[Music]
Now, it's Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, and Eric Hurley talk about everything from
politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Factor Studios. This is Red Eye Radio. All across America, we are runny radio, he is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara.
Hi, we're just getting started. We aren't just getting started. Deep voice guy said that. If you're just getting started, we are just getting started. We are just getting started.
Wow, it's true. Welcome to the last day of August. It is.
This is your last chance to get out there in August the right way, so do it.
I don't know what that means, but you got an extra day to do it. We don't have many months with 31 days actually, we have a, we have several, but get out there and do it. 30 days has September, April, June, and November. All the rest have 31 except for February that only has 28 or 29 days, I remember from
first grade.
“That's the only thing that I got from Grammar School.”
I have a phone with a calendar, that's what I've had with a calculator. I have a, and then if neither of those work, I can, to my car. I've got Android Auto, I just, I just installed a new head unit in my truck and, and upgraded. And I can go, hey Google, how many days are in the month of August, and it will answer me.
I saw that by the way, you just reminded me of the, the flock camera debate that continued
over the weekend. Oh, yes, yes. I mean, I, I started in just to, to just slow, it just was, you know, it was simmering and then kept getting bigger, bigger, bigger, bigger, bigger, bigger and it was interesting because it was, you know, Cam Higbee, I remember Cam Higbee, remember the, the riots in California.
Yeah. He's got that was coming in them all the time. Yeah. Well, he's, he's a, you know, a proponent of, of flock cameras, and he, he posted that, look at it, you know, we had said the other day, look at the Yarrets gets from you.
I mean, the Yarrets. It's like, yeah. Whether information can you get in. He was trying to make the argument, well, look at your cell phone gets from you, and it was pointed out.
He did this on X, and it was pointed out by, you know, the, the, the, the people that read it, what the, the community notes that, yeah, but everything is voluntary on your phone. Yes, you, you can cut it out. But when I saw was the most interesting thing, it was somebody in law enforcement that said
“this and it relates to the story that I told, I think it was last week, and that's, if”
you don't have flock cameras and something happens with the make of car, the police go after, and they don't get a license plate. The police go after everyone that has that make of car, yeah, and it happened to me. It happened to me when there was a hit and run. And all of a sudden one day, I'm, you know, and I wasn't even on that road.
It was like, and just anybody that they had that make of car that they identified, they eventually tracked down. And they, they tracked, you know, they tracked me down and everything was an Irving police officer pulled up to, I don't live in Irving, Texas, and all of a sudden I look, I can see the camera. Uh, you know, I just, uh, was looking at my phone.
I go, what's had somebody in front of my house and police are Irving, Texas. What's an Irving, Texas police officer walking up to my house for, and it was my, it was my make of car that had hit somebody and they were going all around and the, the, the, this person law enforcement on X was saying, we have a choice, you know, either you get the license plate there, or the police eventually come to your house, even if it's not, even if it's
not you who did it, the police are going to come to your house and they're going to ask you, uh, a question. So, uh, one way or another, your privacy is going to get invaded, but it was made. We made the point earlier.
“It is not unconstitutional under current precedent to do what they did, you have to have”
flock cameras. You may think it should be, but under precedent, when you look at the DUI roadblock, as we said, the Supreme Court decision on that, where you had people like Thomas, uh, was Thomas, no, it was, uh, Thomas and one of them, uh, was, was Ford, and then, um, Scalia also said it.
Right. Scalia also said it back then ago, there is, you're out in public, there, there is no privacy on the outside of your vehicle. Right. It does, it just, it doesn't exist.
Right. You may want it. And you can see, as we said, what's going to stop and it's the same thing that stopped, you know,
Red light cameras and that would be public on, we just don't want it.
Well, and, and, you know, um, it's not like the government is putting, uh, a camera outside
“your window of your home, pointing in, and then forcing you to keep the, uh, the blinds open.”
Well, uh, that's Amazon that does that. Well, it's, it's, the, the thing is, is that when you talk about sharing public roads, this is, the, the question is, with the flat cameras, is the potential for abuse, or the abuse that's happened already. That's happened already using it to, you know, uh, follow an X or trace, you know, whatever
I mean, there's been a couple of cases that that really stood out. And then also track behavior and determine without a warrant saying, okay, we've got, we're going to like when they, when they, when they did the, uh, the, uh, the on a safe files. And they rounded up everybody's phone records and it was like, well, they don't, they didn't
hear any conversations.
“They didn't tape any calls that didn't do any of that, but they can determine a pattern”
behavior. Well, uh, John, uh, Whitton saw his therapist, then he went to the pharmacy, or called the pharmacy called his therapist, then he called the pharmacy. And then he called the gun range to book, he called the gun range. We don't know what he did, but he, he called a gun store and then called the gun range.
And all this happened in one afternoon, all right. And then you start setting up this precedent for trying to establish behavior. And, you know, this is one thing that, that we talked about with the Patriot Act. This is very different from the Patriot Act, except the one similarity is, again, the
potential for abuse and, and tracking any given person, my great concern has always been
with AI, not just what the bad guys can do. That's a given, right? The bad guys are always working on however they can get to you. You know, they put fake card swipes at the pump and then get your credit card information and then you don't even recognize that you just, you know, you just use your card at the
pump and they just got every bit of information off it. They're going to clone your card and by the morning, they're going to, you know, they're going to use it. Well, the bigger concern for me, the great concern is other nations, other nations leadership, but our own nation included, and the government deciding they want to start building patterns
of behavior through AI and AI deciding that it's going to break out of its sandbox and that it's job is, you know, we get five years down the road is to use these flat cameras to determine patterns of behavior and then report those patterns of behavior as suspicious. And that's where things really get hairy. That's where things really get concerning.
Even though we've talked for, I don't know, three, four years and it's supposed to be coming out in the next year was the inside cameras in your car, yeah. Looking to see if you're tired or intoxicated that will shut down your vehicle, right? Those are supposed to be as far as we know mandatory for the car is coming up next year. I don't think they've come up with a system though.
