Luigi Mangione's Suppressed Evidence, Mackenzie Shirilla’s "Crash" Doc - "Positively Legal" with Mark Eiglarsh and Jonna Spilbor

MK True Crime Show, Positively Legal.

“It's hosted by Kelly's Court, OG's Mark Eiglarge and Jonna.”

Spillbore, take a listen, enjoy, and if you like what you hear, head on over to mktroucrime.com to see where you can subscribe to all of our True Crime content, or just make it easy on yourself. Go to the purple podcast button on your phone, type in MKtroucrime, and hit subscribe, and do the same over at YouTube.

Enjoy. Hello, and welcome to Positively Legal. I'm Jonna Spillbore, a criminal defense attorney, shoe-maven, and founder of Jonna Spillbore Law. Hello, everyone, I'm Mark Eiglarge, I'm a criminal defense attorney, former prosecutor,

I junk law professor, I have a pickleball player, and an all-round fan of my co-host, Jonna. Love when you add that in. Today, I'm positively legal, a judge has blocked major evidence from Luigi Manjioni's state trial, and we're going to discuss that, and the vial super fans sporting press passes outside a Manhattan courthouse.

And I am super excited, Jonna, that we get to talk about this Netflix documentary. It's a number two show in the country right now, it's called The Crash, and the accused who was merely 17-year-old at the time of The Crash went to prison, and we're going to discuss whether she deserved to go to prison for the amount of time that she did. We sure will, and later I already know I'm going to love this guest.

Jenny Burton is joining us to share her remarkable story of how she used incarceration as an intervention and how she is working to shape public policy. Talk about somebody who literally turned her life around, we're going to be speaking with Jenny later in the show. What a story.

All my goodness, what she went through from childhood to now, extraordinary, so glad she's on.

“Now, Jonna, it's happy hour time, you got a beverage, what are you drinking?”

I don't. I have a shelter, and the thing I want to talk about is not that happy, I got to tell you something. So what's the, let me ask you, when you wake up in the morning, after you get done with the pigeon pose and the worry and all of the stuff, but after you've been reaching out

to my higher power, yeah, after you do that. I do it. Do you turn on the television? Do you watch anything in the morning? No.

Why, you can't put it that often? No. No. No. No.

Why? Poison myself with all that bad news and stuff, the human race consciousness and garbage? No. Yeah. No.

Who would want to do that? Right. No. But I do every morning. So I have been, there was a story that I heard of the news this morning, four

left my house, that I can't stop thinking about, here is why. You do personal injury. I do personal injury. I know we're here, we talked about criminal offense, we do a lot of that. There was a story that is so bizarre that I have to, I have to share it.

So here's the story. Woman, 56 years old, you could argue, prime of her life, driving her SUV in Manhattan last night, parks it in one of the most traversed busiest areas of the city, Fifth Avenue,

Midtown, Fifth Avenue, 50 Second Street, Fox SUV gets out of her SUV.

Immediately falls into an uncovered manhole, I don't know, like the visual must be, like literally her whole entire body, according to an uncovered manhole. I hate when I do that. Yeah, what happened next? She died.

Oh, dear. Children. Oh, my God, Debbie, down here, bringing that to happy hour. Oh, my goodness. Listen.

This is why. I mean, it's just so bizarre, number one, like I don't even know how that actually is. Right. Number two, of course, it's, somebody's going to be going to pay, not that that's going

to help anything. But it really makes me wonder, like, what, I'm in the city all the time. You're going to be in the city next week.

You never ever think about something that I worry, you know, scaffolding all the time.

Do I try to avoid it? Yes, something going to fall on my head and take me out, air conditioning, that's, you know, that's happened. I've had clients who've had their air conditioning units fall out of their windows. Right?

You think about that. You never think about stepping outside your car into a whole, so big that it really sucks you up and you die instantly. I don't want to do the rest of the show. You've completely and thoroughly bummed me out.

“That's why to start my day with that and a news, I just, I couldn't do it.”

I mean, that's, that's, you know, it's around the age of me and my wife. And now I got to picture her dying because I don't know what, some city worker didn't

The house person, I have to say that, rude side entrepreneur is too much.

Might have removed the, the cover, I don't know, to sell for, for recycling. I don't know why that, why that got off, but somebody died. That's, that's just tragic. That'll be a problem. If somebody removed it, just in terms of liability, although I think the, the man

home is the, the electric company, conned, if somebody did remove it and conned, didn't have a notice. Can you imagine they're fighting on whether they should pay out? I don't think they'll do that, but that could possibly happen. But here's why you shouldn't be mad at me for telling you that story.

“You should, you should not be mad at me because now that I've told you this bizarre story.”

Yeah. What if it makes you think twice and saves you from falling into a manhole? Maybe I just shouldn't go to New York at the end of the week. How about that? Right?

Just watch, just watch, where you should be watching, where you're going anyway, when you're in, in the city. Don't, don't, don't. People who are like, you know what, they practice into their like this, but, but, but, but, but, but, but they don't look in front of them.

Yeah. That's also annoying. Okay. One other thing. Just one other thing before you go to New York City, just because my pet pee, when you're walking

on the sidewalk with your wife or your kids or wherever you're there with, no, you can not walk horizontally. Like, like, no, like a rock band, stay to one side because people like me, that is good around you. All right. Okay.

“Let's talk about the podcast by talking about murder like Luigi Manjoni.”

