Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

05-27-26 Part Two - Trump's Demands for Iran

1h ago38:025,471 words
0:000:00

In part two of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, President Trump’s demand that more Muslim-majority countries join the Abraham Accords and recognize Israel as part of efforts to end th...

Transcript

EN

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything ...

to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting

your day.

β€œWelcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.”

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is our Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome to Good Morning. Thank you for being here this morning.

Thank you. What was the other thing in the election? Oh, here it is.

Are the run-offs primaries, whatever you want to call him, it takes us yesterday.

Democrat, Marine, Galindo, the South Texas sex therapist, who drew national attention from Democratic Party leaders was defeated in her primary run-off yesterday. According to Associated Press, the seat newly drawn from Texas Republicans redistricting

β€œeffort is currently represented by a squad member, however the liberal senator is running”

in an adjacent district being vacated by Representative Lloyd Doget, leaving the now Red Leaning seat up for grabs, Galindo became an national flashpoint when she accused of anti-Semitism for floating a plan to imprison American Zionist at an ICE detention center. She's a nutcase, wow. So she did not win.

Meanwhile, what's going on with Iran?

What is going on with Iran?

This is Trump's last post about it at 232, otherwise he really didn't mention it. Much of the day at all. You ready? All right. And for social.

If Iran surrenders, admits their Navy is gone and resting at the bottom of the sea, and their air force is no longer with us, and if their entire military walks out of Iran weapons dropped and hands held high, each shouting I surrender I surrender while wildly waving the representative white flag, and if their entire remaining leadership signs all in the necessary documents of surrender and admits their defeat to the great power and

force of the magnificent USA, the failing New York Times, the China Street Journal. That's a well street journal corrupting now irrelevant CNN, and all the other members of the fake news media will headline that Iran had a masterful and brilliant victory over the United States of America, and it wasn't even close. The Democrats and the media have totally lost their way.

They have gone absolutely crazy by the way, I did not read that post. I read, I read parts of it that were in the headlines, and I thought, well, I don't know how much I put into it because he was going off on the Democrats and his words. And I have stronger words that I use, that I can't use on the air. But he was going, it was like one of those types of posts on two social, so I didn't

read the whole thing, but as you were reading it just now, I thought if all of these things happened with Iran, I will agree to a deal.

β€œWell, oh, so did I when I read it yesterday, I went, where's this going?”

Where's this going? This may be the greatest deal he's ever made of all time. I'll read the art of a deal for a 20th time. Oh, my, if this is true, and then I'm like, oh, no, he's just saying, if this all happened. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

But the interesting thing is, you know, he, he, he, just he even read the Wall Street Journal editorial page. I know, I'm sure it gets to him somehow because I don't think he can do it. I can't. Again, as we talked about before, the Wall Street Journal has two sections, the new section

and the editorial section, and they're really separate. Yeah. Yeah. And the, the, the, the, to sit there and make the comparison that the New York Times and the, and the Wall Street Journal are somehow connected is absolutely ridiculous.

Yeah. Yeah. In fact, with the Wall Street Journal is saying and has said the whole time, make a deal, get rid of, they want a ran gone. Yeah.

They don't have the same opinion of the New York Times. And that's, I wonder, at times, whether he even reads the Wall Street Journal.

Because he makes statements on them, maybe something hit him from an editoria...

a year ago, whatever, but he always throws a Wall Street Journal in there.

β€œBut the editorial page has simply done what most Republicans have done and most Republican”

media. Yeah. Yeah. And defeat them, right, get this thing done, don't leave it. You know, don't, don't leave it.

Don't give them a deal. Do not give them money. Make sure you verify, try, you know, going back to the, the, the, the, the, the old salt agreements between the, the, the Soviet Union in the United States, trust, but verify. Which means you really don't trust.

Right. Exactly. Exactly. I'm Chris Fanfleet, go behind the scenes and beyond the headlines with the biggest names in pro wrestling and beyond.

You could pop up in WWE tomorrow, would Serbia be there or would page be there? Hey, 1 100% there. So when you're setting up Logan Paul to frog splash you through the announce table, it's going through your mind. This should make every headline in the world, but it makes sense, right, in Jelly roll.

