Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

06-11-26 Part One - Liar Liar, Now You're Fired

1d ago1:16:0611,108 words
0:000:00

In part one of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, as more details surface about the firing of '60 Minutes' veteran correspondent Scott Pelly, we begin to see the outright lies perpetra...

Transcript

EN

Meditian yoga jogging, I don't think so.

Right, I think my story is totally different.

β€œSteuja, how do you feel? The Steuja is really cool?”

Yeah, I've been to Euro for a long time. Do you have any connections? No, just like Steuja. Wow, and that's just one thing. Sure, the macht fast, all is automatic.

Finally, I feel like I'm so relaxed.

Hold your money, Ty from the Span, with like Steuja. Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley, talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio, and he is here at Curly and I'm Gary McNamara. Bye. All right. We got a lot to talk about today, but I can't believe that I missed this.

I did not see it in the interview that he did, but one of the things we said about Scott Pele getting fired, one of the things I said is, the first thing that I would notice if I was his boss and a ton of other political activists that exist in there is it comes across to the public that you have no curiosity. When you look at the Andrew McCabe interview, for example, as we said, there was a complete

lack of curiosity, which means you go in and you say, "Well, I don't understand this. You make this allegation where does this come from?" Right. You can't tell you, "Well, then how do we know it's legit if you can't tell us?" But we brought that up the other day that, you know, he's a political activist, so there

has to be a lack of curiosity for what you don't want to broadcast. But when he said this, there were two things yesterday that I went, "Wow." When Scott Pele said he had no idea who Barry Weiss was until it was announced, she was going to be the head of CBS News, you're fired. Yeah, you're fired for, you sound like that reporter from the New York Times that pretended

to be traveling and wrote articles as if he were traveling.

β€œRemember that years ago, several years ago, forget how long ago that was.”

But it goes back several years, and it turns out the person was never actually traveling

to go do the stories, just writing them from home. And I thought to myself, at that time, "Well, why would you bother? You work for the New York Times, you're not interested in journalism, go ahead and make it up as you go along." But it sounds like a lame excuse, because remember his position in that meeting where he went

off on the executive producer, and Barry Weiss. It was nobody knows you don't have experience, I mean, this is the thought, see he was trying to convey, just attacking them on your nobody's. And now he's trying to use that as a defense for his behavior. There's no way you didn't know who Barry Weiss was.

If Barry Weiss had never been on board at the Twitter files and came straight from New York

Times to CBS, he would have run down the hall and give her a hug. Oh, yeah, that would have been if she had never done the work at Twitter for Elon Musk's project, she would have been welcomed and straight from the New York Times, welcomed with open arms. He probably would have done a piece on 60 minutes about her.

But it shows you the fact either he's lying, yeah, and I believe he's lying.

β€œI believe he's lying because she authored, remember, the Twitter files, she was the”

main author of it, and what when did she put out that report, which means she was working on it for a significant portion of that year, how long ago did the Twitter files, did the first report come out that Barry Weiss did that was a one of the biggest story in the political story in the country for a significant period of time, that was 2022. So he's trying to convince you, Scott Pellie, that he had no idea of Barry Weiss

Authoring, you know, when the report came out the first report in December of...

three and a half years, he had never had heard her name, had no idea what she did, and then

she took that and catapulted that into the free press, which made noise, which was absolutely absolutely made noise, and he's trying to convince you that he had no idea who she was until she was made the head of CBS News, he's lying, he's lying, and he's trying to justify his childless behavior and his comments during that meeting, that got him fired, yep, I had no idea who she was, yeah, until she's like, it's an absolute lie, but if you're saying,

well, how do you guys know what's in his in his brain, because it was the biggest story of the

year, it was the same thing with the New York Times wrote that editorial on what's her name, on the map, remember the map after the shooting of what was it, somebody that you mean the one that wrote the statistics report, the stats report, no the report that the the the the the the the the the the vice president, or excuse me, the vice presidential candidate at that time, I got my blank here, McCain's vice presidential candidate, Sarah, Sarah Palin, right, the whole

Sarah Palin thing, yeah, yeah, I'm the lawsuit, and everything, what they wrote, right, I'm right of the the target and the target exactly, and we said they knew it, they're lying, they knew it, because we all knew it, it was the biggest story in the media, they were lying, right, yeah, because that's that's around to the Gabby Gifford shoot, right, the Gabby Gifford shooting,

β€œexactly, so they knew, you know, and we said, sorry, they're lying, but if you want to say,”

okay, you guys are going too far, well, then he should be fired, then for a few reasons, number one, he was lying, or number two, if he's considered your main anchor of 60 minutes, and actually has no idea about the Twitter files, Barry Weiss, Elon Musk taking over Twitter, and he's completely clueless as to all of that ever existed, tell me where we are wrong in our analysis, and he should be fired from 60 minutes just because of that, even if you don't believe

he was lying, well, it's because there are a few things here, you and I both believe he's lying, yes, you're a horrible liar, that might be a reason for me to fire you, ah, you can't even lie,

β€œwell, because you're lying to make yourself looks stupid, and now you may be stupid, but I believe”

you're lying here, yes, there's no way you could miss that story, there's no way, you know, in fact you think about it, Barry Weiss has been really at the forefront, you can look at her as the person, because again, creating the free press, but she's been right in the heart of the debate about bias in the media, because she's not a conservative Republican, in her life, she's been a liberal Democrat, that's who she but she believed, and that was the story, and

everybody listening right now, you know it, if you're a Democrat, you know it, and Scott Pally had no idea who she was, it's not, it's not believable, and then the Leslie Stahl story,

β€œI mean, what she said, the worst thing she's ever experienced was the firing of Scott Pally”

in her life, it's like, oh my god, what a blessed life you've lived, that's a co-worker gets fired, that's the worst thing in your long life, you've ever experienced, again,

