Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything...
politics to social issues, and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show, from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio.
He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara.
Thanks so much for being here this morning as always.
Thank you. Just reading, looking at, apparently, Sophie Cunningham from the WNBA, from the Indiana fever, Kate and Mark's teammate, has sold out all of her basketball shoes. So, it's interesting because I saw, it was the gay publication website out that said, you know, she has her new popularity, you know, and I'm paraphrasing here, she's transphobic.
“And the funny thing is, I'd like to ask that question again, what does that word mean?”
Yeah, because already saying she fears, yeah.
What is trans people? What does transphobic mean? What does it actually mean? And if it's a real phobia, then it would be just beyond, it would go beyond fear. It would then be, you're accusing her of having some kind of mental illness that leads her that affects her a fearsome, great that it creates a mental illness type situation.
If it's a true phobia, it affects the way she behaves or some or some is like, you know, because because I guess you could say, is racism a mental illness, or is it just being evil? Right, because that's the point. They're trying to paint her as evil. She's, she's, she's, she's out there just to find that that women should be left alone in a locker room, she's just showing her transphobia, which
“means what? What does it definite? What is the definition on the left?”
These are the questions people on the right have to ask, what does that mean? Yeah, to find it. Define, transphobic. Well, the definition of transphobic is, I should look it up in the, didn't even think about looking it up to see what the term is in, in the dictionary. That's, yeah, it's got to be there, right? Right, transphobic meaning. All right, let's see what they have.
Transphobic means showing discrimination, aversion, or hatred against transgender people. Well, you're misusing the phobic part. Yeah. I have, is as describes negative attitudes, feelings, or actions towards individuals who gender identity do not match the sex that they were assigned at, at, at, at birth, transphobic to me. Uh, again, is that is the, the first sentence showing hatred against transgender
people. So, if we cutting him has never done that, we've never done that. I've no hatred
towards anyone. No, what you're trying to say is it's hatred to accept biology. You're saying it's immoral to accept. Well, it's hatred to ask a question. Right. Exactly. Because that's, yeah, what's his name from Missouri was it with that one. Right. Your question is transphobic. Yep. How? I'm trying to figure out how you can justify ignoring the reality of biology
“and chromosomes. Right. That's what I'm asking. And you're saying by asking the question,”
and then the answer is, well, yes, people that are transgender, if they hear what you have to say, might commit suicide because they has the, one of the highest rates of committing suicide. When then there seems to be a bigger problem here. If people are committing suicide because they disagree with biology, there's a mental health issue here is they're not and you ignoring that and not bringing that to the attention, attention and debating what care is
Needed to these people.
You say they have a mental illness, but you're not there to help them with it. You're there to
“enable their delusions about biology by telling young people you should be able to cut off”
your body parts. That's not love. No. Ignoring a mental health crisis that you or the one is promoting it. Yeah. Exactly. If you're promoting a mental health crisis and then ignoring it and then telling others they shouldn't talk about it. Right. Then you're part of the problem. Exactly. You have no love towards transgender people. No. None. None whatsoever. You're enabling an untruth. Yep. And you're saying you're doing it because if you say the truth,
they'll commit suicide so you admit a huge mental health problem here and you say the solution is only to enable that lie and allow children to cut off their body parts. Yes. Well, that's
“insane. You're evil. That's pure evil. And that's what that's exactly how they what they want”
is people to not talk about it. What they want is to call people bigots and then put them on the defensive all day saying, "I'm not a bigot. I'm not a bigot. I'm not a bigot." I'm not a bigot and to get them off topic because they can't discuss the reality of it all.
And the reality is very clear. If there's first of all a mental health crisis,
we need to stop everything at a dressing. And second of all, nothing absolutely nothing should be allowed that is irreversible for children. No. Nothing. An adult? Yeah. Different. If they make a choice as an adult, that's their choice.
“We're not going to change science that if you want to make a decision as an adult to have elective”
surgery or whatever treatment it's going to be. Go for it. That's yours. I can't take that away from nor do I want to. But for children, you've crossed the line including surgeons. Yeah. Anyone who's involved in doing this irreversible damage to children. Anything that's irreversible at this level should go to prison, including the surgeons. They should be in jail,
period. That's not phobia. That's reality. My fear, my real fear, would be that our society more and more accepts the idea of children being able to do irreversible damage to themselves. If you want a phobia, if you want a fear, there's a fear. But they care nothing about. Children, they care nothing about the trans community. If their indeed is a mental health crisis, then there should be a massive discussion about this.
And they don't want it. They can't have it. Even as they are the ones who are by what they're stating and meaning that they believe on the left, there's a huge mental health crisis with the transgender community. So, well, scrolling with Hayley. I'm Hayley Carania. I scroll with the homies here in the live chat because there's a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok or cutting through
the clutter. One hot take at a time. Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before and to say hello. I love the chat interaction that thank you for helping. But I do it to get all the videos and all the content that you won't find anywhere else. Scrolling with Hayley, desserts that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
Jim Rome takes on sports. I will always have a complicated relationship with this game.
People evolve.
devolve. Back to that guy that's so many clones wish that I still was. And do not embarrass the entire country. Now, I can go back. I can get there fast. Lose tonight and you got a real problem. Do not blow it. The Jim Rome show podcast. You've been warned. If I would listen on your favorite platform. All right. Fauci, this will be interesting this week. When Rand Paul
“questions him. I think again, well, the Democrats not show up again. That's a good plan. January 26, 2020.”
Fauci writes in his diary. "Now we know the market was not the source. It was the amplifier." End of quote. January 26, 2020. We really weren't even talking COVID at that point. It was out there in the news. Yeah. It was not what it was when we hit March and then April of that year. Right. Started to really building when we got to the middle of February. And then kept building from that particular point. January 26, 2020, Fauci writes in his diary. "Now we know the market
was not the source. It was the amplifier." Right. A lot of the stuff they're going to be hitting
is from his own diary in his own words. They're going to be using against him. You and I've always
“said that Fauci approved gain of function research and knew it was going on. And he was not supposed”
to be going on. Right. And that would have been one of the reasons he changed the definition of it. I hope that Rand Paul and whatever Republicans are there because Democrats have no interest or curiosity about any of the lies that were told during COVID. They don't care. This is something that if you're Democrat Socialist America, you look and you say, "My God, look at that. Look how we can manipulate." We can manipulate a population.
So easily where we can keep them in their home for over a year. Well, it's the power that brings and the fame and notoriety. And by the way, he wrote about that in his diary, Fauci did. He wrote that his national and international fame is explosive and really unimaginable. And that it was not hyperbly to say he was the most famous and talked about person in the country.
It was clear to me at that time. It was clear to me when Trump was not president after his first
term when the leftist media started basically adoring Fauci. That adoration, you look at that control that he had, the influence that he had all along the way and then the adoration from the media. And he adored it, he loved it. And the last thing that he wanted was to find out that tax payer money was used to enhance the virus in the lab. And he was a part of it. Here's some Fauci's own personal
diary. It now appears using Epidata and genomic data that the first infection was an early
December and was not connected to the market. The infection spread among people weeks before the Chinese reported that they were dealing with the new infection and that gave the virus time to establish itself in multi-generational sustained spread. Remember early on the Chinese, remember early on the Chinese were saying that there is no human-to-human transmission and that all 27 cases came from the market. Now we know the market was not the source.
It was the amplifier. Having said that somewhere the virus jumped from animals to humans. And then we can just go on with the John Stuart at that point. Yeah. The John Stuart monologue on co-bearer a few years back. Right. But they knew it wasn't the market, knew it that new in January.
“Why? Why did those oppose to Donald Trump in his administration?”
Why did Fauci, why did the CDC, why did the National Institutes of Health? Why did they go
After?
destroy the reputation and careers? For example, of those doctors at wrote the Great Barrington Declaration back in October of 2020. Why did they go after them? Why was there not a search for truth? Why did Democrats still today have no curiosity or interest in finding out the truth about where COVID came from? So we don't make the same mistakes again. What were those inside the American government so concerned about the truth of what happened? And did not care about debating
all the different possibilities out there. And if you wanted to, you needed to be censored and
“punished. Why? And why is there no curiosity on the Democrat side at all?”
About the origins of COVID and really there never has been. It's just been to hide it and deflect.
Why? They don't care. They absolutely don't care. And they saw it during, as it was happening real time, they could see it. Gavin News, some didn't buy the science. We had many demonstrations of that along the way at the time. He didn't buy the science. All they needed is the boots on the ground to be screaming. The Karen's on the ground to be screaming. Sex feet apart. Where you're mask?
