Think about the 31st Newly!
Why?
Last call for your steuer.
Oh no, I don't know where I'm going to get used to it.
“Because as a steuer, that's how steuer is just a stress.”
Is that easy? Of course, it's almost all automatic. Steuers are long? No, just a little bit. No, then?
Hold it now, then. With this steuer, it's about 31st Newly. Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley, talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day.
Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio.
All across America, we are Red Eye Radio.
He is there, currently, and I'm Gary McNamara. You know, a playlist show, and 30 seconds before the show starts, it all gets blown to heck. Yeah, you know, and that's because Alan, right before I go on the air, hands me a bunch of stuff, and Alan handed me the story.
I didn't even see it. He does this on purpose, by the way. Yes, Liz nature. Liberal, journal. The Atlantic claims the error of the Democrat manly man is back.
I know, it back, back here. This is, is it, it existed at one point? Now, this is from the piece. Now, now, I have to go and find the entire piece. I mean, like I said, I would just just saw this 30 seconds ago.
Yeah, just read it very quickly. Was laughing so hard reading it to you. Yeah, I said, okay, yeah, well, we'll get, don't worry. We'll get to everything, but here it is. All right.
Brian Pointexter had just finished wolfing down a Ruben sandwich in a deli outside Cleveland. Wolfing. Yes, all right. When he delivered the message that coming from a Democrat house candidate in the year 2026, sounded almost provocative.
There's nothing wrong with being masculine. Pointexter told me, it's okay. He said to be a manly man. Yeah, I mean, if you are one. Yeah, but you have to define it.
Now, here's the point. If they can't define what a woman is, they can't define what a man is.
“How do you define the manly in the man if you can't define what a man is?”
Well, not all, because in terms of persons who are manly, they're not all men. Yes, exactly. Right. That's a great point. Are all manly men actually men?
No, because no, here's where they get themselves in trouble. That's transphobic. No, I'm taking from their own playbook. Of course. Because if a biological female is a manly, is it wrong to call her manly manly?
You know, you know, it's a very handsome woman over there, you know, it's how do you approach that I want to see them at their own convention when they're talking, right? When they're sitting around talking, well, we need manly men.
Well, hold on a second, masculinity is toxic.
Exactly. That's what I was told, right? In fact, I think there's a lawsuit against it against masculinity, because it's, you know, because of the toxicity, it's creating problems. And the other by the way, there was a big, where I get super rigs this year.
And the name of the big rig was a masculine toxicity, or toxic masculinity actually. Yeah, and so it's actually the reverse sounds cool too. But here's the problem, their own rulebook. This is what we've been saying forever. Their rulebook changes by the second.
You can't be manly. He's a stay at home, yeah. You know, the kind that doesn't shave ever, you know, anywhere. This is put drama bottoms all day. You know what I mean?
And he's taking care of the kids. And by kids, I mean, too, Joao, well, they don't have children. They have, they have dog children. But my point is, whoever goes through life thinking of those things.
“I don't know, I don't think I've ever walked through life going, you know?”
I'm not looking at my life. And I've got to get rid of the cat. Yeah, well, and the box going. Yeah. And the, and the, and the box.
I need to get rid of the cat and the boxed wine.
And the multiple colors around your pool. Kind of looks like a rainbow.
“I'm just, because I'm not, I'm not, I'm not just there's anything wrong with it.”
But, but, but I mean, that, who, I've, I've never spent one second analyzing my life.
Oh, I have. Man, production, just, then just join the Democratic Party. Why don't you? I've never spent, I don't think, one second analyzing my, I mean, I've analyzed myself, you know, when I, especially when I was, you know, younger and
much more foolish did I do the right thing. Yeah. But I'm think I've ever went through life one day going, you know, the last year, I haven't been manly enough. Uh, trying to think.
Now, you might have, because, you know, you were into that whole, you know, very masculine, heavy metal thing for a while.
I don't know that, you know, a lot of that turn less than masculine.
You know, they're trying to call it metal. Sorry, the guys in poison were prettier than the, the, the spacer also. It was, I was like, wait a minute, what? I mean, they were pretty in pink.
“No, they, they, they, they, they dolled it up, they, they, they, they have you make up?”
No, you know, for, for me, it was, am I going to be strong enough to lift the mail out of the mailbox and bring it, bring it in? That's the question. That's my level of fitness goal, you know, if, if, and I remember one, one time years ago, I joined a gym and it was right after I moved to the big city.
I, but I joined a gym and they said, well, okay, we're going to take you around, you know, some guy named Thor, he's going to take me out here around. He's going to show me where everything is. He's going to show me how to use everything.
Well, the first thing they do is they start you on legs, right?
He's going, he's going to give you one free, you know, coaching and they start you on legs. And of course, that's the worst place to start anyone. Because then, you know, people like me, you can't walk for two years. And, you know, I, he said, well, what's your, what's your, what's your fitness goal? Basically, not to die.
I just want to, you know, I don't want to, I'd like to not be 700 pounds. And I'd like to not die. I'm not looking to be, you know, whatever. I, all these mirrors you got around here, they, they mean nothing to me. I'm not looking in the mirror.
I don't, for me, I were black t-shirts and jeans all the time. Only because I get dressed in the dark. I like colorful clothes. Yeah, I like that. Now, here's, here's more from the article, all right?
Yeah. Yeah. Point dexter's, let me start again, in case anybody missed it. Brian, point dexter, it just finished. Wolfing down a Rubin sandwich in a deli, they need to make the article masculine.
Rubin to the right in a deli outside Cleveland when he delivered the message coming from a Democrat house candidate in the year 2026, sounding almost provocative. There's nothing wrong with being masculine point dexter told me, change your last name. It's okay, he said, to be a really annoying man.
“Like, my friends, you need to change that last name.”
