6-29-26 Hour 3 - Statistics on Race and Crime

Frisches Obst and Knuckles Gemüse from Aldi.

“Immer gut, immer günstig, immer vielfältig.”

Kurz gesagt, frische für Aldi. Zum Aldi price, diese Woche, mini Wassermilon, das Kilo, für nur 1,29€. Oder nectarinen. Die ein Kilo Schale, für nur 1,80€.

Entdecke jetzt viele weitere Angebote in deiner Aldi-Nord-Filjale. Und weiter geht's, einfach lauschen und genießen. Aldi. Gutis, für Aldi.

[MUSIC PLAYING] Hello, you, love our country. My message is that it's changed for us. It's time to get up, Janet. Get up.

Get up now. Continue this fight.

Hi, yes, fight, fight, fight.

That's one joke. Lunchbook at Joe Biden, of course, being mentally ill, crazy, decrepit, senial old man at a Maryland Democrat rally over the weekend, they're planning on running west more for the president

of the United States, because his melanin levels are good. It's got a good melanin levels. Speaking of which, there was a story.

“I believe I have it in front of me today.”

A story that I didn't see until over the weekend that came out days ago, even-- well, we can have a go, so on the black homicides ride rate in the United States from America. And I say it, I've looked at it before.

I've said, well, the black homicide rate is-- you look at black males in the United States.

Very high homicide rate issue.

If you get local news on your TV, you might be aware of this. 7 to 10 times the homicide rate of white males. But I've got an update, because a new study, new science, the new statistics out on that that I want to share with you.

But that was lunchbook at Joe with the Democrats are all mental, and I want to get back to the Supreme Court, big, big goings on there today, and not good news at the Trump White House. I think probably some unhappiness down in Joyland there.

But let me go to the great legal scholar, John U, who is a long time Republican administration official, and he's also U.C. Berkeley, the University of California, Berkeley, law professor, believe it or not. But John U was on the Fox News channel and Hourigo,

or so, as the less than that when the Supreme Court was breaking all the news, and talking about the decision trying to fire Ms. Cook from the federal reserve board. There had been a previous Supreme Court decision, a recent previous Supreme Court decision,

that did give the president the authority to fire other employees of the federal government on federal commissions and so on. But this was the federal reserve, the Supreme Court today found a special carve out, and said the president can't fire

a member of the federal reserve board without cause, just because, and then he could put somebody new in there on the federal reserve board, who would perhaps favor the president's policies or approach more. But here is the law professor and former Justice

Department of Visual John Hugh on what he was on you, on what he was seeing at the Supreme Court this morning. - Though overall Supreme Court project here has been, how do we bring the administrative state back into the original separation of powers

that our founders created? And the way we're gonna do that is, we're gonna give the president direct control over all the agencies. - That sounds like a good idea,

“and that's what they did in a previous decision.”

But it turns out that the federal reserve board is being treated differently, and for whatever the rationale is, of course, it just happened. I haven't had a chance to read the opinions, the opinion or the dissense.

Here is John Hugh. - The only exception, and I think this will be cook will be a footnote in the end. Slotter is by far the more important case. The federal reserve is just an anomaly,

and then the courts will also scrutinize them, closely to make sure they're acting the best interest of the American people. - Slotter is a previous case, and earlier case, where President Trump, there was Trump v. Slotter,

and this Supreme Court ruled six, three, and so the three liberals, of course, who are communists and not American and didn't go to law school, apparently. Trump v. Slotter uphold the president's firing

of federal trade commission, one of the commissioners, their Rebecca Kelly Slotter, is her name, Rebecca Kelly Slotter, and President Trump fired here from the federal trade commission. This Supreme Court ruled in the six, three decision

with three lefties going with communist China on this one.

another case, Humphrey's ex-secuter, excuse me, ex-ecuter, a 90-year-old president that previously prevented the president

“from removing heads of independent agencies”

without cause, but the Supreme Court, this Supreme Court ruled six, three, that President Trump could fire Slotter, Rebecca Kelly Slotter, from the federal trade commission. So today, they came up with what is effectively an opposite,

the opposite, three conservative justices, were consistent in the slaughter case, and in this case, siding with the presidential authority, the executive authority. But unfortunately, this one got a little tangled,

got a little complicated, and it's wild out there. It's wild out there. But Jeff, let's go back to John U, because he's, again, talking about three decisions thus far today, coming down all of them unfavorable

to President Trump on the Trump White House. - If you were to buy into this trope that the Supreme Court is just an arm of the Trump administration and the Conservatives vote for a block like a block of the decisions today,

only the slaughter case. It means that all the other cases have unusual combinations. In fact, I would say the Trump administration lost the voting case today. They lost the cook case today.

