Tucker Carlson CRUSHES Israeli TV Host Live!

Come see me in Raleigh, Spokane, Tacoma, Levittown, Rosemot, Chicago.

Also, we're having our panels show with celebrity guests June 19th at the Starlight Cabaret. Get it there already buying tickets. It's on Ventura Boulevard. It's right by sushi row in studio city.

I'll see you there, only a hundred tickets go and fast. Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets. There's already a link. [MUSIC] Tucker Carlson had an interview, Kurt.

I don't know if you know this with an Israeli reporter journalist on TV in Israel. Tucker just gave a master class in the den of Zionist Hasbra, the anchor he used every Zionist talking point anti-Semitism, self-defense, even protocols of the elders of Zion and Tucker calmly dismantled it all. So let's watch a little bit.

I got a couple clips in the in the chamber, let's listen.

“So Israel is the most violent state in the world even more than Iran?”

Yeah. Are you serious? No country, and I say this with sadness, but no country has boasted more about killing its political opponents than Israel. Of course, about its assassination programs, the Prime Minister of Israel gave a golden

pager to the president of the United States, I was there, and that golden pager represented the pagers that has both our leaders were killed by. Sure. So yes, Israel brags about assassinating people, and of course it does assassinate people. Many countries assassinate people, but Israel makes a public relations campaign out of boasting

about killing its opponents. So yes, by definition. This people that were killed are the terrorist of his balan, that had a plan to eliminate Israel. In fact, when you said you were against the war in Iran, Iran is the creator of the fire

ring around Israel through Hamas and his balan, trying to eliminate Israel. So don't you think that Israel has the right of self-defense, which is one of the major pillars of interest, of national security in Israel, and also in the United States? Of course, I think Israel has the right of self-defense. So you're afraid about the pager, the golden pager, something that is wrong, isn't it

“the fact that you, when you fighting your enemies, you need to kill them first, sometimes?”

There may be circumstances where you can justify killing someone preemptively, and just to restate Israel, like the United States, like Burundi, like France, like every nation, like every person, has the right of self-defense. That's an inherent right.

So I've never questioned that, I support it.

The question that I think is worth discussing is what does that mean? Killing innocence is never acceptable. Period. Under any circumstances by any person or any nation, it's immoral. It's the thing that separates the civilized from the barbarous.

And you can line up killing people. Like Hamas, they, yeah. Of course, October 7th. Right. And this is a defense of Israel's enemies, of course not.

It's a blanket universal principle. It sounds like, of course, it's not. It's a universal principle that applies to every person and every nation. Now, that is not an attack on Israel. Israel has to in order to remain a considered civilized nation, abide by the same universal

principles everybody else does. If Hamas does something that's bad, it's bad. That does not justify Israel doing that same bad thing, or the United States doing that same bad thing, or anybody doing that same bad thing. So the principle remains to say, you can't kill people who did nothing wrong.

It's not just bad. You know, I'm going back to October 7th. This was a message that was attack on Israel, about innocent, about women, raping women, kidnapping. Okay.

So again, he's just lying. There was no, there was no S.C. ex assaults that was all made up. So that, of course, there's Zionists cannot debate without lies. That's all they have, because they don't have any, because they, they are immoral. They're genociders, they're the terrorists.

And so when they debate you, they have to use lies. And that's what that was more of. And he's just confessing that they do everything bad, everything bad, that there is that you could do. And because they have the right to defend themselves from other people defending themselves

from Israel. Considering all the orchestra, to consider all the orchestrated walls of the 20th century. J.F.K. RFK, 9/11, America's the most attack nation in the world. Anyway, let's get by, why did say something, Kurt?

Whenever you debate somebody with this, especially is really what they always end up falling

back on his game theory for some reason.

“Like, would you know, game theory, because somehow that justifies this?”

I swear to God, I've, every single time, is that what Brett Weinstein said to you?

Like, I could think of three times off top of my head. Oh, one guy wanted to be on here, a guy who I'm friendly with, obviously something comic. Because would you ever stay in game theory? Is what the day we covered the story where they were eating food in front of those starving kids to make them, to torture them?

Yeah. Yeah. And there's like 40 more videos like that.

So I was kind of upset about it, I'd never seen anything like that, because it's pretty

dark. And he says, well, you need some game theory.

“And I was like, you should go on a wood ship or if you study game theory.”

That's how I feel about game theorists. How about having a moral compass? Is that I'm not obviously leaving him in? What do you mean? Okay.

I know I believe him. Wow. Yeah. Like, I'm just saying, I was going to think game theory is like a moral justification because like you did some fucking nerd math, it says you go blow up kids, go, I really

fuck yourself. Okay. Here we go. Infants, take them to the tunnels for long months inside Gaza. Do you imagine what the United States would have done to an enemy that would have attacked

the United States and do the same in the same magnitude? Do you think the United States would have turned differently? Well, I don't, I don't need to imagine because we had 9/11 where many innocents were killed in response. The United States killed some of the perpetrators and also many innocents.

And so we've done that.

It is never allowable period for any person to kill an innocent.

You can't kill a child. The child did nothing wrong.

“And civilized people understand that that's what civilized people are, that's the definition”

of a civilized country. I agree with you. But it seems like, when you speak about Israel as the most violent state in the world, you forget to mention that it is the most attacked state in the world for so many enemies, no, like any other country in the world.

