04-22-26 Part One - SPLC Indictment

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics

“to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting”

your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. I'm Gary McNamara, Eric has the morning off. It's me and you and you caught me right in the middle of reading the indictment from the Department of Justice. And well, actually, the grand jury indictment, not the Department of Justice, not not a prosecutor indictment, but the grand jury indictment against

the Southern Poverty Law Center. And acting attorney general Todd Blanch said a federal indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center was not politically motivated during an appearance on Fox news. The Alabama-based civil rights group was federally indicted Tuesday on fraud charges and is accused of funneling millions of dollars to pay informants to infiltrate extremist groups like the Ku Klux Klan. We'll go through this specifics here in just a moment and

any questions that we have. And like we always have done in any investigation, we look

for what is being presented to us and what the, you know, what the, the, the facts are based on the law. No matter whether it was the original Russia collusion hoax, which was a hoax as we all know, or any accusation against a Republican. We've always done it the same way. What is the law? What is the indictment? What is the evidence being presented here?

“And that's how we, that's how we've always done it here on the show. And I think if you've”

been a long time listener, even a short time listener for the most part, you, you know that. So that indictment is free for everybody to read. And if the takeaway is that it's political, I mean, I think the opposite is true. Blanched old black's news. He described the Southern poverty law centers alleged conduct as extraordinarily egregious saying the

group paid 3 million to people associated with the United clans of America and other extremist

organizations from 2014 to 2023. The group faces charges, including wire fraud, false statements to a bank and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The Southern poverty, a bland said the Southern poverty law center, which uses litigation to fight white supremacy and

“dismantle extremist groups. Well, they've, they've changed over the years as we all know.”

Who was it? What were public into? They put on a hate group one time and they found they removed them. They were putting mainstream, you know, conservative groups on can't think it was. You know, that their mission has completely changed, just like the American Civil Liberty, Jr., it's completely different ballgame than what it was 30 years ago. But does they have the Southern poverty law center, which uses litigation to fight white supremacy

and dismantle extremist groups, performed counter to its mission blanch said the very entities that this group was ways in money to go against are the very entities that they were taking the money in and paying to these entities and these individuals associated with these groups to let me go back here. I've got so many windows open here. Looking at all this. Okay. What we have right now, the Southern poverty law center, indicted six counts

of wire fraud, four counts of false statements to a federally insured bank, one count of conspiracy to commit, to commit concealment money laundering. So that's the indictment. So far, that came from the grand jury. Blanc said claimed that the Southern poverty law center funded informants helped initiate the deadly Ku Klux Klan rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017. What we alleged in the indictment and what the grand jury found is that one of the

individuals that they paid was one of the folks who helped organize that terrible event, they were part of it. That's all in quotes, by the way. Blanc said the Southern poverty law center pushed back on the indictment, defending what its interim CEO Brian Fair described as prior use

There's no information that we had that suggests that the money that they were paying to these

“informants and these members of these organizations that then they turned around and shared what”

they learned with law enforcement, Blanc said in a video response to the indictment, the CEO, the Southern poverty law center said his civil rights group was targeted by the Trump administration and expressed false or expressed outrage over the false allegations from the Justice Department. The actions by the DOJ will not shake our resolve to fight for justice and ensure the promise of the civil rights movement becomes a reality for all. So again, six counts of wire fraud,

four counts of false statements to a federally insured bank, one count of conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering is what we have so far and did I, I had the, okay, there it is, okay, the indictment. I had the actual indictment here in front of me and I was just going through it a couple of times. I read it a couple of times. It's a 14 pages long and just to try to simplify it as much as possible, I'm not going to go through all of where the money went to because

it's not where the money went to because if you're, you can do whatever you want with your money. You know, you get it as a nonprofit. The fraud comes in. The fraud has to be specific

“and that's what we're going to look for in the indictment here, but between 2014 and 2023, the Southern”

Poverty Law Center secretly funneled more than 3 million in funds to, just see what is that

stand for? What do they call them? Field sources, they call them, all right? Between 2014 and 2023, the Southern Poverty Law Center secretly funneled more than 3 million to Southern Poverty Law Center funds to these field sources who were associated with various violent extremist groups. They paid the field sources in a clandestine manner doing so hid the fact that while this is from the indictment, while the SPLC received donation money under the auspices that the funds

would be used to dismantle violent extremist groups. The donation money was instead being used

“in part by the Southern Poverty Law Center to pay leaders and others within the same violent”

extremist groups. That money was then used for the benefit of the individuals, as well as the violent extremist groups. And they go through some examples of the field sources that were secretly paid from the Southern Poverty Law Center, include, but are not limited to the following field source 37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 United the right event in Charlottesville, Virginia and attended the event of the direction

of the Southern Poverty Law Center F-37. That's the field source. Made racist postings under the supervision of the Southern Poverty Law Center and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees between 2015 and 2023. The Southern Poverty Law Center paid this field source more than $270,000. Field source nine was affiliated with the Neil Nazi organization, the National Alliance, and served as a field source for the Southern Poverty Law Center for more

than 20 years. Field source nine's activities included fundraising for the National Alliance between

