The Daily Blast: Trump Rage Erupts Over Iran as Aides Leak Embarrassing Truth: He Lost

I'm your host, Greg Sargent. So the 60-day deadline for Donald Trump and Iran to reach a deal has now expired, and Trump is plainly in a terrible mood over it. In an interview with Fox News, he raged over the straight of Hormuz, claiming that he'll bomb the shit out of the country of Oman, if it's talks with Iran concerning the straight

get in his way. It's not hard to see why Trump is so angry.

In a series of leaks from inside the administration, officials basically admit that Trump has lost

the war. What's really striking about this situation is that Trump seems absolutely convinced that time is on his side, yet the opposite appears true. Literally every day that passes makes this situation worse for him, and he doesn't seem capable of grasping this.

So now what? We're talking about all of it with Ariane Tabatebi, a former defense department official under Joe Biden, who's now at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Ariane, nice to have you on again. Thanks for having me on again.

So the 60 day deadline for Trump and Iran to reach the steel has expired, the straight of Hormuz remains closed, and there are these parallel talks between Iran and Oman about how to reopen the straight.

“Ari, can you just sum up where we are right now with all these moving parts?”

Yeah, we're basically where we've been for quite a few months now, which is to say that

there was this memorandum understanding that was supposed to set the 60 day calendar for the United States and Iran to resolve a number of issues among them, their reopening of the straight of Hormuz, and very importantly, the fate of Iran's nuclear program. The 60 days came and went, and we do not have a resolution on either of those issues, and we do not have a resolution on anything else.

So maybe you can just settle this right now. Trump keeps saying that we're in control of the straight of Hormuz. Well, we have assets in the strip in the area, but Iran is effectively found a way to control the straight of Hormuz when it comes to what vessels are able to pass. It can hold various vessels, commercial, and otherwise at risk.

It can do it from the shore where it has missiles and drones, and it has effectively

“installed this, again, tolling system that I think is not going anywhere anytime soon.”

That is why I think that it's pretty clear that the Iranians have the upper hand on this one. Right. So the short version is that we have blockaded the straight, which means that we can prevent Iran from doing certain types of business, but beyond that Iran controls it in the sense

that it decides who gets out and who doesn't. That's right. OK, so it's in this context that Trump spoke with Fox News correspondent, Tray Yings about the whole situation, listen to what Yings said about that conversation. Now, I asked the President about these parallel talks that are taking place between Iran

and Oman about control of the straight of Hormuz, and the President told Fox News if Oman gets in the way, will bomb the S out of them. We went on to talk about a variety of different regional topics, including the U.S. stockpiles of weapons that are currently stationed in the Middle East. The President says what we've used so far is peanuts.

So let's take this in two pieces. First note that Trump threatened to bomb the shit out of Oman, if it gets in the way of his efforts, as if those efforts are producing such spectacular successes.

“What is it that he doesn't like about Oman's conduct right now?”

Well, look, he's not been particularly specific about what it is. He does not like about Oman's conduct. What he has indicated and what we can kind of get from his statement is that he believes that the Omanys by virtue of being engaged in this diplomatic process with Iran are making it difficult for the United States to win a decisive victory against Iran and to

close out the war.

The reality is that that's not the case, right?

We are not winning the war because of Oman or because there is diplomatic processes going on, by the way, the President, as I indicated earlier, Iran has also sought to engage in said diplomatic processes. So presumably he likes that there is an ability to reach Iran and to have negotiations with them.

But so I think he is just essentially taking Oman and lashing out at them because of the

He's unable to get the victory that he desires and none of that has anything to do with

Oman. It has to do with the poor planning that has happened in the lead up to the war and the fact that we do not have any clear objectives when it comes to the war.

“This is very simple, I think, from Trump's point of view, this can't be his failure.”

So it's got to be someone else's failure and so it must be Oman's today and it'll be someone else's tomorrow. Is that the size of it? I think that's pretty much, that's pretty accurate.

Okay, well, there's the second piece of that exchange that this Fox correspondent had

with Trump. What do you make of that? Where Trump says we've only used peanuts in terms of weaponry in this war? Well, that is just not accurate. We have spent billions of dollars in this war and this is not me uphining.

This is according to Trump's own officials at the Pentagon. In there is the fact that there are all the costs that are not where you can put a dollar amount to it and that includes things like military readiness. Moral among our service members just this past week, we've had multiple stories about service members who have been on very long deployments where they're missing things like

prescription for their contacts, where they're running out of sanitary supplies and Moral is low and there have been incidents of sailors trying to take their lives or just kind of harm themselves because they are just tired, exhausted, frustrated.

“And that is a cost that is not, that's not peanuts, right?”

