The Headlines
The Headlines

Canada Is ‘at War’ With U.S. Over Tariffs, and U.S.P.S. Publishes Plan to Restrict Ballots

2h ago10:431,723 words
0:000:00

Plus, what it’s like to live next to a roller coaster.  Here’s what we’re covering: Canada-U.S. Trade War: What to Know, by The New York Times Pentagon Fires Editor and Publisher of Independent Milita...

Transcript

EN

I'm Danny Blum, and the health reporter at the New York Times.

We're bombarded with claims about how to live better and feel better.

It's really hard to separate facts from fiction.

I am scouring the science, speaking with leading experts, making sure that everything I write is rigorously research reported and that I can back it up. When the science isn't clear, sometimes that is the story. That's a level of nuance and depth you're not going to get just floating around the internet. And it's what you get when you subscribe to the New York Times.

From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Tracy Munkford. Today's Monday, August 24th.

Here's what we're covering.

We're going to start with three updates on the Trump administration. First, we cannot accept what they've offered and we will not give what they've asked. In a forceful speech this weekend, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country was now quote at war with the U.S.

After trade talks fell apart, and the White House put in place new 50% tariffs on billions

of dollars in Canadian goods. We've been under no illusions. We recognized from the start that America has changed. We recognized that sometimes its signature was written in pencil. All of last week, U.S. and Canadian negotiators had been working to hash out a new trade

agreement following President Trump's latest tariff threats.

And Trump even extended his deadline a few days, saying a deal was close. But Carney said that in addition to disagreements about the tariffs themselves, U.S. negotiators made other last-minute demands that he found unacceptable, including trying to force Canada to roll back its efforts to promote French, which is an official language in the country. The new tariffs affect a relatively small proportion of U.S. Canada trade, but they will

hit a wide range of goods. Everything from dairy products to plywood, which could drive up U.S. construction costs. In Canada, according to one estimate, some 90,000 jobs could be lost because of the levies. And Carney vowed to retaliate dollar for dollar on American goods, starting next month.

Also, the defense department has fired the publisher and editor-in-chief of the government funded military news outlet, Stars and Stripes, along with one of its Middle East correspondence. The firings came less than two weeks after Stars and Stripes reported on the hardships that sailors have been facing on the U.S. Abraham Lincoln, the aircraft carrier that's been deployed for months longer than anticipated.

According to the editor-in-chief, his termination notice cited in subordination, as well as an unauthorized media appearance. He, in the Middle East correspondent, had recently gone on TV to talk about accusations that the outlets editorial independence has been undermined by the Trump administration. For decades, federal regulations and Pentagon policy had emphasized that there should

be no censorship and that, quote, "withholding of unfavorable news is prohibited." But earlier this year, the Pentagon rescinded that regulation, fired the outlets internal editorial watchdog and the DOD's chief spokesman said that the publication needed to quote, "refocus its content away from woke distractions that siphon morale." And last update, the U.S. Postal Service has finalized its plans to restrict mail-in ballots

in line with an earlier executive order from President Trump cracking down on that voting method. The Postal Service says that, under the new rule, it would review every envelope with a ballot, and would not deliver any in-states that do not share voter data with the federal government.

The key thing to know is that the Postal Service says this plan will only go into place

if the Supreme Court rules in favor of the President, whose voting restrictions have for the most part been blocked by lower courts. The justices could rule on this at any time. Trump has repeatedly made baseless claims that voting by mail, which historically Democrats have done more than Republicans, is cheating, and he said explicitly that limiting mail-in voting

would quote, "Gare and T the midterms" for his party. In the Western U.S., federal officials have stepped into a long-running dispute over

how to distribute water from the Colorado River, a critical water source, which is running

dangerously low. The river supplies drinking water to over 40 million people, and is used to irrigate millions of acres of farmland across seven states and parts of Mexico. But years of drought and overuse have pushed reservoirs along the river to record lows, straining a system that was designed long before cities like Phoenix were some of the fastest

growing in the country. The situation has pitted states against each other and set off years of negotiations about

Who can use how much water, according to the administration's new plan, the t...

in the lower section of the river, Arizona, California, and Nevada, have agreed to sharp cuts

over the next two years.