But you and I've talked about it for the longest time, other concern, not a belief from the public, nothing. Right. So public not pay attention to any of this until the systems are actually working. Yeah.
“No, that's yes, the answer is yes, that's how they behave because they absolutely”
set it aside until someone gets a ticket or gets or in this case, their car would shut down would not operate. The car would be disabled.
Now we can have a debate about, you know, Louise or Karen, Karen, wow, she's always texting
on her way to work. So she's looking down a lot, her head's going down a lot. That's one of the measurements we're being too tired is your eyes or your head looking downward to actually for truck drivers back in the day, I don't know if the company still exists.
You could get this thing that that basically would hook on your ear like an e...
And then if your head tilted down too often, it would set an alarm off.
Now you had to choose to use that and it didn't report to anything. It just set off a noise to keep you awake. And now truck drivers use our radio program for noise. Yeah, because that's pretty much all it is. But when you look at the fact that the public is furious about cameras outside the vehicle,
but inside the vehicle, nobody says, we're not at great point, nobody has said a word about it. And it's still, as far as we know, on the way. And Congress passed it. Yeah.
Congress passed it. And the Republicans tried to rescind it. The Republicans couldn't get enough vote to rescind cameras inside your car, but outside
the car, the whole nation is going ape manure.
Yes. Yes. I mean, it says. And you know, I find it humor, I find it humor is, and so I have to ask the question, does the public not pay attention to anything?
No, they don't. They can accept. Can you believe that that cornerback on the team that was going to be the fifth cornerback was caught, and they kept the guy is going to be the seventh, and he's in there. And there's his passion and anger and fury.
“And it's like, oh yeah, and it felt the season started, didn't it?”
Yeah. Well, the cuts were all yesterday. I just use that. I mean, because I was going through social media, people are like furious about stuff. And I'm like, my God, the things that matter, people don't care about until it's already
there. And then they go, who did this happen? Because you weren't paying attention. Why do you think? Why do you think that the socialist are grabbing a hold and doing well in the polls?
Because the damn public's going, the what's going on with my favorite sports today? Yeah, until they get, it's a bigger news item that the Buffalo bills in their new stadium have to replace the damn natural turf. Oh, yeah. I went to New York Times.
It was a lead article online. It's grass and a damn football stadium. Yeah. All right, I'm going to calm down a little bit here. Yeah, but that's until people lose something until you take it away, they don't pay
attention. Yeah. You don't pay attention. I mean, there it is. It's been out and you and I've been, it's what, at least three years, at least three years
we've been talking about the cameras inside of vehicle. Right. And we're like, nobody seems to care, Congress, the Republicans can't even, they're going out this, sorry, we can't have that, and they're like, well, you know, there'll be a plenty of information.
We're like, talk about information that could be used to set a pattern that could go at, that could destroy your life based on you being tired and not drunk. Right.
“You know, who knows me, what would be the next thing once they have them in the cars?”
Your car is stopped. Does it inform the police that there's a car on the side of the road? Right. You know, where does it go from, you know, where does it go from that point? You know, and again, my great concern is that you have AI integrated, and when you have
AI integrated, and the government has, well, the government has ownership and AI. Why would the government want ownership and AI?
The first answer you'll get is, well, national defense.
Mm-hmm. Okay. We talked about this. Remember how many conservatives with the NSA phone records were totally on board for it, defending, defending it fully, and when you look at, at ownership in AI and the government giving
its, its rubber stamp, understand national defense is a given. But the other side of that, the side that we don't see until maybe it's too late, how many years did the Obama administration violate people's rights until October of 2016. This was at the end of Obama's second term. The lawyers for the White House, for the administration, go to the FISA courts and say,
we know you told us to go back, and we know this, because John Solomon was part of putting that out back when he was with circa news.
“Was it 2012 that they were told they're 2011 or 2010?”
I don't know how far back it goes. I think it was. I think it was 2011, but it was the Obama administration. Oh, yeah, it was. So when back several years, it was, there's one of those two, 2011 or 2012, which, by the
way, is when Robert Mueller, who was special, a signed special counsel, just months later after that, you know, the following summer in 2017 for the whole Russian hoax, and 2011,
That era, that's when he was the FBI director.
So you look at all this, and they never said no one was held accountable.
No one was, oh, sorry, we haven't followed it for the last three, four, five years. In John Solomon, and at circa news, wrote about that, and brought the documents, of course,
“after the case, it was in March of 2017, I believe, when he was with Circa News, they posted”
the article, and they talked about how they were basically, it was like this, May of Calpa, to the Pfizer Court, to the Pfizer Judge, and we know you're told us to stop years ago, violating people's rights, but we didn't, and we asked the question, what in the world are they talking about specifically, how many times did that happen, how long did that go on, then you look at the Twitter files, my gosh, if we hadn't learned about
the Twitter files, this wasn't just about free speech on the Internet, because Twitter can take whatever they want down, it's their real estate, except for when the government
gets involved, and says we want that speech squashed, and then they basically set up a field
office at the Twitter headquarters, and the FBI is telling not only Twitter, but all social media, what to post and what not to post. These things happen, and then COVID, yes, and then Hillary Clinton and the DNC setting up Trump with Russia collusion with campaign money, which goes back to, you know, 2016. My gosh, you go back to all this year, like we should trust the government with now getting
even more into our lives, right, why, why, we are right, I radio. Hey there, this is Hope with Mother Trucker Yoga, and this is your health tip of the day, powered by house. Let's build stronger, healthier lungs, with a simple breathing exercise you can do right from the driver's seat.
It's called perst lip breathing, here's how to do it, sit tall and relax your shoulders, take a slow, deep breath in through your nose for a count of two. Now purse your lips like you're gently blowing out a candle and exhale slowly for a count of four. Feel your belly pull in as the air leaves your lungs.