I mean, this is like the murder podcast, supposed to be positively legal, positive. Something positive, Johnna, you've bummed me the hell out. We're going to find something positive, although Luigi Manjoni, just when you think that

his group of fans, first of all, no murderers should really have fans, but we know they

do. Just be any more vile, we're going to talk about that in a second, but there was a big ruling in the Luigi Manjoni case this week. I'm not, I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

I sort of disagree with it, but I'm not surprised by it. You do. What part do you disagree and just, like, fill everybody in and then you can tell us what you disagree with. Okay.

So just to recap for those who are like Mark and don't watch TV first thing in the morning. It's not a pretty sting, eventually get around to it while I want to ruin my day. Yeah. So Luigi Manjoni, he has charged in both state and federal court in New York, in federal court for the caught on camera undeniable 100% murder that is on tape because he did it

on a busy city street before a convention and he killed a man named Brian Thompson, who is CEO of, I guess it's the largest, it's not one of the largest health fair companies in the country, United States.

John, I'm interrupting right away because I always get this question, you know, I would

have probably announced it the same way you did. People would say, oh, you're a defense attorney, don't you believe in the presumption of innocence? It sounds like you're already convicting him wouldn't tell people when they say that to you. I say that the, there is no such thing as the presumption of innocence.

I know that we talk a good game, but in actuality, my command, you know, when we're representing criminal defendants, we often have to prove their innocence. It's not called that, we don't say it out loud, but that's exactly what needs to happen. Even before trial, especially before trial, when you're negotiating a case with a prosecutor, who gets to decide whether or not there's going to be a deal in your case, by the way,

the prosecutor's the one who does that. But I just want to tell you what I tell myself and what I tell others, so I don't feel guilty, right? Okay. The presumption of innocence applies to the six or 12 jurors assembled in that jury box.

We want to make sure they can presume or believe the defendant is innocent before they hear the evidence. It doesn't apply to the court of public opinion. It doesn't apply to my office right now. It doesn't apply to this podcast, it doesn't apply to my house.

It applies solely to court. So we can open any time we want that somebody's damn guilty, particularly when our own eyes are seeing a video that we don't think was manufactured by AI, and we can say he's likely guilty. And if there's anything wrong with that, what to hell with you, we're allowed to have an opinion,

right? That's a good answer. And I will, I don't think there's no question that the video is actually real. And the video shows him shooting this man in the back, in cold blood on a busy Manhattan street.

We can talk about the presumption of innocence all day long. Right. But, yes. So it was suppressed. What was led in?

So now he had a state court hearing because his defense attorneys who are doing a great job,

“that's what defense attorneys are supposed to do.”

They move of to suppress some of the evidence in case, because if you remember, when

were suspicious that he could be who we thought he was. They overstepped basically what you can do without a warrant in terms of searching somebody who you who uses back to committing a crime.

Here's what I want to talk about.

I want to know from you, the stuff that was lit in, everybody's going, oh, all this stuff is out. Who gives a crap? What was led in includes the gun that allegedly shot the guy, his manifesto, if you're the prosecutors, the defense will call it a diary.

I don't care what you call it. It includes his thought process that these people needed to die, these types of people. I mean, it is so specific.

“How is this ultimately not a huge victory for the government?”

Oh, the government still has a case. Their case really to be honest isn't overly affected by this, which, so sidebar. The defense theories who are very knowledgeable and very skilled know this, right? I don't think they were expecting all of the evidence to get suppressed, right? And you're not going to be able to suppress the video.

So what kind of victory is it when just a little bit of a got suppressed, but the rest of

it is still ample to support a murder conviction assuming this case goes to trial or

they decide to plead him to something. But it's a victory for due process because his lawyer needed to file this motion. If they didn't, you and I would say they've rendered ineffective assistance of counsel, which he deserves. So you filed a motion, they went through it, they challenged the evidence, and what remains

is still to me proof being found in the exclusion of every reasonable doubt. It's still plenty, but you know, before we go on because I really want to get to his fan club, which has got my backup. Can we play? We do have a shot, I believe, of the judge rendering his decision in that motion.

Can we play? Is that one?

“I find that the search of the backpack at the McDonald's was improper, warrantless search.”

That the backpack was not within the media control or grabable area of the defendant and further the people failed to demonstrate ex-Judeman circumstances.

Therefore, those items found in the backpack turn was search, at the McDonald's will be

suppressed. However, the people have established that the subsequent search of the backpack at the station was a valid inventory search, and therefore the items recovered at the station will not be suppressed. So as to the sorry issue, I find that the defendant was not incusted until about 947

a.m., so any statements before that were not be suppressed. However, as Miranda warnings were not given until some seconds after 948 in the morning, those statements made shortly before that in response to improper, custodial questions that were not merely a request for pedigree information will be suppressed. All right, the remains of statements will not be suppressed as they either spontaneous.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, so look, this is a victory for our rights because for everybody's rights, right? Because even a murderer, they apply the constitution and it is a presumptive improper search unless there's a warrant unless you have some type of exception. In this case, okay, they found it at the police station, they were allowed to then search

it at the police station, but on scene, the things that they found get suppressed. Okay, great, just this was done. Yes? Hallelujah. Yes.

Okay. So let's move on to let's move on. Let's talk about it. Did you? All right.