I don't believe her, no, she's staying that because she wants to create this incredible drama,

which again, if I'm CBS, I'm like, I don't want her, all right, so CBS evening news, Scott Pally was no longer the anchor then, but CBS evening news, air to story on the Twitter files, December, well, of course, it was probably, you know, attacking the Elon Musk and the idea of the Twitter

Files, I don't know, but I'm just guessing, but he was working for 4 CBS news...

at 60 minutes, it was a huge story, there's no way he didn't learn it through the hallways,

if it was on the evening news, they probably put it on the table for 60 minutes, at some point, I don't know if they ever aired anything on 60 minutes. It was one of the biggest stories of 2022, and it was, it was the change, right, because it was after Elon Musk bought what it, right, it was the change, in fact, without the Twitter files, there probably wouldn't have been, much of the world would be saying,

oh, he's, you know, I mean, there's still many of them, we're still saying this, you know, he's just a, you know, someone who moved right, he's just a right wing or Elon Musk,

and he's not justified, but when you, if you took a look at just a basics of what was found in the

β€œTwitter files, you have to be frightened as to what your government would do, and did do during those”

years at Twitter. Yeah, I mean, it was the, nobody, it's probably one of the biggest media stories. Yeah, I don't know anybody that challenged the emails and the messages to you that came out and challenged the messages between like the FBI and the staff at Twitter at the time that was exposed, all that stuff that was exposed. The evidence itself, I don't know that anybody ever knows. No, they attacked them personally, but no, I don't think anybody ever did, but it was the,

I'm looking back and I'm thinking to myself, you know, again, I go back maybe a few years,

it may be the biggest, it might have been the biggest media story since the initial criticism

of the Washington Post as the, you know, being criticized by the Nixon administration for watergate.

β€œYeah, right, because that went on for a while. Those stories went on for a significant period of time,”

but, you know, Elon Musk taking over Twitter, the sensory, the FBI's involvement in it, what the Twitter files found out may be the biggest media story in the past half century, maybe even bigger than watergate, because watergate was just an investigation of a newspaper investigating a story. This was about government intrusion and government influence to sensor what they did like through private organizations and private media outlets and a ton of people

that were anti one candidate involved in working in social media to help sensor with a relationship law enforcement with a relationship to current law enforcement working in the FBI. The closest 60 minutes ever did on the Twitter files was a piece in November of 22, early November of 22 on social media and political polarization in America. Just generally speaking, the chat, the back and forth on social media, but there's no way the following month, CBS

evening news, and again, he wasn't anchor then. Scott Kelly, but down the hallway at CBS evening news, they did a story on it. There's no way he didn't know about it then. You're lying. Scott Kelly. But that was just the report that came out. They had to do story after story. Oh, yeah. I'm assuming of the actual member congressional hearings, yes, where you had, you know, Shellumburger out there, because they were part of it also Shellumburger

and Taibi, especially that were being attacked personally. And then remember what a big story it was was a Taibi where the FBI showed up at the IRS showed up at his door. Was it Shellumburger? I can't remember who it was. I can't remember which one it was. It was one of those,

β€œremember that whole thing. They showed up the day he was testifying. Right. The day it was”

testifying. And remember, he said it wasn't about a refund or something. It was like, yeah, what the IRS doesn't show up at your door like that. Yeah. We owe you money. And so it was it was such a big story. And Scott Kelly is trying to convince you that he didn't know about any of it. Well, then you're fired. You're fired because you're either lying or it had proves what I've said. You are in this insular bubble where you have no idea what the house going on in the world and

you're considered a man of the major focus points. I'm 60 minutes. You're a horrible liar. Yeah. You made up a lie that just makes you sound ignorant. I know. It's just like, I'm that was it was there was there was there was there was there was there was there was there self my thought was there any self awareness here at all. So you know what you're doing. You know how

You're making yourself look like an idiot to anybody who has any type of basi...

all. By the way, is he not childlike? He really is. No, he is. He's a teenager who believes. He's that

kind of teenager who believes he knows more than the parents. Yeah. And he's sounding like he's, I'm just Ron Burgundy. I just read what's on a burner. I don't, I didn't know this very, very wife. I don't know who he is. It's a she. Oh, I'm just learning that. Good. Then you're firing is justified. Yes. Because you're ignorant. It was a massive turn in social media.

β€œI believe it's what prompted Zuckerberg to eventually go on Rogan and say, well, yeah, they called us”

during the summer of was it, uh, 2016 about the about the laptop or 2020 about the laptop and said there's going to be some incident information. We need you to throttle that misinformation down. Zuckerberg, that was his version of the Facebook files basically. But when he was on Rogan, I think maybe another interview or two, he might have said similar things. But basically that this was a huge, huge, huge story. And by the way, if you didn't do it, it also explains the justification

for change, big change at your parent company, CBS news. Because that right there tells you,

well, I didn't even, so you guys never did a story on it. Because imagine that was Trump's FBI

controlling all social media. Imagine that was, uh, Trump directing that, that a, that a geopear was was directing that. Cash, Patel calling. Yeah. Social media. Right. And setting off coming out. Can you throttle this? Yeah. I mean, they were basically setting up office at Twitter. The FBI was. They were setting up a, like, it was like a satellite office almost, you know, they had just become so cozy there at Twitter controlling the message. And we know Facebook the same thing.

β€œWe are right. I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at”

JJ Keller. Once a roadside inspection is completed, the officer will close it out.

If violations were discovered, most officers as a courtesy will explain the violations to the driver. If there were any out-of-service violations, the officer will normally explain what must be done to get the out-of-service order lifted. Drivers need to be very attentive during this part of the inspection. The driver also needs to read and understand the complete inspection report. The driver has 24 hours to get the roadside inspection report to the motor carrier.

