Special Episode: Your Questions About the Iran War, Answered

I mean, as of availability, Hopkins,

yeah, as soon as you get the New York Times. What is pretty difficult to report from Russia? Often I'm the only New York Times reporter in the country. I keep working in Russia because what happens here matters and our audience deserves to get a broad perspective of the world that they live in.

“If you want to make sure we can keep doing this work,”

subscribe to the New York Times. From the New York Times, I'm Tracy Mumford and this is a special bonus episode of The Headlines. With the war in Iran approaching the two-month mark, the state of negotiations in flux and the whole world weathering the effects of a spike in oil prices,

we are answering some of your questions about the conflict. First up, Josh from DC asked, "What is the best estimate for spending on the war? And is there a comparison for what that amount of money would have covered if spent elsewhere?" Like housing, healthcare, education. I just want to confirm this.

You have no idea how much has been spent on the war so far. The question is actually the same one that senators have put to the White House recently. We don't have that figures right now. I think in part because it's fluctuating on a day and day all basis. The White House budget director has not given an answer.

Analysts, though, have estimated it's around $1 billion a day.

In terms of what that could pay for. "We have all these other people were fighting wars, but we can't take care of daycare." President Trump himself said the military budget takes priority over things like child care. By one estimate, the cost of just the first month of the war,

about 30 billion, is roughly what a year of universal pre-school for American 3-in-4-year-olds would cost. Next question, Hartley from New York asked how the people of Iran feel about the war, particularly since the Iranian regime has been so unpopular. Now, there's no clear, simple answer to this one. Right after Iran's Supreme Leader,

Ali Haminay was killed in the first hours of the war, large crowds of people poured into the streets to celebrate, chanting freedom, freedom. Getting a broader sense of how people feel, though, is complicated. Roughly 99% of the country has been cut off from the internet.

Incoming international calls are blocked, then my colleagues try to reach people by text message and the occasional VPN connection. On the ground, there's a very vocal, hard-line contingent that is out in the streets almost every night, cheering on the regime and telling them not to surrender to the US.

But my colleagues have also heard from Iranians who feel discouraged that the regime is still in place. They feel like they live through the destruction, but nothing changed. One woman wrote, quote, "I feel as if we are not in control of our lives and none of the actors in this war, not the United States, not Israel, and certainly not the Iranian regime care about the Iranian people."

Now a third question, Frank from Cincinnati asked, "For many years, it was well understood that closure of the Strait of Hormuz would constitute a grave threat to the worldwide economy."

“What reporting is there that Trump was warned of this?”

Yes, it is true that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is not an issue that came out of nowhere.

Images of military drills by Iran's revolutionary gods in the streets of Hormuz

just two weeks before the US and Israel began attacking Iran, Iran's military was holding exercises in the Strait, meant to demonstrate that they would be willing to close the waterway for leverage. My colleagues have reported that Trump's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also flagged this risk to the president, but the Israeli Prime Minister and his team had a different take

when they came to the White House to pitch Trump on the war. They were more optimistic, arguing that Iran would be so weakened by the first wave of attacks, it wouldn't be able to close the Strait. And last question, which several people wrote in with, "Where is Secretary of State Marco Rubio in all of this?" Isn't it his job, not by his president, J.D. advances, to be leading any

potential peace talks?" I put this question to my colleague Michael Crowley, who covers diplomacy. Rubio is not playing a visible role in the negotiations with Iran, and it's not even clear how involved he is behind the scenes. That's definitely very unusual for an American Secretary of

“State, but remember that Mr. Rubio is working two jobs right now. One, as Secretary of State,”

and the other, as President Trump's national security adviser, which keeps him at the White House, where he advises the president and manages meetings. And he really hasn't been spending as much time traveling overseas and conducting diplomacy abroad as other secretaries of State. So really, it seems like we should refer to Marco Rubio as national security adviser, Marco Rubio, or rather than defaulting to calling him Secretary of State.

That is it for this Q&A episode of the show. Thanks to everyone who wrote in,

I'm Tracy Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow.