The Headlines
The Headlines

Who Is Running Iran, and How Doctors Cashed In on a Consumer Protection Law

2h ago11:001,825 words
0:000:00

Plus, the Labubus linked to forced labor.  Here’s what we’re covering: A New Era and New Leadership: The Generals Who Are Running Iran, by Farnaz Fassihi A 60-Day Deadline Could Pressure Trump on Endi...

Transcript

EN

I'm Valerie Hopkins, I cover Russia for the New York Times.

I mean, as about Valerie Hopkins, yeah, as soon as I get the New York Times. What? It's pretty difficult to report from Russia. Often I'm the only New York Times reporter in the country.

I keep working in Russia because what happens here matters and our audience deserves to get a broad perspective of the world that they live in.

If you want to make sure we can keep doing this work,

subscribe to the New York Times. From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Thursday, April 23rd.

Here's what we're covering.

One of the key questions swarling as the U.S. attempts to negotiate an end to the war in Iran is, who is really running Iran. The new Supreme Leader, I had told a most about how many, was wounded in air strikes at the start of the war, which killed his father, the previous Supreme Leader.

And he's been in hiding while he recovers. He still has not been seen in public since he took over, and that has fed into uncertainty about the country's leadership. To try and trace Iran's new power structure,

the Times spoke with senior Iranian officials,

members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and others familiar with the country's inner workings. Several officials told the Times that hominase injuries are severe. He's had surgery on his hand and legs, and his face and lips were badly burned,

making it difficult for him to speak. They say he sharpen and engaged, but he hasn't released a video or audio message because he doesn't want to appear weak in his first public address. Also, because of fears that he could be targeted again,

messages to him are handwritten, sealed in envelopes, and relayed via a human chain from one career to the next. They travel on highways and back roads and cars and on motorcycles until they reach his hideout. His responses go back the same way.

That combination of his injuries and the challenge of reaching him

has led hominase to delegate decision-making

to commanders in the Revolutionary Guard Corps.

It's essentially left the hard-line military calling the shots. Those generals were the ones who came up with the strategy of closing the straight-of-war moves and of striking neighboring countries in the Gulf. They were the ones who agreed to the temporary ceasefire, and who decided to pull the plug on more peace talks this week,

because they felt President Trump was trying to pressure Iran to surrender. Overall, Iranian officials tell the times "The generals are feeling confident in this moment, like they've been able to prevent the US and Israel from toppling the regime, and that the country still has leverage in the conflict."

Now, a few more quick updates on the war. Yesterday, Iran tightened its stranglehold on the straight-of-war moves, saying it had seized two ships trying to get through, and there were reports that other ships were fired on. Before the war, more than 130 vessels went through the waterway every day,

and there was hope that the ceasefire would get those numbers back up, but with Iran renewing its attacks, traffic in the straight has pretty much come to a halt. Also, I was approached by more than 10 of the most vulnerable and forced countries in terms of energy, and they asked us to extend that sanction. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant doubled down yesterday on the Trump administration's decision

to extend a sanctions exemption on Russian oil, as a way of trying to ease the energy crisis sparked by the war. Russian oil had previously been blacklisted because of the war in Ukraine, but the Treasury Department said it wants to ensure "all oil is available to those who need it."

Bessant first paused the sanctions in March, saying it was temporary.

According to one analysis, that move caused Russian oil revenues to surge, nearly doubling last month, and providing a financial lifeline for the Kremlin. And last update on the war. President Trump is staring down a looming deadline for U.S. military operations in Iran. By law, the President can wage war for 60 days without getting congressional approval, but at that point lawmakers need to authorize it to continue.

For Trump, that date is May 1st, next Friday. While Republicans in Congress have largely backed his campaign so far, some have signaled they won't continue that support after that deadline. If lawmakers don't authorize the war, Trump will either have to pull back immediately, or give himself a one-time 30-day extension that would be used to safely withdraw U.S. forces. There's also a chance he could push past the deadline all together, though,

which would not be unprecedented. In 2011, President Obama continued military operations in Libya

Passed 60 days, which prompted bipartisan backlash.

