06-29-26 Part Two - Iran So Far Away

It's always good. It's always fun.

"Kourds" says "Freshest" for Aldi.

“To all the prices, this week, Mini-Wasser-Millone,”

the kilo for only $1.29. Or nectarines. The one kilo for only $1.80. In a decade there are many further categories in your Aldi Nordwiljale. And go further and enjoy!

Aldi! Go to Sfjalll. I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning! You know, I heard a friend of a friend told me and this is when you were gone last week.

The last two days, Thursday and Friday. I think both days I just went Iran. Okay, Ben, they're done that. Nearly nothing new here.

“I mean, this is what we expected and I moved on.”

He said, "What, you're not talking about it anymore?" And I went, "Well, no, I'll talk about it." And I said, "It's almost to me, like Groundhog Day for 47 years." Yeah. And so anything, even over the last couple of days, it's the same thing.

When Trump came out, I actually get embarrassed when Trump says things like, "It's

very possible that Iran will never learn."

The post on Saturday, it just was as true social post. I was like, "Here we go again." There we go again. It's Groundhog Day over and over and over again. And then, like I said, if it's almost as when Trump broke that, it's very possible that

they will never learn. I've just discovered this that Iran may not learn. Here it is. Here it is from Saturday evening. And I was on the plane when this was posted.

And I just talked to a friend of mine who was also on my flight about the whole thing going on with Iran. And so it was kind of interesting to me. But he posted this while I was mid-flight. United States and President Trump on true social.

United States aircraft just struck Iranian missile and drone storage locations and coastal radar sites for violating the ceasefire agreement again and all caps.

It is very possible that they will never learn.

And I stopped right there and I just thought I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I know. There may come a point, he writes, "When we are no longer able to be reasonable and there may, there may come a point. We haven't passed that point."

And we'll be forced to militarily complete the job that we very successfully started interesting because I was just telling my friend that in the airport before we boarded our flight. I said, "We are going to have to finish the job." If that happens, he writes, "The Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist President

DJT." And I thought to myself, "Okay." It's this whole thing and he's going back a couple of weeks ago, they're playing me for a full, it's a ran Mr. President. We went in for a reason.

You know who they are. You know who you're dealing with and don't pretend you don't. And now, because it's not a good look now, it's not. This is the thing, there are two missions here in my mind and I said during the pre-show meeting.

I don't even like saying this, my father served in two wars. I've not served, so I have not served in war, I've never been the President, I've never been the President who has to make a decision, especially about a country like Iran. But here's the mission as I see it as a citizen who has lived through this 47 years of regime in Iran.

And this is what I'll say.

“Twofold, number one, priority, you have to destroy the regime, they have to be gone.”

I know. These years said then done and I do understand what that's going to take and it's going to be a lot of boots on the ground. Because without doing that, you cannot get there uranium, which is mission number two.

this point may be delaying Iran, but it also will be a diversion of Iran's tactics because

“they'll still be fully capable of funding their proxies and their proxies will be attacking”

with or without nuclear weapons all over the world and then Iran comes out over the weekend saying, "Well, we need a nuclear bomb to protect ourselves." Yeah. Wow. And that's it.

The second highlight is how House of the Dragon and Wicked, one of the two Euro-189 in the world, streaming, but not so wow. Wow. And that's just a bit. So now you've got a situation that could not be more clear and Mr. President, hold your head out of your ass and complete the mission.

I don't think you're ever seen boots on the ground.

I don't think he wants that he's never been that kind of president.

“I think he believed going in, they could bomb it and then there could be an overthrowing”

another regime. Regene change was always the goal and it's clear now. It has to be goal number one and it's not going, I don't believe it's going to get done. Reading here from the Wall Street Journal where it's very possible that they will never learn.

Mr. Trump wrote of Iran's regime on Saturday night, or is it the U.S. decision makers who never learn?

Vice President J.D. Vance has been touting Iran's transformed Islamic revolutionary

guard core leaders ready to turn over a new leaf. That's in quotes with the U.S.

“He even reached a gentleman's agreement with them outside of the memorandum Mr. Vance assured”

critics. Well, these are no gentlemen. It's the same terrorist regime and this is the battle of Hormuz that Mr. Trump thought he had ducked in case there was any doubt. The Foreign Minister said Sunday that Iran is solely responsible for managing the

straight under the memorandum. He said no other country has responsibility in that regard. By the way, he's Iran's chief negotiator against Mr. Vance. It wasn't enough that Mr. Trump gave Iran an oil sanctions waiver without safeguards, promised billions in frozen assets and stop sanctions enforcement.

