07-17-26 Part One - Wildfires and Election Fraud

Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from

“politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting”

your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome, and good morning. Hello. We'll try to be as clear as a beautiful Dallas sky, and not a smokey. We will be completely and totally transparent here today. We won't be smokey like it is up north. When I came in, I figured out it was about

14 miles from the airport, and the air is so crystal clear that I could see like eight planes

lined up coming in on both runways at DFW. When you see it from that far away, it looks like a bunch of dive bombers coming down. But I couldn't believe how clear the landing lights were from that far away, and that's after the entire day talking to friends and relatives in both New York and Cleveland. Leathy, my old producer at our great affiliate KXL in Portland. He's in Cleveland, and he said they had a cancel activities today. They were canceling activities

in my brother told me in the Buffalo area. Like you just don't want to go out, you breathe it in. And I know that on pollution days here, especially if I'm working out heavily, I feel like I have a slight allergy when that happens here. Right. But you look at, I mean,

“the smoke was so thick up there. There's over, there's 77, I think yesterday, and I don't know”

exactly when this news item came out. There were 77 new wildfires yesterday in Canada, a total of over, it's like over 850 wildfires going on right now. Wow. Wow. So that picture that I took of or that not that I took that my sister took of Toronto might look completely different today. Now, the good thing is I fly in later on this morning to see my dad for a couple days. Yeah. Okay. And that's great. But the time that I get in,

it should be moved past. So winds are going to pick up to like 15, 20, 15 to 25 miles an hour. A cold front's moving in, supposed to rain on Saturday. So from what I know it should be, it should be okay. Well, good. Good. That's good. But yeah, we had, what do we have? We had this a herod dust thing going on for a few minutes. Yeah. And a couple weeks. Yeah. And I was actually out over the weekend, late one night, a couple of weeks

ago. And I'm on the freeway, not far from here. And the wind was unreal. It was really late. And the wind was unreal. And the dust, I couldn't believe. And I thought, is this another say herodust room? It was construction dust. No. It was all construction dirt. You know, being basically carried from those piles across the, the freeway. They were building pyramids. That's pretty much, basically it might have been say herod. Yeah. Yeah. So we were having dirt drips and

set a snow drips. So yeah, it was really bad. Man, the wind was, you know, there was a, there was a near post story about about Buffalo yesterday. Yeah. And about home prices and things like that. And it was funny because people are so reactionary. I mean, it's like back and forth.

I've never moved there. It sucks. Well, you know, no, it's great. I mean, I've lived all over the

country. And I'm originally from Buffalo, New York. I was born in Buffalo, New York at Millard, Phil Moore Hospital. Yeah. And every single city that I've lived in has had great things about it, and things not so great. Right. You know, it's just, we get into stupid arguments. It's like

“I never forget the whole money magazine. Do they even do it anymore when they would rate the best”

places to live? And we found the pattern early on that the best places to live is where the federal government or state governments, you know, have their, you know, they have their capitals were a ton of taxpayer money is flowing in. And whenever there's a place, whether it's medical that has a ton of taxpayer dollars coming in, especially small and medium towns or the small and medium towns that

of taxpayer dollars. But I remember at that time, I was living and working at our great affiliate

WROK in Rockford, Illinois. And Rockford was like, I don't know what I don't, I don't think it was

“last, it was like second last in the country. I remember my dad had something going on in Chicago,”

and he came and visited, and I drove him all around and I said, by the way, Dad, this is, and it could have been that year they were there. It was like 93 maybe, I don't know. So I don't know what ranking it was. Like, Dad, this is one of the worst places to live in the United States. And he went, God bless America. Yeah, exactly. You know,

I mean, because every, but, but every city, you look at every, every city is dealing with poverty,

every city, you know, I don't know any city that doesn't have problems. And you can sit there and go, yeah, but the best majority of cities are liberal. That's one of the problems. That's actually one of the biggest problems. So, you know, I mean, I saw something about Mom Donny who goes far beyond liberalism, but I'm Donny, he was considering, he's considering banning landlords from getting proof of income and doing credit checks.

Think about that. Yeah. So you can't, you can't essentially qualify in any way. And why would you do that? Because you want them, you want the landlords, you put them in an impossible situation where they can make money. And the entire goal is very safe. Yeah, right, for the state, because you want to cap what they can charge. Yeah, you want to cap, you know, rent. And then at the same time, because the next thing would be, okay, if you're going to cap, you know, if you're going to cap this

and your whole philosophy is that nobody should go into debt, because or or nobody should be forced, you know, to pay their rent if they can't pay it. Well, then the next thing that you're going to have these landlords do is they are going to absolutely check the credit scores and credit history of the people that are going to rent from them. Because already, they have one problem with you wanting to cap what they can,

what they can rent the places for. And then number number two, you're coming out and and and throwing this out. You know, because once you do that, they're going to say, okay, we got to find out, you know, what's their credit score? What's their credit score? Well, now you can't do that.

