"Mearfeuer, more intrigued than the Dragon Keren zurΓΌck.
"The absolute macht is to drive you."
β"Then Reich wird unbezwing was a winner."β
"Stream, the new Staffel, House of the Dragon, at 22nd June, with wow." "Freudig outer dem of Staffel 1 and 2, the following series." "And another highlight."
"It's not a second question."
"Been the guy to have fun in the world." "Brahem heiΓ, to best prize." "Now at 2, 8, 90 months." "Gear of Worte for the E." "Streaming" was also not so "wow."
"Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio."
"All across America, we are Red Eye Radio, he is here currently and I'm Gary McNamara." "Hello."
β"Thank you for being here this morning."β
"Thank you."
"All right, so let's start off the show listing to Senator Kennedy."
"You know what they used to do?" "You know what they used to do?" "You know what it's interesting?" "The other day I thought I was reading some show prep and organizing some things at the house, and I was thinking to myself, you know, there are days when I could go without
hearing from any of them." "You know, it was one of my throw-all-the-bounds-out moments." "And then I said, "Except Senator Kennedy." "Because I was thinking in the mode of, you know, we talked to one point, not to delay this too far.
But at one point about having, you know, any of them on, you know, the show, if you're going to have them on, interview them, "Man, I would love to sit down and do a full show with no one just, just Senator Kennedy.
It would be the most entertaining, and then maybe informative shows."
"You weren't delaying things too far in your, just so you know, you're the co-host of the show." "Huh? What? When did that happen?
You can, you can say any of that." "I get a, did I get a promotion?" "You don't have to put a disclaimer in there." "Well, I know you got your button ready, and when your button's over, you got a button ready."
"No, no, it's not." "But we love Kennedy. We love, but Senator, he's one of the candidates we do love." "But here he is on a ran and day drinking." "Okay, here we go, all right.
All right."
β"Are you confident that Iran is going to give up its nuclear ambitions or do any sort of substance?β
You, what, what, if, if you, unless you are homeschooled by a day drinker, no one's confident that Iran's going to do anything." "Hey, wait, I take offense to that." "I was homeschooled by a day drinker, my uncle Lee. Yeah, no, the way he started it."
"What?" And he said, "How do I push this?" "Well, you know what he's trying to do, he doesn't want to come out and say, "This deal sucks." "Yeah."
"And you can tell he's, I mean, it doesn't know how to approach it." "You know, he, he, of course, has, you know, supported Trump in so many areas. He doesn't want to come out and say, "This thing sucks." "Yeah." "And, you know, the, the, the, we, if, has anyone come out and said that what Bloomberg has
put out is not the MOU, the memorandum of understanding." I have not seen anyone come out and say those are lies, that's a false leak, whatever. You know, I've not seen anybody from the White House say that because if that is and we both read it. "Yeah."
"It's exactly what the leaks were." "Yeah, it's exactly what we've been saying." "It's exactly what others are saying." "And the only defense when I saw, you know, uh, uh, JD Vance out there promoted it yesterday on, on the view, he keeps, he keeps saying, he keeps bringing up a straw man that nobody's
talking. Tax payer dollars are not going for this. I don't know anybody who was saying that." "No, it was like his ambition was to go out and do make that one point." "Yeah."
"Over the last couple of days." "And, and, and nobody is making the point that taxpayer dollars are going into it.
The problem is, is the deal itself sets up funding that will allow them, Iran...
their proxies all over again, you know, and this, uh, the one near post version of the story.
Lifting of the sanctioned stamp rarely, and in the framework, they use the word framework in the near post, and it wasn't a quote, they used it, and I thought to myself, this is just getting stupid. This is getting beyond stupid. We have been here before with the other side in the White House.
We've been here before I would have bet you any amount of money after we bombed their nuclear sites after we took out the Ayatollah, say in the week after we took out the Ayatollah. If you told me it was going to, this is where it was going. I would have bet you any amount of money you were wrong." "Yeah.
Yep. And then the leaks that were coming out yesterday, CNN had this one, US negotiators are working to quickly release the text of the agreement between Washington and Iran, by the way, no they're not. Even as they downplay the significance of the specific language in the document, US officials
βtold CNN, that's what the US officials told CNN.β
Right. CNN said that they're saying the officials said, "We're working out this," and it's like, "Well, Bloomberg did it. No problem. It's a page and a half."
Right. The officials described the text of the agreement as incredibly vague, mainly intended to create a more favorable environment for a highly technical in-person talks to come. They added that the framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience.
That's what the United States should care about. Additionally, the United States said the text of the memorandum of understanding, which Vice President J.D. vans told CNN Monday is one and a half pages long and we haven't already.
Does not reflect the critical back-channel commitments Iran has made to the United States,
which they argue gave more than more confidence in signing on to the arrangement. The quote, "People should not read too much into the language of the deal." That's what the hell you're saying. Let's see. Are you kidding me?
Don't pay attention to the facts. One of the officials described the agreement as a political document. You know, I don't drink, but I should start day drinking. Actually, day drinking for us would be night drinking. But, quote, "What's more important than the actual document is the understanding we have
βwith each other, and that's why it's important to get it done that we can create an environmentβ
and go on and talk about all these things." Oh, my God. By the way, it's not a political document when we know that Iran is already selling oil. That's not a political document. No.
No, it is. I mean, they're spinning this thing. Look, I agree.
We've always talked about the fact that Democrats believe that Democrats believe that the people
the vote for them are idiots. In this case, with Trump, he believes the people that support him are complete idiots. Yeah. Well, he believes everybody is that idiot. He believes he believes he has had so much power that the people that -- well, remember,
he's the one that said, I could go out and shoot somebody in the street and shoot someone in the street and still win. He believes that he can do anything and his followers will follow him no matter what it is.
