Red Eye Radio
Red Eye Radio

07-16-26 Part Two - A Socialist Utopia

3h ago37:465,546 words
0:000:00

In part two of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, we replay the audio from Democratic Socialist McKayla Brangan describing an utopian society, where there are no bills to pay and no res...

Transcript

EN

[MUSIC]

>> Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from

politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting

your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios, this is Red Eye Radio. >> All the cross America, we are Red Eye Radio, he is our crawling on Gary McNamara. I just want to play the audio cut one more time that we had played last hour, and this is the Democratic Socialist of America, Michaela Brangin, talking about the great utopia, where there's no problems with everybody.

>> It's not everybody is happy because the government owns all businesses, they're all non-for-profit. >> It's a utopia. >> Here we go, here we go. >> And you don't have to have a job just to pay the bills because you don't have a lot

of bills, right, bills are no longer a thing because there's not for-profit businesses that are constantly trying to exploit you and trying to put you into debt.

And then you might just have like a normal day, right, like you could actually have the freedom

to move around. And so part of what we're trying to do is dispel the idea that socialism is just about like bureaucracy, meetings, order, or anything like that, it actually is about freedom. It's about people being able to be themselves. It's about people being able to actually flourish under a system where they're not constantly

being exploited and where they're not constantly worried about these basic things that takes to live. If you don't have to worry about the basic things that takes to live, then you can thrive, right, and then you can actually lead your life instead of just survive. How many contradictions are in there?

Oh, my God. When you hear the contradict, you can be free, but you can't have a for-profit business. You're not going to be constantly exploited. And that's the other thing too. See, that's how they view it.

I'm not exploited by any business. No, I choose to do business. It's a voluntary action. Right.

Everything that I do in life is voluntary in the United States.

The closest that came to exploiting me is when they wanted to name a former co-host Davidson. It's like early Davidson. I'm not the only one. I'm not that kind of Harley guy.

And that was not me. Yeah. No, it was. And Harley McNamara is a horrible motorcycle name for the company. Oh, yes, it would be, yes, it would be.

But it's hilarious when you're not won't be exploited by these for-profit businesses here. But when she talks about freedom, but you can't have a business. You can't make a profit. That means you're capped individually, but where she's completely clueless. And so many liberals and Democrats are.

They have no idea even people that call themselves conservatives. Yeah, they're not conservative. And they don't know how an economy works. Right. You know, you look at even when Trump put all the tariffs on and then was blindsided that

he nearly just destroyed the economy with the bond market and had a back off immediately. What was that? Within a couple of days. Yeah. When they put the tariffs on, that means you don't understand how an economy works.

Otherwise, you wouldn't have done that. Right. And so I can, I can, I can look at both sides and say, well, they're not both sides. Because if you're doing things where you don't understand economics, you're just as bad as the legion of the left who doesn't understand economics.

Right.

Well, when Barack Obama said, we always go back to this.

You didn't build that because, you know, it was the government that did it. He was, we were one of the few that blasted him. I mean, it was the night he said it hours after he said it. He's completely clueless. Well, because he said, you know, we built all the roads, the roads and the bridges.

Lose were built by the government and you didn't build that. And the problem is the big void in that statement was all of that. The roads and the bridges came from profits that taxes, well, you have the profits. And you actually really isn't a federal government construction company. No, you know, you might have had, you might have had an eminent domain and things like that

that would have been done.

Maybe some just date trucks in there, you know, but here's the thing is that you don't

do it without profits first. No, but the major construction is all done by private construction companies and all the money, there is no money and was America makes a profit. This is what these idiots don't understand. Money has no worth.

I'm not a big fan of my entire entire entire entire country.

Do you have any connections or access to the market?

No, only the way you're a big fan. Wow, and that's just a joke. The market is almost automatic. I'm so happy.

In Spain, the whole world is in a hurry.

The market is almost 30 years old. Let's have some fun with Viso Stoyer. Ah, yeah. Skrolling with Hayley. I'm Hayley Karania.