The regime wants to conquer the straight and turn it into a toll booth with transit by permission only on a ship by ship basis, Iranian foreign policy would determine who crosses. This is the opposite of free navigation and provides no security for energy flows. Forces of regime is a regime's means to take to make the world bend. Without it, shipers refuse to heed Iran's dictates for Hormuz during the deals early

days. Vessels say a lot of the, the, say a lot of the, say a lot via the straight southern lane, Iran's demands and ships transit only through the Iranian lane request access two days in advance and sign up for a special Iranian insurance or ignored oil prices fell faster than most experts expected.

In short, the straight was not going Iran's way. It was becoming free again, hence the regime's resort to force Iran is intimidating Oman and other Gulf states. It may also offer them a cut of the spoils from a told straight by that hardly sweetens the foul deal for the rest of the world.

The question is, why Iran still gets cash selling its oil free of sanctions, repatriating the revenue to fund the revolutionary guard. If Mr. Trump is not ready to resume the US blockade, he can amend treasuries sanctions relief license to require that all proceeds from Iranian oil sales be placed in escrow.

The US needs the leverage for nuclear negotiations and it was never wise to give Iran a

That's the whole problem.

“And I saw the only defense from the president's surrogates over the weekend again.”

But he has destroyed the nuclear program. We know it's been done. It's not what's been done. It's what's happening now and negotiations for the future and it's based on what the president himself told us.

We are not assuming anything we're simply looking at precisely what the president told us in that eight-minute speech and before we went on, what was the minimum that would be required and this is, as I called it before and I'll call it still the same thing. This is a custanse negotiation. Oh, yeah.

This is a George custanse of from side-feld negotiation, if you understand, we're going backwards and the president's trying to convince the world and his Republican party that

“this is a sign of strength and the Republican party is looking at it from a completely opposite”

point of view saying, no, it's not. You're not going to change Iran. You will not change this regime, so the regime must be gone. There's no way around that fact. Did you see the polling that when Republicans were asked whether they thought it was a good

deal, 62% said yes, once they found out what was in the deal, it dropped 30 points, only 32% of Republicans. And that was a week ago, right, still support it.

You see what's going on now, it's just, it's really incredible, but the, you know, I would

tell the president and J.D. Vance this, stop B.S.ing, yeah, and stop trying to convince Republicans of things that Republicans know are not true. Because when you tell Republicans that this is an Iranian revolutionary guard that has realized the air of their ways for the last 47 years, a kinder gentler regime. But when you do that, Republicans don't believe you.

They look at you. And then when the president came out and said, they're playing us for a fool. Which you meant, they're playing me for a fool. Yes. And then comes out and makes statements that you say, Mr. President, you just said they're

playing you for a fool, you sound like you're being played now for a fool. Stop it. You keep playing the same game, but at the minimum, at the minimum, put the sanctions back on again, stop the cash from flowing. Yes.

Why would you stop that? You've said, if we give them what they want, then they'll be willing to do it because, hey, I'm trying to make an economic deal with them. They don't care about economics. You're trying to appease.

There is no deal making with the regime, none. There isn't a deal.

There will never be a deal.

Even if there's a deal. That's too America, just until the end, and now over the weekend, oh, no, we need nuclear bombs. Yeah. There will not, and this is the thing, after we killed the IOTOLA, again, from the perspective

of living to it the 47 years, it was unbelievable. And I thought, this is going to end the regime, but if you don't have the will to complete

“the mission, as it is required, then why did you begin to begin with?”

You may have delayed them from advancing in their nuclear program for a number of years, but you're funding them by lifting sanctions. Yeah. You went after Biden for four years for doing that. And then when you came back, immediately put those sanctions back in place for a reason.

And now they're gone, I don't get it at all, because even if you got there, uranium, even if they handed it over, and you could verify that was all they had, they'd still have the funding for their proxies, and their proxies would be at work all over the world. And there is no doubt in my mind that the attack that they would plan would make 9/11 look like a week at Disney World.

But we're funding them to attack, as we know, what was it in the year before?

by the proxies that were being funded by the Biden administration.

And now we're back to saying, OK, oil revenue, you can have. Right. And there's no defense of it. Nobody can defend it. The only defense I saw again was, yeah, but we've hurt them so much already.

We know that. Yeah. What are you doing now? Why are you doing? What's your doing?