“You need to go into this thing completely blind where the state controls”

your profitability or your potential of profitability. But then, and that will be doomed to fail. Well, and, and, and, and that's it, that you, because you think about it, then you try the hands

of the landlords, then here's the thing, where would you rent? You would have to then, if you were

a renter, you'd have to find a place to live outside the city. That's the way it works, because he could only control that within the city, right? Then you would have to just move outside the city because landlords would just have to sell their properties. I don't know who they'd sell them to. You know, commercial entities, or I thought about this. I thought, well, okay, you know, how it used to be, I don't know if they still do this, but back in the day, back in

order, back in the 1900s, they would often ask for first and last month's rent, right? And I thought, well, okay, six month lease, you pay six months upfront. And who would be able to do that? Wow, yeah, that's a great point. I mean, you know, there's, there's no way, there's no other way around if he were able to get this done. There would be no way around that for landlords, except for to ask an entire lease term to be paid up front. Nobody can do that. Well, I mean, it's because

“he's a, remember, he's a young guy and, and we're old folks here. Yeah, right? And so we remember”

public housing. Yeah. So yeah, that's where they should go public housing. Well, Gary, what you don't understand is they have the wrong people controlling public housing. Well, if you

just like communism. The reason that socialism and communism hasn't worked is because you have the

“wrong people in charge, which, by the way, is admitting a dictatorship almost or authoritarian”

control because in the economic system of capitalism, it's so diversified, you're going to,

you know, you can never make that claim. Capitalism is so diversified because what? You have so many,

you have millions of people involved in the process and involved in an economic process that's voluntary between people. But as we now know, playing the, the whack job from the DSA yesterday, my, my God, what a, I mean, seriously, you're dealing with your, you're arguing with children where, you know, she was talking about no, no debt that you shouldn't have to work a job that all, all companies will be non-for-profit in the United States. But it's not about a bureaucracy,

go, what the hell you talking about? And we kept, we kept stopping and playing bits and pieces of

“it back and going, she's contradicting herself again. Right. Of course, if you go from where we are”

right now in the United States to everything being non-for-profit, which means it's being run

by the federal government, you are going to increase the size of bureaucracy like has never been

seen before in the United States ever? Well, think about what the president and the government basically released tonight as he gave his speech, think about how bad it would be, think about how bad and how powerful deep state would be, what they could get away with. And that kind of world that the DSA is lining up. And that kind of nation that the DSA is, that they believe is going to happen. It's not going to happen in our lifetime. But this is what they're pushing for.

You know, when I was thinking, and we'll get into the specifics of what Trump said last night,

“and what Republicans should do with it, but I'm confident they, they won't, right?”

Because I think what you look at this entire week with the president yesterday would, would he talked about. By the way, whether it was Catherine Harrage on CBS, we'll have the audio coming up. She said, no, this has been known. This has been vetted. This has actually happened. This actually did happen. They kept it. But think about this, because I was thinking about this on the way to work. I was watching the Plainsland at the FW.

The whole Hillary Clinton thing. There has never been a bigger political scandal and she's never been asked a question from any media about it. Right. She is the one that set up Trump. You've never had a scandal like that to try to change the outcome of a presidential election. Right. I was thinking yesterday, when I was listening to the president, I'm like, well, yeah, but the potential of China is there. We know the potential of Hillary.

Yeah, where we, not only do we know the potential of Hillary, we know what actually she did. And she's never been questioned ever from what I know in that she will not. She only goes to friendly media and that's never who will never ask the question. If that happened the reverse,

conservative media would ask it. You know, because for a split second, I thought, why is she always

only on MS for the time being or whatever they're called? And I thought, you know, because that's small time for her if you think about it, right? Yeah. And she looks small time. It's because she can get away with it there. She knows, you know, this is somebody who's very, very sophisticated in controlling basically her environment, who's going to be, who's going to have access to her, including in the 2016 election cycle when young reporters who weren't, you know, they were kids during the whole

Monica Lewinsky thing started asking questions about her husband. And she was running for president and they were like, no, no, no questions and they built a, they built a wall around her and you couldn't get to her, you know, they had to vet every reporter that was going to get a sit down. So when you look at, you know, when Hillary did to set up the Trump campaign through the, the money and the DN, the DNC money and her election money, which they were fined by the federal elections

commission, uh, for basically hiding where that money was going, which was opposition research that they made up on Trump, which was the dossier, which was a bunch of lies. They just said,

Clinton and the DNC organized that entire thing. And as I told you, when I met that, that couple

“at the hotel that I stayed in Buffalo back, uh, what about, was a five months ago maybe the”

more months ago, they had no idea, they said, why are you making stuff up? They had no idea that that doesn't exist. Right. They had no, I said, well, the dossier was all made up. Yeah. No, it wasn't. Right. It was. Well, here it is. And I said, I can show you, and this is where we get into it, I can show you all of the evidence. And every time I said, I can show you all the evidence, the response was, we don't believe anything in the media.

And then my response was, then how did you form your opinion? Right. Or did you learn what you learned? I mean, it's just, you go in this, you can't get anywhere with them because they'll just deny reality or I have come to realize by doing this and being in the arena of debate now for, you know, a few years, it'll be four, four decades. I mean, I've actually been in it more than, you know, because I was a station manager. So I was actually involved more

in new stuff and everything else in news departments. You know, so it's at least 40 years doing that it is true. Ignorance is bliss. People walk around very blissful in their opinions that are completely wrong and don't want to let any new information in that would change their bliss based on ignorance. It really is true. Yeah. Right. They have, and they have no clue. None.

We're, you and I, I mean, I've always been this way. I'm curious about everything. Oh, yeah.

And if something, and if I get new information that I can verify is true, that can change my opinion on something, but I don't jump on something and either do you within complete information. I can't get to the point of a conclusion if I don't know everything or at least enough. And we live in a society where everybody is speculating and jumping into conclusions before the facts are in. Yep. We are right. I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi. I'm Jen Lumis,

“a transport safety expert at JJ Keller. In order to manage speed, you need to understand the”

four factors involved in stopping a vehicle. Perception distance is the distance of vehicle travels from the time you see a hazard until you're brain recognizes it. The perception time for an alert

driver is approximately three-fourths of a second. Reaction distance is the distance of

vehicle travels from the time your brain tells your foot to move from the accelerator until your foot hits the brake pedal. The average driver has a reaction time of three-fourths of a second. Break leg distance also needs to be taken into account. When operating a vehicle with air brakes, it takes about half a second for the mechanical operation to take place. Finally, breaking distance is the distance it takes a vehicle to stop once the brakes are applied.