2014 and 2023. The Southern Poverty Law Center secretly paid this field source more than $1 million

in 2014. Field source nine entered the headquarters of a violent extremist group and stole 25 boxes of their documents at nine coordinated payment for the copying of the materials with a high-level Southern Poverty Law Center employee who had knowledge of documents have been stolen. The original stolen materials were returned to the violent extremist group in a second illegal entry by field source nine thereafter a high level Southern Poverty Law Center employer

utilized a documents in part as the basis for story published on their hate watch website and authored by the employee. Another source was blamed for the theft and was paid to approximately $6,000 by the Southern Poverty Law Center to falsely take responsibility for the theft.

in an article published on November 22, 2013 the Southern Poverty Law Center described the group as a

“millennial reboot of what was once a serious domestic threat in its prime the United Clans of”

America was responsible for among other things. The 16th Street Baptist bombing and Birmingham Alabama which resulted in the deaths of four little girls and they go on and on and on with the money that was paid. Now try to see the crime to secretly funnel donated money to these field sources, individuals at the Southern Poverty Law Center including a person who would become the chief financial officer and a person who would become the director of the intelligence project

among others opened a series of bank accounts at bank one in bank two in the name of various fictitious entities including not limited to the center investigative agency CIA Fox photography northwest technologies tech writers group rare books warehouse these fictitious entities were

never incorporated had no bona fide employees and conducted no actual business at the times

relevant to this indictment bank one in bank two were insured by the federal deposit insurance corporation which means that to me that I look at that and say okay that's their that's their go to call it a federal crime because it's a bank and that is insured by the FTIC. You see and then they go through counts one through six beginning in or about 2014 and continuing through at least August of 2023

in the middle district of Alabama the defendant devised an intended devised a scheme to defraud donors or and attempted to do so and to obtain money and property belonging to donors by materially false and fraudulent pretenses representations promises and omissions the objective of the scheme was to obtain money via donations through material false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for.

All right so and and so that that's basically the the overview audit you can go through each and

every each and every each and every a wire transfer that was made the the false statements that were you know to open up the the actual accounts

“and they go through point by point by point I think what you need to get to”

is what are the specifics what did those people what did those sources actually do because what the southern poverty law center is claiming is we were paying them to get information in order to dismantle those particular hate groups the question would be why would you need to create fictitious places to do that. Why would you set up even any type of electronic transfer?

I guess is a nonprofit you just can't take the cash and not have an accounted for and in this particular case as a I'm guessing as a nonprofit this would be a thing their taxes you know they're they're they're filing for that was her fraud on their tax statements so like I said I just this all hit me as soon as I woke up just a couple

of hours ago so still going through it and probably have more questions than anything else but if you have the actual fraud and the fraud was committed I don't know if it makes a difference of the fraud which would be the actual setting up of the accounts has anything to do with what the field sources actually did with that money again talking off the top of my head as I've just been going over this in the last 45 minutes or so.

What a day it was yesterday so much to talk about we are right I radio brought to you by hot shot secret.

“Hi I'm Jen Lumis a transport safety expert at JJ Keller when driving you need to manage the”

space around your vehicle so that there's enough space to allow you to adjust when traffic conditions

one second for each 10 feet of vehicle length at speeds below 40 miles per hour at greater speeds

add an additional second it's impossible to keep other drivers from tailgating you but there are some things you can do to make it safer such as increasing your following distance avoiding quick

“lane changes and slowing down. There are also several things you should do to ensure that there is plenty”

of space between the side of your vehicle and other vehicles. Don't hug the center line and avoid traveling alongside other vehicles in strong winds. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates visit us at JJ Keller.com. We are going to open for your goals. 866 90-red eye on red eye radio. Here when I radio he is here. I'm here in Macamer Aircast the morning off. All right let's get to

the acting attorney general Todd Blanch yesterday on the grand jury indictment against the southern poverty law center. And you're alleging that the southern poverty law center was paying the leaders of KKK and other routes to continue their operations is that I'm not alleging that the grand jury returned an indictment that says that. And so what the what the investigation found according to to the indictment that was returned today is that they were paying. So the southern

poverty law center is raising money asking folks to give them money to dismantle racism and over a very long period of time. They were using some of the money they raised from donors to pay

to they called them field you know basically to informants to for information for access to just

pay them for for certain to do certain things and so yes that's exactly what the indictment charges. And the question one of the questions would be what were those specific certain things I want to get to where he was on with Laura Ingram last night on Fox News and here's part of this back and forth. Now they say they're no longer using these informants in this way and that it was necessary because they had all sorts of threats against the organization fire behind my