βI think he's finding out that's not true.β
I mean, he's getting blasted on Fox news yesterday. Oh, man. You know, preliminary, it was like, well, let's see what's in it. Let's see what's in it. Now, you know, that document is apparently out and then you see the backing off these stories
of backing off. Well, the actual document is a more of a political document. Don't pay attention to what's actually in the document. Pay attention to the back channel discussions that we're having that we can't talk about.
You can't sell that to the American people because that's not what you sold day one on this. You know who you're not seeing everywhere, Marco Rubio, you know. When you're not seeing Marco Rubio everywhere, and I mean, he's been in a couple of he's made a couple of comments, but in a deal like this, if this were a great deal,
Marco Rubio would be out front and that lens, so the fact that he's not lens, I think credibility to the story that, again, if it's true, this lens, credibility to that story that he's not on board, hexeth is an on board. I don't know how many lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the GOP who aren't on board, but that was, this is a cluster, yeah, it is.
This is a cluster.
And I just don't know how it even gets to this point with a ran of all nations. So many left-leaning talk show hosts are saying the taxpayers are going to pay 300 billion to a ran. I heard it myself, I have not heard that because if you're familiar with the Obama thing,
we had always said that the, you know, what was, you know, they, you know, and Biden
lifting the sanctions, right, that was us making sure they couldn't sell their oil money to fund their proxies, I don't know any Republican because the big criticism is coming from Republicans. Right.
βThat's, but that's, in fact, that's what you have to be worried about.β
What the liberals say is not, isn't the concern. Your own group turning on you on this and not, not really turning, they're not the ones doing the turning. The administration's doing the turning, the president's doing the turning. I haven't changed my position on a ran, it seems the president has.
Yeah, this is, this is not an issue of Republicans versus Democrats.
No. This is an issue of Republicans versus Republicans. Yes, yes. Yes. For the Republicans.
What the Democrats are doing? Right. That's, that's a, that's a given, right, but that's not what's driving it. No. No, this is what hurts you in November.
The Republicans stay home. Yeah. If they don't vote for, they're not going to vote for Democrats. Some independence may Republicans won't vote for Democrats, but their damn damn sure will stay home.
Yeah. And so when they say it's not a deal, all of it isn't a deal. I mean, it's not a deal, but no, but there are portions of our a deal because it's already happening. Well, shipments are already happening for them, which means cash is going to Iran.
So that part of the deal is a deal. When for Iran, right.
βAnd here's the thing, too, you know, if this is a political move in the big picture on settlingβ
the markets until November 3rd, what are you going to do if, if they lob one? If Iran decides to step outside of this agreement, memorandum of misunderstanding or whatever it's called, what if they decide to lob one across? Well, are you going to do nothing? Israel's not going to do nothing.
They're going to do something. Well, there is nothing if the Bloomberg, and I've not heard the White House because everybody's now reporting on the 14 point plan that Bloomberg put out yesterday and we've read it, there's nothing in there that even talks about Israel at all, no, there's nothing. So anything that the president says you heard yesterday, well, he's going to keep them from
going after Hezbollah or they've got to leave Lebanon or none of that exist in the plan that we have seen if that is the correct plan, but I think it was Andrew McCarty yesterday that was like, stop this thing of, well, you guys don't know what's in it, well, then don't be promoting it. If you're going to be out promoting it, let people know what's in the deal, you know, don't
said, you know, that, that, that to me is, is absolute BS, you know, presented and defended. This is, this is the text of it. This is what it means and this is what we're going to do. Don't throw out generalities and then when people come back at you and say, well, and the entire point though, as we have said, doesn't matter where the 300 billion comes
from, it's an America is trying to raise $300 billion to revive the Iranian Revolutionary
Guard. No matter how you do it, no matter how you try to sell it, yeah, yeah. You can't sell that to Republicans and I, you know, I just, there was some kind of switch that was flipped and I have no idea how on this because you look at it, if that's correct the 14 points, it says, bad as we originally thought it would be, yes.
And it tells me it gets worse from here. Now, what I thought was really interesting and this was from Andrew Desodario, who's
βthe covers Congress for punchbowl.com, oh, I just had it here, what happened to it?β
Okay, I must have basically it says, the Trump administration might have inadvertently handcuffed its ability to implement key elements of an Iran deal when it sent a previously unreported
Certification to Congress last year that bars much of the broad sanctions rel...
the outline of the memorum of understanding Senator Slip, a provision into the 2024 Ukraine
βsupplemental bill that requires the State Department to tell Congress every 180 days, whetherβ
the IRGC launch drone attacks on Americans, if so, the administration makes that determination, the IRGC cannot be removed from the foreign terrorist organization list for four years. The administration formalized that determination in a report to Congress last April, lifting the Iran's foreign terrorist designation would almost certainly be required to implement the broad sanctions relief.
The administration is outlined under the MOU, permultable senior hill steps, staffers who wrote the bill. Trump can waive the four-year requirement if he tells Congress its vital for national security, but loosening the Iranian Revolutionary Guard sanctions by arguing they should remove be removed from the foreign terrorist list would be a tough sell for Republicans. Yeah, no, that would be an impossible sell for me.
But this gets worse, and sending out sources now to say, don't pay attention to the text. They don't know what to do now, because they're not saying the text is wrong. There's no one that we have seen that says, this is absolutely false what you're saying. What was released. And now they're saying don't pay attention to saying instead don't pay attention to the
text, because we look behind the curtain, because we can't tell you what's going on, because this is so they've already moved the goalposts, the goalposts are already being moved on this. Yeah, we are right, I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller due to safety concerns many
motor carriers have policies that limit her prohibit the use of cruise control.
βYou should only use it in good driving conditions, during daylight hours, and on roadsβ
that have light traffic, few curves or hills, and a consistent speed limit.
Never use cruise control when operating in adverse driving conditions, including wet icy
or slippery roads, during brush hour and heavy traffic or on congested highways at night, or when you're tired or fatigued. You want to be controlling and adjusting your speed as you drive instead of having to suddenly break if you encounter an obstacle. In the case of a slippery road surface, you want to be able to slow your vehicle by not
accelerating instead of using the brakes whenever possible. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates, visit us at JJ Keller.com. We are at our radio, and he is our cronion, I'm hearing Matt Nemera. Thanks so much for being here this morning, just going through two social, it's amazing how little the President talked about the Iran deal.