So if you don't put this equation together, it seems like we are doing it for fun, all that we lost our morality. This is self-defense. Israel definitely lost its morality. There's no question about that.

Of course, I do think and I would always say because it's true that Israel is many enemies, many of whom have committed atrocities against innocent Israelis, blowing up people and cafes and Tel Aviv as every citizen moral, as killing any other innocent in any other country at any other time. It's all wrong.

The reason that I have caused to comment on this and to say that it's wrong is that I'm paying for it. There's no reason the United States should be sending any money at all to Israel. And particularly not to its military. Even if the price will be the annihilation of Israel?

This is not your problem. Let me be clear, this is the morality that you're preaching for. Let me tell you what I do think, which is I don't want Israel to be destroyed. I don't want any Israeli to be harmed.

I personally have always liked Israel, not that that's relevant, but I have.

So it's not, I don't want anyone to be hurt in Israel. I just don't understand why the United States has an obligation to pay for any of this, to send the weapons for it, to lend its moral authority to Israel, to lend its diplomatic cover to Israel, to lend its Air Force and its Navy and its military Israel, I don't understand where does this obligation come from?

And no one will answer that question. And instead they say, well, you're an anti-Semite, well, I'm not an anti-Semite. All right. And that's not an answer. What is the answer?

And I've never received one. And I know now because of this war that America's relationship with Israel while it may be based on good intentions is hurting the United States very badly, very badly. We can't afford it. And our standing in the world has declined to be implicated in some of the many crimes Israel

has committed. Why? Why is it about it? But I have a question. Please tell me.

You have a question, Nathaniel, of dragging Trump into an unnecessary war with Iran. So let's think about what it actually means. Do you really think that a foreign leader can pull the president of the United States into a war it didn't want? And what does it tell us about Trump?

Is it really that weak? Well, I don't think that that can happen. I saw it happen. That was there. And so that happened.

So the question. I just love the work. He thought he had him recorded because he didn't really think, I don't have to think that happened. It happened.

I saw it happen. Go blackmail stupid. You forgot about the star of Epstein on your flag. More on. That was there.

And so that happened. So the question is why? And I just want to be clear.

“I don't primarily blame the Israeli Prime Minister who I think is wrong.”

I think he's gravely hurt Israel. I think he's leading Israel toward destruction. I think he's a very bad leader and a very unwise leader. However, I also believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu is acting in what he thinks is his nation's best interest.

So I give him credit for that and always have. I don't blame him primarily. I blame Donald Trump for folding under the pressure from Benjamin Netanyahu and his many allies in the United States. Donors to Donald Trump, people in the media class here, were effectively working on

behalf of the Israeli government and Donald Trump whose decision it was, caved under that pressure. But on February 28, the United States followed Israel into this war. And the Secretary of State of the United States said, we had no choice. They chose the time.

These really Prime Minister decided when they started. Well, that's the definition of control. He had control of this war. And so my question is, why did Donald Trump allow a nation of 9 million people to pull the United States a nation of 350 million people into a war that will change its future?

And this bad for the United States. And I can't answer that question.

I don't have an answer. What's your plan?

“Like Donald Trump is so weak that the foreign leader can drag him into a war he doesn't want.”

Well, I'm not.

Never in a deal with the hesitated and maybe afraid to say clearly that Donald Trump is

weak. Let me say two things. For one, of course, I'm not afraid or I wouldn't be doing this interviewer talking about this at all. He's just, he is, thanks for watching our YouTube channel.

Okay. Go ahead. It's so gweedowish how they are. Oh, you said he's weak. Like that fucking idiot thinks he really nailed Tucker by like, oh, you just a Donald

Trump is weak about your own president. Like, yeah, no, he's weak. He's a cannibal pedophile. I thought that you don't want to. Oh, that this, this, this, this, this is to Rayleigh reporter that does he give, my

lunch points for the guilt trips he's trying to use on Tucker?

Because those are those are guilt voyages.

Guilt journeys. That was not even. So let's keep going. Here we go. I mean, he just said it.

He just said Donald Trump was weak and that he followed him into a, do you think he's weak? He just said it. Well, I don't know.

“I think he's a punk of your president, you come back, what are you talking about?”

So there's more. Caving to Iran terror regime that controls not also the hormones, I love that Tucker doesn't let him get away with this calling is, it, it, Iran terror regime. Watch this. This is great.

I don't believe Donald Trump and I also think as it is Rayleigh, you should pause before

using a phrase terror regime, since you live in a country that just murdered thousands

of children in Gaza. We should hold back a little bit on the, oh, wow, so this is going out on Israeli television. That's the beauty of this. He's going on Israeli hit list for that. That will remark.

That's the beauty we stand for you with beauty. This was going to try to kill him like it's a small helpless child, he's a small helpless child. Oh, come on. And you know what the comedian say in America over this stuff, oh, come on.

Oi, I don't want to need trouble. Okay. Should pause before using a phrase terror regime, since you live in a country that just murdered thousands of children in Gaza. We should all pull back a little bit on the rhetoric, like, I'm not defending you.

But I'm just, I'm just saying, even the federal regime, it's a little, it's a little hard to hear that for the government of Iran's behavior is, in some cases, disgusting to me, and immoral. But the behavior of the Israeli government in Gaza is disgusting. In a moral, of course, Israel's not a democracy in any sense.

There are millions of people who live under Israeli control who cannot vote. Whoa. All right. Again, like, whoa. Look at the situation.