It leeks my last name's hardly. At least it sounds like a motorcycle, point dexter. And you're trying to be manly. Point dexter's own manliness credentials are fully in order. So apparently this writer and the Atlantic has his definition of a manly man,
a stereotypical manly man, here we go. The 46-year-old started working in a machine shop as a teenager. Oh, hey, hey, I did. It's been years hauling furniture across the country before finding stability as a union iron worker. Hey, I was a steel worker.
All right, he drives a ram big horn pickup truck and built with his buddy, turn campaign manager, a shed in his backyard. All right, he's on point now. Now point dexter's running for Congress trying to flip a Republican held seat in Ohio with the pitch aimed at a constituency that has abandoned the Democratic Party over the past two decades.
Men critiques such as point dexter's have jelled into a consensus over the past two years, repeated at nauseam by Starchie Senators and governors with an eye towards running for president in 2028 closing the gender gap now seems to be the official electoral strategy of Democrats a couple of months ago. I got a call from a party operative who pitched a story on the Democrats effort to win back
the Manelsphere, the operative ran through a list of half-dust candidates and key house districts
Who are engaged in culture who are engaged.
I'm not kidding you who are engaged culturally in male spaces. A bit of gobbler cook that I took to mean manly men or perhaps guys, guys, but that also reflects a sort of distance that points to the depths of the party's problem. After all, an iron worker probably wouldn't describe himself as engaging culturally in males.
That's the whole thing, because it makes me wonder, you know, are you, you know, all right,
“here's the thing, you say you're an oyster farmer but you're an oyster farmer for your mom.”
I mean, you're not really an oyster farmer. You're just going out to get some oysters for your mom. Well, I mean, after the Wall Street Journal article, the other day, you know, the whole thing that white collar workers, men, you know, like, you know, it's a masculine thing to make sure the lawn is cut, you know, the lawn is a new status right in a symbol and level that you've got
to achieve. And I mentioned my adult obsession with edging that came from my mother. Right. Yeah. So, does that make me to go back to a word that I used to a couple of weeks ago? Does that make me a manly man or a femme? Yeah, I just think it makes you a momma's boy, you know, and that there's nothing wrong with that, femme.
Yeah, it's femme, yeah, it's a femme, all right. You know, it's so funny, I'll ask you, I'll ask you, are you properly chewing your food? Because if you're not, 30 times with each bite, okay. Yeah, yeah, definitely.
What's so funny about this is he sings never run through my mind. They never run through our minds.
“We just, we live life the way we live life. Well, here's the thing, it never, like, I mentioned my last”
name, right, Harley, you know, and, you know, it's Harley. Yeah. And so, you know, people, oh man, cool last name, oh, yeah, it's fine. But I always get they, oh, do you, oh, no Harley, do you ride or it's, it's every, every time. And they mean well, these are well-meaning people, you know, oh, what's your last name, Harley? Oh, do you, oh, no, let me know. Let me ask you this. Yeah, you know, since we've now started to, you know, really, today is the start of,
no, yesterday was the start of our 20 second year. Well, yesterday was the anniversary,
so we were beginning our 20 second year. Right. So, this is the second day into our 22nd year.
Yeah. Is it true one time with a management in the far past? Yes, that there was another co-host that they tried to give him the stage name of David's Davidson. So it would be the Harley
“and David's Davidson. Yes, that was actually presented in an executive meeting. Well, then see,”
they were worried about the show been to Femi. The person had been on the show for months or ready like six or eight months already. And all the sudden, well, we lied to you. His name's not this. It's Davidson. Really? It's Harley Davidson. They were trying to build up the testosterone manly man image of the show. Well, you know, I mean, you know, because their name stories are, we, you know, when people ask me about the motorcycle, I'm like, you know, I don't want to have to
live up to that because I'm not, you know, if I was related to the, you know, William S. Harley, and I might be, you know, I didn't heck if I know, my nephew works for the company. That's all, that's all I can tell you. But I actually, I'm going back to the idea of thinking about going out of your way to project this masculinity. You're, you're, if you're working too hard at it, it tells me that's really your focus is your imagery, not the actual work you're doing.
I just love it, though, the, that would have, and that, I got to admit the writer in the Atlantic makes a great point. And they're more, the liberal publication. Yeah. But to sit there and say, well, you call yourself a, you know, an iron worker, steel worker kind of guy. And then you talk about engaging culturally and male spaces. Yeah, probably you're just destroyed that point. Well, because stereotypical. If you're engaging, if you're truly engaging in male spaces,
well, first of all, I have to, one, there is everyone wearing a shirt. No, you can make
it, but, but also, you can make the case if you're saying I engage culturally in male spaces
That you're gay.
and wearing no shirt. You know, are you, what's this, what's going, what's one kind? And I don't
know that I need to know the answer. That's the whole thing is that they go out of their way to project this. Do they workshop this? Is there a meeting? No, no, I mean, they're talking. No, they all, they get together. They're trying to figure out how to do it. So they have meetings on how to be more manly men. Yes. Right. Right. Here's an idea. When you, for example, when, when, uh, you know, I was, uh, well, I couldn't say it this way. Well, I have to say it this way.
If I want to be a manly man. Right. I was a machinist and I was a steel worker. Uh-huh.