Breaking distance is affected by the weight, length, and speed of the vehicle, as well as road condition. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Lines open for your goals. 866-90-red eye on Red Eye Radio. I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome in good morning. We'll play some audio coming up from the president and others following the bottom of the hour, but basically the president laid out

“the vulnerabilities in our election system. That's what we did. You and I were talking about it.”

The problem is the whole goal in all of this if you're going to do it. You've already got the

people that have voted for you on your side. And probably more. Yeah. But you've got, if you're trying to reach independence, Trump is not the one to sell election fraud. Right. He's just not the one to other people in his administration might be better at doing it. My point is to independence. It's blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Right. Even though what he said is 100% right and we'll get to that coming up. Trying to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction. Thank you for

helping. But I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else.

To that guy that's so many clones wish that I still was and do not embarrass the entire country.

“Now, I can go back. I can get there fast, lose tonight, and you got a real problem. Do not blow it.”

The gym room show podcast. You've been warned. If I would listen on your favorite platform. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Backers Studio. Henry, I read I read you. I'm Gary McNrow, along with Eric Carly. This week when I look at it, one word that comes to my mind across the board, fraud will get to that in just a minute. You know, when it comes to supplements, two things matter the most that it works and you can trust it.

But rather than just tell you about relief factor. Let's share a story from another great

customer mark. He was in tears from his daily hand joint discomfort. But after a week on Relief factor, he said he felt about 50% better. And now he barely notices any pain. We love the customer

“service. That's what Mark says. He's so happy. He's spreading the word to everyone. I am too”

Mark is one of just many, including me. That's getting those benefits from taking Relief factor. They sent me some to try and I'm telling you. Before Relief factor, there were days when I was almost in tears. And now I can do the things I want to do because of Relief factor. My pain is no longer an issue. So let's get you started on that three week quick start.

Just 1776. Here's what you do. Go to ReliefFactor.com or call 8004 Relief. ReliefFactor.com

or 8004 Relief. And maybe soon we'll be sharing your success story. All right. Here's a part of the president speaking last night about the vulnerabilities of our election system. The documents cover five major areas of concern. First, they show that over a period of years starting during the 2020 election cycle. The people's Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history resulting

in China's illicit acquisition of 220 million U.S. voter files. That information includes names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences, another sensitive data that would be needed to register to vote and engage in other nefarious activities, which is exactly what was happening. This data loss presents an unprecedented election security nightmare. The intelligence even shows that China signed a data exploitation unit specifically to this new

project. And as we all know, the allegation is from the president that the intelligence agencies kept this information from him. This is Catherine Herage on the News Nation, formerly of CBS News

“now an independent journalist talking about it last night on News Nation. Well, I think it's a very”

significant announcement, not only what he said, but the fact that they are releasing these documents, so that we can really fact check the claims we heard this evening. I've been digging into the documents already, and I found this November 2020 email, and it's specifically states. It's a conversation among intelligence officials. It's specifically states that they have, quote, deliberately massaged one of our pending PDBs. That's the president's daily brief to avoid any direct links to the election.

And that is consistent with my reporting. I understand the whistleblower complaint alleged. And I think we're now seeing it in the emails that there was an intentional effort to suppress intelligence about China's influence operations. And this was, Cadillac, a massive effort. What they call a multi-domain operation. That means trade. It means diplomacy. It means open source information. It means social media. So all the levers of power China had to influence the US election.

And John Solomon, by the way, also said that this has been vetted already by the intelligence agencies. They know this happen. They know this was kept from Trump, and they know that China was doing this, which again brings up another vulnerability in our election system. You and I were talking

It's how they do it. It's not, yes, not what the point you're trying to get across. It's how you're

“presenting it. If, if I was, if I was Susie Wiles, what I would have suggested to Trump is that”

it's not a prime time speech with him doing it alone. Sorry. But independence, a significant portion of independence of completely turned off this president. Right. When he speaks, and we've talked about when he talks about the war now. Because it's been all over the place. It's now blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. That's just the reality that it's a reality when you aren't consistent into what you have said. And on the war that's been the criticism, as I've said, when you

think right now with the United States going back against Iran, you go and look at the influencers that have completely and totally supported the president on everything. They're completely quiet. Republicans are totally and completely quiet because they don't know where the president is going to

go next. The other point is he's well into his second term. He is a president that speaks

more than any other president. At times, you will get overexposed, and the public will turn you off.

“Yep. I believe this is something where the president should have had, again, a morning meeting”

on this. And he's got a group of people behind him. He's got maybe the head of DNI. You bring on Marco Rubio. The most credible person right now in this administration is Marco Rubio. Yep. The most popular person, I saw Steven A Smith yesterday. I forgot where he was on. It was as to, would you vote for an ending included Marco Rubio? Yeah. By the way, I don't know if Marco Rubio, when it comes to politics,

would be the greatest president. As a secretary of state, he's a great secretary of state. And as a senator, I had some concerns. Right. When I agree with where he wants to go, I don't know because I don't know what his platform would be. So this isn't where we're going to go. We don't do that anyway. We care about your ideas, not who you are as an individual. But I would have Marco Rubio there, probably have John Ratcliffe speak, Marco Rubio speak,

and whoever else you could bring out there, but Rubio definitely in there because he's the most popular. Sorry, but when it comes to election fraud, the public has turned off Trump. Well, and, and, and, you know, this is a look, the 2020 cycle, everybody's put behind them. Now, this isn't something that the American people should just put behind them in terms of this evidence that they brought. So then, how do you get it out in