And that's the second day on the road.
You know, and I don't know if our last call about it, but Iran has agreed to never have
a nuclear weapon, he put this out also the story that the U.S. is paying around $300 million is fake news put up by Democrats. That was actually two days ago that he put that out. Right. There's really the last thing that he put out on social.
Yeah. And as we've said, I haven't heard a Democrat say it, we had a, we had a, somebody on Twitter say it. So I haven't seen everything. I mean, but certainly the criticism was always going to come from Democrats.
The problem is, and they haven't been as vocal as I thought they were, I don't think
they know where to go on this, but the criticism has come from Republicans. That's where the criticism is, and I don't know one Republican who's saying that U.S. taxpayer dollars is going in there now. If you look, if the 14 point deal goes into, you know, is actually what the deal is, or the member of understanding, it doesn't say where the 300 billion comes from.
βHe, he said to Ram put, is it 300 million, or 300 billion?β
300 million. 300 million. 300 million. Yeah. He doesn't, it doesn't say where the money comes from.
It just says investment. Right. He's going to do the investment. Right. What private sector companies are going to say, let's invest in a ran.
Right. Yeah. 300 billion. Yeah. 300 billion, okay, he wrote million here.
CafΓ© in his best form, with the new Cuban one capsule machine from Chibu.
In every Cuba capsule, it's special to have a special offer.
βFor espresso, coffee cream or coffee cream, it's on top.β
The new Cuba one, ΓΌberzeugt with premium design, compact bar cruiser, and small 1st price of $9.20 euro. Thank innovative press-blue technology would every tassel besonders aromatic, with some digger creamer. And there are the Cuba capsule machines in their Chibu fiale and on Chibu D.E.
A perfect free-length tag. Sonne. Park. picnic. And so many pollen.
Chopper putt. He said, 'TschΓΌss allegee' and 'Halo' fule. Here, if you're all at the world, you'll get to come. As a new country, you'll get 10% of the 35 euro. With the code, 'Neu 10'.
You have a real-time job on your own and direct one. Good-shind the video on shop.com/goodshind. Show info with stations, podcasts, and more red, eye, radio. And he is here, Crony, and I'm Gary McNamara coming up in just a minute. What a Trump's former Chief of Staff had to say about the Iran deal in just a minute.
Celebrating 250 years of freedom, you know, Americans have believed all along in one
powerful idea that we were meant to live free, free-to-work hard, free-to-mov free-to-enjoy
life without being held back, but if pain is holding you back, let me recommend first-hand relief factor. They gave me some to try, and I am on board totally. I take it every single day, relief factors are 100% drug-free, researched-based formula, designed to help your body fight inflammation, one of the root causes of pain, and I cannot express
to you enough how well it works for me, all of my eggs and pains from aging, I'm not the youngest guy, and also from running over the years just the wear and tear on your body. With relief factor, I don't have that effect to the effect that it keeps me out of the game.
And I want this for you, and right now, to celebrate 250 years of American independence, they have a special patriotic price for your three-week quick start, and it's just 1776. Just 17 dollars, 76 cents, real simple, go to visit or just go to relieffactor.com, relieffactor.com or call 800, the number 4, relief, 800, 4, relief. All right, here is some audio from Mick Mulvaney, very, very, you know, big Trump supporter,
former acting Chief of Staff, for Trump, here's what he had to say yesterday on the
Iran situation. It's a couple of reasons not to put out the text. Number one, it could be exactly what President Trump said, which is, "I want a bigger podium. I want a bigger stage.
I want a bigger moment." This is a PR thing. Okay, that's one explanation. The other two are, number one, that document doesn't exist yet, and it has been finalized. That's one possibility.
That's another reason why you wouldn't put it out there.
βBut the last one is, and this is one, I think most people are worried about includingβ
Ambassador Volker and myself, is that it's a bad deal. And you don't want to get it out because you want to go ahead and sign it and then try and move into that 60 days, so you sort of say, "Look, it's not a great deal, but we can fix this during the 60-day negotiating period."
There's a, so I guess the bottom line is there's a couple of reasons to not put the
document out, and a couple of them are not really good. Oh, there you go. Now, he was being diplomatic, remember, he's just big front supporters, you might get. That was about as diplomatic as you could be, giving, given his position, with Trump. Look, here's the thing.
Nobody bought it when the leak started happening, but I stepped back and said to myself, "What I'm not hearing, what I'm not seeing, is the problem." You know, this idea that he first mentioned, well, he wants to wait and do it himself. So you have this big grand presentation.
βWhen does Trump wait on things like this if it's already done?β
At the memorandum of understanding is already done, if it's already e-signed, then tell me why you would wait if it's a great deal, because you don't have to, I mean, you know, folding in something else that you said there, you don't have to go on now, and Trump's already done that, but you don't have to, we've talked about, don't oversell
Something, don't over-promise and under-deliver.
You go in and say, "Hey, to be clear, this is the start of a very serious long-term p-steal, but it's a big start," and we believe this puts us and puts the world in a better place, with safeguards in place, and here's why here are the points, and you go through and you'll line them out if they e-signed it over the weekend.
βYou should have expected something Sunday night in a prime time address, and then say,β
we will be posting all of the details at WhiteHouse.gov for the world to see.
The problem is, as Dana Prino said on the five, and we talked about this, the ceremony,
the ceremonial signing with, basically, the IRGC, here she is on Fox News. Okay, can we up the, thank you. Well, I can make their arguments better for them, because there are things that you could say that you would be able to think, okay, so you've killed all of those 40 leaders, but now that IRGC is in charge.
Okay, so that's who we're dealing with, and that's who we're supposed to stand next to on Friday, and sign an agreement that nobody is seeing any red, except for this is the most transparent administration history, but we can't read it like, I can make all of those points.