If the driver will not be returning to a company facility within the next 24 hours, the driver needs to know to get it on the way to you via email, mail, or fax within 24 hours. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and dairy McNamara. [ Music ]

We're what I'm ready to do. He's our cronion. I'm hearing McNamara. You know, the one thing when you look back and in here, we know Scott Kelly is lying when he said he didn't know Barry Weiss was, because it was the biggest media story for a significant period of time for over a year. I mean, it was, and it's still huge today. You know,

β€œwhen we're purchasing it and then starting the Twitter files and then remember, how many reports”

did Barry Weiss put out? How many installments of the Twitter file were there? Oh, man, at one, two, three, four, ten, fifteen, twenty installments of the Twitter files. It seems we were getting a new one all the time. Right, we're released between December and March of 2023. It was a story that was out there every single day. And Democrats, as we talked about when the hearings took place, you know, that the personal attacks on, you know, on Taibi

and Shellenberger, and then Shellenberger get her, which I forgot which one got the visit from the IRS agents at the house that the day he was testifying. Wow, from Kelly to say he didn't know it. Yeah, who she was. He's lying, buddy.

Hey there.

you don't control your money, you're not in control of your finances and you have to look

β€œoutside of yourself to believe the life that you want, you're not in control of your life,”

like, what is it that you actually want? Money should follow the dreams and goals, because sometimes you make the dream and go the money and you've overworked yourself and you've exceeded what you've needed for the actual thing you want. Sometimes we forget like, what's the actual thing you want? A Ford anything, follow and listen on your favorite platform. I write from the rate of feedback to the studio. We're running our video. He's

early and I'm hearing that American inflation numbers have come out. And by the way,

β€œMr. President, what not to say when an inflation report comes out, I love inflation.”

Yeah. Even if you say because when the war is over, it will come down. You never say the words, I love inflation because it will be used against every Republican

coming up in November. Yep. Yep. Yep. The second half of that will never be right put in the

ads. It's the first half. And even though their side said it and tried to promote inflation is a good thing when it was over 9% and saying, that means people are spending more money. It's one of the reasons they lost. Yeah. One of the major reasons they lost. Yeah. Again, this is politics 101. Yeah. And I'm sorry for people that say, well, Trump's not a politician. He is now. Yes. I thought we were beyond that. Yeah. Yeah. We're probably happy. The words never to say politics 101. You never say

the words. I love inflation. Yeah. No. I love the inflation. You never say those words.

Ever. No. No. No. No. Yeah. Yeah. But the he finished it up doesn't matter. Yeah. You say no. We all hate inflation. But right? You say inflation is transitory. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, you don't say that. Well, in this case, you actually could say that it's temporary based on the war. Do not say it's true. Do not use the word transitory. Stay away from any T word as a result of our efforts in Iran, which will have a long-term benefit, which will mean a safe and prosperous

United States. This is only temporary. And I'm telling you right now, it's going to be great. And we're going to take care of Iran, which gets us to the comments on Iran and the actions against the rich will get to in a minute here. But I just want to, let me just get to the problem.

β€œI think it was the Babylon be that had the headline. Let me just check here.”

By the way, I just don't know if I actually made update state flag with swastika and it's a state main state flag with swastika. Yeah. Where was it yesterday? It was, I don't maybe it's not on the page. Maybe they just had it as a, you know, on social media, but it was people still looking for the benefit of the Iran war. That was a Babylon be headline. And again, I said that because Babylon be is a Christian pro-Trump. Yeah. And I did, they're not anti-Trump at all. No, parity

websites. So I saw that yesterday on my go boy. But when you look at it, just get to look at the inflation numbers and then we'll get dug to all the the Iran stuff. The consumer price index increased 4.2% last year relative to a year earlier, the highest annual inflation rates since April of 23 and an increase from 3.8% in April 60% of it though because of energy prices. Yeah. Okay. So you look at it and you can say, all right, there are, you know, the economically

Speaking the economists looked at it and said, well, really can't get anythin...

the energy prices are so much of it. Right at the moment, I don't care about it's not the

economic issues. It's number one to me. It's the political issue of how this will hurt you

β€œin November. And that's why when he said, I love the inflation. It's like, oh, God, please, just”

shut up. But when you look at it, food from home still up 2.7% food away from home up 3.5%. That's interesting because food away from home normally the last couple of months has been lower than food at, you know, food at home. That's been lower. Yeah, there have been some fast food menu adjustments. I think during that period, which is why that may have happened. Energy up 23.5% gasoline, 40.5% of course, electricity, 5.9%. Pipe gas, 3%. Apparel, you know, you look at it now as we get,

we get closer to, you know, I mean, with schools ending, for example, just is ending on the East coast. It's been out for a few weeks. But still, you've got over the summer looking for school stuff, apparel, a 4.8% rent of primary residents, 2.9%. New vehicles and use cars down. That's because are not selling. You saw the OEMs a couple of weeks ago said, expect a bad year. Yeah, you had motor vehicle maintenance and repair, 6.1%. Motor vehicle insurance up 6.1%. Airfare 26.7%.

Medical care services, 3.8% and so you look at those numbers and you can show up the numbers and say this, you know, you take out the energy prices and it's not that bad economically speaking, you can say that if the hypothetically, if the war ends in a month and gasoline prices come down, my major concern right now is I said, everything I'm focused on is I want the Republicans to win. Any criticism I have towards Republicans and the administration is

based on one thing. Now, I thought I want the Democrats to win. I want the Republicans to win. And it seems like at times they are not as focused as the members of their party wish them to be. You know, I'm thinking in my mind looking at the calendar,

β€œif you're going to do what needs to be done and complete the mission and around, which I believe”

should include two main items and that is checking the regime out and then getting the securing and getting and keeping the uranium. That two tier mission, I'm thinking to myself. I mean, you probably could do it in eight weeks, but I don't know. That seems like a short period

for me, but let's just say you could do it in eight weeks. That still basically gets you to

admit August, price to start dropping on energy late August, the driving season will be ending in late August. And then you start seeing then the energy prices because of heating oil, just natural demand would come back as the months start to cool. But the point would be is that if you could get that mission done, you might be able to settle the markets, but I don't even know if you have that kind of time. Even if you could get the mission done in eight

weeks, you're asking for the public to have the perception of I saw gas at 313 the other day. And I paid 320, which is really a dollar lower than it was. Yeah. And so, and the president, in fact, told us yesterday why that was, right, they have been sneaking oil, through the straight of Hormus all along in a rand just discovered it. And so the supply, and he said it was millions of barrels a day. So if, you know, if the supply again, if there was this

plot, I total of 100 million barrels, which would be five days supply for the United States. Right.