front of something that people are trying to go? Well, there's a way to present it, coupled with the Save America Act, coupled with the urgency of having secure elections. This is something where you, again, if each of those that you mentioned, I still would do this later this morning, just hours from now. Yes, I would have those people at the podium, talking and saying, this is what these are the findings. The media's had all night to to work

to it. Nobody's disputing these findings. This is why it's so critical right now to have

voter ID implemented in this country. What I'd be doing is constantly members of Congress, the leaders of the Republican Party and in Congress and the administration, because you look at this week, this week again, voter ID is out there again, voter ID. You've got all the fraud in Minnesota in California and their Medicare Medicaid, excuse me, hospice system out there. You had the hearings where only one Democrat showed for a couple of minutes. And that was a ranking member,

you know, gave the opening statement as a couple of questions and was gone. Now, one other Democrat wanted to be involved in fraud. What you do is you take everything here, you take the vulnerabilities of our election system, which by the way, Trump may not be the greatest messenger to sell that

“to independence, but the fact is independence already agree with him, because of voter ID,”

right, that's it. Because if you use that as the launching, when you look at exactly, when you look at

voter ID, the public, you say, we're, you look, we're not, we're not saying there's 10 million votes.

We're looking at the vulnerabilities in a very high, in all the high tech systems that all these governments had that they can use against us. We're looking at what, you know, what, what happened, voting in, voting in consistencies, mail in ballots coming in late. You know, all of this is the

and this message needs to be every, and every day it needs to be in commercials. You didn't make

those 30 second, 60 second ads. We use, say, fraud. We're the Republican party. We don't want,

“we don't want fraud in our elections. That's why even the majority of Democrats agree that”

there needs to be voter ID, then when it comes to fraud, look at the fraud in Minnesota, the, the GAO saying a half a trillion dollars may be being ripped off again by foreign entities, you know, using basically fals ID, you know, we saw the fraud in Minnesota. We've seen the fraud in California. We know it's there. Why don't the Democrats care about fraud in our election and fraud for taxpayer dollars? And it should be a continuing message over and over and over again,

sold by, by everyone. Well, and it's, because in the past, we'll make the case that in today's

world, we're six years on from these events here that we're laying out in terms of evidence, we're six years on with the, the advancement of AI going full steam every, every single day. So now implement what AI could be doing if these, if these governments, including China and other frenemies that are out there any other nation who wants to interfere in any election cycle, what they could do if they implemented AI to do this, you know, because if you look at

everything that's laid out here, it's unbelievable. But it doesn't come off that way, it comes

off as Trump saying once again, and this is, look, we know what the liberal activist media is

going to do. We knew that they weren't going to cover it, you know, CBS came in late and then they left early. We know how that works. But if you lay out the evidence and you put it out there for the American people to see, not just on White House.gov, but in the presentation in making the points, the strong bullet points about what happened here. Keeping this from a sitting president and is daily briefing, I want, I want names. I want people who are responsible for all of that, and I want

them to be held accountable. And we're, we're, we're telling you what these vulnerabilities are, and we're telling you, and we know your concern, this is what you tell. We know that the American public agrees with us, because whether there's fraud or not, any person with common sense, which is the vast majority of Americans say, we need to have voter ID to prevent fraud. It doesn't matter whether it, nobody sent it out. Well, the fraud's only 10% or 15%, no reasonable people

in this day and age say voter ID is a good thing, including the majority of Democrats, Democrats, why don't your leaders want it when you do, because of fraud? And we're concerned about what has happened in elections, vulnerabilities with the chain of custody issues, as we've talked about, you know, before the uneven application, as we know, of election laws after COVID and everything else, people had doubts and justifiably so. And we don't want people to have, you

“know, doubts about our election system. The Democrats say that we're trying to rig an election?”

No, how could we be trying to rig an election if we want voter ID? If we want transparency in the election system, you know, they're the ones, look at right now, look, you know, whether it's fraud and elections or fraud with your taxpayer dollars, the Democrats don't give a damn. And you, the entire umbrella, that's one issue, but it contains both fraud of taxpayer dollars and fraud, you know, you know, the vulnerabilities of fraud that we have seen. And so the whole

point is you make the, the place and people, it's pretty common sense. We all know there's fraud in taxpayer dollars now. Nobody's debating it. The GAO Democrats don't want to talk about it. And we ask why GAO says $500 a half a trillion dollars. Maybe going to foreign governments, we know foreign governments are trying to influence or get involved in our election system. We don't want to wait till they do it. We've already seen what happens. They're doing it for our

“money. You don't think they'll do it for the election. The American people do. That's why they want”

voter ID because they know that's one step to ensure that there's not fraud. But yeah, they'd want

Pretty simple. I mean, these are things you can do if you present it. Right. Yeah. We are Red

“Radio. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently and Gary McNamara.”

We are when I radio and he's early and I'm Gary McNamara. And by the way, when you talk about fraud, you hit, as I said, there's three things that you can do because there's three things I'm proud this week. I said, this is this is fraud week. Because we've had the voter ID. We've had Trump talking about, you know, governments, you know, what they want to do. And you've got the

hearings on fraud in Minnesota, in California. And the GAO talking about $500 billion. I have

a trillion dollars they believe is being illegally taken through, you know, fals ID. Right. That's being set up by foreign government and foreign entities out there. And you go to the

“American public, here's Rand Paul said this yesterday. Visa and MasterCard can catch a fraudulent”

$1,200 charge in minutes. Yeah. The government it takes 10 years. Yes. That makes sense to people. Exactly. Exactly. Top of the our news is brought to you by how products, visit how products.com.

This is Ridae Radio on Westwood One.

Now, it's Ridae Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Ridae Radio.

“All across America, we are Ridae Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara.”