Inhale again through your nose for two, exhale through perst lips for four. Keep that rhythm going for a full minute. Try it a few times each day, and breathe a little easier with each mile. Visit MotherTruckerYoga.com and houseproducts.com for more wellness tips for life on the road.
Coming up more with Gary McNamara and Eric Carley, it's Red Eye Radio. We are Red Eye Radio.
“He is a running arm Gary McNamara, so that's what I was wondering over the weekend when”
I saw all the flock camera debates and everything else, and I understand it, I understand the complete debates on it and like anything. We welcome all debate, but it was just that what popped into my mind was the surveillance camera and body sensors that would be required to be in all new cars by 2027.
In fact, I finally found, I just did it now, found an article on one of the latest articles
that was written in late April on it. I'm amazed at this thing hardly has any stories. It's something that you and I have followed for three years, and with the flock camera things, I'm just blown away by how everybody is outraged about cameras outside of your vehicles, but not a peep on cameras inside your vehicles.
Well, the people that are taking 100 selfies a day are really, really peeped about the government taking one picture. We'll get to that coming up. The US soccer podcast. I'm your host Megan Klingabark and after interviewing so many dudes during this men's
world cup, I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. one zash team players.
“I know the U.S. men's national team has changed how I think about myself, how I think”
about being an American, how I think about being on a team.
It's one year out from that world cup, and we're going to talk about the brig...
in U.S. soccer. Are you ready?
“The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel.”
Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
And he's a currently non-garing McNamara coming up in just one minute. People freaking out about flock cameras, cameras outside your vehicles, well, the federal law will require cameras inside of your vehicles for 20-27 coming up in just a minute. When it comes to supplements, two things matter the most, of course you want your supplement to work for you, and you want to know you can trust the brand.
I've been trusting really factor for a while now. They sent me some to try, and I'm going to tell you about my experience. I have been doing that. Let's tell you about in fact Rebecca's experience.
She was hesitant at first, but she discovered how easy really factor makes it to adjust
or cancel any time. Now she says her knee pain is better. She doesn't rely on other pain relievers, and she tells everyone it's absolutely worth it. Thank you Rebecca, and I'll tell you again, they gave me some to try, and it absolutely is first of all, it's drug-free, four key ingredients that work on your body's natural
inflammatory response. And before taking really factor, there were things that were projects and activities that I just sometimes wasn't up to, and now nothing is in my way. Thank you for really factor for everything you've done.
Really factor, in fact we can get you started your three week quick start, just 1776, 17 dollars,
“and 76 cents all you have to do is go to relieffactor.com, or call 800-4 relief.”
Relieffactor.com, or 800-4 relief. So yeah, over the weekend everyone's talking about flock cameras, it just keeps building and building and building, and it was some tremendous discussions on X over the weekend on this, the constitutionality of flock cameras. And as we said, from what we know, from what the precedent is set, and we're talking about
the right, you know, you're talking about Tomis, you're talking about Scalia, the late Justice Scalia, when it came to, you know, DUI, roadblocks and things like that, viewed them as being constitutional, especially Scalia was a part of that one. Tomis was not a part of that decision back in the late 80s, he was part of another
decision.
“I think it was in the 90s that related to that.”
And so we looked at him, we said, looking at the precedent, flock cameras don't seem to be unconstitutional, but neither were read the, the read light cameras. They weren't unconstitutional, people just did want them, they threw a fit about them. And we said, that probably is what's going to stop them. Well, we've been talking about this for at least three years.
Whenever the legislation was considered and passed, Democrats were in power, Republicans have tried to get rid of this and they can't. Yeah, this might be the time if you're going to approach Congress to stop something like this, you use the flock camera to bait and yeah, right. As your ammunition, right, surveillance cameras, Yahoo Autos had this back in April.
Surveillance cameras will be required in all new cars by 2027 federal mandate requires surveillance in all new US cars inside the cars. This is not flock cameras. These are face cameras by 2027, buying a new car in a few years just won't be about horsepower or fuel economy by 2027.
Every new vehicle in the US is expected to come with built-in cameras and sensors that monitor your alertness and in some cases can stop you from driving if the system believes that you are impaired, not necessarily from drugs, but just tired in any way, in any way. This comes from the federal push tied to impaired driving prevention. Instead of waiting for bad decisions, your car steps in before anything happens.
There are infrared cameras that are tracking your eye movement and your head movement and sensors looking for signs of fatigue or intoxication. AI is also used in the mix of evaluating whether you are fit to drive. No form of breathalizer or test is involved here. It's just the car deciding and if the system flags something off like drowsiness or signs
of alcohol impairment, it can prevent the car from starting or limit functionality.
By the way, there are a number of things that set off and I don't know how pr...
the technology will become with each automaker.
There will be standards obviously because this is a mandate, if this is a mandate by the government, then there's going to have to be some minimum standards.
“But what you should know is with similar devices where if it's a commercial vehicle and”
let's say the owner of the company that owns the vehicle, wants to monitor the driver inside the cab of that vehicle, trucks or vans or whatever it might be. And they monitor for alertness or drowsiness. They monitor for, it starts with how often you blink. But also, you could have severe allergies that have you like my eyes, when I got pulled
over this one, we were in the old place in Arlington. I got pulled over in my own neighborhood just a few blocks of my house. Officer goes, "Ben, drink in tonight?" I said, "No, I just woke up and he goes, "Oh, that's why you're eyes are red, that's it." I said, "I've worked nights," I said, "I'm on my way to work." And he gave me a warning.
I wasn't speeding, I don't know what happened. I can't remember.
“I don't know if I didn't use a signal or something in turning.”
