"The Double Life of Scott Peterson": The FULL MK Confidential Series

the least.

“Hey everyone, I'm Megan Kelly, welcome to the Megan Kelly show and today's Sunday”

mega episode today, every episode of our MK confidential series on Scott Peterson and

his double life. We will dig in to all the theories around his murder of his wife Lacey and their unborn son Connor and we'll have it out, a friendly having it out with our pal Mark Garagos. Scott's criminal defense attorney at the time and now he's working over MK true crime as one of our many brilliant attorneys analyzing true crime of the day in addition to his

daily practice. Enjoy and tune in every night next week for the conclusion of this inaugural run of our MK confidential series, it will resume but this is just the beginning. So thank you all for such a great response to it. You're the reason it will continue and we will be back next week with more.

See you tomorrow.

“New Year's Eve 2002 in California's Central Valley, a 27 year old massage therapist named”

Amber Fry is at a party with her friends when her phone rings. She has been dating the man on the other end of the line. They met on a blind date six weeks ago at a bar in Fresno. He told her he was single. He told her he lived alone in a big house in Sacramento built in the 1940s.

He told her he is a fertilizer salesman and that his job takes him all over the world from Boston to Cairo to Paris. He said he really wishes he could have pets but because of his frequent travels it wouldn't be fair to them. He has met her two-year-old daughter and picked the little girl up from preschool.

He has taken the two of them out to choose a Christmas tree. Amber Fry saved the cork from a bottle of wine they drink together.

“She wrote their names on it and the date.”

Amber, you're there, I can't hear you right now about all you want your ears. OK, I'll hear from you then. Amber, Amber, make your feet down. He is not near the air full tower. He is standing in the grass of East Laloma Park in Modesto, California.

Three blocks from his own front door. More than 1,000 people are standing there with him in the dark, holding candles and photographs of a woman who has been missing for a week. They are singing, they are praying, some of them are crying.

The woman is 8 months pregnant with his first child, a boy they have already named Connor.

Her name is Lacey Peterson and she is his wife. And as he tells her of the crowd in Paris, Amber Fry already knows he's speaking lies. The day before she told the Modesto Police Department everything she knows. Right now, in her hand, there is a tape recorder, two of their detectives gave her. She is recording every word.

I'm Megan Kelly and this is MK Confidential. Scott Peterson meets Amber Fry on a blind date. On October 23rd, 2002, Sean Sibley meets Scott then 30 at a pest control convention in Anaheim. And thinks he would be just perfect for her best friend. Sean thinks he's funny and good looking and Scott tells her he's single and looking for

his life partner. The best friend is Amber Fry, a 27-year-old single mother with a two-year-old daughter named Ayanna. She lives in Madera, California near Fresno and is looking and praying for a life partner of her own.

Amber asks Sean if he's cute and nice, her best friend says very to both. On November 20th, 2002, Amber arrives early at the elephant bar in Fresno for her date with Scott Peterson. A few minutes past seven, he walks into the bar, wearing a well-cut suit. He is just over six feet tall, clearly fit, and he lights up when he sees her waiting.

She had hoped it was him. He kisses her lightly on the cheek and says, "Am I late? I'm sorry, I'm late." He's four minutes late. The elephant bar is the meeting spot before they had to dinner.

Scott asks her if they can first run to his hotel so he can check in, shower, and change

out of the suit he's been wearing all day. Amber agrees and follows him up to his room. Before jumping in the shower, Scott pulls a bottle of champagne out of a duffel bag, opens

He returns smartly dressed and, as if he had forgotten something, grabs a box of strawberries

out of the same duffel bag.

“He drops one into each glass of champagne.”

Clearly, Amber thinks this is a man who plans ahead. They leave the hotel and go to a private room at the Japanese restaurant, Edoja, where Scott tells her all about his life. Amber is taken with him, and hopes they will see each other more, and they do. Scott meets Amber's little girl, Ayanna, who likes him right away.

He and Amber pick her up from school together. He even takes them to pick out a Christmas tree. Amber saves the cork from a bottle of wine they share, and wishes she had grabbed it from

that first bottle of champagne.

She writes their names and the date on the wine cork. December 2nd 2002, thinking this is the first of many. December 6th, Sean Simbly finds out that Scott Peterson is married. She calls Scott and confronts him.

“He denies it saying it must be a different Scott Peterson.”

Only when Sean searches county records online and finds Scott is married to Lacey Peterson does his story change. He is quiet for a long moment, then he starts crying. Scott, she says, "Are you still there? What's going on?"

I'm sorry he says, I'm sorry I lied to you, it's just I lost my wife, it's been very hard for me, I haven't fully dealt with it yet. Oh my God, Sean says, I'm so sorry Scott, I had no idea. He begs her not to tell Amber, I really care for Amber he says and I don't want to screw this up.

Let me tell her myself, I want to tell her in person, Sean agrees. At this point, Lacey Peterson is very much alive and living in Modesto, pregnant with

“their son, she is nine weeks away from her due date.”

Two days later, on December 8th, Scott Peterson starts shopping for a boat, something he keeps a secret. He calls about a lightly used fishing boat from an online classified ad in the Modesto B and talks the seller down to $1,400. The next day he pays cash for the 14-foot aluminum boat and its trailer hooks it to his pick-up

and toes it away. After his boat purchase, he visits a sport fishing website to find out what fish are currently in season and then Scott drives south to Amber Fry's house near Fresno to keep the promise he made to Sean's sibling and tell Amber his story about losing his wife. Later, with a tape recorder running, Amber Fry tells Modesto detectives about that conversation.

Scott arrives at Amber's house in Modera in a sharp blue suit with a rotary pin on the lapel. He is clearly agitated and says he needs to speak with her. He pulls two chairs around so they face each other and sits. Amber remembers hearing his stomach churn and that Scott was having trouble swallowing. He looked upset, almost scared, we're holding hands at the table like I'm listening, you know,

what is it and he said that he had lied about being married and at this point he's crying and having a hard time talking and said he had lost his wife and it'd be the first holidays without her. She remembers comforting him, understanding how hard it must have been. I didn't know maybe she'd die in a car accident and like there was all these thoughts I wanted to ask, but at the same time with his emotions, I thought I don't want to pry, he'll share with what he feels comfortable with.

Scott goes on to say, "When I meet new people, I act like my marriage never even happened."

