07-29-26 Part One - Hogg, Fauci and the DSA

By Aldi there is a price for all!

“This week, the big Bauer Fruchtjogort 250 grams.”

For only 39 cents. Or a small mineral water. 1,5 liters. For only 75 cents, it's really nice. And the more expensive it is in your Aldi Nord.

Aldi! Good for all! Now, here's Rennie Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day.

Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Rennie Radio. All across America, we are Rennie Radio. He is Rennie.

I'm Gary McNamara. Well, this is the way to start the show here.

And I didn't tell you that I wanted to bring this up first because I wanted to get

your reaction too. All right. All right. Democratic political strategists, the serpent, James Carvel, on Sunday said David Hogg, former Democratic National Committee Vice Chair, should succeed, current chair Ken Martin, calling

the DNC dysfunctional. Well, you know, when I saw that, and I have seen it, I saw it, in fact yesterday during the show, it was late in the show and I saw that headline. I think I saw it at the Hill. Yeah, it's a Hill.

Yeah.

“So, I thought to myself, well, I remember.”

He's been screaming that the party's going batsu crazy, and he wants David Hogg to be the leader of the party. But that wouldn't that be the next logical move.

There was a Wall Street Journal story talking about, you know, how this new, the DSA basically,

they're, they're a small group of radicals within the Democratic Party, not thought. No. No. No. No.

They're not. One of them is the mayor of New York City. I'm sorry. The president of New York City. And the, you know, this idea that the party, the party, the party, the party, the party, the

party. They saw her. He's a dictator. But he's, look, you'd be closer to saying that than you would be if you said Trump is a dictator.

I mean, you know, government owned grocery stores, and again, Trump is welcoming government on this and that, you know, to a certain extent. So, who knows? No. I don't believe Trump is a dictator.

Yeah. But here's the thing.

Well, during his third term.

Yeah.

“During his, I think maybe the fourth term, but before he, I'll give you some leeway, it could”

be the third. But no, I saw that, you know, the, the party basically has a decision to make. And I thought, well, I think Glenn closed in, and what was that movie with Michael Douglas or she boils the rabbit? What was that called?

Fagle attraction. Thank you, Ron. I will not be ignored. That's the DSA sitting over in the corner. They broke into your house while you were gone, I'm sitting there waiting on you, making

you boiled rabbits, too, saying they're not going to be ignored. They're absolutely bad soup crazy. And one of the things that David Hogg was talking about before he got the boot was that the party had not focused on his demographic, his age group. The people between 18 and 30 and they had ignored them, they had ignored them, they had ignored

them. Well, what's interesting is they got rid of him, but they started focusing on what? On younger candidates, you know, it's, it's, maybe he, maybe David Hogg was before his time at the DNC because it is a, you know, this is a radical situation for, you know, the Wall Street Journal article that, no, they're in charge of the party, the loudest

most radical faction of the Democratic party, the DSA right now, is definitely in charge, which has me wondering what the 20, 28 convention convention was like. As we said yesterday or was it day before, they are in charge, how do I know they're in charge because the leaders and that would be Jeffries and, and Schumer over and over again keep saying it's all part of a big tent, right?

They're including them. So communism is part of the big tent, they're not, they're not setting them aside. They're not cutting them out where you, where you look at the, the Republican party and most conservatives have signed line and they did it very quickly when you think about it.

mainstream anymore. Right.

In fact, one of the things that's always talked about when you, when you see that, you

know, and I haven't heard much about it in the last couple of months, the JD Vance has to separate himself from Tucker Carlson. You know, see the lot over the past week or so about JD Vance and who he's aligned with and who, who thinks of him, you know, who thought of him, there was somebody they mentioned in an article that was, you know, I was close to him before and then now not so much.

And I thought to myself, you know, what direction is it going in 28 for, you know, because Marco Rubio is right up there, but he said he has said at least he has said it. I don't know if he's going to hold to that, that he would not challenge JD Vance.

“And so, you know, you look at at JD Vance and the question is, where does he stand?”

And it's kind of all over the place, you know, it's, there has to be a concern within the party. Well, I think, and, and again, I don't know, this is not my opinion. This is my observation of what's going on with, with Republicans, you know, we've talked about Marco Rubio and the polling numbers and the fact that he's doing very, very good.

I have no idea what kind of president he would be. Well, I mean, if he's going to act like he did as a senator, then I'm, you know, I may not right fully on board, but when you, when you look at the politics of it, the concern of the Republican party and many members of the Republican party is that JD Vance would be viewed as another term of Trump, right?

And they wish to move and go in a different direction, a significant portion of the Republican party. It's like fine, Trump did good time to go in a different direction now, still the majority of the issues are the same, but we need to sell it in a different way. And then I thought, but I want to get back here too, because I don't want to get too far off

the original topic. Okay. Okay. Just the whole thing with the, the DN said, just want to bring this up, can it, it's can raise money?

Tallerico can raise money. Why can't the DNC raise money? What is it? Is it because large corporations are looking at it and they're so unsure about the Democrats, because normally corporations will give to both.

They're hedging their bets, you know, you get some, you get some, you get, we don't know who's going to win. And so we're, we're going to give to both, why can't the DNC, because you hear about all this dysfunction, but precisely what is, is the, the, the, the problem, I can't think of the woman that was the bundler, you know, the, the, the, you know, the, the fundraiser

for Biden that ended up, remember, she left. Right. I don't know where she is right now, I've been seeing her, you know, do anything, but

she just, you know, she gave up, you know, as a fundraiser, she's basically because

a Democratic party is going crazy and they're just not, you know, that, you know, they're, they're just not in the, the mainstream anymore.

“And so she just, you know, she left, but what is the actual problem?”

Why can't one of the two major political parties as a party, not individual candidates, that is a party, is it because business and special interests, even look at them and just say, we don't know where the hell they're going to go because of the DSA is that the, and if you put, and this is where, you know, this is the carval, let me use the quote, if David Hog wants to take over, I ain't stopping you, go ahead, man, I really don't care.