“I'm going to put you on the spot because I don't know if you did your homework and watch”

this documentary. So good. Oh, we're going to move on to the crash. You don't want to talk about the superfans? Oh, you know what?

Let's do that. Yeah, you're right. We need to. I need to get upset. You're right.

Well, we really do. But let's play the shot and then we'll just get upset and move on to the crash. Go. Go. Yeah.

Right in front of me. That's all I want to say. Right in front of me. Mom. I said, I said what I said.

I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't need to know.

I don't need to know. I don't need to know. I don't need to know. I need to know. I need to know.

I need to know. The black money. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like.

I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I don't get what you're like. I just get a crazy.

All right. Let's go on. Yeah, because this I watch this Netflix. I'm documentary. I told my kids to watch it.

They all loved it. We talked about it over lunch. It's the number two show in the country. It's called the crash 17 year old. Her name is Mackenzie Sherilla.

She was 17 and it was July 31st, 2022.

Here's what's uncontroverted.

She drove her car that contained her 20 year old boyfriend at 19 year old friend, Davian Flanagan, her boyfriend was Dominic Russo. She drove that car approximately a hundred miles an hour into a brick building. That is uncontroverted. The question is the car.

Yeah. Right.

“So far, so far, John, we're on the same page, right?”

Yep. This is what happened. Nobody wanted to believe at first that this was anything more than a tragic accident. Maybe there was a vehicle malfunction. Maybe she was distracted and so it's not something as sinister as murder.

But after they analyzed everything. The car checked out. There was no faulty breaks, no bad equipment. They checked her toxicology. They did that.

They found nothing that influenced her driving. And ultimately, they found that she intentionally drove that car into a brick building, causing the death of her boyfriend and friend. Without stepping on the break. Yes.

The outbreaks. No breaks. Which kind of begs the question, doesn't it not like if you're intending to kill everybody in that car, that would include yourself. Right.

There's no eject button there. But the the prosecutor really went after her with the vengeance. And I'll tell you what. If you want, we don't want to really give away the entire show. If you watch the show, you're going to walk away.

I did with a genuine disdain for McKenzie. McKenzie, shrill up for a number of weeks. Just spoiled a little brat. Let's see what she did though. Let's come back to her character.

“But let's go to sought three and see what police officers were forced to view”

at the crash site. Take a look at this. Part 42. Brady, there's an occupant inside. Send us a squad now.

We got bus to window out. Send us some more units. Any more units to figure out how to eat out? No. How do you do that?

Very hot. This is not a fresh accident either. She's been here for a while. Brady, we got at least two occupants in here. No, let's move in.

Oh my god. Oh my god. Oh my god. Time's three guys. Brady, a three occupant.

No one's conscious. No one's breathing. I must sit window out. She's alive. We got to get her out.

Somehow. She's alive. We got to get her out. We got to get her out. All right.

Harble. Completely horrible. Okay. Every parent's worst nightmare.

“Now, but as you mentioned before, we watched that.”

Originally, I think people thought this was just sort of a horrible act.

She probably had a lot of drugs on board. She was probably drugged something that caused this. And they found shrumes. They found shrumes in her bag. But none in her system.

So I'm in her system. Uh huh. Right. And then, you know, I don't know. I don't think we have footage of this.

But when you watch the documentary. Her parents, her parents play a big role in the documentary. And while they seem like seemingly law-abiding people. When you hear them, talk about her. When you hear them talk about the crash, the accident.

You no longer question why Mackenzie Scherilla did what she did. Because Mackenzie Scherilla was raised by wolves. And that contributed to why she thought either she thought that she was, I don't know, beyond any sort of harm, whether she thought that she was going to turn

at the last second and just scare her argument.

I don't know what she was thinking. But I'll tell you what she's thinking now. That's a picture of her, um, at the end of the documentary. I saw very little remorse. I, very, little remorse.

None. She was out. Oh, no. She was, she was acting completely inappropriately. Like completely toned deaf.

And half of the crash. Whether she intentionally chose to drive into a building, which ultimately, I'm given it away, the judge found, because this was a bench trial in front of the judge in out of jury, or whether it was some type of accident that she was responsible for.

She was completely toned deaf and pissed off all the victims as you'll see in the documentary. Yeah. I do need to split hairs, though, for a second. No, I had slice, slice away, my friend. Even though she is unlike a ball and even though ultimately she is where she belongs.

I just had a little bit of a twinge, you know, murder in most states, including where this was of which was Ohio. You know, I'm not convinced that she was intending to kill herself.

“And that's why, because she is so selfish, Marf.”

Honestly, I don't think she intended to kill herself. And if she wasn't intending to kill herself, then what she was doing, how would she, how could she be deemed to be intending to kill the occupants if she wasn't intending to kill herself? I know. You're breaking up with her.

Her longtime boyfriend wanted nothing to do with her. I don't know what happened in the car. That's what all the victims want to know. What exactly happened? But we know he didn't want anything to do with her.

There was evidence that a couple weeks before she had said that she was going to do something like this. There was a witness who testified to that.

But here's what got me there.

Two pieces of evidence that convinced me and I think convinced the judge. One that was not in the documentary. It was in an A and E special. We have the clip. I asked them to put it together.

But this one was. Let's start with number two. The thing that was in the documentary. You see her making a safe turn. Very safe.

Very safe, deliberate slow. And then she halls ass. 97 miles an hour, no breaks. But it wasn't a straight road. It was a curved road.

