Decoder Ring | How to Make Dollars Make Sense

they're just getting started.

“On the docket, the Justice's Way, whether cops can storm your house without a warrant,”

states can do racial jerrymandering, and if bands on conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors violate free speech, "Oh boy, but don't worry, our podcast strict scrutiny is here to break it all down, with sharp analysis and just the right amount of shade." Two episodes drop every Monday, listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube. A year ago, Brendan Greely saw something on television that couldn't have been more up

his alley. Have you seen this skit? Nate Bragazzi was on Saturday Night Live, and he's playing George Washington. No need, I am fearful, as well. Bargazzi, as George Washington, is crossing the Delaware, like in the famous painting, and

trying to inspire his men.

But we will live through the battle ahead because we fight to control our own destiny. To create our own nation, well taken, and to do our own thing with the English language. He then details the linguistic oddities his soldiers are fighting for, like the freedom

“to call cows and pigs, beef, and pork when they're dead, but for chickens, to always”

just be chicken, and the privilege of having two ways to spell Jeff. What are the two ways to spell Jeff sir? It's the short way with the J and the stupid way with the G. And so one of those lines is he's like, and we will have our own currency. And it will be called the dollar.

The dollar, sir. Yeah. And one of the cast members goes, "General, why will it be called the dollar?" And he says, "No, but he knows." And with that, Brendan's phone lit up, because it isn't true that nobody knows why it's called

the dollar. I got texts from people. They're like, "Wait a minute, I know I got you knows." Brendan's been a finance reporter for 20 years. He covered the Federal Reserve for Bloomberg and the Financial Times, where he still

writes a column. And a couple years ago, an editor suggested to him that there might be a juicy book in a biography of the dollar. Literally, someone said, "Do you want to write a book?" And I was like, "Sure, do.

I'm definitely going to write a book. I can figure this out." And then I started to figure it out. I realized how much I didn't know, and how much I had to learn. All that learning ultimately went into his forthcoming book, the Almighty Dollar, 500 years

of the world's most powerful money.

In the course of writing it, he actually enrolled in a PhD program, an economic history at Princeton, and he discovered that the history of the dollar was so much stranger than he'd realized, so much crazier and more complicated than he known when he was just a finance journalist. Now, like, when I pick up a dollar bill, an actual physical dollar bill, I actually have

these thoughts. I'm like, "God, this is so weird." You weirded the dollar for yourself, basically. I did. I weirded the dollar for myself, and now I am weirding the dollar for everybody else.

You're welcome. This is decoder ring. I'm Willa Pascan. There is nothing more common than money. It's everywhere.

It influences just about everything. It's as close to being the air we breathe as anything that's not actually air. And yet, this can obscure all the complex assumptions baked into it. All the historical forces that make it what it is and make it behave the way that it does. It can obscure just how weird it is, but in this episode, we're going to try and show you.

By drawing your attention to some strange things, we don't really think about even though it feels like we're thinking about money all the time. So today, on decoder ring, two simple sounding questions.

“Why is our money called the dollar and where are those dollars really coming from?”

The Supreme Court opened its new term with a pro-racial profiling wrecking ball, and they're just getting started. On the docket, the justice's way, whether cops can storm your house without a warrant, states can do racial gerrymandering, and if bands on conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors violate free speech, "Oh boy, but don't worry, our podcast strict scrutiny is here to

break it all down with sharp analysis and just the right amount of shade." New episodes drop every Monday, listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube.

the dollar, and Brendan Greely is one of them.

“But like I said, he didn't learn it all the years he spent as a reporter, talking to economists.”

And I tried to do a history of the dollar. I found that the way economists thought about money wasn't useful to me, it wasn't helpful. Listen, not an icon, I mean, it is an icon icon, but like every social science relies on simplifications, on models, on assumptions, and what I found was, for me, the assumptions that are inherent in economics didn't explain how money works.