And I don't think at the end of the day, well, they might be fine people. I know some of them are not particularly determined, and it's just like, what, where are you going? Do you want him or do you not want him? If you don't care why are you suggesting him, carval's, you know, in his throne or whatever

it is, his, his bed throne that he does all these different interviews in, at times, doesn't make any sense. The question I would ask him precisely is, why can't they raise money?

“What is the, what is any corporation out there that would normally give to the DNC?”

Why aren't they doing it right now? What is the problem? If you go to those, to those people in those companies and those billionaires, or whoever they are, that can raise a ton of money, why can't they raise money for the DNC? What actually is the problem?

And if you're saying, well, I want David Hogg in there, well, then aren't you saying all right, the DSA takes over?

Well, that's the first thing I read into it when I saw it at the Hill.

I want this new young group of individuals to come in and take over.

That's what David Hogg was calling for in his very limited time as second-in command.

And that's, you know, the first sergeant or whatever you call it, they're at the DNC. That was what he was screaming about. In fact, that was really what got him the boot, think about that.

“And that's why I look at Carvalgo, what the hell you're talking about?”

You're saying the DSA is killing them, and then you're saying, David Hogg should be the, the head of the DNC, none of it makes sense. And it's like you're calling them dysfunctional. Your opinions are dysfunctional. I get, I get the impression that Carval wakes up every day and sees something.

And it's not, and I mean, not the bubble of today, but bubble, the bubble of whatever post is in front of me right now. And then he jumps on it without thinking of anything, forget about the bubble of today. He's in the bubble of, of right now, and then he sounds off on it. Get out of bed every once in a while.

Maybe that much alcohol in your home isn't healthy. He's not sick or anything. I hope not. I haven't heard anything, but it seems like the guy posts from his bed a lot. And that's kind of creepy.

I haven't seen anybody abstain did that. What I haven't seen is any coverage from any major media outlet conservative liberal. What is the precise, we know it's a story.

The RNC, what has like 175 million, and the DNC is in debt and trying to use anything that

they had that they own as collateral to get loans to keep on going. Why?

“Why will not corporations and special interests give to the DNC?”

They can raise money for their candidates, what is the problem? Why can't they do it now? I'm okay with the DNC and not being able to raise money. I've just asking the question, what is changing, what in the landscape has changed over the last two years where the RNC is just getting money through the roof and the DNC might

be holding an auction, or you might see them on what is it, pawn stars or whatever. Or they have to get a big celebrity dinner, 20,000 dollars a plate or whatever, Julia Roberts comes in and makes a big donation, they have to get the big donors, and they still have the big donors, George Sorrows, it's still very active, we know that. But the reason you can't get the grassroots and the reason you can't get the corporations

on board, I believe, is very clear because of the direction of the party in those blue states, they know they want that nationwide that Democrats want to make sure that that kind of policy is going to be a national policy, that's the intent. And I go and I check it and I just put it into AI and I know all this stuff, but just just like, okay, what goes, is there anything new?

Because in AI and Google AI, they do tell you what their references are, but it's like the DNC is struggling with fundraising due to donor fatigue from the 2024 election and frustration with leadership about what? And then say, over post, over withheld post-election on it's high operational costs. Many donors and bundlers remain angry over how the money was spent during the 2024

presidential cycle, the withheld audits, low morale, why would there be low morale, carried over debt's expensive digital acquisition, dispersed spending, but you can make that case probably for any political party that they don't spend the money, the way you wish

“them to spend the money, why can't the DNC raise anything?”

Or do they look at it, do these bundlers look at it and go, we also give them a candidate because we know what the candidate will use the money for, which will be advertising. Right. But then it gets back to the content of the message. And I think this is something that's been, I don't think it's slowly boiling, but certainly

I've been on the plot for even going back further than two years.

Go back to 2019, December 3rd, 2019, Kamal Harris bails out because first of all, she's

just a weak candidate. Nobody knows what she believes because she can't form a coherent sentence. But she had no money coming into her campaign.

But I think if you apply that outside of her inability to actually form a sentence and

give a good speech, tell me who in the party has given a good speech that is really motivated people outside of the Democratic Party, outside of the radical faction of the Democratic party. Platner. Right, really, who was it?

It was Obama.

“If you want to talk about reaching out to outside the party and this euphoria that came”

about and led to the election of and his win in 2008, that was it. Okay, you don't mean Obama now, you mean Obama then. Yeah. Okay. Yeah.

Let's do that.

There isn't anybody doing that anymore.

We're going to punish punish punish punish punish punish punish punish. So you want the private sector who's going to get the brunt of that punishment to give you checks. You want the big CEOs, the big money makers in those industries to write you checks as individuals. Here is a combination of the fact of they believe the money was spent wrong and they also

see the direction and they look and go, you guys are being taken over by the DSA. We just can't support that. Well, that and and what direction? Because the rules change every day. I'm giving my money today because I believe in, you know, let's say it's mom Donnie or

I don't know, they'll see. And then all of a sudden, it just changes in a heartbeat because the rules, their rule book changes every single day. So what are you investing it? You might be investing in one thing today.

And then it's something totally different by the time you get to election day. We are right. I radio brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller.

“In order to manage speed, you need to understand the four factors involved in stopping”

of vehicle perception distance is the distance of vehicle travels from the time you see a hazard until you're brain recognizes it.

The perception time for an alert driver is approximately three-fourths of a second.

Reaction distance is the distance of vehicle travels from the time your brain tells your foot to move from the accelerator until your foot hits the brake pedal. The average driver has a reaction time of three-fourths of a second. Brake leg distance also needs to be taken into account. When operating a vehicle with air brakes, it takes about half a second for the mechanical

operation to take place. Finally, braking distance is the distance it takes a vehicle to stop once the brakes are applied. The distance is affected by the weight, length, and speed of the vehicle, as well as road condition.

“This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates.”

