08-25-26 Part One - The WDSA

politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting

your day.

“Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios.”

This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is here at Hardy and I'm Gary McNamara, slowly we're becoming a sports talk show. Yeah. We're on Red Eye Radio.

Let's see what's going on in the WDSA. That's right, the WDSA. The WNBA LG-9G-9G, no, no, no, no, no, the WDSA Democrat Socialist of America. Right.

Well, listeners suggested that it be the WNBA LG-BTQ.

Mine's more broad. You can't say broad. You say chicks. I'm sorry Frank Sinatra. Can't say broad.

What do you think Frank Sinatra? Broad. Chicks hate that. I did not mean it in that context. Yeah.

All right. So yesterday, the WDSA, the WNBA, well, the sources say this is a source story. I think ESPN had it first, CNN had it. The sources are that neither canter nor rice white will be eligible and they view it as

a stunt, but and by the way, they were never going to allow them to play.

That was never going to happen to begin with. Yeah. Right. I was like, okay, what's the response going to be? You know, canter, canter freedom, as he calls himself, canter.

He's okay, but rice white just is locked in on this because now that, you know, the sources say the WNBA is not going to, this is, it's mocking, it's a stunt, whatever.

“Uh, this, and canter said yesterday, what are they doing?”

I am a woman, what, what, they can't ban me. I'm a woman. And that's the whole point. The whole point is attempting to get everyone on that side to define what a woman is. And they will do anything, not to define, think about this.

They will do anything, not to define what a woman is, but rice white wrote this yesterday. Okay. I have, this is the best ever. I have, because he's just showing everything back at them, every argument that they have made.

This is their entire playbook, he's taken and he's put it into one response. Here we go. All right. Update. I have not received any official or unofficial communication back from the WNBA regarding

my eligibility. I will say as a black trans lesbian, the rumors of denial for my multi-spirit existence are concerning. I'd also like to remind everyone there is a trans genocide taking place right now in America, these kinds of casual comments lead to violence and our deaths.

If the sources are true, I would like to see the leak take immediate action to correct anybody who refuses to affirm my identity or use my pronouns, pay me. The WNBA leadership has to show up and do the work to tell a black trans woman, she is not a woman or that the trans experience is a stunt. Is absolutely transphobic, bigoted, and racist.

It's literally Nazism and white supremacy.

“I think the commissioner may be demonstrated, maybe demonstrating some white privilege.”

No. That was his statement. Yeah. Oh my gosh. You know, it's, I believe he was ready for this.

Yeah. I think he was prepared. It really is taking their entire rulebook and playbook and handing it right back to them. Because it is, you know, remember the Berkeley professor and Josh Holley in the back. Yeah.

Exactly. If you question, then sorry, that makes you a bigot. If you just ask questions, if you call this a stunt, then why would I not call it a stunt

Which we have seen time and time again.

And then they get heralded by the media and the activists setting new records. Well, not for a guy, they're not.

“So is that to not a stunt, want you can't have both?”

There either both stunts or they're both as you call it as your side calls it real. And you don't get to question it because that's bigotry. Right. And it could set off. You could, you could trigger a mental crisis with that individual or the entire group

of individuals simply by asking the questions that exchange between Josh Holley and that Berkeley professor, that's exactly how that went. Those were the rules that were written on that day and unrecorded by the way. And you either live by those rules or not. Now they do change their rules.

But if you change the rules, do they not apply to all? Do you only want to apply them to the ones that you say are committing a stunt? Yes. So if you wonder what a trans genocide is, the trans genocide is the fact that if you talk about it, trans people have a much higher rate of attempting suicide.

And so that's the genocide.

“Because it's going to be a little bigger, what do you talk about genocide just so you understand”

what their argument is?

And the, the, when you said these kind of casual comments, basically from the WNDA, lead to

violence and our deaths, that's the argument that they're making. And that's the beauty of this all. This isn't an argument of the right against the left. No. No.

The debate is the right is holding the left to their arguments and they're talking points. Right. And that's what Royce White is doing. That's why it's so beautiful.

Those are the opinions documented of the insane leftist radical trans gender movement in this country. Yes. And he's simply using their argument. That's right.

As you've seen, like, on social media yesterday, I mean, it was just a blowing up. It was like, they should have punished Sophie Cunningham. They should have kicked her out of the league. They should have suspended her because she's the one that caused it. And the WNDA should have responded by suspending her for her transphobic comments.

Yeah. And it's like, it's like keep, keep going with that, keep going that, see if that see if that works for you. And they just get blasted, absolutely blasted on social media. And that's why it's so entertaining.

It's not entertaining because this is an argument of the right versus the left. No. It's beautiful because it's the right throwing the arguments of the left against them to see if they'll defend it and they're doing everything to try to weave around all the arguments that they have made to promote radical transgenderism in this country.

And nobody knows what to do, except to say, well, you're mocking. You can't say that. You cannot. I said that you can't say that. That's your argument.

That's your argument. Right. That's not even Royce. Royce is, well, it is. It was Royce.

Royce. Royce. Why are you meant? Yeah. He's throwing your argument right back at you.

“So the standards that you set, and that's why it's so incredibly entertaining.”

Well, it's, and it's not, this is again, really not going to change. You were correct to mention that this is not going to happen.

It's never going to happen.

The WNBA and WNBA is not going to allow male players to come in. Right. They're just not. It's not going to happen. But they can't say it.

They cannot say it. They cannot say we cannot let biological males compete in our league. They can't say that out loud. How dare you by their own rules. They would love for this to be over.

They would love to move on. See what happens when you try to appease. The WNBA was created for one reason.

Low ticket sales and number two.