“threats and other acts of reporting violence and that's why they had to use these informants into”

that you say well to that is say for one the indictment charges all the way through 2023. So I'm not I'm here to speak about what they're doing right now but that indictment charges long period of time through 2023 and second and more importantly there's no allegation or information in the indictment that suggests they shared that information with law enforcement they have communicated they said they did well they have communicated when they so chose with law enforcement over the years there's

no information that we have that suggests that the money that they were paying to these informants and these members of these organizations they then turned around and shared what they learned with law enforcement to the contrary are else we would have known from their own words that they had given this money to to these guys and we didn't know it. Now and if you look at the actual

amounts that went to one million dollars to the national alliance affiliate three hundred thousand

to the Aryan nations affiliate two hundred and okay it's at two hundred and seventy thousand to the unite the right a to a united the right member one hundred and forty thousand to the former national alliance chairman seventy three thousand dollars to former kkk members and nineteen thousand dollars to the American front president who they claim as a and felon is how it's listed here so we'll see where this all goes but it made me think of something that I saw yesterday on tv that coming up

hey there I'm polypan I help people make the smartest money decisions possible you not ever worry about your salary you need enough to make sure that you aren't in a bad financial

“position once you have that your salary becomes moot what matters from that point forward upside”

gains any type of ownership stake or ownership potential that's the money remember you can afford anything just not everything afford anything follow-and-listen on your favorite platform

and I'm Gary McNamara he's our curly he has the morning off

“download our red eye radio app today you can listen when you choose all right so I'm I'm thinking”

allowed here as I'm just to you know and I woke up is when I learned about the the grand jury indictment of the southern poverty law center so this is more thinking out loud as I review the indictment and things pop into into my head about what you're going to need I mean a grand jury indictment would be one thing what would you need for a what would you need for jury and

when I look at for example they have the six counts of wire fraud four counts of fall statements

to a federally insured bank one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering concealment and I'm like where's the money laundering and if you look at it the indictment talks about the

“fact that they set up fake entities that were not incorporated in order to transfer that money”

that did not that did not exist you know they weren't incorporated they weren't they weren't real organizations by doing that in itself and and this is what because what I what I haven't gotten

is you know from the acting attorney general is specifically because what they're saying is

they committed fraud against their donors they told their donors one thing and they did another thing and I'm looking at that saying is that morally what they did wrong because if you're making that thing they they told their donors one thing and they did another and the southern poverty law centers defense is no we were paying these people to get information about the hate groups and that was it I mean that was it you you didn't have any you know you didn't have anything else in

there it would be very tough to prove unless the sources said we were paid this money in order to do this specifically which was against what the donors wanted then you could say donor fraud now that may be the case but what I look at here is when you set up whatever the reason because the grand jury might not have heard and and I don't see it indictment specifically what the field sources we know what they would that would they were paid and how they were paid

and you can make the case if you're setting up false companies false organizations in order to move money through it that's the money laundering right there that's the conspiracy to commit money laundering you're setting up fake entities which would be false statements you're giving to the bank and then the transference of that actual money would be electronically through the banking system

would be the wire fraud what the purpose of it is whether the purpose you know if if the purpose was to not let the donors know what they were doing with the money that they were actually as we talked it before because this is the the the the the allegation the general umbrella allegation is they were using the money to help create fake hate crimes

“I think that would be accurate to say that's you overall”

moral wrong that was done how do you get there how do you get to that point legally and the legal part of it would be the specific electronic transfers to set up of the the the bank accounts and the setting up of organizations that don't exist in order to move money is where you get the money laundering irrespective of what the intent was whether it was morally good or bad or aligned with the donors or not it would still be money laundering and if you're setting up a fake

organization to move money that that's even to to me would be more evidence of of money laundering

in order to get information about what the groups were doing

to report to law and then report that to law enforcement that probably what your donors

“would want but why do you have to go through all of this why would you why would you do”

money laundering why would you set up fake companies why would you break the law in order to do this would be the question as to the motivation but I think it would come down to those actual field sources that they paid you know that would be that that to me is the slam dunk if they would come on say no they they paid us in order to rye things up that's why we got paid

that would be the slam dunk for that case because then you could have a clear intent that it was

to defraud because that's what they're saying they were defrauding the donors that was the goal the crime would be wire fraud false statements to a federally insured bank and money laundering

“now we'll see where this goes and what evidence they present in the future but I have to tell you”

the solve but I woke up I went wow because one of the things that I was going to bring up on the show tonight was if you ever watch daytime TV and if you're up late at night like I am if look on the TV and see what's on I don't know what it was it wasn't it was not a streaming channel it was over the year and I had just looked down the TV and was scanning through it and not really sure what channel it was it was one of the old shows from the 70s or the 80s whatever but as I went to it it was a

it was one of the long you know like two minute or three minute commercials that fills up an entire commercial break and it was for the ACLU and I'm watching it and the entire thing is about