Amber believes him. As he stammers, she interrupts. She's got for a moment there, I thought you were going to tell me you were married. No, he says, "No, no." So she asks, "Are you ready for our relationship with me?" He responds immediately, "God, yes."

On December 13th, Amber learns from Sean that Scott only told her about his supposed dead wife after Sean discovered he was married. The next evening December 14th before they leave her a party, Amber confronts Scott. "Can I trust you with my heart?" she asks him. "You already know the answer to that, Scott says, "No, I don't," she says.

That's why I'm asking. She asks him again and again, he gives her the same answer. The party is a formal fundraiser at the World Sports Cafe in Fresno. She is in a red, strapless gown and looks stunning. He is in a tuxedo, he rented that week.

Before they go, she asks him how she should introduce him.

"Are you seeing anyone else?"

"I'm not seeing anyone else," he tells her. "You are the only one I call sweetheart. I'm completely monogamous." So would I be safe to call you my boyfriend?

“She asks, "I think that would be totally appropriate.”

Don't you?" Amber smiles, yes. Amber says they have a lovely time. All night, she introduces him as her boyfriend and someone takes their picture. December 24, 2002, Lacy Peterson's stepfather, Ron Granski, reports her missing to police.

It is one of the few days Scott does not call Amber Fry. He's told her that he will be traveling to Maine, then Boston, then to Paris by way of New York, until the end of January. He gives her a post office box in Modesto to stay in touch. But Scott is still in Modesto, and Amber has no idea.

He calls Amber twice on Christmas Day, and she hears a woman's voice in the background. Scott says it's his mother. Amber wants to believe him, but has her doubts. Scott's behavior was starting to change little things like giving her a time he would call

her, which he'd never done before.

“On December 28, Amber's curiosity turns into action.”

She asks a friend, Denise Lane, to help her look up Scott Peterson on the internet. This was before the concept of Googling someone was second nature to America. There are several Scott Peterson's in Sacramento as it turns out, but nothing that seems to match. Frustrated, she calls Richard Bird, a friend and officer with the Fresno police.

She leaves a vague voice message asking him to return her call. The next day, Amber writes a prayer on a little slip of paper, and drops it into the request box at her church. She asks Scott to open her eyes and ears so she can see what she needs to see, and hear what she needs to hear.

After church, she goes to see her police officer friend, Richard Bird. She trusts him, and paints the picture of life with Scott. Whenever he calls me sweetie, she says, "I just melt." You know why he calls you sweetie?

“It's because he doesn't want to get your name wrong.”

He doesn't want to confuse you with all of his other sweeties. Bird promises to look into Scott and soon. He says he'll make some calls and nose around. That night, Bird calls. He has found a story about a Scott Peterson in Modesto whose wife is missing.

I'm not sure it's your Scott Peterson, he says. Keep looking, Amber tells him, "If you find out anything for sure or call me, I don't care how late it is." Later that night, at 140 in the morning, Bird calls again. This time his voice has changed.

Amber, he says, "You're not going to like this." It sounds like the same Scott Peterson from Modesto. His wife is pregnant, she's missing, and there has been a huge search underway for her. Since the week before. At 143 AM, Amber calls the Modesto Police Department.

She tells police she may have information about Scott Peterson, but she first wants to make

sure it's the right man. She asks them to confirm Scott's date of birth and they do. Amber can hardly breathe. She tells the dispatcher everything. She has been dating this man.

He is supposed to be on his way to Europe. Instead, she found out he is in Modesto, and that his pregnant wife is missing. She gives the dispatcher her name and number hangs up and walks back out to her friends, sobbing. "It's him," she says.

The next morning, December 30th, Amber sees footage of Lacy's family on TV. One of her friends shows her the website about Lacy's disappearance. At 11 AM that morning, six days after Lacy Peterson was reported missing. Detectives, Albro Keene, and John Bueller arrive at Amber's home. Amber and her friend Sean Sibli, who started it all, are waiting out front.

Inside Amber tells the detectives that 24 hours ago, she had asked God to open her eyes in ears. We get down to Amber's house, and her interview lasted more than an hour. Verified my suspicions earlier that he wasn't the person that he reported to be. Especially on that Christmas Eve interview.

"Do you guys have any problems with marriage problems?" Ali mentioned to her, "You were somebody that we were praying for. We were hoping to God that somebody like you would come forward, so it would help us with this case."

She has brought photographs, gifts, and things he left behind.

Her interview lasts more than an hour. Over lunch, Amber asks what she can do to help find Lacy. "You're doing it," says Bueller. Amber presses. She later writes that she felt Lacy Peterson was counting on her to bring her and her baby home.

The detective gives Amber a long look.

“How would you feel about taping your calls, Bueller asks her?”

Amber agrees to play along with Scott, as if she knows nothing about Lacy,

and to record every conversation for the police. Bueller described the next steps for him and Brachini when he spoke to me in 2021. And so we retriever a recorder out of my trunk along with like 10 tapes in some batteries, and then we went to Radio Shack, which was nearby in Brock, bought the connecting unit that would go to her phone, and the recorder itself showed her how to use them.

And as he's shown her, how to use it the phone rings and Brock and he goes, "Cash it, Scott's number right there." Amber puts in the earpiece from Radio Shack.

Her hands shakes so badly that she misses the first call from Scott.

“Bueller tells her relax, and that while she knows the call is being recorded, Scott has no idea.”

Amber then packs a bag and leaves her house to stay with friends. She does not want to be there alone with her daughter. Hours later, her cell phone rings again, it's Scott. Amber clears the room and tries not to panic. She reminds herself that Scott is in Europe, and she has to sound like she believes it.

She starts the tape, her palms are damp with sweat. Hello? Amber, hey, are you there? I can barely hear you. The line is full of static, but she hears him say he's catching a plane out of Normandy, and will be in Paris for New Year's. She knows this isn't true.

“I miss you, he says, "If you can hear me, bye."”

Scott is not in Europe. He makes that call from his own Modesto neighborhood. The moment Amber hangs up, she calls Bueller, her hands are shaking so badly, she drops the phone. I spoke to him, she says, "And I got it on tape." The next night is New Year's Eve. At East LaLoma Park, Lacy's family is holding a candlelight vigil. They call Scott up to speak from the stage and he declines, saying he'll watch from the crowd with his friends.