“You have to use that kind of, that's a man more manly kind of boy. Right. I played guitar drums and”
bass in a metal band. No, no, no, you've got to say with more harshness. No, no, that's how you talk
when you're in a metal band. Uh-huh. You don't, you don't do the, yeah. Well, you're right, you're, you're, you're right on that because the, I can't think of his name at the moment, his name because the, the, the, the, it's lead guitarist for Metallica doesn't talk that way. Yeah. No, no, James Hadfield, the singer doesn't talk that way. Yeah. And in fact, none of the guys really kind of talk that you, you just, you know, they, it's, are you saying you can throw stereo types out
the window that's, uh, stereo typing people to win an election based on gender and/or sex. If you're worried about that, you've got a big problem. Yeah. You too. If, if, because, you know, that's it. When, when someone appeals to a voter base in this case, you'll know it. Yeah. You won't have to, to build all of that to bring it out there. The vetting process itself is a process. But you'll know it soon enough. And, you know, like,
and we don't know any allegations of point extra in terms of platinum type allegations. There's nothing, no reason to believe that any of that's going on. But still, if you're working that hard, you know, because tell me in your male spaces, what a man is. What are you talking to your buddies
“about? We are what I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert”
at JJ Keller. Drivers must always be prepared for a roadside inspection. This means drivers should
always have their personal vehicle and company credentials organized and ready. The top two violations written against drivers every year are log general form and manner and log not current. Both are completely avoidable if the driver keeps the log accurate, compliant, and current at all times. Having the vehicle ready for inspection involves the driver conducting daily inspections and making sure any problems that are discovered are immediately corrected. Vehicle readiness
also requires the company to make sure that the vehicle is current on all scheduled maintenance and that the maintenance schedule is adequate. This will make sure the driver is being given a sound vehicle to start with. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, told free at 866. Might be Red Eye.
We are when I radio, he's our front and I'm Gary McNamara. I would hate to be a liberal error because I mean, just going through what we just went through then and by the way, none of those are our thoughts. We're just, we're just, we're analyzing what Democrats think. Now, this is the playbook that we're going from. It's too much work. No, you know, that's the thing. When the playbook, when the rule book changes every day,
what do you do? How do you do that? Because now, again, masculinity was toxic not too long ago.
“Now, we need more masculinity in their party. That's what they're saying. Not only masculinity.”
Uh-huh. We need manly masculinity. Wow. That's double. Well, no, that's true. That's the way they phrase. That's double secret. You toxic masculinity probation. You women who are masculine. Sorry. Bitch. We don't need you in the party. I guess.
Scrolling with Hayland.
there's a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram, on TikTok, cutting through the clutter. One hot take
“at a time. Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before”
to say hello. I love the chat interaction. Thank you for helping. But I do it to get all of the videos and all of the content that you won't find anywhere else. Scrolling with Hayland. Dissearch that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. Which that I still was. And do not embarrass the entire country. Now, I can go back. I can get
there fast, lose tonight, and you got a real problem. Do not blow it. The gym room show podcast.
You've been warned. If I would listen on your favorite platform. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Wave Leaf Factory Studio. We are Red Eye Radio. And he is heartbroken. I'm hearing Matt Nemara. Welcome in good morning. One thing that we wanted to get to because we were vacation last week. And I was singing about this on the way to work. I go, oh man, we got to wear dresses.
And this is where the Democrats were last week. As you know, there's been a couple of more incidents of of ice agents shooting at illegal immigrants or people that they believe are endangering their lives. As we know, shooting at them. And I did see last week. And I can't
“remember which Democrat it was that was saying, because that happens, we should get rid of ice.”
And the first thought that I came to my mind as well when an illegal immigrant killed someone,
well, then shouldn't we get rid of illegal immigration? Right. If you're trying to make that, if you're trying to make that point. Right. But the the whole premise is bogus to begin with. Any law enforcement agent, whether it's ice, a police officer, we know what happens when you pull out your gun and shoot it somebody whether you killed them or not. It's all investigated. Yeah. You go through the investigated process to make sure that it was a clean shooting
and it should. Right. And if it is not a clean shooting, that's where prosecutors should get
“involved based on the evidence of each particular case. But to compare”
a law enforcement officer involved in a shooting and make the moral equivalency of that to an illegal immigrant murdering an innocent American citizen is absolutely reprehensible. Well, and it's again, any opportunity they can see to demonize. And again, we don't know all the particulars in cases we're talking about. We know the claims from both sides. The driver of the van was, you know, using the van and going toward the agent.
And then the media came back and said, no, the people in the van said that wasn't true. There's a reason there's an investigation. If any officer or agent uses deadly force, as you mentioned, there has to be an investigation, a thorough investigation. And if something wrong was done, whether deliberately or by mistake, and the proper actions have to go into effect, that's the way it is saying that we need to abolish all of it, because something happened,
doesn't make any sense at all. Otherwise, we should just outlaw driving. Yeah, that's another point outlaw driving. If these things happen outlaw driving, tens of thousands of people die every year behind the wheel, 30 to 40,000. So, but to make the moral equivalency, if you're going to make that moral equivalency, when then you've got to say, well, because illegal immigrant criminals exist in our society, we should get rid of sanctuary cities.
If you're going to be consistent in your argument that you need to defund the...
you need to, because this is where the Democrats are going. And, you know, defund the military,
you know, you see what the Democrats are doing right now with the Pentagon, with intelligence, you know, with everything else, trying to defund it. That's their point. If something is done, if something is done wrong, or we believe something is done wrong, get rid of the police, this is where the Democratic Socialist of America are going. They're up front with it. They want to defund the police, but I get rid of the police, they want to get rid of the military,
they want to get rid of border patrol, they want to get rid of ICE, the Senate, they want to get rid of the Senate. And by the way, more people are coming out saying,
“you're not going to get rid of this. You have to change the entire constitution,”
you have to get rid of the constitution in order to do it, which is really the goal. That's their
point. That's the point. And it's something. And they keep talking about this because what they're doing is they're there because when something doesn't work, especially when it doesn't work in their favor, but if there's some kind of mistake or anomaly or whatever in the process, then do away with it all. And this has been for a long time the goal of the left, do away with the constitution. And they're the ones who were having the no kings rallies,
they're the ones calling Trump a dictator because how would you, how would you manage with no defense, none, no military, you would have no border patrol, you would have no police.
