Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

06-02-26 Part One - Bad Ink

1h ago1:16:0511,250 words
0:000:00

In part one of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, we begin with more fallout from Graham Platner's infamous Nazi tattoo, fueled now by his "sexting" scandal. Audio from MSNOW and NPR in...

Transcript

EN

[Music]

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley,

β€œtalk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day,”

whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is there, and I'm Gary McNamara, good morning.

Good morning, people. Thank you for being here. Thank you. How's everybody? Take it in there.

I'm doing well. How are you, Gary? I can't complain. Actually, you do it for a living. Yeah.

It's a great pool. Yeah.

So, well, you know, why don't know one of the audio.

I mean, there were so many stories yesterday. Yeah. You want to get to the audio cut that really defines everything with plant or right now in Maine. Yes, I do.

β€œThis is, let me make sure I got her name right.”

This is Elise Jordan, who's on MSNBC. Okay. This is MSNBC yesterday. Excuse me. MSNBC.

MSNBC. Excuse me. MSNBC. It should be, you know what? It should be MS for the time being because the way cable news ratings are going.

You know, it might not be long. So, here we go. You ready? This is on MSNBC. Yeah.

You're in trouble. Yeah. And here we go.

The problem is his judgment, which he clearly has been lacking in as an adult.

It's one thing to have foolish youthful indiscretions, but I'm sorry. You cannot get past. It is not a Nazi style tattoo. It is the tattoo of concentration camp guards. It is the very worst tattoo.

You can get if you are getting anything Nazi. And that's a pretty high bar there. So, this has been a slow motion train wreck ever since that tattoo. And knowledge of it hit the world. And it's only going to get worse.

These text, there are multiple women, or all those women going to keep their mouth shut from now until election day. What do you think, Lawrence? You sure that was in Fox News? Yeah.

That sounded very Fox News. It wasn't newsmags. It wasn't. It wasn't. It was MS.

What's going on over there at MS now? What's in the water? Because that sounded sane. I know. That sounded like a clear picture of everything that's going on with platner because it is where she started about judgment.

I mean, that's what you look at. A person's judgment as an adult. She phrased it perfectly. Alan, call over at MS now and see if everybody's OK. Make that call before you call the 60 minutes crew to find out how they're doing.

Well, enjoy your bagel. Get to that here in a bit. Well, I had to start. We had to start out with this because yesterday the excuses were coming in. And we played one analyst, one liberal analyst who said,

It's not a Nazi tattoo. And the Republican consultant responded, All right. I guess we'll get into a discussion of how Nazi tattoo is. And the point that they were think about this,

and point there trying to make us it's not a Nazi tattoo. It's a concentration camp. Like a tattoo. That's so much better. That's so much better.

What's the difference? What's the point you're trying to make? Did you work shop this?

β€œWere there a bunch of liberals sitting around the table?”

And you said, Hey, I got an idea. Let's go with the fact that it's not a Nazi tattoo. Because it's not technically the Nazi party tattoo. A concentration, it's a Nazi concentration camp tattoo, which is not the Nazi party tattoo.

And everybody in favor of going that it's not a Nazi tattoo. Who's in favor? Everybody raises their hands. Who's against? Nobody raises their hands.

You know where these liberal activists in the newsroom learned to debate like that. Are you like that? Fauci. That's something like a Fauci-esque kind of, you know. Well, I don't know who we didn't do this.

We didn't do that. Doesn't matter what your call it. Did you enhance the virus? That's not a Nazi tattoo. It's more of a concentration camp tattoo.

That sounds like exactly like something that would come out of Fauci's mouth. Oh, it's a Nazi concentration camp. I will then fight. What do you people go in crazy?

It's not a Nazi party tattoo.

Yeah. Wow.

β€œYou know, the funny thing is, I saw this yesterday.”

I don't know whether, again, you'll see something on the internet. I'm like, I'm assuming this sounds like something he would say, but there was a quote from Thomas Sol. Yeah. And it is, and it doesn't, whether it's from him or not.

Somebody may call. Well, it's not him. It's his, you know, his sight that said it. I really don't care. It's the quote.

Yeah. The problem isn't that Johnny can't read. The problem isn't even that Johnny can't think.

The problem is that Johnny doesn't know what thinking is.

He confuses thinking with feeling. You know, and we've always talked about, you know, that, you know, about critical thinkers being able to connect the dots. Yeah. The point being made there is, there is no thinking going on. It's emotional instinct of rage that comes out.

Because if, if you're thinking. It's like when. In the last century. I became a radio talk show host and didn't want to do it. And just over a century ago.

And I was, and I was absolutely paranoid about making a fool of myself. Yeah. Right. That I better know what I'm talking about. Otherwise, there just, there would be, I couldn't imagine my family and friends listening and

making a horrible mistake and somebody saying, you're an idiot.

You don't even know what you're talking about.

Again, back then, in my, even in my own 30s, most people don't, you don't, you don't articulate. There's some, you know, get into the media. I mean, now we've got 18, 19, 20 year olds, whatever. A lot of times, I don't believe that their opinions are fully formed. But it takes a while to learn all the topics.

And study all the topics that exist out there. And so, and even today, you know, one of the things that that taught me early on is Don't be afraid to say, I don't know. Yeah. And we've said it on the air.