There are many such assumptions, but let's start with one about how country first creates

its currency. The common idea is they just make it up. So if you were to declare the free state of Pascanlandia tomorrow, our assumption would be, well, in Pascanlandia, we pay each other in Willis. That's the currency.

I gave it a name, this is how it's going to work. If you're being highfalutin, you could call this idea monetary sovereignty, but the concept is not all that different from how it's portrayed in the NAPAR Gatsy sketch about George Washington. In 1776, we declared independence, created a new country and our new country needed a new

currency, and so we made the dollar. That's monetary sovereignty, political independence equals monetary independence. America is an independent country, it declared its political sovereignty in doing so, it automatically

acquired monetary sovereignty, Alexander Hamilton was amazing, he came up with all sorts of

amazing new laws, and we have the dollar, and that's where it went from there.

“That's definitely the story, I don't know, like I'm like, yeah, that's what I think”

happened. Is that what you thought happened? Yes, of course that's what I thought happened, that is not what happened. So what did happen then? Okay, so we have correspondence from Jefferson from Hamilton talking about a monetary system.

And Jefferson at one point says it makes sense to use the money that is already the most familiar. The dollar was in an invention, it was not a creation of the United States, they were adopting something that already existed. So the dollar didn't start with America, instead the dollar began a couple hundred years

before, in the kingdom of Bohemia, the western part of what is now Czechia. In 1512, some people discovered silver in a valley called the Arkhamstall. The Lord at the Arkhamstall, count Stefan Schleck, wanted to keep as much of that silver to himself as he could, but he needed help getting it out of the ground. So we went across the border to Saxony, found mining investors and mining experts and brought

them over, dressed them up like a hunting party so that nobody would know they were actually silver prospecting. And up into the valley, took a look at it and they found the silver and immediately started digging. The silver mine at Arkhamstall was extremely productive, a lot of silver in there.

But count Stefan Schleck was not an entirely above-born character. He was a hawkster, he was a chancer, Schleck didn't actually have title to the mine. Essentially he was digging up tons of precious metal that wasn't necessarily his and smuggling it out of the country to pay his investors and to pay off his debts, without paying taxes to the King of Bohemia.

Just breathtakingly illegal.

“So what happens is, eventually, all the most important and powerful people in Bohemia”

figure out what's going on and they decide, okay, we got to lock this down. So they come up with a deal where they say, okay, you can keep doing this, but King's got to get a cut. No more hustling unknown quantities of metal straight out of the ground and over the border. To keep a honest, Schleck would have to turn all of the silver into coins, minted right

there at Arkhamstall, uniform, pure silver, controllable coins. It was important to make them consistently sized high quality coins because that was literally easier to divide up the shares. Some of those coins would go to pay the King and the rest could be sent back to investors for financing the mine.

Okay, everybody who's an investor in the mine gets 10 big coins, that's your dividend. What size is it? Like what size is it? Oh, it's like a silver dollar. So like, still small silver.

I mean, yeah, but for the time incredibly valuable. These physically small, but incredibly valuable silver coins from Yakhamstall, about twice

the size of a quarter, were first minted in 1520 and they became known as Yakhamstallers.

Yakhamstallers were not intended to be the new local currency, something regular people would use to buy loaves of bread. They were intended for people like investors and noblemen and merchants, but they were unusually reliable, and thus unusually desirable. So desirable, the miners were actually digging the silver out of the ground at Yakhamstall

The miners are actually getting paid in low quality, impure silver.

“Eventually, they revolt three times, literally they strike and then they revolt.”

They like sack the town. And in their demands, they say we want to get paid in the same good silver that's coming out of the ground here, in the same good Yakhamstall coin that the investors are getting. By the end of the 1520s, Yakhamstallers were spreading over much of Northern Europe. What you have is a massive flood of big, pure, consistently sized coins.

It's moving up through silver markets and life-sig, it's moving up and out through the Baltic, it becomes really useful for paying tolls in Denmark and in Sweden. You start to see it be super-useful in Russia, because it was high quality and you could just count it instead of weighing it. And so they began to adopt it as a unit of measure.