I scroll with the homies here in the live chat because there's a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok. Cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time. With Hayley to search that up and I will be there.

Follow a listen on your favorite platform. It's like the, as we said, which is what they want, they want you to, because they because then when money goes away, this is, you know, it's, it's bizarre. Well money goes away. Nobody needs it.

We'll just get everybody to do their fair share. But people don't even, people are clueless as to what gives money, money. It's worth. They're completely clueless. No idea.

Right. Well, why was the Soviet Union worth nothing because they didn't produce a damn thing? Which, by the way, the, the currency is judged on the international currency exchange.

Basically, the private market bidding and trading back and forth.

That's what gives your currency.

That's why when you look at currencies, they're different all over the world.

Right. Because it's a judgment. So free market judgment as to the health of your economy and the health of your economy is the goods and services that you produce, plus you can also throw in huge government debt that can drag on an economy because of tax policy.

Yeah. So it's all based on that. People don't understand everything crumbles if the companies don't make a profit. So when you're an idiot who comes out and says, your life will be so much better because all the companies will be nonprofit with everything fails, everything fails.

You are completely clueless. You have no idea.

You haven't even taken first great economics if you don't understand that.

It's, it's a very, it's a very, it's a very, it's just bizarre. And there's no way to have they tried this on any of the financial channels of having this breakdown or debate over where they try and presented it up. Oh, let's talk about the, the, the pros and cons of what the DSA wants. If you're on a financial channel, they might be doing it on CNBC, who knows.

But if you're on a financial channel and you're, you're even entertaining the idea of any pros to this whole thing. You're in the wrong business. I don't want to make a moral equivalency between the Democratic Socialists of America. Trump does understand an economy better than they do.

Yes. There are still things that, obviously, he doesn't otherwise. He went to done them and when you promote things that aren't about capitalism, you don't tell the truth. Well, it's so, let me, let me finish here.

Socialism never tells the truth because when Trump said, I'm putting on these massive

tariffs and foreign countries are going to pay for it, he lied to the American people. And, and, and that was, that shows that he knows how an economy works. Why he did it then to be, to when, when the sunshine hit, got blown out of the water on it, I have no idea why he did it. I don't know whether it's ego.

I don't know what it is.

I don't know why he lied and, and we, remember how many people would call our show.

You guys are wrong, the foreign companies pay, or foreign, foreign companies and foreign government's pay for it, know they don't. American companies do the reason that our debt skyrocketed, the deficit for last month, why did it skyrocket for all the money that had to be paid back because of the tariffs back to American companies.

And that's going to be an ongoing thing for a minute. That's going to be an ongoing thing because they're, they're not done. This is the problem you look at Scott Bessant, out there saying, no, the importer pays. Well, he's saying, other countries pay. Yeah.

Every day there's no way to explain that away. No, you can't. You know, and when you have Trump, for example, talking about having equity and businesses, now it's a small amount as to what the Democrat social system America want to do, but they're not doing that door, but you've opened the door for both sides to say, well, yeah,

If our government, I mean, that's, that's the, the path, JD Vance is going down.

Yeah. Right now. Yeah.

The path, JD Vance is going down is, well, if it's the right government that's controlling

more than the capital, then it's okay. No, it's going to change. And he knows that. It's bizarre. But on the tariff debate, it was over in December.

In the administration, put an exemption on 200 plus food products. And they stated, they stated it was to save families money money. Right. Exactly. Then why don't you take all the tariff saw?

Why don't you take all the tariff saw?

But socialism, which it is government control of the capital, and that's what it was

whether it's. And so, it's much more minor what Trump wants compared to what the Democrats want. But it's still the same thing when the door. And but when you promote socialism, you have to lie. You cannot tell the truth.

You have to live in a delusional world. And you've seen examples of it. You really see the examples from the Democrat Socialist of America. But the populist conservative will jump aboard the socialism train. And if it's the right tribal point to be at that moment in time, well, it's, you know,

and that's the thing, too, is that look at how much energy has been put on things that either shouldn't be in place by by this administration.

That either shouldn't be in place or will never be in place.

