48 Days Until the Midterms: Is a Blue Wave Coming?

Hey friends, Americans living abroad can legally vote in the US election.

“Register or get tailored support at votefromabroad.org.”

Look, state deadlines are super close so don't waste another second.

Go to votefromabroad.org now and click request my ballot. Ask to receive it by email. All I get got to do is fill it out and send it back in. Don't miss this chance to shape the future. Don't delay.

Vote from abroad.org. From New York Times. I'm Mike Obama borrow. This is the daily. With fewer than 50 days until the midterm elections,

a major new poll from the Times suggests that Democrats have a real shot at winning control of both chambers of Congress as an unpopular president insists on making the election all about himself. And yet, serious obstacles remain in the Democrats' way,

including a half billion dollar financial advantage for Republicans.

Today, I talk about all of that with three of my colleagues, National Political Correspondent Shane Goldmoker, White House Reporter, Maggie Haberman, and Chief Political Analyst, Nate Kohn. It's Wednesday, September 16. Hey, everybody.

Hello. Hi. Hello. Maggie, Nate, Shane. Welcome to the first midterm election roundtable

for the general election. We really like to slice the silver on me really thin when it comes to the superlatives for these elections. This is like the assistant to the assistant regional manager. Exactly.

That's what this should do. The first midterm election roundtable for the general. By which, I mean, the primaries are over. Both parties have picked all their nominees, and now in 48 days to be exact,

control of the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate will be determined in hundreds of elections across the country, which is going to be the subject of our conversation today. Nate, I want to begin with you. Please, because as we sit here on Tuesday,

the times just within the past few hours released a major new poll about these midterm elections, top line, what did you all find? Top line, we found Democrats well-positioned to make major gains this fall. They led Republicans by nearly nine points in the race for Congress,

and that's waived territory, which is the kind of election where one party sweeps the other party out of the most competitive states and districts. When's the last time we had a wave election

“with the kind of numbers that this poll found nine points up for Democrats?”

It's almost exactly the same as the Democratic margin from 2018, Trump's first midterm election, and it's larger than other recent wave elections in recent decades, like 1994, 2006 or 2010. 1994, which is a reminder, was the year that Republicans

swept into office. New Gingrich became House Speaker, a huge historical moment for Republicans in 2018, a huge historical victory for Democrats. That's right. Now, how this big national advantage translates into control of the House in the Senate is a little more complicated,

but you would absolutely say that the Democrats are favorite to take the House, and they would have a real chance to take the Senate as well. They have a real uphill climb, but with this kind of national advantage, they would have a serious chance to put the red states they need to play. Okay, Shane and Maggie, please react to this

pretty important new development in the way we think about these midterms. Shane, you go first. I mean, I just sit with this poll for a second, which just has so many bad data points, both for Donald Trump and for the Republican Party.

“We asked a series of questions, which party do you see as more elitist?”

More extreme, more corrupt, all are bad for Republicans. And I think the elitist one is a particularly rough one. This is a term that the Republican Party is used to cast the Democrats' outside the mainstream, and the idea that voters see the Republican Party under Donald Trump right now is more elitist.

Can you translate that while elitist? It's tied into the ballroom potentially. It's tied into the lack of empathy for people's costs concerns. The single worst finding in this poll is cost-of-living issues.

Trump is at the 28% support on the most important issue for most voters.

Like, if you had to pick an issue to be really bad on, don't pick the one people care most about. Yeah. And so this is the challenge that Trump is facing right now, and he seems disconnected from that reality of how voters are perceiving him. This poll, Maggie, am I right to say?

So just the fundamental appeal of this president over the past many years is faded.

Nationally?

Yeah, I don't know that you ever want to say totally with him because obviously he's pretty regenerative,

“and I think we don't always know how everybody is experiencing everything.”

But there's no question that his actions in office, whether it is the ballroom, whether it is the war, there's no question he is dragging his party down. What's interesting, too, to me, about that cost-of-living number the chain was talking about, is number one, it is at least from what I know in my reporting, what Jonathan Swan, our colleague, and I know, is it's reflected in their own polling in the Trump world.

They know it. So despite the fact, well, they certainly do. And it's not as if they're not telling the president, he just often hears what he wants to hear, as anybody who has worked for him will tell you.

But the other piece that is just striking, he's certainly not the first president to misread

his mandate. Joe Biden did that, too, and it cost Joe Biden. This is costing Trump right now. The mandate was not, go take us to war, even though you said you wouldn't, and do a lot of legacy projects for yourself in the form of physical structures. And oh, and PS make a lot of money for yourself and your family, voters can see it. And yet, I submit to this table, despite the president being a clear albatross on his entire party,

just a few days ago, at what was build a midterm convention, perhaps the very first in history, this is what President Trump said. So an election day November 3rd, you got to do me a favor, you got to get out and vote, and you're going to pretend to mind the ballot, because in a way I am on the ballot. He asks Republicans, candidates, voters, to pretend he's on the ballot, intentionally making

this midterm all about him, and then he goes even further. Please raise your right hand. I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States, that loves us so much, he can't even breathe. The president asked this crowd to make a pledge to him, not to the country, not even to the Republican Party, to him. And we are going to vote on November 3rd,

“or we are going to vote before that. And Maggie, what strikes me is, I think it was our colleague Lisa”

Lair, who once said that when a president is this unpopular, they usually find a way to let members

of their own party and Congress distanced themselves from the president. But here is Trump basically

saying, here's a bottle of superglue. I am gluing you all to me. That is the midterm theme. That's genuinely politically counterintuitive. Well, there are some low-prepensity voters who do only turn out to support Trump historically in the three elections that he was on the ballot, and that is who they are going for. That is who his advisors are hoping they can choose turn out among to offset other losses and give in how Trump has behaved about his party.

I don't know how many other choices they have. Now, you can argue that Trump shouldn't have behaved that way, but it's already in the first place. But this is where they are. "Nate is Maggie right that this might be the Republican Party's best strategy under Trump, making it about a president who's deeply unpopular. They don't have many cards to play, fundamentally. They have to try and keep Republican leaning voters on four. When the Democrats

are up, eight and a half points in the jargon, that means that the races that are tied are districts and states that voted for Trump by 10. So, I want to explain that, because I think that math gets tricky for you. Yeah, there are plenty of places in the country where Trump won the presidency by something like 10 points in 2024. That would, under normal circumstances, make you think that place is completely out of Democrats for each. You're saying when Democrats

just generically are up something like 9%, that wipes out that otherwise intimidating lead and makes any district, whether it's in the House or maybe even the Senate, somehow competitive. Exactly. So, if they want to hold down their losses, it is plausible that in a Trump plus 10 district or state trying to rally the Republican base, either by trying to rejuvenate people's personal loyalty to the president or by casting the Democrats as too far

to the left is a relatively reasonable strategy to hold down those worst case losses in red states and districts, and that is especially important in the Senate. For the Democrats to take the Senate, they must win at least two states that Trump won by at least 11 points, which is somewhat conceivable, which is conceivable given this national environment and given that in many of these states, the Democrats have strong candidates. But what that means is that if the Republicans

can just keep their folks on board, they can hold down the worst case scenario here and talking

“about the president may not be the worst way to do that, or at the very least, I can imagine”

it as part of a strategy to do that. Shane, I want to talk more about the Senate map in particular

to possibly winning back the United States Senate and therefore having control of all of Congress,

what does that potential victory look like in November? Right now, the Democrats would have to flip four Senate seats that are currently held by Republicans and hold their three most vulnerable seats. Right now, two states that are generally more battlegrounds main held by Susan Collins and North Carolina, which a Republican is retiring in, these are battleground states that Democrats think they have a pretty good chance and they're favored in the polls to flip

favored in the polls in both those places. In both of those places, and then you get into this trickier territory that Nate has alluded to, which is a series of states that Trump won by 10, 12, 13 percentage points. We're talking about places like Ohio, Alaska, Iowa, Texas, and that is

actually where the main battleground is right now. And so we started the cycle where the Democrats

were dreaming of competing in enough states to even have a chance mathematically at getting a majority. And now that majority is very clearly being fought over and it's being fought over

“in red territory. And for Donald Trump, I think there's an emotional response that every problem”

that the Republican Party faces can be solved with more Donald Trump. But there's not a non-intellectual argument for that, too, which is these are red areas where you actually can win if everybody puts on their partisan red jersey. And for Trump, their operation is like, well, at least we got to get our people out. And we have seen that Donald Trump can get Republican voters out, but whether he can do it when he's not on the ballot, nationally, it's going to be really hard.

And at the same time, he's turned off so many independent voters and Republicans are less enthusiastic

about this election. So the vice is, they're losing independence and their base is depressed. Well, you also just raised an important point, which is that we have been hearing since January from Trump's top advisors that he is about to begin next week. A, you know, he's going to go everywhere. He's going to do a little cool. Yeah, exactly. And that really has not come to pass. And so he has done sporadic events. He has appeared in battleground states here and there, but often these events

are tacked on to other trips that he's doing. And he gives the same speech in every single context. And so he could be doing more. There are a lot of reasons why he's not traveling in general. One of which is that he doesn't want to anymore. And he has made that pretty clear to advisors. He also is visibly an 80 year old man in a way that he was not before. And there are real security risks for him. That's serious. But all of this is to say that he's not

“doing the barn storming that we keep hearing. He is going to do, and certainly that I think”

Republicans feel like he needs to. Right. So friends, I want to bring all this together and ground it in a particular Senate race. And I'm going to suggest we go to Texas because Texas is a place to go to Nates Point earlier that one seemed totally off the map for Democrats. Trump won Texas in 2024. I think by 12, 14 points, not a place that Democrats rightfully have really much of a chance. And yet, right Shane, it's quite competitive between the Democrat James

Teleriko, the Senate nominee, and the Republican Ken Paxton. And I'm wondering how much it has to do with everything this poll has found. I mean, I think for Democrats to win somewhere like Texas, it has to be all of the above. So if Democrats are favored by nine points in the congressional races, well, that's not enough to make up a 14 point gap in Texas before. So you need a good political environment. You need a potentially bad Republican candidate in Ken Paxton, who's been

impeached by his own party, who has enough scandals that even Republicans are frustrated with him. And then you have a Democrat in James Teleriko, who has been from the very beginning trying to run to the middle of the electorate. And so the polls that show him roughly tied or even ahead haven't crushing Ken Paxton among independent voters. And so the entire race for Republicans in Texas and frankly across the country is, can you make James Teleriko out to be a scary

“liberal who you don't want to represent your red area? And that's what you see on television. And”

so the Republicans are going to try to make the race about him. And the Democrats want to make it about your cost of living, your frustrations with the country, your unhappiness with the status quo, and in Texas, you're going to blame Republicans, Trump, and people in your own state. Nate, I know our poll was national, but what did you glean about the Texas Senate race from it? I thought there were two things in the poll that made me want to see the Texas poll afterwards.

Hmm. Why? Oh, anybody, you can help with that. One was the demographics. I mean, Donald Trump is very unpopular and Republicans are doing poorly,

the Democrats are 43 points nationwide. That's not just pre-twined with young and with Latino

“voters. With Latino voters, it was 43 points with young voters, it was almost four.”

Wow. A group that went disproportionately for Trump. A group that was almost voted for Trump in 23, from the Latino vote was a single digit race according to the examples. So this is a huge swing. And there is no state, no plausibly competitive state, at least, where young and Hispanic voters

will do more to help Democrats than Texas. Wow. So that's the first thing. The second things

we did something unusual in this poll, which is that we didn't just ask voters whether they would generically favor the Democrats or Republicans for Congress. But in the states with Senate races, we gave them the actual Senate ballot. Do you support the actual Democratic candidate or the actual Republican candidate in your state? In those races, where the Republicans are trying to defend their seats in the U.S. Senate, the Democrats are fearing even better when you give them the actual

named candidates, including in Texas. So that's even scarier for Republicans, right? Because well, Shane's correct that on its own, a nine point lead on the generic ballot doesn't get you a Democratic victory in a state that voted for Trump by 14 points. If the Democrats have nominated candidates capable of doing even better than that, it's easy to look at this national poll and see how a state like Texas would be highly competitive or even Democratic tilting as many recent

polls suggest. Right. I just want to say, for the record, because I've been hosting this show for 10 years, done a lot of politics. And I've done a lot of episodes where we all get in a room and talk about whether a Democrat could actually win in Texas and it doesn't happen period. It seems like this could actually be the election in which that happens. Maybe. Yes, sure. I will all say yes.