You have to stop doing that, Dana.
βI think she sounds, and I'll call me, but the thing, like we said at the very beginning,β
the victories are usually visible, clear, understandable, and it's just premature. Yeah, I was listening when she said that, and I thought to myself, well, it's the same thing we had said the night before. They're going to be standing there with the IRGC, that's the imagery you want. They same group that's been slaughtering the people of Iran, are we going to be shaking
hands? Yeah, I mean, it's, it's absolutely mind-boggling, you know, and that's the, that's one of the things, I think it was, let me just see, I think that I saved it, you just see here. It was from, it was something I saw from Rushland, Buzz, Brother yesterday, David Limbaugh, that I went, wow, yeah, let me just see if I can find it here very quickly, because it was
really interesting.
βOkay, it's one thing to caution people to wait and see.β
The actual MOU before judging, but it's entirely another thing to gratuitously doing a bad face and turn on Israel. I don't need to wait two seconds to react to that, and it was as disconcerting, as a current policy seems to be, what may be even more so is the apparent radical retreat from a path that was morally righteous and invigorating.
The whiplash is painful and inexplicable. Like so many, I pray there are more factors yet to be revealed. I, you know, in the back of my mind, I, and this is something I said a few days ago. If it turns out we end up getting the regime out of power and all the uranium in our hands, all turn around and say, well, played.
I got, I have zero confidence, I said it then, I'll say it again. I have zero confidence, that's going to be the case. Because the more we learn about it, the further away we get from a secure situation like that, you know, I had thought the play is here at home domestically, kick the can until November 3, November 4th, go and do the damage.
I don't know that that's that I have any confidence, but that's the case. Again, if that is the case, I'm not sure that I'll say, well, played because you may have given a ran the opportunity along the way, the strike out against Israel, the strike out against American interests, all of these things are a massive risk and you don't give
them that for one second, you're losing confidence by your base and now I don't know
where the confidence level is by the GOP. There's two things here and both are, and are McCarthy wrote a couple of great column yesterday. Fox News reporting Trump is publicly rebuking, rebuking, excuse me, Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu over the war with Hezbollah, quote, Israel's finding Hezbollah too long and too
Many people are being killed, where the hell did that come out?
I don't know. No way. You want to justify that statement. No. No.
Astonishingly, Trump added that Israel should stand aside and let Syria take the lead against Hezbollah.
βAnd this is what he just, I think this is all part of where he just said the Trump administrationβ
thinks were in basales. They think we're absolute idiots. A reminder, Syria is now run by a geodist who claims to be a former al-Qaeda operative I'm in Al-Sharrar, formerly the designated terrorist known as Abu Muhammad al-Jalani. There was, if you could get information, the state on that person, which is the same
person back a few years ago, the State Department offered a $10 million reward.
Wow. It's just like, by all means, let's have Israel stand down. So a former al-Qaeda operative can take on Hezbollah. And then he writes it goes a Trump administration thinks we're in basales. I repeat what I contended yesterday, they think we're idiots.
Let's take down the simple basics.
βTrump's agreement with Iran is not an agreement.β
It's a memorandum of understanding, reportedly stating that the parties will talk about making an agreement for infinitely extendable 60-day limits. That is other than the billions to which the Trump administration has agreed to give the anti-American jihadist regime. The MOU is nothing that Neville Trump is peddling as peace in our time is a nothing that
Neville is responding, Neville Chamberlain is trying to make that comparison to the extent that the MOU is something that is something very bad because if it were something good, we'd be reading it not being spun about it. The president is a man who would not be able to contain himself. Dana Perino said that anybody who knows the president would not be able to contain himself.
If the written MOU were even of marginal benefit to the United States, he would be far more
βcomfortable exposing it and exaggerating the marginal benefits as if it were a coup.β
The fact that the Trump administration refuses to publish the MOU refuses to even brief
the gang of eight on it is a powerful implication that it is as least as bad as close watchers
as spec that is administration apologists maintain that their critics are accepting the IRGC spin, but if there is an information void that the IRGC is filling with propaganda then all the administration has to do is release a written agreement. That would fill the void with verifiable written terms. And by the way, if the IRGC is spinning dishonestly, why is Trump vans crediting regime claims
that it is not pursuing nuclear weapons? The creduity gives Trump's plan the makings of a JCPOA 2.0 since taking the apocalyptic is Islamic regime's word for what its intentions were was the foundation of the original Obama 1. The most ridiculous nonsense, admittedly there is a lot of competition here, is that Iran
has forced war nuclear weapons. Iran has publicly forced more nuclear weapons and emphasize that it is a member of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, well that is what the MPT members that aspire to nuclear weapons do as I recounted yesterday, just to make bigger fools out of us Iran has also maintained that the Iatola even issued a fattwa against nooks, to see the president beating his
chest that Iran has agreed to never have a nuclear weapon is really something special.
A close second on the ridiculous meter is the insistence by Trump and Vice President Vans that Iran will not be getting a diamond tax payer money. That's a straw man. The point is that Iran gets access to funds through sanctions relief and whatever a coca-manion investment fund the administration is conjuring that those funds are not coming
out of the directly out of the U.S. Treasury is besides the point. You just can't, it's just, by the way it wasn't, I mentioned earlier that New York Post had mentioned the word framework or mentioned the word framework and it wasn't them.
It was Fox News and they mentioned it four times in one of the article, the f...
it's a senior official says negotiators will know within weeks whether the framework becomes
an actual agreement. This is insane.
βYou know, if you, well, we'll get to more of this coming up.β
It's, it's, it's the insanity concept. I've got to pay attention to the show and the phrase no, how dare we, oh, I forgot, we're commercial radio. That's true. Yeah.
Get in touch with what I radio, toll free at 866, might be red eye. We are red eye radio. He's our colony. I'm Gary McNamara. By the way, you're not going to like this comment.
I'll read it to you.
I may be able to find the audio on it.