20% toll on the straight or moves. I mean, people were Googling, well, my toll tag

work in the straight or moves. I mean, it was, you knew it wasn't going to happen. You knew you weren't going to be able to do that. You mentioned that yesterday. Well, I, you know, I was like, wait a minute, that's going to raise the price of oil.

That's going to raise the price of goods. He's got a back off within 24 hours. You backed off on it, but his instinct is to do it, announce it and then have to back off. And it's like, so you know how it works, why are you, if you know how it works, why are you doing it?

That's because on international affairs, that is not the art of the deal.

That is not part of negotiation. One of the things that really was a red flag to me was when they put out one morning, we're probably, when he said, we're probably going to take control of cargile in today. I said, no, you're not because you wouldn't announce that ahead of time, because you wouldn't get that heads up to the enemy.

There's no way you would do that. It would be such a huge accomplishment if you did it, but you would announce it after it was done and secured, we now have full control of cargile in, and this is what we're going to do. But you put it out there for what?

Well, it doesn't even work as propaganda against the enemy, and the reason is because they also know exactly what I just said, you're not going to announce that ahead of time, you're either going to do it or not, and you'll talk about it after it's done. Like he did, after we bombed their new facilities. Those are the problems right now where there's too much energy going to things that aren't

going to happen and making and creating discussions that mean nothing at the end of the day when the meaningful stuff, the GOP is not promoting in any meaningful way. Did you notice yesterday or over the last five days, you have had, I don't know, of one Republican or the influencers on social media, and you know what I'm talking about, you know, when the president does something, it's the right thing, nothing on a ran.

Yeah, nothing. Right. Republicans have been dead quiet on it, because they don't know what the president's going to do now. Yeah.

And I was reading a national review, no, Rothman, Trump doesn't have the stomach for this. No. Then already now he's back to where we want to get them into a, you know, deal. Are we doing what's necessary, and he said the president should spare the country another

protracted humiliation in a ran and rip the bandade off now?

That's, he's talking about a deal again, and we saw, you know, it was so bad what happened with the memorandum of understanding, I mean, it was horrible that we were, we were giving

Them, we were allowing them access to cash for things that they didn't have b...

the war. Right. Well, if you do this, we'll open up this cash for you.

Well, that's why I called it the art of the castan's a deal, if you understand the sign

felt. Yeah, you're going backwards. You're going backwards on it. And now people who like you've got Republicans, and you've got, you've got the hawks. If you want to use that, the hawks don't know what to do, because they don't know if

it's going to sustain for a week, and then we're right back to where we were three weeks ago. Well, it's why you and I, I mean, I think I certainly speak for myself on this, I don't

know if I can speak for you on this, but but basically my approach has been, I don't take,

I take everything with a grain of salt, because on Iran, yeah, when I hear, we've deployed

2500 troops, they're now on the ground in Iran, you know, and I hear that, and I'll know

it, because it may not be the president doing it, it will be hexeth, it will be someone else at the Pentagon, the announcement will be made once it's happening. Talking about any, any deal with Iran is laughable, and the president knows it. They admitted it recently again, how many times has he admitted it, they can't be trusted. Well, he's the one that said they're playing me for a fool, and then, and then this

week, and he was asked, you know, and they're saying, you know, because the headlines were wrong.

Well, yeah, the ceasefires over, and there's not going to be a deal, you know, that's basically

what the headlines were reading. It's not what he said, he said, well, to me, the ceasefires over, the negotiators can keep talking if they want. Well, you just contradicted yourself right there, the ceasefire is over, they can keep talking.

They're not going to talk if the ceasefire is over, and if they were talking, there's not going to be a deal with a ran that you can trust, you cannot trust this regime. I don't know how else to put it. We're talking 47 years of experience with this regime that the entire world is very aware of, and the one thing you know about them is that they can't be trusted.