“I think this is the first time where I think if you just take the numbers on its face,”

the Democrat would be as likely or likely to win. Well, I think in a nutshell, this is the story of how Democrats could theoretically take back the Senate. But when we come back in just a moment, we're going to talk about all the ways Democrats could turn out to lose the Senate and be much weaker than perhaps this poll suggest. So we'll do that right after the break. Maggie, can you take us to the break? We'll be right back.

This podcast is supported by vote from abroad. Hey, friends, Americans living abroad can legally vote in the US election. Register or get tailored support at votefromabroad.org.

Look, state deadlines are super close. So don't waste another second. Go to votefromabroad.org

now and click request my ballot. Ask to receive it by email. All you got to do is fill it out

“and send it back in. Don't miss this chance to shape the future. Don't delay. Votefromabroad.org”

I'm Jonathan Knight and I'm the general manager of New York Times Games. If you play our games, you probably know there's something a bit different about them. Just like there are writers behind the articles you read in the Times, there are creators behind our daily puzzles. Tracy Bennett curates the day's world of solution to keep it lively and varied. When a new creates each connections board including all those categories that try to stump you. Sam Azarsky comes

through every last letter word and pangram and spelling bee so that loyal players of all skill levels enjoy it. Our puzzles are human-made every day with the standards you'd expect from the New York Times and this matters because when you choose to spend time with our games, it should be time well spent solving puzzles that are challenging, surprising, and joyful. Puzzles handcrafted for you. We think that's something worth investing in and something worth paying for.

Difficulty of winning a bunch of Senate seats and red states. No small task under any circumstances. Democrats have another set of challenges that I know Shane, you and Maggie have been reporting on a lot and one of them is money. The other may be ideological, the rise of democratic socialists within the Democratic Party, this campaign season. I want to start with money. Shane, can you just remind me what the money situation is for both parties and why it seems to be the bigger challenge

for the Democrats despite the momentum they have? Yeah, I mean when you talk to a democratic strategist probably the number one concern that comes up right now is money that the Republican

Party has more money than the Democratic Party. The RNC alone has $130 million more than the DNC

half a billion dollars financial advantage and we're not done because Elon Musk is going to spend at

“least another $100 million. So you're at $600 million and then those Republican super PACs have”

another $100 million more. So you're talking about could be close to a billion dollars of an advantage for a Republican in these closing weeks and so one of the questions has been would Trump actually spend this money and he has begun to spend this money and notably one of the first places he has spent is in Texas to save that Senate seat and so in one day in the last week something like $50 million of TV ads were booked in Texas by Republicans and there has not been

a national Democratic counter. They're hoping that small donors support Talley Rico but $50 million is a lot of money and that's not just happening in Texas it's happening all over the country. Well before we get to the use of this money in the race like Texas which I do want to come back to do you have a sense Maggie of why the Republican financial advantage is this mighty

“I mean traditionally momentum in a political season translates I'm going to make up a word here”

into money momentum for that same party. So how do we explain this deficit of polling momentum in voter enthusiasm and dollars on the other side? Democrats have been struggling with funders and for quite some time. I don't think that they have ever totally recovered from the very end of the Biden term where a lot of donors were just really really angry. People don't like spending money and finding out didn't get people don't like being told for two years that all is well

and then very visibly through the magic of sight was not and then switching out the candidate sorry hat tip to friends that's a raw scalar line of the magic of sight not mine but that is a big piece of it there were a lot of democratic donors who were just like you know what I don't want to do this now there are also a lot of donors who are less ideological and more business pragmatic quote unquote as they would call themselves they have companies that intersect

with the federal government and they donate to both parties and they have seen little interest in trying to cross the White House you know I could point to Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerberg or people who Democrats have relied on in the past they are seeing that there's much more virtue in giving to the president who's revenge is a given if he's mad at you then necessarily spreading their best as traditionally as they might have across both parties. So all of that has added

to in massive work as the Trump just never took his foot off the gas on he started fundraising

