To stay up to date on all the news that you need to know, there's no better p...
right here on the DSR network.
βAnd there's no better way to enjoy the DSR network than by becoming a member.β
Members enjoying ad-free listening experience, access to our discord community, exclusive content, early episode access, and more. Choose code at DSR 26 for a 25% off discount on sign up at the DSR network.com. That's code at DSR 26 at the DSR network.com/buy. Thank you and enjoy the show.
This is Deep State Radio, coming to you direct from our super secret studio in the third
sub-basement of the Ministry of Snark in Washington, D.C. and from other undisclosed locations across America and around the world. Hello and welcome to DSR's words matter. I'm David Rothkoff, join this week as every week, by the man who can tell us everything we need to know about why RFK Jr cut the penis off of a raccoon, norm or instinct, norm.
Why do you do it?
βMy first question David was, was the raccoon alive at the time?β
No, I'm a friend. I'm a friend according to the story the raccoon was dead.
Okay, because he's fully capable of doing it with a live raccoon, I know.
I wish I had a good answer for that, but there are so many things about RFK Jr about which I do not have a good answer. My tentative answer is he had just sniffed a ton of cocaine off the toilet and somehow thought from that adult, speed driven mind that this was a good thing to do to study. Yeah, I didn't even want to say that he doesn't feel like he has germs because he's sniffed.
He's not susceptible to germs, because it's sniffed cocaine off the toilet. And this particular case, by the way, he was driving his car reportedly, his van, full of his kids. Can you just imagine you're driving along, you say, hey, kids, there's a dead raccoon.
He's going to cut the penis off and then we'll keep it.
What do you think? Fun? If only somebody had called child protective services at an earlier point.
βAnd no kidding, like way earlier, but it does make you think, right?β
Over the weekend, Donald Trump, who last week, said he was going to erase a 7,000-year-old civilization from the Earth, over the weekend, he attacked the Pope and then sent him out a picture of himself as Jesus. Then his vice president started to lecture the Pope and said that the Pope needs to think about theology a little more.
And by the way, this is his vice president who's been a Catholic for three years. You've got a RFK junior, and you've got Steven Miller who looks like he eats bugs, and yet Christy Known, who shot her dog, and you've got the labor secretary, and apparently he's doing all sorts of weird, unspeakable shit with her labor department. And you've got, and, and, and, and, you know, they're all crazy norm.
And then I turned on the news, where I read the New York Times, and it's like, well, Donald Trump's strategy, and Iran, and it's like, they're crazy. It's the... So, have a strategy. It's chess, right?
As we have said many times, the way Donald Trump plays chess is he eats the pieces off the board. Uh, well, then we have two other stories to follow up on that David. One is that after doing this with Jesus, and saying, no, I didn't know what was Jesus, I thought it was a doctor, and I will say my response to that because it had the picture
of him with a glowing light in his hand, and I said, apparently, that's his proctoscope. But he then went ahead and put up another picture of him, uh, arm and arm with Jesus. Uh, so... Yeah. I didn't say...
I didn't say it was Jesus. Jesus is my close person, Fred.
Yes.
And I would have pardoned him for a sins.
Yeah. Well, he only would have pardoned him if Jesus had attacked the Capitol, or been a white collar fraudster, because that's... He's got this whole thing now, like yesterday, they're going, and the Justice Department is moving to wipe clean the records of all these people of violently attacked the Capitol.
You know, he pardoned the largest number, 1,500 of the violent insurrectionists. But he only commuted the sentences of those the worst who had been convicted of seditious conspiracy, which meant they weren't going to go to prison, but they still had records. Now Todd Blanche, who is beyond disgraceful, is trying to erase those records. Absolutely true.
We have to add a couple more elements to this, though. And the one in particular is, uh, Pete Higgseth, who's quoting the script. That's true. That's true. That's true.
Quoting the scripture in front of an audience at the Department of Defense, not the Department of War. Only it wasn't from the scripture. It was from a movie, a Quentin Tarantino movie, which has a graphic scene in it of a sexual predator keeping a prisoner, a man prisoner in his basement, and then raping him.
And I think that is what stuck out for Pete Higgseth in the movie, along with the phone he quote from scripture.
I mean, Pete Higgseth, first of all, you know, he says he wants it to be called the Department
of War and he wants to be the Secretary of War. What he really wants it to be is the Department of Freebeer, right? The guy, the guy, he's like such a frat boy and such an idiot, but both, I mean, you understand politics.