Visit us at JJ Keller.com. Get in touch with Red Eye Radio, toll-free, at 866, might be Red Eye. Beer and I radio. He is our Crony and I'm Gary McNamur. I was thinking of Lindy Lee, who she left the Democratic Party in late 2024, and was

a loyal fundraiser for them for years, actually, who has started fundraising for Trump. Yeah. It's interesting because, uh, young lady by the name of Evan Barker, uh, there was a piece in the New York Post the other day that I bookmarked, I was a ruthless fundraiser who helped progressives infiltrate the Democratic Party until it all became unbearable.

And she said, by, in March of 22, I realized the weight of what progressives had become. And it was unbearable. This was my last straw, and she voted for Trump in 24. And this is somebody who said, in high school, she actually campaigned for Obama. She was a community organizer for Hillary Clinton in 2015.

She did all these things helping, again, progressives infiltrate the Democratic Party. But it had gone too far in in 24. And she wrote a book, uh, based on that, called Nothing Left. Her name is Evan Barker, but it's, it's really interesting to, you know, to see this. Because if it is happening from within, it was bound to happen, because identity politics

builds this. Everybody has their own rule book now, and you don't want your an oppressor. Even Mom Donnie to a certain extent is becoming an oppressor. Oh, the hill says Carville is recovering from Ernie, it's actually a good one soon.

I will always have a complicated relationship with this game.

“But people evolve, total sports, do not make me regret this, do not make me devolve.”

Back to that guy that so many clones wish that I still was, and do not embarrass the entire country. Now, I can go back. I can get there fast, lose tonight, and you got a real problem. Do not blow it.

The Jim Rome show podcast. You've been warned. If I would listen on your favorite platform, scrolling with Hillary, I am Haley Carania. I scrolled with the homies here in the live chat, because there was a lot to scroll through

on X on Instagram, on TikTok, cutting through the clutter, one hot take at a time.

Love seeing you all in the chat before the show. I tried to jump in just a few minutes before to say hello.

“I love the chat interaction, thank you for helping.”

But I do it to get all of the videos and all of the content that you won't find anywhere else, scrolling with Haley to search that up, and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Ray Leapfactor Studio. And I'm Gary McNamara along with Eric Hurley, Fauci to testify later on today.

We'll get to that in just one minute. When it comes to supplements, two things matter the most. You want that supplement to work for you, and you want to know you can trust it. And I've been telling you about relief factor. That's here from someone else, Chris, he spent years doing physical work, leaving his

feet sore at the end of the day.

After starting relief factor, Chris felt so good that he did something he'd never done

before. Actually, ran a half marathon.

“Now he tells all his friends about relief factor.”

Well, thank you, Chris, for sharing that and you kind of make me feel jealous. I'm not going to promise. I'm going to be running a half a marathon anytime soon, but relief factors sent me some product to try. And I'm telling you the before and after is remarkable for me.

My lower back, my joints, just the eggs and pains from aging and all the years of running myself. Of course, those were getting to me. And thanks to relief factor, there are no longer a daily factor in my life. Let's get you started on your three week quick start.

Just 1776, go to relieffactor.com, call 804 relief, 800, the number four relief. And the friendly local team is going to help you get back on track. And maybe soon, we're going to share your relief factor story right here. You know, we've gone over the things that Fauci said and what the truth ended up being numerous times here, even in the past week and a half knowing the Fauci was going to testify.

Just wanted to talk a little bit about the response I saw on social media yesterday. There really was no response to what he said versus what the truth was from the left. What I saw yesterday was, you know, Fauci's a great guy. He's really a great guy saw someone and said, well, I don't believe he's evil. He's just, he's extremely vein and yes, he did misleading it a bunch of things wrong.

Well, I saw, I forgot who what was in the mainstream media say, well, yeah, it shows the contradictions. But there's no smoking gun. I went, it's sort of sort of like we've been asking the question, you know, what's Trump, what's transphobic mean?

What is a smoking gun mean here? He can't be charged with anything except lying before Congress, where what I want from this is a document in history of what we were told by officials like, you know, like Fauci and what the reality actually was and why they were attempting to hide the truth. And there's no doubt in my mind at all based on the evidence.

I don't base it on the fact that Fauci wants like Trump, a doored Trump and then dislike Trump and then like Biden, I don't make my judgment that, oh, he's such a grandfather like a figure, none of that at all taints our impressions at all. It's simply what he said and what he did based on what we now know is fact or what he did to hide any type of any other opinion, for example, as he did when it came to where COVID

came from, where what he was saying in the diaries was not what he was saying in public and he needs to be held accountable or not accountable.

You need to get him on record so the, so history, the history cloud, I keep saying the history

books, so we won't be reading books in, in the, by 2036, everything stops as England

“on Musk has said money, it doesn't matter anymore or whatever, I think we'll have to talk”

about that one. But that's, that's really all I saw, nobody will actually address on the left. What Fauci said privately based on what he said publicly now, the only other thing I saw and they were jumping on it was that, well, was his diary and the government has no business going in a diary, from what we know, everything that he wrote was on government

servers. If you write it on government servers, it's not private and it was so funny because there was a debate area yesterday going on into, they, they, they, they weren't a diary, they were on public, you know, the, they, they, they were on government, you know, government servers so you can have them.

Yes, but they were still a diary and they were still as private thoughts. It's like, oh my god, yeah, this is, you know, the, as you know, the devolution, devotes should have done a, a, a song, a devolution of the internet and social media because it was just, it was just hysterical and then that became the sidebar, it's like, well, it's, it's kind of diary, but of course a diary can be, you can call whatever you want.

He wrote stuff about what he believed and it was different than what he was saying publicly, whatever the hell you want to call it. Well, nobody's making the claim that it was illegal to obtain this information, nobody from the beginning, in fact, right? No.

In fact, the liberal activist media ignored it. Yes.

“And so now you look at it and say, does anybody debating whether he wrote this or not?”

No, they're not. That's how it matters. And so let's, let's now get to the truth. The American people deserve the truth on this and you know, this is the same group. They built this adoration for him when he was telling them to, to mask up when he was telling,

you know, basically because he brags about getting the school shut down.