They lost a third case today.

We haven't talked about yet the geo-fensing warrants. We're also struck down by the court and a weird combination of conservatives and liberals. - You know, weird combination of conservative and liberals.

“- And the problem I have with that is I honestly,”

I depend on even Amy Coney, Beretta, and even Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts. I expect them and I depend on them to rule in strict accordance with the Constitution and the law and President and Stary Decises and all that good stuff.

But I don't expect that I'm going to agree with them every time, because I don't live in a fantasy world, but that's me, and I'm not a lawyer, so I don't pretend that I'm familiar with the President and on and on, John, you, on the other hand,

is a very, very bright man and law professor and former senior government official Justice Department. John, you talking about what the court is doing today. - This idea from the left that we got to pack the Supreme Court and undermine its authority because it's so wedded

to the Trump agenda is denied by the results. By the words you see on the page right in front of you, only one of these major cases comes out in a sort of pro-Trump down the line conservative way. - Well, and also what he's saying is maybe more interesting

than John, you all do respect, made it out to be. You can depend on the three Democrat nominees, the lefties, women, probably mentally ill, since about 65% of self-identified, I guess that's white liberal women. I have been diagnosed with mental illness,

but the Democrat nominees, the three on the Supreme Court, I'm pretty sure we'd find mental illness there too, because they're lunatics, but the point that he's making is that the left keeps saying, "Oh, there are six conservatives

on the Supreme Court and they're always going to decide

in favor of conservative things." When in reality, we always expect them to render verdicts that are in accordance with the Constitution and the law and not to just do, and I know that, and I've talked about this before at least a couple of times here,

when decisions come down that I may be unhappy with, I look at what the court has done. They're legal scholars, they're Supreme Court justices, it's their job, it's not my job. And again, you see that Brett Kavanaugh comes down on this side

one time and on that side the next time, because they're not robots, but the three on the left are robots, and they will always reliably, you know how all three of them are going to rule or decide in every case, if you look at where the interests

of the Democrat party are, and you find that the Republican nominees are not reliable votes if you're looking for them

to always come down on the side of the Trump White House,

or Republican White House, or conservative causes, you can expect them generally speaking, even though there's occasionally some disagreement,

“which is fine, that's why we have law schools and all that,”

and we have debates, but the conservatives are unpredictable when it comes to the verdicts coming from the conservative majority, the Democrats, and entirely predictable every single time. And the Democrats, because they're intuitively

and instinctively corrupt, and John U just mentioned, they want to pack the Supreme Court with radical lefty,

because, you know, because that's them,

they're mental, complete mental cases, these guys. All right, and there's plenty more to go to, and I've got, what did I, I teased something earlier that I haven't quite gotten to yet that I want to, I want to get back to because, you know,

“these, these people, can I just tell ya, crazy stuff?”

Oh, yeah, at CNN, this is kind of a funny story. CNN headquarters in New York. The left wing media-ite people put out a funny story over the weekend. CNN talent, fretting about looming merger,

turn execs office into a quote, "cyciatrist's couch." And quote, that's because they're all mentally ill. And that's because they're Democrats living in New York and working for CNN. CNN employees are fretting so badly about a looming merger.

They've reportedly turned to an executive's office into a psychiatrist's couch. The New York Times reported on the heightened anxieties

over CNN as a 111 billion dollar merger

between David Ellison's Paramount Skydance and SNAP then they own CBS. And CNN parent company Warner Brothers, Warner Brothers Discovery, it's called,

“is expected to be finalized in a matter of weeks.”

So David Ellison is a billionaire and he's a very successful person. And he bought Paramount, the movie company in the own CBS on Skydance. And now they're looking at taking over the Warner Brothers

Discovery and the left is furious about this because they have owned all of these networks. The left has activist leftists. Have owned the networks and abused the television news networks for so long that they just assume

that this will go on in perpetuity

uninterrupted until the time of their passing. Now employees have major concerns about a potential takeover of the company. That would include CBS editor-in-chief Barry Weiss, Barry Weiss who is a lifelong journalist

and she's married to a woman. And it's like that the guy being chased through the park in San Francisco over the weekend at the transgender thing. They're not happy that she's a lifelong journalist

a serious journalist. She's now married to a woman.