βAnd I really think it would be useful for you to explain to Pete, but how important theβ
Catholic vote is to the Republican Party. So you have a couple of tears here of voters who have been a part of the mega coalition. One certainly is the evangelical Protestants. Many of whom I am sure are still harbor deep prejudice against Catholics, which goes back many, many centuries.
The second is the Catholic working-class vote. First of whom have reverence for the Pope. And for him, now he's, I just saw before we begin to take this, that he is backtrack a little bit. And his backtracking was, look, the Pope can say whatever he wants, but he doesn't understand
where we can't allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
That's the most important thing.
And then he went on to say, and his brother is a complete mega guy.
βSo that's how he's trying to say, "Outout damn spot."β
So he can get back in the good graces of many Catholics. But I got to believe that for many of them, this is a bridge too far. Well, it's the combination. It's the president, depicting himself as Jesus and attacking the Pope and the vice president who killed the last Pope.
That may be a slight overstatement, but he saw him in the next day, was dead and draw your own conclusions. Yeah. But then, you know, as he's writing a book about being a Catholic, he lectures the Pope. Hegseth regularly getting lectured by the Pope because the Pope can't stand what these
guys are saying or doing about the war, they're playing. Meanwhile, Catholics cut, I think the last election, I'll have the numbers slightly off, but they broke something like 5543 for Trump.
βAnd so this is perhaps the most important swing block for maga that there is out there,β
a bunch of them are hugely alienated by his immigration policies. Of course, they're alienated by his economic policies. And now he's not only going after the Pope, but as you say, these are working class Americans, he's going after a Pope, who's from the south side of Chicago, who's a white socks fan, who's one of them.
He's got to be the most sort of relatable Pope to this big American audience that there has ever been, it's, you know, crazy. You know, my new favorite presidential candidate for 2028 is Pope Leo. There's nothing that says you can't be Pope and president at the same time. Great suggestion, Norman.
Very construct. However, I should note that the Pope's brother who is close to the Pope, they play
Wordle together every morning.
Oh, that's a bad sign, Norman.
βHad serious death threats, and they had to basically evacuate his neighborhood after allβ
of this, which I'm sure is why Trump is now backtracking a little bit and saying that the brothers fold maga, but let's note one other element here in the last couple of days, David, about what a psychopath this president is. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has broken with him as we know, called Trump and said, my son is getting serious death threats.
And Trump's response was, if he dies, it's your fault. So that's what we're dealing with here. Well, I can add something to that to totally different thing, but Trump, who's like, you know, on the one hand, is maybe trying to make a little nicer with some Catholics, maga Catholic.
Apparently, in the past 24 hours, said, you know, the $11 million we're going to give
to Catholic charities in Miami to help people eat in Miami, we're canceling that. I mean, he's he's canceling money for Catholics, because he didn't like where the Pope comes out on all this stuff. Yeah.
βAnd the Pope, who is, I believe, an Augustinian, which means that he is a disciple ofβ
Saint Augustine, who defined the concept of just war. And we have all of these maga people saying he obviously doesn't know what a just war is, which is as absurd as almost anything surrounding this, and that these maga Catholics are trying to defend him is itself just a real lesson in what a cult can do. Yeah.
Well, particularly, if you know anything about just war theory or Saint Augustine, which when I was in college, we had to read Saint Augustine as part of the contemporary civilization, of course, we added Columbia, or maybe it was the humanities, I don't know. There were a couple of courses, read all this stuff, but just war theory goes like this. If your country is attacked, you have the right to defend yourself against the attacker.
βAs it happens, this specific definition of just war theory underscores that in this war,β
we are the aggressor, we are the party that is wronging the other party, and in fact, Iran would be justified to defend itself. In other words, they have it backwards, but they're all out there spouting this nonsense, because some staffer came up with it, Mike Johnson, I know one of your favorite people in Washington yesterday, was talking, and who's so religious that he spends all his time
trying to support the rapist, fraud, psychopath, president of the United States, naturally stepped up and said, oh, the president didn't mean this stuff about Jesus, and yeah, it's just worth hearing. We're allowed to do this. At the same time, speaking of just war, headset continues to boast about blowing up fishing
boats, going after the people inside without any proof that they are peddling drugs, and if they are, they're not going to America in any event, and multiple times after some
it survived the initial strikes, going back a second time and killing them, which is what
we defined in the second world war as a war crime, and today, headset complained that if somebody, namely Iran, fires, missiles at boats in the Strait of Hormuz, that's a terrorist act, so the level of hypocrisy here, plus the level of cruelty, and the level of willingness to commit war crimes, shows no bounds. Yeah, and we continue to do it.