We knew we had that kind of a moment. Mindset, motivation, and what it takes to succeed. Insight with Chris Fanfleet, follow and listen on your favorite platform.

And, and so, but I just always find interesting these roads in mind, because, you know,

if you actually subscribe to the Wall Street Journal, really just for the editorial page. Yeah, you know, and yeah, and they, when you look at it, some of the strongest support for the president's legal position when the Democrats were coming after him came from the Wall Street Journal. Yeah.

β€œAnd, and that's why I just wonder at times, you know, why he's using them, you know,”

what it is about, you know, I don't know why he calls it, you know, does he call it the China Street Journal for a reason? Is that, is that, well, does he disagree with him on tariffs? I don't remember what it was, but that's when Murdoch was sitting in his office, remember. I don't think he called it the China Street Journal at that moment.

But he, there's, Rupert, Murdoch, just setting a few feet away from him.

And he's just ripping it to shreds, just ripping it to shreds. And, I think he mentioned, and I can't, I can't remember exactly, but I do believe he mentioned in that moment being controlled by China or something, it may have been on trade. I just remember Murdoch being right there, it's just a few feet away, and he's just shredding it.

It was almost, it was almost, as if he didn't know Murdoch, Murdoch was, well, no, no, I knew he, it was very apparent that he did. It was reminiscent of him on Larry King going, hey, could you back up?

β€œYou've got really bad breath, Larry, has anybody ever told you that?”

That actually happened before he was president, of course, it was years ago, when Larry was still around and still interviewing Donald Trump, he said, "You might backing up, you've got really bad breath. Has anybody ever told you that? It's horrible."

It's a mix between, you stink, I mean, it's a mix between garlic, denture cream, and smoke. That's the smell I'm smelling right now, Larry, could you back up? No, he actually said to him, "You've got bad breath, could you back up?" And so I kind of compared that Rupert Murdoch thing on the Wall Street Journal, as they're

sitting there in the Oval Office, and he's just shredding the Wall Street Journal. You ready? Yeah. You want to play it? This is the Larry King 1, all right, here we go.

1989. 1989. I love the fact that we can have found out the show like that. Sure, yes. Here we go.

Here we go. Can one of us sit back a little bit, because you are breath is very bad. It really is. Has this ever been told you we've no, okay, that won't go on there. Actually, that's how you get the edge.

And the liberal media, Donald Trump has afraid to talk how he really feels, you know, he just, yeah, Rupert Murdoch sitting there, oh, hi Rupert, let me talk about the Wall Street

Journal for just a second, yeah, he just shredded them on that day, it was ba...

It was bad, yeah, so I don't know if he reads the editorial page, I think it gets back

to him. I think maybe he does. I tend to believe that he's watching some Fox News reading some Wall Street Journal. And then someone points to, you know, maybe the New York Times or something, and it shows up somewhere in front of him, Washington Post occasionally, but, yeah, I don't know that

he understands or, I guess, cares about what, you know, what they think, if they disagree with him on a core issue, it's pretty much over. Now the liberal activist media can't say any more well, he's just targeting us. No, because at times, he'll go after Fox News.

β€œOh, yeah, he's going to have to fly, is anybody watching Fox?”

Yeah, right, yeah, who was it, what's your name on Fox News that he went after? This is three or four weeks ago, not too long ago. I forget what you see us. No. No.

By the way, did you, I just saw the numbers. Yeah. Do you know that Fox News Sunday is, I mean, in such low fourth place? No. Yeah.

I mean, all the, all the shows have, like, over two million, George Steppenopolis has

been leading Fox 884,000. Really? Yeah. Wow. That's a place in the Sunday morning.

Wow. Interesting. Interesting.

β€œNow, I remember that's not, I mean, I know it's on the Fox News”

channel, but it's not, it's not comparing the Fox News channel. No, no. No, no. That's a whole. Right.

This is the network. Right. The network Fox. Yeah. Yeah.

I saw that was a low.

No, but he's, no, he's going to have to, he's going to have to Fox big

time. Oh, yeah. Remember, remember, was in 2020, where he said, I don't watch Fox, I watch news Macs. Remember the whole thing with news Macs?