Yeah. And I lied about that. Right. Yeah, you did on that. Absolutely.

But then in his diary, dear diary, how did he start those notes? Dear me, you are so wonderful. And loves you, the newsweek piece was so terrific. Oh, gosh. Well, it's, it's just, this is the kind of ego that comes with the kind of attention and

power that you get in a situation like that. And for someone in that position, it's, it's rare. Let's hope it's rare. Let's hope that we don't get to a pandemic with something else more dangerous. Which is the whole point.

Right. To the truth, how did this happen? I did see, I, you know, because I went through so many comments. I did see, I don't know if I saved their house. See if I did.

But I don't, I don't have that window up here at the moment, where somebody was saying, don't you understand what was going on? There was pure panic. There was pure panic. There was, well, right.

And when there's pure panic, the truth should come out. You just don't say there was true panic.

So whatever anybody says goes because you'd never say that about a Republican.

Right. If it was a Republican candidate or whatever.

“And so no, the more the crazy panic happens, the more important it is to know what the truth”

is. For example, putting seniors close together during COVID in nursing homes and putting people that had COVID in there. And we had already learned a lesson from that and how dangerous it was yet Governor Cuomo at the time, yeah, believed it wasn't that dangerous.

And so yeah, the more the panic, that is not the just, well, you know, because there was so much panic, it justifies anything that he did. What does it? No. Just the opposite.

No. Of scientists is not panicked. Right. It's to get down to exactly how this happened. And you know, this was the real tell in the back and forth between Fauci and Rand Paul.

Was the fact that he was so evasive in his answers. Keep in mind, he's not in an elected position, right?

He's not, he's not there to do anything except talk about the science behind what happened. His expertise, his purview.

“And the only thing he did is run around in circles.”

What would have been early on, the right thing that you could say would be fair for Fauci

to say, you know, because we know they held the meeting and it was basically 10 to 2 that

the people in that meeting with Fauci, 10 to 2 believed that this thing could have been made, you know, could have been made by, you know, by man, right, this was done and it was 10 to 2. He wasn't from, he didn't come out and say it was 10 to 2. He should have said we have a meeting where the majority believed this and a minority believe

that we're still searching it. That's a solid answer. Right. And by the way, would be the truth. Right.

And you don't have to commit one way or the other. Right. It could be, why could, and we're still doing research on it. Right.

“And I haven't made up my mind on it yet, but you don't sit there and say, especially when”

we know, think about this.

Oh, my gosh. I mean, they knew it. But in January, it was January, he was saying that it didn't come from the market. Yeah. We weren't even, we were hardly talking about COVID in January.

No, in fact, it really didn't heat up until the end of February and into Marrite. And then by April May, where they're still talking about it came from the market. Right. And, and that, by the way, that helped drive the panic that nature created this. It means it could be anywhere, anywhere, anywhere.

If nature created it there, why can't it create it in the United States and a thousand other places? Before we're talking, well, no, if we would have said no, we believe it was man-made and probably came from Wuhan. That's the majority consensus at this particular moment.

Yeah. And then you saw the whole thing about the CIA when he talked about the, that, that, you know, that was publicized a lot yesterday. Mm-hmm. But the CIA had said no, we believe that, you know, China is involved in this.

Right. And then why?

“Because remember, when the president was calling it, the China, if I remember how, to”

it's calling it, the China virus was racist, talking to that, you talked about it yesterday, was it Pelosi going to China going to China, we won't deal with this racism. Right. You're bringing racism into anything, and this is simply a, this is simply a disease. And the goal is to figure out where it came from.

And so you tell the truth, if you would have told the truth and said, no, we believe it came from this particular source. And probably the consensus from the scientists so far early, the majority believe, not that there isn't a minority that doesn't believe otherwise. But the majority believe this, people would say, OK, we know we're ground zero is.

We know it's not going to just appear in Louisiana. Well, you know, and for the left, it didn't break until John Stewart went on his buddy's TV show. And even called it. And what was that?

22 or it was it was late in the game. It was late in the game. And you could not talk about it on social media. If you tried to say anything about it, then you were going to be throttled. You were going to be shut down.

Your account was going to be suspended. And he goes on of all shows, the Colbert show. And does his rant, June 14, 2021. Yeah. So we're talking well over a year into this whole thing.

Yeah. And you couldn't talk about it. You could not post anything. And the left and Stewart making the point in a funny way. But it was funny because it was true.

It was observational humor that had every bit of truth behind it. And after that, the liberals just kind of broke away. They were just like, oh, maybe we could maybe we could talk about it. Maybe we could at least have a discussion about it. It started to break open.

On the right, we were looking at it for what it was.

There were things we didn't know in the first month, and the first two months in the first

three months. But we started to see the pattern and quite frankly, we assess our own risks every single

And we know with a virus that acts a lot like the flu, you protect the elderly and you

“often protect children and anybody with any underlying disease.”

And those were the basics. We knew that. But they wanted more control. And they were good. Well, that was initially on.

Then we found a later you didn't have to protect the children. Exactly. No, I'm saying that was no for, yeah, and for that was the exception to that. With that virus, children actually in any age group were actually the safest. We are running radio.

Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Hartley, it's Red Eye Radio.

We are running radio. He's our currently an I'm Gary McNamara. I saw a number of people on the X, say, well, I believe Foxy is going to take the fifth. It's like, well, why, he doesn't need to take the fifth.

Yeah. Right.

“The only thing that they came in Homer said yesterday is we know.”

He was pardoned, you know, he was pardoned for anything he might have done. Right. So if he comes out and says, no, I stole money. I stole COVID money.

I'm not a, you see, I'm doing that.

Hypothetically, it's just couldn't do anything. The only thing he can be charged for is line before Congress now. That's it. Yeah. Yeah.

Why would you take the fifth? Right. You would only, you would only take the fifth because you don't want to go down in history as somebody who said one thing and leading the COVID fight, you know, well, believing one thing or not reporting the truth to the American people.