“I think she used to be married to a man.”

But not anymore. And Barry Weiss being given, she's at CBS and the like, oh, she's ruined CBS, which is completely false, utterly untrue, having grown up on a CBS news family myself.

I think I'd know the difference. And employees at major concerns about a potential takeover of the company would include CBS editor-in-chief Barry Weiss being given an oversight oversight of the network, of CNN, according to the New York Times report,

which sites multiple people familiar with the situation, all anonymous, of course, because, you know, it's better to lie when you're anonymous. Barry Weiss has faced backlash and internal revolts at CBS since Ellison installed her

at the network last year. And is anybody noticed anything terrible happening at CBS? No, no, but the left just assumes ownership of the message of media. It's information dominance that they have secured over time

like an invading army. And they don't want to give up a square foot of that territory. Ellison's cozy relationship with President Donald Trump. Now, should I go on and on about the owners of the New York Times and the Washington Post

and their cozy relationships with every Democrat ever to come down the pike and their families intermarrying. And so, cozy relationship with Donald Trump, his billionaire father Larry Ellison is a major donor. Oh, really?

Again, show we start going down the list of the billionaires and the media owners and the Democrat donations. And George Soros and on and on. It's also raised alarms among staff that CNN could be making a sharp political turn toward the right.

I really, and so now at CNN, oh my god, the Ellison's might take over the parent court of CNN. And they're going to put that awful terrible lesbian, Barry Weiss woman in charge of CNN's editorial production. And that would be the death of CNN.

It might actually breathe life back and the CNN people might start watching CNN just saying, as the merger approaches, the 18th floor of Manhattan Office of Amy and Tellis, the CNN executive and charge of on-air talent, has turned into something

of a psychiatrist coach for anchors and correspondence

to air their anxieties about the looming changes.

Now, again, this is leftists who are so presumptuous as to believe that their free left-wing ride will continue forever without interruption because how dare you? How dare you?

And that's kind of fun. Because we know they're mentally ill.

“There's nothing surprising about any of that, right?”

I got to tell you. And the Democrats boycotting the great American state fair on the mall because of Trump derangement syndrome isn't that great. It's America's 250th anniversary in 10, 9 or 10 states,

not showing up because of Trump derangement syndrome. This party is a sick political party. It genuinely is. Also, California's explode at the homeowner's association because they're demanding that they take down a flag

from their homes at the homeowner's association. Now, is it a Ukraine flag, an LGBT, a trans flag that's coming right up? [MUSIC PLAYING] One of the big things that Democrats are pushing

is legalizing drugs and prostitution is that curly on-family. And a poll, the Pew Research Fox News was talking about it this morning. Pew Research people found 55% of us, Americans,

more than half, 55% are in favor of legal marijuana for medical and recreational use, which means everything. Only 11% say that pot should be illegal, completely. 11% illegal. 33% say it should be legal for medical use only.

But 55% say yes, sure, recreationally, it's more than half. That's changed. All right, Jeff, let's go to the telephones. I want to get to the black homicide rate in a moment, too. Let's go to Danny calling from DC, our nation's capital,

Danny, you're on the Chris Plant Show. Hey, Chris, good morning. I'll start for the noise. I'm out in the middle of my job site. But you were talking earlier about the Democrats

and their continuing support for the transgender females playing female sports and selling and so forth. And I just, for the love of me, just can't figure out why Democrats are having such a hard time distinguishing between male and female, I mean, cockroaches can't.

“Huh, cockroaches can distinguish between male and female?”

Yep, I even have a t-shirt that I just bought online and said, what's the difference between a Democrat

and a cockroach in the answer is, a cockroach

knows the difference between a male and female. That's good. Also, when you turn the lights on, cockroaches run. Yeah. And Democrats, you know, not the Democrats not so much. That's a fun t-shirt and the show.

Even cockroaches know the difference between male and female. Yet the entire Democrat party in 2026 does not know the difference between male and female. And we've got a Supreme Court Justice Danny, who's a woman, who says she doesn't know what a woman is because she's not

a biologist. He doesn't need to be a biologist and know the difference. I wonder if cockroaches have biology classes and they-- because cockroaches have more biologists than the Democrat party. I've got black homicide rates in America coming up.

Thanks, Danny. [MUSIC PLAYING] All right, we're back, and I've made mentioned a couple of times the black homicide rate in the United States of America. Kind of a big deal if we had any black leaders in this country.