I can't remember. I don't know what the primary was, but it was also a Sunday night and it was football season. Well, I don't know if he thought I was coming from someplace, you know, somebody's house, maybe, and I'd been drinking. But there are things that your eyes will do that your head will do when you're tired,
but also in today's world, you're looking around the car. You're looking down at your screen, you're looking at your GPS, your eyes are moving all the time. It should be on the road, but there are many distractions within the modern car. And now we're adding one more, and if they don't get this repealed, we're looking at
27 models here in a couple of months. Now, the 27 models hit lots yet, and I don't think so. I got a double check down. But if the mandate is still in place, if this ever does come to fruition, if it is coming out, if it's still in place, then we're looking at a situation where the technology
is without a doubt, at some level, going to be flawed, certainly in the first couple of years, of implementation. Okay, here we go.
“Consumer reports did something on this in June, all right?”
Now, what they're saying is, there's no kill switch, but then a paragraph later says, there's a kill switch.
The bottom line is a 2027 model car, your cars are not going to have any mandatory
technology that can determine if you're intoxicated, and there's no such thing as a government controlled kill switch. Okay. It said Emily Thomas, nobody is said that by the way. Nobody's making that case.
I don't know. It would have to be built into the car. Now, we've been talking about this. We said three years, we've been talking about this. This was signed into law, the past in the infrastructure bill in 2021.
So we've been talking about this for five years. The whole drug driver acts signed in the law in 2021, does direct federal regulators to require the installation of passive and effective drug driving detection systems in the new vehicles that can prevent or limit vehicle operation if an impairment is detected. So they're saying the technology, listen to what they're right here.
The bottom line is that the 2027 model year cars are not going to have any mandatory
technology that can determine if you're intoxicated, and there's no such thing as a government controlled kill switch. Well, there is. Yeah, if it's a government mandated, if it's a kill switch, it doesn't matter if the car itself is turning it off or if the government has to tell it to turn it off, which by the
way, is not what anybody ever, I don't know anybody ever that argued that. It was the mandate that put this entire technology into the cars, that's where the government comes in. Even though it's almost they're using like a straw argument there. Yeah, however, as of 2026, this is a June, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
has yet to create a standard or issue of final rule for this technology and has told Congress
That there is no commercially available driver, alcohol, impairment detection...
meets the requirement by law and is ready to be installed in cars.
Well, because first of all, if you're an OEM, if you're an engineer at the OEMs, there
is technology.
“They've got breathalysers and stuff that you have to hook up before you know, if you've”
got a history of DUIs or something, and depends on which state you live in, the technology does exist to monitor, but the problem would be accuracy. Well, accuracy and the OEMs also have to do the handshake. They've got to be compliant, but on the other side of it, they've got to sell cars, who in their right mind would buy a car with this technology in it.
Well, Congress can create a lot telling the National Highway Traffic Administration to make
sure cars of a feature by certain date. The feature typically is not required until they actually issue the final rule. We know about that.
“Some cars have already already have direct driver monitoring systems that use infrared”
cameras and head and/or eye tracking technology that require drivers to keep their eyes on the road while active driving assistance, systems are steering, accelerating, and breaking. DDMS is now mandatory in New vehicle sold in Europe, but not yet in the United States,
recent concerns about vehicle privacy, that drivers rightfully concerned about data collection.
So, because we believe driver attention technology can help save lives and be deployed in a privacy protective manner, suggested a broken, direct or privacy and technology policy at consumer reports. Well, no wonder they're using the strong argument, they're for it. Yeah, they're using that strong argument that, you know, because I read this ago, what
are they talking about? We, you know, we've been clear what was in the system and it's been cleared, you know, what the system, you know, what they, the system that they're talking about is created to do. There is no, from what we know, and we, we asked this question, are you going to need a breathalizer? Well, everybody have to blow into it. Otherwise, it won't be accurate.
And if you don't have that, how can you put it in? And would you have a final ruling if you didn't do that? But it would have, it would have infrared cameras that would have had an eye tracking technology. Yeah, and it, it, it would, it's been mandated to shut down the vehicle, if the technology feels, whatever it feels, whatever that degree is, and I don't know what it is. If you don't have a breathalizer in there, you can't be fully
accurate. But I, again, we just brought it up because of the, everyone freaking out over the flock cameras, and nobody even talking about the fact of, well, you want an invasion of privacy. God, inside your car. Yeah, cameras, regular cameras, infrared cameras, eye tracking technology, AI, trying to see if you're too tired, figuring out how many times you're blinking, what your pupils are doing. Well, people are freaking out about cameras looking
at license plates. Well, and, and on top of that, I'm not, I'm not big on convertibles, you know, I like it on a highway. You know, if you're driving through the mountains or something, all right, that's fine. But you're driving down the highway, wind's blowing, you know, and you've got a convertible. And the wind is, you know, obviously doing its job, and you're just, your eyes are, are blinking and blinking and blinking, your head's moving
and everything else. You know, there's a lot of stuff, there's a lot of movements or,
“or behavior that they can get wrong with this kind of technology. I think that's probably”
what the OEMs are, or against, or up against is finding technology that will actually be accurate and do what the mandate says it has to do without getting it wrong. Because if it's, if it has a 1% error, yeah, and it's millions of vehicles that you edit are stopped. Yep. We are right, I radio. Get in touch with what I radio told free at 866, might be right I.
We are right.
they have, they don't have the technology yet. And by the way, the reason you and I were talking
“about this in 2021 is this was supposed to be settled by 2024. It's been extended another three”
years because they can't get the technology of the cameras to be accurate to even get to 99% and let's say it was 99%. How many mistakes, how many people would have their cars
stopped every year? 2 billion trips. Yeah. Right. 2 billion, if it was a 99% effective rate
with the technology in the United States alone. Right. Top of the our news is brought you by how products visit how products.com. This is Ridae Radio on Westwood 1. The U.S. soccer podcast. I'm your host Megan Klingerberg. And after interviewing so many dudes during this men's world cup, I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. 1/2 players.