“donating money what is it the 19 bucks a month they don't say it they say for immigrant rights”

immigrants right everyone's equal everyone has rights what they're doing is they're promoting illegal immigration they want you to send their money for illegal immigrants but they won't tell you that they won't say specifically what it's for and I thought it's really interesting when you talk about all right there you are this is this was over the air was an over the air channel and I started thinking about the age again I'm not saying the ACLU is doing what the Southern

poverty law center is accused of doing or what the indictment says there I'm just talking about the fact that on the left they really can't tell you what they're going what they're doing in anything I've seen the ACLU commercials out there trying to get people to give $19 a month and it's very generic we're for immigrant rights no we don't have a there is no problem with immigrants in this country that are here legally well there may be a few but

you understand my point that the challenge with the America is not right now people that came here legally do some of those people commit crimes have some of them come in and become citizens and still are not loyal to the United States and minority of them commit terrorist acts yes but you understand what I mean that's not the problem as we view it it's not that everybody's screaming we need to have legal immigrant rights that's not what it's about it's about illegal

immigrants it's about sanctuary cities and it's about open borders they can't say that so that's just one of the things the other thing is when they talk about women's rights really are they talking about women's rights but it comes to women's rights what's the biggest women's rights issue right now that the left supports it's men playing in women's sports it's men in women's locker rooms it's the intimidation of women

it is absolutely the perversion of title nine

and so that's the second thing that I see in the ACLU commercials and I'm like they're not being honest

then they go to voters rights

they're against voter ID that's what it's about there is no other voting right issue for the

“individual that's it that's what the left is focused on but they can't tell you the truth they can't”

tell you what they're really doing you meant we're the ACLU and we care about the rights of illegal immigrants and illegal immigrant criminals and we believe anybody should be able to enter the country and we believe that men should freely be able to show their genitals to women in the locker room and we believe that men should compete against women and we think that anybody should be able to vote and we should not have voter ID probably if the ACLU ran that add they're not going

to get as many donations as to pretending that they actually care about people's rights now I look at

that you may not be able to legally get that as being a fraudulent message but it's fraudulent by omission that they're actually not telling you the specifics of where that money actually goes they throw a general umbrella out that sends you in a different direction from what they actually mean and what they actually will spend the money out because we know where they've gone it's really funny because the story of Dershwitz Alan Dershwitz becoming a Republican

“remember how involved he was with the ACLU that really blew my mind this week if you would have”

ever told me because Alan Dershwitz was in the news the day that I became a talk show host host the first week of October in 1989 and he was viewed as an absolute far left liberal if you would have ever told me in 1989 when I became a radio talk show host Gary by the time you get into this business over three and a half decades from now Alan Dershwitz will become a

Republican yeah right stop doing drugs that's never going to happen and and here we are

so yeah so we'll see what the southern poverty law center then goes but when it comes to where we are right now with with the left they actually can't tell you what they really want to do

“they can't they can't they'll get they'll get Democrats to donate but they can't get”

independence which is why they won't tell you exactly what they're doing and the ACLU and their ads will not tell you specifically what the money is used for what issues specifically they're going to promote they do it in this general broad umbrella which sends a ton of people in the opposite direction as to what they actually are going to do and so you may get some people to donate money believing that the ACLU is going to do one thing when their intent is to use that money completely

differently but if you're not actually saying we're using the money for this and you're using something else how do you get them you can't we are right I radio I'm really choosy when it comes to supplements I want a couple of things out of them of course I want it to work I want to know that I can trust the product that is the case with relief factor and I've been taking it for a while and you've probably heard many of my friends on the radio endorsing relief factor for over a decade

there's a reason I love relief factor because we're in that I keep talking about it but as we get into spring and warmer months you get outside more and it used to be I kind of had to plan around my pain and thanks to relief factor I don't have to do that I don't feel that same pain I did from the wear and tear the aches and pains from not just doing chores but aging and everything that comes along with it I take relief factor every day I want you to get the same great benefits

we're talking about drug free option here in relief factor and there's a way for you to get started very quickly in fact it's relief factors three week quick start just 1995 visit relieffactor.com or call 800 the number four relief relief factor dot com or call 800 the number four relief use red eye at the drop down for your three week quick start at 1995 we'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently and Gary McNamara we are in our radio he's our

uh Dr. Ben Carson who they called an extremist and that was uh that was back in in in

2014 he was on it for a while they finally apologized to him in 2015 and said you're not an extremist

Dr. Ben Carson yes he was an extremist look they're a political partisan smear group