They might want to take issue with it, but they don't. There are no black leaders. Maybe Hawk Keem Jeffries, the Gihadi racist communist anti-capitalist anti-American Democrat leader in the House of Representatives. Maybe he should raise an eyebrow, but he won't.

Let me share a couple of things with you here. Sweden, which is a country full of Swedish people.

The homicide rate, you always do it per 100,000 people, right?

“That's how you figure out the rates with crime in Sweden.”

What they call intentional homicide, which is murder. Since at about 1.15 per 100,000, that's pretty good. 1.15 per 100,000, that's very low, very low. And then you'll look at the United States of America. We have significantly higher homicide rate than that, but wait a minute, because the black

homicide victimization rate is consistently higher than that of white Americans in the United States of America.

1 to 1.2 homicides per 100,000 in Sweden. Now among black Americans, it's 26.6 per 100,000. And say some years, it says low as 21.3 per 100,000. Again, in Sweden, it's 1 to 1.2 per 100,000 for black Americans, 21 to 26.6 per 100,000. Pretty amazing. The white homicide rate is between 3.2 per 100,000 and 3.9 per 100,000.

Again, black homicide rates up to 26.6 per 100,000.

“That should be kind of a big deal, I think, that ought to be big.”

And what this says, and this is the number that I've always used before, but I saw an update

over the weekend that I wanted to share with you. The homicide victimization rate for black individuals is roughly 6 to 7 times higher than the rate for white individuals, depending on which reports you're looking at, the Bureau of Justice Statistics at the Department of Justice, they keep the numbers, right? Now that's all great.

Except, there is new reporting on this, and the new reporting is profoundly disturbing. And again, if we had any black leaders, in fact, if we had any white leaders, if we had any leaders in this country, this would be a big deal. And the Democrats abort in most of our major metropolitan areas, about 40% of black babies in the womb, and then, you know, and they grow up, the single parent, more than 70% born

into single parent households, which means it's almost certain you'll be involved with

“the criminal justice system by the time you're a teenager and all that good stuff.”

But listen to this, because this is the Pew Research People. And I've got to say, this came out April 19th of this year, and nobody reported it. I can't find it. I couldn't find it then. I follow the news.

I didn't see this anywhere. Here is the Pew Research People Pew. They're not a biased place. The headline is, in all capital letters, "uncomfortable truth, colon."

Back males, and one of the things I just read, compared black homicide to white homicide,

but didn't separate out males, black males versus white males, which is where you get most of your murders, of course, males. But here's the headline, "uncomfortable truth, colon." Black males, murder at 13 times higher rates than white males do. So you're not here, comparing apples to apples, white males versus black males, presumably

almost entirely adults. And here's the Pew Research Organization with the updated numbers. It's not six or seven times the rate anymore. Now it's 13 times the rate, and it's black males versus white males. I live in Washington, D.C., you know, I get the local news on my television.

I've been watching this for a long time. I got friends. One of my great friends, a career homicide detective in Washington, D.C., I used to go out on jobs with him late at night, but here it is. What's really, what's really driving the massive homicide gap in America between black

males and all other races? For years, the conversation has been simplified to poverty or racism. But the data tells a much more complex story. FBI Uniform Crime Reports consistently show black males committing homicide at rates around 13 times higher than white males, even after adjusting for population size.

This isn't Sherry picked.

“It's raw data from, honestly, from decades of reporting, corroborated by the Centers for”

Disease Control, Mortality States, and Bureau of Justice Statistics figures. That's the FBI, the Justice Department keeping Crime Stats. Quality plays a role, blah, blah, blah, blah, urban black communities face, concentrated, disadvantage, sure, but it doesn't explain the full picture. White populations under similar economic hardships in Appalachia and rural Midwest areas

without matching homicide spikes. Cultural factors, like the glorification of gang life, I think, like Culeo, gangster's paradise. One song, great song, funny album cover, too, but it's true, and the movies. And hey, that's who I can be. When I grew up, I can be a gangster.

I mean, I guess we grew up at James Cagney and Edward G. Robinson movies, but kind of different. They weren't heroes of the story for the most part. So they're going out, yeah, gang life and media and music, single parent households.

per senses, data, and the breakdown in community policing, stack the deck far more decisively.