And they don't care about economic benefits. And there are of their people, other Arab nations, their neighbors know this, they want them done, everybody knows it, seemingly accept this administration. You can't trust them. We are right, I radio brought to you by FPPF, fuel power max, least donor operators should

be aware of four common revenue myths, myth one, concentrate on increasing revenue because costs will take care of themselves, myth two, more revenue per mile is the answer to all problems, revenue per mile really doesn't change much from company to company, myth

three, all you have to do to be successful is run a lot of miles, in reality revenue is only

half of the profit equation, myth four, you can tell how well you're doing by the size of your settlement check, the settlement check is only a part of the success picture, miles driven, loads hauled conditions, mechanical problems, time-off and especially costs all have to be considered, owner operator business 101 is provided by overdrive partners in business program, go to overdriveonlye.com to the partners in business section of the

website for more details on this and many other topics brought to you by Shell Rotella with advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep you are rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. We are when I went to you and he is our probably non-guring McNamara coming up on the bottom of the hour, well, the Senate had the fraud hearing yesterday and the Democrats

didn't show, the ranking member showed for the opening statement and then asked a couple of questions and he walked out and it was funny because they said all right, wait a minute, we're not following in order, we need to have the next Democrat speak on this, there's no Democrats here, no, I'm fraud and we're talking about the massive fraud, so Fox yesterday

Brett Bear do something on, you know, they believe like $500 billion is being taken out of our

Treasury each and every year by foreign adversaries, wow, and wow, it's like ...

care about fraud, why aren't they there, they don't care about fraud, no otherwise they'd be there, right?

On our website, RennieRidioShield.com, show info with stations, podcasts, and more,

Rennie, I radioed. And he is our probably non-guring McNamara, yeah, the Senate had the fraud hearing yesterday ran Paul and his committee and the question is because of Minnesota, it really the public now knows about it and we know that Democrats are doing everything they can to just not pay attention to the fraud, yeah, they're doing everything, they went after what that next surely,

they went after anybody who's attempting to expose fraud, they're going after to demonize

and at the fraud hearing yesterday, only the ranking member showed for the opening statements a couple of questions, then he was gone, there was not one single Democrat in the fraud hearing,

here's part of how they covered it on spread bear's special report yesterday, here we go,

just so people understand what the government, what the GAO, the general accounting office believes, the fraud is in the United States, here we go. Government estimates show hundreds of billions of dollars are lost to fraud every year, the White House and Congressional lawmakers are now investigating all kinds of illicit transactions from Medicaid scams to trade violations and emerging threats. Chief Washington course by my command, it tells us how lawmakers plan to address this issue,

big picture, good even Mike. Right, good evening, experts are warning house lawmakers about how foreign actors are using the latest technology to create fake identities to rip off the American

taxpayer. GAO estimates federal fraud losses at as high as $521 billion every year. Some of the

identity industry have begun calling this moment World War fraud and I understand why we are no longer, confronting isolated fraudsters. Burr has says the government is facing organized, increasingly sophisticated transnational fraud rings using AI at industrial scale. Outside technology experts say it's because our defenses are built program by program, while their infrastructure is built to move across all of them. In a Senate hearing earlier today, one expert called for

empowering government officials to do more oversight. Senator Gary Peters was the only Democrat to show up. He says skilled inspectors general would help. He's the only one. He showed up, gave the statement, walked off, you know, as a couple questions, then there were zero Democrats in the hearing and here's how that went. All right, here we go. Senator Scott. Chairman, wouldn't a Democrat go next since the Republican justice. If there were a Democrat here, yes.

So there's no Democrats present at a hearing about fraud. It doesn't appear to be a great deal of interest across the aisle. Unbelievable. You know, we talk about voter ID and you see where the public stands on it and the public is overwhelmingly in favor. There isn't an issue. I don't think there's an issue out there that ranks as high as voter ID. No, I don't think there's a, I don't think there's any issue out there that crosses party line crosses every single demographic

and the Democrats are completely against it, completely against it. Why would you be against it? fraud. That's it. Yeah, fraud. Yep. No, the Save America Act would be done. Yep. If not for the Democrats. You want fraud. You want fraud in the elections. And if you're not, if you're not showing up here, why wouldn't you show up here? Because they've been demonizing, Mr. Shirley, who helped expose what happened in Minnesota, as far as I know, he was part of the, the testimony yesterday,

you've been demonizing the people. And in California too, with the, the Medicaid fraud. Right. And other stuff going on, you know, you've been demonizing the people that have been exposing the fraud and the only message that the American public can get out of that is your pro fraud. Yes,

you know, that's what, and that's it. It's, why? Because you, you don't have enough concern

to show up to a hearing. Tell me what is, you're, you're talking about the GAO is talking about a half a trillion. They claim that they care about having money that legitimately goes to the people

Who deserve it.