And if you're looking at that, you know, that effort. If there was some kind of offshore glut or whatever

β€œwhich has happened, you know, I, I didn't hear anything like that, but this was a secret of mission.”

He said, no lights on the freighters, nothing. So he said a rand found out about it or they'd still be

Doing it.

of Hormus. The downpilets is one thing. But beyond that, you've got to control a rand. You've got to

control the regime. You've got to, and you've got to get the mission done. There is, there is no, there's, there's no discussion. There is no deal to be pad with a rand. No one believes that. And the administration knows that. So trying to kick the can until November 3rd is a futile effort. You're going to have to have a two-tier mission. You take out the regime and you get control of all of the uranium. And I don't know what that can be done right now. I'm just throwing this out.

β€œThat's in order to complete conquering a rand. That's what you're going to have to do.”

And then, of course, maintain the straighted Hormus. Look, the, the president yesterday said what, uh, the biggest supporters of what he has done, you know, initially what he did in a rand, have been saying all along. In fact, if you look at the New York Post editorial, which we read on the area yesterday, the New York Post editorial said his, you know, his, the Trump advisors need to stop, you know, having the United States look like

suckers. And the president said yesterday, he said those words. Yeah. A rand is playing us for suckers, which means they're playing you for a sucker. Yeah. Because you're the only one that matters. You're, you're the guy, but it's all that. You're so, yeah. So Trump came out and said they're playing me for a sucker, which is exactly. And so everything that he has been saying, all the 38 times that the New York Post actually counted that he has said we're close to a deal was all BS

They're of it. They were stalling. If if you were helping them, if you were stalling and believing the talks were going anywhere, you were helping them do whatever that was. Yeah. By the way, by the way, I'm saying a rand was was BSing. You're not BSing. If you believe it, if you, if, if Trump believe it. Well, it's, and I don't know whether here's my point. Did Trump really believe it? Or was he just doing that politically? Because he was trying, he thought it was

politically adventacious to keep promoting it, even if he knew we weren't close to a deal.

It's, it's hard to know. And, and I thought for the first few weeks, this gives you room for a very

β€œI think a very important intel mission. Let the dust settle. But we're so far past that.”

Now, it is a rant had time to according to reports and satellite photos. Start to dig out the rubble of those missile sites and possibly make progress at getting the uranium. Now, it's been told by the administration. And I think a couple of people in the media said, well, they can't, they don't have the equipment to get all the uranium. I don't know that. I don't know what equipment they're being supplied by China, by Russia.

The Israelis have been hanging out in Azerbaijan with troops there. That was discovered. And that's

the lamp basically, the land between Russia and Iran. You have to go through Azerbaijan. If you're

going to move by land. And so that, you know, it's hard to know what's going on and what they're

β€œbeing supplied with, what Iran has. I think, again, the first few weeks, it's heavy intel mission”

to find out what's left when the dust settles. But if you, if you do believe that they're at the table and they want a meaningful deal, first of all, you're a sucker to believe it, that they would ever abide by the deal. Right. Because I'll write a deal. I'll put it on on paper and then just you know, okay, all right. Well, now it's going to be 60 days or 90 days where we come to a, you know, a ceasefire, remember, because it was a ceasefire and then a peace deal, 60 to 90 days down the road

or whatever, and they're like, fine, we'll just keep breaking it all the way then. Right. And that's that's the whole point. Even when the president said, because it seemed like he was becoming out strong yesterday, you know, and then it was like, I got a call. They called me directly and they're ready to deal and they better, otherwise we bomb the ass out of them tomorrow. No, no. And it's just like, you know, they're, they're extending. They're extending. They're extending. They're extending. That there's no

deal to be had. Right. Take out the regime. All there is is the United States setting the terms and verifying it. Yeah. And the regime has to be gone because even if we have the uranium, the regime

Is going to fund if you let them play in the oil game, they're going to fund ...

Which then you know, the attack in the United States. Yes, we are right. I radio coming up more with

β€œGary McNamara and Eric Carley, it's Red Eye Radio.”

We are when I radio and he's our running on. Gary McNamara, just a real quickly looking at the the latest reports of what might be going on over, you know, overnight. And there was, you know, some of the reports that was it over, you know, over Israel and Jordan, whatever that there were other, you know, missiles and things like that. Right. And I'm reading that on, on X, you know, I haven't

seen and just went to Fox News haven't seen an update on it, but we'll do some research on that to

find out the latest on that because as we know, even after the, and by the way, those helicopter pilots, you read the story and that they were off a lucky. The drone, the explosives and the drone

β€œdidn't blow up. Yeah. Right. The helicopter right between them. Right. Yeah. And so that story is,”

you know, that's wild. It was was was wild. So it's going to be interesting to see what happens in the next 36 hours.

Cafe in your best form, with the new Cuba One capsule machine from Chibu. In

every Cuba capsule, you can see from special answers. For espresso, coffee creamer or coffee creamer, or coffee creamer, or knofftruck. The new Cuba One, with premium design, compact cruiser and small one-sticks price up to 29 euros. Thank innovative press broot technology, with every tassel besonders aromatic with sampled creamer. And that is now the Cuba capsule machine in their Chibu fjale and of Chibu DE.