Those are real costs that are obviously on a human level just extremely disheartening to hear about, but on a military level, they hurt readiness, these are the kinds of things that hurt our ability to recruit into the services that make it more difficult for us to retain people in the service because why would you sign up to continue serving when you know that this is the kind of future that might await you?

And down the line, it's something that just overall hurts our ability to compete, to deter adversaries and to win wars when we need to fight them for real, not in the case of, you know, the Ron War, what we just choose to go blow up some things because we seem to be bored. Politico's Nahal, too, she had some very good reporting on all this and which she says, we're facing a new kind of quagmire here that is unfathomable for a lot of people.

She talked to people inside the administration and the responses she got back were really interesting as she put it one of the first responses she gets when she asks current and former officials what has to be done to win is like a primal scream and it translates into something like

this quote, "we never should have started this war" or quote, "what do you mean by win?"

And then one official says to her, quote, "I don't see a way out of this" and then this official says that the Trump team fundamentally misunderstands Iran's rulers in the sense that Trump and his aids have, quote, "always felt like they can just keep applying pain and Iran will crumble, but the regime is not going to crumble." That is quite a portion. These officials are basically leaking word that it's understood inside the administration that they've lost.

“Yes, so much to say about this. I think that it's been obvious to anyone who's had eyes and ears”

and has sort of read the news every now and again that we have not won this war, that much is abundantly clear. The fact that folks inside the administration are now starting to recognize it or perhaps have recognized it for a while or just starting to admit it, I think is pretty significant. The thing that was striking to me from this good piece was the point about, you know, the administration doesn't understand Iran's leaders. And I want to be very clear that that's

not because we don't have the capability to understand Iran's leaders. It's because you've had an administration that for a year and a half has waged a war of attrition against the civil service against an intelligence community. Has sideline anyone who had any real expertise in these areas, even as they have been, you know, very active in these policy spaces. You've had doge, you have people who've been rift, you have Laura Lumer determining personnel policy. You know, it's

it's shocking but not surprising that all of this is happening and we're hearing about it the same week as my colleague Julia Curley writes an essay in the Atlantic talking about being pushed out of government for being trans. So, you know, and they found all kinds of excuses to push out people.

people who could help them understand Iran's leaders. If you're enjoying this episode and want to

“get even more out of the DSR network, you need to check out our sub-stack. The DSR network”

sub-stack is the absolute best way to follow deep state radio. The DSR daily, where it's matter, need to know sila consciousness, AI, energy and climate and the daily blast. Sign up to get notified every time a new episode drops and stay up to date on the latest news and expert analysis. Right now, we're offering 20% off of a DSR network membership. Payed members get an ad free listening experience, select episodes two days early, 50% off of David's need to know sub-stack and more.

To get your 20% off, go to DSR network.substack.com/August26. That's DSR network.substack.com/August26. I think there's a through line that connects the story you're talking about here, which is the complete gutting of the civil service and diplomatic core and all that. With the other stuff involving Trump's constant threats of force and it's this, it's that Trump doesn't think he needs to understand Iran's rulers. He doesn't think he needs a diplomatic

core to tell him how Iran's rulers and how Iran understands the world. He can just use force

and because he's infinitely strong and powerful, he will always get his way by definition.

“So why bother understanding anybody, isn't that sort of the story here?”

Yeah, and it's not just about adversaries, right? I mean, I think you're exactly right, that he thinks that he can pick up the phone. I mean, just this week too, we had the story about how he's talked to Kim Jong-un or he thinks that he has a good relationship with Kim Jong-un. So we can just now do the joint exercises, we typically do one of our closest allies, South Korea. So yeah, so he thinks that he can talk to people and then he gets them and then he can just

make policy on his own. But it's not just about adversaries. It's also about the fact that he doesn't understand as we would say under the Department of Defense blue, right? The the U.S. side of things. He thinks about readiness as something that can be replenished, right? It's a video game. You go in. You fight a bunch of bosses and then you can just press this button and you get your health back. You get your weapons back. Everything gets replenished and you can continue your

“quest. And that's just not how the military works in the real world. You need to have maintenance.”