As the candles burn around him, with people praying for his wife, Scott steps away and calls Amber. Over the next seven weeks, Amber secretly records more than 140 calls with Scott. She does her best to keep him talking. So, what do you want to be together with me? Then Scott returns home from Europe. On January 6th, Bueller brings Amber to Modesto and puts her in a

motel under an alias. At the station, she joins Bueller, a criminal profile her on loan from the Department of Justice named Sharon Hagen, and Detective Craig Grogan. Lacy Peterson has been missing for two weeks. On the next call, they want Amber to coax some information out of Scott to push him to talk about his wife. Instead, he's got a bombshell for her. Would you talk to him, Hal?

I just want to tell you, tell him they're watching the news, Hal. I have not been traveling in that company. My husband likes you, but I've been traveling. I've been traveling for a while. Bueller, Hagen, and Rogan, write questions for Amber to ask Scott. Did you have a gun? Did you shoot her? Where's her body? And they listen, and silently cheer her on.

Eventually, the conversation fizzles and drops out. While they wait, Hagen, the profile

things. Every time he says the phrase "my God," he's lying. He's even lying about lying.

“Scott calls back, and the conversation goes in circles. When it finally ends, the officers”

commend Amber for her performance, but they are no closer to finding Lacy. Amber Fry starts reading everything. She pages through old issues of the Medesto B, the local newspaper. She visits the website, set up for Lacy Peterson every day, sometimes multiple times a day, and reads the outpouring of support from around the country for Lacy and her family. And through that reading, she finds Lacy Peterson's due date. It's February 10th.

Amber's birthday. At this point, Bueller is telling her she is done enough. Every time Scott calls,

Amber feels herself coming unglued. Bueller talks her down, but he's becoming worried about her. He suggests stopping the recordings and the ruse. But we haven't found Lacy, she says. I want to

“keep trying. On January 16th, Amber Fry's private life evaporates. The National Inquirer”

publishes photos of her and Scott Peterson together. Having gotten word of the story about to break the day before, Medesto police break the news to Lacy's family who had been supporting Scott up until this point. Eight days later, exactly one month after Lacy Peterson went missing, Amber's name is broadcast out on the radio and reporters are at her door within the hour. Police decide her best move is to make a statement and ask the world to leave her alone.

As Amber heads to the press conference, Scott calls again. She does not answer. She enters a room packed with reporters standing shoulder to shoulder and speaks into a bank of microphones. I met Scott Peterson, November 20th, 2002. I was introduced to him. I was told he was unmarried.

“Scott told me he was not married. We did have a romantic relationship.”

When I discovered he was involved in the disappear, the Lacy Peterson disappearance case. I immediately contacted the Medesto Police Department. I am very sorry for Lacy's family. And the pain that this is caused them and I pray for her savory turn and slow. Thank you. Lacy's family also addresses the press on January 24th. Lacy's brother, Brent Rocha,

says Scott has admitted to the affair exposed by the national inquirer and that the family is no longer supporting him. While Amber's statement is being broadcast, Lacy's mom, Sharon Rocha, calls the precinct, hoping to catch her. She thanks Amber for stepping forward and says she would like to meet her. The next day, a friend of Lacy's drives Amber Fry to Sharon's home. Sharon says she's hoping to fill in some gaps as far as what happened between Amber and Scott.

She asks a few questions about dates and timing and occasionally glances at a calendar on her desk. Meanwhile, Scott Peterson continues calling Amber. The date after her press conference, he calls to tell her how proud of her he is. I was so proud of you and you did that.

It was amazing. It's an amazing catcher. It's all over and through up when she is pride.

I was listening to this video. It was so hard to ask. But it was just so amazing. Your strength. February 10th, Amber Fry's birthday. Amber receives several calls from Scott this day. That afternoon, he tells her to drive to Valley Children's Hospital in Fresno and look at a lavender bush beneath a particular street lamp. Hidden in the bush is a paper bag from Trader Joe's. Inside is a small silver box decorated with a moon and sun, a silver and amber necklace,

a Nora Jones CD called "Come Away with Me" and a packet of wild flower seeds. There is a note in his handwriting, quote, "These seeds as your life are soon to bloom." In the parking lot, Amber Fry sits with all of it in her lap and cries. There is another candlelight vigil that night in East La Loma Park, 96 miles north. It is for Connor Peterson, Scott and Lacy's son, who was due to be born this very day.

A little more than a week later on February 18th, police returned to the Peterson house with a warrant. They pack up several bags of evidence and they impound Scott's pickup truck.

results to tell Scott the next time he calls. It doesn't take long.

“I think right now, some of you Scott, um, I think that'd be the best if you and I didn't talk anymore”

until there's resolution in this. Oh yeah, it's kind of great. It's good. Okay, Scott. Amber sets down the phone and waits to feel relieved, but she doesn't. Amber later writes that she felt talking to him was keeping the line open to finding Lacy. Now to protect herself and her daughter, that connection needs to be severed. She returns the recorder and the tapes to Bueller. Scott keeps calling and emailing Amber,

but the messages become less frequent and eventually stop altogether.

Two months later, on April 13th, 2003, a couple discovers the body of a baby along the north shore

“of the San Francisco Bay near Richmond. It's tiny, but it is unmistakably the full-term body”

of a very small baby boy. The next day, a woman out on a walk reports finding a female body to police. It's a gruesome and bizarre discovery. The body is missing its head, its hands, and its legs below the knees. It is badly decomposed, clothed, only in a bra and motherhood brand maternity pants but little of them remains. The press beat the police to the scene. Here's one Sacramento television station breaking the news. Just this afternoon, a badly decomposed body

was found near Point Isabel and Richmond. And last night, the body of a male fetus was found just a few miles away. Gloria Gomez joins us live in the scene with more on this developing

“story, Gloria. Well, this could be a major break in the Lacey Peterson case.”

The woman washes up on the rocks directly east of Brux Island, a nature preserve on the east side of the bay. That is near the area where Scott Peterson told police he had taken his fishing boat on Christmas Eve. The baby had come ashore about a mile away the day before. With no head to compare dental records, no hands to compare fingerprints and no feet to check for an ankle tattoo. It is suspected but not certain that this is Lacey Peterson and her baby Connor.

Authorities must wait for DNA to confirm their identities. Amber Fry hears about the washed up bodies in the bay and sobs. Then she writes a one-line email to Scott. Were those the bodies of Lacey and Connor? He does not reply. I'm Megan Kelly. Next time on MK confidential, Christmas Eve 2002 through two sets of eyes.