February 1st 2020. The call that produced
“where the origin, you had 12 scientists. Only two concluded it was natural. That's”
per Fauci's own notes on February 1st of 2020. The rest felt that deliberate insertion was possible and that's a quote from Fauci from his own diaries. You know, of course you know, of course he knew. We are Red Eye Radio. Brought to you by FPPF Fuel Power Max. After fuel and owner
operator's second biggest variable cost is tires. To save, get as much life out of them as possible
with good habits, maintain proper inflation. It's free and easy, yet it's the highest saving maintenance you can perform on the truck. In proper inflation is by far the greatest reason tires fail early. Perform routine maintenance. If a technician can by hand initiate a regular
“movement in Tyrod and Kingpins wheel bearings and torque rods, that spells trouble.”
Fight irregular wear by replacing suspension components. On the steer axle change your shocks at least as often as you change your tires. On the drive axle replace shocks halfway through
the tire's life. And when the tires are changed to, finally employ good driving habits.
You have full control here. We're conservative driving over rough surfaces helps reduce wear, speeding, hard braking, curbing and tight turns caused tires to wear fast. On the other hand, steady acceleration, braking and steering can extend the life, saving a bundle. Owner operator business 101 is provided by overdrive partners in business program. Go to overdriveonline.com to the partners in business section on the website for more details on this
and many other topics. Brought to you by Shell Rotella with advanced synthetic technology is designed to help keep your rig running with more mileage and less maintenance. Wonderful for your goals. 86, 90-red eye on Red Eye Radio. We're Red Eye Radio. He is Sir-Crony and I'm Gary McNamara. He's going to be fascinating hearing. Again, Fauci has, you know, he cannot be prosecuted for
anything except if he lies before Congress. Because he got the pardon already, the pre-partum from Joe Biden. And so nothing's going to happen there. But again, when it comes to line before Congress, does anybody accept a Republican ever do any time? Yeah, good question.
You know, I suspect nothing will be done.
where if not enough people care, he gets away with it. Yeah. And look at how many people,
“by the way, it's not just him doing that whole thing. That should have been held responsible.”
And it's not going to happen. Catch Red Eye Radio live every night on the Red Eye Radio app of the whole in the app store, Red Eye Radio. And he is Sir-Crony and I'm Gary McNamara. Welcome in good morning, download our Red Eye Radio app and you can listen when you want. That's simple. And thanks,
right. I was telling a few people about that over the weekend. I go, no, listen to the
app, listen to the app. Yeah, get the app. It's real simple. It's free. You're up so late at night. You're on. So yeah, we solved that problem years ago. Yeah. Yeah, something, you know, we have an app. We love the
“people that are up listening to us. That's right. And in the hospitals and in law enforcement,”
drug drivers, I mean, it's just insomniacs, insomniacs, people that hate us so much that they had just low this was such great passion that they have to stay up. And listen every night. Right. To the entire show. So they get angry. That's right. So we, we, we, we, we, we thank everybody. But well, here we are. The strikes have paused. Trump was talking about going in other two weeks and finishing this thing off. He announced a pause in order to revive diplomacy. Well,
to open up the straight of hormones and the continuing debate as to our munitions stock and how much we have or not. And that was going both ways, depending on who you talked to. Well, Trump's saying
“we have plenty. We have more than the right, you know, more than we need and we have more than anybody”
of the world and and the whole thing. But the question is, do we actually? There was a question early on. It wasn't. It was probably a month into it. Maybe month and a half into it. About our ability and what we had in terms of the anti-drone technology. Right. Because what was being used by Iran was a very simple in terms of its make, simple type of drone. And, but it required a special, of course, type of defense and we had not planned for that.
So we were running through our anti-drone defense ability fairly quickly. They started working on that. And then now we're talking about anti-missile technology or maybe all the above. We actually don't know because they really haven't said. Nobody has said they're not going to admit. Hey, we're low on stocks. But if they've paused it in hopes of having more conversations, then something tells you that something is wrong. The problem with the anti-drone technology
is that we didn't budget for that. So we only had so much on hand. And the budget, of course, comes from the house. You're going to have to get approval on Capitol Hill if we need further budget. But you mentioned earlier we've said it before. The number one responsibility of the
federal government is to protect is national defense to protect its own people. And this should never.