“So how would it be managed? Well, I mean, it would be, you know, like out of that movie where you”
could commit crimes, you know, and, you know, for the one day, I can't forget the name of the movie, but you could just go out and just boom, the purge, the purge. Yeah. There was, there was, they made it, I don't know if they made a series or made up another purge movie or something, permanent purge or something, they called it. And it would be that, it would be a permanent purge, but wait, you can't have that because how many people would, if you have no law enforcement,
you have no laws. So right, because if they can't enforce laws, there aren't no laws. Right, there aren't no laws. So nothing is enforceable. People die and then one has to happen inevitable, while the state has to step in and they have to have the state police. And I don't mean the, each state having their police, the federal police. Oh, wait a minute, didn't we just get rid of them, didn't we just get rid of ice agents? No, no, no, no, no, this would be acting based on
who's authority because Congress would control the house, would control everything. They would control what the White House does, which, then why would you have a White House? This,
this is never going to happen, but this is where the lack of logic. These are not even children.
These are children because children are capable of learning. These people are morons. They're not capable of learning at all. They're complete morons and they're still winning elections. You know, I was thinking, I had a lot of thoughts on my way to work tonight. So you know, the other public and should have a no Nazi rally. Yeah, but the fact is, everybody would be laughing and smiling.
Right, you know, and they'd be laughing, but remember the Tea Party. I remember when people were happy
“at the Tea Party rallies, the first Tea Party rallies, remember that in 2009.”
And people were, you know, the March, the Tea Party March and DC and it was, what was it? And hints of violence, I think, is the way they put it on NBC News. There were hints of that. They didn't even leave trash behind. You know, you know, and I remember, remember, it was, it was Palm Beach. Remember the election hero and the Republicans were all there in 2000. Yeah. And it was like, the violent and they had the cameras there and everybody just
didn't like everybody's laughing. Yeah, they're all laughing. They're in them. It was like, it was no hint of of anything to be, to be a fearful of. But, you know, when you see the no, you can actually make the case for no Nazis. You can actually make the case for Republicans aren't going to bother with it. Right. But, you know, but it's, they look at it and they just, you know,
As we look at it, we go, the no kings was so stupid.
because anybody with a brain could sit there and say, what do you mean no kings? I mean, what,
what are you talking about? You know, I was thinking the other thing too, because we were talking about that article and the Atlantic about the whole manly, the, the manly man that they're looking for now in the Democratic Party and the one, the one candidate, point extra, point extra in Ohio, yeah, in Cleveland about how they're defining him as a manly man because he built a shed with a machinist and an iron worker. So he's a manly man and a manly man engages culturally in male
“spaces and even at the Atlantic said, probably not how you should define a manly man. But I started”
thinking, are they now redefining it because the whole point of, well, this guy, you know, the
oyster farmer for his mother and a Nazi, that's really was the oyster farmer, the, the, the military and the Nazi that was giving him Democrat street cred as a manly man. And I think in this, they're, they're now looking go, okay, we've got to redefine this. We can't have a Nazi, we cannot have a Nazi definition for what we view as a manly man. Right, I mean, I wonder if they had that thought. No, I mean, I, I think there, I think there's something to that. Yeah. I, I think it's, I, I think
they go again. They go through their own rulebook and they're changing everything on the fly
because why? Because certain things aren't working. They're not appealing to certain demographics.
“It now, again, as I mentioned, they're still winning elections. Yeah. But you have to look at”
the erosion of their base based on what we've talked about for years. Identity politics, which means you belong to a new subgroup tomorrow, which means everyone in your group yesterday is now an oppressor because you're in a different subgroup. They're your oppressor now. And we're seeing that, you know, we used to call that the liberal circular firing squad, but now it's gotten so much worse. Is that now, after reading the Atlantic article and seeing the manly man Mr. Pointexter,
is that a new gender? Manly man is the manly man, a new gender. Does that expand the number of genders? Which I don't know. I saw one the other day that there was like 77 out. Well, is a manly man now a new gender? Is he good? If they bring, can a manly man as we asked the question earlier? Can a manly man gender be a transgender man? Right. Yeah. I mean, we have to include that,
“like I said, we mentioned earlier, but you have to include that. And how do you include it?”
Can a cis woman be a manly man? Right. These are all the important questions because of what Democrats have brought up over the last couple of decades. These are just questions that we would like answers to. Well, because of a biological female, the lives as a man is a transgender male biological female transgender male at what level do they qualify for manly? I'm asking them. Yeah. Yeah. And I know what you're saying, guys, you're being ridiculous. That's our point.
Yeah, we know. The whole damn thing is ridiculous. It's stupid. It's moronic. And none of them are talking about what they will do for you to improve your lives, what they're talking about and the promises they're making and the very foundation of the Democratic Socialist of America is to ruin your life. Not to improve it. What are they doing? What's on that list that improves people's lives every day? American citizens. Free stuff.
Not going to happen. Not going to happen. No police. That only. No billionaires. Well, I mean, if your life will be better, if there's no billionaires. No police. What are you trying to appeal to felons? They can't vote? Well, they're trying to change that state. This, this would be again. Look, who were they trying to actually? Well, no, that's a great idea. Somebody need. Hey, Republicans, ask that question. Who are you trying to? They say defund the police. Who are they
Trying to help?
care about? Why, why would I vote for you? Right. Who are you appealing to? What's the, what's
“the point? What are you going to replace it with? Because masculine men like cops and military.”
The fact. Manly. Yeah, I'm telling you, it's just it's just we're now two days into our 22nd year. Yeah. It's as much fun as ever. It is. These are idiots. We are right. I radio. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley. It's Red Eye Radio. We're running with you. He is our Crony and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome and good morning. So
I think we're done with the manly man stuff. I don't know for the, for at least for the day. I don't know for the day. It might come back up tomorrow. If there's other commentary on it,
“I just, it would just be too tough for me to be a liberal. There's too many things you have to”
consider. All I have to consider now is what my opinion is. You know, I don't. Yeah, but I know anything else. That's my point. That's it. It's just focus on what I believe and then let all the other stuff just kind of fly by and my selling my ideas with with the proper identity politics behind it. What do you believe? What do you want to do? Out to the hour news is brought to you by how product is at how products.com.