It was some Tom Bevin, real clear politics, Tom. Yeah. And you may not like this. Trump is like the spurs, blew a 29 point lead on Iran. But I'm okay with that.
No, I'm, I'm okay with that. It is absolutely choking. I'll call it when it is and it's a team I followed all my life and you choke, you're choking. It's, I just, I brought the nearing post editorial as one of when it was going to come out.
Yeah. Just blasting. Yeah. It, it, it, it, it, it, it took, not, not that there was anybody in support of it. But it took a turn yesterday where Republican conservatives just went, what the hell's
going on?
βRemember Leon let in the, in the, I see Super Bowl dropping the ball, that's what this feelsβ
like. Not to be our news is brought to you by how products, is it how products.com? This is Ridae Radio on Westwood One. Hey there, I'm Paula Penn. I help people make the smartest money decisions possible.
If you don't control your money, it controls the net. You're not in control of your finances and you have to look outside of yourself to live the life that you want. You're not in control. You're like, like, what is it that you actually want?
Money should follow the dreams and goals because sometimes you make the dream and goal the money and you've overworked yourself and you've exceeded what you've needed for the actual thing you want. Sometimes we forget like, what's the actual thing you want? A Ford anything.
Follow a listen on your favorite platform. Now, it's Ridae Radio, Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Ridae Radio.
On across America, we are Ridae Radio and he is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara, welcome and good morning. Thank you so much for being here. Yeah, thanks. Thanks.
A couple of things here, let's hear from General Jack Keene, who was on Fox News yesterday about the, the Iran deal because I think yesterday was the turning point. It really was. Yeah, and then by the afternoon, I think it was the afternoon when Bloomberg put out the 14 point, the actual MOU and the administration has not said it's not it and the president
has been so quiet and true social on this, it's just amazing.
And you've got now as people say what we said, people that know the president a lot more than we do. Look, if this was a great deal, the president would be out there showing you everything and how, you know, this is a clear victory for the United States and you just can't do it.
But here's Keene yesterday on Fox News, action will be taken. But I can't square some of the things that are coming out of the administration from
βreliable sources, that's what I find so disturbing.β
When I heard it from the Iranians showing, I dismissed, I said, that's the same nonsense we're always hearing. But when I hear from administration sources, some of the things that you have heard of what's in this deal, that makes no sense whatsoever, it's not defensible. I think what the president should do was just, let's release it and let people see what's
out there. So we stopped debating about something none of us has seen. Okay, that was before that was before the Bloomberg thing came out. But yeah, I mean, that's the whole point. I mean, how you know it's bogus is when somebody starts promoting something, we're
out here to promote the deal. And we want to take on everybody who are saying things that are incorrect and we're
Going to chastise you for it, why don't you release it?
Yeah, it's that simple, and I'm amazed, the one thing that is so odd, there are just
some things that are so obvious.
βAnd we used to say this about Green John Pierre and about Biden and everything else.β
But when the president think about this, we're just a little past Tuesday and it was on last Thursday that the president said we're being played for suckers. And so you've got, you know, you send JD Vance out there, which by the way, people were making the comparison that Trump sending JD Vance out there to defend the indefensible is the same thing as, well, not is the same thing.
But is close to Biden sending Kamala Harris out there to be the borders are, it's like, you're going to, you're going to fail on it. But when you got JD Vance out there at the same time saying, no, that's Iranian propaganda, that's Iranian propaganda, that's Iranian propaganda, oh no, Iran says that they're going to give up the nuclear missile, you know, their their their nuclear abilities and we believe
they're credible this time and we believe that they, I mean, you can sell this crap. And I don't care if you try to sell it with confidence or anger or whatever, you can't sell it. Well, this is looking less like an MOU and more like an IOU. It's about his worthless as an IOU.
βIt means two things, deadly and squat, you know, and here's the thing, here's the mostβ
disappointing part of that, there was real progress. The Iotola is dead as in no longer existing. We set them back at least a decade on their ability to get full new weapons. We did some real, real damage, and my question is what for, and this is, this is what I want to play you before I told you what he had said about making the comparison to the,
to the the spurs loss, but this is real clear politics and Tom Bevin yesterday and Israel has, has been doing, it seems like they've been on sort of their own timeline, their own strategy while the Trump administration has been working to try and, you know, negotiate
βtheir way out of this thing and Israel is seemingly less than interested in that.β
So you're right, I mean, it could go sideways, we'll see what happens.
It does feel to me, I know, you know, the next one, their first championship over the
weekend, right, beating the spurs and it does feel a little bit like the Trump administration is is like the spurs in this scenario. They got out to a 29 point lead and now it's like late in the fourth quarter and it's, it's, they've blown the lead somehow. I mean, it just feels like we were in this very, very dominant position initially and Donald Trump decided to create some space for, for negotiations. And from that point on, Iran has been sort
of string us along and waiting us out and doing whatever they can to sort of, you know, gum up the works, which they've done for 47 years. Well, you know, and to compare it to the NDA finals even further, you know, spurs fans had real hope that this could happen. Yeah. I mean, it was only based on a couple of games, but it was real hope that it could happen. And all of a sudden, you know, joking not once, but a couple of times
along the way. And this impact here, the difference is the spurs can come back from this down the road and maybe get another championship. I don't know how you come back from this except for one scenario that I've outlined a number of times, and I'll repeat it again. The regime has gone, the uranium is in our hands. Period. Well, as, as we have said, you know, from the very beginning when they said, you know, regime change, you know, well,
when the president said last week where he said, well, I was never concerned with the
regime change. Of course you were. Yes, you were. Exactly what you're promoted in the eight minute speech, it's exactly why you took out and continue to take out multiple levels
Of the top government officials out there.
attempting to get regime change. So when you don't tell the truth of why you're going
βto war to the American people, and they sit there and they go, well, obviously, it'sβ
what you're doing. Well, no, I mean, the morning that I had told a was above ground having breakfast and they knew that and they went after him, tell me what the point of that going after the I. It's all it would be if it wasn't regime change. Right. So when you BS like that, people don't buy it. Here's more from General Jackie, because he was on Fox news, he was on Fox business news over the last couple of days. Here we go. You can't trust
of why? Because what they're going to want to do is actually go back to all of this to achieve your objectives. They're going to want to reverse what they sign. That's who they are. And we have to accept that. So therefore, it has to be enforcement and compliance. And that could be there in terms of money. But also, listen, people are forgetting what happened last week. Last week, the Iranians were not moving towards this MOU fast enough. There were
to happen, as I said, the president likes to say. And what did he do? He conducted two strikes
against Iran, multiple strikes, two nights worth of strikes. He was about to do a third
when Iranians said, "Okay, we're ready to do this." That is still available to him. And I know for a fact he is prepared to use it. And if anybody doubts it or the Iranians
βdoubt that, how can you dismiss the evidence we had or what he just did last week?β
Oh, yes, the only failure of that of Jeckine is you've got this deal with sucks. Yeah. So if you're saying that he went after them and then Iran got this deal, they were willing to come to the table with my God. But he didn't get anything. Tell me what the get is. I do love the remaining Trump people that are trying to spin it. And how they have to, you know, when Scott Kelly talked about McCabe and how impressed he was on being very careful
about what he could say and couldn't say. This is kind of that same dance. And I understand in certain positions you kind of have to, but I'm not willing to do that. This is horrible. And it's disappointing coming from this particular president. After what this particular
βpresident literally accomplished and two major attacks on Iran. Now we're going to beβ
standing with the IRGC. I'm still wondering. We're going to be shaking hands. Yeah. That's not going to work. It's it is mind boggling how quickly this, this happened. I'll quickly, how quickly the change happened. Let me just, we had the, I had the New York post editorial. Iran's Trump's Iran deal gives the Islamic Republic big wins up front and America nothing. Vice President JD van sales pitch for the Iran deal is simply terrible. But President
Donald Trump's may be worse. Maybe the reporting on what's in the memorandum of understanding his wrong, but team Trump keeps confirming some of the worst news. The best we can tell the deal does nothing to achieve. The aims America started the war with, but does hand to Iran a whole series
of games Iran gets at least a few billion in immediate funds and can start selling oil right
away, which they've already done. Yes. With at least some other sanctions dropped as well. More Iran wins unprecedented authority over the Strait of Hormuz and likely locks in Hezbollah's dominance in Lebanon. When I saw that, they give the control the Strait of Hormuz. Recall our goals. A president open combat seeking to permanently end nuclear Iran's nuclear threat and also eliminate its missiles and other offensive capabilities. And we also hope for regime
change. The bombing set back its new programs took out a lot of missiles and missile factories and to capitate in most of the regime's top leadership. All the talks in the start of April have done nothing more. Indeed, have only let new Iranian leaders rebuild and regroup even as the population suffers. Why think they'll change in another 60 days of talking? Vance's happy case is that the big prices for Iran are contingent on the behavior as he's set on Hannity.
If they're willing to behave like a normal country, quit chasing nukes and funding terror, then we're willing to actually fundamentally transform our relationship with them. But that's been
true since the 1979 revolution. Yeah. And the regime has never gone for it. Trump talking with
Qatar's ruler actually claim the regime has changed since we killed off so ma...
who wound up in charge are very rational people nice to deal with, not radicalized. Huh?
βIt's leaders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. They're calling the shots over there.β
The Goons that committed are committed to the radical agenda. Vance would cough and cushioner
never talk to them only to the political fronts for real power. And it's easy to say to be
nice when the negotiations are handing you win after win, Trump's proud that Iran promises to stick to only peaceful nuclear programs, but it never stopped making that promise even after it never ceased to do the opposite. We never had this level of direct communication with the Iranian leadership Vance bragged on Hannity. Again, they weren't talking to the real leaders just the front men. Satter still he claimed we're seeing even people that I would have assumed our
hardliners who are kind of saying maybe it was a mistake for us to do those things we've done
over the last 40 years. Maybe we should have turned over a new leaf with our relationship in the
United States. They were slaughtering 40,000 of their own civilians months ago. Suddenly they're going to get normal. No hardliner versus moderate is just a good cop bad cop stick. The Iranians have pulled on Westerners for decades right along with pretending to regret over the past. It's beyond foolish to think the Iranians have changed just because they say so. But they say that as I've taught you that that's the thing that boggles my mind is Vance's out there has he no self-awareness
on one hand he's saying, you know, that's all propaganda coming from the Iranians. Oh, but we believe the Iranians here, here, here, here and here. And the claims that they believe them on are absolutely unbelievable. So forget about what we said yesterday. Forget about what the actual is in there. The administration has not said that what was released yesterday is false. Right. But as we said, don't you know, to pay attention to what what possibly might be in the so-called
MOU? All you've got to do is listen to what Trump and Vance are saying and you're like, for God's sake makes some kind of consistent sense. You're all over the damn place and trying to be forceful and arrogant about it doesn't sell it. No, that makes it worse. That makes it worse. Just unbelievable. The confidenceometer is at an all-time in low with me. Yep. That's a big deal
going back to 2016. It's amazing. It just makes me wonder who in the hell's running the show
is Biden still in charge. This comes off as a madness deal. Like somebody said today, there's Hunter in charge. No, it was like, Obama remember the Obama actually ran the Biden administration.
βNow, Obama's running the Trump in a minute. Well, I think Hunter Biden is running it becauseβ
somebody's on crack if they wrote this Hunter Biden's running it. We are running our radio. This morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by House products tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. After a round of extreme weather last week at the Midwest, the forecast this week appears quieter. We've got actually some more rain coming back in. Nothing like what we saw last week when we had the excessive rainfall on the central corn belt.