I don't know. I don't have the information yet. It's one of the reasons when a crime is committed. You know, we're, we may say, okay, it could be this. It could be that.

It could be this. It could be that. But we don't take an absolute opinion on it because we don't have the facts in front of us. And if you don't have the facts and evidence in front of you, we believe it's better to shut up.

Right. But when you, when you hear the left,

β€œI think it's such a great quote because it's not thinking.”

It's emotional rage instinct. Mm-hmm. Well, this is why we say it's like arguing with children. Yeah.

But the problem is children are arguing to keep themselves out of trouble.

But if you're actually having a conversation and they're not trying to defend themselves, they show that they have critical thinking skills. They demonstrated all the time. Anybody who's ever been around a child knows, you know, they're always asking, well, why? Well, how does that work?

Well, why? Well, they're learning. They're curious. These people are activists. They don't care to learn.

And I really believe many of them just don't know. They absolutely don't know what they're talking about. I think part of thinking, just thinking in general, is what are the consequences? Right?

Yeah. What are the consequences of anything that I do? You know, it's like all this endorsement of platinum, knowing that he had the Nazi tattoo. The excuses come out.

Are you actually thinking? Right. Right. Are you walking it all the way through? Right.

β€œAre you -- because, you know, if you want to dive in head first,”

you can, it's not a good idea. You're going to have to -- in the arena of public ideas. And let's face it. These aren't journalists. We've been saying it for years.

They're activists. And as an activist, don't -- as an activist, don't you want to be right? When you're an activist, don't you want to have the argument that nobody can defeat? If you're an activist, what is the point?

The point is to bring about change. Change something that is wrong. Write the wrongs. But how can you do that if you don't know what the hell you're talking about?

If you don't know, I mean, it's like -- all right,

we can compare it to the private sector.

β€œIn any business, product knowledge is number one.”

If you're going to be good at a job. Whether it's in sales or whatever it is, management -- that's a matter of what it is. Product knowledge is number one. You've got to know everything.

You've got to know enough, certainly, to talk about it. You don't have to be the genius in the family, but you better know enough to get the job done. They don't care to learn enough to have any kind of debate. But it's not a Nazi tattoo.

It's a concentration camp tattoo.

Right, so the question is, forget about critical thinking,

well, they're thinking in some way, are they? I don't -- no, because in order to use that argument, you've got to know you're going to get stopped. You've got to know that big boot is coming down right on top of your head. Because to ignore that scene, okay, there's --

I can read, I must say they can't read, and there isn't some kind of processing, but the processing isn't if you think of it. Even the Anne-Rethall man had thinking skills in order to survive. Yes, and we're talking basic things here.

Everybody knew it was a concentration camp. They know it now. Everyone knows what it is. Right, so I don't know whether it's -- When I read that time of something,

I was like, you know, we've always said people think, but they don't critically think. Maybe they don't think, maybe he's got a point. Maybe it's just pure emotion with no critical thinking -- with no thinking skills, actually,

and I guess it would be what's thinking and critical thinking.

I've always thought thinking in general was critical thinking to begin with, but does the emotion just dominate? And I'll use this an example, which I've told the story before. This was back a couple of months ago when I was back in New York,

and I met a couple. And they asked you what I did, and we started talking about things, and the one gentleman, and very nice couple, by the way. Very nice couple. And we were talking about something.

It goes, "Well, the thing is, conservatives believe that, you know, they're the ones that are patriotic. Yet they're breaking the flag law, and they were flags all the time as clothing."

They sound very nice. And I'm like, "What?" It was actually, it was a nice guy. I mean, he was saying it out of passion. Like he had an argument.

He had a point. Yeah.

And I said, "I don't know of,

you know, there may be somebody."

β€œI said, "You know, when I think of the last person”

who you might be able to make that argument with, it might be Jim Craig, with the USA, you know, one against the Russians, but he wasn't wearing it as clothing. He was draping the flag over himself.

It wasn't a piece of clothing. Right. Well, no, they weren't all the time. You see stars and stripes, I go, that's not what the flag code says.

And it's not a law. It's a flag code. It's a code of respect. Right. You don't go to jail for not following the flag code.

Right. Otherwise, it's not a piece of advice. Coming in to work. Any time around Memorial Day or whatever,

you see a ton of people with their flags out and no spotlight on it at night. Right. You know, so it's not, it's not against it. It's a suggestion.

Well, they say they're patriarchal, but they're not wearing the flag. The flag has to be an official flag. A flag is not stars and stripes on a shirt. A flag, you know,

a decal, whatever on your shirt. That's what we're uniform or you know, that's not considered and a flag. A flag is when you take, you know, that three by flag and you put it out or a smaller flag,

or whatever. And you put that into clothing. Now, of course, on the uniform, it is more than just code. It is, of course.

And military. Right. Right. So. But by the way, which is, which is,

you can make the case that's law. But yeah, but he's, and I said, let me get, I said, and I went right there. I said flag code.

What does it actually mean?

β€œYou know, can you wear stars and I showed it to him?”

Because I don't believe anything that I read. That was his argument. I don't believe anything that I read. Well, of course you do. You have a, you've been expressing opinions to me.