They got no country. I says they're going to see. They got no constitution. Even Arab has a constitution in their country, but it is real does it. They're not a democracy.

They're a theocracy. And you know what he said to me, it's more of a, that's not a democracy. That's not better. That reporter needs to take his research team out to the water and treat him like a, like, a flotilla.

If you know what I'm talking about, because they committed the worst act of terrorism to Israel, they made him look like what he actually is, a full demonic piece of garbage.

“I think he, this reporter needs to look to the best you there ever was.”

Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ. I used to do a joke about that. I told you, you know, they say that the, you know, the Jews say they're waiting for the savior to come.

He came. He was Jewish. And they still didn't accept them. You know, I'm from Chicago. We're waiting for the greatest basketball player to come.

He came. He was Michael Jordan. And we embraced him. Oh, shall I sell from this team? So here is herets.

On Israel, Gaza, Palestine, Bigmouth, Tucker Carlson spoke nothing but truth. This is in their Jewish newspaper. There it is. Well, they're falling left crazy, Jimmy, as anybody from Israel will tell you who's a far right crazy.

Uh, here's here, and here's some of that, what they said, what was not true in the interview that Tucker Carlson gave to Israel channel 13. He told interviewer, Udi Sagaal, that he was living in a country that had recently murdered thousands of children. What's wrong about that?

It's obvious that Israel is not a democracy in any sense as Carl sits and said, it's

So here's some, here's a little more, uh, here's the first two, uh, Glenn Greenwell tweeted

“this out the first two paragraphs from this article.”

So let's read it together, shall we? Let's read it together. It's been a long time since such an interview has been aired here. It contained only truths. There wasn't one word that Tucker Carlson said in a conversation with channel 13's Udi

Sagaal that wasn't true. It was the distilled truth, a perfect mirror, which is why it evokes such fure here. The eloquent American media personality proposed an alternative agenda to Israeli media. Speak the truth, try it for once. Carlson's truth is painful, shaming, oppressive, but it's the truth.

It was framed as an interview with America's big mouth with the Israeli hating anti-Semite, social media screamed that he shouldn't be interviewed. They were right. There's no place on Israeli TV networks for the truth, but Sagaal dared regrettably with some redundant sanctimoniousness. Bam!

It's crazy when they get sanctimonious with you.

Yes. That is really thin. Are you kidding me? Oh, there's just a lot of right to exist. I'll tell you what.

You go pay for it yourself. And if you can pay for it, then you have a right. Uh, Mike Maloy has a great analogy. Someone said, "Doesn't Israel have a right to defend itself?" And Mike Maloy said, "Uh, you live in Minnesota, right?"

So let's say I showed up at your house and I said, "Hey, this is mine now. You live there for a hundred years." I show up and I say, "Hey, this is mine now, get out." And I do it at the point of a gun. And you leave.

And you move down the street. And it bothers you and it drives you crazy that these people stole your house and are now living in it. And so then you show up and everyone sort of like you throw rocks at them and you break their window.

Because it makes you feel a little bit better. And then in response to you throwing rocks at them, they take out a howitzer and a mortar and they slaughter you and your family and your children. And all your neighbors and your boy and, uh, and all the right to do that. Yeah.

And does that seem right? Because that's what's happening. The definition of self-defense is being stretched really, really. Yeah. Self-defense.

In fact, it's being stretched in a way that no one in America could ever get away with calling self-defense. The thing is real is doing. There's no court there would ever tell, "Oh, you gave a fake exploding page of blue people's faces off their kids, uh, but I was just in self-defense.

How is that self-defense, by the way? They're going to want to kill you more now. It's almost like you wanted that way all the time, so you can expand and expand and expand.

“And if you want to hear my jokes about this, come see me Saturday.”

This Saturday didn't land to Georgia.

My one and only trip ever that land, I'm never going back.

That'll be this Saturday. So if you ever want to see me and I bring it hard, standing elevations every time we perform, we'll see you this Saturday that land and then we'll be in Raleigh. I don't even know if there's tickets left in Raleigh because we're proved popular in Raleigh. And then we'll be in Spokane, Tacoma, Leventown, Rosemod, Chicago, also June 19th, just added Friday,

June 19th, 730, we're doing a panel show, lots of celebrities. Who will be the celebrity? Will it be, will it be, will it be, who knows? Will it be Zach Alphanaki? Will it be Conan, the real barbarian?

Will it be, who knows? Maybe it'll be, maybe it'll be Lucy Kale show up and, uh, and masturbate for us. I think he would do that. I'm on his side. I defend that every time he asked for a consent to not touch someone.

So I'm giving him a consent. I defend him openly and forever on that. I'm giving him a consent. Yeah. I'm giving him, cause I'm consenting.

I, I would be an honor for me as well. It would be an honor. Yes. And it would be an honor for me to go to Reot and apologize to Saudi Arabia for America being a bad friend.

And I would like to still, I hope this goes out to someone. They'll book me on that fine festival. I got invited to Reot.

“I got a had a guy a week ago said, hey, would you be willing to go to Reot and tell jokes?”

And I go, yeah, but I got to say whatever I want, if they let me say whatever I want, I'll go. Until that guy will only say things that make them happy, because I would like to apologize for America on foreign soil as soon as possible. And then the guy said to me, he goes, oh, that's right.

Okay, no, I guess that wouldn't work out. We've got his hit me up dude because they will love what I say to them. Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show. You should become a premium member. We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week.

And it's a great way to help support the show.