“at the minimum it's like the fact checkers remember the fact checkers”

out to the our news is brought you by how product is it how products dot com this is red eye radio on Westwood 1 now it's red eye radio Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day whether you're up late or you're just starting your day welcome to the show from the relief factor studios this is red eye radio all across America we are right I radio I'm Gary McNamara Eric has the morning off good morning

all right well a one sided ceasefire continues uh the president is saying yesterday since there's so many factions uh in in Iran right now that we're going to continue to ceasefire and and then see what happens inside the uh the the government one thing that we said yesterday we've said this before is the strongest negotiating point that the Iranians have is that they believe that the United States no matter who is president

will not go all the way to get rid of them and that's their strongest negotiating point right now and if you look at this president this president has been tougher on Iran than any president

“in my lifetime but the fact is will the job be finished is reading uh this is who was here”

Byron York Washington examiner uh excuse me the daily memo you know Washington examiner okay I got it right Trump's frustration in Iran's delaying tactics if anyone knows that President Donald Trump

for all his bluster can mean what he says it's Iranians Trump is a president it took out the powerful

Solemani commander of the Iran's force in January 2020 Trump is also the president who bombed Iran's nuclear sites in 2025 and the president who attacked Iran in February of 2022 so Iranians know that for all his talk Trump can also pull the trigger on the other hand Iranians read through social the media site where the president post statements about the war against Iran

“Iranian officials follow the news and Trump's frequent many interviews with journalists about”

the war and the impression anyone would get from reading Trump's thoughts is of a president eager to put the war behind him Trump seems so eager in fact that he can appear desperate to get it over with we talked about this the other day words uh you know when he said Iran wants this we went no they don't don't say that the speed with which Trump recently embraced what he portrayed

as a breakthrough in talks with Iran only to have the whole thing fall apart in short order

suggested a president who badly wants to declare the war over now Trump was fully aware that Iranians cannot be trusted and that there was no set in stone deal in place yet he heralded the seemingly good news in a way that made him look over eager when things collapsed in addition Trump has promised from the very moment the war began on February 28 that it would be a very short conflict this war will be over very soon he said on a number of occasions where way ahead of schedule

it won't be much longer he has set on others at one point Trump said of the war's duration we projected four to five weeks but we're substantially ahead of schedule the war now in its eighth week is still going on now that's nowhere near forever war as Trump supporters would call it but there is no doubt that Trump is unhappy that it is continuing past the time he predicted it would

could go on for a long time when energy secretary Chris Wright said the price of gas has likely peaked

“but predicted it might remain high above four dollars a gallon until next year”

Trump quickly said that right was totally wrong prices will go down as soon as this ends Trump said Iran hears all this of course on Tuesday morning Fox News reported from Israel quoting a senior regional intelligence source who suggested that Iran hopes to wait Trump out Iran sees this as a game of endurance Fox News reported characterizing what the

source said they believe that time is on their side and that ultimately the domestic pressure

when it comes to energy markets and the stock market who forced President Trump to make a deal that's in their favor of course what Iranian leaders whoever they are believe and what is

“fact could well be two different things that is not the reality the President and his counterparts”

in Israel have the ability to continue this operation for months if they need to to pressure the Iranian regime to open up the straight of Hormuz and give up their enriched uranium that is of course true United States fighting with the single ally Israel has done tremendous damage to Iran so far and could inflict far more if the war goes on the rational next step it would seem to any American would be for Iran to give up and come to an agreement with the U.S. but who says this war has to

end with what Americans would consider a rational decision a ran gets a say in that meanwhile the President vence frustration almost daily I'm winning a war by a lot he posted on true social this

week things are going well our military has been amazing and if you read the fake news

like the family New York Times the absolute horrendous and disgusting Wall Street Journal and now the almost defunct fortunately Wall Street Washington Post you would actually think we are losing the war. Trump is right that some of the coverage has been wildly out of balance and could get an uninformed reader the sense that the U.S. is losing still his problem is far bigger than the negative news coverage the President who took on Solemani who hit nuclear facilities

and who launched a devastating attack on Iran is ready for things to end right now unfortunately

is frequently expressed sense of frustration appears to have inspired Iran to drag things out

for as long as possible now I won't say that I won't go as far as as that as Byron York has said what we have said though it doesn't help to fight a war in public and be as we said yesterday and be up and down and up and down and up and down because Iran pays attention to what we say