Welcome to the Friday show. It is spreading. It is. My calendar's been off all week and it's weird. It's flying by. Yeah. Best thing is for us here, we're getting some, well, not south of us, and south westerns flooding there is terrible. We're just, we're getting, you know, up here in Dallas or a worth. We're getting just the right amount of rain that you want for middle of the summer. Sure. Yeah. Because every time it rains, we're in like three days in a row.

Yeah. My place and all I keep thinking is, okay, that's another seven days, seven to 10 days because I have that thick southern bermuda. I mean, it is, let's put it this way. If you have, I have an electric lawnmower. My garage is attached to my house. I just don't like having gasoline

in the garage. So I have an electric lawnmower. Not powerful enough if the cuts too deep.

You know how fatty the southern bermuda is? Oh, by the way, see this goes back to something else this week, the Wall Street Journal article about the white collar men and their obsession of talking about their lawns. Yeah. But no, but we got, we got a ton of rain because I look at I go, okay, another seven to 10 days. I don't have to do anything. Don't have to spend money on water. So I saw one on watering a lot of people are changing how they water their lawns because of the

the cost of the water. But also how much you get out of drip irrigation. I thought, well, for a garden drip irrigation, but you can't really do a lawn built-in drip irrigation that I know it. They may have one and I'm not aware of it. No, for southern bermuda, you're not supposed to, you're supposed to water and then not water. Yeah. Let it get a little dry. So the roots grow. Right. Yeah. Yeah. That's that's part of this article too. And the drip irrigation, though,

the water actually gets to the intended source, right, to the roots. And I thought, yeah, I, here's my take. What I've been doing over the last couple of years, that's work. July and August, I stretch out my intervals on cutting. I don't cut every seven days. I let it go. I'll let it get just a bit bushy. In fact, and I just saw an article tonight that said, that's the the harshest thing you can do in 95 or hotter degree weather is cut your

really high though. Yeah. Mine's like three and a half forage. Yeah. Yeah. Mine is to really tall.

“And I still go now we have different about every eight to ten days. We have different different kind of”

grass though. Yeah. I have a rally Saint Augustine. Yeah. It's an I have the southern bermuda that

goes dormant in the winter time, which has replaced snow for me. I never thought that I could

the crunch of the grass instead of the crunch of the snow. No, just the color. Yeah. The dormant color has replaced snow because I always thought, I mean, after I was down here for a, you know, a while because I've been here 26 years and then I was in Portland before that. And you actually got more snow in Portland than you got, then you get here. And but it was, you know, you didn't have southern bermuda. It was, you know, green all the time. Right. And even during Christmas,

you could get, you know, snow occasionally. But here, when I moved down here, I said, I'll never

get used to not having snow. And I did. And I love going back up there, you know, for a day,

just to have a little bit of snow, just a little bit of snow. But yeah, the, the lawn changing color for green to whatever that color is that it changes to sandy kind of color almost. Right. Yeah, whatever that, that to me is wintertime in the holiday season. Yeah. There you go. Yeah. And by the way, don't forget, it's Christmas in July on the hallmark channel. Okay. No idea where that came from. Yeah. All right. Now, I want to, I want to talk about, we want,

I think we're having this discussion. I think that everything right now, because of where the Democrats stand, everything, no matter what they do is a great opportunity. There is no negative that, you know, for example, whether it's CNN or whatever, which one of the networks decided not to carry the, the, the, the, the, the, the president or CBS cutting them off, none of that is a negative. All that should be used as a positive for the Republican party. And you look at this

“entire week. And that's how, and, and I don't think politics is that hard. I always think it comes”

back to the, the issues and where the public especially in, on, on, on issues where it's landslide numbers that anyone on the other side who is trying to pretend those landslide numbers don't exist. It's an opportunity for you. And so when you have what you had this week, which was the hearings on the Senate on fraud were except for one Democrat, none of them showed up. And we all know the fraud exists in Minnesota and in California and in other places, and they had the

representative there, they, the, with the, giving the GAO numbers half a billion dollars a year,

they believe goes to foreign governments. Yeah. You tie all of this together. Why don't the Democrats care about your taxpayer dollars? We looked at polling yesterday to see if there was any polling that related to voter ID, which is like 83%, 82, 83%. And it came out that 83% of Americans believe that fraud in government makes their life more expensive. Well, you got them. Yeah, you got them. Okay. You've got 83% on voter ID. Oh, you've got 83% that recognize, they are harmed

by government fraud. Yep. You don't get those numbers on any issue. You take and run with it. You bring it out and say 83% of the population believes this on voter ID. 83% believe that government fraud, you know, and, and, and, you know, is a problem. We all recognize that foreign governments are getting involved in this fraud. That comes from the GAO and the Democrats don't care. They don't want to show up. The networks don't want to carry when the president is talking about

the vulnerabilities in our election system. They're part of the problem. They don't agree with the common sense of American. Then that's 83% on voter ID and 83% who believe they're being damaged. Yeah, that it's making their life harder because the government fraud that exists. And so much of that government fraud is coming from foreign entities that are hacking into our systems

“and using false ID. Why doesn't ABC care? Why doesn't NBC care? Why doesn't CNN care?”

We care. And this is the broader thing. You know, we've used it with the radical transgender

damn defensive. Right. No, they don't give a damn about transgender. No. They're the ones and we've

got the audio. We play the audio. The left all these professors and all these, you know, medical heads of these doctors that are had a medical school. Whoa, you know, most, that was a great this week. Yeah. Most pregnancies are to females. Yeah. Shut up. I know my god. But you know, we, and we've talked about they don't care. They know, they've stated it. You ask about the trick. You can't ask about that. That's transphobic. Well, I don't even know what that means.

“I'm out of freight of any of this stuff. I'm just asking questions. What do you try to sell me?”