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley, talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America. We are Red Eye Radio and he is here at Crowley and I'm Gary McNamara, welcome in good morning. Hello. Yeah, wasn't the best day for the president, then he looks like

he's backing off on, and a poultry is ahead of DNI. He's just too much pressure on that when coming from his own party on that. I have no idea why he picked him. Well, I could do it. And there's the part of the discussion is whether the DNI is even an office that needs to be in the federal government. Well, you know, you have 18 Intel agencies and my question would be, I mean, we have

β€œleaders of those other Intel agencies. John Radcliffe is doing a good job, I think, at CIA,”

and I naturally thought they would ask Radcliffe. But what I just said may have overqualified him, which is to say they need him at the CIA more than they need him as DNI. And is the DNI has it become more of a clerical position? I don't think that it is, but do you need, yeah, do you actually need that position filled? I don't know, man. And many of the GOP thought the nominee wasn't, wasn't qualified, and so it looks like they're backing off.

We'll see who the next nominee is, I guess. But like I said, when he said yesterday, I just, I love the inflation. Doesn't matter what he said afterwards, the Democrats will use that all the way up to the election. You want to offer a Republican? Here it is. We love inflation, just like the Republican used the whole transitory thing against, you know, against Biden, and everything about inflation back then, just a horrible move. And then when we come to the, you know, the, you know,

the, the Warren Iran yesterday with a president really verified what every critic that has been on

His side has said when he said, yeah, they're, they're playing us for suckers.

me for a sucker. Yeah. And, and he made it sound like he's not going to allow himself to do that again.

But then he said, they called me. They called when we did it, they called me and it's like, if there's not a deal, well, then we'll bomb the S out of them tomorrow. Don't try and walk

β€œthe fence for the, for the markets if that's your approach. If that's what you're trying to accomplish.”

Well, the, the, the, the fact is when, and I didn't count it when the near post came out and said, we've been close to a deal 38 times. Like, okay, no wonder, everybody's tired about it. No wonder, it's almost like, you know, crying wolf. You, you say it so much that we're here, we're here, and you're not there. And then this all happens. And then you go back and say, well, they call this.

So now there weren't that now there's serious about doing it. And it's like, no. And when we even

looked at the deal that they talked about a few weeks ago, which was, okay, not a, not a peace deal yet, but a ceasefire, and then whatever it was. And then 60 days or a interterminate amount of time. I don't know what the exact amount of time would have been. In order to have a peace deal, you know, to get rid of the, you know, the, the nuclear weapons. And everybody went stalling.

β€œAnd now, he said yesterday, they've been playing me all along. Yeah. And it's like that's what”

everybody on your side has not, not the opposition. Everybody on your side has been telling you this. And you know, why is that? Why have you allowed yourself to be played by the Iranians? It's not like they were trustworthy before the war. No, there was no reason they were going to be trustworthy. Now, no matter how much you bomb the S out of them. And, and then when, you know, this beginning of this week, when he went after Israel, for defending themselves, right?

He said Israel's not the problem. When he was trying to make the moral equivalency or trying to make the case that both both sides Israel and Iran need to stop fighting as if the United States was in part of it. These are all bizarre statements that don't make any sense. And as, you know, and then when our helicopter is attacked, it's like, okay, we're going to go in and we're going to strike back. Well, you're telling Israel, not just strike back. And you're striking back. And they're

hitting, you know, they're hitting their own country. Right. They're hitting places within their own country. And it's just, again, it's become a cluster here where you initially had clarity as to what the president wanted. Yeah. And now you don't know. Yeah, but the one thing is, you know, well, what is Iran want? Iran wants to stretch this out as long as possible or like the alien in Independence Day through the glass. I want you to tell him,

uh, what do you want for us? I want you to die. Yeah. I mean, if you ask Iran what they want that to America, that's, they've been screaming. Is anybody not paying attention to 47 years? It's not like they started screaming that, uh, in March. And, and one of the things being asked by the president's supporters, what do you want? What would you view as the deal? When the president said, but 10 days ago, uh, well, they've given us, uh, well, Iran's given us

our guarantee. They want to get rid of it. It means nothing. Nothing. Not stop talking, guarantees are a deal. Start talking about how you will verify everything because that's the only

β€œthing that matters is the verification of it. And then you have to explain to your own party”

that if they agree to a deal that you'll allow the money to start flowing again that will go right back to the proxies that will be used to attack the United States. That's why the mission has to be a two-tier approach. The, the regime has to be gone. And we have to have the uranium. Well, that's what the president stated his goal was in the eight-minute speech. Yep. And then afterwards talked about the only thing acceptable is unconditional surrender. There is no deal in an unconditional

surrender. Now, one of the things, as we've criticized with this president, whether it came, you know, domestically, the doge checks and the tariff checks and everything else, we said, don't over promise

and under deliver. Don't do it. Well, and on, on national defense. Don't ever do it. Never do

that. No. Because you come off as we can everything falls on you, everything, all the bucks stop with you. You're commander and chief. And you get all the credit for taking a ran out and taking the old Iotola out. But if you don't finish the job, you get zero credit for any of it. Uh, Trump needs a new Iran strategy, editorial board wall street journal. After weeks of insisting to deal with Iran as a round the quarter, President Trump may be admitting the reality.

The regime is tapping the U.

diplomacy a chance, but they keep playing us for suckers. That's a quote from the president yesterday.