“After the our news is brought to you by how product is the how products dot com?”

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. Now it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the relief factor studios.

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley, and I'm Gary McNamara. We've had a lot of talks and see the DSA has come around about socialism and communism and free markets and capitalism and all that neat stuff.

It's a great opportunity to talk about it. I was just looking at Jonathan Turley from yesterday on X. It appears that the majority of Spaniards are not feeling that warmth of collectivism. A new poll shows six out of ten Spaniards hold negative opinions of the socialist prime ministers government.

This is why socialist often have to wait for memories to pass to get young people as in New York to embrace their ideology. It is a cyclical boom and bus pattern where socialist waits for new generations to buy into the same failed policies of prior generations. I've been saying that for years.

It's cyclical. You wait for a new generation that knows nothing about it. And that's exactly what happens. It's interesting because I don't know to what extent young people are willfully ignorant and on what topics, but clearly anyone supporting the DSA is willfully ignorant or for some

demensed reason believes socialism and communism can work. Maybe they're buying into that whole thing that we heard a few times. Oh, but this is America, we can do it right. We'll do it differently. It doesn't work that way.

And it never has. And it's interesting. I was watching the opening remarks. I was actually from C-SPAN. Margot Cleveland reposted it on X and I forget the account that posted it.

But it was just as Scalia from years ago talking about what sets us apart.

Our Constitution, the separation of powers, and it's a very interesting speech impact

I'll repost it.

“It's a very interesting speech that he gave and he's absolutely right.”

And the thing is, as they believe these individuals are either clueless or they want to be part of the power grab. Because if you're clueless and you think you're going to get something out of it, and there were plenty of those during the Obama years. They thought things were going to change.

They were going to, he's going to pay for my house, he's going to pay for my car, he's going to do all of this. There were people, the day that the Affordable Care Act was signed into law. There were people calling doctors offices saying I wanted to appointment because Obamacare. So there are plenty of people out there that are willfully ignorant and we say willfully

ignorant, you've got to go out of your way to not know the facts these days because everyone has a smart phone. You can't make an excuse in 2026.

“I think one of the best things that has come up, though, is mom Donnie's grocery store.”

Yeah, because you and I always, we look not what's being said necessarily inside the

Beltway, even though what you can get on social media at times is still within the Beltway, but it's, you know, maybe it is more people that agree what's inside the Beltway, but are actually outside the Beltway, but they pay attention to it. But, you know, we know you can tell by social media if the liberals believe they have a point.

Yeah, they will come out and defend it. You and I were talking about the whole Fauci thing and it was like, okay, what are they going to come out? What are you? And the first thing I saw yesterday was a bunch of posts saying, these are his private

diaries.

I'm like, okay, that's the first shot.

It's false because they were done at government servers and that's going to be the answer to it. That was the answer that was gotten, but, you know, that was okay. Let's throw this, let's throw whatever we can, you know, at the wall and then just, you know, see where it goes.

But, you know, of course it was a bunch of malarkey and with the grocery stores. Do you see any liberal, I've not seen a liberal say this is a great idea because any liberal knows they understand the bureaucracy that is created, you know, we talked about the amount of money we've gone through, what it caused to build and start up a grocery store in the private sector compared to how mandomony is doing it.

We've talked about how socialist and communist have to lie. You're going to have cheap groceries 30% off on these particular items.

“We've already told you what's going to happen and the fact is they aren't because they”

have a superior business model being able to lower prices 30%. They're simply having somebody else pay for it. And so the entire thing is a lie. And as we said, liberals can't argue with the point, the old Milton Friedman point, that if you're going to have welfare, get rid of the bureaucracy, don't have 27 departments

handing out money. You create an unnecessary bureaucracy. Simply say, bring your double, bring last year's earnings, show us your ID and we'll give you a $100 a week. Yeah, go to the grocery store and get what you want.

If they really, if they really was to help people, right, if they really cared, that's what they would do. They would not set up a bureaucracy. They would not set up a bureaucracy where so much of the money is wasted and not going to the people that they claim to help because there's only going to be a very small portion

of what's in the grocery store that will be 30% off or 30% lower, which somebody else is actually paying for. It's not really 30% lower. Why are you creating a grocery store where the majority of things will be market price, yet you have a huge bureaucracy running it?

Yeah. Why? Yeah, this is, again, a demonstration of, well, it's an attempt at a demonstration to show

Let me change this.

“You would have to because it's going to happen if you just give out the money.”

It's not going to be paid for groceries.

You would have to, with the local groceries in whatever area you wish to develop more access to people being able to get groceries, you would give the voucher to them that could only be used at that particular stores. Food stamps. That's what I said yesterday.

Yeah. You just give them food stamps. Food stamps would be right. City, city, administered food stamps. It is the way to go.

Right. If you actually really want to help people, right. If you truly cared about the people that you claim that you care about, you would make it so they could just go to a regular grocery store with the money that they have. You would not set up something where so much is wasted in a bureaucracy.

That is the proof that Mandani actually doesn't care about you. Right. I argue that point liberals, you can't. Nope. Just see that this small business people, I just love this one.

The immigrant community has filed suit against Mandani creating unfair competition. And it's the immigrant community, the bodegas, whatever. The immigrant, so Mandani is working against the immigrant community also. Well, you know what?

He is that, I always pictured the government's own grocery stores, the mumdonis come

shop at Mandani's store. I pictured it basically as a bodega because it was going to be limited in its offerings. And it was going to be, you know, smaller than your massive stores, these aren't going to be giant stores.

“The last thing you want, by the way, is the media walking through because remember that”

30% discount is limited. Yeah. So, all that stuff is going to be gone. Which means you're not going to have the same supply chain run. They're going to be just like in the Soviet Union.

It's your empty spots on shelves. And the media is going to be walking through with cameras. And at the media's not doing it, YouTubers will be doing it. Oh, yeah. Yeah.

Don't get Michael Rapaport started, it'll be the first one in with a camera.