Why are you helping them by funding them? Why are you pretending that they are, you're dealing with Western negotiators who are

“looking for an improvement in their economic future?”

Right. And they want the money to give to the terrorists to attack the United States in Israel. Unconditional surrenders. What we heard and it's now it's I'm wondering which side he meant by that. We are right.

I radio brought to you by FPPF fuel power max surviving a thriving as an odor operator has just as much to do with managing costs as it does with generating revenue, understanding basic principles of operating costs can save you thousands of dollars a year. Costs are not the same each month. If 96 of miles are driven one month and 10,000 miles of the next, two different sets

of costs apply for each month. For example, if your tractor payment is $1,850 per month and you drive 96 hundred miles in the month, your tractor payment is costing you 19.3 cents per mile.

“Drive 10,000 miles, though, and that same payment will cost you 18.5 cents per mile.”

This is one of your major fixed costs while paying off a truck loan. The difference in this example is only a fraction of a cent, which may seem like small

change, but it ultimately amounts to $960 more annually on the bottom line, because

though fixed costs do not go down over time, you can reduce your cost per mile with more paid miles. Owner operator Business 101 is provided by Overdrive Partners in Business Program. Go to OverdriveOnLi.com to the partners in business section of the website for more details on this and many other topics brought to you by ShellRotella, with advanced synthetic

technology is designed to help keep your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. One's open for your goals, 866-90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio, he is our Crony and I'm Jerry Mac, the mayor, so the other thing we got over the weekend was that the Democrats basically have said whether it's Cory Booker saying what you heard is the big tent.

It's all part of the big tent, it's all part of the big tent. No one's fully committing. It's all part of the big. We're the big tent party, we're the party of Nazis, communist, socialist. We have the big tent.

Tell me where you disagree with people in your party. Mr. Booker, tell me what you believe and don't believe in their new constitution for the Democratic Socialists. Here's Cory Booker over the weekend. We see people in our country that have to courage to stand up, we should applaud that

and celebrate that. A lot of people right now are trying to paint the Democratic Party and insinuate division and differences before us, I've one of these people that believes very clearly. If everybody in your coalition agrees with you on everything, then your coalition isn't big enough.

“Okay, now where's the falsehood that Republicans agree on everything, right?”

Yeah. And as we all know that isn't true, it's what you disagree about. It's specifically what you disagree about. We disagree with Nazi tattoos. We disagree with the misogyny and the sexism of the radical transgender movement.

We disagree with the racism of the Democrats' institutionalizing identity politics inside their party where we judge people by groups. We disagree with the Democrats' socialist of America and believe it's radical to rewrite the constitution and get rid of the separation of powers and get rid of the electoral college and get rid of the Senate and to put the presidency and the Supreme Court under

the House of Representatives and get rid of prisons and get rid of law enforcement, get rid

of border enforcement, get rid of the first amendment, get rid of the Second Amendment.

any reasonable person could ever have about what the United States of America should

be. Yep.

“And tell me, Mr. Booker, where are you, the big tent, which side of that tent are”

you on? Yeah. Let me hear you express your concerns and your debates within your own party that you have. Because if I'm under the tent, and I spend a lot of time in tents as a boy's garden, I would sit there and say, "Look, this tent ain't big enough for the both of us if you're

a Nazi." Yeah. No, not a Nazi. No, Nazis are communists in my tent. Go over to the Nazi tent.

Yes.

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

You're listening to Red Eyewitness from the Rayleigh Factor Studio. And he is our crony, and I'm Gary McNamara. Hey, did you hear that to Gavin Newsom came out against the billionaire's tax in California? No. Now he did come out for the billionaire's tax on the federal level.

Now why would he possibly oppose the billionaire's tax in California? Hmm, I found Jonathan Turley's post from over the weekend. In opposing the California billionaire's tax, Gavin Newsom has a curious argument. Yeah. You may not be able to pick up and move to Texas or Florida to shelter urine come from

taxation, but I promise you that billionaires can and do, in other words, most of us want to flee the state, but can't. Right.

The problems that many non-billionaires are also fleeing the state, yet it appears most

Californians are kept in population, but there are people can actually go to well-run a states with low taxes and great schools. Welcome to hotel California.

“That's what he's been calling it for a while.”

Right. Yeah. Now, but think about this, Newsom said, you may not be able to pick up and move to Texas or Florida to shelter urine come from taxation. Right.

It's telling you there are cheaper places to live and we're not going to make it any cheaper for you. Right. Oh my gosh. Yes.