First, a husband whose wife vanishes without a trace, then the police who search for her

and soon question his "Every word." At 7pm on Christmas Eve 2002, four of Modesto police officers pull up outside a single story ranch house at 5.23 Kovina Avenue. The front windows faced the street but heavy drapes cover them, blocking the view in or out. A 27-year-old woman has been missing from this house since that morning. She is 8 months pregnant. Her husband says he went fishing, 90 miles away, and that he came home

in the afternoon to find her gone. Officer Matt Spurlock leaves the way up the brick walkway behind him, Sergeant Byron Durfeldt, is on the phone to the supervisor who runs a detective unit called "crimes against persons." I'm requesting the assistance of a captive-ser. Durfeldt says. Spurlock tries the front door. It opens. Most of the lights inside are on. There's a Christmas tree in the corner of the dining area. The officer's inventory, the presence,

underneath it. In the nursery, new baby clothes are stacked in a white crib. miniature cellboats hang from the ceiling. One of the officers stops in front of a life-preserver on the wall. It reads, "Welcome aboard." In the living room, a tan and white throw rug is bunched up on the floor against the patio door. Officer John Evers steps around it and leaves it where it lies. They work through the rest of the house room by room. Closet doors open. A shower

in a youthful script." On the counter, left over pizza sits in an open box with a container of

“ranch dressing next to it. And beside that, a telephone book, "Open." The police see a full-page”

ad with a photograph of a young man being handcuffed by a uniformed officer and underneath it the words, "Criminal Defense," former deputy district attorney. The lawyer lists his specialties. One of them is murder. Scott Peterson will later give an explanation for that, sitting in an interview room at the Modesto Police Department. He says he had the phone book out to

call hospitals. There are two accounts of that day, the day Lacy Peterson disappeared. First,

the way Scott Peterson tells it that night to a detective with a notebook. Then the same day, again, the way investigators will say, "It really happened." I'm Megan Kelly, and this is MK confidential.

“Lacy Peterson has been missing for a few hours. There is no body, nor even police must”

consider necessarily any crime. Still, the officers don't leave that house before securing it, and out at the curb, Sergeant Doerfeld calls his supervisor back with a list of six things that do not sit right. It has been less than an hour since police were called, and the supervisor wants a murder investigator at that house immediately. The detective who catches the case is Al Brokini, 17 years on the job. He'd planned a quiet Christmas with his family,

up in the Sierra Nevada Flitt Hills. After getting the call, he drives back down Route 108 toward Modesto, and the house on Kavina Avenue with the police scanner going on his dashboard.

“Brokini opens an investigation that night. He'll be with Scott Peterson on and off until”

one thirty in the morning. Their taped interview begins at midnight. Here's how Scott describes

that morning. Lacy is up first, and she has cereal. If she doesn't eat as soon as she's out of bed,

she gets sick because of the pregnancy. Scott stays in bed a while longer, gets up around 8 and showers. They watch television in the converted garage, her favorite show is on Martha Stewart. Scott doesn't watch the whole thing. He remembers cookies of some sort. He remembers they talked about what to do with meringue. She tells him her plan for the day, finished cleaning the house, mop the kitchen floor, take the dog for a walk, then the store for Christmas morning breakfast applies, and for the gingerbread

cookies she's making for the Christmas Eve dinner at her parents' place that night. He was going to go play golf at the club, but it seems pretty cold outside, so he decides to go fishing instead. That was the morning decision. In the end, because the morning was so played golf at the club or a good patient. She seemed to hold the sick off of the club, so

now it's decided to buy a third of her in that. Before he leaves, Lacy asks him for help with the

mop bucket. He tells Burkini what she's wearing when he leaves. Black pants, a white long-sleeved top plane, nothing written on it. No shoes. Her white tennis shoes, the ones she wears to walk the dog, are not in their usual place by the wet bar. He says he looked. Scott leaves around 930 in his pick-up and drives to the warehouse he rents on Emerald Avenue. I assemble a monitor. We're working to make tables. No, maybe it's all on the trailer there. Yeah, but yeah, I just got that so I assembled it.

Said money mail. They took the boat up and then. The email goes to his boss. Then he hooks up the 14 foot aluminum boat he bought two weeks earlier which is stored at the warehouse and tows it 90 miles to the Berkeley Marina. He feeds five dollars into the automated parking machine and takes the time to receipt. It reads 1254 in the afternoon. Scott's in the water by about 1 o'clock. He goes north a couple of miles to a small island with a

no landing sign on it. It's called Brook Silent. He fishes for about 90 minutes, catches nothing.

it ran. Back in the truck he calls Lazy as he's leaving the Marina and leaves a message on her voicemail.

“"The area beautiful. I just left the message at home. I do 15. I live in Berkeley. I'll see in a bit”

so you love it back." He stops for gas in Livermore on the freeway back toward Modesto. He hits traffic and calls the house again to say he will not be home by four. He stops at the warehouse to drop off the boat and gets home at 445. Scott comes around back. Their dog Mackenzie is in the yard and Scott is surprised to see he still has his leash on. Scott takes it off of him and puts the leash on the picnic table then goes in

through the French doors. The dog and their gray and white simies cat follow him inside.

The cat goes over to the mop bucket. Still sitting there full and looks like it's going to

“drink from it. So Scott carries the bucket out the side door, dumps it and leaves it outside.”

He puts his clothes in the washing machine. His jeans, his blue t-shirt, a green polo. To make room he pulls out a stack of stained white towels their housekeeper had left in there and piles them on top of the machine. He eats one piece of the cold pizza then showers, dresses, and checks the answering machine. There are three messages. Two of them are his own from the road.

The third is from Lacy's stepfather, Ron Gransky, asking them to bring over whipped cream.