You need to have exercises and training. You need to, you know, you have the moral things that we've been talking about. And so there is just this fundamental, I think, misunderstanding and lack of interest in understanding, trade-offs, understanding, you know, the pros and cons of different courses of action and then making decisions based on what you have in your toolkit instead of what you wish you had in your toolkit. And, you know, again, the unfortunate thing going back to the

courses that we're all paying at. Well, I will tell you, when I was a kid, you needed to have quarters to play video games. And so he's kind of like the kid with an infinite number of quarters being a rich kid. Yeah, I guess that, yep, that's true. All right. So just as an aside here, Trump lost his temper on another front. He lost his temper with the reporters while facing hard questions about foreign policy. At one point, he started rebuking one of the journalists telling

her to be quiet, listen to this. Quiet, who are you with? Fake news. Fake news. You're allowed. You're allowed, boisterous person. You're fake news. Be quiet. Be quiet. Be quiet. Be quiet. You're a fake reporter and you report fake news. Go ahead. Is there a food on the USS Lincoln? Yeah, it is. That was a, that was a CNN fake report. So note at the end, there a second reporter brings up the USS Lincoln, which has been in the

news because of terrible conditions on it. Trump calls it just another fake report. So there's

the source of his anger for you right there. I mean, Trump threatens to incinerate 91 million

people, meaning the whole population of Iran threatens to wipe out their civilization. That doesn't force Iran to do is bidding, even though he's had like a total triumph over them or whatever, but he can well, you know, he can viciously abuse female reporters whenever he wants to. It's kind of like that's mega consolation prize or something. What did you make of all that? Yeah, again, I think, you know, when you start to kind of lash out at people and and say the kind of

things that he's saying, it's because you don't have a good argument. Right. If you have a strong argument and you're sure of your argument, you don't need to be telling people to be quiet and to sit down and that they're fake news. You do those things. What you have nothing of substance to say. And, you know, more than six months into this war, it's clear that that's exactly where we are.

They just don't have an off-ramp and they have put themselves in the situation where they're stuck

“in it politically, strategically and policy-wise. Instead of trying to figure out how to get out of it,”

they're just telling everyone that, you know, what they're seeing is not correct to not to believe the evidence of their own eyes at years. Just to wrap this up, he keeps saying that time is on his side, but it's really not on his side in the sense that every passing day without a deal, the midterms come closer and I've got to think Iran is paying attention to our political clock. Can you talk about the way Iran views our political clock, the way Iran views Trump's long-term

vulnerability and the way they're thinking about it? Right and this is not unique to Trump.

Right adversaries always know that we have a political clock and often adversaries in authoritarian

systems can wait out said political clock. And that's the case for Iran. We are just a few months away from the elections, the picture that is emerging is not a good one for this administration and for the president and for the allies. And so Iran can just kind of hang out and wait, look, they have a really terrible economy and on that point, Trump is right. Which means that at some point, they need to think about how they're going to do things differently. But they have a bit of time

“here number one. Number two, I think that actually there is a benefit that they get out of being”

in this situation of war and by day I mean purely the regime, not obviously the people who are stuck in this situation and it's really awful from the perspective of just, you know, the human cost of this conflict for the Iranian people. But the regime is watching this and thinking to itself as far as as long as this work continues, it doesn't have to provide real solutions to people's problems. They don't have to deal with the economic challenges that were creating the protests,

the mass protests that we saw just a few months ago. The second the shooting stops, the second

they have a ceasefire or some sort of agreement with the United States, they will need to govern. And this is not a regime that is particularly equipped to do it. They weren't equipped to do it before this work killed off half of their leadership who were actually experienced and installed instead of it a bunch of people who don't actually know what they're doing in senior positions. So I think they can wait this out a bit longer and by the way, they have no choice because

“from the perspective of this regime, this is a war of survival. And when you have to survive,”

you do anything you can to do that. It is not a war that they just chose to do on the side on the way to Cuba. So this is this is very different for them than it is for the United States. And unfortunately, again, that means that I think we're stuck in the current space. We're doing this thing where we're negotiating sometimes, but shooting other days. And we have these threats on and off with, again, the people of Iran, the people of the broader region stuck in the middle

of all of this, as well as our service members who are stuck in the middle of all of this. So does Iran have enough time to last through the midterms and beyond? And do you think they're going to do that? You think they'll hold out through the midterms? I think so. I think they can. And I think that they have seen that they have an administration that is ultimately going to fold, right? The administration

folded a few months ago with the memorandum of understanding front loading a bunch of sanctions relief to Iran telling Iran, you know, yeah, we'll withdraw from the bases around your country giving Iran things that no other administration would give them. And so they know that if they just waited out that they will probably get more concessions from this administration at best. And at worst, it's just their continuing things as they are. They've already paid the

price of it. It's not like there is that, you know, they have really paid the price already. So it's a son cost at this point for them. You know, the crowning irony to all this is that Trump doesn't think he needs to understand his adversary, but Iran has really taken a lot of steps to understand theirs. Awesome to talk to you. Thank you so much for all that.

Always good to be with you. Thanks so much. You've been listening to The Daily Blast with me,

your host Greg Sargent. The Daily Blast is a new republic podcast and is produced by Riley Fessler on the DSR network.