We did, we did tacked a couple more boats in the Pacific, and, you know, as we pointed out before, but it's worth pointing out again, so those of you who are listing can go and use this at your next cocktail party, you know, or wherever you go, barbecues with warming up, maybe you're going to go to a barbecue, and this is going to come up.
The reality is this, if these people are guilty of drug smuggling, a, doesn't make them
terrorists, because being a drug smuggler, stop the same as the terrorists, b, they are entitled to do process with, sure, not getting, yeah, see if they were tried for drugs smuggling, there is no death penalty for drug smuggling, so they're being given the death penalty without do process for, you know, this alleged crime for which, you know, they may or may
Not be guilty, and on top of that, you know, well, we're going after the, the...
old enough to remember the movie, The Shoes of the Fisherman, which is a reference to
βthe fact that St. Peter who started the Catholic Church was a fisherman, so we're blowingβ
up Fisherman consistent with our whole, I mean, if you had to say, what is the guiding principle of the Trump administration, and I say this with a certain degree of Jewish humility here, but if you were had to say what was the guiding principle of the Trump administration, you would say take whatever Jesus taught and do the opposite. Somebody said, Nick Kristoff today, and a social media post about these strikes on Fisherman
said, this is not W.W. J.D. What would Jesus do? And I said, no, it's W.W. M. N. Excuse me, N. M. P. What would a malignant narcissistic psychopath do? And that's so what we're dealing with here. Yeah, I don't think those bracelets will sell very well, but if you want it, we can try, we don't have much words matter, swag, we could start making some, got to get some swag. Yeah, no, I think the bracelets might be a place to start, but you know, the point is,
βa quarter zip, that's what, you know, is what you know from here. Yeah, no, exactly, that'sβ
what I'm, I'm Mr. Q. Z. Yeah, I could note for that, but I, there is a, you know, broader point, I'd like to make, I'm going to probably make it in a column to more to the hair tomorrow, but, but, but the broader point is this, I just listen to all these lunatics. Every day, there's some lunatic story. And you go, and you go, oh my God, this is insane. This got the guy literally, if Donald Trump popped out of your local kuku clock, he could
not be kuku or, then he is, you know, with this, this stuff, but it's not the sign of insanity that worries me. What worries me is, Donald Trump has become more and more erratic. He does things more impulsively. He has fewer filters. Even as use of obscene language when he's talking, has grown because he has all the signs of dementia. This is not, this is not political.
I'm not, I'm a geopolitical surgeon. The reality is the guy is losing it. And we're like,
entertained by it, but it's like, you know, it's like having, I don't know, a chimpanzee, flying the plane, we're all on. It's kind of an entertaining story until we get to the ending. You know, that's absolutely correct. And it would be troubling for any president undergoing dementia. But every previous president, including to a degree, Trump and his first term, had was surrounded by people who understanding this, if it had happened, would have not obeyed
crazy orders, would have tried to keep the airplane from crashing with all of us on board. And what is more frightening, even than the fact that we have a president showing signs every day of dementia, is that there is no one around him who would do just that, who would keep it from creating out of control. Whatever the crazy order, they're going to carry it out. You know, I was, I went back and looked at the clip yesterday and then put it up on social
βmedia from Woody Allen's movie bananas, 1971. And for those who remember it, even for those whoβ
don't, Woody Allen plays this nebbish, of course, who ends up on the island of San Mark and the country of San Marcos and gets hooked up with the revolutionaries who overthrow
the vicious dictator and the revolutionary leader takes over. And the first thing he says is,
I am now running this country. And I have some decrees. The official language of San Marcos will be Swedish. And everyone on this, in this country, shall change their underwear every 30 minutes and they must wear them on the outside so that we can see that they're keeping up with the decree. And third, everyone under 16 is now 16. Now Woody Allen and the lieutenant to the new dictator, look at each other and the other guy says he's, he's lost control. He's, it's gone to his head
and they remove him. And that's the difference. They removed him. Well, but, but, but here's,
this is, this is a more serious point. I actually wrote a book about this one. The during the first
Term, Trump had a bunch of people around him who, when he started doing crazy...