I shouldn't say started he kept up fundraising literally the day after the election and there is so much money sloshing around the system that it becomes its own kind of virtuous cycle of virtuous being you know in quotes but that really is the main reason why and Democrats don't really have a great message against Trump other than we're fundraising message. Right other than we're not Trump. Shane we started to get at this but let's really dig in on how and how

well Republicans are spending this $600 million more than Democrats have and will it in any way blunt the nine-point advantage Democrats have? We don't fully know how they're spending yet because these ad reservations are literally coming in day by day what we're seeing so far is they are trying to shore up vulnerable Republicans mostly and whether these ads in the funding is going to be effective we'll see money makes a huge difference in elections it makes more of a

difference in elections where voters are paying less attention so a house race can be more effective than a Senate race and so it can help especially in this sort of less visible races also when you talk to Democrats the concern isn't this will prevent them from flipping the house it will hold down their margins of how many seats they can compete in. Okay let's turn to what Republicans certainly hope ends up being another big Democratic vulnerability which is

this summer of socialism we've covered a lot on the show the reality the Democrats have elevated many Democratic socialists and their allies to become nominees in the house and in the case of Florida in the U.S. Senate these candidates have won races by as we've discussed putting economic issues like Medicare for all and taxing the rich at the center of these candidacies and Republicans

have responded as they did at the midterm convention by basically saying you're all radicals you're

all socialist you're all communist as President Trump likes to say how is that going Shane as a

“strategy the best thing Republicans can try to do is make this election about the Democrats”

because if people are thinking about Trump and the Republican party swing voters they're losing and so their goal is to scare voters to make them think okay well you might not like this Republican Congressman who votes with Donald Trump 95% of the time but this potential Democrat who

in a nutshell if you just picked at random a house campaign and it's running right now from the right

it's using the word socialists. Give me an example. I mean I'm tickle on. Yeah, I mean the actual person who used to be a Democratic Socialist member is well Lawrence a more left wing Democrat in Michigan and the Republicans are running it and adds again some right now saying he's a Democratic Socialist he's a socialist he's going to bring in all these things that are scary and that you don't like hear in Michigan and so they're running in add against him because he in fact was previously

a member of the Democratic Socialist but it doesn't matter right and now Abdul Alsead even though he's not he's not you know the entire message for the right is don't elect these Democrats they're scary liberals right so in other words Republicans because of the DSA dynamic get to pursue a strategy

“that's not a pitch for why you should vote necessarily for them but why you should not vote for”

the Democrats I'm really curious Nate if the polling that we have done at the times tells us whether

there's actually potency in the general electorate to use a strategy of making the Democrats all socialists well I think that the poll provides plenty of evidence that this is like the best card Republicans can play and it also provides evidence that the successes of progressives and socialists the summer has taken at least some toll on the Democratic Party standing for some number of voters and the poll we asked people whether the Democratic Party is too far to the left 50% of people

said yes that was up from 46% in May so that language too far implies that it's not to they're liking right now the Democrats still had a big lead in the poll so it's possible the Democrats would be a by ten if it weren't for the advances of the socialists and the progressives the

summer but it's not necessarily so great to await that it prevents them from interesting taking advantage

of this environment and it's worth noting that this is a midterm and in general midterms tend to be referendums on the party and power the actions of the president and the governing party loom much more powerfully in the minds of voters than the theoretical things that Democrats might immigration such a great example it was a terrible issue for Democrats during the Biden years because Biden opened the border and no one was concerned at that time at the possibility of the

excesses of what a Trump administration might do now it's flipped around now people are concerned