“Four women to have a league of their own.”

Yes. Biological women. Biological women. Right. That's the only thing I ever mean.

If I say women. Yes. And then someone you had, I forgot what team the coach was on. Where, you know, she was coming out, you know, we, you know, trans women trans. And it's like, excuse me.

You're the one that's out there promoting the fact that we had too many biological men. Yeah. As coaches in women's basketball and that has to, that has to stop. And the beauty of it was, and it was hilarious. We went through some of the, going through the post yesterday that some radical left

is posted in the responses to it where they said, well, you know, this is a, this is a joke. A trans woman is a woman. But a biological male is not a woman. And that's why they can't play. If it was like, you don't get to say that.

There's like, what, what? You don't get to say that. What the hell you're talking about. You, and you can't, you can't judge. You cannot, you cannot look at motive.

No, and so you're changing what's the motive. The motive is that they want us to define what a woman is. And we're not going to do it. We're not going to define what a woman is. But let me tell you what we're doing to protect women that we can't define what a woman is.

That's right. It's pure insanity. It's just, but it, but entertaining us hell.

And when I read the first time, because he just posted a couple of hours ago.

Rice, whites, comment, my God. I mean, I just, I couldn't stop laughing. And then I read it to you in our pre-show meeting. We're just with you. You're like, they're hitting, he's hitting every single,

Yep, argument that they make and throwing it back in their face. Everything, everything in their playbook. Right. And, and, and it really is. This isn't the point isn't, and he knows it.

The point isn't for him to play. The point is to force them to take a position, which I also don't think is going to happen. They're going to keep doing this dance until it's over and something else comes along. But it was inevitable that it would at least get to this point. It was inevitable. And, and what happens with the league that quite frankly.

I mean, you know, I mean, they're, I guess they're doing okay.

“Are they losing as much as the Stephen Colbert show?”

I don't know what that I didn't see. Somebody posted what they did in 2025. Yeah. I don't know what they're doing so far. You know, it's a, I look, you know, I have watched.

Uh, well, probably half of a couple of Indiana games. It's entertaining. No, it's good. It's good. It's not that it's good.

It's good solid basketball. It's not that they're not good players. Yeah. It's, they just hasn't caught on yet. They haven't created their stars.

You know, I mean, I keep seeing clips on my YouTube because I watched one. Of course, it comes up repeatedly in that subject.

And it's everyone basically who's who honors Larry Bird.

You know, he's the best. He's the best. He's the best. And then one day, there was a short and shack was on there. And it goes, you know, I hate to say it, but Dennis Rodman. You put Dennis Rodman in.

And he's going to be a monster on that court. And just he was just quoting stats on Dennis Rodman. He was he said, you know, say what you will about his personality.

“But, you know, so these legends in order to create these legends, you have to have time.”

And you also have to have superior performance. Will it ever be the NBA? No. But it has a room for improvement. I can't find take a sales.

No, no. I know that they did revenue sharing the salaries of skyrocketed in the last year.

And they had a $8 million revenue distributed to active players.

But I simply put into the WMBA make a profit. And they say, yes, the WMBA generated a business success in 2025 to trigger. It's first ever player revenue sharing payout. That wasn't what I asked. Did they make, if they met certain goals, did they make overall a profit?

Was my, is my question to AI? And I cannot get, I've not been able to get an answer looking at AI. And he sounds like they did. I mean, right, I would, you would assume that they, that they did. And by the way, I hope that they do.

I hope that the sport continues to grow in audience on television, streaming or wherever they are. And also locally at games. I, because I want that for the fans. I want fans to have whatever it is they're into. Hey, man, let's go watch this game.

That's not up to me to decide.

I'm not, you know, I never root for things to.

I hope this thing fails. I hope this, because that's kind of the attitude. There are a lot of jokes about the WMBA. A lot of jokes about the WMBA. And one of them was made on the SPs.

“I think it was a couple of years ago by Shane Gillis, the comedian who was hosting the SPs.”

And he said, you know, and so and so. And he made it, I think he made up a name from the WMBA is here tonight. And they showed this woman in the audience. And then he goes, actually, that's not really her. That's my friend's wife.

I knew you guys didn't know anybody in the WMBA.

And it's true. It was his wife. His friends wife, comedian friend of his wife. And who, by the way, looked more like Karine John Pierre than she did the WMBA player. But, but it's, it's, it's not a for me to decide.

I root for everybody. You know, ghost sports or whatever it is, whatever the endeavor is. But don't think for a minute, you're going to take aside and then have to back away from it and not live up to your convictions.

“You can't, you're not going to get away with that.”

And that has a tendency.

In fact, I think a potential to.

Actually, hurt the sport long term or at least for a year or so. And we'll see if that happens. We are right, I radio. Brought to you by hot shot secret. Hi, I'm Jen Lumis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller.

Once a roadside inspection is completed, the officer will close it out. If violations were discovered, most officers as a courtesy will explain the violations to the driver. If there were any out-of-service violations, the officer will normally explain what must be done to get the out-of-service order lifted. Drivers need to be very attentive during this part of the inspection. The driver also needs to read and understand the complete inspection report.

The driver has 24 hours to get the roadside inspection report to the motor carrier. If the driver will not be returning to a company facility within the next 24 hours, the driver needs to know to get it on the way to you via email, mail, or fax within 24 hours. This tip was brought to you by JJ Keller and Associates. Visit us at JJ Keller.com.

Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley. It's Red Eye Radio. [ Music ] We are in the radio and he is there, Crony, and I'm Gary McNamara. Okay, since our private organization, nobody knows if they made a profit last year,

but critics say they still haven't that the revenue share was based on certain benchmarks that of revenue increase in revenue that the league was meeting, whether that is indicative, whether the entire, because they're owned by the NBA. That's not individual owners. So whether they actually, overall, made a profit when you take what the revenue is

and expenses nobody knows last year. Or it sounds more like a bonus situation for hitting certain revenue increase marks. Revenue. They might have, they could have broke even critics say they haven't yet. Well, I, again, but there's no specific numbers that I have on it.

I hope they're successful. I hope it becomes the thing aside from any of the controversies out there. And also, I hope it becomes the thing beyond a couple of key players.

“I think any sport requires them each team to have key players in order to get that.”

That's what you need. It's, it, sports has become celebrity personality league. Yeah, no, you've got to, you've got to have those on each team. The U.S. soccer podcast. I knew it was Megan Klingerberg.

And after interviewing so many dudes during this men's world cup, I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. one Zash team players. I know the U.S. men's national team has changed how I think about myself, how I think about being an American, how I think about being on a team. It's one year out from that world cup.

You ready?

The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel.

Follow and listen on your favorite platform. [Music playing] Observing and analyzing the insanity. Very curly, and Gary McNamara might lead on Red Eye Radio. And he's there, and I'm Gary coming up in just one minute.

We'll hear from that Seattle Times columnist who quit his job because they wouldn't let him write on the transgender issue. Coming up in just a minute. Everybody's talking about those weight loss injections because the results are so dramatic.

They work by lowering blood sugar and reducing appetite. So what if you're looking to lose weight, but you're not interested in painful injections every week

and then those side effects too?

“That's why doctors created a weight loss supplement called lean.”

And the results are remarkable. The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to lower your blood sugar burn fat by converting that into energy and curving your appetite and cravings. But lean is not for the casual dieter. With only a few pounds to lose the doctors at Brickhouse nutrition.

Created lean for frustrated dieters with ten or more pounds to lose it. That's you. Let's get you started. We can do that with 20% off and free rush shipping. So you can add lean to your plan.

We want to see you succeed in this effort. Take lean dot com is a website. Take lean dot com, use the code red eye. Take lean dot com, use the code red eye. Not FDA approved results vary.

You know, one of the things that we've always talked about is how the mainstream media.

They're not journalists. And I remember, you know, we had set it a long time ago. But I remember the one time we really made the point was after the Mueller report came out. And you had, you know, conservative political analysts saying, We hope that the mainstream media now learns from this and that they become journalists.

And we said, please, come on, stop it. Yeah, no. Guys and girls stop it. They're not journalists. They're political activists.

Well, Matt Cawkins who left the Seattle times has been a number of, you know, different media outlets. He was on with the Glen Beck and had this to say about why, you know, what's going on in the management of the Seattle times. Saying it's this cowardice or is this ideology. I'm not exactly sure. I think it's a combination of both.

“I think there are a lot of people in the newsroom who are true believers who really don't think any of this stuff should be out there.”

And really think there's only one side of the story. I have a suspicion based on kind of other things. I've seen at the top that they really just don't want to upset the activists. If you will, the loudest voices in the newsroom. And I've seen this.

You know, editors at the top kind of recoil at some other things and kind of, you know, get skittish when it comes to other stories. It might not even just be mine. But you can really tell, like, if you kind of go against, you know, I don't want to get too political here. But like the left wing grain at the Seattle times, they just buck. They don't want it in there.

So I think it's a combination of both. But I think at the top, it's probably a little more cowardice than it is ideology. There you go. Doesn't matter what it is. You're not a journalist.

Well, that's the thing. You can call it whatever. And if you're not doing true journalism.

“It's, by the way, it's become, I believe, abundantly clear.”

I don't know anybody that pays attention to the media that doesn't recognize it. Because what you have here is people that are very okay with those so-called journalists being activists. And the rank and file left, they're fine with that. Now, I think there's times when they come back and go, they kind of cross the line there. That didn't work, that didn't work.

But it's not because they disagree with them in terms of ideology. It's because they didn't get the effort right in being an activist. If you're a far left rank and file, far left activist. DSA support, card carrying member of the DSA. Then you're wanting them to get it right.

And if, you know, again, if they go too far and don't nail it. That's the, this is their conundrum, by the way. And it always has been. It used to be, you know, that Barack Obama, when he was running for president, this was a real scenario, said marriage is between a man and a woman.

He's evolving.

Oh, no, we all know how he felt from day one.

He just couldn't say it. And now, the DSA and the far left, the radicals. They're, and they lead the party. They're the ones who have the party right now on their heels going, Oh, it's a big tent.

There are the ones who are saying it out loud.

“And I think the only time they have a problem with a liberal activist media type”

is when they don't go far enough. He said it was the fourth time. He hasn't been able to get a column. Wow. And he didn't, I didn't see where he mentioned what those particular.

That's interesting. I would love to read his book. I think that would make a great book.

It would, it would be, it would be a lot like bias.

Yeah, you know, I mean, it would be a modern, I guess. I don't know. I don't know. Yeah, this isn't new. But again, this is when when they call themselves journalists.

They're not. No, they're not. Because they don't want to cover the other side of the story. Right. We have strong opinions here.

I want to hear what the other side is. I want to hear what their argument is. I mean, that this entire segment that we've had is on the sources. And, you know, the saying what the WNBA is planning to do. This is about a specific, you know, a specific issue where the one side has been promoted.

And they keep trying to shut the other side up. By saying if you speak, it's violence and it's genocide. And it's, I mean, all these ridiculous things. I mean, it's completely and totally ridiculous. And it shows you just how, how left.