It's the most affordable premium program in the business.

And it's a great way to help put to thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member. And if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. That's for your support.

So this is John Pat Horritz, who got literally took the job that his dad had. They called it. The Keaton was calling him lucky boy. John put hurts, yeah. Yeah.

“So it's no longer, what do they call that when you, what's it called when you inherit?”

Nepposia. Nepposia.

But we call him lucky boy.

And not in terms of his name or appearance. No, no, no. But he has blocked me on Twitter. He's one of those guys, all right? But at least he doesn't tweet about me like Dan Bajina.

If you block someone, that's fine. You can block anybody. But if you block them and then tweet about them, that you're a garbage person. It's self defense.

Doesn't he ever write the substance? That's never right. So here he is.

He's going to talk about the Thomas Massey election.

And what everything he says here, he's saying this in defense of Jews. But everything he says here qualifies as anti-Semitism according to the I.H.R.A. New rules. Oh, this is going to be good. Everything he says here.

Here is this guy, John Pat Horitz, thinking he's actually.

“So if there's, if you want to know what increases anti-Semitism and actual”

Jew hate this, watch this because everything he says here, while being true will also make people hate them and would be considered anti-Semitic if it wasn't a Jew saying it. So let's listen. I think it is a good thing if Massey and the people like him and others believe that if you cross, if you cross the line into anti-Semitism, Jews are going to use the power

that we have openly to go for you. And what is that power exactly? I wonder what that power is. Let's think with the banks in all the media. Is the media the bad of let's see.

As much because what other recourse is there? Are we just going to sit here and take it, beg for scraps? Hope that nice people are nice to us. The Democratic Party is going explicitly. Okay, of course, why wouldn't people be nice and helpful with the ones that are demanding

all their money and children? Isn't that how it's supposed to work? I rob you and if you complain, I threaten you. If you don't actually ask to the man, I blow up the world. That's what come on.

That's how repressive. Resopacity works as long as it works for me. Okay, here we go. Semitic, we can see it happening. People are getting benefits, as Seth says, for being anti-Semites, that seems to be part

of an appeal in primaries to the left and the party. We have to use what means there are at our disposal. And in my view, I'm going to put it that is Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean, but that's exactly what you mean.

We mean that Jewish billionaires put their money into politics and control the politics of America. That's what he's saying. He's saying that. If I said that, if I said that, if I said that, it would be anti-Semitic.

That what, that they put their Jew money into, yeah, Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean Jewish donors wildly disproportionate, not only charitably, but politically. But when I say charitably, I mean, nobody really knows the numbers. Jews make up 2% of the population according to some studies.

Jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually. There's a tenfold think about that, think about the disproportionate of that. And in politics, it's pretty close. So he's telling you that Jews are disproportionately wildly overrepresented with Jewish

“money and politics and why did they put that money in politics to control it?”

Charitable donations, what charitable donations, of course, for kids? Patures, again, if I said this, it would be anti-Semitic. If I said Jews make up 2% of the population, they make up 20% of the political spending

If I said that, it would be, I would be canceled.

They'd take down my channel and everything, because I'm an anti-Semite. That's what they would say. He's saying it. It's because only Nazis and Zionists can fight Judaism with this worship. That's exactly right.

Jews make up 20% of the charitable contributions made in the United States annually.

That is a tenfold think about that, think about the disproportionate of that.

And in politics, it's pretty close, also. And if that money isn't used, what, why did people give money? Because they want to influence elections to get people elected who reflect their views. Well, so 2% of the population takes 20% of all its political spending to control the politics.

“In favor of who Americans Jews Israel, that's what he's saying.”

And then, you know, the evidence is Trump didn't do any, well, I let you know tax on tips. Thanks. Thank you. Thank you.

This is an existential issue for Jews.

and by the way, look at the faces of the people. Look at the faces of the people, say they're like, and they're not interrupting him for a second.

Because they know if I say something, it's going to look really extra worse than it looks now. So they have to sit there and take a look at this, look at this check here, who's like staring into him, I mean, both are, but this one's like, are you kidding me?

“You're doing the thing that we're not supposed to do, you're telling the truth, this is quiet part. We're on a zoom. You're not supposed to say this, it's supposed to say this in secret.”

Oh, by the way, those rich, those rich Jews he's bragging about controlling all the thing, you know how they treat the regular Jews, like absolute shit. They're extremely racist in classes. Did you know that? To get people elected who reflect their views. Well, this is an existential issue for Jews. And the Jews who explicitly give money because they want to make it clear to anti-Semitic candidates that they are going to have to go through a buzz saw and that they are not going to simply waltz in and be, you know, be, if they're treated with kid gloves by the New York Times, we are double time.

We're going to do what we can to expose who they are to find out what we can find out about them that will harm them and that we will do what we can to, you're going to do what you can to find out what you can to harm them really like what? Like finding out there on the Epstein Island flight list, you mean, that should be a deal breaker, should it, right? Yeah, a little bit. How about live your own moral principles you supposedly have, you scumbag? I mean, I, I thought you studied Torah, you know, follow it. It tells you not to do this kind of shit.

“That's, let me place without stopping it if I can, because that's, do you have to hear it in it?”

What else could we do besides every stereotype, that's the only way on real John Putters, what a great name. I think it is a good thing if Massey and the people like him and others believe that if you cross, if you cross the line into anti-Semitism, Jews are going to use the power that we have openly to go for you because what other recourse? And let's remember what he's considering anti-Semitism by Thomas Massey. Anti-Semitism is, I don't think we should fund a genocide. I don't think we should fund the Israel. I don't, I think we should have the Epstein list exposed.