They were just promoting like crazy. The president, listen, they're watching us. The president watches us. Yeah. So, yeah, I, I think, I don't know, it's, I think he takes in as much as he can, usually

likely on Air Force One, you know, or in the morning when he's having, you know, breakfast at 2 a.m. when he gets on. Oh, no, I'm sorry. I need to use the Democrat answer for yesterday. Yeah.

Because he's going to the doctor again because he's got dementia. Yeah. They were going. I just, it was, it was so poor. Yeah.

The media yesterday were just going, why, oh, why is he going again? Who has to go to the doctor three times, you know, in, in three times and 13 months. And I went, I've been to the doctor three times and 13 months. Actually, I go, and I've been four times. Yeah.

Every, well, I, you know, minds, just a general check, I mean, general check out every six months. Yeah. That's now. Now, I may, I may type to diabetic, but it's all under control.

Right.

β€œNo, there is, the, the only thing, you know, it's really for the six month blood”

work is all it is. Well, I've been diagnosed with hypocondria, so I go in every four, I seriously go in every three months. It is every three months. My follow-ups are, everything is also, but yeah.

And, and so yeah. I don't have anything, but I believe I have everything. But somebody who was 80, yeah, I can see them going in, you know, yeah. In fact, both of my parents, I mean, things to, uh, the care they get, they actually get the care in their home.

So they, their, while their doctor doesn't come to the house, the nurses do nurse practitioners do, and so they can take, uh, whatever they need samples, any kind of blood sample or anything like that, to the doctor's office, then if they have to go to the doctor's office, but that's a regular thing. Now, dad is 93 as of last week, mom's 88, but yeah, if you're at that age, you're

going to go. You're going to go more off. It's just the way it is. I'm hoping that by the time, you know, being a hypocondriac, I'm hoping by the time God willing that I reach 80 years old, I'm going every day once a day, every day.

So it's, it's the liberal activist media wanting to end, and, you know, with the Chuck Todd comment, well, he's not busy.

He's just loud.

What the hell does that even mean?

That he's, he's all talking is not doing anything. He's just so, I mean, you know, it goes back to the thing of, this is how they think and how they behave, they, they project that onto others, that, that really is the case. You know, they, they, they, they talk and talk and talk and they don't do anything.

β€œRemember when the president was a, I made this trip to the Middle East, and this was”

before we bombed the nuclear site in Iran, but he made the trip to the Middle East. And there, it was a source story to be fair. But the source was from somebody that was part of the Biden administration or, or worked for Biden, it could have been a staffer, but it worked in the White House with Biden saying it's over refreshing to see somebody who has enough energy to make all of these trips

and get all these things done. Sorry Chuck Todd, but he's getting a lot more done than you are. But you, the thing is you can't sell it. Yeah, you can't sell it. It's your odd of it.

Yeah. Yeah. You may, you may.

And the interesting thing is there were a couple of people that, that wrote and said, look,

yeah. I'm not a Trump fan.

β€œBut to sit there and compare it, Trump and his cognitive abilities even had some Democrat”

said it. Yeah. In response at Chuck Todd post, and Chris Alis also was on top of it, too, the same thing. Yeah. Yeah.

Three times and 13 months. And it was just like, you, you can't sell this and even Democrats were saying, you can't sell this. Right. You can't sit there and say the Trump is Biden, and his loss of cognitive abilities

is Biden has you just can't sell that to the average person.

Right. You sell it and you're certainly, you know, you could pick somebody else in the Republican party. Maybe if you pick McConnell, you could do it. Yeah.

But you're not going to do it. It's, it's stupid. It's, you know what it shows. You've got nothing else. Yeah.

Exactly. Because if you're leading with that, yeah, it's like you don't have anything. Right. We are right. Radio.

Brought to you by FPPF, fuel power max. Uncompensated detention to docs, frustrates drivers of all strikes. If you're an owner operator, you have at least some control over the matter. Make the subject a standard part of your rate and/or contract negotiations on the front end. You can use your own numbers to calculate an hourly rate to compensate for lost income

opportunity, as well as fixed costs, which don't stop when the truck stops. Those two elements of a fair detention rate were deemed appropriate by most of overdrive's audience almost a decade ago. We've used income, fixed costs, and miles average of our owner operator business services from ATVS's clients to compute an average $64 an hour detention rate then, and

10 years later, the figure is $83 an hour. Use your own numbers to calculate your rate. A simple conversation with any broker or shiver or your carrier, if you're least, about what you're putting in the rate might yield results you don't expect. Order operator business 101 is provided by overdrive's partners in business program.