So what you're saying to me, what I'm hearing coming, is that sort of like the innovation of the Yakhamstaller is basically that it is consistent and convenient. It's a consistent size, it's a consistent weight, like it is what it says it is. Everybody who touches is like, oh, whether you're in the Baltics, whether you're in Russia, you're like, this is always going to be high quality silver of this size and this

value. And it's the volume, it's the consistency and the volume together. The most important quality of money can have is that it be useful.

The second most important quality that money can have is that there be a lot of it.

As the Yakhamstaller spread around Europe, its name got shortened to simply the taller, turning-lish, the dollar. And pretty soon, other countries in city states began to mint their own versions of it. People start to copy this coin and they start to refer to their copies as their own dollars. You've got principalities all over the Baltic and the low countries going, oh, hey, we've

got it, we've got one of those two. They're just copies. Nobody's telling them they can, they just do it.

“And I think that's the thing often that happens in money.”

We think of money as a command and control thing where the government says you got to use this money and then you do. But far more often what's going on is people are making their own money in ways that are useful to them. That's far more common than this story that we have of new country, new money.

By the mid-1500s, the Yakhamstaller had become the most important coin in the world, spreading

far beyond Europe all the way to Asia. And that didn't happen because a country decreed it as their new currency. It happened by accident, because a minor Bohemian noble got in trouble with the king and was forced to start making very consistent coins, which people all over the world found incredibly useful.

So useful that countries started to adopt and adapt them. Even powerful ones, like the Spanish Empire. And it's thanks to the Spanish Empire, the dollar would spread even further.

“In the 1540s, Spain was in the midst of brutally colonizing vast regions of South America.”

And while doing so, it found enormous silver deposits, particularly in what is now Bolivia. These minds swiftly eclipse European silver output, turning the new world into the hub of global silver production. As Spain is becoming an empire, it figures out the sort of brutal system of exploitation that to get a lot of silver out of the ground very quickly at the mind in Bolivia called

Potosy. What that does is that creates a new flood of silver. So it wasn't just that Spain found silver. It's that they figured out inside of an empire how to produce a lot of silver very quickly. And if the Emperor of Spain wanted this silver to seamlessly become part of global trade,

there was an obvious thing to do with it. When he sold his silver, he had to sell it in the form of a Yakhamstaller. So he takes a pre-existing Iberian coin called a Rial, and then it turns out that if you multiply the Rial times eight, you get something that looks a lot like a Yakhamstaller in ways almost the exact same amount.

So they call this coin the piece of eight, the Rialisau, but any English speaker would have immediately recognized this coin as a dollar. What you are saying is the Emperor of Spain taps into a huge quantity of new silver. It is on the opposite side of the world of Bolivia. Instead of just being like, oh, I have this whole new silver, I'm going to make a whole new

system.

The dollar is already so powerful.

He's like, I have to just take this gushing bunch of silver that I've found somewhere halfway across the world and make it look exactly the same. This is exactly right. Okay, just checking. The Spanish Empire is soon circulating Spanish silver dollars, Rialisau, on an even more

unprecedented scale than ever before. These coins are truly everywhere. There's this huge global system of silver. It's leaving put a sea, it's leaving Zacatecas and Mexico. It's going through Europe, it's going at this point on Galian straight to Manila and to China.

And some of it was entering the economy of the 13 British colonies in America.

The dollar was massively important within the colonies well before the revolution. And that's because the colonists needed those dollars. In Britain declined to enforce its own system of pounds, shillings and pens in its American colonies, or even provide the colonists with enough coins to conduct their daily business. So each colony was forced to cobble together its own monetary system out of basically

IOUs, colony backed currencies like Pennsylvania shillings and whatever foreign coins they could get their hands on. And the coins that were most useful and most likely to show up in North America were Spanish dollars. If you sold anything to the Caribbean, you could get dollars because they were circulating

up from the Spanish territories in Latin America. And in fact, the colonies are competing to bring in dollars. They're desperate for the silver coin and they're fighting each other to attract it.