“about the conduct device and yeah they may remember that the Democrats weren't great at immigration”

but not pull the Democrats have a big lead on immigration that's really interesting and so the Democrats have serious problems but even if the problems were worse than the Republicans voters are going to be more focused on what's going on with the president the theoretical sins of future democratic socialist lawmakers are no match for what voters see as the already committed since president Trump now that said in the races where the Democrats

really have nominated say a democratic socialist or a candidate who's DSA in friends like Abdul al-Sayed there's plenty of historic precedent for the wrong candidate really seriously underperforming even in a wave so it's not out of the question that there could be these isolated races where the Democrats do pay a serious penalty thank you there's one aspect too and I don't want to dwell on this but that we haven't talked about which is that I mean it is not unusual

that you would see a party in power play on fear we have seen that in midterms over and over and over but there is a factor now that I don't know that we can properly account for both in terms of polling and how effective it will be or whether it will bring up backlash but the broad scale Islamophobia is coupled with the DSA message they hear you're really talking about the Michigan Center race I'm not only talking about the Michigan Center race because part of what I mean

yes in terms of the map I am but in terms of the avatar aspect where one party uses a candidate or a person or an official in the opposing party as a stand-in you've seen that was or a non-donny and that came up huge around the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks Mombani who was nine years old when they happened but he happens to be Muslim right but yes it is against El-Sayed in Michigan who it could be the Democratic nominee who it could be

most effective against what used to be a dog whistle is now beyond a bullhorn it is coming from the president on down throughout his party in a way that we just haven't seen before and I don't properly know how to account for that again I don't want to linger on that too much

“but I think we'd be remiss if we didn't mention it in terms of the messaging they're doing”

because it was prominent in the convention I'm really glad you mentioned that Maggie because as you said it could in theory become a sleeper issue for Republicans I want to mention my own curiosity about a different sleeper issue and that is data centers and AI here on the show over the past few days we have done nothing but talk about the sudden crisis in the AI industry its leaders publicly declaring that things are moving too fast they are scared we know

in many districts around the country especially in the house districts where there's a data

that we over time look back and recognize potentially as important after the fact it's certainly possible it's a fast moving issue over just the last two months I feel like this is gone from being almost irrelevant to now being a major topic of national conversation so over the and over

“the next two months I think we have every reason to expect that to continue as of right now”

I don't think our poll offered much reason to think that this is one of the most important issues

why not well maybe the most striking thing to me was how many voters don't even know which party they prefer on the issue so the parties don't have an identity around this yet let me put this way this issue is not yet ripe for partisan politics everyone is sort of deciding where they want to be positioned let alone where they then fit with respect to the parties on that there again I expect this to change and it is changing and there could be individual races where candidates

make this an issue or the local circumstances make it an issue in ways that make us look back on it and say oh and and race that was really big but at a national level right now this is way beneath the classical issues okay you're saying Michael Holderhorses come back to me in a few years when not even outside this we can talk about it in two weeks potentially you know it's really I mean when the poll was began we weren't talking about the safety issues for instance so

Nate I mean one of the things in the poll was we asked you know one of the most important issues to you

in artificial intelligence data centers barely ranked but there's attention between that and what you see the campaigns putting in ads these are an ads all over the country and as you're saying it is scrambled it's not just Democrats running on data centers or against data centers it's Republicans it's Democrats flipping their position and then running tough on data center ads like Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania who had embraced as the biggest investment ever just last year

and then now is running my Republican opponents pro data center I'm anti data center and the reverse in Texas where the governor's anti data center now and he's right so the politics around this all are basically so responsive and we're flashy that it's totally confusing orders are angry and both parties are like trying to figure out a way to take advantage. Maggie I just want to end with this question do you think President Trump has wrapped his head around the very real

possibility that we have established in this conversation that he loses control of not just one branch of Congress but potentially all of Congress has he processed that and does he have a plan

“for that as best you can tell? I believe that he is aware that this is a possibility I think”

that he doesn't think that it's a possibility that impact him the way it can impact the rest of his government most of his advisors will be very candid privately that it will be a disaster it will mean a total slowdown of whatever they're hoping to do in terms of an agenda going forward they know it will mean lots of investigations coming from certainly house Democrats likely Senate Democrats as well stand off over subpoenas. Correct here's the asterisk there. Trump is operating under

a presidential immunity ruling from the Supreme Court that came in 2024 he knows that he is not facing federal criminal prosecution going forward he has said and Jonathan and I have reported this that he is going to pardon any number of people who came within a certain radius of the overlap to protect them from congressional investigation to protect them from anything it is it is a pardon and one thing would be contempt of Congress so I don't think we know what it looks like when an entire government

does not respond to subpoenas we have not seen that before and the only recourse that Congress has is to send contempt of Congress referrals to attorney general and former Trump personal lawyer Tom Blanche so I don't think those are going to go the way of long-term criminal prosecutions