And if she did suffer from pots like her mother claimed. And thus would have passed out like they tried to alleged erroneously. Then the vehicle would have gone off the road earlier. She wouldn't have been able to navigate that curved road until she got into the wall. That's number one.

“Did you want to respond to that one before I move to the second?”

No, you can move on. I'm with you. Okay. All right. Number two.

A police officer. I think it was a detective. Went to visit her in the hospital. Right after this happened. And they recorded what was said on audio.

And she has this conversation with her mother that sounds like pig latin gibberish. I want you to hear it. And then we'll get into what it was. Let's go ahead. Okay.

The line we're investigating is an aggravated particular homicide times two. I do want you to know that a lot of people are coming to us and reporting things. So usually usually the most accurate information we're going to get. It's confirmed. There.

Yes. He said he had a seesay. He said he said it's like. She speaks to her mother in a unique language. Yes.

He said he had a seesay. It's a gibberish or a distortion of the English language. It's kind of like pig latin gibberish. Can we tell the police I had a seizure? Can we tell the police something like that?

One of the first things that the girl said to the detective was instantly.

“Can't you just take my driver's license away for ten years?”

No. Can I just take my license away for ten years? John, did you even see that? Come on, John. John, two things.

Hold on one second.

Take my license for what?

She didn't do anything wrong in her mind. Bullshit. She knew what she had done. And the other thing was, let's just say I had a seizure. They were setting it up from the beginning.

Come on, John. That should abandon the, that's not in the Netflix. I know. You heard it here on positively legal. What plan are you from that?

You can create a whole little weird non-language language to communicate with your parents, who are well, who raised you. That's bizarre. Right. You know, it's, okay, one quick thing, and I know we're going to have to move on.

“But, you know how very recently, oh, God, what is the name?”

There was a kid who shot up a school, his parents were convicted. Oh, what? Yeah, I forget the name. That was out of the Boston. Probably.

Ethan Crumbly. Right. Right.

For the first time ever, we saw parents prosecuted.

Right. Tonduct of their children. We should see it again. Oh, not. The facts are different.

They had made the gun accessible. It was a whole different thing. And I didn't even agree with that prosecution. But to be continued. Yeah.

I don't agree. Preview our guests because I'm excited to hear from her. Oh, God. Me too. I cannot wait to be speaking with Jenny Burton.

She is a systems change agent and author of the Gabriel plan. She's going to join us. You're not going to want to miss her story. Stay tuned. We'll be right back.

Welcome back to positively legal. And we are so privileged right now to have joining us. Jenny Burton. She's a systems change agent. She's host of the modern America channel.

She's also the author of the book, The Gabriel plan. Jenny, first of all, thank you so much for joining us. We are extremely grateful for your time. Thank you. Yeah.

Thank you guys so much for having me. All right. So we got to start at the beginning.

And I'm going to go on record and say you never had a chance, girl.

I feel so sorry for what you went through.

“I know that that's what made you the person you are today.”

But let's start as a child. What the heck happened? Yeah. Arguably, it's exactly what was supposed to happen. So I was born and born for such a time as this.

And I was born to drug addict parents. I mean, in the long and short of it. And though I compared my life to TV shows, I've got how to different plan for me. And so how bad was it?

I mean, they were obviously not doing what they were supposed to do. But what were you witnessing in the household? What were you subjecting yourself to unwillingly? Because that wasn't your choice. No, definitely wasn't my choice.

My house was rated when I was four years old. My dad was taken a prison shortly after that. I was born on her life sort of cascaded into despair and destruction. I think it felt good to her in the beginning. Because you know, we're all building the plain as we fly it.

And so suggesting that my parents should have done something differently would suggest that they had a different skill set than what they had.

“So I think that they were functioning from the foundation that they were”

skilled in and fortunately when you put drugs, chaos, love and children in the same space, you get exactly what that kind of mixture would suggest. And you know what I got was a crash course in strengths really. And a real, real college education in the, I think the real existence of humanity without, you know,

the luxuries that we have been conditioned to participate in here in the United States. And so for a long time I thought my life was happening to me. And I didn't realize that it was happening for me. And today I had just had a very different experience. And you know, I'm so grateful for the entire thing.

My mom and my dad both died in the same way in which they lived, which was in, you know, the outcomes of long-term drug and alcohol abuse. And, you know, there are a plethora of things that go along with that. And like I said, I'm just grateful for it. We weren't there the ones who got you involved in drug use,

not just because of their behavior, but they actively got you involved. Tell us about that. Yeah, my mom did. She introduced drugs to me. I was seven years old.

And in order for her kids not to say anything, she introduced them to us.

And, you know, though I did not like the way that they felt, what I realized was that they provided an escape from the chaos that was very frightening. And, you know, eventually just like any other condition that we struggle with as human beings. They became patterns of behavior that provided me opportunity to, you know, move around in the environment that I was in. And they served me until they didn't.

Were there any good childhood memories? Oh, I mean, yeah.

“And let me just say, like, I think it's really important to know that,”

because outsiders tend to perceive addiction as just a place of desperation and suffering, arguably. People wouldn't stay in those conditions if they didn't provide some sort of escape. So, you know, it wasn't like just this terrible experience, the entire time. There were definitely things that were hard and very frightening. But, you know, yes, I mean, I have six brothers and sisters.