β€œHe added, is Mr. Trump ready. It last for a new approach for nine weeks. The ceasefire has led”

Iran dictate events in the Gulf. The regime gets to start each skirmish, shooting at U.S. forces, U.S. allies or commercial ships, then decides when the exchange ends. Iran also has used Hezbollah to fire on Israel, only to cite the resulting fighting in Lebanon as an excuse to stall talks with the U.S. Each prior Iranian attack has sent Mr. Trump racing to deescalate. This means meant force forcing ceasefires in Lebanon and then blaming Israel when Hezbollah kept

on shooting or playing down Iranian fire on U.S. troops as a trifle-meritene love taps in reply. Iran's large strike on the Kuwaiti's airport was not a big deal, Mr. Trump said. He said the same of Iran's Sunday strike on Israel urging it not to reply since the missiles didn't hurt anybody. That logic leads to trouble. Only by a miracle did two U.S. pilot survive after an Iranian drone struck and burned inside the Apache helicopter near the state of Hormuzan

Monday. Yeah, Mr. Trump's early reaction was to say this too, quote, it wasn't a big deal. Criticize the idea of returning to war and have the U.S. central command announced that its response would be proportional. Send com says it hit 20 air defense targets on Tuesday and Iran fired back in the Gulf. Given Israel had also hit reconstituted Iranian air defenses that combined effort could prepare for something larger, Mr. Trump limited

Israel's strikes and previewed his own in public. When the U.S. says proportional, Iran hears weak as we said yesterday, offering the regime such forward guidance signals that Mr. Trump still fears a return to war. Iran may reply with greater force if he strikes again as a president said he would do as early as Wednesday night. Mr. Trump won't want to hear it, but he has been dancing to Iran's tune. He will have to break from it or go down as losing the

war politically despite the early military gains. It's not too much to say, Mr. Trump faces similar choices, the one that Bush faced in Iraq in 2006, 2007. The insurgency was winning and Mr. Bush needed to ship to strategy or accept defeat. He chose the surge that broke the insurgency and the U.S. was able to maintain influence in Iraq in that region. Mr. Trump had hoped for Iranian concessions, but he abandoned much of his leverage by showing he would not continue a return

to war. Iran's regime has taken advantage as Mr. Trump now acknowledges the President also said

Wednesday that a U.S. secret mission since May has helped 200 ships and 100 million barrels of oil

escape the straight-of-war moves. We took out the other 22 ships late at night with no lights.

β€œThat's why oil is $85 a barrel. That's progress and essentially a resumption of project freedom”

while the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports imposes severe costs on the regime, but the straightest still largely closed to commercial shipping, some 130 transit, some 130 ships went through the Hormuz each day pre-war. There you go. The way for Mr. Trump to write the ship is to go on offense and that means more pounding Iran. So there you go. So you can sit there and criticize the critics of the President, but the President just verified that the critics that were pro-Trump

and pro-Aran were actually correct and how do we know that because the President said it

yesterday? Well, he basically quoted the New York Post. Yeah. So there you have it. I mean, you

and I have been looking at this. Everybody, I think some of our listeners believe we have an insider or we're insiders at the White House because we say something and quite often something happens the next day, but all we're doing is observing reality. That's all we're doing. This isn't hard. And understanding the reality of Iran and these logic, she had mentality. You and I mean, this is for 47 years. This isn't new stuff. No. And I don't want to, you know,

β€œand honestly, almost like erasing everything up until recently with what he's saying about Iran”

and and and stalls and the 38 times of saying they've got a deal. And then saying I love inflation

Made you wonder if Joe Biden's back in control.

It was it was it wasn't not been a week for the president. You cannot have that.

β€œAnd you have to go to work and complete the mission because you can't afford to lose your base.”

If they're not motivated, we've seen that before. At the GOP base, the rank and file voter is not motivated in November. If they have no confidence, they won't show up. We've seen that before. We don't want that. I want the GOP to win. And even then if they win, you're still going to have a ton of challenges because you're not going to have a super majority in the house or the Senate. So you have to start with the win and you cannot piss off your base. Stop. No, this is

national security. And as we've seen and you know it because you don't see online. Right. You know, and that's where, you know, the influencers. Right. Nobody is saying, you know, they may say now if Trump goes back in. Yeah. Good, you know, good for you. Right. But nobody there has I haven't seen one influencer. And these influencers are the cheerleaders of the president on anything that he does. Right. They've been completely quiet for the last week.

Yep. Last couple of weeks really on a rant. Right. We are right. I radio this morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by house products tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. The importance of value added in a trade and US ag producers at Ag industry's bottom line. When it comes to value at an export opportunities, they're unlimited. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins Wednesday testified before the Senate Agriculture Committee. She notes ethanol made

from court as a prime example of value added. As several foreign markets have bio-fueled demand from consumers and regulatory objectives sat down with some ethanol buyers in England. And as so many of these countries, whether we agree with them or not, but they have put themselves into a certain category of reaching certain numbers on carbon, et cetera. It is our farmers in America

β€œthat will be, I believe, the most benefited from those rules around the world. We're already”

going to break records this year on corn exports, ethanol exports are going to break records, but I think it's just the beginning of the opportunity. I'm Rod Bay in reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senax fuels and loops. , and look, the danger for this president because he is the leader of the Republican Party is when he ran. People looked at him and said, "People voted for him because

they said, "This guy cares about the working man." Yeah. Right. Yeah. And that's where, you know, he cares about Americans, he cares about the, remember the whole thing. Trump relates more to the construction worker than the actual, you know, the CEO's, that's who he really relates to. Yep.

β€œAnd that was, that's how he came really came to prominence here. You cannot, if that's,”

if that's been your brand, you can't sit there and say, "Oh, I love the inflation."

You can't. You just can't never say those words. No matter what you say,

afterwards, it doesn't matter. That doesn't disarm any. Right. You can't do that. No. And, you know, and when he's talking about ballrooms or going to Nick Games, or, you know, that, you know, I'm going to have another rally, or what was the other one? I think what was the other one that he was talking about. You come across as going, you care more about, you care more about the imagery of being president than actually what

you said you wanted to do for us. That's the danger that he is creating. And I want Republicans to win and I want Trump to be successful. None of it comes as anybody knows from the fact that we don't want them to be successful. No. I want you to win. I don't want the GOP to win to keep the GOP in power necessarily as much as I want them to give him the power to finish his

agenda on a number of things. And I noticed it was second term. Don't hold you. I've see fight

at the White House. Yeah. Stop it. Yeah. Stop it. Nobody gives a damn about that. Right. Stop it. I mean, just stop it. You're coming off. That's what I think stop coming off as an elitist.