“Yeah, blah, blah, blah, Pew's trying to build in the Democrat-pretty talking points here,”

because the lead in this report is quite alarming that black males commit homicide in the United States at 13 times, that's 1,300 times the rate of white males, 10 times, I mean, as a 1,000% higher, 13 times the rate of white males, not even including white females, which would give you a lower white homicide rate. Now, we're still not Sweden, but everybody, there's a cousin of everybody else.

And that's, you know, one kind of tribal, wonderful, Swedish, great, beautiful place. And all that, been there repeatedly, and all that, but that is now this ought to be alarming. And if again, if hot came Jeffries were a leader who is black, you don't even have to be a black leader, but he is the Democrat leader of the House of Representatives and the Congress

of the United States of America in Washington, D.C., I've never heard him say a thing about this.

And you got, again, I pointed this out before, because I'm the only one that appears to care

“about it in the entire country, and forget about the media, amazing, amazing stuff.”

The, you know, between the abortion rate, the single parent household rate, the homicide rate. This year, as is the case, pretty much every year, for I don't know how long now, there will be more black males, murdered in the United States, generally by other black males, almost exclusively by other black males, and, and they think that, oh, the cops are killing black males, oh, just shut up, just buy a clue if, if you could.

But we will have more black males murdered in the United States this year, then there were black males that died in the entire Vietnam war between 1959 and 1975. And that's a war in a war zone, in a far off land, fighting communist armies funded by the Soviet Union, the socialists there, you know, they were spreading socialism using AK-47s to do it.

So we will have more black males as we had last year and the year before, murdered in the United States, then there were black males killed in the Vietnam war in the, not per year, but in the entire Vietnam war. And forget about how many black males have been killed since September 11th, in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and beyond, because that number is tiny, minuscule, compared to the

number of black males that would be murdered this year by other black males in the United States. And there's not a Democrat in the country who has said a word about it.

“And I would Jesse Jackson has gone, where is the Reverend Al-Sharlatan on this?”

Jesse Jackson ever talked about this? Well, he mentioned homicide once or twice, but this is pretty crazy stuff. And the, the Pew Research people say, "Dig, deeper," and the stats reveal a stark urban rural divide. Over 90% of black homicides occur in just 2% of US counties, right?

And they're all Democrat cities. These are, this is that the Democrat party is a killing machine. The left is a killing machine and the Democrat party is the left. So 90% of black homicides occur in just 2% of US counties. That's according to the Violence Policy Center and their analysis.

That spots like Chicago, Baltimore, and St. Louis, where illegal guns flow unchecked via straw purchasers, but they're illegal. And they have illegal magazines with too many bullets because they're illegal.

And smuggled from black states, yeah, the Democrats always bling the black states where

they don't have all the murders. I got an idea, stop shooting people. How about that? Legitimate gun ownership? Well, black households, this is kind of a fun step.

I was reading this yesterday. Black households own firearms at rates comparable to white households around 25% to 30% of black households own firearms, legal firearms, as do white households, per the Pew Institute research. Yet defensive gun uses saved countless lives annually with the, they've got this

black who tracks firearms and violence landmark studies estimating 2.5 million incidents yearly

in disproportionately high crime areas. This is people defending themselves with their legal guns 2.5 million times a year. The uncomfortable truth here flips the anti-second amendment script. This armament fantasies, that's the Democrat party, ignore that criminals don't buy guns

I like they built in an ad for the bass pro shops here in the Pew research study.

“Places with strict gun laws like Chicago's endless bands, sea black homicides rates, black”

homicide rates, sore to 50 and more than 50 per 100,000, that is a third world number. You don't find numbers like that in the United States, America, or in Western civilization for that matter. But they ban all guns in Chicago. They blame the cops for all their problems in Chicago, and their homicide rates are, you

know, found in places like Jamaica and Owaga Dugu, and very few of that's in Burkina

Faso, used to be upper volatile, but never mind that 50 plus homicides per 100,000, over

10 times the national average. Sure. While states that have concealed carry like Florida, that slashed urban violence, because you know, they've got people that are allowed to carry guns legally, and that's good

“for law-biting people and bad for criminal people.”

So those numbers are just astonishing, and I wanted to share them with you. This popped up on me yesterday, the day before yesterday, I was reading it yesterday, and I was, I was slack-jogged, because I had long used the previous numbers of seven times as high, black male homicide rates, black homicide rates, ten times as seven times high to ten times as high.

But now, with all the data right here from the government agencies, 13 times higher than white males, the black male murder rate, 13 times higher than white male murder rates.

You're a Democrat party, just amazing.