“so it will be a mess but the contours of that mess I think are an open question in either way they”

don't impact Trump directly the way they might others. Right in terms of Trump's own thinking of this again I don't think he looks that far down the road generally speaking he is looking at the projects he wants to get done for himself I realize we keep coming back to that but it's really really true the arc to Trump as it's being called the ballroom so that's the best I can give you. I just wanted to ask a question in that which is like when I'm watching Trump's behavior around

the midterm from afar it seems like he doesn't see this midterm as critical to his legacy doesn't

that his legacy is set and that the legacy is less whether Republicans keep control of the house and Senate anymore if he finishes these projects. The party's legacy in his mind is not his legacy. That is absolutely true. These building projects are tangible and something that people can see and that he anticipates his name won't be taken off of as his name was taken off of buildings in 2016 and after yes you are correct those are his legacy his other legacy is how much money he has made

and how much richer he is going to be and they're not going to be able to take that away from him.

the way the relationship between the White House and the Congress is about to change stepping

“even farther back. I think that with this election and in the final two months of this election”

we are starting to turn a page in American politics. It's going to be a long time until the page turns all the way but we've already talked about some things that are beginning to bubble up that are going to really alter the basic political conflict that we've had in this country for the last 10 years. AI is one example of that and we're also about to have a presidential primary which will begin essentially when this midterm election ends that will not include Donald Trump and that is a

page starting as a page it's starting to be changed and the next page is going to look pretty different when you put all those factors together and we're just now beginning to talk about those issues

“and I don't know what it's going to look like but it's going to be pretty different. Okay well with that”

Nate Maggie Shane thank you for time thanks for having me thank you Michael we'll do a back. This podcast is supported by vote from abroad. Hey friends Americans living abroad can legally vote in the US election register or get tailored

support at vote from abroad.org look state deadlines are super close so don't waste another second

go to vote from abroad.org now and click request my ballot ask to receive it by email I'll get out of do as fill it out and send it back in don't miss this chance to shape the future don't delay vote from abroad.org musicians actors internet celebrities and more we've had bad bunny Olivia Rodrigo and and Hathaway we've also hosted live performances with Andre 3000 in Erica Bado plus we end every conversation

with a snack catch new episodes of popcast every week on YouTube and anywhere you get your podcasts

“here's what else you need to know day on Tuesday President Trump lashed out at the Supreme”

Court for blocking his efforts to restrict voting by mail focusing his iron on the three justices that he appointed to the court Amy Coney Barrett Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch all of whom voted against Trump in the case in a social media post Trump wrote quote these are not the people I interviewed to serve on the US Supreme Court they are merely a shell of their original selves meanwhile in another legal defeat for the president a federal judge has ruled

that the Kennedy Center for performing arts in Washington cannot honor Trump with an inscription on the building's exterior as Trump has repeatedly demanded such an inscription the judge said would require permission from Congress which authorized the Kennedy Center's creation and its original dedication to president Kennedy in 1964 in response to the ruling the Kennedy Center's board voted to shut down the center for two years of renovations while Trump himself

threatened to block the money or acquired for those renovations today's episode was produced by Kilo Keev and Rikina Vetska with help from Diana Winn Lexi Diao and Eric Krupke it was edited by Rachel Kruster contains music by Roni Visto Dan Powell and Marion Lazato and was engineered by Chris Wood our theme music is by one of them that's it for the daily I'm Michael Vard see you tomorrow this podcast is supported by vote from abroad hey friends and fellow students

Americans living abroad can legally vote in the US election you can register or get tailored supported vote from abroad dot org look state deadlines are super close so don't waste another

second go to vote from abroad dot org now and find your state once requested your ballot will

come by email all you got to do is fill it out and send it back in don't miss this chance to shape the future don't delay vote from abroad dot org