You believe something. Then, and when are you just repeating what other people say? And I said reading show me your evidence to back your opinion.

Now, because I don't have it right now.

You've got your smartphone.

What can I know? And you just hit on something. Because you told the story before.

β€œBut, but, yeah, to open it up even further,”

many, many of them on the left. Only repeat what they've heard. Yeah. They'll talk about Charlottesville all day long. And not know the truth.

Michael Rappaport. At least he admitted. And it was very late in the game. I think it was, what? March of 24.

When he said before he found out the truth. He looked it up and read the entire quote and said, Democrats have been lying and then he read about all this other stuff. They were lying about and everything else. You know, at least he got around to it.

But they sit and repeat things. They can read going back to your earlier point. They can read, but they don't. Well, when, when, what I see is.

It's incredible rage based on ignorance.

And no curiosity when challenged at all to say to think or when they are, they, they, they first, that first impression hits them. Somebody throws something at them. They don't say, oh, I wonder if that's true or not.

β€œThey just believe it. And when someone says, well, how do you know?”

Well, how do you know? Well, I know because of this and this. Well, I don't believe anything that I read or anything that you read. Well, then how do you come to your opinion? Right. And they just stare at you and move on to the next topic.

There's no curiosity at all. And to me, that's where I sit there and think, well, maybe that's the whole no thinking part. If there's no curiosity at all to find out what the actual truth is, how much thinking is actually involved.

Right, no, it's a great point. We are Red Eye Radio. Brought to you by Hot Shot Secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller. Once a roadside inspection is completed,

the officer will close it out. If violations were discovered, most officers as a courtesy will explain the violations to the driver.

β€œIf there were any out-of-service violations,”

the officer will normally explain what must be done to get the out-of-service order lifted. Drivers need to be very attentive during this part of the inspection. The driver also needs to read and understand the complete inspection report. The driver has 24 hours to get the roadside inspection report to the motor carrier. If the driver will not be returning to a company facility within the next 24 hours,

the driver needs to know to get it on the way to you via email, mail, or fax within 24 hours. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. We'll be right back with more red-eye radio with every currently in Gary McNamara. [music]

We are with our radio. He's our currently in I'm Gary McNamara. Let's just play it one more time because this is from MSNow. We'll move on because it's so precious because the left was going back to its scene. They had nothing left on plateners. They were going back to the last couple of days and we brought you some examples.

Well, it's really not a Nazi tattoo. This is on MSNow. All right. Here we go. This is the liberal station.

The problem is his judgment, which he clearly has been lacking in as an adult.

It's one thing to have foolish youthful indiscretions. But I'm sorry, you cannot get past. It is not a Nazi style tattoo. It is the tattoo of concentration camp guards. It is the very worst tattoo.

You can get if you are getting anything Nazi and that's a pretty high bar there. So this has been a slow motion train wreck ever since that tattoo. And knowledge of it hit the world. And it's only going to get worse. These texts, there are multiple women.

Are all those women going to keep their mouths shut from. There you go. There you have it. Making all these solid points on MSNow. So the liberals are saying, It's worse than a Nazi tattoo.

[MUSIC] CafΓ© in his best form. With Cuba, with every cafΓ© on Knopfdruck for a genus moment. With the new Cuba-Wan capsule machine from Cuba, you can find the cafΓ© from special places.

Full Monday, ArΓ΄men, Dank Innovative Press Blue Technologie and 7-Sorten CafΓ© every day.

[MUSIC]

[MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC]

[MUSIC]

The show that never stops.

Red, I, radio. [MUSIC]

β€œAnd he is there currently and I'm hearing McNamara download our red-eye radio app today.”

You can listen when and where you choose. Thank you. And I tell you the people all the time. I got a friend of mine. Yeah. Who was saying, he said about a week ago, he just said,

I just, I can't stand, I can't stand anything that's on during the day. Yeah, right. We're on during the day. And I went, well, we're on during the day. Yeah.

He said, I wish I could listen to you at night. I've known this person for a significant period of time. And I'm like, we've got an app. We podcast. All day after the show is over.

Look, it had stays on forever ago.

Oh, really? I've told you 50 times. Look, you know, over the years, we've heard so many excuses from listeners as to why they can't stay up late. Yeah, yes.

You know, in their lane. I'm like, I have to sleep. Work. I have to work. You have to make a living family.

Health. You know, all these lame excuses. So we said, you know what? Fine.

β€œWe'll just, we'll just put it on an app and you can listen whenever you want.”

We would prefer, you listen on one of our great radio stations. You and I are very proud. We're radio guys to the court. Yeah.

And, you know, we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

β€œAnd we're not familiar with this new technology.”

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

We're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology.

β€œAnd we're not familiar with this new technology.”

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. We're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

β€œAnd we're not familiar with this new technology.”

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

And we're not familiar with this new technology. And we're not familiar with this new technology.

β€œAnd I think I won't repeat root because we don't repeat rumors.”

If it's a specific allegation that comes out from a new source, we will report it. And we'll report that in from that new source. And they're source to it. And because you and I don't.

And I don't care who it is. I don't care if it's Fox News News Max or CNN or MS. Then I don't care. MS Long ago. I don't care who it is.

If a source. I would love this one. A source familiar with this situation. Well, I'm familiar with this situation.