No, of course. And if you do it on the federal level, you've got no place to go. Right. You have no place to go. Well, it's a little bit like the whole thing with nationalized health care.

Right. Every state could be as liberal as they want. Oh, yeah. Every single state could do so much of what they wanted to do from the liberal point of view.

You could have your liberal Nirvana. Oh, yeah. And we talked about this on health care, nationalizing health care. Well, California tried to do it, Colorado tried to do it for a month, tried to do it.

“Single payer system, whatever they tried, every one of them said, no, why?”

They didn't want to pay for it. That's the reality. That's the selfishness of the Democrats, right? They only want to be able to have health care if they can borrow it from future generations. Yeah.

Hight it by borrowing and borrowing and borrowing and borrowing. And borrow it. Nobody cares about 40 trillion dollars. Because otherwise, you would have state health care completely in California, Colorado in Vermont.

They all went that direction and they all backed off, said it's too expensive. What do you mean it's too expensive? If it's too expensive on the state level, why would it be? Why would it be cheaper on the federal level? Well, because we could just make debt and have our children and grandchildren pay for what

we wish to have today. Oh, you mean your selfishness and your greed? Oh, yeah. I mean, for God's sake, if you're saying, I want to support what I want today on the backs of my grandchildren and great grandchildren that aren't even in existence yet, I mean

that's the ultimate in greed. That's right. Yep. It's, and they do this over and over again, you know, again, hoping that it will, they push this idea in these blue states, hoping it will catch fire on a national level.

Oh, yeah. We should all tax them. So there should be a federal tax on billionaires.

Then running to taxes isn't going to save you.

“And they can't, as you mentioned, come on, California.”

It's, it's an even exchange, $19 a gallon for gasoline, but free healthcare. But I, I just got to love it, but I mean, Newt does, they don't even think there's no self-awareness at all.

Because he basically says no on against the billionaires tax here in California, because

you people that aren't billionaires, we're going to continue to tax you. You can't hide your income. You can't afford to move. The billionaires can. Yeah.

And so we should have a billionaire, not we're going to attempt to improve our state. No. To make it more economically feasible, like Texas and Florida are because he's the one that's admitting it's cheaper to live in Texas and Florida, and people may want to move. But you can't, who else said that?

“Was it, my, my mdani or was it, Hockel, right?”

Was it Hockel, who said it? I think Hockel. Yeah, because your, your captive of the, your captive of the state, that was Hockel. That was Hockel. Yeah.

So both the governors of New York and California basically said the same thing.

We've made it so expensive to be here and you can't get out. And so we better tax the billionaires because we're not going to lower your taxes in any way. Right. You're still going to have to pay.

By the way, I did check on, since, you know, the, the, the Hockel said, well, okay, let's bail out New York again, the rest of New York state. You're going to have to pay mmdani for this. Well, she still leads by 20 points over the Republican candidate. Well, there you go.

“And remember, you know, when she was told because she was looking at the, all the energy”

costs going up and she was saying, saying, we need to do something and the other Democrats in her state were saying, no, no, no, no, no, no, this is by design. We want electricity costs to go through the roof. That's the effect that we're looking for at the Democrat. They're looking to punish not billionaires, not corporations.

Everybody. Yep. Okay, she said, we've got to do something. We've got to stall this climate change bill in the Democrats and legislature said, no. The intent of it, just like we said way back in 2008, when Obama said it, the goal was

to skyrocket electricity, a price is, it wasn't an unintended consequence, it was very intended. It wasn't because of the lack of raw materials. It wasn't anything to do with the marketplace, no, it's because the Democrats in governments goal was to skyrocket your electricity prices. Yep.

How do we know this? Because they told us, yeah, starting with Obama in February of 2008, that was his goal. Yep. We just loved it. He's a smart guy.

Oh, wish we could have a president like him that was so certain, let me, it wasn't that he raised prices and lied about it. He told you, I want to raise prices, I want to skyrocket your electricity prices. He said, in fact, he used the word necessarily, yes. Under my plan of cap and trade, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.

It's necessary for the plan.

It is necessary for that to happen because without it, you're never going to implement

this costly, bogus green energy plan. And you're never going to fully get what they're looking for, and that is government control and ownership of the energy sector altogether. Are you ready? Here we go.

All right, Ryan. Here we go. We're going to play this front because people don't believe us. Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. There you go.

That's it. Everywhere of 2008. Yep. That was part of his campaign to run for president and the West Virginia coal miners association endorsed him because he goes on to say how he's going to bankrupt coal industry and

he got the endorsement from the West Virginia coal miners association.