going to end now or I'm going to pull troops out of Europe. I'm going to shoot protesters and
βshoot protesters in the legs or I'm going to fire missiles at Mexico, which is something he broughtβ
up, et cetera, et cetera. They would say no. And it really frustrated him. And so he spent four years stewing in his own juices and saying, if I get to be president again, I am going to have a bunch of loyalist, yes man around me who will do whatever I say no matter what and who pose no threat to me personally. And so he has this bunch of absolute idiots around him who are just, and we're seeing it because he's doing so many things that any rational human being would say, well, no,
that's illegal. You know, he's made five billion dollars of a grift. Somebody should say, well,
you know, Mr. President, that's illegal or don't have your sons selling drones to our allies. Or don't have your son, I'll do this. Or don't start this crazy war or don't say you're going to invade our neighbor or don't try to block made order. They're hundreds. I don't have a heroin addict in charge of the health care system of the United States who's taking away vaccines and putting, you know, people, you know, and snake oil sells people in charge of our health care system.
There's some dude in this Trump orbit who keeps insisting that he has, he was teleported into a 7/11 head official at FEMA, right? But the point is he has surrounded himself for precisely this reason that unlike the wisdom of the character Woody Allen plays and bananas and we must stipulate Woody Allen as a disgusting human these days, but Fielding Mellish, which is why one can't help but say he's the nabbage because it sounds like nabbage. Yes, but Fielding Mellish and these people, they knew
this dude was nuts and they said, let's do something about it. There's nobody around Trump and on Capitol Hill, there's still like more weapons for Israel went through yesterday, despite Democrats really starting to say no, we're going to stop this. They're blocking every week somebody say, well, what about the war powers act? Let's follow the Constitution, the Republicans block it. When he does this crazy shit and says, oh, I'm Jesus,
think I'm always joking, he doesn't mean that Jesus, you know, I mean it's it's and we're now
accepting, we just sort of go, oh yeah, oh yeah, that's just the way it is buckle in, we've got two and a half more years of it. You know, I will say, as you say, we just accepted so many in the press take what he says and report it as they would for any other president when in so many instances, it's flat out lies or utterly nuts and they don't put it into the context of he's lying or he's nuts and it's worse and there's that there's a little subtle element of DC corruption at play here
βthat I think it's useful for us to shine a light on. Yes, I'm not going to name the journalists,β
but a journalist goes on, you know, media today and says the reason Donald Trump is doing this blockade is to apply pressure to China, which is dependent on Iran for the energy. And I'm like listening to this and I'm going, well, that's not true. Donald Trump's nuts, he wasn't going to do this two days ago. He has no plan. There is no strategy and oh, by the way, the Chinese are a supplying information to the Iranians about how to kill Americans and we're not pushing back on it
and be there is zero chance that the US naval blockade would stop the Chinese because it would cause a world war of global incident and Donald Trump wants to go to China in a few weeks and have a good time. And so this was all wrong. Now, you might say, well, okay, there's a lot of wrong analysis
βafter the question is why? Why would a good reporter say stuff that was such bullshit?β
The answer is he wants to get access in the White House. And so they call him up and they say, hey,
you know what, I'd like you to come in. Let's have a talk and they come in, they have a talk and they go, well, let me tell you about the president's plan and it'll be a deep background, but if you want to write about it, you can and they got, okay, president's plan is, there's
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
complete bullshit, they don't invite him back. Yeah, and of course, what we've seen is, and just
βagain, before we started, he was doing another one of those gags with the press. They love the factβ
that he gives them enormous access. Whenever anyone asks a reasonable, responsible, tough question, he goes after the reporter, you're, you know, horrible, you're who do you work for? Oh, of course. And if you had an honest press corps that cared about integrity, they would all refuse to speak to him or at minimum. If somebody asked a reasonable question and he wouldn't answer it and moved on to the next one, have the next one asked the question until he answered it, but they do none of that.
In another two weeks, less than two weeks, we will have the famous White House Corps Espondent
Stinner, which has for a long time, basically been a kind of masturbatory self-congratulation
βfor the press corps. Trump is going this year and you can bet that they will softpettle the jokesβ
and they will praise him and treat him like a normal president. And it's one of the worst features as we slide rapidly towards a police state that one of the safeguards were supposed to have. The guardrails were supposed to have. The vigorous free press and some are out there. Pro-Publica is wonderful. Julie Kay Brown and the Miami-Herald have not given up on the Epstein story. There's an awful lot of good stuff that happens in the New York Times. The Minneapolis-Star
Tribune, as I've said before, a terrific regional paper that doesn't pull its punches, Philadelphia, and choir often, but so much of the rest, the opposite. And we're seeing now as we head towards the White House Corps Espondent Stinner, David Ellison and the paramount people are going to hold all kinds of parties where they will fet Trump and his cabinet. And it's just pathetic, absolutely pathetic. So that's the good news.