And that's what you're going to see. You're going to see how sad it really is and how horrible the idea is. But I want to go back to what you said a minute ago, who out there on the left is promoting this as a great idea, a side for Mundami. In fact, Mundami is in, he's against the ropes.

He's in defense of posture. He's having to answer specific questions. This goes back to that group of individuals and this is a significant group that said they before the election, they were going to vote for Mundami, but they also believed his ideas wouldn't work.

I can't explain. They just liked the guy. And it was just going to be based on that. I don't know. I can't tell you.

But this is what happens. What should you see? What do you normally see? Even the Green New Deal had more Democrats on board trying to push it. Yeah.

“And it's a horrible, I mean, it would be a massive, massive step toward communism, right?”

And you had, but you had Democrats out there pushing it and pushing it and pushing it. In this case, Mundami seems to be the only one or anybody in this administration. And where is the hype? Because wouldn't you, even if you're not in New York? Let's not even include AOC. If you're a Democrat outside of New York, wouldn't you want to demonstrate that this

could work? This is going to work. This is a great idea. This is why it's going to work. And eventually we could do this nationwide.

Wouldn't that be the hype? Yeah. I haven't seen, I haven't seen even the DSA jump behind. You would think that they would jump behind, you know, they would jump behind nationalized grocery stores.

Right. Now, they talk about, you know, all large corporations should be government owns. So maybe they've just thrown that in.

It's a given that might be grocery stores, yeah, just to get, just to give it.

Yeah.

“It's like, well, no, we don't need to talk about it because it's going to be a given.”

Yeah. There's a public of croaker. I like croaker the way it is, leave it alone. It's, you know, it's the, but this is, that's it, that's, that's, they would. This would be, and by the way, we asked yesterday because something came up, there was

a line about the, the workers. And we were wondering if that means they would be prevented from forming a union. From, from, yeah, because we had seen that it's, it's, the, what was the word, what was the wording that we used? I forget you and I saw the wording, what it was, and I asked the question, does that mean

they can't strike? Right.

Are you taking away their ability to strike?

Right. That what you're doing there. They, they get a government city union, you know, but they don't get the, and, and are, those, now it says, you know, there's going to be private sector involvement here, but there also has to be on the ground in those stores.

There would have to be some government, some city workers, right? I mean, are they going to, they're, private contractors are going to run the stores, they

“say, well, that's what they say, but it's, some level, where does that, where is that”

divide? Right. Where is that? And the private sector, or the contractor, you know, it's, it's all in, you know, it's all one and the same because they have to play by the city's rules, whoever the contractor

is. The, the biggest kick I got out of it, it hasn't happened yet, but I, I, I was anticipating it, was when I saw the immigrant business owners sue, Mimdani, citing unfair competition. And I want to see the defense of the city. Well, these immigrants are ripping us off.

Yeah. Exactly. I'll just see that coming from the, the, you know, I mean, no, that, it's not the immigrants, the Jews are controlling the immigrants who own the bodegas. Oh, well, it will be, if the left is spouting it, you know, there's going to be anti-Semitism

in there. It's like, I was trying to figure out how do you get anti-Semitism into the, that's, no, that, that'll be, that'll be it. That'll be, I'm, I'm sure something's going to be, I want, the, the Jews own the commercial property that the immigrants buy and so if we, again, do price controls on even commercial

real is real estate, right? Yeah. Well, you know, and that's, that's their conundrum is that they're not going to be able to promote it. You can't, how do you even advertise it?

“What's it going to be on the mayor's website on the city website?”

I mean, you know, it's going to be all over the news.

They're going to get a lot of free advertising when the first door finally opens, I don't

even know when that's going to be, they've pushed it back and the costs are skyrocketing. What has compared to what they said will be initially going to be. It would be mob day one. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

If I lived there, I would go out of curiosity, so would I, yeah, I'd, I'd, I'd be like Michael from half a fort with my camera going, but I, I definitely want to check it out. And I think US, one of the best questions yesterday, will shoplifting be encouraged because they're only trying to get food. Well, that's a government grocery store.

Right. If there's because if they're stealing food, they're only trying to feed their families. Right. But you heard right, I radio. This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by house products tested, trusted,

guaranteed since 1920 extreme heat in the western two thirds of the nation is expected to continue. An example of this record-breaking heat from USDA Birologist Brad Rippie. Saturday July 25th, we actually saw an all-time record high temperature of 112 degrees in Rapid City, South Dakota.

And while high temperatures are expected to back off slightly this week, potential agave packs remain, putting a tremendous amount of stress on range land and pastures as well as rain-fed summer crops. And even for irrigated crops, new temperatures get up in the 110 degree range, and that can really take a toll on those crops, not to mention boosting irrigation demands to an

extreme level just to keep crops somewhat healthy in that extreme heat. Relief, however, comes to the central plains this week. As leakage to the southwestern mod, soon, is bringing both cloudiness and rains to parts

I'm Rod Bay and we're reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C.

“This report brought to you by Senax fuels and loops.”

He winds up in for your goals, 866-90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our currently in I'm Gary McNamara, so we started this thought talking about Jonathan Turley talking about Spain and how 6 and 10 now don't like the Socialist Prime Minister where socialism is going in Spain and he made the point he goes, look, they just weighed

out generations. It's cyclical as we've talked about before, and it comes back again, but if you look at history, we look at the history of economic societies, you know, the one that works the most is a one that's voluntary. Sure.

That's free markets. Yep.

And when you start coercing, people you start preventing the marketplace and when government

starts wanting to control the means of production and, you know, and own corporations. That's when the people that claim they hate monopolies love the ultimate monopoly that's using other people's money. Right. It's amazing.

., and he's our probably non-curry McNamara. It's just a couple of years ago, who had the one same person in the Democratic Party John Federman, who had that two, three years ago, who had anybody have that bad? Anyone, anyone? Anybody make that bad in Vegas?

Anyone?

We'll get to that in just a minute.