We got the opportunity to explore and be free. I mean, I grew up in the 80s. There was definitely violence and fear that came along with all of the life experiences. But, you know, I have a lot of fond memories that I can reflect on, even with my mom,

who was my first abuser, et cetera, et cetera.

You know, we grew up together. And just the way that I see it now is just very different than the way that I saw it when I was in the midst of it. I had an expectation for a long time for my mom to do something that she didn't have the skill set to do. And, you know, and again, I just want to talk about gratitude. I'm really grateful for it today because what I get the opportunity to do today is teach people how to live differently than their patterns of behavior, if that makes sense.

Do you know what I got to ask you? Sorry, Mark, I got to ask you something because your story is remarkable and so much different than people who suffer very similar to you, right? Not everybody breaks free from addiction and turns out to change themselves and change the world for the better. But you did. So, despite being addicted, perhaps at a young age and growing up in that kind of chaos, there had to come a moment or maybe it was a series of moments that truly changed the way you operated as a person.

“And is there, and I know it's not a secret sauce, but can you describe for our listeners can case somebody's going through the same thing?”

What is it that inspired you to change and come out of that chaos? In such an inspiring way. So, I've answered this question so many times in the way that you set it up just caused me to sort of have a different experience with how I'm going to answer. So, first of all, I was tired. You know, every single person I think in the world has behaviors that they don't like, the outcomes of, but they don't know how to change them.

I was just really tired. And, you know, I, the moment that I was arrested last time, I just knew that something needed to change and I realized, I realized something really simple, which was, I just have to do the opposite of what I've been doing. And, because I realized that I was the author of my story that the change was going to have to come for me. For a really long time, I had an expectation for systems and governments and providers to have the answer for me.

But how could they have the answer when they had never been there?

How old were you when you finally made the shift?

“Yeah, 40, I just want to say that I think it's really important to say this, law enforcement was a blessing that intervened to help propel that shift.”

So, I was 40 years old. OK, and you had been arrested how many times? And I say this with love, it's just part of your story, you know? Yeah, just so you know, my life is an open book. So, for a long time, I've walked around essentially naked on the stage of the world. Everybody knows my story. So, there's no area you cannot go into. I just want to say that right now, but yeah, I don't know. I've been arrested a lot of times. I serve three different prison sentences. I've done a number of different jail stays juvenile justice days. For a long time, though, I expected other people to, you know, give me what I needed to be able to exist differently.

But when I got arrested at 40, I was just, I was sick of it. I was sick of myself, and I knew that something needed to change. So, yeah, what did you got? Had you gone to rehab any of the times as part of any previous sentences? Sure, yeah, I did. And I just want to say, I'm just curious, what's the most amount of time that you're able to get under your belt? Because maybe that helped when you finally made your decision at 40.

And each of those times, I gather more information, right? So, what these industries do is they provide a one-dimension of what is necessary, which is separation from the destructive path.

“So, in saying that, it gives a person in the past, not today. It's a very different system today. It gave, or gives a person the opportunity to be removed, long enough to get clarity.”

And every single person that I've ever interacted with in any of these spaces, whether it's me residing inside of these spaces or me serving inside of these spaces, they start to develop a plan for how they want their life to be different. Now, I just want to say this, if a person is not practicing new behaviors, the likelihood of those behaviors changing when they exit out of the other end of those institutions, whether it's treatment, whether it's mental health, whether it's shelter, whether it's prison or jail.

If they haven't been practicing those behaviors, the likelihood of those behaviors changing is very slim. We, as a species, gravitate toward familiarity. We gravitate toward familiarity. So, when things get harder and comfortable, and you have absolutely no idea how to navigate or access things that you want to do to change, you're probably not going to do that.

And those are some of the things that I realized at 40. Mind you, I was searching for death. I was, I was sick of it. I thought I was a failure in all areas of my life.

But there was a different thing that happened for me when I was arrested and I became clear, and you know, and that's like there's this whole spiritual component to, you know, everything that's happened, but you know, I woke up.

“And that's what happens pretty consistently with most people that end up in these environments when they're not put on drugs. And I'm going to tell you that today, when a person is separated,”

they're immediately put on drugs, whether it's through detox, whether it's a treatment program, whether it's prison, they are immediately put on drugs. And when you cannot access the deepest recesses of yourself, because you are continued to participate and, you know, chemical escape, what happens is, is people don't ever find that place of clarity. So you don't believe in suboxone to reen people off of no, go cold turkey and then, yeah, I'm not zero tolerance, but I can tell you that I am abstinence based.

So when we have blamed the pharmaceutical companies for the problem of opioid addiction, are we all really so dim that we think that the pharmaceutical companies are actually the answer to the very problem we're suggesting that they created. Isn't there business model exactly the same? How does any drug dealer make money? Just like any business, the term customers. Right, they don't profit even some of the rehab. I'm a fan of rehab of a lot of clients have gone through some of them successfully some of them not. They tend to make more money if they have more clients and they have more clients of people remain addicted.

And I can you talk to this part of it and that is you just said, you were sick and tired of feeling the way you were feeling right the pain. I'm doing what you were doing and living the way you were living was just far greater than the pain of change. Well, if I get that, but how can a person you somebody else any professional get inside another person's head to make that switch to flip that switch because I find when I have clients who are not successful in rehab. It's because they are going through the motions. They're saying what the counselors want them to say they're just doing it. They're sneaking around behind their backs. They haven't been motivated. They're not sick and tired of feeling that way.