I can mean anything.

So we were very careful about that because I had no idea.

But MS now.

β€œThe audio got asked to be the audio cut of the day.”

Because we played it twice. And the first stop. So it's makes a solid point of who knows what could happen. This is what the Democrats have to be worried about right now. Now, this happened with headset.

With the nomination of headset. And we said, well, hold on a second. Susie Wiles was reportedly livid that he had not come forth with, you know, some things that came to the surface. And then the question, the rumor also included this idea that Susie Wiles,

Trump's chief of staff. Now, said basically, they're better not be anything else. You better be telling us everything. And this is what the Democrats are doing with platinum. Because it is a big deal.

And it falls on the party. You know, the person, anybody who's saying, well, you're not from Maine. And know how the Senate works doesn't know. It would be one thing if he were running for the state Senate.

But no, that's not it.

The problem is, and I've said this for a long time.

Whatever you do, whatever baggage you bring, you bring it for the whole party. It's not just about the people in your state that are going to vote for you or not. It's about your entire party and what they're willing to include or exclude. Who they're willing to sever ties with or make excuses for.

That's what it comes down to. And so whatever baggage you bring, everybody carries it. Everybody carries it. And your party pays the price or not. I think I know just for myself.

I don't know anybody else. I'm not going to speak for anybody else. But I know for me just here in the first two days of the week. I just, I shake my head. One of the things that has amazed me really since 2018.

And if you've been a long time listening to the show, you probably remember after the 2018 I said, you know, Democrats are going to have to change. They cannot continue to go down this road. And to be where we are now, especially the last few days after this weekend.

And Democrats justify a comi, a comi Nazi predator app. Yeah. Sexteen victim is how, you know, they wish to refer to him as they haven't used the word victim.

β€œBut that's how they're trying to portray him.”

You know, and initially remember, he's a victim of whistleblower. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, the whistleblower in the campaign. You know, how dare this private, it's just, it's amazing to watch this, this go on because you cannot sing further.

As I said yesterday, you can't,

there's never been any evidence.

Trump is a Nazi. Right. And you've just blown it forever. Yeah, with the endorsement by so many Democrats of a guy who had a concentration camp tattoo.

And he knew what it was. He knew what it was. He knew what it was. And I said, well, I'm a comiist. And again, though, as we have said,

if you're anyone with a critical, any type of critical thinking skills, you're like, so you're debating whether you're a Hitler or Stalin. Yeah. So you're not in a longer Hitler, you're Stalin. Yeah.

I mean, it's just, it's the most bizarre. And even that right there, I would, you know what I've said, you know, thinking, as you said, it sounds like Tim Walls with a deeper voice.

Yeah. And, you know, I'm deeper voice. And, you know, I'm doing these manly things. But then again, Walls was the, what assistant football coach or something like that.

Yeah, something like that.

β€œAnd, but remember, he was a permission structure.”

You know where I'm going. Yeah, a planner. Who's he the permission structure for? Right. Exactly.

Exactly. Just, just, you know, we need real. We need somebody like this because he's a permission structure for. Uh, what? Right.

And, and I just, it's just, it shows you, even though it's just one Senate race in a relatively small state, it can affect the direction of where the country goes. But I think what's also incredibly fascinating is what.

The Democratic Party is attempting to sell here.

Yeah, especially the hypocrisy of how without any evidence.

Trump was a Nazi or.

β€œMaking up stuff as they did in Charlottesville.”

Right. Not using his entire quote line about it. Working with the Russians and the Russian. I mean, none of it, none of it was true. In fact, we know it was a Hillary campaign that set it up.

And then just seeming to ignore this. Yeah. And making excuses for it. Yeah. Amazing.

We are right. I read you. You're in touch with what I read you. toll free at eight six. Might be right.

I. Here when I read you. He's are crumbling. I'm Gary McNamara.

Well, there's a new syndrome out there.

Yeah. Just right here. Exios Democrats hit by last minute. Platner anxiety. So.

Platner anxiety. Yeah. It's not last minute. By the way, is it is a new condition? Yeah.

It's called it's called vetting. It's. It's called vetting. And it's been around for a long, long time. And, and look, you know, you make excuses.

Make excuses. But you've got to listen to yourself. Listen to what you're saying out loud while making excuses. They sound stupid. They sound horrible.

[ Music ] Hey there. I'm Paula Penn. I help people make the smartest money decisions possible. If you don't control your money, it controls the idea.

You're not in control of your finances.

β€œAnd you have to look outside of yourself to live the life that you want.”

You're not in control. You're like, like, what is it that you actually want? Money should follow the dreams and goals. Because sometimes you make the dream and goal the money. And you've overworked yourself.

And you've exceeded what you've needed for the actual thing you want. Sometimes we forget like, what's the actual thing you want? A Ford Anything. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. [ Music ]

Now, it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara. And Eric Hurley, about everything from Father Text to Social Issues. And who's of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is there. Carlton, I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome.

Good morning. Thanks so much for being here. Thank you. Okay. Just a couple more audio cuts that I found here at the top of you.

Okay, fine. But it's just, it just came from pilot on and pilot on and pilot on. You know, we talked about the app that's called that the National Center for Sexual Exploitation calls it a Predator's Paradise. Yeah.