And, you know, I don't care. You sit there and you say, you know, well, as he goes, I think it's more cowardice. They're just afraid of the reaction. Well, then get the hell out of there.

I couldn't work. Could you work at a job? Where, where every day you came in and they just said, well, uh, you can't talk about that tonight. You can't talk about that tonight.

You can't give your opinions tonight. You can't. His only job is to give an opinion. Yeah. He's a columnist.

Yes. You know, so he's, you know, a, he's not technically a reporter. But the fact is, he's a columnist.

“And they're not saying, okay, you need to spell this wrong.”

We're wrong. Or this is too radical. Nothing that he is writing is radical. To sit there and say, women should be able to play sports is not radical. Right.

This is how far left is radical. They are where there are afraid of the response from people that are literally, hold an insane opinion, a completely unscientific insane opinion. And then I'm sure they're out there telling you work the credible news source for you. Yeah.

Well, you know, by the way, they would not respond to him leaving because it's a, and I love it. It's a personnel matter. But it's not. Yeah.

It's not. It's an issue. It's not just a personnel matter. It's a matter of, is he right? Did you not want that story to be printed and why not?

“That's what the question is where nobody's,”

nobody's wants to get into his HR file. Right. Well, I think there may be some CYA there because if they start making statements about it, then his lawyers would have a lot of leverage because of the nature of his job, what he is expected to do, what his, well, was expected to do.

What his role was. And it's, it's not new, but it's one more case. You know, it, it makes me wonder if they, if management, if the editors just kind of kept, you know,

if this wasn't the first time this has happened, if it's happened multiple times,

then they kept nudging him, knowing if they nudged him long enough, he would just go. He would just quit and they wouldn't have to get rid of him and make a big, you know, stink of it. So I, I don't know if that's the case or not,

but my question would be, then why, why did you keep, why do you have him on board? You know, there are things that are very clear. You know, you can't, you can't, you can't write an article about someone and commit slander.

plagiarize.

There are things that are very clear in four writers that are the rules.

And also have laws applied to them. But in terms of someone, a columnist, issuing their position, regardless of the position. And I still haven't, you asked the question the other day, last week I think it was.

“Have you heard anybody in the media, you asked this?”

Have you heard anybody in the media defending it? The liberal activist media really is what we're talking about. And because if this happened, where, I don't know, the Fox News fired somebody on the left, or if, you know, a, if the New York Post fired somebody

who was more leftist or something like that. If there was, if this was someone who had a liberal take on something and they had to leave, they felt like they had to quit because the pressure from management, the liberal activist media would be out there saying,

this is wrong, you know, this is what journalists saw, the, we're supposed to be able to do this. columnists are supposed to be able to do this, especially specifically for this type of role. And they would be out in defensive him.

I have seen none of that. Maybe I missed it. I haven't seen anything. And social media. Yeah.

You'd see it on social media. Right. It would be, it's, that's it. You're right.

“It would, that's where it would catch fire.”

Somebody would say, listen, this is wrong. I disagree. Usually it's, while I disagree with his position of, that he takes on this issue. And blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

You don't have to qualify. And then build some, you know, build a wall around themselves for protection. Then they come out and say, this is wrong. For him to have to do this.

For, for him to no longer be employed as, essentially, it's, this is his career. There's no telling now. I hope I hope he lands somewhere.

I don't know what's, you know, what's in his future. Uh, wish him all the best. He's doing stuff on substrate. Yeah.

Okay. And which is where a lot of people were going. Yeah. That are. And if you, you notice,

um, those that are no longer have a,

“uh, a media base, uh, or are going online”

where they can do what they do. Whether it's him or Don Lemon or anybody else. Well, it's obvious to anybody out there, the height of hypocrisy of this entire issue. Yeah.

You know, with the WMBA, mean the hypocrisy is just mind-boggling. It's just, you know, and, you know, the, uh, the, the, the hate. And this is where we talk about the,

the, there's two things that the left has done. By the way, somebody wrote the other day,

uh, basically what I've said before,

racism isn't the biggest problem. It's jealousy, envy, and selfishness. Racism is a problem on the left. Okay. I want to make that clear.

Yes. I'm talking about most people that, you know, that, you know, that, that go around independence, whatever. If you look at the majority of people, would be independence and Republicans aren't racist.

The left is Democrats have institutionalized racism through identity politics. Mm-hmm. And now they've institutionalized misogyny, the hatred of women.

Yeah. Uh, and the, the unbelievable thing is it is women that is the demographic that is supporting the hatred of women. You just look at it, you go, it's un,

it's mind boggling. I don't know what other words to do it because none of it makes sense at all. None of it.

It doesn't make, there is no critical thinking.

There's no connecting of the dots. It's pure rage and emotion based on complete and total idiocy. Yeah. Yeah.

It's, and that's where you go. How do, how do we win this if, if you've got, if you've got 40, 45% of the country that agrees with this. You know, how, how do you,

how do you get them to change their mind? And I did think I mentioned Victor Davis Hansen who, that I, that it was attributed to him. I don't know if it was, I saw it on X where the, the article is basically saying,

all these things that we just can't understand it's because they hate. Yeah. They're, they will go along with any position as long as they can hate you.

We are Red Eye Radio. We lined up on for your goals. 866-90 Red Eye on Red Eye Radio.

He's our Cronin. I'm Gary McNamara.

“You know that you believe that your argument”

is weak when you are afraid to let people know what the other side is. Yeah. And, and for us, I know for us. Uh, it's, it's, it's a joy to see the argument from the other side because for the most part,

it's become pure insanity. Yeah. But they say actually makes our arguments stronger.

But we've never been afraid.