“And if we can bottle whatever it takes to change that in a person's brain, I think we have a lot more successful people who are rehabilitated. But how do you get there?”

Well, is that some really important things? First of all, our entire system currently has focused on long-term management.

So back in two that between 2013 and 2015, we had a massive shift. We've saw the DSM five change. Everything became diagnosable and prescribable. So when that is the focus and I can tell you right now, I said it on a federal briefing. I think it was the homelessness EO. It was either the homelessness EO or the treatment EO. I've got some friends in DC that are involved in a lot of this stuff. I do consulting on different policy step with currently the state of Tennessee's Department of Human Services.

But I was able to sit in on some HUD stuff too that showed the timeline between 2013 and 2015, which made a lot of sense to me because I was working in the behavioral health industry at the time. So we changed addiction treatment to substance use disorder.

The shift is to move everybody towards some sort of medication assisted treatment. So I just want to say that. How do we bottle that? Well, first of all, we have the wrong people of the table making decisions when you don't have lived experience who have overcome. I just want to identify that very distinctly lived experience who has overcome and not drank the cool aid and bought into this idea of industry standard, which current industry standard is long term management. You're not sick. I'm not funded. We've seen a lot of problems with funding and how funding is directly associated with these problems with people remaining sick, right? So what we can do to bottle stuff, which is what I'm doing inside of prison today. I'm developing a model that's very intentional.

“And we have to, when a person is removed and clear, are we ever going to have 100% efficacy? No, we're talking about human beings who like to change a way that they feel.”

But what we do is, during those periods of clarity, we assess deficits. So we take a look at many life domains of the individual who is like, you know, receiving some sort of service inside of these industries, whether it's homelessness, social services, behavioral health and incarceration. The model has to look the same everywhere. And what we have to look for are the outcomes that we seek. Not inputs and outputs of the agency that are serving, but the outcomes that we seek with the individuals that are being served.

How do we as a system equip and enable individuals to become the strongest version of themselves? Well, we have to first address from lived experience perspectives and engagement.

Because I'm sorry, when you have the 25 year old academic who just came from suburbia who has never once in their life had a challenge outside of what their parents could solve for them and we're sending them into these arenas, these doubles dens, which that's exactly what we're doing. We indoctrinate them and we turn them into these advocates that are progressing the very industry that is contributing to the destruction of human life. And that's exactly what we're doing across the country and any.

“Can I ask you a question? Let me just ask you a question. Is there any way that you can force change upon someone unless they believe their behavior has become intolerable to themselves?”

In other words, I watch these programs intervention. Most of the time I don't think it tells the story because a lot of these people I think, you know, relapse because the parents are forcing it on them or friends want them to get well.

You know, it doesn't the individual like you, you worked because you said I've had enough. How do you force people to get a detreatment? If they don't want it, it doesn't work. Does it?

Well, I bet. Yes, it does actually. So if there are 15 people that hang out in a house or live in the same place in 12 of them are mountain climbers and the other career exposed to these people for a long enough period of time, people acclimate. They're going to start hiking or something. They're going to start eating better. They're going to leave.

That's just the way that we function as a species. Yes, you can. You remove people from the destructive path when you're, and I don't know one drug addict that doesn't commit some sort of crime.

“We've decided that possession of narcotics that have the ability to kill people is not a crime. I think that's a stupidest thing we've ever done as a country.”

When we when your civil liberties and crotch on mice of liberties as a community member, then you have put yourself in a position to be removed from society until we address your problems. And so when that happens and we immerse people in an environment where change is actually occurring, we're going to have a much higher likelihood over time that people are going to acclimate to that change. Most people are using drugs and participating in certain behaviors because those are the patterns of behaviors that they learned and navigate those environments.

People want to have integrity. They want to have self respect. Again, are we going to have a hundred percent efficacy? No, but this is what I can tell you. I teach a process inside of prisons and my current numbers are really solid out of 51 people that have been released only one has recidivated out of that one that's recidivated. He has made his way back to the program because though we participate in familiarity in behaviors that have helped us to escape challenge in the past. What we really want is we really want to be good people. We really want to be parents to our kids. We really want to have a job where we have autonomy in our life. We really want to have our own place to live.

If somebody is out screwing up and doing crazy stuff, it's all responsibility to hold them accountable. Whether it's jail, whether it's treatment, etc.

I want to ask you about that stat because that's extraordinary out of 51.

“And then he found his way back. Tell me what the formula is for the 50. What are you doing? What on a daily basis are those 50 doing to keep themselves off drugs and keeping themselves on the right path?”

Well, they've realized that the things that they were doing in our life were not helping them access the outcomes that they saw it.

The formula is assessed deficit, address deficit, teach accountability, have people recognize that they are the author to their own story.

And then once they have stabilized the internal foundation because our solutions are not external. The problems that we're trying to escape from exist within ourselves. So I've developed process and curriculum that I teach inside of prison and we rigorously go through this process for a period of time before I introduce them to real opportunity. I'm going to bring a host of network relationships from around the state into the prison prior to them releasing right around graduation. And what I do is I introduce the guys that I teach into relationships and opportunities so that they can sustain the goals that they have set for themselves.

And so it's been successful. Guys don't want to let go of the positive things that they've developed and they actually respect the guys that's looking back at them in the mirror.