Okay. Here's Lisa Marie Booth on Fox News talking about yesterday about a grand planner in Maine. Because reports are, he's still got his account open.

And here's what she said about it yesterday.

Here we go.

β€œIt's a very important point out that it's even more disturbing than that.”

He was apparently on on this app called kick. And 60% of kicks, 15 million monthly active subscribers between the ages of 13 and 24 years old. The National Center on Sexual Exploitation. Exploitation, rather, has labeled it a Predator's Paradise. So I do have questions about why you would be on a site like that.

So you've got that. You've got the Nazi chest had to. You've got the sexting scandal with other women. He has made races remarks. You made the remark about that the, you know, the better and should have been hit rate.

It's it's on and on and we're not even in a general election. [laughter] Here. I just like we're not even in general election. All right.

Sunny from the view. Not to make her point. She has to lie. Okay. But she goes after.

Plattener. But in order to make her point that. He's Dr. Evil. Now she didn't say it. I'm saying it. It's not. It's not. It's that you have a worse doctor evil. Yeah. And we also, and this, the doctor ego evil and power is worse because there's no checks and balances. Oh, which is where that's the lie. Yeah, that's the lie that she uses to justify that she'll still vote for a plan or here we go. He's also made racist remarks about against African Americans. So he's a cheater. He's an anti-Semite because the fact that he's a man.

He had that tattoo for 20 years and didn't know what it was. Is a lie. Okay. Yeah. Oh, that's right. Okay. That is a lie from he didn't know it was okay. So he's a liar. A racist and anti-Semite, he's a homophobic. So he's all the things. And character does matter, but we have someone that has almost unbridled power in the White House at this point. There is no, there are no checks and balances.

The only way that we can maybe bring a bit of our democracy back is by having...

Just like they are for every person. Yeah, explain, of course, she never will. You can't explain a lie. Yeah, because there is no foundation for it. It's a lie. It's made up. It's from nothing.

Yeah, there is there are checks and balances. We see them already. Well, let's say tariffs Supreme Court. A number of things that. An immigration that that Trump. Yeah. That because this goes back to the whole no king's thing. Right. And, you know, unchecked. That's wrong. No checks and balances. That's wrong. That's a lie.

And I always find it interesting when somebody sits there and calls somebody a liar and then their conclusion is based on a lie. I know. And she's clearly lying.

I was talking to Stephen Tyler the other day. There's so many liars out there.

β€œThese, those, you know, but they, again, this is what she has to do. What we need to check some balances. So what are you saying?”

Are you saying, well, we need platinum for the checks and balances? I mean, what we're, what's your point to all this lying. There has to be a point. If you're going to lie.

If you're going to go out of your way to tell something that is not true, there has to be a point to it. And she's basically saying, well, we, you know, he's a, he's a, he's a bigot, he's a cheater.

He's a homophobic, they need homophobic racist races. I semi. Yeah, but you know, we got Trump. So we're just going to have to put him in. What? Because of, let me tell you this lie. I just, my conscience is sued by my lie, but Trump is a wizard. He has a wand and can make things happen with that magic wand.

β€œWell, I want to make sure I get this in because we talk about talking about the president, this is something good. And I don't want this to slip by because one of the most important things.”

I mean, that's not only discussed, but the panic comes in is when these states that have said we wish to destroy our grid end up destroying their grid. They're in, say, we want a skyrocket electricity prices, you know, their deity. We're talking about Obama. Yeah, who ran on skyrocket electricity prices. And now they've been skyrocketed, start complaining.

β€œThat's the only time you hear about it. Really in the mainstream media. So it's important that we put this out. National review had this, a year of deregulation ignited an American nuclear renaissance.”

In 12 months, the United States has seen the first non-light water reactor construction permits and ground breakings in decades, multiple small modular reactor design approvals, major funding commitments. The restart of long dormant plants and fuel cycle activities, new testing infrastructure and parallel regulatory pathways that invested billions in the sector, the core deregulation focused order. Reform the nuclear regulatory commission to cut red tape, set strict licensing deadlines for a maximum of 18 months for new reactors.

Cap regulatory fees and created expedited pathways for designs already tested by the Department of Energy and Department of Defense. In the campaign in order to address DOE reactor testing reforms and revise the agency's authorization process to reduce the red tape while maintaining safety. The DOE launched the reactor pilot program shortly after the orders creating a streamlined department of energy pathway outside the traditional bottlenecks for advanced reactor demonstrations. 11 projects with three already securing final documented safety analysis that will reach critically the state in which the nuclear chain reaction becomes self-sustaining by July 4th of this year.

That's a remarkable achievement.

It reflects a major shift in philosophy, subjectary vice provost for research of the Illinois Institute of Technology and an expert on the nuclear energy systems, instead of requiring every possible question to be answered before anything get built.

β€œIt's built regulators and the Department of Energy are now much more willing to test designs in stages and learn from actual operation.”

There's a panic now you see it coming from the left you see it every day. I've got somebody who I'm acquainted with who I talked to a couple of months ago. And when I talked to I went oh she asked you what I thought about the radical transgender movement I told her she was in complete agreement. The other day she posted a panic you know one of the liberal websites panicking about about data centers. You know we already have 4,000 data centers in the United States of people don't know that. Yeah and it was the same it's the new climate change. It's the new climate change and they're all panicking you know we have no choice should we have you know and again when you look at AI we talk about AI when it comes to information but AI is so much more than just information.