This is supposed to be a celebratory evening. There do it Lacy's mom's house for dinner at 6 o'clock. At 515 by his own account, Scott Peterson looks at his watch. Sharon Rocha is looking at a clock too. She is Lacy's mother. She has a ham in the oven and she has just put a casserole dish of scalloped potatoes on the top rack. She's told everyone to come at 6. The clock by her stove reads 515. She finishes up in the kitchen and goes into the bedroom

to change. Two minutes later, her phone rings. Hi mom, Scott says, is Lacy there? No, she says. She wonders why he's asking. In Sharon's account of it, Scott pauses. He says, hmm, then he says the sentence that will change her life. When I got home, Lacy's car was in the driveway and Mackenzie was in the backyard with his Lishon and Lacy's missing. 22 years later, Sharon Rocha describes that call to Netflix producers. Scott called me to find out Lacy was at my house, and I said, no,

and he said, but since she's missing, missing, what do you mean missing? People don't use that term lightly. So I told him to call her friends and find out if anybody has seen her. It's the word that stops her. Missing. Sharon says later that it was a strange choice of words. Lacy's not the kind of person who goes missing. She's practical and organized and nearly eight months pregnant and they're coming for dinner in 45 minutes. Sharon asks Scott, what time you

got home? 445, he says. It's now 517. Scott's been home for more than 30 minutes before calling his mother-in-law to ask if she has heard from his wife. Within the hour, Lacy's stepdad, Ron Gransky is on the phone with the Modesto Police Department. Two weeks later, Sharon Rocha opens that oven. The casserole dish of scallop potatoes is still sitting on the top rack. She looks at them for a long time. Something else happens that evening before

any detective arrives. At 530, Scott Peterson knocks on the door of a neighbor across the street, Amy Kriegbaum to ask whether she has seen Lacy. Kriegbaum asks him where he's been all day. Scott tells her he was golfing. Down at East LaLoma Park, at the end of their street, Ron Gransky is helping search for Lacy. Officer Spurlock finds him standing at the footbridge

“and asks whether he knows where Scott has been. I believe he went golfing this morning,”

Gransky says, "Are you sure?" Yes, he answers. Later that night, on Scott's front lawn with two officers standing there, Gransky asks his son-in-law directly where he was able to get in a game of golf this morning. Scott hesitates and he says he did not play golf. It was too cold

way too late for fishing. He says he should have gone earlier. What were you fishing for?

“Scott doesn't reply. Burkini asks Scott why the truck is back then. Scott answers immediately.”

He always does that. He says because the toolbox in the bed has been broken into a couple of times.

That morning he had loaded a set of patio umbrellas wrapped in a blue tarp into the back of the truck to store at the warehouse. He forgot and drove to Berkeley and back with them still in there. Burkini asks whether Scott owns any handguns. Scott says yes. Alama 22 in the glove box of his truck, where it's been since a fescent hunt about a month ago. Burkini pops open the glove box. The gun is there and he takes it.

Burkini asks whether there was anything unusual in the house. Two things Scott says, the leash and the back door unlocked. Near the end of the interview, Burkini asks to test

“Scott Peterson's hands for gunshot residue. Scott hesitates. Benny asks, will boat motor exhaust”

register positive? Burkini doesn't answer that question but asks one of his own. Would you be willing to take a polygraph? Sure, Scott says. The detective asks a second time. Scott says he's certainly willing. And then Burkini tells Scott what's bothering him and hour into the tape. What concerns me the most is the fact that you're knocking home with a leash on. That bothers me I mean there. And a question. Yeah.

What concerns me most is doing anything I can to birth problems. I appreciate that. Burkini asks him where he wants to go. Physically Scott says back to my home. The polygraph is scheduled for the next afternoon. Christmas day with an agent from the California Department of Justice coming by to assist. At one o'clock as detectives are waiting for him, they get a phone call. Scott has changed his mind. He says his father Lee told him

taking a polygraph was not a good idea. Scott Peterson will never take a police polygraph.

Now the same day again, not the day Scott Peterson describes this time the way police and prosecutors come to believe it really happened. Let's start with what was on TV. Martha Stewart is on that morning, Lacey's favorite show and Scott remembers Martha talking about what to do with meringue. Detectives will pull that broadcast later. The segment about meringue aired at 9.48th that morning. Scott tells Burkini he left the house around 9.30.

But the meringue is Scott's own detail. Nobody put it to him, he offers it. And it airs 18 minutes after the time he says he was already gone, which puts him still in that house until at least 9.50. Next door neighbor Karen's service backs out of her driveway and finds their dog McKenzie loose in the street, dragging a leash so dirty. Karen goes back inside her house to wash her hands after she's handled it. I left the leash on the dog and abruptly just left and

shut the gate and went on with my day and I really didn't think much more of that until that evening. The next day when police take Karen's service's statement, they ask her to pin down a time when she found the dog. Using a receipt from an errand she ran just afterward, she works it back to no later than 10.18. That leaves 28 minutes. From the time Scott would have heard meringue before leaving the house and the time McKenzie was found outside barking and alone with no Lacey.

28 minutes for Lacey to finish mopping, load the dishwasher, make the bed, curl her hair, lace up her sneakers, clip a leash on McKenzie and head to the park and become a victim.

Police come to believe that Lacey Peterson never left her house alive. They cannot say exactly

when she is killed. They cannot say exactly how. Neither can the prosecutor who takes the case to trial. Here is Rick Distassau 2 years later in his closing argument. Quote the defendant's strangled Lacey Peterson on the night of December 23rd or the morning of December 24th. "I don't know. I don't have to prove that to you. Strangling and smothering is not going to leave a lot of evidence." There is almost no physical evidence in that house. Investigators have a phrase

“for a killing like that. I believe that this was what I call a soft kill. That he either suffocated”

her or he strangled her and there would be two reasons that he would choose to do that.

The night brachini walked through the house he saw a white comforter in Lacey and Scott's bedroom,

“pulled up over the pillows as though someone had tidied the bed in a hurry. At the foot of the bed,”

there was an indentation running across as though a body had been laid out there. Brachini does not write it down but he clocks it. Two days later on December 26th, detectives come back with a warrant, a crime scene officer photographs the bed, then they stripped the bed and take the comforter cover with them. Besides the indentation on that cover are two small spots. The spots are blood. Forensics will later confirm the blood is Scott Peterson's. Detectives come to

believe Lacey Peterson was killed on that bed. One theory they take seriously is that she reached up and scratched him as he was strangling her to death. Then Scott has to move her. Investigators believe he wrapped her in a tarp inside the house and dragged her out through the back door, winding up the throw rug as he went. Police also suspect Scott mopped the floor and deliberately let McKenzie lose with his leash still attached, setting up the possibility that someone took Lacey.

Here is the prosecutor, Dostaso again. "He wrapped her in a blue tarp and backed his truck

“up to the gate. He carries Lacey out, puts her in the back of the truck. Who's going to suspect him?”