“So if you've got dollars, if you are literally a pirate of the Caribbean and you need to”

sell them somewhere in the colonies, you have Pennsylvania and New Jersey and New York actively competing to give you more domestic purchasing power in their own colonies for your silver dollar. So this is the status quo when the American Revolution finally happens. And then America throws off the shackles of the British Empire and its monetary system.

But instead of our founding fathers being like, "Hey, let's start a brand new money that's just all ours, they're like, everybody knows the dollar, everybody wants the dollar." Let's just use that. Martin and Jefferson decided to base the new monetary system of a new country on a Spanish coin with a German name.

Again, we joined an existing global dollar system. We did not create the dollar system. Our adoption of the dollar was not an act of sovereignty. It was an act of acquiescence. The dollar pre-existed us.

We didn't create it.

“We just hopped on the dollar train because it was working so well.”

And it wasn't just us, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, those are a reference to us. They're a reference to the Yacom dollar.

Okay, so I found this history of the dollar, like revelatory, I mean, I had never thought

about it to be honest. If I had thought about it, I would have been like, yeah, we made up the dollar when we became a country. Like it definitely would have thought something like that. But I will tell you the truth, which is in your book, it is the thing that fried my

noodle, second most. And there's a thing that really did be in first most. Okay. That's a way to say it. Okay.

And it is, it is so it was like, where does it dollar from? It's where does money come from? Which seems like it should be a simple question, but really did me in. Brendan, where does money come from? The bank just makes the money up.

“See, it's a bit more understandable, why not also give it a try? 90% of the health care industry, that's the best thing you do for your health, you can do it.”

Take your advantage, also take a day with niedrigum or in-dix. In the G yet, the test is a test, the test is tested.

The oil control is extremely powerful, it's more likely to do it in a very simple way.

It's easy to see the oil, it's fast and it's hard to hold it. With the code, it's easy to get 20% of all health care products at shopaboteek.com. Now, it's at 31st Newly. The Supreme Court opened its new term with a pro-racial profiling wrecking ball, and they're just getting started. On the docket, the justice is way, whether cops can storm your house without a warrant.

States can do racial gerrymandering, and if bands on conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors violate free speech. Well, boy, but don't worry, our podcast strict scrutiny is here to break it all down with sharp analysis and just the right amount of shade. New episodes drop every Monday, listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube. So where do you think money comes from? Like who is creating all the dollars that we are exchanging and borrowing and earning and spending and investing every single day?

I want you to take a second, especially if you're not a finance person, to see what you come up with.

To be honest, before working on this episode, I never thought to even wonder about this question.

All I knew about where money comes from is where it doesn't come from. It doesn't grow on trees. When I did finally start thinking about this question though, while working on this piece,

Brendan Greely, veteran finance reporter and author of a new history of the dollar, got a good chuckle out of that.

Because, well, yes, the US mint does manufacture a bunch of coins. They represent only a fraction of the trillions of dollars out there being transacted every day. The slice of the pie that cash takes up is disappeared. You know, we just use physical cash to less and less. So if it's not the mint, then who?

If you know anything about money at all your answers likely to have something to do with another government institution. The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve or the Fed is the Central Bank of the United States. As the Central Bank, it determines our nation's monetary policy. The Fed exerts an extraordinary amount of control and influence over the American economy,

and everyone behaves attention when it changes interest rates. Investors are anxiously awaiting to see if the Federal Reserve will issue another rate cut this afternoon. I don't know if it could affect everything from mortgage rates to the prices of stocks and bonds. And in an introductory e-Con class to say nothing of the news,

“you will be told this important and powerful entity is the one ultimately in charge of creating our dollars.”

It's almost like alchemy. You can create money out of thin air if you're at the Central Bank. As a Fed reporter, Brendan heard this all the time. The Fed creates money. They do it out of thin air.