You did the opposite.

you cared about the success of the small guy. And now you're saying inflation doesn't matter

β€œand look at all the things that we're doing to have fun. Stop it. You have to finish on national”

defense. You have to finish the job. There is no half measure. Yeah. There is no half measure. And you can't pause it because of an election you'll lose your base. Yeah. You're finding that out very quickly. There's no deal to be had with Iran. None. The regime has to be gone. We need the uranium in our hands. Period. And I don't believe that's going to be a short term. Thing. Well, because we don't know how deep the ties were told with the 4,000. It could be

10,000. It could be a 100,000. But in order to do that. In order to do that,

β€œdon't you have to get rid of the regime. It's like, you know, they've already said we've had”

regime change. Well, yeah, to what the exact same thing. Yeah. It's my whole point. It's exact same people. So you need to you need to kill this level of God. If you're talking about succeeding,

you had to kill the first level of government the second, the third, the fourth, the fifth,

the sixth, the seventh. No, the entire regime has to be gone by stopping as he did 10 weeks ago. The loyalist rise to the top. You can't have any loyalist standing period. You can't. Because remember, your goal was unconditional surrender from them. Yep. He said it. We did. And he is a curling iron. I'm Gary McNamara coming up in just a minute. The gestating parent back and back in the news again. I mean, up in just a minute. For 200 and 50 years Americans have

believed in one powerful idea that we were meant to live free, free to work hard, free to move, free to enjoy life without being held back. But if pain is holding you back, are you really free? I got to tell you, I cannot thank the people that really factor enough. They gave me some of their product to try. So I'm time ago and I've been taking it every day. It's made a real

difference in my life. And I really never thought about the fact that when eggs and pains keep

β€œyou from doing things, you're really not living a truly free life. You have to limit yourself.”

Don't limit yourself. Try really factor. And we've heard from so many people that you know with their three week quick start, about two thirds or so go on to order more. And it's right now a very special patriotic price for that three week quick start. We're talking by the way a drug free option, a very easy option for you. And that patriotic price to get you started is just 1776, 17 dollars and 76 cents. So you can order your three week quick start right now at 1776,

relieffactor.com 800, the number four relief, relieffactor.com or 800, the number four relief. You know, we did get some great when we talked about the whole just-dating parent thing. Okay, I got to go back and find, we got some of our listeners had some great, oh yeah, they had some great stuff on it, but it's it's back again. Okay. Officials in America's most populated township or taking urgent action to stop a Democrat back bill in New York state that would replace

mother and father with gender neutral parental terms. The emergency resolution from Hemstead Township comes just days after the New York state legislature passed a bill that would replace mother with the term just-dating parent and father with non-just-dating parent. It would also change paternity to parentage. Democrats say the measure is an effort to be more inclusive of the state's residents with non-traditional gender identities. It is now waiting action from Democrat Governor

Kathy Holkel and to show you how important that was.

what about a week ago and she just said, well, I don't know about the bill and we'll all decide

β€œthat later on and she wouldn't answer the question. You know, if you were to take this to the”

national level to the federal level, that would mean that on our biggest of bombs we'd have to change that to the just-dating parent of all bombs. You couldn't call it the mobile. That it just complicates so many things. By the way, it's just stupid. Let's start with reality. It's just stupid.

Why, you just-dating parent, f-word. That's right. I said that when we first did this story.

That's going to change one curse word dramatically. Yes. It will take the impact out of it, dramatically. As Mitch Headburg used to say, you can't have an argument in a tent because you can't slam the flap shut. Well, you're going to take all of the steam out of that one curse word. Hemstead Township supervisor John Ferretty told Fox News digital. The legislation is

β€œwoke nonsense. As a father at two, it was an insult to me and to my wife. Ferretty said in an”

interview, as soon as I learned, the first thing I did was bring my wife into our bedroom and said, look what they did up in Albany. They're eliminating the terms mother and father from state law. That's not very romantic. His nine-year-old daughter overheard the conversation and got upset, asking her non-just-dating parent. Can I still call you dad? It really hit close to home. He continued. We need to take a stand in the town of Hemstead. The largest township in America

and make sure- I'm not really sure what that means by the way. And make sure that we make it clear because it's been said over and over again in this article. The largest township in America, okay. And make sure that we make it clear to not just the residents of the town of Hemstead, but to residents throughout New York State, that we won't stand for this kind of well-known sense. While the 2026 legislative session ended last week, Hulkel has until the end of the year to sign

the bill in the law. Hulkel told reporters last week, she had not yet reviewed the proposal, because this had taken a lot, you know, the review of it. I mean, mother, just-dating parent, father, non-just-dating parent. That's it. Pretty simple. I need to review this, and I need to study this, and we need to-we need to all get together with a group of my advisors and take a little bit of a blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

She really tries hard to walk that fence. It's not that hard. See, I don't have her for a while,

because I'm from that area. Then you never have to, you know, just the thing, she-she-she-may-she-may-be-dumber-than-scot-pelly.

You know, I don't want to be sexist here. You know, I did the kind of nothing to do. There's got nothing to do with, you know, whether-that-the fact that she's a, you know, just-dating person, and he's a non-just-dating person. Or whether she's passed her prime as non-limit would say, "We wouldn't say that." Right. He said it. Right. He asked the question one time or made a comment. She passed her prime as she passed her-we wouldn't-that would be wrong. I would just say,

she's old. This-this-this. I'm not by the way, that's not unfair. I mean, you know, because you just have been thrown at it her, because she's a woman, you've thrown at it me many times. Yeah, you know what,

β€œmy old people are? They're old. We call them old people. Well, why don't you call me something else?”