Everyone thinks he's the perfect husband." Unquote. And that is what the umbrellas are for. Detective Craig Grogan, the lead investigator, will testify that the patio umbrellas Scott loaded that morning, were approximately the same height as Lacey Peterson. And that wrapped in a tarp in the bed of a truck, they would not only hide Lacey's body, but would explain what anyone saw him loading. Scott drives to the warehouse on Emerald Avenue. In his version, he spends one hour assembling a

woodworking tool and sending one email. In the police version, this is the hour Lacey Peterson's body goes from the truck into the boat that no one knows Scott had. Brachini is inside the warehouse, the same night, working by flashlight and the high beams of his own car. On the floor of the boat

“is a chunk of concrete with a steel loop set into one end. Scott tells him it's a homemade anchor”

and that the loop is there to tie the rope to. But there is no rope attached to it. There is also concrete dust inside the boat, not on the rim, but down on the ridges that run up the sides and across the bottom of the boat. The detective can think of no reason for that to be there. Two days later, on December 26th, the detectives come back with a search warrant, covering Scott's house, his warehouse, his vehicles, and his boat. Brachini looks at the

flat bed trailer more closely. On the trailer is a plastic water pitcher, the kind you might keep

in a refrigerator. It's about a third full of murky water with gray residue ringing the inside.

Brachini stands close and studies it. There's a mallet lying next to the pitcher. And in the dried concrete on the trailer are four circular impressions each one the size of the bottom of that water pitcher. Brachini works out what he's looking at. Ready mix concrete and water poured into the pitcher. Let it set, knock it out with the mallet, stand it on the trailer to cure. Four rings, at least four anchors. They have found one on the floor of the boat that leaves

at least three on accounted for. In the bed of Scott's pickup, Brachini finds a small tool coated in dry cement. He assumes this was used to mix the concrete. Detective Grogan asks Scott how many anchors he made. Did you make just one? Yeah. Scott says he made it days earlier. Mixed in a small

white painter's bucket, not in the pitcher. Detective see the pitcher, but never locate the bucket.

The police theory is that concrete weights took Lacy Peterson's body down and that the cement on those ridges inside the boat crumbled off of the weights as she went over the side. Beneath the boat's bench seat, Detective's find a pair of yellow needle-nosed pliers. There is a single strand of black human hair clamped in the pliers. Lacy Peterson has black hair. A Modesto detective bags the hair seals it and marks it to be sent for DNA testing.

There is no root attached to the hair, though, so the analysis does not give a conclusive match. However, it says the DNA is consistent with a hair from Lacy's hair brush and disample from Lacy's

Lacy disappeared. Scott Peterson makes a phone call. It is the last call he makes for about four

“hours. No calls on the drive, not at the Marina, not on the water. Police note this as a change”

from his normal behavior. He chose the boat from his warehouse about 90 miles to the Berkeley Marina. Detective's believe Lacy Peterson is in that boat. At 1254 in the afternoon, he arrives at the Marina feeds $5 into the automated parking machine and takes the time to receipt and keeps it. That night, standing in his own driveway, he hands it to a police officer who has not asked him for it. At the Marina, Scott puts the boat in the water and goes a couple of miles north toward Brookis Island.

That is where police believe Lacy Peterson's body is discarded into San Francisco Bay.

He went out to Brookis Island and he dumped her weighted body into the water hoping that it would never

“ever come up. 4 months later, on April 13th and then the 14th, the decomposing bodies of a full-term”

baby boy and a woman wash ashore directly east of that island. The rest of the day is the day you already know. Scott calls Lacy twice from the road and leaves excessively loving messages she will never pick up. He drops the boat at the warehouse and he is home at 445. The dog is in the yard with a leash on and he takes it off. He dumps the mop bucket out the side door. He puts his clothes in the washing machine. He eats a piece of cold pizza, showers, dresses and plays back the messages on the answering

machine. Then he waits. At 515, he looks at his watch and picks up the phone.

Hi mom. Scott says, "Is Lacy there?" In the first version, that is a husband finding out

“his wife is missing. In the police version, he knows very well what has happened to her.”

In the weeks following Christmas, police keep a close eye on Scott Peterson. They impound his truck and get a court order to put a tracking device on Lacy's land rover. When he rents another pick-up, they track that too. Scott goes back to the Berkeley Marina three times after December 24th and he does not take the boat with him. Surveillance units watch him sit in his vehicle near the boat ramp just looking out at the water. When he learns police are bringing in dogs, Scott brings the

boat's cover home from the warehouse and puts it in a shed behind the house. Then he sets a gasoline powered leaf blower down on top of the cover. The leaf blower leaks. Police note that Scott Peterson is not otherwise careless with his equipment. Burkini interviews neighbor Karen's service again. Afterwards, he writes up a list and he gives it a heading. Scott Peterson false statements. One, that police took his handgun from inside his house. Two, that he volunteered for a polygraph

and officers told him not to take it. He told his parents and service this. At least four times. Scott tells Lacy's mom Sharon that he's deliberately avoiding the press so the coverage stays on Lacy and that if he senses interest starting to fade, he'll give an interview himself just to bring it back. He calls a realtor about their house on Kovina Avenue and talks about selling it or renting it out. There's no way of Lacy comes back that we're going to stay there. He says. On January

11th, 2003, Sharon leaves Scott a voicemail meant to bring him relief. A sonar scan of San Francisco Bay has turned up something on the bottom. It's been identified and it's a boat anchor. It is not her daughter. The wire tap on Scott's phone is running while he listens to the message. As his mother-in-law's message plays, Scott Peterson lets out a low quick whistle.

Scott Peterson has a cut on his knuckle. The cut is not the problem. The problem is

Scott's explanations for it keep changing. When Detective Grogon asks him what cut him, Scott says he doesn't know. Probably the door, he offers or something. Grogon asks whether it was just a scuff on the knuckle and Scott says yeah, left hand, index finger.