Right right AI is you know the technology the science things you're going to be able to do with that to to mass produce in the services sector to create incredible efficiencies.

Yeah there's a problem that we talk about as conservatives that you can see right now the bias in AI when it comes to information but there's bias everywhere nobody already already it's a joke AI when it comes to social media you know when you put in Google AI it's like okay let's find them as stakes in it it's part of our culture. No it really is it's almost like a cross between Wikipedia and Snopes yeah you know and and so that's where that's where it is but this is what I think liberals you touched on something when it comes to information and AI.

I have a family member who used to say I who who just does nothing but every you'll be sitting there talking.

And they'll just type everything in AI well AI says this and I have to remind them hey.

β€œIt's garbage in garbage out so you have to go further and look at the references and AI does show references and you got to.”

references the New York Times maybe you have to dig a little bit deeper but whatever might be but. There will be a time. When that will. Streamline even further I don't think it will be. A point maybe it may be there will be but as long as there's human input there's going to be some bias in there there's going to be some things that aren't at completely accurate.

There's going to be some Fauci isms along the way but what the left is concerned about.

Ultimately is at people using AI in order to learn more things because it's trendy googling at one time.

Was trendy and people still Google. But using AI and now subscribing to AI.

β€œI have another family member who because of his job actually they use it and he uses it every day said it it's an important tool.”

And so if you think about that the left does not want people to be informed that part of it alone. Not just the functionality of what it's going to be for business behind the scenes but for people right now it's trendy. To jump on AI which means it's trendy to follow their curiosity and the left hates that. And the other thing they hate is that you're going to have to if you have more data centers and more AI you're going to have to use more fossil fuels and nuclear. It can't it can't run the data centers can't run on solar and wind and and so they're just they they're it's the entire panic on that but the the panic is just is going.

Crazy right now yeah and it's like we already have 4,000 data centers across United States already exists already there yeah yeah and the reason if we have problems with the grid.

Water yeah you're going to have to figure out what to do for the water and th...

We can provide as much electricity as we want every American and and the states that aren't doing it with the.

β€œElectricity prices are skyrocketing it's because that's what they voted for yep let's see only reason now these are all in and if you're listening New York state right now the only reason that your electricity prices are through the roof.”

That's what you voted for in California store paying more for gas because you chose to that's what you voted for yeah you chose to we know we have conservative friends in New York and California but the majority of the state voted that way and it's not going to change in our lifetime. I'm convinced I hope I am wrong and in both for New York California all the blue states and blue areas I would love to see some common sense thinking I mean you know we heard some common sense earlier from MS now so.

Maybe it's possible well when you look at the fact that hopeful said we've got to do something we've got to delay the climate change rules and the Democrats that absolutely not in the argument is electricity is supposed to be skyrocket. This is this is the intended result the not the unintended results not an unintended result is the intended result right of the policy for electricity in New York state yep is to skyrocket the that was the actual argument we brought you the the evidence a couple of weeks ago on that what they're actually arguing the quotes of what they're arguing.

β€œYou know to the the governor and and to any of the courts or whatever right is that no.”

That was the intended goal wasn't a unintended consequence it is the intended conclusion to skyrocket electricity prices in New York state.

So literally we are right I radio this morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested trusted guaranteed since 1920 eligible specialty crop producers now have until August 7 to apply for USDA's assisted's for specialty crop farmers program. We've got to do the first week of the program will be for folks with log in dot gov accounts to be able to view and submit their application they are prefilled just like the farmer bridge assistance programs were prefilled.

β€œUnder Secretary for Farm production at conservation Richard Ford ice says producers who do not have a log in dot gov account or who prefer enrollment at their local farm service agency office can request their pre filled applications starting June 8.”

Initially we had one billion dollars set aside we're actually going to be issuing one point six billion with a list of eligible specialty crops and payment rates established adhered metrics available online at www dot fs a dot to USDA dot gov slash ACSF I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington DC. This report brought to you by Senex fuels and loops coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley it's red I radio. We are running and he's are probably not. I'm getting back. You know he's concerning the article we were telling you about about how quickly nuclear power is is being revamped here in the United States. I look at this as a success story for the Trump administration which is clearly.

The credit should go to Trump on this without quite this is almost like the corporate taxes you know the corporate tax push that he put in his first term.

Yeah, because this is absolutely critical to the infrastructure of the United States Democrats don't care about it.

You know they're they're still into the climate change crap right and everything else even if you know even if even the UN is backing off on everything we were sold a bill of goods we were sold a lie on it, but the Trump when it came to getting the corporate tax cut as he did to 21% And then this here was 21 right. Yes, and then then then this here you look at it and you say yep, everyone's willing to criticize Trump as they should be if he's wrong. And the Democrats will criticize him even when he's right, but this is a case when you look at it and you look where we what we have to do in this country. We've got to be producing a hell of a lot more electricity.

Yeah, we have to be prepared for it. We have to have the reserves. You cannot depend on solar and wind. We see where the direction is is going right now New York's eventually going to have to do something.