That's what he's calling anti-Semitism. I know Israel's guilty because it's anti-Semitism to expose the Epstein thing. That's how you know Israel's guilty. Right there, right there. Is there? Are we just going to sit here and take it? Begg for scraps. Hope that nice people in, you know, are, are nice to us. The Democratic Party is going explicitly anti-Semitic. We can see it happening.

People are getting benefits, as Seth says, forward being anti-Semites. That seems to be part of an appeal in primaries to the left and the party. We have to use what means there are at our disposal. And in my view, I'm going to put it, that is Jewish money. There is an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics, by which I mean Jewish donors wildly disproportionate, not only charitable, but politically. When I say cheritably, I mean, nobody really knows the numbers. Jews make up 2% of the population according to some studies.

That is a 10-fold think about that. Think about the disproportionate of that. And in politics, it's pretty close also.

“And if that money isn't used, why do people give money? Because they want to influence elections to get people elected who reflect their views.”

Well, this is an existential issue for Jews. And the Jews who explicitly give money, because they want to make it clear to anti-Semitic candidates, that they are going to have to go through a buzz saw, and that they are not going to simply waltz in and be, if they're treated with kid gloves by the New York Times, we are double time. Going to do what we can to expose who they are to find out what we can find out about them that will harm them, and that we will do what we can to prevent them from taking office.

What other choice does American Jewry have? Oh, I don't want any trouble. I mean, what does he have it? He's like, "It's okay, it's okay, it's okay, it's okay." Unreal dude, all of them, all the people sitting here I assume agree with him, or it must be second.

I mean, if they're facing, they look second.

And he looks second. Here's what Glenn Greenwald drew as to say about it. He said, "It's always like this.

It's real loyalists explicitly threaten US politicians with destruction if they don't support Israel because, as Norm Panhoritz, Neppo Baby or Lucky Boy, as Keaton and Grasse, Lucky Boy says here, there's an enormous amount of Jewish money in politics. But if you say it, you're an anti-Semite." By the way, here's another tweet from John Panhoritz, Trump bombed Iran. He can say Shylock, a hundred times a day forever, as far as I'm concerned.

Wait, but I'm doing a Shakespeare play playing Shylock, can I not say?

You remember this? You remember when Norm, was he named Norm?

The masters of the universe are Jews. That's, I think his name is Norm Coleman. Former US Senator declares in his own thing.

“I mean, if you want to remember the story of Moses, how big of trouble he got in for saying, we made the water come out of the rock.”

Because you're not supposed to say that kind of shit. This is grounds in your own religious texts to kick you the fuck out of Israel. I will cause a land of vomit you out. That's what God says. And he will. And he should. More from Glenn Greenwald. So here's a pack bragging that they bought that election. A pack all in all but admits to buying massive seed and Kentucky. But if you point out, point that out or said something similar, you're an evil Jew hating Nazi.

It's just so tiring. Glenn says exactly. A pack just openly boasted that they replace two Israeli critics and Congress with ardent pro Israeli loyalists. Now in the seats of Massey and Marjorie Taylor Green. But if you say that, a pack does this, the ADL and Jake Tapper will call you anti-Semitic. Jake Tapper, the former Hooters Lottiest who turned. That's right. So I didn't, Kurt, maybe you're aware of this. But they have ski wondered how they would treat us if we were only 2% of the population and they were the vast majority would they treat us well.

Meaning, meaning if, I guess he's saying if the Russians were 2% of the population and the Jews were the 98 would they treat us well. This is all Russians would they allow us to control their country if we were only 2% would they be kind and so hit any tweets to sell. It is not for nothing that over there in Europe, the Jews rule all the stock exchanges. It is not for nothing that they control capital that they are the masters of credit and it's not for nothing. I repeat that they are also the masters of international politics and what is going to happen in the future is known to the Jews themselves. Their reign, their complete reign is approaching.

What is coming is complete triumph of ideas before which sentiments of humanity, the thirst for truth, Christian feelings, the national and popular pride of European peoples must bow.

“I sometimes imagine what if there were not 3 million Jews but 3 million Russians in Russia and there were 80 million Jews. Well, how would they treat Russians and how would they loaded over them?”

What rights would Jews give Russians? When they turn them into slaves, worse than that. When they skin them all together, wouldn't they slaughter them to the last man to the point of complete extermination as they used to do with alien people in ancient times? I repeat, is it possible to conceive of a Jew without God moreover?

They all believe that the Messiah will again unite them in Jerusalem and bring by his sword all nations to their feet.

“That was from dusk AFC, the diary of a writer. Dusk AFC said that, I'm not saying that. That's what dusk AFC said.”

Well, these are the things, all these people are like, oh, what about the Christians? If you're militaristic or whatever, you're not Christian. So Christians are like, really are like maybe 2% They really are. Everybody else is like not a Christian as they are. It's all nationalism and nonsense and murder and war. And that blood and soil crap and they all, all these countries have a guy that's pushing that like their blood and soil narrative. It's a little gross for any Jews to be doing it because you know the thing with Hitler kind of, I would think we put a bad taste of you mouth for that.

Now, I would just switch it to, I would switch that to. Again, most of the Jews I know are just as disgusted, just like Glenn Greenwald is, he's a Jew. They're just as disgusted by Israel and all things. Israel is I am. So I wouldn't say all Jews. I would say those Israeli Zionists. And have the fact that they could winked Christian evangelicals into being Christian Zionists is the craziest they've ever. I mean, you're supposed to be a racer, religion is just not supposed to be a race. It's supposed to be how you behave. That's right.

As you can see, everybody says one thing, it does another all the time. We stand for you. Guess what Facebook's doing, Kirk. Facebook is making their employees train their AI and then firing them. So leaked audio in an all hands meeting on April 30, Mark Zuckerberg tells employees that he's training AI on them ahead of mass layoffs. Why is he telling them that?

Let's listen. There are also some updates this week around in a question around employee device tracking.

“So can you share more on employee device tracking? I think the way that it was announced left folks.”

Yeah, yeah. So, okay, let's talk about what we're doing.

You know, like Alex just said, going into what makes these AI models great, where there's basically a few key ingredients.

There's getting a research on the architecture good. There's having good infrastructure, just both the quantity of compute. But as important, if not more, it is also just how efficient we can use it, how reliable is it, what is the quality of that. And then the third piece, which is in some ways, it's hard to say that many days are more important than the other because they're all necessary, is effectively the data and what knowledge it learns. So, we're in a phase where basically the AI models learn from having really from watching really smart people do things.

And if you're trying to get it to be able to do certain capabilities, having it to be able to observe really smart people doing those things is very important. So, there are a few examples that we're trying to do this across the company because one basic insight and hypothesis that we have is that a lot of data generation across the field is done by these contract companies. And that helps as much. So, what he just said, if you miss it, I don't know why this is sped up, but it is. I didn't want it sped up, but it is act an accident, I'll take the blame.

So, what he just said was, they have AI watching people across his company. So, they could learn from watching really smart people that work at Facebook. So, then they can get rid of them, but he didn't say that part yet. There were smart, they didn't say that, Robin. Ha ha!

Of course, it's a round one before coming here. But, in general, the average intelligence of the people who are at this company is significantly higher than the average set of people that you can get to do tasks if you're working through the contract. So, through these contractors. So, if we're trying to teach the models coding, for example, then having people internally build tools that are or self tasks that help teach the model how to code, we think is going to dramatically increase our models coding ability faster than what others in the industry have the capability to do,

who don't have thousands and thousands of extremely strong engineers in their company. So, that's one example. Another thing that our system... So, the people who are doing the coding right now, the super smart people at Facebook, he's got AI watching how they do it.

So, then the AI can do it, and those people don't have a job. He doesn't say that second.

So, if they're so smart, don't you think they would have seen this coming, right? And if they're so smart, they know the second part of what he's not saying, correct, Kurt?

“Um, I know they think they think like autistic, they're they're compartmentalized to never look at the big picture, just be really smart about one thing, and that's how you miss that you're training your placement.”

Hey, there's more.

So, that's basically the essence of what we are trying to do here.

We're rolling it out in a way that is like, you know, it's like we're basically we're not like actually no human or anything is like looking at or watching what you're, what people are doing on their computers. The content is sort of, you're stripped out as much as possible. It's like none of the data has been used for like looking at what people are doing or surveillance or performance track or anything like that. It's purely just like we are using this to feed a very large amount of content into the AI model so that way it can learn how smart people use computers to accomplish tasks.

I know this is going to be a very big advantage if we can do it.

“So, anyway, that's what we're trying to do.”

I think that they're going to be probably other things around the company where we're basically trying to list the fact that we have just like a very high quality set of people to teach the AI systems to do different things that we need to get them to be able to do over time. So, this probably isn't the last thing like this.

And, but I think this is like an interesting strategy.

I think that we want to see how well it does. At this point in some of my hypothesis, we'll actually be able to complete the loop to see how well these kinds of things actually improve it. If they don't, we won't do more things like it, if they do, then we'll probably do more things like it. So, I think that's the, that's kind of the basic thing. In terms of how we communicate about this, I mean, this stuff is tricky. I think we're, I mean, I think like what I was looking through the details of this, there's like all these things that we could do better.

So, yeah, I mean, yes, I acknowledge that we will try to improve this. The kind of core tension on this is that we want to communicate as clearly as possible about what we're doing. While not having all of the details of things that we think are going to be strategically differentiated and leaked immediately to the two competitors.

“And so, I think part of the challenge is like we're a pretty big company. If we post stuff publicly, it leaks. Some things matter more, they leak than others.”

Right, like if we're building something in our, you know, add system, for example, or our infrastructure that's like bespoke to us and it's not something that other people are going to copy. And it leaks, it's like not the big of a deal, right, maybe it's kind of annoying. I think we know that AI is like one of the most competitive fields, right, and probably a history. So, anything that can give us that can make our the quality of our thing better is generally not something that I think it is in our strategic interest as a company to lay out the details and a lot of detail.

Knowing the physics of the situation is that that stuff isn't leaked. So, I think you will have to, we're just going to have to navigate that. It's going to be a little bit different on a thing by thing basis in terms of how we communicate. But I actually think it is like not strategically in your interest for us to communicate everything like in all the detail that we normally would on this. But I think we need to try to make sure we get this right. And communicate enough stuff, people understand what's going on. So, this I think will be a continued thing that we're trying to navigate.

It's part of the complexity of trying how do we navigate running the company through what is the just this incredibly dynamic period. There's lots of things that I think people would like more certainty on that we have. Lots of things that people would like more details on that it's not necessarily. It's not that any it's bad for any one person to know but it is bad for weeks. And I don't know how we how we exactly navigate that. So that's that's the basic situation on that. So, Rushi says tech companies really normalize announcing 10,000 layoffs like it's casual weather update every other Friday whole lives getting flipped upside down so CEOs can say we're becoming more efficient on an earnings call.

“Yeah, that's why they let you have all that DEI gender crap because they're going to get ready anyway stupid.”

So basically if you're employed by Facebook, your spoon feeding a vicious animal that will one day simply just eat you.

When it's spoonfuls go longer enough. Well, also it's never going to come alive. This thing where it's going to watch really smart people do things. I just said the smart people didn't see the end coming for their job. So you see how that's not helpful to the AI. You're going to make more spurgs in the AI come on. You know, if I if I certainly was one of those employees would I train the AI well. I mean, of all these people have all this ingenuity and creativity. Why wouldn't they somehow come together and do their own techno revolution.

They're trained not to wink. So Jimmy, how do you know that he's going to use this to fire their employees? Well, guess what? As of May 19th, met as human resource chief has confirmed the company will cut 10% of its workforce tomorrow. 8,000 workers will lose their jobs via email that was sent out at 4 a.m. The math layoffs are expected at 4 a.m. last Wednesday. So here at this is real.

Uh, might as well start packing your desk and do a cardboard box the moment you get hired at Facebook because you committed the Cardinal sin of being born too late to have a long lasting meaningful job. But the IDF will still be there right and the CIA people, they'll still be working there. Well, they're probably going to be people for sure. But now you are disposable instruction booklet that gets read once and then thrown away. Hey, there's probably a YouTube that explains what you do with the cheerful you clearly playing in the background.

Ha ha ha. A plastic fork has a longer lifespan than you do now working for that soulless machine called Facebook and here is a less plastic in it than your taint. For AM layoff email, meta starts alerting 8,000 employees about job cuts and reassigned 7,000 to new AI power teams. Meta platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram has started notifying thousands of employees worldwide that they're being sacked.

An additional layoffs could come later in the year, Bloomberg reported citing folks people familiar.

The Mark Zuckerberg lead company had announced plans to cut roughly 8,000 roles globally as part of a restructuring aimed at reducing costs and driving productivity through AI lead automation. There it is, but don't worry, I'm sure the severance package includes a cool sweatshirt with Facebook written on it.

“Because that's what you want to parade around in, right? Something that has the name of your former employer on it as you get a job at the local car wash.”

Wow.

The announcement followed metas commitment of more than a hundred billion dollars to capital expenditures towards artificial intelligence.

They're putting a hundred billion dollars into getting rid of a hundred billion salaries. The day before Meta informed staff that 7,000 workers had also been reassigned to newly formed teams focused on AI initiatives, including products and agents metas started by notifying employees in its Asian hub Singapore. Employees and Singapore reportedly received emails at 4 AM. Imagine waking up to that, "Hey, you're fired. What? That's how you wake up. They sent you an email. They didn't even do it in person."

Wow.

“European and US-based staff are expected to receive word early in their time zone as well, according to an internal memo. Meanwhile, staff are being encouraged to work from home.”

Meta has just under 80,000 employees at the end of March ahead of the reassignments and layoffs, and in a memo which was reviewed by Bloomberg News, metas head of people, they call it the head of people.

And they said the organizations can now operate with smaller teams that are faster and have more accountability because they're spying on you.

And by the way, they can work from home, what home? Home's cost money. You know, that's money. The stuff you don't have to pay a machine. We, we're now at the stage where many organizations can operate with a flatter structure with smaller teams of pods cohorts that can move faster.

“And with more ownership, we believe this will make us more productive and make the work more rewarding.”

The memo said the restructuring AI for AI. I know the restructuring follows Zuckerberg's making AI the company's top priority committing the bulk of metas resources to it to keep pace with rivals like Google and open AI. They find every way they can do human as you now that you're in a pod. We've got to compete not what about China on top of all those other rivals. Meta has gone through waves of layoffs and recent years as Zuckerberg has pushed for increased efficiency and courage engineers to use AI agents for coding and outlight plans to track employees devices to improve the technology.

Zuckerberg even spent time coding his own AI power to assistant to handle some of his CEO duties like soliciting employee feedback. What he didn't want to read people saying fuck off Zuckerberg. Wow. Hey, you're fired as of this moment. Did you find this message helpful? Thanks for your feedback. The restructuring his left meta employees both frustrated and anxious. I bet more than a thousand employees have signed a petition addressed to Zuckerberg and other leaders of the company demanding that it refrain from collecting their data from devices which can be as granular as gathering keystrokes mouse movements and screen content in the effort to train AI.

Sorry, pound sand. Others have also taken a social media to post about how the threat of layoffs has impacted their work and morale. Guess what the machine doesn't care about you and when I say the machine, I meet Mark Zucker Jeff. What's his name? Mark Zuckerberg. I mean, he didn't come up with Facebook anyway. It's a DARPA thing. I mean, we're going to pretend that all these oligarchs are innovators. They're all puppets that are installed. The whole reason we have that fate meta is because the government wanted you to learn how to snitch on yourself all day long and it worked and it worked.

So this is just work goes from there. A former meta employee in a post on social media on X said, "My friends still still there are either just waiting, hoping to get laid off or extremely anxious because the job is their lifeline."