Everyone's talking about weight loss injections because the results are so dramatic. They work by lowering blood sugar and reducing appetite. So what if you're looking to lose weight but not interested in painful weekly injections, especially some of those intense side effects?

“That's why doctors created a weight loss supplement called lean and the results are remarkable.”

The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to lower your blood sugar burn fat by converting it into energy and curb your appetite cravings and hunger. But lean is not for the casual diet or with only a few pounds to lose. The doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition created lean for frustrated dieters with 10 or more pounds to lose if that's you.

Let's get you started right now with 20% off and free rush shipping so you can add lean to your healthy diet and exercise plan. Go to TakeLeane.com and enter Red Eye. That's TakeLeane.com and enter Red Eye for your discount and let's get you started. Not FDA approved results vary.

I was just going through it again, social media yesterday and it's like, "Oh, Fettermin's appearing a lot." Let's hear what John has to say.

“Now, remember how liberal people thought he was going to be.”

Yeah. Yeah. And now his popularity with Republicans is probably 40/50 points higher than Democrats. Oh, yeah. That's the problem.

But here's Fettermin on CNBC. Here we go. I agree. That's my point. I said that on my own socials.

I'm like, this is not a big tent kind of like, "Well, you know, like, you know, abolish prisons abolish the border, abolish the presidency, abolish the Pentagon." I mean, these are crazy people and now they are electing people across our country, you know, Colorado, even in my own state, definitely in New York City right now. And some of those people like Miami are doing dangerous thing.

Could you imagine if I just announced that I'm going to arrest so and so in Pennsylvania or you're not welcome here in my state, you know, he's a clown and now he's putting the list of people that owns homes in New York, you know, don't put people on lists. They haven't done anything wrong. And they're behaving in truly bizarre ways and that seems like what the DSA wants more

and more and now why aren't more Democrats isn't it, it's incumbent on us Republican and

Let's get more from Fettermin here.

Here we go. This is not a big tent kind of like, "Well, you know, like, you know, abolish prisons, abolish the border, abolish the presidency, abolish the Pentagon." I mean, these are crazy people. Okay, it's the same one.

The intro was, it said it was different, but let's go to, this is, again, another Democrat.

“This is a, uh, Melissa Dorosa, remember who worked for Cuomo?”

Yeah. Yeah. All right. Right. So she's a Democrat.

Here we go. All right. Dana.

I don't know who in the DSA brain trust is sitting around saying it's a good idea to unleash

the cast of one flew over the Kuku's nest within a hundred days of the midterms, because right now the best thing that the Republican Party has going for them is the DSA media tour. Yeah. I mean, seriously, it's the only lively part of the party, right? It's, and I say, lively because it's getting all the attention.

“They are doing every media, any and every media, they're doing the, the, the more, right”

landing media. The DSA is out there. I, I, I saw this article, uh, Abigail Anthony, National Review. They have no idea what we think. The online discord about ideological bias in academia proves that leftists do not know what

conservative beliefs are in the past week. There has some, uh, been some popular threads and insightful discussions on social media about the presence of conservatives, uh, and conservatism, uh, or more accurately, the lack thereof in universities below, I paraphrase responses contributed, uh, by individuals defending the state of academia in no particular order, all right, and just as what, uh, she's doing

to make her point conservative supposed education itself. This is what the left saying conservative supposed education itself independent of what is being taught at educational institutions or how they lean politically. And therefore, do not train enough qualified people to work at universities. Universities are for literate people.

Therefore, conservatives are excluded. Universities do not directly discriminate against conservatives on the basis of ideology. They simply maintain rigorous intellectual and scholarly standards that conservatives failed to meet. Uh, uh, conservatives necessarily hold conservative beliefs, none of which are intellectually

defensible positions, and therefore conservatives are unfit for academia, uh, five conservatives support Trump, so they must be stupid and therefore do not belong in universities. Intelligent people lean to the left, and because academia is for intelligent people, academia leans to the left, academia leans to the left because reality and truth lean to the left. Universities do have viewpoint diversity by virtue of having different disciplines and

specialized schools, therefore the complaints about a lack of viewpoint diversity is unfounded. Right. Yeah. Yeah.

Conservatives are almost always bad writers, and therefore do not meet scholarly standards.

Okay, conservatives are anti-intellectual and do not believe in the underlying methodologies necessary for producing legitimate scholarship, and example of conservatives rejecting, uh, methodology is apparent in their belief that there are two biological sexes. So you are not an intelligent person, your anti-intellectual, if you believe in the science

“of biology, by the way, that's the only thing that they bring up, which, of course, is”

the worst thing that they could possibly bring up because the anti-intellectuals are the ones that are defined science, but what's really interesting is I disagree with the premise of the article in the National Review, they have no idea what we think, yes, they do. That's why they won't debate. That's why they won't actually say, you know, for example, uh, uh, the conservatives

are right, socialism isn't going to work in grocery stores. They don't argue that point. Right. They're not arguing the points, you know, they're, they're trying, as we know, the, and since they brought up the radical transgender movement, that if you believe that there are

two biological sexes that you're anti-intellectual, how they won't argue the point. We know that. We know how, you know, how it goes in the radical transgender movement, you shut down the conversation, you need to shut up your transphobic, it's name calling. They don't want to discuss the issues.

It's just the opposite.

They don't believe they can debate them, which is why they demonize them.

Well, they've, and yeah, and you demonize in order to avoid the debate, you call them big. You call them, you know, whatever, and that's been their approach. You look at the DSA, they're not really even debating anything. It's not even a real debate, well, you're pushing socialism, you're pushing no national

defense. We sure are, you're pushing no police, yep, we sure are. It's not a real debate, they're just, it's like they think they've won and the debate is over that they've moved past the debate. Well, when you think about it, you know, I'm going to try this now.

When I, when I travel again, if I have time, I've got it.

I've got to stop, I've got to stop by the, the hotel that I stay in.

I got to stop by the bar again and see if I can find more liberals. I really haven't done, I really haven't talked to Annie, I've done that since about four months ago.