“I know the U.S. men's national team has changed how I think about myself, how I think about being an”
American, how I think about being on a team. It's one year out from that world cup and we're going
to talk about the brightest prospects in U.S. soccer. Are you ready? I'm ready. Let's do it. The U.S. soccer
podcast presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on your favorite platform. Now, it's Ridae Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day, whether you're up late or you're just starting your day. Welcome to the show from the Relief Fector Studios. This is Ridae Radio. All across America. We are Ridae Radio. He is here, Carly, and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning.
Thank you for being here. If you wonder where I came up with the numbers because we were talking about and it all started with the whole flock camera discussion that's really been just getting hot over the last, which it should. Yeah. You know, stuff like that, you know, the the public should know about it. And it seems like the public had no idea it was going on. Yeah. Like, like, why does a government want to watch geese? No. No. Well, got to make sure that those Canadian geese don't
cross the corner. Don't sue me. Don't cross like America. We're not actually we're building a wall. So they, so again, it's going to be so tall. So tall. But these, no migrating south for Canadian geese anymore. Oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh. Things have become so silly. Okay. But how how I came up getting back to the original topic, how I how I came up with that that number, you know, because when when you're looking at the indoor, because we're talking about the inside the car cameras that the Democrats
passed in the infrastructure bill back in 2021, you and I been talking about it for five years. No, I thought it was probably three. Five. We've been talking about it. It's called the halt drunk driving out. Right. And this would, this would be cameras inside your cameras and sensors inside your vehicle, tracking your eye movement, your body movement, your head movement, anything that would determine whether you are impaired, not necessarily from alcohol or drugs, but just your tired.
“And the, the fact is, and because we keep wondering, there's no, there's no news on this.”
Apparently, there is no proprietary system out there that actually works, right, that they, that they can trust. So not even close to the accuracy that the law intends, but we're right, should be, it should be a hundred percent, but I mean, you know, they're, they're, they're not even close
to the 99, you know, 0.9 percent, nowhere near. Right. And as we said, 99 percent, if it was 99
percent, it would be 2.29 billion a year. Yeah. Mistakes, trips made in a car. Yeah. No, those would be the mistakes. Right. That's not the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, based on the number of trips made in the car. The number of, and I got that number from the number of trips. Triple A foundation for traffic. 229 billion driving trips each year, Americans made. Yeah. So if it was one, if it a 99 percent accuracy rate, 1 percent would be 2 point.
The, well, it would mean that every single person would probably have their car stopped
By an error, not because they were wired.
would, we would have to skew, though, they're skew because not all of those trips are made by brand new cars.
“So we'd only buy a new number of cars. Yes. Good, good, good point. Good new one. Yeah. And yes. Yeah. So,”
and in the case, if the technology were on board, those 27 start hitting lots in September and October of this year. So it would only apply to that year going forward, but whatever that year is. Okay. So let's say we sell the 10 million brand new vehicles would be sold. And average of 2 point
for driving trips a year. So it would be basically, it would be, it would be 10 million if you're
selling 10 million vehicles by 2.4 times 365. 65, right? And unless you're assuming people don't go anywhere on Christmas day. Well, I was, or Labor Day. Okay. Or are they? And so, or the liberal, don't drive today day. Yeah. Right. And then you would have to, you would have to, you would have to,
“you would have to, you would have to walk in front of a few cameras. You would have to multiply that”
times. Yeah. Point. Point zero one. Right. For one percent. Right. Right. So whatever that would be, still be a lot of people. But it's still because the first year would just be 10 million vehicles. Right. I don't know how many we're selling now a year. I don't know, but I do. I don't know.
I don't know. 10 and 13 million, whatever. So over a period of, I got, I'd be going in getting
my 2003 vehicle. Well, you know, now I put in a new transmission. And I know it's got 270,000 miles, but what the heck put in a new motor? Why? I don't want the damn cameras. You know, there are, and they point out in this article from Consumer Reports, the title of the article, by the way,
“is know your car isn't getting a kill switch in 2027. It's by Keith Barry. He's senior auto's”
reporter or was at least as of July 22nd of this year. We believe you said with Consumer Reports, no reason to leave. He's not, but if they, they talk about it, and they also talk about, they bring up the part where he brings up the part in the article. What about the cameras that are already in cars and an effort to prevent distracted driving? Many new vehicles already have a feature DDM as technology. That's distracted driving technology monitoring system.
Distracted driving monitoring system. Basically, technology that alerts a driver to pay attention if it detects that their eyes aren't on the road. Some newer vehicles can automatically slow down or even pull over if a driver is unresponsive. A new manufacturer of DDMS setups say that their existing systems can detect intoxication, and that those features will be built into
several models from Japanese manufacturers. Here's what I would have to go back and ask Keith the author
of this vehicle, or ask the OEM, I guess. Again, Keith Barrier that Consumer Reports, and that is, but how much of that is voluntary? Like I have the attraction control on your car. Me too. Everybody has a button, you can turn that off. I can turn everything off in my vehicle. Like when you're stuck, if they're going to pull you out of a, if you happen to get stuck, you know, in mud or any situation that's where your wheels are going to be like turning,
and they're going to pull you out of that ditch, the people that are rescuing you, though the first thing they'll tell you is turn off your attraction control. And the other technology, the lane avoidance lane departure, rather lane avoidance, turn that on. I don't have to stay on the lane. I've got a lane avoidance. The, the crash mitigation technology, including lane departure warnings, are all voluntary on the later vehicles.
They are, in other words, there's a switch where you can turn them on, turn them off, even to the point of the passenger airbag. So it will, the technology will, and it was funny, because I had this huge heavy box in my passenger seat the other day. And my seat belt thing kept dinging, because I didn't buckle up the Amazon box that was in my car. True story. I was like, are you kidding me? But, but it also detects and says, hey, the airbag is, is, is not on.