Arizona will be hit the hardest, losing about a third of its allocation from the river.

In all, the states will need to rely more on groundwater, boost water efficiency, and limit some users. The agricultural industry in particular is likely to feel the pressure. Nearly half of the Colorado River's water goes towards growing crops to feed livestock. For the moment, the other states in the river basin, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Wyoming have refused to accept any mandatory cuts.

One of the negotiators involved in trying to design a long-term strategy for the region, called this round of restrictions, quote, "a bridge, not a permanent solution." He said that all seven states that rely on the river will need to take action in the coming years to avoid a water crisis. In Ukraine, the times is covering the emergence of an experimental new weapon on the battlefield.

Finally, autonomous drones, guided by artificial intelligence. Both Russia and Ukraine have been

using AI and drones to some extent before. With those older models, the drone charts its

own way to a target that a human has picked. Now, the latest generation of AI-powered drones pick their own targets. A former Ukrainian defense minister told the times that over the past few months, the Ukrainian military has been testing entirely autonomous AI systems on Russian targets. And recently, the wreckage from a Russian drone attack showed evidence that the Kremlin

is using them too. Analysis of debris from a strike in Zaporizha found that a Russian drone had Nvidia mini computers on board. Ukrainian officials said it appeared to be targeting a gas station before it crashed into the wall of an apartment building, killing three people.

Experts say that autonomous weapons can be trained on thousands of images to recognize categories like military truck or person, and then use cameras to home in on and strike those specific targets. Those in support of the new technology say it has the potential to be more accurate than say dropping bombs from a plane or relying on a human drone pilot.

Some actually think all weapons should be required to have AI systems in the future. And opponents of these weapons, including human rights groups and the International Red Cross, say they may be more prone to mistakes or violations of international law, like failing to distinguish between soldiers and civilians. The Ukrainian air defense commander in the town where the Russian drone exploded warned that

we may be entering an entirely new era of warfare, saying quote, "In a few years, we will be living in a Terminator movie, it's no joke, machines are making decisions to strike."

And finally, in California, engineers at the Universal Studios Hollywood theme park spent years

trying to pull off the impossible. They wanted to build a new roller coaster that would loop and spin and hurl people around at 72 miles per hour and barely make a sound. That way the rumbling and roaring of the coaster wouldn't disrupt filming at Universal's own movie studios, which are right next door, and it would spare the residential neighborhoods

that are right near the park from all the noise. By the time they started doing riderless test runs last month, it seemed like they'd pulled it off. Some neighbors called it "wisper quiet," but, once the riders got on, the screaming started. Now, nearby residents say that every 30 seconds or so, for 10 hours straight, the air is filled

with shrieks of people in blood curdling terror, and it reaches all the way to their homes. One woman told the times, "She could hear the screams even after taking out her hearing aids." Universal says, "It did take screaming into account. The ride has noise blocking scream screens, built in, and the coaster's cars are programmed

to spin riders so they're facing away from nearby homes at, quote, "key scream moments."

But the complaints have been flooding in, even as Universal has started expanding a sound wall, and agreed to limit the ride's hours. The controversy is hanging over the coaster, which the park had been hoping would help revive attendance and keep it competitive with Disneyland. At this point, it's unclear what could actually fix the situation.

Universal might have to take a page out of a Japanese theme parks playbook, which, as a safety

Precaution when it reopened during the pandemic, urged people not to open the...

but to, quote, "Please scream inside your heart."

Those are the headlines.

Today on The Daily, Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman on what we know about

Trump's closest aid, Natalie Hark.

She's an assistant to the President.

She makes $150,000 a year on the taxpayer salary, but her role is a Morphus, in terms

of an actual job title, what she does is she will provide him with articles from very

fringe websites that can affirm some of what he wants to see.

She provides him with video, she provides him with pieces of paper, she provides him with

whatever he needs. You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. And if you are not at Times subscriber yet, you can get a full month of free access to everything we publish when you download the Times app now. I'm Tracy Mumford, we'll be back tomorrow.

Compare and Explore