The left is, the left does not want you to know. What the real arguments are from the other side. Yep. (upbeat music) Top of the our news is,

brought you by House Product Visit how products.com. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. The U.S. soccer podcast. I'm your host Megan Klingaburk. And after interviewing so many dudes during this men's world cup,

I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. as well as as team players. I know the U.S. men's national team has changed

“how I think about myself, how I think about being an American,”

how I think about being on a team. It's one year out from that world cup. And we're going to talk about the brightest prospects in U.S. soccer. Are you ready?

The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. (upbeat music) Now, it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything

from Father Ticks to Social Issues and News of the Day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are Red Eye Radio

and he is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. It can then get morning. Thanks so much for being here this morning. Thank you very much. You know, I had mentioned the left and the hypocrisy

of the obvious hypocrisy. Two examples came to mind. Two stories I've been sort of saving here. Jonathan Turley won the other day. That coffee roaster guy in Idaho that banned.

The teenagers, group of pro-life teenagers, calling them the equivalent of the Ku Klux clan and said this is my shop and you don't, and I can refuse you. I can refuse you because I don't like what you stand for.

Has the left gone crazy about that?

“Because remember when the left said that anybody”

on the right had to and they went to court and the liberal courts even ruled in their favor

until the Supreme Court finally get involved in it.

For example, the whole cake thing with the baker. I was willing to bake you a cake. I just won't put the message on. You had to embrace the message. That's what the left wanted.

You had to embrace the message. You had the Christian website designer who refused to provide the services for same sex marriage. I don't believe in same sex marriage. I'm not going to create that for you.

Everyone on the left. Did you know, did you? Was there one person on the left? One that you ever saw that said no. She can refuse it because obviously you're asking her

to do something that is against her religious views or the baker. Did anybody in the left say that? There hasn't been a peep about this guy in Idaho from the left at all.

Just giving you an example of absolute hypocrisy, which is just like the Seattle Times. We will only promote one view. There is only one view and it's our view. Quite totalitarian, which brings us to the next point here.

And this was John Funds column the other day, where he talked about the fact of the DSA. They want to go after all billionaires. Right. They have nothing to say about any billionaires.

Except the Del Castro. As he points out, as you says,

Socialists say you can't earn a billion dollars.

You can get market power. You can break rules. You can abuse labor laws. You can pay people less than what they're worth. But you can't earn that.

Remember, we said that one. There's one billionaire that the DSA does celebrate the late Fidel Castro on the occasion of what would have been Castro's 100th birthday this month. The official DSA praised him as an organizer,

a fighter, a stalwart, symbol of anti imperialist struggle and self-determination while bizarrely denouncing

against the Cuban people.

“This is that these are the heads, the leadership of the”

Democratic Socialist of America. And they refused to walk away from their statement of admiration for Cuba. Former univision anchor Jorge Ramos pressed the DSA national co-chairs on whether they regard Cuba as well as

Venezuela and Nicaragua as a dictatorship. Neither would say so. Roman fact claim that Cubans have access to their democracy in a way that we do not. She apparently believes that the Cuban government is more

democratic than the Americans. The other co-chair invoked a similar dodge of the U.S. embargo against Cuba as if that is to blame for Cuba's problem rather than the fact that Castro was a committed Marxist.

And it said when he died he was worth 900 million

dollars and it was growing. His extended family now sits on a cash reserves of 18 billion dollars. There you go hypocrisy. We only like billionaires that get their wealth from the

people because of a brutal dictatorship.

“That's what the DSA that now runs the democratic party.”

That's what the co-chairs believe. And that's where this would all go if the DSA were to be able to which they won't. At least not a lot of time. I won't say ever.

Yeah, my lifetime isn't that long. No, no, yours is listen. I'm just saying. You know, leave your car run. But it's, I don't even know what that means.

But it's, the, and by the way, I haven't said this in a long time. I've feel older than you actually are. So it's, so who knows? Hypocone.

It could be either of us to go first. But the thing is that that's exactly where if the DSA plan would be fully implemented here in the U.S. The U.S. S.A.

“It would, it would result in that kind of,”

hold on a second. Oligarchy. It would be the, a handful of oligarchs. You know, Elon Musk would have to give his up. But George Sorrows wouldn't.

You know, the, the, the, the, the Castro family. The airs to the fortune. Would be welcome.

I think, well, here's the thing.

With the DSA, if they ever got to a point, you know, again, full implementation, which is not going to happen. If they ever got to that point, it is Cuba become the 51st state.

(laughs) And they get to keep their regime in place. I'm not sure how it would work. But this is exactly what happens. The powerful get to keep their well.

You know, Bernie Sanders used to get to that point of view. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well.

They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well.

They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well.

They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well.

They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well.

They're going to keep their well. They're going to keep their well. It doesn't matter what level of office they're in. That's how they see it. Whether it's in the Senate with Elizabeth Warren or Bernie and the House with AOC.

They see themselves as well.

That wealth helps them help you. It's they justify it the same way that communist leaders have justified it over the years.

And it's always, by the way, always about what?

It's for the people. It's the people's republic. And this is what it comes down to. It's quite the opposite. It is not for the people.

Everyone is equally poor. And you are no longer citizens. You are subjects of what eventually would become a dictatorship. It's, you know, they try, they, I don't know what their man. I'd love to have been a fly on the wall in the meeting where they come up with these ideas of the house controlling the White House.

Just that part of it, right?

“You know, because they would compare it to kind of like parliament, right?”

It basically is what they're doing. It is like, well, we don't like that president. We'll just, you know, we'll just start changing election dates. You know, the moment where the, you know, that president gets out of line. Ah, you're out.

And by the way, I think by the time if that ever happened, again, it's not going to happen. But if it ever happened by the time we actually got to that point, it would be even some Democrats, even some on the far left. Well, you're not enough of a dictator. We want you out.

We're going to, you know, we, we're going to have a, what a, a vote of confidence. And we're going to install a new president. But it, this is, when it comes to the, the whole billionaire thing, only those with power would would be allowed to keep their money. They are, as you just pointed out with, with with the castros.

This is, sorry, but this is them looking away. I remember in 2012, Mitt Romney's running against Barack Obama.

Now Mitt Romney's net worth at that time was estimated to be about $400 million.

But he's job going in buying companies, breaking them up and, you know, and he, they just didn't, and he, remember when Newt Gingrich came out. Yep.

“And railed against that during the primaries, remember that, remember that,”

remember that Republican who got into space. Yeah. And said, when the hell did you become a, basically, a liberal Democrat? Exactly. It was just ridiculous. But, you know, the left, and I remember, and I think I don't remember if they source AP or Reuters or whatever,

but it was, I remember it was a Yahoo story. And it's, it was the billionaires who support Mitt Romney. And I'm thinking, they're leaving out the biggest liberal billionaires out there. The Bill Gates, the Warren Buffets, you know, Warren Buffet. And we talked about it then, because we were covering it then.

They've equally, in, in the spring of 2008, during the primaries season of 2008, gave equally a donation to the Hillary campaign and the Obama campaign. So it kind of squirreled out of that one.

And they never in that story touched on the billionaires on the left.

They didn't touch on sorrows.

“They didn't touch on any of those billionaires on the left.”

Because they're absolutely fine with them. What they do understand very clearly is that that wealth, and they'll make, they want you to believe. They want the P ons to believe that it is so that they can help you. These are the people who love you care about you and are going to help you.

So them being wealthy is helping you, which is absolutely ridiculous, except for the fact that if they create industry or innovate something, and they are a part of wealth expansion, then people may be employed by their properties. But that's not what they believe. When you have the Democrats promoting that the government having the money is going to benefit you.

That's the same as Bessent last week from the Republican side over the weekend. And I was last week talking about the fact that, you know, about the tariff money saying, Well, the American public had the tax money. We had it in the treasure department. The American public had their money.

No, they had their money when it was in their bank account. Where they come from? Not your bank account. So when you have Democrats and Republicans making the same, basically the same damn argument, you're in deep due to.

Well, this is where we're at that crossroads.

But politically, it's not just conversation anymore. When it's a sitting president in his administration. Saying ownership in companies is good. And or saying in the case of Bessent, that, well, this is the treasury is having to write all these checks.

Why are they having to do that? Whose money was that to begin with? Where did that money come from? When you leave out that big chunk of the equation, you're arguing like the liberal left?

Well, as you said, when you promote socialist philosophies,

you can never tell the truth.

Right.

“And the truth is both sides of the economic consequences.”

Yeah. And if you can't do that, then you're Bessent, because you know you can't defend your socialist economic policies. Yeah. We are Red Eye Radio.

This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by House Products. Tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. Impact from heat and dryness over the suburb on some of our nation's crops. Per USDA's latest crop progress report for the period ending August 23rd. USDA, biologist Brad Ripy says even with cooler temperatures

and much of the Midwest this week.

For crops there, reflect effects from extreme heat earlier in the season. And the perception is that conditions are dropping further for US corn. A little bit of a disappointing report showing just 57% of US crop good to excellent. That's down 3 percentage points from last week, 60%. Meanwhile, 17% very poor to poor.

That is up to points from a week ago. Extreme dryness continues to impact other crops in places like the southern plains. Now seeing 44% of the cotton in Texas rated very poor to poor. Not much better in Oklahoma at 41% I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C.

This report brought to you by Senox fuels and loops. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently getting dairy McNamara. You know, I got a great question from a friend the other day. They said, "Well, why doesn't California just tax billionaires more in their income?" What's the whole thing of the left money?

Because since we were just talking about billionaires, it's because they want to control companies. They want to control property. When you look at any money that you have, like your house, the money that you have put into your house, whatever, you pay taxes on that already. You've been taxed, you've been taxed on income.

All right, income isn't enough. The new Democrat Socialist that run the Democratic Party now. You know, they want a national well tax. They want California to succeed. Yep. They don't care whether people move.

That's not the point.

The point is that's the first step to gaining equity in companies.

“Yeah, right. That's what it's about. That's why.”

Yep. Could they do another income tax or increase the, you know, the capital gains tax on stocks and everything. Yeah, sure they could do that. But that's not the point. No, the point is an even immediate revenue. It's about getting ownership in companies.

Yeah, that's what the eventual goal is because if you can pay it. This is a whole thing with Rolkana when he came out and goes, well, we can sort of give you a loan and you pay it back. And if you can't pay back the loan, well, then we, you know, take your stock. And that's it right there. It was like right there.

All right. That's what you want to do. Yep. Yep. We want to go after the companies. We need to go after the people that actually have the stock and grab the stock.

“Because that's what he was talking about.”

And, you know, Mark Cuban was throwing a fit about, you know, about that one. We could have nobody invest in these companies. And if they don't care, they don't care about the economy. They care about control, power and control. And they get it.

They hope to get it through a well tax. That's just one of the avenues that it's not the only avenue. Yeah. But that's the one avenue they want to go down. Yep. You know, that's it.

And again, if you can, this is the, it really is the basis for going after billionaires.

We've made the argument.

“Many people, critical thinkers, have made the argument.”

You go after the billionaires wealth.

You're going after stocks. You're going after their ownership of their company. Or whatever company they may have invested in, not just their own. So you, because they're going to have to convert a lot of that stock in order to pay this massive wealth tax. And it's not a revenue tax.

It's a wealth tax. It's not an income tax rather than it. It's not taxing you on the profits that you have made. Right. You've already paid taxes.

It is confiscating your property. And by doing that, they know that would mean that those stocks would have to be sold. They understand what that means also for those companies. [music] The U.S. soccer podcast.

I'm your host Megan Klingerberg. And after interviewing so many dudes during this men's world cup, I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. One zash team players. I know the U.S. men's national team has changed.

“How I think about myself, how I think about being an American,”

how I think about being on a team. It's one year out from that world cup. And we're going to talk about the brightest prospects in U.S. soccer. You ready?

It really looks good. The U.S. soccer podcast. Please send it back home and listen on your favorite platform. [music] You're listening to Red I Radio.

From the Ridley Factor Studios. [music] We are Red I Radio. He is there currently. I'm Gary McNamara.

Good morning. Hello. Coming up in just a minute. What the Lieutenant Governor of Indiana, I believe it is, had to say about the WDSA as we call it now.

Yes. Women's Democratic Socialist of America coming up in just a minute. Lots of supplements out there on the market. You need them to do.

First of all, you need two things from your supplements.

“You need to be able to know that it works for you.”

You need to be able to trust it. I trust relief factor. I've been taking it for a while. They sent me some to try. And I'm telling you, I am absolutely convinced.

The before and after when it comes to my aches and pains from aging. And from all of the running I did for years. It was really starting to wear me down. And mentally, it kind of also took me out of the game. And now that I've been taking relief factor daily,

that is no longer the case, Rebecca was also hesitant at first. But she discovered how easy relief factor makes it to adjust or cancel any time. So now she says her knee pain is better. She doesn't rely on other pain relievers. Same here, Rebecca.

And she tells everyone it's absolutely worth it. Rebecca is just one of many. Let's get you started with relief factor. Your three week quick start is 1776. Just 1776.

Got a relief factor dot com or call 804 relief 800. The number four relief. All right. So this is Lieutenant Governor Micah Beck with. Let me just quote what he would he wrote on X yesterday about.

The Indiana fever game and. In his canter and freedom. Yeah, he also had happened on the floor. Yeah. I was appalled by what happened during the Indiana fever game last night.

Chicago's Natasha Cloud threatened former NBA player in future WNBA.

First round pick in his canter.

There is simply no place for this type of women on women violence in our society. And it needs to stop. Yeah. Tell him where he's wrong. You know, I'm I'm just I'm looking at the comments right now.

Hey, Mike, there has to be something else that can be a better use of your time. All right. Yeah, you are a you are a you are a joke. Think a picture on state first. Now you're actually Lieutenant Governor posting stupid.

No. That's that. When they go after the person. And that's all they're doing.

And you see that as basically the common thread in the thread of comments or responses.

That's when you know they've lost the argument. They cannot make the case. And when you do. I've dual sided yesterday on with Jesse Waters. By the way, Jesse Waters asks all the wrong questions.

Yeah. You know, you could destroy him now on this one. He destroys himself. And I think just need a pretty good job on on this one. But this was just I'm just going to play it.

Listen to this. Okay. There you go. All right. This is where you can't sell this.

Here we go. Sex changes for minors. Do you support that?

Look, you know, I remember having great conversations with my conservative friends about right to try legislation.

“The idea that the government shouldn't tell you kind of health care you should have.”

I just think the government shouldn't tell you who kind of health care you should have. And if you're a minor, you want to try on kids. Now, if you disagree with that, if you disagree with that, if you disagree with that, if you disagree that health care decisions need to be made by a doctor and their parents and a patient, then I just think we agreed to disagree.

But, you know, you want to put government in so that you're a doctor, right? So you're a doctor, right? Selectively. I am. So you think it's okay for a parent decision.

You think that's okay. I mean, do you really want to have this conversation? Are you circumcised? Yeah. But I mean, that's obviously our personal question.

Okay. Doc, so you're probably should want to move on. You probably should want to move on. A circumcision's different than castration. And I think it's a problem.

It's a problem that you think that you get to decide what happens between a parent, a doctor and a patient. And I'm just saying that yes, circumcision is surgery on a kid's tingling.

“So if you really want to bring that up, you can.”

I just think you guys are really selective about that. That's why these things. Abdul, Michigan's not going for that. That is sick stuff. This is where they are absolute sick perverts.

Wow. As perverted as sick perverts as you could possibly evil. I mean, that's just damn right evil. No difference between the two. Yeah.

Circumcision castration. Same thing. Yeah. No. And no.

Where he should have hit in the beginning of his, you're saying that cutting off a minor's genitals is health care. You're a damn sick pervert, sir. Yes. You are.

And you know there's a difference between circumcision. You know the castration. Because circumcision does not leave that child when they become an adult with the inability to decide essentially who they are, how they're going to live. Procreation, everything.

All the million. And I'm a layman. I'm not a doctor in the fact that I said that. You said the opposite means you shouldn't have a license to practice. Yeah.

How perverted. How perverted is the left on. And by the way, that is a mainstream opinion in the Democrat party. That's not. That's not a, you know, fringe.

No argument. They all agree with it. Yep. Same as circumcision. Yep.

“That's why I say he could, he could, he doesn't.”

I, I'm not a huge fan of Jesse Waters. Yeah. Yeah. He could be entertaining at times on the beach. [laughter]

Interviewing people.

But he just, he, to me, he always asked the wrong questions.

Hmm. Because he should have absolutely stopped him dead right there. And said exactly what you said. And live. Yeah.