This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. Now it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Carley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Carley and I'm Gary McNamara.
Hello. Hi. So that was in two. Manly men there. Comments where we said that we should say hello and welcome to the show for Manly men. Alison, we don't care if you're like the show or not. We're busy doing things building stuff. I got a hammer. I got a. You know if I had a hammer, you know, when would you hammer? I would hammer in the morning. Really? I would hammer in the evening. I'd hammer all over this
“land. Oh, okay. That's sort of inclusive. Yeah. But but you need to you definitely need to stop”
when it's hammer time. That's what I was told. Well, you know yesterday was it an amazing how
all of a sudden the, you know, for a couple of really for the last month you saw because trumpet brought it up before and it was like all you heard was daylight savings, daylight savings and man it came to a big, halting stop yesterday. Didn't it shocked? It was like boom. He's like, what? Like, and then they said, I don't care. It doesn't affect my life. But we have talked about the fact that did you see places in North Dakota? It'll be well after nine o'clock like 92930 before
the sun. Yeah. I was sunrise. Did I save that? No, I, I, I mentioned that yesterday I didn't mention it was exactly where it was, but in some areas that would be after nine a.m. before the sun rises. By the way, I'm all right with that. That's the thing. I'm not a farmer. I don't have kids in school. I care about children, mostly. But no, I, I don't, look, when it comes to kids, safety third. Okay. But no, it's, it's that everybody has a solid point on both sides. This is where the
both sides thing actually comes in because you're not, this is why you're never going to change it.
You know, whoever once, whatever for whatever reason, whichever one they want. Yeah, but I,
You, but you, you don't understand, but it's, no, I get it.
look, let's compromise. We'll change it 30 minutes. Yeah. Yeah. I, that's what I would love to,
you know, again, go an hour and seven minutes and just, just hours today. Well, it just, I mean, Tom Cotton has said already, you know, we had talked about a yesterday that, that, uh, Cotton and Thun said, well, this isn't ever going to get through the Senate. No, it's not going to happen. So it's, so it's, it's basically what, what, the message I got yesterday and was something changes,
“this thing's done in a rival. Yeah. Yeah. Because you're, here's the thing.”
You have, you have the momentum in terms of the rank and file, right, the public of, let's stop changing the clocks. There's momentum then. And then you asked the question, okay, which one do we go with? Yeah. And that's where it begins. And that's also where it ends,
because it will never be solved. It, it's a valid point for farmers. It's a valid point for people
in North Dakota all 17 of them. What's the population of North Dakota? Very small. But it's, you know, it's, let me see, right now, population is 100 when you add the out of state oil workers 20 million. 20 million. No, but there's another thing. You know, it's a, it's a productive state. It's, you know, you, you think about, but, you know, the farmers, they're trying to be productive. They're getting up at 3 a.m. so they can get out there as soon as the sun lets them. I mean,
they're out there probably doing many chores in the dark already. You know, how do you get that done?
“Um, sometimes you have to cab and the, and the, and the dark, you know, if you're a rancher,”
sorry, if that, if that, uh, calf is ready to come out, it's time. But kids go into school. That's a genuine concern. I live, as I mentioned, just a few houses down from the elementary where, where three of my four kids went, um, that's how long I've lived there. And that's actually how long it took them to finish elementary school. Um, but my, my grants on one of my grandchildren is actually attending that school. And so I'm, it's very active, right? It's, it's right there. I'm in,
I live inside of schools. And there are children still that walk is this most adorable couple of kids. One is an older kid. Looks like he's probably in middle school. It goes to pick up his brother and they live in nearby apartments. It looked, I think, that's where they're headed. But he's walking with him every day after school. Uh, and I see it a few times, probably a few times a week during school year if I'm running errands. Um, but you'd see all these kids walking and, and there,
and there's a six lane road. They have to cross. You know, um, there's tons of cars, people dropping their children off with their cars, pulling into the parking lot. It gets very dangerous. It's dangerous in daylight. So people who are making the case of, you know, kids having to go to school in the dark. You know, I mean, these are all valid points, which is why you're not politically,
you'll never get it done. And if, if you could buy, I don't know, some weird set of circumstances,
all of a sudden, it happens, the moment it happens, lobbyists will be back there on Capitol Hill, and it will change back pretty quickly. I can't tell you when. What I thought was interesting is because this is the, we went through all the discussion yesterday about the practicality of it either way. And I don't care. It doesn't affect my life. I understand both sides points. But would got to me as how over the last month, month and a half. How you only heard one side.
It's like, people don't pay attention until it passes. And then it goes to the Senate. And then it was just a dead stop. Yeah. You didn't hear really. I didn't hear any opposition over the last month and a half. I know. It looked like it, which made it what the stories made it look like it was going to happen. This is good. This thing was going to happen. Here it is. It's going to go through. And I mean,
“and it just took a dead stop yesterday. That's what I thought is fascinating. It's all of a sudden”
people started paying attention going, well, wait a minute. I don't want that. Well, yes, we need to
Change it.
changing every year. But which way it goes, depending on who you survey, can be 5545. Right.
And so it's just not. And in the Senate, the margin is so slim. The thing, if you think about it,
“what you're looking at is what the each state will do. Right. And that's what you're looking at.”