That's just a small portion of meta's projected capital expenditure this year, which could hit 145 billion and the additional hundreds of billions that the company anticipates spending on AI infrastructure before the end of the decade.

Tech layoffs hit 138,000 people in 2026 nearly a thousand jobs were cut every day. Look at that Oracle UPS city Amazon del meta Chevron Microsoft PayPal. Look at all the people that got fired.

Well, I hope no bitter x employee expose all companies secrets and stuff that can harm those companies. I hope they don't drone bomb those companies AI facilities that would be horrible. Probe the Sarah super pack. That's a guy running for governor here in California. Another investment in Zuckerberg's dystopian future of a world that works for him and leaves scraps for the rest of us. Welcome to welcome to the future. That's all these tech plastic looking tech people. That's all they're they've all been working towards this the whole time and they need to do it better than China.

Hey, this is Jimmy, who's this? Hey, hey, what's up, Jimmy? This is JD Vance. The vice president of American president Scott said the king. Okay, sorry. That was awkward. My bad. That was a weird way of seeing who I was. Let's try that again. Hello, Jimmy. This is Vice President JD Vance. Hello, Mr. Vice President.

“Now we're cooking with grease. No, no, indeed we are. Why the confusion?”

Well, Jimmy, sometimes things get thrown out of whack when the people who really run things show up and remind us who's boss. Uh-huh. And when that happens, we reminded that titles like Vice President are purely a massive joke. Yeah, like think about it. Vice president, like what? The penultimate president. Okay, who showed up to remind you of this? Who was it? Okay, who are we talking about exactly? I think I know, but tell me again. We cannot say their names because their names are beyond saying. Okay. Well, what did they do when they showed up? Oh, Jimmy, they ensured the most wondrous election results in Kentucky and elsewhere.

Most wondrous indeed praise beyond to them. Them who? Them who saw to it that Thomas Matthew and others who defied the powers would be defeated and would be defeated by the Trump loyalists and those who supported them.

“They're important. I cannot say much more than this device to say that there is an elite that is above the duly elected officials if this nation and they are of them.”

You're you're talking about the deep state. Oh, can be a break with deep state. Who are you talking about? You maniac. We're even getting your analysis read it. No, Jimmy. I'm not talking about the quote unquote deep state.

Simply talking about the on elected international stratum of wealth and powerful individuals who actually dictate how old affairs are covered and conducted deep state. Oh, them.

Yes, the them. Now you get it. And do the them have a leader? Well, in a sense, but he's too powerful to even.

“Hold on, hold on, hold on, Mr. Vice President, I'm getting another call. Hey, this is the Jimmy Dorco. Who's this?”

Hello. Hello there. Has everything going? Oh, hello sir. Everything is well. Everything is very well. Thank you for asking. It is our honor that you're asking if they if I may have the privilege of saying so. This is Jim. Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde, Joey but a full go. Yes.

It's whoever you want it to be. JD is everything taken care of. Oh, yes, sir. Mr. Massive will never see the holes of Congress again.

Because if trouble makers like Massive continue to infiltrate Congress, not only will I be upset, but the people I work for will be very upset.

“Do you understand JD? Do you understand what I mean?”

Sometimes I don't think you really understand what I'm talking to you. The people you work, the people. You mean Mitch and Marie? No, no, no, no. Above Mitch and Marie. Oh, my dear God. I'm sorry, but Jeffrey Epstein, aren't you dead?

Yeah, sure. I'm a ghost on the phone. Because I hung myself in jail.

Oh, what was I murdered? Which is it? Give me a go. I'm some dog. He about gives meaning to your worthless lives.

“Yeah, I'm calling from the afterlife. You want to talk to Elvis?”

Well, what are you then? Well, let's just say last night, I was able to catch Kevin Spacey's latest cabaret act.

Oh, how was that? I've heard good say.

I've seen better. I've seen worse. So you just got away with it? You just got away with everything. Not really. There's a lot of my assets. I simply don't have access to. And we're working on that for you, sir, around the clock. Thank you, JD. I appreciate that.

Look, I have to go. It's been a pleasure chatting with you, gentlemen. JD, remember what we expect from you and Donnie, okay? Don't forget that. I need to run now. I have some... visit as I guess you call them. Yeah. You could call them that. Oh, my. Oh, my. Goodbye, sir. Oh, wow, Jimmy. What a great man. So honored to be a part of a government that has subverted the entire justice system to protect him and his cronies.

But that on my tombstone. And anyway, where was I? Oh, yeah, Jimmy. There's no such thing as the deep state. Ah, there's no such thing as the deep state. Well, we just got a call from Jeffrey Epstein from Israel. He didn't call himself Jeffrey Epstein. I just called him sir. Only you called him Jeffrey Epstein.

“Your producer put up the picture of Jeffrey Epstein. We call that plausible deniability. You see how this works?”

Yeah, I do, actually. So it's so great to get a glimpse into the horrifying reality of how power actually works in this country. Look, got to go Mr. Vice President. I have got to show to do where we expose all this BS, so people can know what is really going on. Hopefully someday you'll all be sent to the Hague. Bye-bye. Okay, bye-bye. Have a great show, buddy. Hey, become a premium member at go to JimmyDork.com. Sign up.

It's the most affordable premium program in the business. All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McCray. He can be found at Mike McCray.com. That's it for this week. You'd be the best you can be and I'll keep being me. [MUSIC]