Right. Well, you can't bring this up at all because if you do, transgenders have the highest rate of suicide and somebody will commit suicide if you even talk about it. Well, there's a huge mental health problem here. And your solution is telling young kids they should be able to cut off their body parts or take your reversible hormone treatments. And their parents should know about it. Right. You don't give a damn about them. You don't give a damn about women.

The misogyny of the misogyny that you see of the radical transgender movement, the sexism of young women, the enabling of sexual harassment. Oh, yeah. It's just used to male genitalia in the locker room. You know, you look at it and you also put it under the umbrella. They really don't care about you. They claim they do. They don't. They don't care. You believe that government fraud is making your lives harder and more expensive. They don't show up for the hearings. They don't

care about you. They don't care about women. They don't care about the actual solutions to poverty. Look at their cities. There's a narrative that you can throw out. And here you've got Congress.

Okay. Maybe a 93 billion dollar or is it 75 billion dollar reconciliation, which really doesn't

get us anything that we want. But we just have to somehow come through the midterm. Republicans have to stop damn being on the defensive all the time. You know, there's so many issues here. There are so many great opportunities that you have. You know, it's not a negative that the networks wouldn't carry the president. You can take that and you can throw it right back in their face. And you can put out that message

“that 83% of the public actually agree with you with. Well, and here's the thing, too, is I'm”

looking at the numbers of everybody who was carrying the president's speech live. Because it wasn't just like if you go to YouTube, there were multiple channels that were carrying it live and you could see each of them had like anywhere from 50 to 100,000. I didn't count all the channels. But I'm adding it up and I'm thinking, look, there's audience saturation. No, it doesn't necessarily mean, by the way, that those viewers

are in the U.S. or that they're U.S. citizens. Many of them could be from China. However, there's ways to get the message out. In fact, to your point, Gary, it's highly predictable that the networks weren't going to carry it. Oh, yeah. The networks are irrelevant. Nobody cares about the evening news. What are they paying? 10 bucks an hour for the anchor now? We make more.

Slightly. And by the way, that's a lie. All right, we don't make as much. But the whole thing is they don't. That's a saw where Brian Williams has a podcast on Netflix. I don't know why how in the world that happened. But you look at the predictability of how the media is going to either carry it or respond. And you already have that plan as a part of your strategy. Yeah. So many opportunities here by the stand. And like I said, this week, to me,

was fraud. And I just can't believe the way that the Democrats respond. Yeah. You know, again,

“they don't see what the public sees. No. And that's what you do. You reinforce the opinions that”

the public already has and says, this is what you think. Yeah. Democrats won't even show up. Right. For fraud. Right. jail believes a half a trillion dollars. We see what happens. We've seen

what happens in Minnesota. We see what happens with the hospice, you know, Medicaid. This incredible

fraud. That means the money doesn't go to you. Right. You already know that because you believe

and to the point of what the president was releasing tonight. Very simple. Look, because they basically spelled out. We don't know how much this changed the results of 2020.

That's not the problem. No. 2020's behind us. That's not how you market it. The problem is

what they learned by what they did. Now also add in their advancement on AI, how China has advanced at super speeds when it comes to AI. And their ability now six years later to influence elections or even possibly control elections. This is why you take you you do most of the voting in person with you exceptions. You do voter ID and you make sure you're protecting your vote and your

“tax dollars from fraud. Pretty simple. By the way, I think it's a great idea. You take the”

paranoia that we have about AI right now. Oh, I guarantee you use it to your vote. No, because

they're they're talking about this. You know, I think I don't know if it was the CEO of Nvidia. But they were talking about how advanced China has been. They're really on their it's super charged right now. My biggest concern with AI is how different governments, including our own will use it. Yeah, the argument that we what the Republican should be promoting is taking away or the president. The licenses. No. Yeah. It's a great opportunity to show. Oh, yeah. That

them networks don't care about the fraud. Let them let them build your point for you. Right. They don't

“care about fraud elections. Right. They don't care about fraud in your government that you believe”

as a citizen is costing you money across all political demographics. Right. We brought to that poll last night to show that. Yep. They don't care. And so it's the general umbrella of fraud, which contains voter ID, foreign influence in both taxpayer monetary fraud and what they're attempting to do in our elections. And you would compass that all together and say the Democrats don't care about it. We don't we have no other conclusion to come to accept their pro fraud. Right.

And the perfect example is voter ID where the public understands the vulnerability of not having ID to go and vote that the potential for fraud is greater. And there's smart enough to understand

“we're not going to wait for the fraud to happen. These are common sense safeguards that you see”

in every other aspect of society. And I thought the thing where because that what Rand Paul said, oh, you know, I had, I, you know, you, we get it all the time. This may be possible fraud, did you take this? You get the text within a few minutes. Yep. I did the other day. Yep. We are right, I radio. This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by house products, tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. Another month of tightening beef production forecast

led the door rise and projected steer prices. The summary from USDA's July beat outlook. This is World Agriculture All Outlook Board Chair Mark Jackadowski. We raised our steer price forecast for 2026 by 94 cents for 100 weight. Now it is at $251.10 per hundred weight. And we expect that strength to continue into 2027 given the type supplies that price forecast was raised by 50 cents per hundred weight to $254.25. As for the beef production forecast this month or this month,

for this calendar year, what we're observing is lower steer and half for slaughter. The 2027

production mainly reflects lower placements in the second half to 2026, which will result in

fewer available steers and half for slaughter in 2027. I brought bay and reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C. This report brought to you by Senax fuels and loops. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, toll free at 866. May be Red Eye.

the Republicans here across the board. I was looking at some of the nomination here in

“yesterday. I believe it was the blanch hearing where you had the Republican senators go after the”

witnesses for the Democrats who were hardening murderers and rapists and everything else. And it was, well, some of that audio coming up. And it reminded me, I mean, to me, it was a terrible week for Democrats on fraud on that. Tim Walsh, for example, on the rapist, that he pardoned, and saying that we shouldn't judge child molesters, based purely on their decision to rape a child, but how they live the rest of their lives. Are you kidding me? I mean, my God,

when you hear stuff like this, you're like, they are truly insane.