Republicans got to hit them on the radical transgender movement. They don't care about transgenders.

No. They don't care about women. No. The radical transgender movement does not care about transgenders.

No. They openly admit there's a huge mental health problem there. And they say the solution for it is to allow young kids to cut off their body parts. Yes, they don't give a damn about transgenders. They don't obviously, they don't care about children. It's the most misogynist and sexist thing. I've ever seen a political party do against women. Yep. Women in sports, women in locker rooms. They don't care about them. And when it comes to fraud, you're talking about a half a trillion

dollars that could either go back to the taxpayers or could actually fund the things that you wish to fund and you don't care about it. And you don't care about it. You're okay with it. Tell me, tell me what, and that's people say, why didn't they show up? Because they know they can't to the only option they had was to not show up because if you're pro flawed, it's not going to look good if you're attacking the people that expose the fraud. Exactly.

If you're demonizing them, you can't win that in the American public. Right. That's where they stand. Because tell me another reason, I would love to know the reason why we're talking about with the GAO says is a half a trillion dollars in fraud. And now one democratic set, the ranking member to give the opening statement and ask a couple of questions and he leaves. There are zero Democrats at 99% of the hearing yesterday on fraud. Please, somebody tell me why you make sense of

it to me. You mentioned the voter ID thing. Because there's, there's very little moving parts here,

right on, on the right. It's very simple to understand. Should you have to demonstrate and show

your ID and prove who you are when you vote? The answer is yes. And people will say, yes,

very few people say no because they are okay with fraud. They understand how it works. That fraud is required to some extent to win certain elections. They know that. So, then you get into fraud in general. Government fraud, your tax pay your money being taken by bad guys, foreign bad guys, do you care about that? Yes or no, let's see that survey. Let's see that survey. Do are you concerned as an American taxpayer that your taxpayer dollars are being taken through fraud

by foreign bad guys? I don't know how that's not landslide territory. Hell, yes, I'm concerned. Should something be done about it? Follow up question. Yes. And the Democrats don't show up and they're still winning elections. Okay. New poll fines. More than nine and ten voters believe corruption is a big problem across politics and government. Is that technically, I'm trying to find, I'm trying to, I did a quick search for a fraud frauding government

a poll here. You know, fraud because fraud is, you know, you mentioned fraud and people were like, "Oh, no, I'm, no." Very few people are for fraud and the ones who are for it are fraudsters. They're the ones benefiting from it from that kind of behavior. But when you ask the American citizens, are you greatly concerned about foreign bad guys taking your taxpayer money through fraud? You're ready? I did find a poll on. All right. Let's see it.

Americans link government fraud to rising cost of living new poll fines, which means they're concerned about it. A growing majority of Americans believe that government fraud is contributing to their financial strain according to new polling as federal prosecutors continue to secure convictions in high profile cases. This is from ABC. The survey released by the State Financial

Officers Foundation found 83 percent of respondents say fraud or misuse of government funds

contributes to higher taxes or increased costs for families. Isn't that the exact same number? 83

percent for voter ID for fraud? I think it's somewhere in the right amount. We're like, "Okay, this

might be the same." But it makes sense. More than half, 52 percent say the federal government

Has not gone far enough to identify and stop fraud.