So the Senate, obviously, representing states, they're looking at it going, we've got, you know, industry, we've got teachers associations or whatever is behind it. The lobbyists that are behind it. And they're going to, and that they're going to be hearing from those lobbyists from those states in the house. They're hearing from it in their districts. But you can get a little
bit looser in the house than you can with something like this, specifically, as it addresses
what the states would be able to do with their time zones and how it would affect industry, which and and effect schools, because if you start thinking about this, all right, we'll just change the school hours to later in the morning. Well, in North Dakota, you mean, start at 930? I mean, kids, I'm sure they'd love it. But what about the parents that still have to be to work at eight? The biggest thing I saw yesterday was most people did not know. They thought that it would be a
“federal law that every state was to abide by daylight savings. And that's not the law. That's what”
I saw before. Oh, I thought that was the law. And the law basically says, no, if you wish to, if you wish
to go to daylight saving all year, you can do that. But if you wish to continue to switch, that's fine. The states can first. Or if you wish to go to standard, then you got the you patchwork, you can imagine the patchwork. And the people said, we didn't, oh, we didn't know this was the law. We thought it was, okay, we're going to do daylight saving. But and the funny thing is that the the number of people on social media yesterday that we're telling other people,
this law, the law cannot change the amount of time that the sun actually shines on me for years. I mean, it was, I've been saying this, I've said this over and over again every time we talk to about it. You cannot regulate how much sun we're going to get. There's no way to do that. It's about all right, when the sun is going to rise or set. Look, I get it in the winter. You know, the further north you go, you know, the sun is setting at 430, 5 o'clock. You know,
it's just, it's crazy. But when you look at, again, everything, every interest that's involved,
“that's why politically there's no way to get this done. And what would it be? What would it look”
like? You know, if you have in each time zone, you know, different states, you know, half of the states are staying with it. Others aren't, oh my gosh. Well, okay, what's the current Omaha time? I mean, you know, I mean, it's and and one can't cities have the right to say, no, we're going to change it and we're going to change it two hours. Wait a minute. You know, if a man can be a woman because a man says so, why can't I legally set my own time? Well, Alan Jackson did. It's five o'clock somewhere.
Dusty sleigh, the comedian has a great bit on that because he talks about it. It's half as noon. So it's five and then he said later, it's five o'clock somewhere. He goes, no, it might be five 30 somewhere. He does a great breakdown. Dusty sleigh, you got to check him out. So why can't I as an individual set my own time? I want it to be the time that I want it to be. And hey, I saw that the one woman talking about the Democratic Socialist of America,
and one of the representatives said, under socialism, you don't have to show up for work every day. Right. I'm thinking to myself, what socialism are you dealing with? No, exactly. What do you think? I mean, you don't just, you don't just show up for yourself. You don't show up for work. Why can't I have my own time? Why can't I just say, hey, I'm Gary McNamara and a week, we come in at one minute after 12 and one minute later, we leave because to me, time moves at quickly and we can go home. I identify
that as a 24 hour workday and I get over time. Yes. Yes. Why? Your, your minutes. How dare you project on to me what a minute mean this? Mr. Scientist, Mr. Neil de Crasse Tyson. Well, I'm a minute
Manly man.
A minute's a long time, but here's the thing. Yeah, in order to get that joke, you had to listen to the
“first hour. Yeah. And also probably have to, so anyway, you're never, they do this, it seems like we go”
through this once a year. Ah, we're going to do it this time. Oh, I know. We're going to do it this time. We're here this, we're here in this as much as we hear succession is California going to secede, whatever happened in the Texas Session movement, that sort of ended. Nobody wanted my deal. My deal was we secede from the union. Uh-huh. We annex Mexico. Uh-huh. We gather all of our energy together. We become the energy superpower and we rename ourselves Texaco. Well, nobody seems
to want to go along with that during the Biden years. We did annex Mexico. It happened for four
years. No. Uh-huh. They annexed us. Oh, that's right. No. The fact that you was central America. But you, I mean, seriously, if, if you, if you look at at the ridiculous nature,
“uh, it's nothing as ridiculous about the points people were making, you know, they'll have”
valid points, but the ridiculous nature of how Congress works, thinking, you know, and making people because in the house, as you mentioned, for days, it sounded like this thing was going to happen this time. And I'm, and I'm shaking my head. Nope. It ain't going to happen. It ain't going to happen. I said it the other night on the air. It's not going to happen. It ain't going to happen. And it's not going to happen. Because you get into it are senators who represent. Now, here's the
thing. If we get rid of the Senate. Then maybe we can get it done. Well, I was talking about that yesterday, you know, because because you, you look at, you know, how the, the, the, the house is viewed as, you know, the, the, the people's legislative body. Yeah. And they're very much reactionary as you saw. Right. It was like, we're going to do this. We're going to do this. Yeah. Yeah. It's just boom by. Yes. And victory is our cry. Right. Daylight savings time. Senate stops.
Yeah. Like food is like, how about no. I mean, it was just, it was over before it all began. It really was because you and I have been doing this for one time. We know. And this, this whole debate has come up. It seems like every year for years now. And again, that would point to each side, which means you're not going to get to a conclusion. It's just not going to happen. We are right. I radio this morning's USDA farm report is brought to you by house products tested,
trusted, guaranteed since 1920, temporary support for eligible beef processing facilities. The emphasis of USDA's recently announced, strengthening processing for U.S. Ratchers, spur program. Designed to support cattle producers by supporting small and medium sized processors.
Farm production at conservation under secretary Richard Fordys says up to $500 million
a payments are available for eligible processors. The spur program will be administered by the farm service agency. But the under secretary says not in the traditional sets. It will not be done through the county office system. But it will actually be implemented from here in Washington. Farm service agency will get numbers from the food safety inspection service. We will know the number of heads that have gone through a particular plant. And then we will contact that processor,
make them aware of their eligibility, make them aware of what that support might look like. And then there'll be a pre-filled application that they'll be able to sign and will be able to participate in the program. I broadband reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senax Fughals and Loops. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.
We're Red Eye Radio. He is our currently and I'm Gary McNamara. You know, I just I mentioned that the one representative of the Democrat Socialist of America that Jonathan Turley had written
“the D.S.A.s. Michaela Brangan explained that with socialism, you can decide if you want to work.”