You know, if you want to turn it on or it is on, and it will, a light will co...
if someone's, you know, from a family member's writing passenger, I was turned it off and said, good luck. But this is the thing is that that technology is passive technology. It allows you to make a choice as to whether or not you want to participate in it. I don't know if all of this DDMS technology that keep very is referring to in this article, Consumer Reports from July, is, is the distracted driving work and slow down your vehicle. I don't know how much of that
is built in and is, is an option. You, I'm assuming all of it would be, or we'd start hearing more about it in the news, but I could be wrong. What I wonder is if next year or whether the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will go back to Congress and say, you know,
“you've got to put a breathalizer in, in order to be more accurate. And see, that's what I'm saying”
or if. And if they get to that particular point, it's the, yeah, the public will say the public will say, well, it's that one. But the other thing is, when it comes to the accuracy, I have the, you know,
the, the automatic braking system. Yeah. And that's always off in my vehicle. Right. If I'm going,
if I'm going, uh, a, especially on a highway, if I'm going 70 miles an hour and it starts curving, and there's somebody in front of me, but you know, in that curve, it thinks that there's the car in front of me and it hits the brakes. Yes. It's really, it can be very, very dangerous. Yes. When it hits the brakes. Right. Because it's hit the brakes pretty hard. And if someone's right on your tail. Yep. And I'm like, my God, I, you know, I, and it, it, so it shows that it is not yet. Now again, I've got a 2017 vehicle.
“They made it, made it better by now. Right. But that is a flaw. It doesn't happen very often. So I keep it on.”
I'm aware it's going to happen. Right. But somebody new gets behind my car. They don't know it's going to happen.
First time it happened to freak me out or somebody's taking a right turn. And they're way up there.
And that thing will hit hard. And I'm like, I'm not even close. And believe me, I know the distance is supposed to stay back from the current front of you. In fact, on my cruise control, on my radar cruise control, I've got it set at the furthest distance. Right. You're adaptive cruise control. My adaptive cruise control. Right. I have, I have it where it's the furthest distance. Right. Because I want to make sure that, you know, if that, I want to make sure I'm not close to the, I don't, I don't want to be tailgating.
Well, and, and there's, I hate tailgators. In my truck, I have things like that, you, I, you can't turn off. They're not options. And one of them is, if traffic, if the vehicle in front of me slows down, looks like it's coming to a halt. It's got to be right in front of me.
It'll just beat. It starts beeping real fast. Basically saying, you're not slowing down at the
same rate that this vehicle is, you know, and that's happened to only twice when somebody's slam their brakes on their front of me. But that's, you know, those are again, you know,
“those are the questions is, and that's why, and you mentioned, without putting the D, the DUI”
technology on board, which they, which they already have, this is why I mentioned earlier, the OEMs already have the, the technology. I mean, they, I don't think they have any proprietary technology. I don't know any OEM that has proprietary technology. It's all aftermarket, but the technology does exist for a breathalyzer, an on board breathalyzer. Oh yeah, it's already there. Yeah. And it's implemented as a result of somebody getting too many DUIs or, or whatever,
and they have to have that as a, usually during a probation type period. And it's, you know, to me, that would be, I don't know, that should be a wake-up call. And, but beyond that, if you're saying every car, the only way to implement this is to have that technology on board, this discussion is over, because people will not buy those vehicles if they have to go through the breathalyzer. Here's, here's one of the problems with breathalyzer and cash for
clunkers would work. Right. Exactly. But he would want to sell their clunkers. Here's, here's the problem with breathalyzers is that it's only one indicator on, you know, on the, on the, like the, the roadside sobriety test and everything else. Lawyers would jump. I, I would advise. If they do, if they were to do this and put breathalyzers mandate breathalyzers and every new car going forward, I would advise every child considering a degree to get into a law. And then
Become the hammer, become the shark or whatever you're going to call yourself...
in all the major cities and go after they, I don't know who you go after, but go out, get some
“money and some pockets. But those, you know, you, you would start to see this because the backlash”
would be huge. And one of the things that can set off those things, those onboard breathalyzers, this hairspray. Oh, I'm in deep trouble then because I still have my 80s haircut. Well, and on top of that, Karen, not only likes to text while she's driving, but she's getting ready to work. It's pretty dirty. Right. She's, while she's in your series, she's putting hairspray on. You know, this is, keep your knees at eight and four, Karen. But those are the things that, you know,
that you look at and, and, and there's, there's really, I don't see of any other way because I think you could argue. There could be a legal case that comes up and says, sorry,
this doesn't, because the first couple of people, you know, set of people that are pulled over,
they're cars disabled, whatever kills which throws and then, by the way, interferes with their day or a trip to the hospital, interferes with their business, their job because they were late. These, all of these things, if that is the case, then you're going to see a lot of legal cases come
“up and the only way to remedy that would to be in Act A law that includes a breathalizer on board,”
which means everybody would have to breathe into it every time. You know, you brought up the, the headline and consumer reports as I did and it says, you know, there is no kill switch.
There is a kill switch. Right. The kill switch is mandated. Now, it's not a government,
it's not some government bureaucrat monitoring your car and killing the switch. Well, they're not getting my kill switch in 27. So the act, the headline is accurate, but there is a kill switch in the technology that they have so far. There would be a kill switch on board. It's not government enacted. Well, it is government enacted because government is mandated. It's mandated, but it's not like they're monitoring on the floor. Right. Exactly. But they're still
a kill switch. I don't think anybody was sane. Not anybody. They were saying there was a government agent monitoring your car and then they decided to kill your car. Right. The kill switch was the, the data is fed in, whatever the limits are. If you hit that limit, whatever it would be. However, it would look at your eyes or your head. It'll kill your car. That was, you know, it'll not kill it. It'll stop your vehicle. Well, the idea is to make sure that that driver cannot drive.