It's there because the state says it is. But when Brendan got interested in monetary history, he began to realize that story is wrong. When we learn that the Federal Reserve is the origin of money, we have absolutely no way to explain how money worked in the 19th century because there was no Federal Reserve.

It didn't exist. The Federal Reserve was founded in 1913. Obviously, we had money before them. And we got it the same way we get it now. The system we still have today in America is a consequence of the Constitution,

which is money comes from banks. Private, commercial banks make almost all of the dollars that we use on a day to day basis. Banks are a part of most of our lives. Most of us have money in them.

“The money that we use to pay for just about everything.”

And we also know that banks are big and powerful.

When they fail or get into trouble, they can take the entire economy with them. And for all their tremendous known powers, most people do not think of them as straight up creating money. And to really grasp how surprising this was, at least to me,

I need you to understand the typical story about how money gets created. Basically, we need to explain the not quite right, but widely accepted common wisdom about where money comes from in order for you to appreciate what Brendan is saying about banks. And to do that, explaining for us,

and give Brendan a bit of a heat check. I went to someone with a keen interest in money. Well, let's face it, who isn't interested in money. But I'm interested more in the sort of the behind-the-scenes sort of stuff. Mark Blath is a political economist at Brown University,

who teaches a course called the architecture and plumbing of global finance. And it's based on the fact that most people who do study this stuff, read books that take things for granted, like it starts mentioning bonds and bills of exchange and swaps and derivatives. And hardly anybody ever bothers to tell you what this stuff actually is or where it comes from.

And so that's where Mark steps in. To actually bother to explain the stuff we take for granted, like, for instance, where the money that circulates in the economy actually comes from. And Mark started with the aforementioned conventional wisdom about how the Fed makes our money.

If you ever get dragged kicking and screaming into a basic econ class, and they bother to tell you about money, they tell you this story. And it's called fractional dessert banking. This story, the one you hear in Ecan 101,

starts with ordinary people making deposits. People like me. You're the deposit, or will it comes along drops 100 bucks into the bank. The bank says I'll pay you 3% for a year for a whole denied.

“And you're like, what was that better than sticking to a mattress?”

We did do so you gave the bank the money. The bank then finds thousands of other willows of different sizes and collects all of those deposits.

And then says, right, I've now got a million bits of currency.

What am I going to do? I'm going to lend this on to all the people on the other side who want to borrow it. It's 6%. And that 3% difference is the spread that I made my money on. That's the basic model.

This is the, it's a wonderful life model of banking, right? It is exactly right. You're thinking of this place all wrong. Is if I had the money back on a safe, the money is not here. In the classic film, it's a wonderful life.

George Bailey played by Jimmy Stewart, manages a building and loan association, which is not exactly a bank, but close enough for our purposes.

But then there's a run on the bank.

Everyone tries to withdraw their money at the same time, and it's a problem because it's not all there. The building and loan has lent it out just the way market described. Well, your money's in Joe's house. That's right next to yours.

And then the Kennedy house on Mrs. Midland's house on a hundred others. You're lending them the money to build and then they're going to pay it back to you. It's best they can. What are you going to do for our clothes on them? But what George Bailey doesn't explain, because well, nobody asks,

is that his bank isn't just redistributing the deposits. It banks just took in money and lent out exactly what they took in. They'd just be middlemen, but they do more than that. So, banks don't just act as intermediaries. They act if you will as amplifiers.

Here's how it works. Let's say I've deposited a hundred dollars in the bank. The bank doesn't have to keep all that a hundred dollars on hand. It only has to keep a fraction of it in reserve. That fraction can change, but to keep the math easy, let's say 10%.

So, I deposited a hundred dollars, the bank holds on to 10 dollars, and then it can lend out 90 dollars. Say it to our producer, Max. Now, this may sound like it's just moving the money around from one place to another. But it's not.

I still have a hundred dollars. I can go to the bank and get it. But now Max has 90 in his bank account, too. Where there was just a hundred dollars, now there's a hundred and 90. Money has been created in the system.