Because you look at things like that. I don't know. I don't hear an old person or a dead. You know, they turn it around. I'm happy that you're old. I don't think you're past your prime. I keep hoping

you get better. There's always room for improvement. Look,

I don't know. She's past her prime. I know she's old. She's some older than her. Yeah, how old she? 67. Yeah, she's old. She's a senior. She's old. It's okay to say that. She's a senior. She's old. We don't bring- We don't bring anything into it except the one-old the capacity of their mind. She may not be past her prime. I think the people in New York are hoping it gets better. The supervisor said the emergency resolution in Hemstead is intended

to ensure the town continues to recognize a term. Mother and father in its own laws and policies, regardless of whether the state measure ultimately becomes law. We're taking a stand because we will

Not allow woke Democrat liberals in New York State and the New York State leg...

erase a traditional family. They did not pass a law that adds language. They passed a law that

β€œerases mother and father from certain statutes under New York State law and then it's completely”

unacceptable. If all many wants to add additional language to their state laws, they could have added additional language and we would not be discussing this right now. Instead, they chose to erase mother and father and replace it and we won't stand for that. Yeah, right. So the resolution is guarded support among Republican lawmakers representing Nassau County, including the assembly minority leader and and others, which in New York State

really means deadly and squat. Exactly. Republicans, thank you. Yeah. As in Kathy Hockel's New York, mom is now defined as gestating parent. Well, as one legislators said, the fight marks the latest cultural flashpoint involving Hemstead of Republican letdown ship of roughly, oh, no wonder it's a township of 800,000 residents in Long Island. That's the country's largest township. I agree. All right. No,

no, not on the right 90 minutes. Well, not that impresses me. 800,000. Now that you are the largest. I don't know if I'm going to have a town larger than 800,000. Well, can they shouldn't they graduate to cityship? Yeah. And within Nassau County, Hemstead officials previously back measures including a push to keep biological males from competing in girls and women sports. So there you go. But yeah, that's wow, what idiots. But the point is they're not going to stop, which is

why we are so passionate and critical of Republicans and the administration when they do something

that we believe could result in them losing in November. Yeah. Because the other side on the issues are insane. They're so much stuff that you can put in your ads. It's so much material to just build your ads. Them and their own words. All you need is an editor. A 10 year old YouTuber could put your ads together. Yeah. I'm looking at this here. I said Maggie McNeely with concern women for America legislative action committee. It's just absurd, but also inherently dehumanizing

it reduces women to just their reproductive organs. But women are so much more than that. They're individuals with unique abilities and capabilities. And yes, motherhood is one of the greatest things that a woman can be being a mother is an incredible gift. No, I mean, she hits it right there. That's the point. Mom isn't just about giving birth. You know, I told the story last week about a week ago, maybe a little longer than that. I talked to an old boss of mine who's a

liberal, but always said I'm not a crazy liberal when I work from decades ago. And I told a

little editorial control and everything else. He hired me. He's the one that hired me. He like what

β€œI, he, you know, he said he because your audience likes you. That's why hired me. And this goes”

back a long time ago. But we got into a conversation. We don't very often. I mean, we never really got into a political conversation, you know, since we really worked together. And he just started adding me on about, you know, this is a messaging back and forth. And I was just, you know, playing with them whatever. And he goes, what do you think? What do you think? You know, because he was saying, you know, would I vote for Taloreco over Paxton? And I said, no, I go, look, here's why I'm

going for a Democrat. And I laid it all out. And I put, and I think, number one, when I said identity politics is the racism of the Democratic Party, the institutionalized racism, and the radical transgender movement is as misogynist and sexist as anything that I've ever seen.

β€œIn my life. And, and I said, you, you've basically the misogyny. And, and I think he really got”

upset. I think I really got him upset. And I told him when I don't like about Republicans and what I disagree with the administration about. Because I'm, you know, I, I tell people what I believe. I don't care what party you're in. Right. If you're wrong, you're wrong. Yeah.

And we can have the debate whether I'm right. As, as we always do, whether I'm right or

you're right or we're both right or whatever. But the, the, the fact is, I've never seen and, and I dare anybody, you know, to defend and say what the Democrats have done with the radical transgender movement isn't the most misogynist and sexist thing that has happened in this country in, I don't know, maybe 80 years when it comes to women. Yeah.

It's absolutely horrible what they have done.

But I laid out, you know, where I stand on the issues and where I disagree with both parties,

β€œbut where I agree with both parties and the fact that I will still always vote Republicans”

because of the insanity of those issues with the Democrats. And he just goes, wrote something, then, but an hour later, he wrote back to me goes, did you just cut and paste that

because that just sounds like, you know, mega doctrine? I'm just going, oh my God, he's angry.

Yeah, for all these years, he still doesn't get what you do for a living. Yeah, he doesn't, no,

β€œhe doesn't, he doesn't, he was, I, no, I think I got to him because I accused the party that he”

supports of institutionalizing racism, misogyny and sexism, which is what Democrats believe they're

completely against, yet it's exactly what they're for. He should listen to the show. Yeah,

I agree. We only mandate that you listen every night, the entire show every night. That's all we care, care about. And listen to the replay because there may be something you miss. So,

β€œlisten to the podcast during the day. If you stay up all night, if you can't stay up all night,”

quit your job. But it's right there. It reduces women to just to re-productive organs. And we've seen, like I said, the radical transgender movement is even worse than this. Yeah. Right. Complete total misogyny and sexism. Yep. We are Rudd, I radio. We'll be right back with more Rudd, I radio with Eric Hurley and Gary McNamara. We're Rudd, I run you away. These are crumbling, I'm Gary McNamara. I see Steven A Smith and the president are going back and forward. Yeah,

added. Steven A Smith said the president should have gone to the next game last week and then boom, it's been, yeah, back and forward from the latest one called him a low IQ individual and not that smart. And just for entertainment purposes, I would like to get two of them in the same room together. Oh, I'd love that. I'd love that. Hey, if you can do a deal with the radians, you could do a deal with Steven A Smith. Come on. Yeah, oh my god. That would be fun. And where

would it be? He's an arrogant fool and a low IQ individual. He's been of Steven A Smith. I'd love that to happen, just put both them in a room and go. Yeah, that's the cage match they should have at the White House. Oh, there you go. Yeah, just have a big debate fast. This is Rudd, I radio on Westwood One.

Compare and Explore