Go to overdriveonline.com to the partners in business section of the website for more details on this and many other topics. We're onto you by Shell Rotella, with advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. We'll be right back with more red-eye radio with every currently and dairy-mectamera.

I want to make sure I have this story because this reminds me of this is sort of the bizarre world of chas or chop, remember?

β€œYes, chas, chas, chas, chas but I think it was chop at one point.”

It was chop then it was chas, they've changed it, remember the summer of love creating your own city, this is sort of the bizarre world of this, frustrated, I don't know, I saw the story two days ago, I don't know if the city made them take it down or not, frustrated Seattle residents living in the city's troubled Aurora Avenue corridor are taking public safety into their own hands.

After a violent weekend shootout, rattled neighborhoods are ready plagued by prostitution, trafficking and recurring gun violence, neighbors told Fox 13 Seattle, they've started erecting makeshift barricades on residential streets after repeated police to city leaders and police for stronger enforcement allegedly went unanswered. They've got these same cars can't get through, wow, you get, I mean they're in the middle

of the street, yeah, they're trying to protect their own homes, yeah, wow.

Observing and analyzing the insanity.

Eric Hurley and Gary McNamara, likely on Brutile Radio.

β€œAnd he is here crawling on Gary McNamara, uh, download our red-eye radio app today and”

you can listen when and where you choose, yeah so the story out of the Seattle, frustrated Seattle residents living in the city's troubled Aurora Avenue corridor are taking public safety into their own hands after a violent weekend. Neighbors told Fox 13 Seattle, they've started erecting makeshift barricades and I saw the story on it from a TV station the other day.

On residential streets and a reminder me of Chad and chop and all that after repeated police to city leaders and police for stronger enforcement allegedly went unanswered.

The growing outrage follows an early morning shootout Saturday near Aurora Avenue, North and

North 98 street where Seattle police responded at the reports of more than 30 gunshots fired surveillance video obtained by Fox 13 Seattle show men ducking behind vehicles and exchanging gunfire in the street as bullets ripped through the neighborhood. Police later recovered roughly 40 shell casings scattered across both sides of Aurora Avenue nearby homes, buildings and vehicles were struck by gunfire.

Who the heck are these guys, you know, who who think that they can just shoot up the neighborhood said Rudy Pantoga who works for the owner of a nearby property damaged by the shooting told Fox New Seattle, it is insane. It's unacceptable and it's wrong and the mayor needs to step up to the plate. Residents say this area has become increasingly dangerous in recent months with many reporting

near nightly gunfire and criminal activity, spilling from Aurora Avenue and the surrounding neighborhoods. Some residents have since responded by installing homemade barriers intended to block traffic and discourage criminal activity for moving into the neighborhood streets after initial barricades were vandalized, neighbors rebuilt them with stronger reinforcements nearby a

hand in hand written chalk message reads no gunfire. We're just afraid that a neighbor is going to have to die before the city is doing something and other residents said, I'm just thinking how long they're going to allow them to keep that up. But then when the, you know, the city public works department comes to take them down

because they reinforce them. They're really heavy. They got rocks and everything in it. You'd need, you know, some type of earth moving equipment, some of the out of there.

β€œYou know, so the police are going to show the TV cameras will be there and that's what”

they want. Right. You know, they know they're not going to be able to keep the barricades on a public street up. Right.

Yeah, you don't have the authority to do it. But they, but they, they said, this, how else do we get publicity? And by the way, it got national publicity. Well, yeah, you know, we said this during chop and chas and chad and Charlie, surely.

And it, you know, because our first concern or question was about how the locals respond,

the locals living in that area that are affected negatively by that kind of behavior.