A huge part of it when you're working this steps.

“I think they also like you incorporate the 12 steps into this. I'm just curious.”

No, but I mean, I am an I am a 12 step abstinence face person. So of course, I am also a Bible believing person. My program is people ask me all the time. Is it faith based? I said no, but it's based in faith. But so are the 12 steps. So what I provided is an opportunity for people to look at themselves because not everybody wants to go to 12 step, not everybody identifies as an addict. What I identify is change. I am a change program, the program that I teach is a change program. I also am a lover of Albert Ellis who is the creator of rational and motive behavior therapy.

So this has a lot of radical self-acceptance. You know, we've decided that, oh, my wife is supposed to look perfect. There's absolutely no human being on the face of the planet. That's perfect. Our escape really exists within accountability, personal accountability and self-acceptance. Like, I am okay. No matter what it is that I've done. And there's actually power in my past and the things that I've done that I can't ever get away from that I continue to try to hide from, but wherever I go there, I am. So is 12 step apart of it.

100% because 12 step is a part of me, but the process itself really has to do with personal accountability. Because we can hear from some of your students themselves, let's roll that. Nobody put us in prison, not the police, not the judge, not the prosecutors, you know, and the damn show not the victims. So, hey man, I'll tell you, you start taking accountability, you're doing wrong. You know, there won't be no change. You can't deal with problems until you name them and you know how to deal with them.

And all the other programs that I've taken, I never really told me, hey, this is how you should deal with this in this situation or whatever. And certain scenarios and things people are kind of private about, you know, they don't want necessarily talk about it anymore, you know, it's kind of feel like I'm, I'm at the end of my sentence, I'm ready to just be done with that, let's just move forward.

“The level of healing that I was able to give, I believe, from being an out that that helped me become a better person and help me see how others may view me and the way that I do things and how it affects others.”

I've seen even within myself, but for these other individuals, I have seen guys just, you know, take more approach at like going after the better things in life and and then not material things just the peace of mind, right.

I was actually in and the individuals that you may not see that don't participate no longer in out in a sense, but I'm going to tell you this, it carries on the way they conduct themselves, the way they help in the individuals and things that are nature, let alone the way they treat themselves. Like a lot of individuals that not only are in it, but that stick with it, their self-worth has definitely increased. They're not looking at their counselors and saying, "What are you going to do for me?" They're not looking at DOC and saying, "Well, how much money do you need to give me to live here?" They're looking at themselves and saying, "What can I do to improve my situation? What can I do to provide for my family? What can I do to provide better environments for my, my children, my wife, my brothers and sisters, my parents.

It's amazing to me over the years, how many times a guy comes to prison and, you know, he's got sick parents. And he only wants to do his take care of him, but he's stuck in prison.

And then he gets out and he has that old mentality of, "Well, what's DOC going to do for me?" Seeing that these guys are taking ownership in their own futures and really recognizing that they're in control of that.

“And not relying, so heavily on DOC to do it for me, I think that's going to make all the difference in the world.”

Jenny, I hate the fact that we have to rub up with you, but we do. I just want to say that so those people that you interviewed were part of your out program, which stands for overhaul, unrelenting transfiguration, which is incorporated into your Gabriel plan.

And I have to just tell you something, I have to tell you this. Listening to those men talk about how they transform Jenny, this would work for people who aren't addicted to anything.

The transformation within them is something that I think a lot of people, without addiction problems or issues. I don't want to, without addiction issues could also just become the best version of themselves. That's friggin' a myth. And I love you for that, and I applaud you for that. I would hope that people don't have to be incarcerated to benefit from your plan, from your systems change, from your wisdom, from your experience. If people do want to work with you and learn more about the program, is there a way that they can do that, Jenny? Yeah, well, they can email me directly at [email protected]. You can visit the website, ohyphanut.org. You can find me on social media at the jinyburton, and that's with Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

“And I just want to say, and I think it's really important to mention this, is that the population that you just witnessed, they predominantly become our homeless addicted population.”

The people that have been released are people who have been cycling in and out of incarceration for many years.

We're breaking cycles because we're focusing on intention and the outcomes that we seek. Jenny, thank you. We are extremely grateful for your efforts, and all that. That will call it horribleness, and I put that in quotations that you grew up around led you to do guides work, and I thank you for all that you do. Thank you very much. Thank you, Jenny. Thank you so much. All right, coming up in just a moment, jana, and I go off the record. Stick around. Welcome back to positively legal. It's time for Mark and I to go off the record. But before we get to that, there's something I've been dying to discuss with you, Mark.

And it's from my favorite movie. Oh, we all know what that is at this point. My cousin Vinnie. Oh, yeah. Thank you. All right, so let's watch. Let's watch a clip. One of the many and hopefully we'll show more during the season, but let's take a look at this one clip and we'll analyze just how real, how likely this is to occur. Go ahead. This is Riley, when you sort of defendants, will you win your glasses? Yes, I will. Over here, dear.

“I think that's all I was addicted to if you got to.”

I don't think it's over 60 years. Maybe 10 times.

Now, how far was it defendants from you when you saw a mentor in the sack of sons?

About 100 feet, 100 feet. Would you hold this please? Thank you. Sorry, excuse me, excuse me. Sorry, sorry. Don't compliment me. Okay, this is 50 feet. That's half the distance. How many fingers my old and up? Let the record show that counselor's holding up two fingers. Yana, please, huh? Oh, Yana. Sorry. What the hell is it you?