Yeah. That's not a hard argument. It is not a hard argument at all to make. And it's, it's absolutely, in fact, I would, I would have stopped him to do it. Oh.

As a doctor, explain to me. And I mean surgically. And effectively. And functionally. The difference between circumcision and castration.

Explain that to the audience right now. Explain it as a doctor. Right. Because I'm just a guy on TV. Explain it.

Because if you believe there's no difference, you have no business practicing medicine.

You should be reported. You're an evil pervert is what you are.

“And I would have called him right on it.”

You're an evil pervert. You've got that point of view. And the Democrats that hold that point of view. That's now become absolutely mainstream, just sick, evil perverts.

Do, you know, because here's the thing.

Uh, for a newborn. Circumcision. The parents make the decision. And then you make the appointment. And you go in.

And you take the baby. One of the options is not castration. Yeah. It isn't. But for the far left.

Maybe it will be for newborns. We'll just start and decide our child. We will not.

“You know, this is why I hate the question.”

What gender would you assign at birth?

What do you mean assigned?

Yeah. This is the way my creator made me. This is, I was born this way as the activists would tell you. This is how God made me. And this.

So, but this is the next step. Which is why when you change the language, you start effectively. The ball rolling to where you can get to. Changing the behavior, which in this case, if they keep going down this road. Well, yeah, no, if a parent decides they wanted a girl instead.

It would be much easier to do the surgery as an infant. That's the next. By the way, tell me how he's not making that case. Here in this back and forth with Jesse Waters. He didn't come out and say it that way.

But he's telling you there's no difference between circumcision and castration.

Number one, it's not health care. No, it's mutilation. Number one is mutilation.

“Number two, to compare it to circumcision is completely.”

It shows you the argument you're trying to make to promote your evil, perverted narrative here. The other thing is, listen to how, say it tends to argue by saying, you really want to have this argument? You really, as if he has the upper hand in an evil, perverted argument.

It's not to make point that you can't sell to anybody out there, accept those that are delusional like you are. Yeah. Yeah. Just amazing.

You don't have a right to mutilate a child, even if a doctor is involved. If a parent and doctor decide to mutilate a child because they're the parent and doctor, they don't get to do that. No. And if you don't know that as a doctor, your license should be pulled right now,

because you're an evil pervert is what you are. There's no other way to look at that. No. No other way. From a common sense point of view, there's no other way to look at it.

Understand how radical the democratic party is with the DSA and people like Say it running for political office. You know, that's all part of the big tent. Utilation of children under the big tent. Right.

What do you do under that big tent? We're mutilating children. That's why we have the tent. That's why it's covered. We got to keep the big tent covered because we can't let the anti-Semitism,

the evilness of child mutilation. We got to keep that inside the tent. Keep those tent walls down. That's right. And don't let anything out or in.

It's like when they would put the big tent over the house and then they would fog it for bugs. Yeah. Exactly. That's your big tent. My God.

My God. It's so evil. It's so evil. It is. It's in and he.

Proudly. He thought he won that point. Yeah. You heard the arrogance in his voice. They believe they've won this.

And they believe they're going to win it long term. It's why they're still fighting for it.

They believe if they can convince.

The American public as they've convinced a significant portion of the American public. That their evil perversions are legit. Yeah. That they can convince what they believe are the complete idiots.

“Because that's how they look at the voter.”

They look at the voters who support them as complete morons and idiots. My God. We're getting these people to support child mutilation. Yes. And they're buying it.

Right.

If we can convince them that what can't we convince them of.

Right. We are Red Eye Radio. Coming up more with Gary McNamara. And Eric Harley. It's Red Eye Radio.

We're Red Eye Radio. He's our early non-Gerry McNamara.

“Maybe I should give Jesse Waters a benefit of the doubt though.”

With his conversation with a. I'll tell you yesterday who's running for Senate in Minnesota. Because, you know, you're sitting there. You just don't think something that evil is going to come out of somebody's mouth. Right.

Yeah. And maybe with such a setback that when he talked about the that health care of. Of of long as a parent, the doctor okay with mutilating the child, cast rating the child. Hey, it's no big deal. It's healthcare just like circumcision.

Maybe that just caught Jesse Waters. So off guard because you just don't expect that the person you're talking to is going to promote that kind of evil perversion. Yeah.

“And it would have right then I would have stopped the interview and said,”

I want you to explain to the audience as a doctor. The clear difference between circumcision and full castration. And what the lifetime effect of those two would be. One is minor surgery. The other one is not.

Yeah. And one does not, in fact, affect the the entire genitalia. And it's purpose long term. The other one makes it disappear forever. And it's irreversible.

And if you don't know that, you're not a doctor. Your license should be revoked. This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One. The Dan Bontino Show. Folks, it's not my job to sit here and try to stir you up for clicks. I think I've been very level headed.

I've had to tell people a lot of things they didn't want to hear. So let me tie together into a bullet point story line. This information warfare against your mind is very real. Be careful where you're getting your information. Do not gap this off.

Telling you like this is why I've been so passionate. This stuff is real. Now does it make sense? The Dan Bontino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

Mike Trock, hosted by former Navy SEAL Mike Ridland. What is your take? Was it what you expected? How is the best thing ever?

It was something I always wanted to do.

If you show me a clear goal, I'm like, "Okay, I can do that." Master Chief, he's like, "You realize it's about 1% chance that you're making a 3%. 1%? That's all I need, Master Chief." Michael Tune went home early and I just went up to my chief and I was like, "I'm not doing all." Turns out I'm scared.

That's when we go to work. I was like, "Okay, I can get used to this." My drop, follow and listen on your favorite platform.