βOh, good. Do you want to go to the bad news now? What's the bad news?β
You know, there's one thing I would say just to my reflections a little bit on what's happening with Iran. I was at a dinner last night with somebody very knowledgeable about the negotiations that
had taken place earlier. And what we know from the Omanes who were the interlocutors in the first
round of negotiations is that the offer that the Iranians put on the table was shockingly good. It was better than the JCPOA, the original Obama-led nuclear deal with Iran. And apparently, one of two things happened. Either Steve Wittkov and Jared Kushner were so ignorant or dumb that they didn't understand what the deal was. And of course, they didn't have any technical support to tell them so. Or two, they went back and said, you know, there's a pretty
decent deal here. And Trump had a phone call as all speculation on my part with BB Netanyahu. And BB said, you're the greatest peacemaker through strength of all time. Look what you did in Venezuela. You join us in bombing Iran and taking out their leaders. And we have all kinds of support inside the dissident community. They will rise up and overthrow this regime. And it will be the most wonderful thing. And there is the Nobel Peace Prize on a platter for you.
And Trump thinking that this would be another Venezuela went ahead. And we've ended up going from an open straight O4 news to the craziness that we have now. But I want to take it to the next level. Let's say that Trump who wants to cut a deal badly, he sees his greatest strength as being
the art of the deal, even though we know we never read the book much less wrote it. And you can
imagine cutting a deal with the Iranians who may have the upper hand now in the region, but who are really suffering economically from the sanctions and now to some degree from, you know, what's
Happened to their infrastructure?
move forward with their enriched uranium is going to be lifting the sanctions. So what happens if we end up with a deal that's probably worse than the JCPOA, which BB railed against and mobilized everybody he could against it. And now Iran has an improved economy with money that they can give to Hezbollah and Hamas and the hoodies. BB Netanyahu could end up in the worst possible place because his great friend is best buddy Donald Trump has screwed him and everybody else completely
in this process. And how he reacts to that will be one of the most interesting things that we'll see. Well, look, we talked about this a couple of times this week. I had a podcast on Monday with John Wolfstall who helped to go shape the JCPOA and Joe Serencione who's one of our leading arms control experts and that I did a podcast yesterday with Ed Luz, Rosa Brooks who been tracking this and Rosa of course also was a senior policy official defense department and
βTom Nichols of the Atlantic and you know I think the general consensus was that the scenarioβ
describes probably what's going to happen. Trump's going to cut a deal and it is going to be a deal which will leave us in a worse position both to where we were on February 27th the day before they started and to what we got with the JCPOA in 2015 with President Obama which then of course
Donald Trump pulled out of in 2019. But you know I think you're scenario first of all I've heard
the same thing. I've heard people who were in the negotiations shocked at the ignorance of Whitcoff and Jared on the core elements of the deal on how nuclear deals work on how you get the assurances that it's not going to go in the wrong direction. But the second part the part where they have an offer and they go back and it falls apart I think near scenario is in the general zip code
βof correct. I think it's important for everybody to remember that last year there were negotiations goingβ
on. These are the ones you're talking about that involved oh mind and what happened? Well what happened was that the United States was close to a deal Trump spoke to Netanyahu and they decided the deal wouldn't be good enough for Netanyahu persuaded Trump it wouldn't be good enough for them on nukes and so they went in even in the middle of well of negotiations going well and they bombed Iran last summer. This time again the negotiations were going well
and Netanyahu said no we can't trust them go in and attack. Now the question is why would in two
circumstances Netanyahu do this and the answer briefly is first of all Netanyahu is advised
every US president he's dealt with that they should attack Iran. Trump was the only sucker who fell for it. But secondly Netanyahu's got an election coming up in October and if in fact there is some kind of peace and if in fact there you know he can't be on the war footing and if in fact people start recognizing that Iran's going to come out on the other side stronger Netanyahu could lose and if Netanyahu loses he's likely to go and be prosecuted and go to jail and so he is trying
βdesperately for his own survival to torpedo anything that looks like peace and I think we're comingβ
for all that I'm starting to go into this such length but I think we're coming to a point of crisis in the Trump Netanyahu relationship because Trump wants out of this so desperately that he is likely to run a foul of Netanyahu who wants to make sure we stay in it and it'll be interesting to see whether Netanyahu's last bridge because he's burned every other
bridge in the US ends up getting burnt because one president finally followed through in his
suggestion and it was revealed to be the disaster everybody else knew it would be and you know the other part of this is that all of our relationships in the region in the Middle East have been shattered because of what Trump has done the Saudis the Emirates all the other countries there
That were attacked and suffered significantly after we bombed Iran having los...