“And there's one more really important part of this theory.”

The money a bank has in reserve. It doesn't just come from depositors. It also comes from the federal reserve. America's central bank. The central bank decides is a certain amount of what's called

base money. And base money is going to go out into the box. And it gives that to the very big box. And the very big box then take that money in Eagle. All right, let's lend out to the smaller box.

So they lend out to the smaller box. And then the smaller box take that and use that as the reserves.

If the bank gets a million dollars from the central bank to hold in reserve,

they can then loan out say 10 million dollars. That 10 million dollars shows up in other people's accounts. Wala, money has been created. This is the theory of fractional reserve banking. The bank only has to keep a fraction of money in reserve.

And the rest they can lend out, creating more money. So that's the econ 101 version of how money gets made. That's the way people tend to think money is created. But Mark and Brandon are united in saying, is that theory?

It's not actually how almost any of the money we use today comes to be. There's another theory that's much closer to reality. The theory called wait for it in dodgeiness money. Right, okay, what is not? What? No, I know exactly.

No, the basic trick of economics is make things sound much more complex than they are. So you can charge a premium. What's in dodgeiness money? The idea that banks make the money themselves. And it's not really about depositors.

And it's not really about the reserves. Banks are not intermediaries or amplifiers. They just straight up create money. So Martin Willa has a thing for motorcycles. And she wants to buy a motorcycle and it's a ducati.

And it's going to cost her $15,000. So lacking the cash, you go to the bank and say, I'd like to buy a lifeending motorcycle place. And they go, yes, absolutely, there you go. So you put down $3,000 and then they lend you $12,000 to 10%.

Right? Yeah.

“Now, you could imagine a world in which some other Willa funded that loan, right?”

Yeah. But they actually just make it up. They just immediately digitally credit $12,000 to your account. You go to the dealer. The dealer then just basically takes that. And then sends it to another bank as a credit. And you get a more cycle.

Now, that's the creation of money. They've just created $12,000. Like that, nothing, no bar. OK, no, stop. You're saying that when they say, OK, here's $12,000.

They never give me a cash.

But it's like in my account and then I give it to someone else. That they made it up. Yes. Like, do you mean to say they don't-- they have it, right? Don't they have it?

No, they don't need to have it. I mean, they have other things. They've got billions in more bridges. They've got holdings of domestic and foreign bonds. I mean, they have billions in assets.

You're not even a rounding error. But what they do with all of the people like you and actually money in general, this is the general story,

“they just go, all right, is it profitable to give Willa a loan or not?”

And you'll look at your credit history, which is why all those numbers exist. And they decide you're a good credit risk. And they give you the money for the more cycle. And in doing that, they electronically create $12,000 at a thin air. And then they give that to you.

You give it to a bike dealer.

Their bank now has $12,000 in cash. That's how it works.

“In fact, no less than the bank of England has written that 97% of the money”

that we use in the modern world is created in this fashion. It even says this money. All 97% of it is sometimes called fountain pen money, because it's created by the stroke of a banker's pen. Now it's not as if you can do this with no consequences.

If you make bad bets, you can go out of business. If you get too highly levered, right?

You basically have too many loans out there that don't get paid back,

relative to the deposits that you got a problem. But most of the money in circulation that we use in any shape or form has been made up by a bank or similar financial institution. The notion that we fund third year mortgages off of like weekly deposits. It's just not how it happens.

“And the money they give me for the mortgages, I just made up.”

Make it up. I just want to point out here that this theory, the endogenous money theory, is much simpler than the story of fractional reserve banking. We're depositors and the Fed give the banks money, and they hold some of that and reserve,

and then they loan out a bunch more, and that creates more money in the system.

That is a much more complicated mechanism than the banks just marking up new dollars when they make a loan. And yet I struggled with this simpler version. It just seems too simple. That's how money gets made. A commercial bank makes it up.

