Hi, I'm Juliette from New York Times Games, and I'm here talking to fans abou...
So you play New York Times games? Yes, do you have a favorite? Connections.
“It just scratches an inch in my brain to be out of the box thinking with that game.”
I play with my husband every night. I refuse to let him play it without me. I love that it's like a real-life connection. Yes. Wow, you guys play connections.
Yeah, very sweet. I promise I didn't play that. New York Times Games subscribers get full access to all our games and features. Subscribe now at nytimes.com/games for a special offer. From the New York Times, it's the headlines.
I'm Tracy Munkert. Today's Wednesday, September 9th.
Here's what we're covering.
I'm here in Dallas for the first day of the unusual midterm convention that President Trump has decided to throw for the Republican Party. It's the first time in modern history that there's been something quite like this. My colleague Shane Goldmacher is in Texas, where Republicans are gathering today for the kind of high-profile event that normally only happens during the run-up to a presidential election.
President Trump will be headlining both nights of the GOP midterm convention, which one person involved in planning it told the Times is as much about boosting Trump himself as it is about boosting the party. The event is a chance for Republicans to raise money. Attendees, including lawmakers, are being charged $25,000 each, and it's also being pitched
as a way to galvanize voters ahead of the midterms, where the GOP is expected to face steep losses. But part of the story of this convention is who's not attending.
“There are a number of key Republicans who have decided not to come here to Texas to appear”
because President Trump is a potential drag on their chances to win this fall. President Trump's approval ratings are down, gas prices have been up, grocery prices have been up, some of the issues that voters said that they put Republicans back in power to deal with have been unaddressed. So one of the things we're watching is who is in fact in Dallas and who is not in Dallas
to get a sense of can Republicans win this fall by pulling Donald Trump closer to them, or do they need to push him away a little bit? It's going to be a tricky balance for the party. In the Middle East in recent days, there's been a burst of new attacks with Iran targeting
American warships for the first time.
It started over the weekend with Iran attempting to attack two U.S. military vessels. U.S. Central Command retaliated. Yesterday, a similar cycle seemed to play out again. The U.S. said it destroyed multiple Iranian oil tankers after Iran attempted to hit a U.S. Navy warship.
“So this was a line that Iran had been very hesitant to cross before.”
They were very reluctant to do the kind of strikes that could inflict heavy casualties for American forces, which is why we hadn't really seen them launch a major strike on a U.S. warship. American Solomon covers Iran for the times. Regional experts and political analysts in Iran that I've been speaking to say that what
we're seeing is basically Iran trying to signal its ready and willing to escalate.
From Iran's perspective, they're feeling really an economic squeeze from the U.S. Naval blockade, the country suffering from a fuel shortage crisis, the economic disparities is really palpable, they don't feel they have much to lose from expanding the conflict right now. Another thing you hear Iranian commentators say a lot is that this is the moment to do
it. Their convinced President Trump is going to launch a new round of war against them anyway once the U.S. mid-term elections are over. If his party wins, he'll feel emboldened. If they do poorly, their word he won't feel there's much reason not to go heavy on Iran.
So from their perspective, if they want to inflict a political cost on President Trump, they need to do that now. As Iran steps up its attacks, the global price of oil is now back over $100 a barrel. A milestone it's hit a few times since the war started. Overall, the price of oil is currently about 40% more than it was just before the fighting
began in February. The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists and all too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this. Yesterday, Britain, along with France and Canada, took a major step in turning up the political
pressure on Israel over the treatment of Palestinians. I do not believe the British people want us supporting the occupation by accepting products
From settlements in our shops and supermarkets.
Britain's foreign secretary said the three countries will ban the import of goods from Israeli
“settlements in the West Bank, settlements that are considered legal under international law.”
While the move is mostly symbolic, it's a sign of how Israel is becoming increasingly ostracized, even by some of its once-close allies. International outrage, it is real, had already surged over the war in Gaza and has been growing in the face of rising violence in the West Bank. Recently, settler violence there has soared to record levels and Israeli extremists have repeatedly
attacked Palestinians as the Israeli military has stood by. The attacks have been condemned not just by other countries, but also by a growing number of influential Israelis. In an open letter published this summer, more than 200 people, including retired Israeli generals, intelligence officials, and two of the country's former prime ministers demanded
that the government step in to stop the attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.
“They said what's happening there is terrorism and that the Israeli government is "knowingly”
complicit." In response to questions from the times about the letter, the Israeli Prime Minister's office declined to address those accusations. Yesterday, Israel did respond forcefully to the sanctions announcement, saying it would close the British consulate in East Jerusalem.
Back in the year 2000, a mathematics institute laid out a challenge. It identified seven legendary, enormously complex, unsolved math problems and said it would
award $1 million to anyone who could crack them. They were dubbed the Millennium Problems,
and the whole challenge was designed to push the world's leading mathematicians to new heights. Yesterday, open AI announced that its AI technology has solved one of them. The tech giants said that one of its latest models cracked what's known as the Navier Stokes Problem, which relates to the movement of water and other fluids. Open AI said its model solved it in just 88 hours, with as many as 10,000 AI agents working
in concert. As a side note, running that amount of AI systems likely cost millions of dollars. In the math world, some experts are excited about the breakthrough, while others are urging caution about turning over the biggest problems in math to AI. In an interview with the times, one mathematician at UCLA, who's widely regarded as one
of the world's leading mathematicians, warned that using AI to solve problems like this could weaken humans understanding of math. He said that working at and puzzling through intensely difficult problems teaches you something, comparing it to going to the gym to lift weights. He said that if you let AI do it, "It's like having machines that can lift weights for you."
And finally, AI might be out there with its fancy math pulling a goodwill hunting. But when it comes to house hunting, sorry, how to do it, it's causing some issues. More and more listings for houses and apartments are relying on AI to do virtual staging. Instead of having to move in nice looking furniture or asking a tenant to clean up, you just have AI reimagine the space and post those altered images.
Digital state listings have of course used tools like Photoshop to just things up for a long time. But some people say that the AI boom is going too far, adding lots of natural light, which
is never actually going to pour through those windows, or upgrading the bathroom fixtures,
redoing the kitchen cabinets. It's raising concerns about false advertising. Things have gotten to the point that some cities and states are moving to crack down on deceptive AI real estate images, California and Wisconsin have past laws requiring real estate agents to disclose when they use AI to significantly alter listings.
And other states are considering that kind of rule too. One thing to keep an eye out for if you are house hunting and wondering if the photos
“are too good to be true, you should look for a fireplace.”
For some reason, AI keeps adding fireplaces, they're showing up in listing after listing in houses that definitely don't have fireplaces. After one condolesting, when up in Portland, Oregon, showing some cozy flickering flames, the broker added a disclaimer, saying that the fireplace wasn't real. He told the Times quote, "The AI thought we should put a fire in there."
Those are the headlines.
Today on the daily, my colleague Nick Korsenidi explains President Trump's war on mail-in
“voting and how it sent some states scrambling ahead of the midterms.”
What these states are fearing is that the president and his administration are going
to do something that they're well known for.
“Racing beyond the legal bounds and trying to implement as much of this executive order”
as they can before any legal disputes are settled.
You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts.
“And if you are not a Times subscriber yet, you can get a full month of free access to everything”
we publish when you download the Times app now. I'm Tracy Munkford, we'll be back tomorrow.