Gloria Gomez. She has just asked him whether it would surprise him if police found blood

“in his vehicles. Take a look at my hand. You can see cuts here on my knuckles,”

numerous scars. I have work on farms. I work with machinery. I know I cut my knuckle that day, reaching in the toolbox of my truck and then into the pocket on the door. I cut out my knuckle and there's blood stain on the door. What happened to? He doesn't know. Sometime after Christmas, Scott complains to Lisa's mom Sharon about Brachini, including that the detective had checked his hands for cuts a few times, then he makes a point of showing Sharon his hands. Sharon glances at

them quickly and writes down later what she saw. Not one finger, but a line running across the knuckles of all four fingers, a cut or a slice that has almost healed. She says nothing. One Christmas Eve,

“two different versions. In Scott Peterson's accounting, a man goes fishing comes home to a quiet and”

empty house. Tosses in a load of laundry cleans up, eats a slice of leftover pizza, then calls his mother-in-law. To the police that man has killed his wife and unborn child, dumped their bodies in the cold sea and is trying to cover up his crime. The Modesto Police Department will spend the next two years trying to prove it, but there's a problem. There are witnesses whose accounts do not fit the police timeline. A van that doesn't belong on that street.

Three men in a yard and people who say they saw a pregnant woman walking a golden retriever that morning. After the points Scott Peterson had left. After the time police had concluded, Lacey Peterson was already dead. I'm Megan Kelly. That's next time on M.K. confidential. There is a van parked outside 516 Kovina Avenue that does not look like it belongs there. Late in the morning of December 24th, 2002, a woman named Diane Jackson is driving home from her

hand therapist appointment. Her husband is coming home at noon for lunch and she is thinking about whether she has enough time to make his food. She turns on to Kovina Avenue and as she passes the house at 516 she sees three men standing in the front yard. Two of them are at the back of a van

parked at the curb. The third is up near the house. All three of them stop what they are doing

and turn and look at her as she goes by. She pulls into her own driveway and looks at her watch. 1140 a.m. 20 minutes to make his food she can do this. Her first thought about the three men she tells police later is that they are landscapers and she changes her mind as she tells

“Annie. I drove by at, I think it was some time after I was living in the morning and”

saw this man and two or three people out there and I noticed it only because they noticed the lady. I felt like not yet workers. I mean you had workers. You'll turn it up their hand and look at you. When they're doing the yard work. The van is parked outside 516 Kovina directly across the street at 523 is Scott and Lacey Petersen's home. At this time 1140 in the morning on Christmas Eve, no one has reported anyone missing. Diane Jackson does not know she is a witness to anything.

She goes inside and makes her husband's lunch. On the Friday after Christmas, Diane hears that the neighbors at 516 were burglarized while they were away. She telephones the Modesto Police Department and tells them what she saw. A detective takes her statement that evening. Three men and older van

parked on the street, doors that opened at the rear. She first thought it was white. She says and

now she thinks it might have been darker, maybe tan or brown. Three weeks later, on January 17th, 2003, the Modesto Police Department asks Diane Jackson to come down to the station and there they hypnotize her. I'm Megan Kelly and this is MK Confidential. Diane Jackson is not the only person on that street who reports a vehicle that does not belong there. Around 920 on Christmas Eve morning, a city building inspector leaving 516 Kovina has to drive

gray primer and a crude wooden roof rack. Minutes later, a woman who often walks that street sees it

“too, though she's never seen this van before. An unusually long white utility van,”

no windows along the rear sides, parked in front of the same house, 516. She tells police one other thing, between about 920 and 940 AM, she saw Scott Peterson standing in the bed of his pickup truck in his own driveway. At least five people reported a strange van in that neighborhood around the time, least he disappeared. Several of the sightings are on Kovina at the same

hour Scott is loading his truck, but Scott never mentions seeing a van. Five reports with similar

descriptions, but nothing definitive. Matt Dalton spent 13 years as a prosecutor, most of it with a Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. In January 2003, he quits and goes to work for defense attorney Mark Garagos. When Garagos takes Scott Peterson's case, Dalton moves to Modesto

“and begins investigating Lisa's disappearance for the defense. Garagos rents Dalton in office”

above the J Street Cafe, a block from the jail. No phone, no facts, no copier, no bed. Dalton's leaps on the floor until something runs across his chest in the dark. After that, he sleeps in

a tent indoors. He reads more than 30,000 pages of police reports. It appears there was a van

that did not belong possibly connected to a robbery in Lisa's neighborhood when she went missing, but can this be linked to Lisa's disappearance? Dalton goes and finds the witnesses, knocking on door after door, making call after call. Six people have told the Modesto Police Department that they saw a very pregnant woman walking a golden retriever on the morning of December 24. Dalton interviews all six. None of the six witnesses ever testify. Garagos tells the jury in

“his opening statement that he will call them, but he doesn't. Dalton says he still does not know why.”

What the jury hears about these witnesses comes mostly through police officers, being questioned by the defense. And even then the judge tells jurors they can consider those reports, only to understand what police did with them, not as proof that the sightings themselves actually happened. Homer Meldenado and his wife Helen stopped for gas at a mini-mart on Miller Avenue, near the corner of Kovina, between about 9.50 and 10 o'clock AM on Christmas Eve.

Pulling out they drive west away from the Peterson's neighborhood in Tor Town. A few houses past Kovina, they pass a young woman. She is in his words very pregnant. She is walking a golden retriever and having trouble controlling it. The dog is up on its back legs from pause on her as if it were jumping on her. I hope she doesn't fall. Helen says later Meldenado sees Lisa Peterson's photograph and he is certain it was her. He doesn't know the family, but he finds her brother Brent's number

and calls him. On January 1st, he also telephones the Medesto Police Department. No one calls him back, so he drives down to the command post and reports it in person and is told that a detective will speak with him. Meldenado says no one ever does. He is the only one of the six with a receipt supporting where he says he was and when. Vivian Mitchell is at her kitchen window on Lassandra Avenue at about 10 o'clock AM Christmas Eve morning. When she sees a pregnant woman walking

a golden retriever, she's in her late 70s and she has seen the woman and the dog in the neighborhood before. She watches them for about four minutes, she thinks. And she says to her husband Bill, there's that lady with the pretty dog. Dalton once her account preserved under oath before trial.

It never happens. Vivian dies before the trial begins. Diana Kempos is a janitor at the county hospital.

On the morning of December 24, she is outside on a cigarette break at a spot above Moose Park. She sees a pregnant woman walking a golden retriever with two men following behind her. And the dog will not stop barking. Then one of the men in a beanie shouts shut the fucking dog up. Diana finishes her cigarette and goes back to work. Two days later, she sees a flyer of Lisi. Diana looks at it and thinks, hey, I know that girl. She reports it to security at the hospital

real good with faces. A few minutes later, she softens it. She's pretty sure.