“and as we've said the best leverage Iran has right now is their belief and I believe”

that the belief increased yesterday that the President does not have the will to finish the job because they've already gotten what they wanted and that is the delay the delay is what they wanted all the time now we'll see what happens just telling you what's going on right now the President may go in and you boom and this may be appeared whether like okay let's take out the next level of government as we said take out the next level take out the next level take out the next level

take out the next level that they've looked at the United States and they say doesn't matter who's in there and they pay attention to the polling they pay attention to what the Democrats are saying they pay attention the Democrats are cheering the Iran they pay attention to Senator Chris Murphy yesterday about the fall story that boats were getting through the state of Hormuz and he said awesome what I mean that that was sarcastic they pay attention to all that they know they believe

that half of the United States is on their side because the Democratic Party is and then they see what Trump is saying and giving the opinion that it's almost over it's almost over it's almost over and they're like we can wait this thing out so we will we we will see what what the

at the leadership with Israel will he do it because when they came out yesterday and said J.D. advances in going because we can't get anything from the Iranian government and then the President said we you know there's so many factions in there I don't know the it wheat as I've said so much of it is speculation as to what the administration knows what the CIA knows what is really intelligence knows and and so we don't know is there a chance of a coup is there a

chance of a civil war we know there are various factions in there we know it's seen well it seems that nobody is in charge if somebody says it's somebody in the negotiating team said something

“it doesn't mean anything and the one report yesterday came out I think it was Fox News”

that had that the one Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander is the one who was in charge of

all of it now and they know if any deals done they're done and so if you look at it from the IRGC point of view they're looking at this going we get a deal with the United States we're all dead anyway a deal we're dead or if we don't deal we're dead so why should we deal that could be the mindset going on there so yeah it'll be interesting I'll tell you this so I did see gasoline and one gas station it was still 375 but the one down the street was 339

here so and it looks like the stock market has basically priced everything in it did not drop

“as much as people were expecting when you know we went through this particular weekend and it”

doesn't seem at all that the stock market it's almost as if they priced everything in so we'll see what happens on on on on that front is there anything else that you wrote here no that's basically it from the Byron York column but it really mirrors a lot of what we have said

over the last couple of weeks and we always knew it could get to this particular situation

we said it day one we said it even before if the goal is regime change so much of its audio control what isn't out of your control right now is going after every level of government that comes in to replace the regime that's been killed before

“but the fact is the president at this moment will not do that”

and do they know something that we don't know do they believe that there's going to be a revolution that happens in the next week and they want that to go on I don't know or maybe not a revolution of coup inside of there are there actually moderates that exist anybody really but the CIA and probably the Mossad it's a guess for all of us we don't know you know they've got they've got as we know they have people on the ground in a ran

they've got moles in that government that are still left so they know a heck of a lot more but as of right now it's going to be really interesting to see where this all goes we are right I radio this morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested trusted guarantee since 1920 some areas of the nation will not experience a slow movie whether track this week or the following what a week later systems expected to break precipitation

USDA biologist Brad Ripie says first we will remain dry but seasonably dry in the southwest it doesn't include areas stretching from southern California to the southern high plains and from an agricultural standpoint one of the biggest concerns will be the lack of moisture across the southern Great Plains an area that has had a rather warm windy dry spring for the most part and really needs moisture for not just winter grains range land of pastures but

any recently planted summer crops as well. Meanwhile in the southern Atlantic region of the country critically dry there stretching from say Virginia southward and we will be seeing maybe a few

breakthrough showers as some of that moisture from the cold front moves eastward late in the week

over the weekend but not expecting any really meaningful drought relief in places like Virginia

This report brought to you by Senax fuels and loops. Get in touch with what I radio told

for you at 866. Mindy Red Eye. We are Red Eye Radio. I'm Gary MacMur. Eric has the morning off.

“You know, it's interesting when I saw yesterday. I think it was Senator Lawler who I'm like”

this with the president probably should do because it's actually true. He goes look. The president said military action for a few weeks and you know four to six weeks and that's where we are and now the the the president for the last couple of weeks has been in negotiations with them about the the uranium. And that's where we are right now. The other thing is too. What we what we don't know is exactly what the the situation is inside whatever regime is left and how effective

the blockades going to be. If you keep the blockade on for a couple of weeks and it has the effect to bring in them to the table and doing exactly what we do then the president can

“should can promote and say what I said happen happen. We fought for fought we we were military action”

them for five weeks. The blockade was on for four weeks. You know the military action ended at that time. We're now in the the ceasefire with the blockade and they have come to the table. That hasn't happened yet. But if that does happen the president at that point can claim victory I don't know if

you're going to get to that point. If you're asking if the revolutionary guard is empowered and they

believe they die one way or another there's not going to be any negotiations. And so that's where you are you know that's where you are right now. And but it's just you know when you've got who was it let me see if I can find the the the the the Federman cut up the other day because you know we've talked about you know the the Democrats seem to be outright you know sharing for a random win and it's the most mind boggling thing here it is this is a Federman on CNN here we go. A lot of people

in my party and a lot of people in the media has has turned Iran into the younger dog you know they're like Rudy and putting them up on their shoulders and sharing for Iran at this point it's absurd it's absurd you know I'm going to you know back you know the president I'm going to back our military and Israel through until that 60 days is triggered and then there's an opportunity to extend that by 30 days no matter how many times you're going to vote no no no why because that just has empowered and