And when you want to take days off, you will have no debt in a world without capitalism.
Then he says, oh, and the next D.
And then he posted, I thought he was posting her comments. He posted Burl Iv's singing Big Rock Candy
Mountain. Yeah. Yeah. But I did. I did some some searching here and I was able to find you know what she had to say. We'll play a coming up following the bottom of the hour. I least I found some of what she had to say. I'm looking for more on it. But these people are delusional. No, they're completely intelligently. And she and the clip I have that I'll that I'll play. She said, you you don't have to have a job just to pay the bills because you won't have any bills because
everything will be taken care of you. Because there's no not for profit. There's there's
bills in a longer thing because there's not for profit businesses. There's no capitalism. It's gone.
Right. There's no private businesses. Right. The government gets all other revenue and you get what you need. You stand in line and get what you need, which means it will be plentiful and available. You know, like we have it today, you'll walk into super centers where we have
“countless things on the shelves and it will be all for free, right? Because that's how it worked”
in the Soviet Union. We're dealing with children here. We're dealing with more workers. Yeah, we'll we'll get to this coming up.
Catch runny radio live every night on the runny radio app available in the app store.
Read it. I radio. And he is early and I'm Gary McNamara coming up the Democrat Socialist of America and what they think in their own words in just a minute. You know, when it comes to supplements, two things matter the most that it works, of course, and that you can trust it. But rather than just talk about relief factor and tell you about it, let's hear from a customer, another great customer story, Johnny shared with us. That before
relief factor, her husband couldn't open his hands in the morning had to give up playing guitar while that relates to me directly. Oh my gosh. Now he wakes up with flexibility and is back to playing music right on. I love that. He's, you know, in fact, they're both recommending relief factor Johnny and her husband. They're they're talking about relief factor to friends and family and
“talking about this as a way to enjoy the things they love again. That's what I experienced with”
relief factor. They gave me some to try and it changed. My pain was keeping me from doing the things. I love. But you, if you're going to that, I want you to try relief factor. You can get started. The three week quick start 1776. Just go to relieffactor.com or call 800-4 relief and maybe soon we'll be sharing your story right here. When we were on vacation last week and it's funny that so much happened last week that I know we're already the Thursday and still, oh, that's right.
Well, when it came out last week, I'll just win on some vacation. I'm thinking, look at this, everybody's talking about the Democratic Socialist of America now and what they actually plan on doing and I said, we've talked about that two weeks ago and then I went, oh, wait a minute. That was from their convention. They actually put out their policy statement.
“Yeah, and this is good. And that's why there was so much talk and I go, oh, okay,”
they, and this is something that we want to talk about. The last thing that we wanted to do is censor what the Democrat Socialist of America want to do. Right. And this is, I got to tell you, Eric, you know, when you're, I was in my early 30s when I started doing this. Yeah. Yeah. And, you know, at that time, you're like, well, what do you have to say, you know, and so, you would, you would have more tolerance for the crazies.
Well, yeah, when you've done it for decade after decade after decade after decade after decade, it gets to a point where you're like, these people don't have the intelligence of somebody in kindergarten. They have no idea. They have no concept how the world works at all. Right. I knew more in elementary school than they do now. Thank you, mom and dad. Yeah, you know,
That's a big, that's a big part of it.
idea how the real world works. Well, you know, I made, I made the joke yesterday that, you know,
after war war two or during war war two, women came into the workforce. Right.
“And so that kind of expanded the economy. I think it's time we bring children into the”
workforce. And I made the joke with kind of a serious point that, you know, the indoctrination in school at, you know, starting now at four or five years old in preschool is what worries me the most. What if we just put them to work and they learned about the real world right on? You know,
I mean, they'd have to get an apartment of their own, of course. But this is, you know, this is what we
don't teach. Again, good parents do, good mentors do, but these, this entire lineup, this entire policy put out by the DSA. It's not written by children because children would be asking why, why are we doing this? It's written by more on this. Here we go. This is the Democratic Socialist
“of America, Makala, Brandgen, talking about this utopia that you will live in under socialism.”
Are you ready? I'm ready. All right. Here we go. Let's go. And you don't have to have a job just
to pay the bills because you don't have a lot of bills, right? Bills are no longer a thing because
there's not for-profit businesses that are constantly trying to exploit you and trying to, you know, put you into debt. And then you might just have like a normal day, right? Like you could, you could actually have the freedom to move around. And so part of what we're trying to do is dispel the idea that socialism is just about like bureaucracy, meetings, order, or anything like that. It actually is about freedom. It's about people being able to be themselves. It's about people being able
“to actually flourish under a system where they're not constantly being exploited and where they're”
not constantly worried about these basic things that takes to live. If you don't have to worry about the basic things that takes to live, then you can thrive, right? And then you can actually lead your life instead of just survive. Wow. Where do I start? Socialism is about freedom, but you can't have a business. You can't have choices. You can't have choices. You live in this system. There is no, which is the end. If there are no, if nobody makes a profit, why is money worth
anything? It's not. It isn't. It isn't. What gives money value? They have no idea how economics works. None. Zero. Why was the Soviet rubble worth nothing? Oh, productivity. No productivity. And you can't change that dynamic. You can't say, oh no, we can be greatly productive and have all of our choices. And you know, I made the point about the walk into the big box store and just imagine, you would just have, you would just go up to the front and they would just go, okay,
go on home. It's all paid for. Yeah. By the way, you know, and that's the other thing, too. Because it's part of, they, they don't want property rights. Property rights would be gone. Yeah. You just set it right there. There would be no for profit businesses, right, which you know, on you can't have any rentals. Well, well, the whole point is why are there products? If there's no incentive to to build the products? What they're saying is, I'm going to, and what's, and the other
thing is, too, that you can tear it apart. There is no bureaucracy. You know, this isn't about bureaucracy. So government owns everything. Everything is non for profit. Yet there's zero bureaucracy. Right. All it is is. The whole, the whole damn thing is bureaucracy. The because the entire production of everything would be one massive bureaucracy, distribution, the supply chain, the management of it all, everything, every part of it. And, and imagine walking into,
I don't care what Tucker Carlson tried to sell you. Of course, that wasn't during the Soviet Union.