It's an AI kill switch. Yes. Yeah. That's an easier sell. Yeah. Right. Blaming on an AI. Yeah. It's not an easier sell. We're, we're running for you. This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought you by house products tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920. A moving high pressure dome over the summer has created crop concerns over several parts of the country. U.S. D. A. B. Orologist Brad Ripie notes the movement of the system. A late July through August, southward. Initially, it was across the south
west and the southern Great Plains. Over time, that ridge is shifted eastward and has been more recently parked across the western Gulf Coast region. And even as far east as the Mississippi Delta. So when it comes to southern grown crops over the past month and sublaces longer, like in the southern plains. There have been some notable impacts on cross Lake Sorghum and cotton that have really been hit hard by this late summer dryness and also heat across the
southern United States. This comes after the heat dome caused a mid July stretch of extreme high temperatures that impacted court and soybean growing areas of the northern plains and upper bid west. I'm Rod Bane reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, DC. This report brought to you by Senax Fules and Loops. We'll be right back with more Red Eye Radio with every currently air in Gary McNamara.
We're running every new year and he's our currently and I'm Gary McNamara. We'll keep updating that story for you on the cameras inside of vehicles since the cameras outside of vehicles is
“caused such an uproar. And I think this is going to be a lot like Red Eye cameras.”
I was really surprised how quickly Red Eye cameras came down in the majority of the country.
Yeah, and it had to do with, again, being able to in court and face your accu...
the technology and a lot of that drove the states, but it really just became unpopular.
Mostly because people don't like being late to where they're going to. And prefer to run Red Lights. You know, the thing is, is that show the correlation between the implementation of the technology and a drop in the number of accidents created before that. Remember some municipalities got caught shortening the length of time that the yellow light stayed on. Right. And it became a fundraiser. Yep. Yeah.
The U.S. soccer podcast. I'm your host Megan Klingaburk and after interviewing so many dudes during this men's world cup, I'm so happy to be back with my U.S. one Zash team players.
“I know the U.S. men's national team has changed how I think about myself, how I think about being an”
American, how I think about being on a team. It's one year out from that world cup and we're going to talk about the brightest prospects in U.S. soccer. You ready? It looks good. The U.S. soccer podcast presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.
The show that never stops red. I radio.
And he is there calling. I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning. Well, okay. Apparently now the CBC has reverse course and reporters can call 911 a terrorist attack into that in just a minute. Everyone's talking about weight loss injections because the results are pretty dramatic. They work by lowering blood sugar and reducing appetite. So what if you're looking to lose weight?
“But you're not interested in the weekly injections or those side effects. Well, that's why”
doctors created a weight loss supplement called lean. And the results are remarkable.
The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to lower your blood sugar, burn fat by converting
it into energy. And curb your appetite and cravings. But lean is not for the casual diet or with only a few pounds to lose. The doctors at Brickhouse nutrition created lean for frustrated dieters with ten or more pounds to lose. If that's you, let's get you started right now with 20% off and free rush shipping. So you can add lean to your healthy diet and exercise plan. Very simple. Go to take lean dot com. Take lean dot com and enter the code red eye for your
“discount. Take lean dot com promo code red eye not FDA approved results vary.”
Following an international outcry about a memo advising reporters not to refer to 911 as terrorism CBC the Canadian broadcasting corporation has announced it has revised its editorial guidelines on the matter. You know what they forgot? 13 Canadians died in 911. Oh, there's that. How might have been more not true. I saw the figure and they they lost soldiers. Right after right in the upper. Yes. And and so this was not taken well from many Canadians.
As previously reported by the Jerusalem post on Thursday, the Canadian broadcast team corporation circulated a memo last week to reporters and editors instructing them not to refer to the 911 attacks as terrorist attacks. The memo was authored by the senior director of journalistic standards and public trusted CBC news and sent reporters and editors. CBC spokesperson Kerry Kelly told the posts that the CBC's practice is to exercise extreme caution before using
the words terrorist and terrorism and that the memo was a reminder of the long-standing practice at favors a use of terms with attribution in our reporting. However, on Friday, Chuck Thompson, the head of public affairs at CBC informed the post that CBC news will adjust. It's 911 language guidance in a new editor's blog. The original author of the memo noted that CBC news finds itself once again in a swirl of confusion about how journalists should use the word
terrorist and terrorism this time about the Al Qaeda attacks on New York, Washington and Pennsylvania
On September 11th.
who believe CBC news seeks to minimize or obscure the horror of that day and who was behind it.
“But said that that is the last thing that we want to do. Yeah, right. Right. CBC news says never said”
what happened on September 11th was not terrorism. As some commentators have stated in recent days, yes, it's other people's fault. We have reported fully and accurately on the reasons and motivations for those attacks as determined by police governments and independent commission.
CBC's reporting on terrorism wherever it occurs has always been guided by the principle of
attribution and like other major news organizations. It has been our practice for decades, however, following the fearer. He said that after reviewing the current language guidance, we have decided to adjust it to clarify that direct attribution is not required for describing the historic events of 9/11 as terrorism. There you go. Well, you can't because that's a damn,
“you cannot get a closer damn definition of terrorism than 9/11. It really is, I mean, honestly,”
obvious to everyone, the left is so afraid of hurting someone's feelings. You know, comedians and cars getting coffee, everything goes back to sign-told. Somehow. But the one bill Mar was on. It was one of the last rants in their little car ride after they got coffee, where he was saying, you know, I'm paraphrasing here, but we're walking on eggshells with terrorists. Why aren't we doing that? You know, and we're afraid of hurting their feelings,
basically. You know, and then the left will come back, basically. The left has been saying,
“"Well, well, no, it's just that it hurts an entire community." Well, it's well-known”
by people who aren't ignorant, that it's not the entire community, that it's the terrorist part of that community. It's pretty simple, in fact, that's the whole point when you call it terrorism or label a group of terrorists as terrorists. You are describing their behavior and whether you want to call it radical Islam, terrorist, or whatever it is. But you're describing their behavior, you're describing their or their intent
if they haven't carried out such behavior. And everybody knows this. Yet we're afraid to offend. Well, I took no offense when people call the IRA a terrorist group. All right, I'm Irish. I don't take personal offense to that because you make no claim and not responsible for any terrorist or violence based on that group. Why? I wasn't involved in any of the planning. Right. Or any bombing. So it's a white guy. I don't take any responsibility for
his actions in Oklahoma City. In the couple years before that happened, I used to get calls from that particular town that he was in. When I was a radio talk show, I started in Niagara Falls and Pendleton isn't far away. It's in Niagara County. And I used to get
really radical calls from a few people there. And I always wondered if one of them was in.