“When I met that couple, four, five months ago, remember that couple I was telling you”

about completely clueless, had no idea what was going on, no idea yet we're standing strong in their positions. And I said, well, yeah, but this is the way that it is. I can show you, you know, where it is, I can show you where you can find it from sources that you, I don't believe anything in the media, then how did you come to your opinion?

I got a blank stare back. If you don't believe what, what do you believe that?

Where did you learn what you believe?

They couldn't tell me and, and I would, I would love, I would love just to bring up everything that we've, you know, been, been bringing up about, you know, socialism and everything else. And see whether they actually, you know, what they actually know about socialism, yeah. Because you, you make a great point.

They're not debating, you know, for example, what I'd like to ask them is this, the, what's taking over the Democratic Party is a Democratic socialist of America. The leadership says they're all part of the big tent. Yeah, right. Right.

“Can you run it when you think, talk to the average normal person?”

We want to get rid of the police, defund the police, open borders, no national defense, and no national defense. No Senate. No. Yeah, before you even get there, because they have no, they have no concept of the separation

of powers. I don't want to, Eric, I don't want to make this, you know, I can use them, I don't want to make it too complicated. Yeah. I want to get to the basic instinct of government is there to protect you.

Yeah. But defund the police, defund border patrol and ice, because now that, the, the, the, the, the DSA saying that they said that last, last week, the co-chair, no, we don't want it. We don't want it. We don't want it.

Nobody on the borders. Nobody on the borders. No military. Nothing. We just exist as a geographical area, boost for that one.

Who on the Democrat side is for that? And why are you saying that that should be part of our big tent? Now, we can get into the next part with the no Senate and the, and no, no Senate, no President, no Supreme Court, because people are, well, I was going to be one, no, they're will not be one as we know it.

It will not be a president of the United States. It will be someone chosen by the legislature, which would just be the House and the Supreme Court would be under the whims of the House. You would have, you know, when you start thinking of one party control, what do you come to your mind? I don't know the Polyboro, yeah, the Soviet Union, but I mean, the argument, it's, it's

interesting, because all the people from the DSA are young and stupid, they have no idea

“of history at all. And that's why they go in there with this arrogant confidence like,”

what do you mean? Well, well, you know, well, prisons, no, we, you know, all right, we, we're going to have to, we're going to have to evolve out of them, because once you get rid of poverty, there's not going to be any criminals anymore. All right. You got to have your brick and mind. Have you paid attention to history at all? No one would murder out of just anger or some type of psychosis.

Eric, but you don't know, realizes everybody wants to work hard and earn a legitimate living. And Jeffrey Dummer just had a little more money. Wow, I think that's what they made

you just fed them more Cheerios, we wouldn't have cereal killers. That's right. That's

the problem. It's all this cereal, then Bernie would chime in. Oh, we don't, we had too many choices of cereal. Oh, it's the lack of cereal. Yeah. The argument can go both ways here. No, Bernie is going to be on the aisle. Look at all the choices in cereal. You're right. This is a problem. No, no, I was wrong. It's not the lack of cereal. It's the sugar in the cereal. Yes. The cereal killers are trying to do good by eliminating all the sugar

and children's diets. Wait for it because it just keeps getting more and more ignorant.

“It, it's not going to be long. It isn't going to be long. Wow. Yeah. I don't, I honestly,”

I just don't know what's going to come next from the left. I don't know what they're

going to promote and try and justify. If look, if the economy is great, people won't have a need to commit a crime. And the economy will be great because government will own all the businesses. That's right. And then government will care. And we won't have police, but we're going to have to police you. So we'll have our police. Now, we're going to limit the profits, remember, as the DSA official position, no double digit profits for anybody.

Yeah. Yeah. That's, you know, of course. And so they, I don't know why you would have

single digit profits. Well, they didn't. That was the fallback position. Right. From that

representative from the DSA last week. Yeah. Well, then what would the profit be? Well, certainly not double digits. Well, then 9%, 8%, 7%, and why? Why any profits? Yeah. If the government can provide that be a great, then why any profits? Why any, if you're going to limit profits, why have any profits? My name is getting 9% profit. I'm only getting 1% profit. That's not fair. That's not fair. That's not fair. We need to equalize profits.

That's right. Zero point zero. We are a red eye radio. We'll be right back with more red eye radio with every currently and dairy McNamara. We are Red Eye Radio. He's our currently and I'm Gary McNamara. It'll be interesting to see because you made a great point that even when even when the DSA, when the social is communist, whatever they are, anarchist social is communist, whatever. Whenever the DSA is on, you said,

there's really not a debate. Even if it's on a conservative network, it's more like really? Yeah. And what do you believe here? Really? Well, how is this going to work? It's going to work. It's going to work. It's going to work. Let's look at history. Do you understand history? There is in time in a two minute segment. Yeah. In fact, I think the conservative networks just want to get out the insane ideas you

“believe in. Yes. And their job is done at that point. Well, that's what they should be doing,”

but I'd love to see along debate. I don't think there's going to be one. This is Ridi Radio on Westwood One. The United States soccer Federation presents the U.S. soccer podcast. The place we're at, Megan Klingberg, a World Cup expert, teaches you everything that you need to know for this summer's World Cup. How special is it that we've been able to follow this young group of guys? It's been such a roller coaster of the motion. Did you feel the

intensity? White a bit of time energy ever, everything along the way on these guys, making the country proud. And I think they will the summer. The U.S. soccer podcast, presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. Hey, I'm Chris Fanfleet. Go behind the scenes and beyond the headlines with the biggest names in pro wrestling and beyond. Mr. Sandman. Oh, I ever wanted to be with a pro wrestler.

So I got to live my life. And they people were really happy. No heartbreak, kid himself.

“Sean Michaels. Do you think there's anybody better than you were? I think I was great at”

what I did. And I think other people were great at what they did as well. Great, Mrs. Moore, of mindset. I think that anything else. Mindset, motivation, insight with Chris Fanfleet. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.