And people wanted him to be vice president. Yep. Unreal. Yeah, shit, I read your life. Every night on the Rennay Radio app available in the app store. Ramp it. All right, radio. And he is our problem. I'm hearing McNamara download our Rennay Radio app today and you can listen when and where you choose. Okay, this was Renn Paul. On on fraud yesterday was on Newsmax,

a great Kelly show. And talking about the fact that how come a young man just with a camera was able to start this whole thing on fraud? Where's the government? Here we go. It's pretty amazing what you can do with a camera and a little bit of hutspuff. Welcome, Senator Rand Paul. Why weren't bureaucratic investigators able to uncover what this

“young man did with a camera? You know, I think because we don't have any investigators,”

this question was asked over and over again. The Democrats were complaining, oh, it's sensational in the videos. And to my mind, it's like, where the government inspectors

been for decades, I think part of the problem is this, the federal government pays for these programs,

but the state signed people up. So there's no incentive for the states to police these programs, because to the states it's free. So right now, new people we add to Medicaid, a lot of these programs are Medicaid, 90% of the bills paid at the federal government, 10% is paid for by the states. So the states look at it as, oh, well, this is free, who cares? I don't care whether it's an able-bodied person. I don't care whether they have a job. I don't really care whatever their income is.

That's the way the state's treat these, particularly blue states. So Minnesota hasn't cared for a long time. But there's a legitimate question. Why is the federal government not sent inspectors into the states to look at this? It took me, surely, a period of days. We asked him, how did you find the ones that I looked up the spending and I found the autism centers that had hundreds and hundreds of clients, and they were the biggest one in Minnesota. Some people had just

go see if the people with autism were showing up and he got there and nobody was there. He went to adult learning centers or leering centers that can't even spell the word and nobody was there. But this young man had to wear with all to do it and you're right. The entire federal government didn't do their job. He also talks about the fact that in that interview, I saw yesterday he said, it should be 50/50. There should be no 90/10 states have to have,

what do they call it when you're in the game, teeth in the game? Yeah, you got to teeth in the game here and they don't. And when somebody else's money, nobody cares where it goes.

“Well, that's it. I mean, I think we pointed that out in different scenarios where the states don't”

care about federal money. They want more federal money. They don't want to use their money. They want more federal money. You know, wind power in Texas, that's one of the great examples in recent years until freezola. You know, and it was like, oh, well, maybe we shouldn't be. Maybe we should go back to, you know, focusing on reliable energy. And those are the things that have to be watched along the way. But if you put the, if the states have to put up as much as the federal government

game. Then you're going to have better results. But, you know, this is the world we live in.

When some young guy goes out there and then all of a sudden just, you know, starts recording. And is demonized by the left and Democrats for exposing dairy. This is sensational. Yeah, no. And the thing is, is you couldn't debate. You couldn't say, well, what he, what he put

“up there was wrong was false. It was AI or something like that. It was real. And that's why they”

had to demonize. This is why they have to do what they do. They cannot win elections. So they have to have fraud included. So this is voter ID. They cannot, you know, if you think about spending

other people's money, you can't care about other people's money at all. And they don't. Otherwise,

you would care about the fraud when it comes to money. Well, this is where they don't actually care about people that really need, really need the money and the help, where the money government and this is another thing of the narrative that they should be promoting that we've done for the longest time. Liberals actually don't care about you. Right. Because you, they should be outraged. They should have been outraged a long time ago because it was, this was all this

“fraud was happening in plain sight. And they didn't care that that money could have actually gone”

to people that really needed it. Well, that that was not on their on their radar at all. No. And one of the examples years ago, Charlie Gibson was the debate moderator and asked Barack Obama about the capital gains tax. Yeah. And he told me pointed out, well, it shows that if you lower the capital gains tax to a certain point, it actually increases government revenue, which would mean what? Now, Charlie didn't get into that part of it. But we did. We broke

down said, well, that would mean for the programs that a liberal Barack Obama would want to fund, you'd have more money for those programs. And then he says, he had to ask the question twice,

Charlie Gibson did. And then finally, Barack Obama came back and said, well, we'll do it out,

we'll raise the tax out of a sense of fairness. In other words, the revenue that was created, we're okay with that revenue dropping for the programs that we want to fund, that we claim we want to fund. That we say we want to fund, that we say we care about, we promote that we care about them. But he demonstrated clearly in that moment that they don't. And this has been going on for years. That's just one example. And it was years ago. It was 2008. This, here we are with

Democrats not showing up to fraud hearings. You have, you know, the liberal activist media doesn't care about voter fraud. They don't care to carry the president's speech. They don't care to get into it. And by the way, they have the ability at the time the president was talking as

“Katherine Harage did, as a lot of the media did. Some of the media did. I think John Solomon did.”