β€œAnd you have to, at some point, you feel like, in fact, they do feel like, in this case,”

well, we'll take matters into our own hands, you know, we'll put up barricades. I don't, man, I'll tell you, I don't know what, I can't imagine that kind of frustration. I just cannot imagine that kind of frustration, because it's not like you can just pick up and move in a day. It's, what else, what else can you do?

What other choice is there? And when they were, when it was going on, Chad and Chas and Charlie, I, I, I just, I, I, at that point, I thought to myself, well, they're going to have to give it, then of course, all the violence happening. And that was going to be the end of it.

I just can't imagine, because the first thing I would think of is, is moving,...

And you no long term, a lot of these people that are, you know, doing this trying to basically

β€œget back and say, all right, we're just going to put up the barricades.”

You know, they're considering, they've, they've got to go, you know, this is the problem with these liberal, run areas. They think they can get away with anything and everything and that people will stay. It's not just about the cost of living, it's not just about taxing the billionaires. It's not just the billionaires that want to leave.

Things like this are part of the mass exodus that we're seeing. CNN yesterday, Harry, and doing the polling thing, was talking about crime, then if you look at it, you know, when, when Trump became president, he was up plus four in, in crime, Republicans were up plus four in crime, Republicans now up 13 in crime. Yeah.

And even Democrats, and the interesting thing is, I'm, let me play this part here from Gaharianton, when he, as he talks about Democrats and, and crime, okay, here it is. It's an interesting divide within the report us, excuse me, within the Democratic Party here. Yeah, okay.

So, you know, what, one of the great fault of the, well, I, right now, we see within the Democratic Party is between white college graduates and non-whites with no college degree. And look at this, Democrats. This is among Democrats, want them to be more central on crime.

Look at this, non-white, no college, 59 percent, the clear majority versus the white college

graduate, which is 42 percent, in fact, say they want Democrats to be more central on crime. So, this is one of these great dividing lines, right, in which those centrist voters of color are feeling one way, at least those with that college degree. Well, those white college graduates, oftentimes, who, of course, a lot of folks would make

the argument, hey, they're not the ones who are necessarily feeling the impact of higher crime rates, where they exist, where there's this real divide within the party, and it's going to be very interesting to see how in Los Angeles, especially if there's a runoff, whether or not rat tries to play Democrats off against each other. Right.

Now, just like you know, he was talking about the race in LA, that, that, that, that we have

β€œprat now is, uh, was just a, was a month ago, I think he was at, uh, seven percent”

chance of winning, now it's 27 percent.

He goes one of the things is crime, and it pointed out, now this is a national survey, but white college Democrats, 42 percent believe the Democrat should move more centrist, non-white, no college, 59 percent, almost 60 percent of Democrats believe that, uh, that are non-white, no college believe that we need to be tougher on crime. Yeah.

And he makes the point as Ariette and said, when you look at the areas where there's a lot of high crime, uh, and we're talking Democrat cities, the population of blacks is greater than in the suburbs, and he makes the point, hey, white college, white college Democrats aren't as affected by crime as non-white, no college. Think about what that means, especially after 2020, yeah, remember all of that, right.

And so what, what to say is white Democrats don't want to be tougher on crime, non-white, no college Democrats want their party to be tougher on crime. Yeah.

β€œAnd that's why it's so tough to predict elections now.”

It's so tough because there is no standard status quo, you know, we're think about it where we were in the summer of 2020, think about where the radical transgender movement was back then. Oh, yeah. Yeah.

Identity politics, take, you know, the Democrats on crime, take CNN, the mostly peaceful protests, yeah, as a city as a neighborhood is burning behind them, mostly peaceful, think about that. And I don't know what kind of an effect that has, as I said, right now the Republicans only I don't believe that the Iran war in general is a weak point for Trump, whether the

majority or people want to be over there or not. I don't think that's a major issue. His poll numbers really have not yet. The one thing that's killing the Republicans are prices. If the war ends in gas prices go down, as we mentioned, Trump really has no power for

massive across the board tariffs after July, and that gives 90 roughly 90 days for prices to moderate. They will, if the war ends, gas prices will go way way down again.

That takes, that takes a lot of that away from the Democrats, but the Republi...

have the insanity of the Democrats and everything from crime.

β€œWho was it, Brad said in LA, the other, and by the way, this is all getting national coverage.”