Republican and Democratic lawmakers banded together to take on one of the most

costly and frustrating parts of medical care. Surprise billing. Every year, millions of Americans

who unexpectedly saw a doctor out of network, often in emergency rooms, would be hit with far higher bills than what their health plans normally covered. So Congress passed the No Surprises Act, which barred out-of-network doctors from billing patients directly. Instead, physicians can take their claim to a government-approved arbitrator to try and make a case for how much they think the patient's insurance company should

pay them. This new law by all accounts did do a lot to solve the problem of surprise medical bills, so patients are no longer in the middle of these billing disputes between insurers and doctors, but what we found is that doctors have been flooding this new arbitration system with millions of claims and getting paid rates much much higher than they did

in the past. Sarah Cliff is an investigative health care reporter at the times. This arbitration

system is actually modeled on the way that major league baseball settles disputes. Each side submits what they think is a fair price for the medical care rendered. They submit some arguments, and then the arbitrator selects one of them. There is no middle ground. Somebody is going to win and once the arbitrator picks someone, that is the final decision. There is no route to appeal. Sometimes the numbers that insurers and doctors bring to the table are wildly different. There was

one case that we looked at where the insurance company offered $2,600 for a test of blood flow to the brain. The doctor asked for $330,000 and they won that dispute and got that money. We saw this happening repeatedly in this massive data set that had millions of claims. We saw a breast surgeon who was getting $440,000 for each breast reduction. He did. We saw a gynecologist who were getting 600 times the normal rates for placing a contraceptive called an IUD. The doctors are overwhelmingly

winning these disputes. We found that in 88% of the cases they win and they're often winning hundreds of times of what they used to get paid before this law passed. One of the mysteries is why the results are so lopsided. It's surprised the lawmakers who wrote this law when we asked them about it. There are a few theories. One is that the arbitrators are paid on a per case basis, so they have an incentive to render decisions favorable to doctors, to have doctors,

continuing them disputes. Another is that doctors are just viewed more positively by the public than insurance plans are, and maybe arbitrators have those same kind of biases that the general public does. Sarah says as a result of the huge new payouts doctors are getting, some insurance companies say they're having to raise premiums for patients. Essentially passing along the cost of this new arbitration system. A new study out this week found that after a national suicide prevention effort

went to effect a few years ago, the rate of youth suicides in the U.S. dropped. Three numbers helped me find the help I needed. 988 suicide increases left lane. The idea was to basically create the 911 of mental health, taking a 10-digit hotline number and simplifying it to just

988 lawmakers also put more than a billion dollars towards supporting crisis centers. Now,

researchers have found that in the first two and a half years after the hotline launched, the rate of suicides among young people was 11% below projections. There could be other factors driving the drop. For one thing, the hotline launched right as the country was coming out of the depths of the pandemic. But to try and get a true sense of the hotline's impact, the study compared suicide rates between states. It found that in places that had the biggest surge in

calls to 988, youth suicide rates dropped significantly more than places that saw a smaller uptick in calls. Overall, since 988 launched, it has fielded more than 25 million calls, texts, and online chats, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. And the agency

has asked Congress for another half billion dollars to fund the program for next year.

And finally, the Lububu craze over the last few years has meant that the furry little monster

dolls have been everywhere from backpack key chains to high-fashion runways. People have waited

in line for hours to buy them. Some of them go for thousands and thousands of dollars. But the best-selling toy has now been linked to forced labor in China, specifically in the Xinjiang region of the country. The U.S. government has banned the import of cotton from there over concerns

About human rights violations.

group that mostly lives in Xinjiang, commissioned a test of the cotton used in a Lububu, and the times

then independently confirmed the results. My colleagues took 20 of the dolls for testing, which showed

16 had clothing containing cotton from Xinjiang. There could be serious consequences for pop

mart, the Chinese company that sells Lububu's, companies found to have violated the U.S. restrictions

could have all their products banned. A spokeswoman for pop mart told the times it would conduct

an investigation into its supply chains, and that the company held itself and its suppliers to

the highest standards. One U.S. lawmaker, who co-chairs the Congressional Executive Commission

on China, said "pot mart should prove that all of its dolls in the United States are slave labor free."

Those are the headlines. Today on the daily, a look at what the recent monopoly case over live nation could mean for concert goers. You can find that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford, we'll be back tomorrow with the latest and the Friday News Quiz.

Compare and Explore