Because because because and so is California, well, because affordability rig...

So there's only so long you'll be able to get away with it politically before your party starts to suffer again, not that I expect New York to go blue or California or red or California either, but something will change you're going to have to change your policy on energy and it's only a matter of time.

β€œOverall, America will add enough nuclear energy production by 2027 to power 2 million homes and 4 million by 2029 according to the Department of Energy. That's mind boggling speed.”

And it's what's needed in the United States. We have no choice for our security and I mean economic security and national security absolutely.

So who does to Trump? I mean to me that's that's all on him. He's the one that push that. [Music] Catch Red Eye Radio Live every night on the Red Eye Radio app available in the app store. Red Debt Eye Radio. And I'm hearing Matt, come out along with Eric Hurley coming up in just a minute. Boy, Jill Biden's calling, causing a heck of a lot of, wow, back and forth, really between Democrats.

It's Democrats going crazy over it. We'll have what they were saying then and what they are saying now coming up in just a minute.

For 250 years, Americans have believed in one powerful idea that we were meant to live free. Free to work hard, free to move, free to enjoy life without being held back.

But you know, everyday aches and pains can slow you down and actually, in fact, it's about time if you're living with aches and pains you declared your independence from your aches and pains. And you do it with relief factor like I've done it. Honestly, I was sitting out. You know, there were things that I realized I couldn't do and that's not freedom.

β€œThat's not doing that that's not living your life the way you should be living your life. You need to be taking relief factor like me because I would love for you to get the great benefits.”

My lower back just kept me out of the game too many times. I wasn't participating. That's not living. So try relief factor real simple. You can get the three week quick start just 1999.

And all you have to do is go to relief factor dot com relief factor dot com choose red i in the drop down relief factor dot com where you can call them 800 for relief 800 the number four relief. All right, so back in in 2024 when Joe Biden was running in the Democrats were saying nothing was wrong. We knew that was a lie. Yeah, because Joe Biden is writing her book, by the way, will Democrats buy her book now with all the controversy. I mean, who's going to buy her book. Hunter. Yeah, he doesn't have the cash well, but she bought his paintings. So okay. Okay. So kind of it's a bar pro quo.

I'm going to say a barter and like yours better quit. But when when, you know, whether it was Joe Scarborough saying this is the best Joe Biden ever, I mean, everybody was laughing was obvious to anybody who has any type of of

β€œreasoning power that there was something tremendously wrong with Joe Biden. And that's why that's why the Democrats even now trying to say well something wrong with Trump.”

No, he's erratic. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, that I mean, that's not a sign of of his cognitive abilities decreasing to the point where he should be disqualified as president or running for president with Biden. But it was, it was, or yeah, as I saw, yeah, he couldn't do an interview. And now the problem with Kamala is she has all of her cognitive abilities and can't do a five minute interview, but that's a different story and we'll see what happens in 20 28 with that.

This is a side by side that was put together.

I'm assuming you see, I'm assuming by Republican group here, but it's Senator Chris Murphy in 2024 and Senator Chris Murphy in 2026 both on the same show.

All right, both on face the nation. First, we'll start with 2024. Here we go Joe Biden is incredibly competent and he's incredibly effective.

And this partisan and this partisan hit job by somebody that is looking for a better crowd. We just played by a better known talking about the special counsel is looking for a better job in the next Trump administration is not going to dissuade Americans who actually see with a real world impact on their lives is of Joe Biden's administration.

β€œBut you know, there is a difference here that we're talking about your fellow Democrat was talking about the ability to go out there in campaign. Is there a problem here?”

There's there's not a problem. This president is going to be able to sell a record that is extraordinary. I know that he is ready for this campaign.

I have seen how effective he has been up close and personal and I'm not going to let my constituents be distracted by a special prosecutor is trying to gain favor within the Maga movement.

Now, as we said back then, he's either delusional or he's lying. Yeah, but we, we questioned, we questioned maybe not the cognitive ability, but the observational ability of Senator Chris Murphy back in 2024 when he said that right. We now know he was lying here. He is just this past weekend on face the nation again, same show two years later. How do you convince the public that Democrats are telling the truth now?

β€œYeah, listen, I think Democrats do have to be honest about the mistakes that we made in 2024 obviously in retrospect Joe Biden should have stepped away from that race.”

Oh, I couldn't see what everybody else could see back then in retro spec. Now, if you're a Democrat, don't say, come on, you guys keep going to the past. No, they are. We're just observing what they're doing. Jill Biden brought this upon all Democrats talking about it the last week. So they're the ones that brought it up. We didn't bring it up.

In fact, when it first came out, when she first came out, we said, well, yeah, well, but you know, she's she's lying. We, you know, she's lying about that she thought it was a stroke because

I mean, that the memes appear immediately. I thought my husband had a stroke. So we went out to party later. Yeah, I did not have them stop the events and take him to a doctor to get medical attention. I just decided to let it go on. Oh, he's having a stroke. That doesn't look good. Hey, where's the party out afterward? Huh? I was just going to let him suffer on stage. I know. It's like a life threatening, she thought, these are her words.