We're looking at at the most one to two inches of rain across parts of the Midwest. coverage will be much more scattered than last week. And in most cases, it will be beneficial rainfall, maintaining adequate to locally surplus topsoil moisture for these rapidly growing corn and soybeans. U.S. DAB Arrologist Brad Ripie says the recent moisture is also benefiting. Midwestern pastures this time of year. And everything is really coming up roses
βfor the Midwest as we head into some of these key weeks in the development season for corn andβ
soybeans to no changes. And temperatures are going to stay at a very reasonable level. And we should get a bit more moisture as we head on through the middle part of June. I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Cenex fuels and loops. We are running a video. He's our protein. I'm Gary McNamar.
That's the only defense so far is that stop speculating on what the deal is.
that then put out the deal. Then put out the deal now. Why would you wait if you've already
βe-signed the deal and it's a great deal? Why would you wait to release it? Somebody tell me,β
give me a good answer. And you know, I mean, there was we played the audio cut before. It's well, they want to do the proper presentation. No, I don't buy that shaking hands with
representatives of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. If you're if you're a Trump supporter,
do you agree with that? If you're looking for cheerleaders, you found the wrong radio show. Yeah. And as we have said, we started yesterday. Doesn't even matter what's in the deal. We're judging them by what they're saying. I voted for this guy multiple times. So did I. I want him to win. Yep. This brings my confidence to a new low. Yeah. And as we've stated, it's up to them to not keep us guessing. And so you've got the source stories out there as we know,
βwhich can be wrong. We've always admitted that. But since it was released, the fort, the Bloombergβ
released it and then other media picked up the 14 points. It exists out there. You can read it
yourself. The administration has not said that that is false. Yeah. And they've had plenty of time to do it. And you know, this administration does. So we have stated we read it. We didn't see anything about Israel in it to begin with. But we're judging them by what they're saying. And for them to be out there, vans is out there promoting a deal and criticizing the critics while not telling you what's in the deal. And telling you that it's a great deal without letting
you see the deal. And it's our fault. Yeah. Why are you complaining? Yeah. That's my question. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Factor Studios. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our Carly and I'm Gary McNamara. Well, coming good morning, download our Red Eye Radio app today and you can listen when and where you choose. Yeah, the the entire thing of well, they haven't released it. So nobody should be talking about it. And you
guys shouldn't be talking about it. Well, the they shouldn't be talking about it. They're the ones promoting it. Yeah, they're promoting it. And so as we and we pointed out that what vans, you know,
promoted no Republican is making that case that it's US taxpayer dollars for the 300 billion.
We don't know where it's going to get where you're going to get 300 billion in investment into a ran. That's going to be interesting. Yeah. Who's going to invest? Who's going to invest? Who's good? What private organizations is going to say? Let's invest money into the private sector of the ran run by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. But as we said, we've been commenting the majority of it. Now, we bring you the news. We're not going to not tell you that Bloomberg and other media outlets have
released with the 14 point plan is. And when we see with the 14 point memorandum of understanding is and we read it, it's exactly what the critics have speculated is in it. Yeah. Right. So the early leaks. If this
βis what it is and the administration has not come out because it's been out for what now? Nine ten hours?β
Yeah. There's nobody saying, look, that's not that's not it. It's wrong. You guys are wrong on it. You haven't heard that. And so, you know, we go by, we report the news to you. And yeah, we'll throw out a little speculation if when whatever. But the thing that really gets us is the things that President Trump and JD Vans are actually saying what they're saying in their own words. Here's another one. This was the worst of the president yesterday. Here we go talking about Israel
because he's attempting to make Israel the bad guy in all of this. Yeah. Here we go. Israel's fighting as much too long and too many people are being killed. And you don't have to knock down an apartment house every time you're looking for somebody because there are a lot of people who's apartment houses and they're not all as one of that I can tell you. He's trying to make the and then he goes on to suggest that the former Al Qaeda head of Syria should be disarming Hezbollah
instead, which was just the most bizarre statement that you could possibly make. But he's actually he's implying that Israeli Israel targets civilians. Right. Right. It's it's reprehensible,
Absolutely reprehensible.
It's pure BS and like you, I voted for him three times. But I don't care. If you're going to be a
tribal person, if you're going to sit the eye adore this person, they can never do wrong,
then you're a moron. I don't know why you wouldn't question all of this. Right.
βThe people come and go. The people are fallible. The ideas remain. That's what this nation wasβ
founded on and it doesn't matter what your name is and if I voted for you or not, if I disagree, you're going to hear about it. It's what I do for a living and if I didn't do it for a living, you'd still hear about it because I'd properly. I moved well. You know what you haven't heard in the last couple of days or I've seen at all on social media because I've tried to read as many
comments as I can. Just to get an idea of how people are thinking I haven't seen one in the last 48
hours about. But it's the art of the deal and he's playing fifth dimensional chess. No. None of that. You've heard more of no. This is the art of the Custanza deal. Yeah. Going back. Well, the only thing I've
βheard is why do you keep complaining about the deal? Because it sucks. You know, this take is aβ
stake. It's chicken. I ordered steak, but man. I guess I won't complain. You know, the the, uh, and by the way, we do know, for example, like, you know, with the oil. That's in the 14 point. We know they sold oil yesterday. Yeah. So we know they're getting partial sanctions relief. Right.
But I want to get back to this because this is the one thing. This is what J.D. Vance,
you know, was talking about. This seems to be his major talking point. It's not taxpayer funds. And on this score, the Washington Free Beacon's Adam Kratos and this goes back to Andrew McCarthy's column yesterday reports that the Trump's White House emphasis that Iran is really getting its own money back, not taxpayer dot funds. How stupid do they think they are? Iran's funds are frozen based on sanctions imposed in part due to its terrorism support. In addition to its nuclear weapons work,
its ballistic missile work, human rights abuses, and targeting US military and civilian vessels on the high seas. If the US could keep funds from Iran, but is now instead allowing the funds to be paid to Iran, that is material support to a state sponsor of terrorism. It was when Biden did it. It is when Trump does it. Yeah. Again, it's material support to a state sponsor of terrorism, which over the Iranian regime has been since 1984,
under formal state department designation. It doesn't matter that the funds are supposedly Iran's rather than a payout from the US Treasury. Our government is giving access to billions of dollars and funds to an entity. Our government concedes uses its funds to underwrite the arsenals and deadly activities of its terrorist proxies that target American interest and American military over the last 47 years. And of story. Just insane. Just insane.