He said the other day, they're talking about the homeless and he goes, well, the homeless is not the problem. What do you mean? It's drug addicts. And it's like a lot of Democrats went, yeah, no, he's right, yeah, it's not homelessness.

It's drug addiction, right. And it's absolutely true. I can't get in details, but I have a situation I've told you about, I have a situation with somebody who I knew a long, long time ago, who's been in contact with me and I've

found out, you've got the, I've just put it this way, you've got the professionals.

And the, this, this person has harmed themselves, somebody I knew a long, long time ago and put my name out to a counseling place at a hospital. I have no idea why.

β€œI didn't really, I just don't, for me, but, and saying, I could help them.”

They're trying to stay out of getting help, and this person is homeless. And we'll not get the treatments there for them, yeah, right. And this person has been contacting me to bail them out monetarily once and it's like, no. And actually, I was contacted by the hospitals outreach group, telling me, do you know this person?

I go, not for 30 years.

I've no idea why they're reaching out to me now.

Yeah. And I said, you know, I've, I don't, I said, but, and their basic message to me was, don't enable. I said, well, I don't. You know, I've got to worry about me on that.

That's not me. Right. But, yeah. So I'm, you know, I'm dealing with that right now from somebody who I knew 30 years ago, and is in that situation.

And it's completely, it's completely alcohol and drugs related. Right. And so, and the other thing that he said, that, that, that, that Prat said, he said, they said, well, do you want ice in the city goes, no, I don't want ice in Los Angeles. What?

No, I don't want ice. I don't want these massive ice presence in, at all, in the city of Los Angeles. And we don't have to have it if we cooperate with federal authorities. Right? It's like, well, yeah, right.

β€œWell, no, look, the Tom Homan approach has been what?”

Look, cooperate so that if you happen to have somebody that you detained locally, that you know needs to be turned over to ice, we can do that in a safe environment. And it's safer for the agents, it's safer for locals, local citizens, local officers, and it's safer for the person being detained. What is the problem?

And there is no big show, but the Democrats need the show, they want the show. And so, that's where you have the, no, we're not doing that. That's a very simple approach, and I really don't know where it's going to go this November, because part of me thinks, well, man, pricing is so heavy, but if things remedy on pricing naturally, with 150 days running out on the tariffs and the Iran situation

settling down, then the contrast, think about this. The contrast, while it won't be returning to pricing from 2019, it will be a drop in pricing, especially with gasoline, that will be significant enough to be refreshing, possibly refreshing enough. I'm not saying it'll be, again, it's going to solve the pricing issue, but by contrast,

where we've been at $4.39 a gallon, well, if it drops, and then people are seeing that about the time we get to November, guess what, driving season is done for a while. And that means demand is down, so that could help the GOP. We are right, I radio. Coming up, more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley, it's Red Eye Radio.

We are Red Eye Radio, and he's our Crony and I'm Gary McNamara, I'm not kidding, this is the latest Graham Plattener ad, that private equity, private ownership of the Boston

Red Sox is destroying the Red Sox.

I'm not kidding, I'm not kidding, I'm not kidding, here we go.

β€œPrivate equity is destroyed, our favorite base on teams, stripping them for parts.”

Private equity is buying up our homes, our sports, and our lives.

I will reverse the private equity curse, I'm Graham Plattener, and I approved this message

because I miss mooky bets.

β€œNow, I may be in agreement with this, if the government owns the NFL, that means because”

of DEI, every team would eventually have to win a Super Bowl, and I would get a Super Bowl from my bills.

Finally, not only would you embrace DEI, which would be a miracle, but the Buffalo

bills would have a Super Bowl win. It would also be a miracle, that is a true rat, that's really an ad. No, no, no, that was a real ad, yeah. This is Ridae Radio on Westwood 1. Hello, America, Mark Levin here.

Many people seem to be incubating a rage looking for somewhere to go. Are there times when you think the country is out of control, do you see all these things in you wonder what in the world is going on? What's it this way? Five years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago, do we have the will for not, but we are Americans,

β€œand I believe we absolutely do have the will.”

I do this show for you, and when you're not interested in any more, I will just go away. But my book in show, following, listen on your favorite platform.

Compare and Explore