emboldened Iran to continue for these things. Did you see where Pennsylvania Democrats are reluctant to support Federman for reelection according to a new report punch poll news spoke to several Pennsylvania congressional members on Monday about whether they'd be willing to endorse Federman for another term in 2028 despite the backlash he's been receiving for opposed in the Democratic party uh one a sense of how tenuous Senator John Federman's position is with Pennsylvania Democrats

not a single Pennsylvania House Democrat in the delegation will say Federman should run for reelection as a Democrat though the House members do not explicitly reject the idea of Federman running again they avoided answering whether they believe Federman should seek a second term as a Democrat often focusing instead on the 2026 midterm elections but they couldn't find one single Democrat

“would they talk to you to say yeah we like we like a a Federman but it's true I mean that's what's”

you're dealing with right now on top of all the other insanity you've got the Democrats you know Chris Murphy yesterday who was being sarcastic number one you were promoting something that was true that ships were getting through the you know the blockade and uh and then number two you said

awesome she's we live an amazing time she really do and coming up following the bottom of the

hour we'll get to some of these amazing times maybe not good times that we're in the Virginia vote

catch red eye radio live every night on the red eye radio app available in the app store

“red eye radio and i'm gerry macamera he's early he has a morning off you know i've just”

uh trying to find everything i i can about you know any new information on that uh uh grand jury indictment of the southern poverty law center and i was just reading here uh Paul Moro who's a Fox news contributor uh focuses on law enforcement legal and intel issues uh he uh wrote on x however the criminal case goes the s_p_l_c_ something poverty law center is done look for the treasury department to get involved here because uh the southern poverty law center takes donations

that they were allegedly passing on to their operatives uh southern poverty law center could be characterizes a money remitter that puts them in the hopper for crippling anti uh uh uh would call it uh the um uh anti money laundering finds and that's one of the charges against him is money laundering and that's a great that is a great point you know the one thing that i that i didn't bring up yet and we'll get to everything don't worry uh is that and i had compared what the southern

poverty law center and the ACLU what what they've become is like when we first got fact checkers

“remember that well the Washington Post fact checker they've gotten uh 20 p_n_okios”

remember that the fact checkers and then american i became the fact checkers of the fact checkers because the fact checkers were simply a way to be as the public we're gonna say we're fact we've got the fact checker it is a fact checker sort of disappear after a few years why because we realize fact checkers were simply when the mainstream media came up with the fact checkers they were simply political activists trying to legitimize spin through calling themselves fact checkers

and that's what you have now whether it's the american civil liberties union

“and i mentioned them because of the commercials that i've seen that they're running here”

which clearly do not tell the donor specifically what their money is going to support as i said earlier if you've seen these long ads if you watch any daytime tv you know we're protecting voting rights what does that mean here against voter ID say that say you're against voter ID and try to piece the whole reason they're running the commercials is to fundraise it's a whole nineteen dollars per month but then good tell them exactly what

you want to do don't put an umbrella over it that leads people in the opposite direction tell them what you actually plan to do you know we are we are we are protecting voting and and racial rights because that's the whole thing voter ID is is is racist the majority of minorities don't believe that and that's just one of the things there but the southern poverty loss under the same thing we had a history of going after people that were racist now now everybody on the left

is or the right is racist no matter what and this is why want to get back to what we have said before this is why this is the to me it's the it's like i'm walking it's like i'm in a dream it's actually like i'm in a dream you ever get those dreams where you can't get to what you want you see something that's so clear in a dream and that nobody is making sense at all

and you're saying what the hell's going on here i there has to me in my lifetime there is never

their misogyny and their sexism they're blunt about it everyone knows about identity politics well democrats talk about it yeah we need to get rid of the identity

politics we need to get rid of the identity politics we need to get rid of the identity politics they never do

but even when they say identity politics you they don't get to the actual meaning of what identity politics is it's they judge people by the group they're in they don't judge people as individuals and the evidence is overwhelming and i believe the modern movement started the real modern movement and i was a part of that modern movement of talk radio back in the late eighties and the early nineties when you had a number of where i saw it a number of black conservatives

start doing talk shows and they were called everything from uncle tom you name it every racial slur in the book was thrown at them. Tim Scott heard it it was the left saying

“you as a black person cannot have an individual mind you must agree that what how we do things is right”

if you differ then you are betraying your race it got to the point in 2020 with cops

Eric and i will never forget that symbolism of these two young white women screaming at a

black cop because he's a cop and saying he's betraying his race because he's a cop and then you heard it from the democrats if your black and a cop you're not black your blue it was just and so the identity politics and insist on that's why you that's why you had the anti-semitism the anti-semitism exists i mean it's a the natural progression

blacksmith think this way critical race theory was the the the the basis the society should be set up

in a particular way because all whites are culturally racist they don't even know it unconscious bias you don't even know that you're a racist so all society must be set up