βBecause the only way to reinstil confidence on this entire thing in a person like me is to comeβ
back November 4th or whenever it's going to be, take out the regime, take the Iranian. That's not going to happen. I'm not putting a dime on that bet. You just remind me of something that I saw from and is really media outlet that I say that I think I did. I don't know where it is. Yeah. I thought I saved it. It was from a Israeli news service. It said, we are such big supporters of Trump. Either this is the worst deal ever or hopefully
we just pray. He's setting them up to justify the bombing, the hell out of them down the road. That's a possibility. But they said, that's our hope. They're not too confident about it because of what has been going on in the fact that they made the memorandum of understanding and the fact is we all know that they know that prices are killing them.
In the polling, you can't get much lower than everyone including Republicans ...
economy. And I'm talking about Rasmussen, all the Republican polls, not just I don't trust any of the polls.
βBut one poll I pay attention to the most is Rasmussen to see how that moves because that's aβ
Republican poster in the last couple of weeks. He, you know, has broken the record for a lowest in the
second term in the Republican poll and lowest is the economy. But it was you said, this is a
president that was elected on strong foreign policy and the economy and the border. Yeah. Yeah. Look, I have a number of theories that could work to support if I wanted to be in the cheerleader crowd to say what this deal might set up. I'm not in the mood. I'm not going to do that. Show me. Show me. And I don't think there should be a, you know, wherever we are, we're less than 150
days from election today. I don't think you give them the room between now and election day. Because there's no telling what a RAN could do. A RAN sees this as a win. You're not going to convince me that the regime is a new type of regime. This is an all new regime. This is from, I was looking at the, it's news and commentary on Israel's called massade commentary. A RAN firing multiple drones and ships at Hormuz every night since
the agreement is signed. U.S. shooting UAVs down before they threaten vessels, source tells NBC. Mm. What was the other one that I was looking at the other day? Or the, the, it was the one thing that they had said here is where they were like, you know, look, we're pro Trump. Can't see to him. I, I just, I saw yesterday and then I didn't save it for some reason, but they were the ones that were saying, you know, we support Trump. We hope that, you know,
the only hope is that this has got to be something to completely wipe them out in a set up, set up in a few months, because this doesn't, this turn doesn't make any kind of sense at all.
βLook, if you want to talk about propaganda and siops and how this could set them up to giveβ
them false confidence, the regime, false confidence in order to move in a certain direction. And when you see them moving in that direction, you go in and you take them out. I'm not going to tell you you're wrong, because I, I don't know what the future is. Right, but we shouldn't be doing this because we've been told we shouldn't be speculating. I know.
Yeah. Well, and I've talked about how after, you know, in the first couple of weeks,
when the bombing settled and they, they hit the pause button, I said, well, for Intel purposes, that's almost necessary, because you need to knock on doors and find out who's, who's in charge, who's still around. You know, Trump says he's being told or the media, in fact, is doing stories. They're being told by their spokesman that the new Iatola is doesn't want, no, doesn't want this, doesn't want, we haven't seen him.
Yeah. So I don't know what's real, what isn't real, what I do know that is that if you're going to because on the propaganda front, just imagine that this is propaganda and setting up false hopes for a ran so that they'll make a move so you can take them out.
βThat would be a strategy, but why aren't you on Sunday night, you should have had aβ
prime time address announcing it bigger than ever. In fact, you would go bigger on promoting it in order to give them false confidence. I, I found it as from 10 hours ago. I'm, we are huge supporters of Trump, but the current situation does not align with the man we all know, either there has been a huge shift within himself, or he is setting up a ran for another massive round of hellfire missiles. Please, God, we hope the latter. But the fact is,
why would you need another 60 days to do it? You don't need another 60 days to do it. That's the
whole point. Yeah, you don't need, you don't need. Well, well, see, here's the thing.
60 days, almost gets you to the election.
120 days almost gets you, gets you to election. So, right before the election,
βsomething's going to happen one way or the other, or are we going to kick the can again?β
I, I can't tell you. What I can tell you is that this doesn't pass the smell test. A lot like that, that date, jerky, I've been eating in the studio when the mics are off.
You don't, you really don't like that at all. It's like pungent. Oh, my gosh, it's great. I love it.
It's, your taste buds too. It's dirty, but you're not. It's Dorito. Oh, I love the smell.
βBecause I know what I'm about to eat. Oh, gosh, I could live on it. I'm taking it to an island.β
That's all I get. That and one carpenter's album. That's all I need. We are right, I radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.
I'm Gary McNamara. One thing we know is that the $300 billion
or whatever investment fund down the road. Here's General Jack Keen about that in the Iran M.O. You. If you can't have a nuclear deal for 10, 20 years similar to the JCP away. And the
βfunding is real. There's a $300 billion investment fund. Who cares where the money comes from?β
If it doesn't come from the United States, I get that. Of course, it shouldn't come from anybody. I mean, when we recover Germany and Japan, the Nazis were in charge of Japanese imperialist foreign and charge. Here, the Iranians and charge. The killers and thugs are still in charge. We don't give them that money because what are they going to do with it? They're going to recover everything we've taken away from them. Who cares whether it's coming from the arrows, from the
Qataris or whatever, they don't get it. They shouldn't get any of it. There you go. Yeah, and that part we know is true because Vans has verified that. And so again, it's just like, it's just -- and the thing is when they say they don't get any of it, but they have. We've allowed them to get oil money already. They've already, I guess, two tankers have already sold the oil as a final yesterday. And other things, just for signing the memorandum of understanding. Right. And so you can't
win this argument with the Republican part. No. This is Ridae Radio. On Westwood One.