And they were going through what was was being released as the president was talking at White House. Go. They had the ability to go through it and look at it. Instead, what did they do? They just dismissed it. And you know they're going to do this, by the way. Which is what we talked about in terms of strategy and how you presented. And then they come back with, yeah, well, this is something Trump has lied about before. This is evidence. This is evidence of what the Chinese were doing

and the fact that they were keeping it here in the States. Deep state was keeping it from a sitting president. That's not a small thing. And if you can't focus on that, then you're not a journalist. You're an activist as we already know. And I said great opportunity for Republicans this week on fraud. I hope they, I hope they take it. I don't have a lot of confidence that they they will and also going into the midterms. I just, I don't know how much I can emphasize the fact

that by how Democrats present everything, including identity politics, including the radical transgender movement, the racism of, I would hit them on the racism of identity politics, the misogyny, and sexism of the radical transgender movement and the fact that they do not care

dollars in fraud. They won't even show up for the hearings on it in order to attempt to solve the

“problem. They don't wish to solve the problem on other things too. I mean, when it comes to,”

you know, Tim Walsh, you take the Tim Walsh thing about the rapist. You know, you take sanctuary cities. They don't care about, they don't care about you. If you're black, they don't care about you. If you're transgender, you put them on the defensive. And for some damn reason, Republicans, when they have the win, still around the defensive. But J.A. Paul was a J.A. Paul during the one hearing, we've been here four times before. Yeah. We've been hearing from these,

you know, parents who've lost children, mother hands of illegal immigrants of illegal immigrants, come on. We've done this. Why do we have to keep doing this? That's their approach.

“They don't care. It's obvious. We've been doing this for a long time. I've never seen a political”

party so obvious in their promotion of not giving a damn about American citizens. I mean,

I've never seen it out loud. I know. The Tim Walsh thing is so unbelievable. We're not going

to judge somebody based on their worst day. Well, Tim, this may have been yours for saying something so stupid. We're not just when you think he couldn't get more stupider. He says something like that. Well, partying a child rapist. Yeah. Well, you're judging him by the action and the action itself. Right. You know, a couple of that. For the words day. That's Tim Walsh for you. Yep. The permission structure for the Democratic Party to be absolutely insane. Well, it is

“the permission structure for rapist devote for you. Yeah. And the permission structure for”

lunatics for anybody who wants to still vote for the Democrats because of their hatred for one guy Donald Trump. I mean, there's still winning elections. The Democrats are still winning elections. And this is another thing. You go back to what the president was saying last night, just hours ago. You know, he made the point to say, well, they can't win elections. They have to use fraud to win elections. Why else do you want fraud? Why else do you not want voter ID? What? The public. They're

not even making the argument that it's too hard to get an ID anymore. They're not. They're just saying no, no voter ID. They're still using the Jim Crow. Well, they're trying to. But the thing is that

doesn't fly because they know that you've got well over 80 percent of Americans who want voter ID.

And even landslide number of Democrats. You have that one and the same with fraud. We know the polls have been covering this for a long time. America hates fraud. Yes. 83 percent of Americans according to the latest polling believe that government fraud, fraud of taxpayer dollars is making their life harder and costing them money. You've got these issues. One. Yes. And this is it. Very simple. You step up to the podium. Two things are happening. Your taxpayer dollars are going

to bad guys in other countries. The taxpayer dollars that should be helping Americans are going to bad guys in other countries. Your vote. Right now, the integrity of your vote is in question because of foreign entities and their very sophisticated actions that it started years ago and who knows what they're up to today. And by the way. So your vote doesn't count and your taxpayer dollars are going to foreign bad guys. You said it earlier in our reflection also made

note of it. You said Trump never said in the speech. He lost the 2020 election. Right. He never said

that talking about the vulnerabilities of the election system that the public sees and this is where you take it. This is when you have this is where it frustrates us so much about the Republican party and how they market things because you've got to sell ideas to the people. Yes. And you've got to relate to what the people think already in landslide numbers and say that's where we are. We're with you. You're with us. The Democrats are nuts. Right. They don't care about fraud.

They don't care about women, the misogyny and the sexism of the radical transgender movement. They don't care about the transgender's on the other side. They're claiming there's a huge

mental health crisis of suicide and the solution is to allow confused children to cut off body parts.

Right. How you win that argument every time. And with the independent is where you win it. You're not going to win it with the Democrat because the Democrats, again, ignorance is bliss. Yep. It's a wash you're going after and the random. You're going after independent.

“So that's what you're doing. We are right. I radio. Coming up more with Gary McNamara and”

Eric Carley, it's Red Eye Radio. We are when I radio and he's our currently non-Gerry McNamara.

It's got to play this off the topic. We got it. We got to clear the desk because it's the Friday show here. Just show you where the Democratic Party is. This is Massachusetts Governor More Healy, Libs of Tip Talk, had this one and they cut the two audio cuts together and she's complaining that they can't get natural gas and then the other clip of her boasting about

blocking gas pipelines. Okay. All right. Here we go. Ready. Here we go. This is where they are.

Gas is so volatile. And we don't even produce it here. And with Jones Act and other things, it's hard for us to even get it here. Okay. Remember, I stopped to gas pipelines from coming

“into this state. I think it's like that's so great. And so she's complaining about a problem.”

She caused. Yes. Exactly. The kid if you get gas here. Hey, you know, I stopped those pipelines. Wow. This is Red Eye Radio. On Westwood One. Hand Chris Fanfleet go behind the scenes and beyond the headlines with the biggest names in pro wrestling and beyond Mr. Sandman. Oh, I ever wanted to be was a pro wrestler. So I got to live my life and they people were really happy. No heartbreak, kid himself, Sean Michaels. Do you think there's anybody better than you were? I think I was

great at what I did. And I think other people were great at what they did as well. Great Mrs. More of mindset. I think that anything else mindset, motivation, insight with Chris Fanfleet, follow and listen on your favorite platform. The United States soccer Federation presents the US soccer podcast. The place we're on Megan Klingberg, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything

“that you need to know for this summer's World Cup. How special is it that we've been able to”

follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of emotion. You can feel the intensity white a bit of time energy ever everything along the way on these guys making a country proud. And I think they were the summer. The US soccer podcast presented by Henkel, follow and listen on your favorite platform.