I understand what I'm chuckling at. Yeah, about how ridiculous it is the explanation. Yes, right. The line. Yes, she's lying not that somebody has got her problems. She cares digitally and squat about her husband. Yeah, it's one or the other. She's either the line or she didn't really care about the two one last year when we said that last time I wasn't a row that well, it could be both. She's lying and she doesn't care. Well, yeah, but she's lying. She's lying. I don't know if she cares about Joe, but she's lying. Yeah, I thought it was having a stroke.

Which is to say, I thought there was a life threatening event going on with my husband and I did nothing. And then this story veteran democratic strategist James Carval agreed that James Tallarico needs to walk back his past comments if he wants to win in the Lone Star State.

β€œAnd this along with his co-host apparently on his podcast, this is Al Hunt. Hunts that I think Tallarico has to be smart. He has to be aggressive.”

As you suggested, the GOP already has aired in ad accusing him of saving all kinds of weird things. Not accusing him. They didn't accuse him. They played him in his own words. Carval says, well, some of it's true. And he's got to deal with it. Yeah, but he said there's six genders. Well, I don't know whether he said it or not. Yeah, he did. He did.

For God's sake, James, you're not that old.

Okay, most importantly, I think James, what he has to do is say, hey, I may have said some dumb things, but Ken Paxon has committed dumb corrupt acts.

The only thing is about Tallarico. Nobody's going to believe it. It's not going to walk back. No, you know, well, he's tried to walk it back. Nobody's nobody's going to buy it. No, because all you have to do is keep playing it in your own in your own words. And again, Democrats will still vote for him. It's getting the independence to look at it and go, well, I never think it's like the whole vegan thing that they were trying. He's not a vegan. He's not. He said he eats meat. He goes back 27 generations of Texans and a meat meat. I don't care.

We've got what he said about his campaign back in 2021. Right. There was and we remember it was about the environment, right, which is a political position to have.

He was committing his campaign to veganism, right, for climate change. No meat on the campaign. Now, none. The thing is is and people may not know this, especially on the left. The campaign is about that person.

β€œHow long am I going to be able to do this? You know, I'm an old man. How long am I going to be able to do this?”

It's all the insanity. It is hilarious. Oh, isn't it? No, it's not really. It's because it's so easy to tear down. We don't believe people are stupid. We believe people are willfully ignorant. We don't believe people are stupid. We walk through the basic idea of what people are saying. And the whole veganism thing, by the way, wasn't necessary. We're committed to the environment, but you knew. Here's the thing. Right, possibly going through his mind when he came up with that weird, the campaign is going to be vegan.

Well, well, it was that if he claimed to be about the environment, he was going to have to commit to being vegan, but he couldn't do that himself only his campaign except for he is his campaign.

β€œRight, and that was the, whether trying to parse the words, which was just like, you need to shut up. Did you guys have a meeting again on this one to sit there and say, can we separate the individual from his campaign?”

And the fact is, again, you're limited to a couple of choices here. He was lying completely to get the leftist vote and the climate change vote. Right, and the animal rights vote. Right, or he was lying and wanted his campaign to do it, but he wasn't going to do it. Right, he's over there eating a hot dog. They're all over there eating kale. Right. I'll tell you right now. It's got to be one or the other because he's reverse emits and they're indignant. What do you mean? There's no evidence that he was ever vegan.

β€œOnly his campaign was, but he sets the direction of the campaign and he's the one that put through that executive order for his campaign that it'd be vegan. Right.”

It was like the time I thought it out, you know, given up meat and I thought, I'll just be a cookie terrarian. It's just Oreos. Nothing but Oreos. I'm going on an Oreo cleanse. They go through this, they go through this. And they sat around and talked about it. He had to talk to the people working for and volunteering for it. It included volunteers. I don't know if he can force a volunteer to go along with. They put, put down those ribs. We're going to make a statement.

But the people, the critical people in his campaign in Texas, he was campaigning Texas. Remember, we are going vegan.

We are vegan.

No, it's about you.

β€œAnd you're eating meat. You're killing the planet. And the animal is just a different form of it's not an Nazi symbol. It's a concentration camp symbol.”

I mean, this is almost like the same kind of argument that you hear the people just go, shut up. Right. Right.

I mean, it's just in similarities or the similarities of the insanity are becoming consistent.

β€œWe are. I'm going to go home tonight. I'm going to be hurt and my throat's going to hurt from laughing so much. It's just, but it's crazy. Right. We are right. I radio.”

We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.

We're running. I'm Gary McNamara. Yeah. The story about James Carvel saying that, uh,

β€œTaylor, he has to have a campaign where he just disowns everything that he has said before.”

Yeah, even though James Carvel says, I'm not really sure what that is, it's like do some show prep. Yeah. And the thing is, it really, what, what they're doing is what we said before when, when Taylor Rico came and started backing off on the positions that he held, we said, oh, wow. Okay. They're going to try it in Texas. Uh, and we noticed it in 2006 after 2006 where we said, wow, Democrats were actually telling you what they believed now. They're not trying to move to the middle. Right. Taylor Rico's trying to move to the middle, but he really isn't the middle. He really doesn't believe anything that he changes.

He believed what he first said. He is far left radical. That's who he is. Anything he says now is a lot.

Yeah. Exactly. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood 1.

Compare and Explore