“that cultural racism is close to i always took a genetic racism that if you're white you must be”

a racist if you're black you can't you can't think on your own you must be a part of the boring consensus that's a Star Trek reference i hope somebody got it whatever demographic you're in you must be a part of the boring collective so the racism of identity politics and this is what is is manning to Eric and i is that the republican still don't pound on this every day they should pound in it every it should be a major marketing thing the racist are the democrats they admit it

and then when it comes to the misogyny of the radical transgender movement or god sakes we talked about it again yesterday liberal feminism was killed because the man says so the man said women you're not good enough we're going to take over your sports there's no difference between

“i think about this feminism now has said there's no difference between men and women”

they're exactly the same sex so there should be no private places for women women should not be protected from the exposure of men's body to them in the locker room and if they don't like it destroy their lives and the democrats are blunt about it again

we'll come up with the name for something that sounds like we're for this but actually we're

“against it in our practice each and every day so whether it's now the american civil liberties union”

or whether it's now the southern poverty law center these are the places that protect you from racism no they enable the racism of the democratic party each and every day and they take normal religion normal thinking things that are 80 20 issues for example voter ID and they attempt to raise money the ACLU does to raise money on these things by throwing out the umbrella

we're for minority rights voting rights women's rights but they don't tell you exactly where that

money goes to promote what specific issues and when you get to those issues they're the 80 20

“against and that's what we're dealing with today and that's part of our frustration”

and I guess this you know goes to you know what happened in Virginia we'll see what the courts you know do on on it but look it was it was bound to happen we've seen that the lengths of democrats will go to you know you look at how the federal courts have looked at

illegal gerrymandering whatever that specifically is but certainly if you sit there and say that

45 to 50% of the electorate should be given 10% representation probably most courts would look at that now and in the past especially and say no that is the tyranny of their majority and that's the problem with the whole popular vote thing is the tyranny of the majority people say yeah you can look at Texas Texas probably Texas

“is at a better case where I think Texas might have failed and we'll see is the assumption that”

his the Hispanics have permanently moved to the Republican side that might have been their mistake but when you look at the population growth in the state of Texas which is not the same in Virginia you can actually justify that in a much better way than what Virginia is doing which is absolutely the tyranny of the majority but I think they know that long term they can't sell the American public on what they actually wish this country to become and we'll get into more of that

we are Red Eye Radio coming up more with gerrymandering america and ericardly it's Red Eye Radio Here when I read you he is here currently and I'm gerrymandering america welcome and good morning eric has the morning off by the way the whole thing that Texas started it actually New York started a few years ago with the redistricting so Texas didn't start it but this wrong they did look it was bound to happen and like I said you know both

both parties of course have you know redrawn districts in the past will see what the courts do on on Virginia but the advantage for Republicans if they can ever wake up is that on most of the issues they have landslide approval numbers and so we've talked about this many times before what has really hurt the Republicans this time around is the exact same thing that hurt Democrats the last time around and that's ignoring how people pay attention to prices you can talk about

everything else that you do if you don't get prices out of control and if you promise the people something as this administration did checks for this and checks for that and it doesn't come true we have a population of populist that are now in the Republican party and independence who want what is coming to them that's the reality of the pathology of dependency that the

you know Eric and I've always talked about word doomed that's part of it that's part of the

“cycle of doom when it's okay let's tax the corporation let's tax this we can get money from these”

people and you can get it here and it's all alone a horse manure and we buy into it every single time

and so you know it when it comes down to it I don't think there's a lot of future for the

Democratic Party long term worst possible scenario if the courts don't reverse in Virginia and they

“take the house is that it all depends on what Trump does over the next few years”

because not much will move if they get the house it'll be who can sell what the other party has

better for 28 this is riddy radio on westwood one hi I'm Joss all see hi host of the stacking bedroom's podcast most economists agree small amount of inflation is actually good 2% is what you're going for the wise everybody freaking out oh because it's the fallout people don't track their budget you have this slow slipping that happens every month

to all sudden you go man I don't have any money the reason is now two people go to a restaurant to the bill with sixty bucks for two two guys walking to a restaurant they start screaming that hilarious sixty dollars a stacking Benjamin's follow-in-listen on your favorite platform Vince Collenays is redefining news talk and Vince Collenays host of the Vince podcast I'm bringing you the truth beneath the headlines of all of the nation's top stories

in-depth interviews we feature newsmaking interviews with the top guests on the whole planet and I'll ask the questions you only dream of other interviewers asking and a front row

“see to the most important conversations of the day this is show with an obsessive focus on”

what's good for America you are going to love Vince the Vince show follow-in-listen on your favorite platform