It was in Russia, but it wasn't.
You know, it's, yes, because if, if you want to see the, the, what has kept China going,
it's because China realized they couldn't be pure communist socialist. Right. They can't be that.
“Right. And that's why that's why you can have for profit businesses now in China. That's why”
people can own property. That's why you can own a business. Now, what I want to own a business in China under a government that still believes in communism, but understands they're trying to ride that fine line to see the couple of stories off this week about, you know, China, you know, doesn't know what to do because, you know, the, the central planning doesn't work. When you
try to make central planning with capitalism, you're always going to have problems. Well, hey,
we, we, you see what we're doing here in the United States. Yeah. You know, where, I mean, even, it's only, I think $30 billion right now, but it's much easier to sell socialism when the guy who calls himself a conservative president Trump believes that the government should have equity
“and corporations. Yeah. It's much easier to sell socialism and communism when both sides”
agree that it should happen, but to what extent is far different on one side. It's already billion in the other side. It's everything. Well, that's it. And, and, and here's the, you know, the massive driver, you know, it's, it's incentivized. We're in the, I, gig work area or, or era. And that's when people can say, all right, I can go make a little, a few extra bucks on my own time. Or if there's someone in the home that's not working for whatever
reason, but they can do those gig works. And it's, what's weird is I've studied the, the, the kind of, algorithm that they have and how the ones who are actually making the most, take advantage of everything that's available to them. They're not doing just one. They're working for three or four delivery app companies and they're, you know, making, you know, it's, they're not going to get rich doing it, but they're making extra money or maybe extra money for the household.
And that is right there when you, when you look at it in California, you said, oh, no, you've got to make them employees. You do that. You destroy the business model. Because you need contractors who are willing to do it, are there flaws in the way that some of these delivery drivers are paid or what they're paid and, and the business model in general, and how do attract more of those drivers in order to get your, you know, the entire thing going
“and keep the whole thing going? Yes. Are there business models that you have to adjust constantly?”
Constant capitalism, but we're not Amazon, but that isn't even the discussion. No, no, the discussion is you could not be an Uber driver. That's, that's my, you wouldn't be in which is what I'm getting to. You choose to do that because hey, I can do this on my own time. It's my own thing. If it doesn't work out, I can go do something else. If I want to do more, I can do more. You can't make a profit. And you can't make a profit. We have people coming here from other
countries. You and I have both recently met people here from other countries that were Uber drivers. And the guy I met was here from Cuba has been here for three years and is loving it. He's doing and he says, and I do others. He had, he had two phones going at once, you know, because he's working every angle that he can based on where he is to maximize the money that he can make, that he can earn. You would have none of that. You would have none of that. You couldn't have
your own business. You can't have your own profit as an individual. Right. No, there's no way. You could have a long company, you know, which, you know, again, these guys aren't getting, you know, landscaping or or long companies or small guys. They're not getting rich, you know, but you couldn't have that. Well, when you, when you look at it, when they say every business is a nonprofit business, that's a nonprofit, that the government
would control everything. Right. Non-profit. Well, you're capping the ability to make a profit, which means you're capping the ability of the worker to make more money. Right.
Which means, and the tax rate would be basically you do that with a, in one way to do it,
It was a massive tax rate.
Yeah. But you will have the minimal sustenance and you'll be happy with that. Right. Because
“in, you know, you, the, the, the trade-off is the minimal sustenance that we will give you,”
but your salary will be capped, but the minimal sustenance will, it will be what will take care of you. That's not the United States of America. And also, that's, that's not how free people think the choice of jobs. What you want to do or what your skills are would matter
would be, would be, would be meaningless completely. Would be limited by the state,
what the state wishes to produce. Government would say no, you're going to do this job. We are Red Eye Radio. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, toll free at 8.6, maybe Red Eye. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our Guardian. I'm Gary McNamara. I convinced that the Democrat Socialist of America are bringing back acid into the drug buffet. Yeah. I'm, I'm sorry, but I,
“I just, and I don't think it's micro dosing. No, this is macro dosing. No, I think they're going”
big on this big, big macro dosing. Because it's delusional. Well, it's delusional and it's also filled with so much ignorance. We're going to have a monopoly, a government monopoly, a central planning government monopoly of nonprofit businesses to run an economy. Well, it goes back to Milton
Friedman defined greed. Who's greedy? It's always the other guy who's greedy. Political greed. Is that
not greed? Yeah. You know, and Phil Donner, he'll down a few back in the day. You know, couldn't really debate him at all? Yeah, because the, the, his point was, what's where's greed? Right. You're making a huge assumption that political greed is somehow more moral than economic greed. Right. If you're going to use the word greed, because that would be political greed at its top is the government having full control, but over the people at all, but economic greed, where everything
is voluntary. Right. It's not political greed, which is forced. Right. Yeah. This is Riddai, Radio. On Westwood 1. The United States soccer Federation presents the U.S. soccer podcast. The place we're at, Megan Klingerart, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything
“that you need to know for this summer's World Cup. How special is it that we've been able to”
follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of emotion. You can feel the intensity white a bit of time, energy effort, everything along the way on these guys, making a country proud, and I think they were the song. The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel, and listen on your favorite platform, scrolling with Hayley. I'm Hayley Carrini. I scrolled with the homies here in the live chat, because there was a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok or
cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time. Love seeing you all of the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction, thank you for helping, but I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else, scrolling with Hayley, to search that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