Yeah, there's there. We should never have a concern about the munitions. There's never a close. That is not even a close second here. No. But the the the story is Wall Street Journal and other supporting up with the Wall Street Journal. The White House has been informed of the declining inventories of air defense interceptors by General Dan Kane, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The issue is a concern for Kane who believes that low inventories would not preclude a
presumption of major combat operations against Iran. But would add to the risk, a spokesperson for Kane said he would not discuss the chairman's confidential advice to the president. Several officials said at Admiral Brad Cooper who leads central command believes the U.S. can cope
With the limited stocks of Patriot and other air defense interceptors because...
U.S. strikes if they are approved by Trump would blunt Iran's ability to large, uh, large numbers
“of missiles as spokesperson for the central command declined to comment on Cooper's planning. Trump”
denied, as you said, that the dwindling munitions are a problem in assisting to a statement to the Wall Street Journal, that we have far more munitions than anyone in the world and far more than we need. The interesting thing is, as you just mentioned, though, that this is supposed to hopefully help
kickstart negotiations. This is the first time that the administration has said, all right,
we're, you know, either we're considering or we stop the attacks because a deal is on the line. Right. This is the first time where it's okay. Talks around going and we want to give negotiations a chance now. That's a tough one that did not get a lot of support at all. I, you know, I mentioned to you, the thing I saw about over the weekend, that the influencers for Trump that were majorly active on social media, especially acts. And it was the,
you're gonna, I mean, it's, look, it's a logical thing, but it's whatever he does is correct.
It's the cheerleaders for Trump, right, nowhere to be seen on this, nowhere to be seen on him,
“adding the new tariffs again. Remember, they were tariff crazy when he started. Right. The”
influencers were all over the tariff to nothing, absolutely nothing. It's if it's died and I actually went and looked to make sure I did, you know, didn't miss any on about three or four influencers that I know out there. They're not mentioning it at all. In fact, the last mentions, one of them had, was, again, the military successes were having, but Trump stopping it and the official word is when we're doing it to, you know, we're keeping all options on the table, but we want, we want
negotiations, you know, to continue and have a chance is a drop from what we got before, which is
every time there was a possibility we're willing to do this. If they're willing to have a deal, now there's no deal. It's just, all right, we're stopping in order to keep the possibility of negotiations going. That isn't selling well. Well, and here's the problem. All right, so, you know, also at the end of last week, and it's come up a few times, how much is China involved, how much
“is Russia involved? And then it was said, I think by the president said something to the effect”
that, well, Russia and China both have told us they're not selling any weapons or anything to Iran. And I thought, well, what if they're not selling them? What if they're giving them to them? And exchange for something down the road. And by the way, I don't believe anything Putin says, I don't believe anything Jesus. I don't believe China and Russia to begin with. So, I don't care what they're telling you. We have to have Intel accurate Intel as to the movement of anything coming
out of Russia into Iran, which is why, in fact, the Israelis had a secret operation and Azerbaijan. Because if you're going to move stuff by land, you're going to then buy truck. You're going to do that through Azerbaijan, from Russia, through past the Shadeg mountains in the north, all the way to the Iranian border. And that's where they were, they were set up throughout. Now, the leaders of Azerbaijan said, that wasn't the case that wasn't going on. But it's widely
reported that that's exactly what was going on. By the way, should have I expected, it should be. And our Intel should be gathering what's going on between China and Russia and Iran. We should have that information. And a couple of experts that were associated with a think tank and this Wall Street Journal article are saying that our inventory right now of anti-patriot missiles is below a thousand, that we've used so far over 1500, which based on inventory would put us
at below a thousand, that we're at severe risk. And one of them said, if we were in a situation with a country like China, this would be a very big risk. This would be a huge risk. So you look at, you know, my concern is that Iran becomes a proxy for China. Not to necessarily defeat America, but to run out the stock source, to keep everything,
You know, where it's going and keep Trump guessing.
So they want to do it only to create more chaos. So both have motive to help Iran. And when you look at this situation, if it's true that our munitions stock on the defense side
“is at low levels, and that's why we're stopping. If that is accurate, and I'm not saying it is,”
but if it is, there's a huge problem. There's a huge problem. I want to play this as Senator John Kennedy, one of the president's
most laurels supporters. Here's what he had to say on face to nation.