So, for the Second Amendment community, this is a rallying cry. The real gap is interracial, it's between armed citizens defending their lives, and this armed victims preyed upon by felons wielding illegal blocks.

“And they want to ban salt rifles, who are, you know, used in 0% of homicides, a few, but”

very few, every year. Gun controllers, pedal assault weapons, bands, that which Pew says, that hit zero criminals. Sure. But gut self-defense for the vulnerable, and he's talking about they are talking about black families and household to neighborhoods defending themselves.

Second Amendment advocates must amplify these truths, Pew said, "Sure. Equal rights mean equal protection, and the second amendment is the great equalizer in America's deadliest neighborhoods, ignoring the data, domes, more lives, arming the good guys, arming the good guys, saves them." And this is Pew.

This is not a political organization, this is Pew, it's pretty amazing, pretty amazing stuff.

And again, if you had, you know, a mayor of New York City or Chicago or any place, oh, wait, you do have a black male mayor of Chicago, and got a black governor in Maryland where Baltimore is a loony bin and a black mayor in Baltimore, and you got a black mayor in Washington, B.C., it's a woman, and got another now lunatic Bolshevik coming in as the next mayor of B.C., and it's almost as if the Democrat party doesn't care about human life.

You abort 40% of the black population before they take their first breath, and then you've got a homicide rate that makes war zones look safe, and they are statistically safe compared to Chicago and Baltimore and Washington, D.C. and B.N., all right, let's go to, let's go to a telephone call, Jeff, let's go to John, calling from, I just mentioned, Chicago, Illinois, John, you're on the Chris Plant Show.

John. I saw a video about a year or two ago, young black males, probably eight grade graduation, they're all wearing or caps and gowns, they all pull up their gowns and they all got the lock that the extended magazines, and I turned to my best girl, and I said to her, at the time, there's two ways this is going to end for them, death or jail, there's no future

for that. So the fix to me, and I live just outside of Chicago, the fix is federal law, and out of state law, federal law, five year mandatory prison sentence, if you get caught with a firearm illegally, and I'm concealed carry, and I know the rules and those kids in the city should know the rules, but, you know, how quickly the guns go away, they start putting these kids

in prison for five years. Now, the next part of that story is, once you're in the prison for five years, if they exhibit maybe good behavior and you could rehabilitate them, you put them into some kind

If you bring them into the military, maybe it's straightens out their lives, maybe they

“stay for the 20, it's a future for them, because right now there is no future.”

Yeah. Yeah. You're an Illinois, you have your Illinois concealed carry. That's pretty good. I do.

That takes some doing, huh? Yeah, yeah. Yeah, and I had to go through all the paperwork. Hey, can I make one other point? I've received this discussed anywhere, every single Monday morning, I see my local newspaper,

“the good old old, or actually it's ABC online, 37 shot, five killed in Chicago, right?”

What's the cost of the 37 shot, you know, rehabilitation, brain surgeries, ER cost, hospitals,

what billions of dollars, what's the, I've never seen the number, nobody seems to investigate

that. Well, you're right. If we had a news media, I wonder what they do for a living. I have, I don't know if you're familiar with this, John, you might be. Sound like a smart in the subject, a website called Hay Jackass, you're familiar with

this? Yeah. No. You're not? Oh, you got to check it out.

I just called it up.

“While we're talking, it's all Chicago, and it's all the shootings and all the homicides in Chicago”

and Chicago only. Oh, boy, look what I've done to the clock. This month in June in Chicago, there have been 151 shot and wounded, 151. 40 shot and killed. A total of 191 shot in just in the city of Chicago, just this month, and you said it, John,

every gun illegal, every high capacity magazine illegal, and the Democrats, they fuel more crime and they get more crime, more Democrats, more murder, more Democrats, more crime. John, great stuff, glad you called in, glad you have your concealed carry permit too. Thanks, John.

Wow, there's a new episode of "The New Year" in the third city.

40 out of them are fighter highlights the house of the dragon, and wicked, and is up north-by-euro at the 90th Anniversary Monat, streaming Banacht Nizu, wow. Now, Democrats are a boycotting America's 255th anniversary celebration of the Maul and Democrat Senator Mark Kelly is defending it because he's busy against America. And even this 250th celebration, this is really an opportunity to think about like the history of our country and all the great things we've done, all the innovation, but what's going to happen on July 4th, we're going to have a rally.

We're going to boycott the Trump administration in Washington and not join in in the party because of Trump's arrangement syndrome.