Shouldn't it be harder? Shouldn't the government be involved? It sounds like magic or make belief. Like poof, money is just a period. But bread and greely actually really hates this way of talking about it. You know, there's this idea right now that you learn. When you take a freshman course in economics, that money is a social convention.

I mean, yeah, sure, but so is your mortgage. When you take out a mortgage, the bank is giving you brand new deposit dollars that it created on the spot. In return for those deposit dollars, it's getting from you a formalized promise to pay them back over time as per the terms of your mortgage. All of these things are explicit financial promises.

And we're much better off thinking about those financial promises, examining them, trying to figure out like why they have meaning, then just waving our hands and saying, look, it's all just a social convention. It works. Don't worry about it. Because that makes the whole thing seem like magic. It's not magic. It's finance.

Like we can understand it. We can have like a normal layperson conversation about why this stuff has a meaning. Like I take your point. It's like these are part of large financial institutions with extensive and complex balance sheets. And it's not like they're just like, they're not like the tooth fairy, right? Like this is how the system actually functions, not make believe. But when I hear like the bank just rates the dollars up, I'm like something about that just

really seems wrong to me. And I suspect that the real knock on a fact of this is this thing that

we all know is true. But this is like a really profound way of seeing it is that how powerful

banks are. Yes, that's exactly right. They're insanely powerful. We've given them this power. And in return, like we need banking regulation to make sure that like they don't periodically blow up because bankers like to take risks, that's great for them. I can really glad that bankers like to take risks. I'm not a banker. I don't like risks. But I'm glad that those people exist in the world. We need them. But they also need to be reigned in with like basic regulation

to make sure that it doesn't endanger everybody's money. And if we don't understand, I think you're exactly right. If we don't understand that the bank just make the money, then we don't feel the same compulsion to make sure that they make it responsibly. We have these kind of patriotic assumptions about our economic system that Alexander Hamilton and the founding father is full of strength and wisdom and fortitude carefully created a financial system for us.

They invented the dollar, which took over the world. Then they're descended sagely created a

“federal reserve and it took on all these powers so we can sleep easy. But the truth is stranger,”

more provisional, historically inflected and weirder than that, as the truth usually is. But you can start to see it if you just take the dollar. The one in your hand, the one in your bank account, and look at it. A new. This is Dakota Ring. I'm Wille Pascan. As ever, please consider signing up for Dakota Ring

that we do. You can join by going to the Dakota Ring Show page on Apple Podcasts or Spotify or visiting slate.com/decoderringplus. I also really want to tell you and encourage you to buy

Brendan Greely's forthcoming book the almighty dollar 500 years of the world's most powerful

“money. It comes out in late May and so you should pre-order it now as a gift to yourself, you will”

not regret it. It contains so much more dense history and fascinating eye-opening information

than we possibly could have shared here. Do it. This episode is written by me and Max Friedman

who also produced it. Dakota Ring is also produced by Katie Shepherd and Evan Chang, our supervising

“producer. Mayor Jacob is senior technical director. I'd like to thank Lizzie Oliary. If you have any”

cultural mysteries you want us to decode, please email us at [email protected] or call us at

347-460-7281. We'll see you in two weeks. [Music] Design is everywhere in our lives. Perhaps most importantly in the places where we've just stopped noticing it. 99% invisible is a weekly exploration of the process and power of design in our contextual. Host Roman Mars asks questions like, "Why do we use the bleep sound to cover up

“inappropriate words on radio and TV?" And why are houseplants having a moment right now?”

And why is the punctuation mark the M-Dash caught up in a fight about AI? 99% invisible will answer all this and more every Tuesday. If you would like to codering, I know you will like 99% invisible a show that I love and that feels like kinda us. We have a lot of the same sensibility and curiosity is so much so that often when we're thinking about a topic here, we actually check to see if 99% invisible has already done it because if they have, we know they have done such a good job,

we just have to back off. But our loss in that instance is absolutely your gain. Follow and listen to 99% invisible wherever you get your podcasts.