It got a lot of attention this week. You were pretty sharp in your questioning there of the defense Secretary Pete Higgsith, when he asked for $67 billion in funding for the Iran war. You said, "Just like our poll shows, you need more information. Did you get an agreement that you will be provided the classified detailed briefing that you say is necessary?" I'm having breakfast next Wednesday with General Kane. I've seen the poll. It looks about right.
“I support the president in Iran. We all need to do a better job messaging.”
I may end up with a sunburner on my head by saying this, but we all know the president. He exists loudly. He grows anxious when he has an unexpressed thought.
He's not always disciplined in his messaging. I'm not saying he should stop talking. He's the
president. I'm not. But I would put Rubio and Kane and Radcliffe and Headset out there. Either in a speech or in a long press conference to explain what's going on in Iran, why we went in, why we're still there. Now the Democrats, I listen to Bernie, Bernie wants to just come home. He wants to turn out the lights, make sure the cats are inside and go to bed. That would be a huge, huge mistake. And right there, when you've got, again,
one of the most loyal supporters of Trump on this scene, you got to explain this. We're losing message. We looked at the polling last week that came out. He said he's seen the polling on it. The president doing this now. Look at what's the point of stopping now.
“Well, and you know what, what is, what is the goal? Is there a goal? And what is that specific goal?”
Is it still to get them? And you know, this, and I saw this over the weekend, it was something we brought up. You've attacked more infrastructure things and military sites, but you're not taking out the government. Is it possible? Has it, is it the wrong way? Should the focus have been all the time like it was in the beginning? Take out the levels of government and regime change and not do it. What, what I question the most is that we stopped it with the president
making the threat. Here we come. We're going to go and then it wasn't okay. We're stopping because they're at the table and we're close to a deal. It's to give negotiating a chance. That's a huge fallback politically from what Trump has been doing during this war. Well, it didn't even include
the word framework. You know what, because we always use that word as they can because they use
that word, which tells us, okay, nothing's been done yet. They're just talking and it means nothing until something gets done. It wasn't even that. And, and this is the problem. Because if we've taken out as headsets once said, we've taken out most of their missile capability in Iran, then they've regained some of that somehow. I suspect China and Russia. If it's not China and Russia, then our intel was deeply flawed. When, when they said that that not the, okay, we've got a deal on what we
got a deal. And so we're going to go into the chance. That wasn't said. It was, we just want to go change to continue. There's many parties out there. I saw the ambassador saying that yesterday on the Sunday morning news shows, you are giving ammunition to those on the right to not on the left on the right to say, this is how we get in forever wars. Yeah. Right. You said we're not going to do forever wars. And it doesn't seem like you know how to get out of this. Well, it's starting to
look like a Russia-deacrange situation. Fairly or not? Yeah. I'm just talking about the politics and that politics will come from the right. Well, and that's the, you know, that's the problem here. That if this isn't politics driving this, if this is truly a munitions shortage,
Then we've got a problem.
problem than it's already been. We are right. I radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio
with every currently and Gary McNamara. We are right. I radio. He is here. I'm Gary McNamara.
“You know, we mentioned last week that I think two weeks ago was the lowest number in what was”
since 1969. Was it like, was it layoffs? And they're like, what about AI? And even though it's
just one week. And then another story here, Wall Street Journal, big company starting to hire again
to find predictions of a AI wipeout. You know, we said this back, remember when Obama was saying that we were losing all of our jobs because of ATMs. And we're like, the banks came back,
“you wouldn't know. We're hiring more people because we could put them in other areas.”
They don't need to be here. In fact, there was a Wall Street Journal article that talked about the
pullback by companies on how much they're growing at AI right now. And it's been pretty dramatic in recent months. But when you've seen every major massive technological invention in the history of the world has created more jobs, right? This is Ridae Radio on Westwood One. The United States soccer Federation presents the U.S. soccer podcast.
Good place we're at. Megan Klingberg, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything that you need to know for this summer's World Cup. How special is it that we've been able to follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of the motion. You can feel the intensity white a bit of time, energy effort, everything along the way on these guys, making a country proud.
“And I think they will be on it. The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel.”
And listen on your favorite platform, scrolling with Hayland. I'm Hayland, I'm Hayland Carania. I scroll with the homies here in the live chat because there was a lot to scroll through on X on Instagram on TikTok, cutting through the clutter. One hot take at a time. Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello. I love the chat interaction. Thank you for helping. But I do it to get all the videos
and all the content that you won't find anywhere else, scrolling with Hayland. Dissearch that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