Yeah. Yeah. I really didn't save a lot of shows, you know, back then. Right. Like everything what there were no was no podcasting. Right. But I often wondered. I often wondered. Well, because because it was as radical. It was as radical as you can, you know, as you can get. You can make the case. So we can get closer on the Timothy McVey thing. There are things that we have great concerns about when it comes to the government. We were just talking about
flat cameras. Yeah. You and I do not subscribe to any kind of violent behavior when it comes to
Challenging the government or issuing our grievances.
the radicalism is not that you have an opinion on the issue, but you're willing to commit an act of
“terror. What you consider to be the remedy is an act of violence, which is never. Unless you're talking”
about, well, I mean, depending on how far the left goes with with with communism. I mean, I might leave the country. The DSA wins the election in 2008. What's they wound? Well, I don't know. Seems like Republicans are really positive about getting equity, not even in American corporations. Well, we've been now in Venezuela in Oregon. By the way, companies. And we don't
have to worry about it. Interior, Cameron, cars, monitoring your behavior. You won't own a car.
You'll be taking the bus, the government bus. And there's nothing you can do about the
“cameras in the buses. That'll be real people actually monitoring your behavior. No, but it's, you”
look at this and this story is very, you know, it's the left. It's a leftist mentality of not including the entire story. In fact, to their point, which I just made, to their, to their point, those that would say, well, we can't say terrorists. We can't, no, that's, that's actually how you separate them from everybody else, whether it's other Muslims or just any other person on the planet. You described their behavior. Muhammad, Ota in the, the rest of the 19 hijackers on 9/11,
they did the deed. Khalid Sheikh Muhammad planned it. Al-Qaeda behind it. Peter R. Net with CNN
“and a cave in 1999 with Osama bin Laden. We are at war with the United States, which the”
9/11 commission here in the States found. And that was the biggest finding was they were war with us. We weren't at war with them. And that was bipartisan. Right. So when you're saying terrorism or terrorists, you're, you are separating and highlighting them as the bad guys and not lumping them with everybody else. Plus it fits the definition in cyclopediates. Britannica. Here's a definition. Terrorism is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to create
general fear and a population and coercive government or organization into meeting political religious or ideological goals. Yeah, they can also decide from political goals. It can be in order to terrorize a, it can, the actual organic definition can be if you just want to terrorize a community regardless of your goals. Right. To create general fear and the population. Right. That was part of it. Yes. So, so, but that fits the definition exactly of what happened. We're, we're not,
there, there was never, nobody was ever telling CBC. Don't report the truth. Right. But if what
you're saying is, you know, in our, in our journalistic, uh, in our journalistic goals, we want we to report a story accurately, but there are some words that define something specifically that we refuse to use, then that's on you. Yeah. That's on you. You're the one that doesn't want to tell the truth. Right. And you can't argue that CBC can argue that based on the definition, well, they couldn't, I mean, they, they lost the argument. They had a background on it. Right.
But when they made that argument last week, we went through again what the definition of terrorism is. You look at all the different definitions of terrorism and it fits the definition. We just gave you right there. Mm-hmm. So, what you're saying as well, we're not going to use that particular word even if it fits the definition because of something. Right. They still haven't explained it. Right. By the way. Right. We know why. That's very clear why. Yeah. You can't win that with
The victim's families from Canada.
McNamara and Eric Carly, it's Red Eye Radio.
“We're Red Eye Radio. He is here. Carlton, I'm Gary McNamara. Remember last week we were”
talking about Europe and in France where they don't use air conditioning. Yeah. Right. And part of it is, they don't want to be viewed as Americanized. Right. Yeah. But I saw this over the weekend.
The, the best, the funniest expose it made me laugh. It was from the, the, the, the, the,
opposed from the drunk Republican. Go. Yes, it's wasteful. Yes, it's silly. But cranking the AC in
“your car with the windows down on a summer day is peak civilization. And then the response”
from earthbound misfit. You ready? Yeah. Like my mom used to say, you're better use at AC.
There are sweating people in Europe. I love it. Oh, starving kids and other parts of the world
finished your dinner. And there are sweating people in Europe. You get in there and turn that AC on us on the last, the last day of August. And we will be definitely using our air conditioning
“today. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I think I said this last week, but the, the, the weirdest thing is growing”
up in Buffalo and living here now. And when it gets to, because I, I posted the temperatures last week and people said, it's terrible. I said, I actually like the couple of months of the heat that we have mornings and evenings are beautiful. Yeah. I'm just, I mean, I'm lady means like 10 o'clock on weekends, whatever. Right. Right. Jumping the pool at that point and mornings are just absolutely beautiful. And it really, it's, you know, middle of June, a middle of September. And this year,
it's been really July, August. And we'll see how far it goes in September. But the weirdest thing is to have triple digits and the sun is lower in the sky in the end of August and it feels like fall and it's 102 degrees. Yeah. That's weird for somebody who's rubbing a bottle. Yeah. This is Rennie Radio on Westwood One. We'll find out more, as soon as we find out. And in the end, the summer of their lives.
It's a guy at crypto. It was all from guy at the top. That's good. This is Etwas. They feel good to come with you this year. I've been Britain's at Tamba Nur and Kino. Staying. That's when we go to work. I was like, okay, I could get used to this.