It's the same thing. How does that even make sense? No idea. New survey from Ellen University found that the majority of Democrats would prefer living in another country rather than the United States.

The June 2nd surveys, most notable findings, showed that 55% of Democrats answered yes when asked whether there is another country they would rather live today than the United States, 10% of Republicans responded in the same way. The results suggest that many Democrats who the United States, let's favorably then Republicans. Really?

Really? Let me see here, 75% of Republicans agree that the American dream remains achievable regardless of the circumstances if people work hard enough compared to just 25% of Democrats. What's your definition of the American dream? Right.

What is the American dream? Don't say home ownership because they don't believe anybody should own a home. Remember, they moved away from that. Yeah, it's exactly right, owning a home to selfish.

“I think they're reversing that now for this election.”

To me, the American dream has never been about anything material at all.

Nothing. No. It's simple. Now, the result of the American dream got me there where I own a home and have a car and don't have debt and things like that and have savings, but that was not the American dream.

The American dream was freedom and opportunity. That was it. It was the opportunity to work in order to earn those things. It wasn't. I'm in a job.

I never thought about this when I was working, you know, two, sometimes three jobs in my 20s and even into my 30s. I was never thinking, well, how come it just doesn't appear with one job?

I never thought about that once.

And when I started hearing that from people, well, oh, it should have to do his work one job.

“And, you know, that also, I don't know if you saw that over the weekend and I don't know”

why you've got sort of, I don't Matt Walsh had something on it talking about how, you know, the boomers are hoarding their money and not giving it to their kids to buy homes. Or they're hoarding it for their own self worth and not putting it into productive purposes or handing it down to their kids. How dare they work hard for money all of their lives and then do what they want with

it. Because making the case, making the case that it was easy back in the 50s and 60s. And my, and my father never forgot my father going, we hear about all these, the good old days. Because when they went with a good old days, yeah, because I, you know, I came out of World

War 2 in the 50s when I got married, my father was working three jobs. Yep. But that came home from Vietnam. He was going to night school and also had a second job.

And we were young, we never saw my father.

He was always working. My mother, my mother stayed at home. Yeah. I mean, I saw him. But I mean, if we, I'd hear him at, you know, basically when he slept, probably between

11 o'clock and three in the morning, that was going to say, if I saw, if I saw my dad, I was up really late, you know, I mean, it was, and that was it. And I love my dad. A great example, but that was, you know, that was five kids, their choice, same thing with my mom, stay at home mom, which is a full time 24/7 job.

And dad did his multiple jobs quite often, in fact, most often, even during his military career. My dad helped build the basement of the first house. And he looked at my wife, wow, he's like, can't do that anymore. I don't think the builder will look, I'm going to build the basement and then you.

Yeah. Right. But that basement still, I go by the house, that basement still is strong today. Yep. But yes.

So you, you look at that, that 75% of Republicans agree that the American dream remains achievable only 25% of Democrats.

“And again, that you have to go to the exact point, what's the American dream to you?”

Right. Dream is a house and a, no, it's not, no, it's got nothing to do with material goods. No, nothing. No. You know, if you follow the American dream, you may get there.

Right. Right. But that's not what it is. It's the opportunity, the freedom gives you. Opportunity.

Yep. Yeah.

again, my whole goal was not to be in college debt.

“So I worked two jobs and went to college.”

Yeah. And took out that college loan, kept it in the bank for four years.

And the first day or the day before, I had to start paying interest on it.

I paid back the entire principle with no interest, and I was able to make the interest on that money over four years. Yeah.

“That's actually what I did with my college loan.”

Right. Yeah. And I was a stupid 18 year old and naive 19 year old and 20 year old. And I still figure that out. Yep.

Some things never change.

Yeah, right. Right. You're right. You're right. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.

We are running radio. He's circling. I'm Gary McNamara.

And I'm looking at this headline and a couple of sentences after below the headline.

I'm like, well, this really may not be parity in controversial decisions Supreme Court rules, words, temporary, and forever are not the same. This is because the temporary protective status in the United States Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 on Tuesday that the words temporary and forever are different. Bucking years of tradition, the courts ruling that two distinct words have two distinct

definitions and cannot be used interchangeably sent ripples through the nation forcing legislators

“to treat a law or a status as temporary if that's what it actually says.”

This is the best part of it. It is part of the Court's official opinion just as Thomas wrote, "Don't you people understand English?" That's more true than parity on it. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.