Well waited just the other night why just the other night Obama said the whole goal with the climate change policies is to stay would necessarily skyrocket electricity prices yeah this isn't an accident it's not a mistake it's not like oh we just didn't know this it was calculated right it's all calculated skyrocket your electricity prices Obama the genius the deity.

All man in the room deal the all knowing deity man the other smartest man in the room who hovers over everybody else my god you Democrats want to just keep pilot it higher and deeper you love the BS.

Yes, but there it is right there she she you know once to you know they're decision to rejoin the regional greenhouse gas initiative. As as locals going we got to get the hell out of this when electricity prices are skyrocketing right and so you've got this debate in there where it gets to a point where Democrats have to acknowledge reality but still span burger. Lips in this delusional ignorant world of but what I say we want to save the world and this is what we want to do because I'm I have I'm relating to you a elementary school argument that is basically on emotion and no fact whatsoever because I believe the people that vote for me are complete idiots.

That they eat it and they don't pass it on to you right the most successful lie Democrats have told year after year after year and the Democratic voter has sucked it up year after year after year after year after year they don't have they haven't they haven't you seen in places where they have to start making sense now.

You see it with hoicle by the way I never thought it would be hoicle that would say well look come on economics matters.

I mean I never thought it would be no I didn't either I thought I tried I thought Cuomo was probably the last one to go that far.

“And go hey come on we need the millionaires back and it remember early on when he said at some point I can't afford to be a Democrat you know because and then of course he had to go along with whatever the legislative body in New York state wanted.”

And any came but I never saw hoicle doing that never I wouldn't a place that pet and a million years but you know and you see California are they changing a little bit who knows CBS's reports just here with a call. The train to know where they call it the locals call it stoned their own stone edge. Yes, it's like you just see pillars sitting up there. Yeah, but you know they they talked about this is bait and switch they said it was going to cost this must they never did the research on it. No, it's all one of the Republican legislators saying is a bait and switch they told you one thing and it was complete BS and the public bought into it and you know it's just and and that's the same public.

Well, we can trust government what are you talking about you know they're not doing you're what what we see is politicians that do represent a certain demographic of the voting public.

Yeah, we're not we used to hear this all the time. Well, they're they're not doing the best for the American people why why aren't they working in our best interest they are. Your best interest if you're on the left are delusional. They're based on emotion they're not based on economic reality they're not based on science and 2020 Biden campaign on hey. Come back if Trump deported you come back we want you here we're opening the border basically and that's exactly what he did for four years. He was out there saying we can run the grid on solar and we.

“We remember he had an ad natural gas yeah after a body year of promoting and I think for a minute that he looks yeah was it. No, yeah, no, it's okay. We got it because you're going you're looking you're an idiot.”

Right everybody knows you can't run our grid on solar and win right everybody knows it stop saying it but he didn't have to stop saying it for a long time because his the loyal Democrats.

He believes are complete idiots that will believe the most delusional thing that is impossible to do. Well doesn't matter make it sound good well it shouldn't be impossible it's only impossible because we don't work hard enough. I mean they they give you there's this logic that we never have to connect the dots and when we can't connect the dots let's show out some morality that but we must because we must save the planet that I've got some higher morality. So if something is in is scientifically impossible we can still do it because I have a higher morality than you right and then they they enact policy that well if we see you watering your lawn or using more than a eighth of a cup of water to brush your teeth.

“We're going to come after you if you use it's I mean remember when they did the EV law that's 2035 EV mandate and it was within a couple of days.”

Newsom had to come out and say don't charge your EVs this afternoon because we won't have enough power on the grid. That you go purchase extra power on the grid to make it happen. Wow we are right I radio. Get in touch with what I radio toll free at eight six six might be right I.

Yeah so you know when when you look at those when you look at the span burgers numbers to begin with and then you look at the the polling that to see an unhat earlier that was showing that the favorability rating that it's plus five for Republicans and.

“And with the concern over prices that's mind boggling it shows you and and that's why I'm wondering are are we to that point.”

Where you can look at what the Republicans are doing to go okay it may not be all that I want and there are some negatives but the Democrats aren't in option anymore right because I've seen long term.

What they've done and what they plan on doing and I'm convinced they're not going to change. We might be at that point. [Music]

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood one. Vince Conez is redefining news talk on Vince Conez host of the Vince podcast.

I'm bringing you the truth beneath the headlines of all of the nation's top stories in depth interviews. We feature newsmaking interviews with the top guests on the whole planet and I'll ask the questions you only dream of other interviewers asking.

“And a front row seat to the most important conversations of the day.”

This is show with an obsessive focus on what's good for America.

And you are going to love Vince. The Vince show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. Hi I'm Joe Salcey.

“I host of the stacking vegetables podcast most economists agree small amount of inflation is actually good.”

2% is what you're going for. Do why is everybody freaking out? Oh because it's the fallout people don't track their budget. You have this slow slipping that happens every month. To all of a sudden you go man I don't have any money.

The reason is now two people go to a restaurant. The bill is 60 bucks for two. Two guys walking to a restaurant. They start screaming. 60 dollars.

Stacking Benjamin's. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.