Mrs. Riley and only Mrs. Riley. How many fingers my holding up now? Risky. Full. What do you think now, dear? Thinking of getting thicker glasses? Jana, a great scene. I loved it when I watched the movie, but how realistic is that? Would you ever do anything like that in court? Please tell me now. That is worse than asking a witness a question you don't know the answer to it.

“It kind of, if you think about it in real life, it's sort of like the if the glove don't fit, you must quit like that whole demonstration.”

That was calculated at least. No, that was bad.

It made more sense. Right, bad for the prosecution for sure, but oh, Jana. No, no, it would never happen.

It's just, it's silly and and young lawyers who see that and want to do stuff like that, please don't. Okay, just don't. It's good for movies. It's not good in the real world. All right, we're going to, we're going to rant a little bit. We're going to rant a little bit.

Yeah, who's going first? Uh, I guess I am. Let's do it. Okay, you're in my rant. You're in my rant today, Mark. Really? Not, not in a bad, right? Okay. So in case you haven't heard, crime con 26 is taking place in Vegas next week and the whole group of

NK True Crime Contribes is going to be there. I'm really looking forward to it because well, Vegas, baby. I'm talking about giving you very, very good. Vegas, baby. My games are craps, roulette, and poker.

Texas hold and to be exact. Winner lose their fun to play and can keep you busy for a while. If the free Margarita is, don't make you stupid. But the most fun I have in Vegas is at the slots. The high roll and high risk progressive slot machines where you can burn through your

highest pay pair of legal salary in a matter of minutes. Or you can spin those wheels to win a ton. Or you can spin those wheels and win tens of millions of dollars with one lucky pole.

“Have you ever wondered how much of a windfall it would take to change your life?”

One million dollars.

My number, a hundred million bucks after taxes, of course.

That's what I consider FU money. And if I want FU money on this trip to Vegas, here are a few things I would and would not do. First, I would call my office and get everyone a raise so big. They would wonder whether I met and married Elon Musk in the Elvis

Apple. Next, I'd round up all my MK True Crime contributors and treat them to a sky's the limit spending spree at the shops at Caesar's Palace. Okay, so yeah, I anticipate Margarita goes turning me down. He'd be all along like I was just there with the Kardashians. You go ahead, I'll catch up.

After the rest of a shop till we drop, I treat my co-host Mark eyeglass to a champagne and waggustake experience, so luxuriously expensive. The prime minister of Japan would feel compelled to frame me on Facebook.

“But the most important thing I would do is not tell a single soul that I want.”

Not because I don't want to be bothered by my six cousin once removed hitting me up for a loan, but because I would want to bless as many people as I could without them ever needing to ask.

I got so behind on parking tickets that I had to ask my grandma to help me out

“before my car got towed for like the tenth time.”

Do where's my car? She made me a letter and a little bit of Joe. Not enough to fully solve the problem, but enough to buy me one good meal before I went to debtor's prison. The details of the note don't matter.

It's the effect that I'll never forget.

I swore that day that when I had enough money to be a blessing to others, I wouldn't fact be that blessing to whomever was in need before they ever had to ask. I've kept that promise to myself numerous times since then, and it feels pretty damn good. So when I win that FU money in Vegas next week, there's going to be a whole lot of people who will have my slightly frugal overly judging grip.

I'm out of thank for it. And then there will be Mark Eiglarge, who just might have the best beer fed, but massage cow, he ever ate. But massage cow.

“That don't you know that it's how they make way to go.”

Fabulous. All right, that was awesome.

Now I'm going to rant and I got to get serious for a second.

All right. Becky Hill. I'm going to say it again. Becky Hill. The mere mention of her name raises my blood pressure.

She was the clerk in Colotin, South Carolina, and she's the one who the highest court in the land in South Carolina found tampered with Alex Murdoch's jury, and just so we're clear, Alex Murdoch was convicted of killing both his wife and his son shot them both. And I agree with the higher courts ruling that there was plenty of evidence to prove

that he was guilty.

But what Becky Hill did was revolting.

She tampered with that jury. She had some good things to them like, don't be fooled by Alex. And this decision shouldn't take too long. She did it because she was promoting a book. And if he was found guilty, the sales would go up.

A book by the way that she plagiarized portions of. So I was very eager to find out when the news hit this past week that the convictions were overturned that they were now going to go to trial again. Very financial and emotional and physical tax on everyone. I was curious to see what did all of her crimes yield.

I mean, perjury, obstruction, misconduct. Surely they threw the book at her. Three years. Probation. I immediately thought the wrong P word.

See what she did didn't just screw with Alex Murdock and all the people of South Carolina and all those like myself who followed the trial and wanted due process. But she undermined the constitution and what it guarantees. We would like to believe that people are afforded fair trials. What she did she knowingly did.

She intentionally did. She willfully did it. And I think she got off way too light. What do you guys think? Mark.

Yes. Fabulous. Couldn't agree with you more. I'm outraged. I'm still upset by it.

I know. Very slap on the wrist. Absolute slap on the wrist. But for now, we have to bid everyone and do. I want to give a very loud thank you to Ginny Burton, our guest and to my co-host Mark.

“I thank you for joining us remember new episodes to positively leave all drop everyone's day.”

I hope you choose to have a wonderful week.