Republican than in his Democrat because Democrats don't care. They don't seem to care at all about

for Minnesota. It really shocked me how Democrats like, they knew and they were like, they didn't,

but they're constituents don't seem to care. No, it's not a thing where the people pounding on the doors going, "Hey, that's my money. It's bizarre. Absolutely bizarre that you would have anybody, not concerned about bad guys from other countries taking your taxpayer dollars through fraud." You would think that if anything would be bipartisan, it would be, but think about it.

If voter ID isn't bipartisan, if the vast majority and probably 90 percent of Democrats in Congress,

I could be wrong. It might be higher. Are against voter ID when 75 percent of their constituents are for voter ID, you got a problem? They get away with it because for whatever reason, it's not a priority on the voters' mind and doesn't keep the voter from voting for, you know, them. And you can't say the Republicans are making up, they're just making this up. No, because in Minnesota, two defendants recently pleaded guilty in the feeding our future case,

a scheme that prosecutors say exploited a federal funded pandemic-era child nutrition program

to steal roughly a quarter of a billion dollars in taxpayer money, another individual die to

the case was sentenced this week to more than three years in prison. Authorities are also pursuing, and this is the case I was talking about in California, where five people were arrested in connection with an alleged 267 million dollar hospice fraud scheme targeting the state's Medicare programs. Wow. Wow. Yeah. But as you see, the 80s, a landslide number of the public including Democrats, Billy Fraud is a huge problem that's costing them money. Yep. And Democrats

are like, we're not going to show. We don't care about fraud. Right. I guess we can sell our pro fraud narrative to the American public. Yeah. Because what else is it? Right. What point would

you make in that hearing? What point would you have to say to the person who was largely

responsible for uncovering the fraud? What would you, how would you argue with that person? Right. There's no way you can say he made it up. What's your reason for not showing? Right. Your reason is your pro fraud. Yes. Tell me what the other reason would be. No, there is no reason. That's it. We want this to continue. Right. It's worked in our favor. It's worked in our favor. Hey, we get the fraudsters support. Yeah. Right. I mean, that demographic man works guy rocketing.

Because that's what boggles my mind. They actually thought and said, we cannot show up for this. Right. We cannot show up. Right. They're not saying the fraud is in happening. They're just demonizing with personal insults and they're just these non-existent completely at the hearing. Right. Not there. Nothing. Why? fraud. Yep. Some of them might be out there promoting fraud. We are right. I radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently

and Gary McNamara. We are right. I radio. He's are currently not Gary McNamara. For those people who had said back

when, you know, we're hoping that Republicans could win. That's why they were hoping for

two Republican candidates for governor. Yeah. They were hoping that was happening. latest poll in Bashar up over Hilton, 61 to 36 25 last repulse 22 23 and 25. Yeah. California wants to be a declining state. Yep. They're choosing this. In fact, you took the

Bashar is viewed as the absolute by Democrats as the absolutely worst person ...

Democrat administration. Yep. Completely and totally incompetent is how he was viewed by Democrats.

Just to show you this, this, the people Democrats want the insanity. They want the worst of what the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialist of America wing. We warn the voter

wants it. The Democratic voter wants it. At the start of the Biden administration, we warned

they're not done yet. They're going to get more and more extreme and it's playing out right now all over this country, including California. And if Hilton wins, I'll say I was wrong. Yeah.

This, see his red eye radio on Westwood 1. Ham Chris Fanfleet go behind the scenes and beyond the

headlines with the biggest names in pro wrestling and beyond Mr. Sandman. Oh, I ever wanted to be as a pro wrestler. So I got to live my life and make people really happy. No heartbreak, kid,

himself, Sean Michaels. Do you think there's anybody better than you were? I think I was great at

what I did. And I think other people were great at what they did as well. Great Mrs. Moore of mindset. I think that anything else mindset, motivation, insight with Chris Fanfleet. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. The United States soccer Federation presents the US soccer podcast.

The place we're at, Megan Klinger, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything that you need to

know for this summer's World Cup. How special is it that we've been able to follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of the motion. Did you feel the intensity? White a bit of time, energy effort, everything along the way on these guys, making the country proud.

And I think they were the summer. The US soccer podcast presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on

your favorite platform.

Compare and Explore