their own infrastructure some of their oil and the inability now to you know take whatever would
come from being able to export that oil all because Trump did this and very likely never communicated
with them in advance they're not going to trust him very much and of course what you also know that the Iranians thanks to the Russians giving them assistance with satellites and and a lot of the imagery that they had some of which probably they were able to get because they were listening
βinto Pete Heggseth on his signal chat or tapping into Trump's phone destroyed really importantβ
infrastructure in the huge bases we have in these countries in the Middle East causing a lot of
damage billion dollar radar facilities and other things and we're going to ask these countries to
rebuild our bases in that region so the damage that Trump has done to our national security through all of this to our credibility to our relationships not just with the Europeans who you know we're not told in advance and have no interest in losing troops or material or getting deeply involved in spending a lot of money to bailing him out and of course he continues to attack NATO but our other allies and you know this is all it all goes back to a weak-minded
βflailing feeble president acting on impulse and having no understanding of the consequences ofβ
what he was doing uh excellent summation and it brings us full circle right back to the point that we wanted to deliver to everybody here with this weak sedition of words matter and that is that the heroin addict raccoon penis collector in this administration is not the craziest or most dangerous person in the administration. Yeah I will uh close with this I'm gonna I'm noodling around with a piece on the three parts of Trumpocracy.
Kackett'socracy which we've discussed before government by the worst most incompetent around us and there isn't a single figure in this cabinet who doesn't fit that picture
βplus a whole host of others like the FEMA guy who uh swears he was teleported and nowβ
the possibility that neo-nazzi sebgorka will be running the counterintelligence center.
The second part is nihilocracy and we're getting more and more information about what doge did
there is a book coming out about AID and doge and which we learn that the young people who blew up AID and caused the deaths of probably 750000 people had no clue what AID did or what they were doing and it's all about blowin stuff up they're blowing up government they're getting rid of anybody with any level of expertise in almost any area and the third of course as we've discussed far too many times is kleptocracy. This is more corrupt than every other administration
in history combined starting right at the top and it has direct implications for our well-being and our national security and that's something we're gonna have to deal with even if we have a midterm election and it's a reasonably fair one and we see a change in majority in the house and we hope the Senate because they have the confirmation power we're gonna have to endure this for another three years and that is not gonna be a pleasant experience for any of us. No question about it
by the way we'll throw a fourth word that you can throw into this and that is which is a real word a stultocracy and a stultocracy is a government by fools and so we've got that in there it's part of cacostocracy and part of in this case kleptocracy because they are fools and they are the worst among us they're also demented and fortunately where as you can't rely as we said on the mainstream media it can rely an independent media you can find norms writing at the
Contrary and a good place to find that kind of thing.
you know you can you can the need to know sub-stack you can go there we both write for the new
βrepublic you can go there there are a lot of places that you can go but of course the most importantβ
one is the DSR network right here words matter every week if you have not gone to YouTube
and subscribed on YouTube now is the time to do it because not only is that easy not only does
that allow you to see the shows but also clips from the shows and everything else that we're doing but if you go to YouTube and subscribe then when you're watching the shows it's super easy to
comment and we love the comments that we get from you and we will address the questions that you
raise and we will respond to most of the comments you know the ones that suggest we had addressed differently or or or part of her differently we may not do that but but we'll listen we'll listen with just two days ago norm there was a comment from one of our loyal listeners who said I'm sorry I missed words matter over the weekend I was traveling but I tuned in
βbecause norm and David are two of my favorite choose what but hey look if that's what you likeβ
if that if you're here for that join us you know be mishpooker and if somebody has a suggestion about parting my hair thank you very much it's been a long time since I could part my hair
βwell I think you parted your hair a little bit like the red scene was parted yeah that's about itβ
yes just a big lane down the middle yeah you've got a mega mega part and it looks fantastic all right everybody thanks for joining us again here this week and join us every week here words matter at the DSR network at all those other places we mentioned please subscribe we'll be with you again soon