“At about the same time, down at the parking lot at Moose Park, a driving instructor named”

Lyora Garcia is out with a student driver. She hasn't seen anyone walking a dog, but she tells police about a vehicle pulled to the side of the road with a long woman's coat hanging out caught in the door and then the vehicle speeds off. Lyora got part of the licensed plate number. Texas plates in a rainbow frame. She does not say it was a van or if she did, it does not make it into the report. Years later, when Dalton calls the Orah Garcia at home, she remembers it, well,

a white van. Now she says with a wooden rack on top. She tells Dalton that she had a terrible feeling watching it drive away. He writes, quote, something about the van frightened her. Russell Graybill

“has been a mailman for 10 years. For about the last year, his regular route has included Kavina Avenue.”

On December 24, he delivers the Peterson's mail between 1035 a.m. and 1050 a.m. and he can fix that time window because the post office requires him to scan his time as he goes. He tells the police two things that the side gate is wide open and that Mackenzie, the dog, does not bark at him. That dog he says barks at him every single day from wherever the dog is in the house. But this day, nothing. Graybill does not see Mackenzie anywhere. It strikes him as strange.

If Lacy is walking Mackenzie off property past 1035 a.m. then she is alive after Scott leaves the house for the Marina. But Karen's service says the mailman is wrong. She says she personally put the dog

“back in the Peterson's yard at 1018 closing the gate behind her. The jury never hears about”

the allegedly open gate or the dog that did not bark. What the mailman Graybill tells police is written down by hand and then it gets lost in the mass of paperwork. Thousands of pages are being scanned into the case file. The scanner skips about 10 of them and those 10 go to the defense

in a separate stack that never makes it onto the index of evidence. Peterson's appeal lawyers

find them years later going through boxes one page at a time. On the afternoon of December 26th, officers are outside of 523 Kavina setting up wooden barricades for crowd control. When a woman runs out of the house across the street at 516 screaming that she has been robbed. Susan Medina and her husband have just driven back from Los Angeles. They find their French doors have been kicked in. The safe from their master bedroom is gone and the dolly from their

tool shop out back is sitting on the front porch. The police officer assigned to the Medina burglary writes a supplemental report explaining why he did not go door to door investigating the burglary. Due to the priority given to 523 Kavina he writes, "I did not contact neighbors in regards to this incident." On January 2nd, police arrest Stephen Todd and Donald Pierce for the Medina burglary. The men live at the same address in Modesto's airport district,

the low income neighborhood that borders the Peterson's. An officer sits Stephen down to talk about the burglary before he can even start. Stephen says he had nothing to do with "the woman." The officer asks him what woman he's talking about. The missing woman with the baby says Stephen. The officer's report shows what happens next. He asks Stephen again to tell him about the burglary. There is no record of him asking about the missing woman again.

Strangely, exactly when the Medina burglary took place becomes a point of contention. Diane Jackson saw three men in a van outside of that house at 1140 AM on the morning of December 24th.

Here's what she told ABC back in 2021. I was coming down Kavina towards the park,

going past Lacey on one side, and Medina's on the other and I just looked over and there were three guys on Medina's property and a van out front and it. The only reason it caught my eye is that they turned around looked at me sort of made me think feel a little bit uncomfortable.

into, but the accounts do not line up neatly. The burglary Stephen tells police he went over the fence

“at 3 AM the morning of December 27th. That's clearly incorrect since the Medina's came home”

and found they'd been burglarized on December 26th. Co-burglary Donald's account put Steven there on December 26th saying Stephen came to him for help moving the safe. And when I interviewed Detective John Bueler in 2021, he gave me still another version of the department's timeline. So we broke into the house of the 25th and he took a bit of property on the 25th, but there was a save and some tools and other things that he couldn't take on his bike. So

he returns home and he's living in a shed behind his friend Don who's living with his mother

and he tells Don he there's a safe over there. We need to go back over and get that. So they return on the 26th and the reason we know that they were there on the 26th is they said they saw the

“media down the street when they were in the house and they could figure out what it was because”

they didn't know. The Modesto Police Department settles on December 26th as the date of the burglary and announces it has nothing to do with Lucy Peterson's disappearance. Ted Rollins covered the disappearance for KTVU in San Francisco reporting live from Kavina Avenue. Ted tells A&E the police timeline does not fit what he saw. The problem with that is I was standing outside that house at five in the morning on December 26th and I would have gone and interviewed

the burglars if they were out there because there was nobody outside the front of that house. My head was on a swivel that morning and there's absolutely no way a burglary to place on December 26th during those burglary morning hours. Stephen had three prior convictions for residential

“burglary. Dalton, Garagosa's investigator and a former prosecutor, argues this guy should have”

faced 25 years to life. He got eight years. Donald got 180 days. Both men pleaded guilty to breaking into the Medina House at night on December 27th. A day after the homeowners had discovered the crime. That is three days after Lacey Peterson disappeared and it is a version of events that puts them nowhere near Kavina Avenue on Christmas Eve. Two weeks or so after Lacey Peterson disappears, a lieutenant with the California Department of Corrections named Xavier Apante

hears about an inmate at his prison who has allegedly been talking about Lacey. The inmate is Sean Tenbrek. His brother Adam Tenbrek knows burglary Stephen Todd. Lieutenant Apante calls the Medesto police tip line twice. He says it takes at least a week before a detective calls him back. Apante tells a detective that he listened to a recorded call between the Tenbrek brothers on it. The lieutenant claims. Adam Tenbrek said he had heard that Lacey walked up while Stephen

Todd was burglarizing the house and that Stephen threatened Lacey. This is the only alleged account that places Lacey with the burglars across the street. A Medesto detective interviews Sean Tenbrek who denies everything. Lieutenant Apante says Sean Tenbrek then telephoned his mother asking her to tell Adam to keep his mouth shut because, quote, you don't know who you're dealing

with. Lieutenant Apante says he taped that call but he was never called as a witness and when

investigators went looking for that tape years later, it did not materialize. ABC reported this summer that Lieutenant Apante walked back his story entirely saying he doesn't really know what he heard. Medesto police and the prosecution dispute all of this account, they say there are no reports showing anyone from the department was ever in contact with Lieutenant Apante. In May of 2003, more than a year before the Scott Peterson trial, the videotaped police interviews with burglars

Stephen and Donald are marked for destruction. Prosecutors say the burglary was solved, both men had confessed and the evidence was destroyed as part of routine procedure. Scott Peterson's defense says that in a capital case evidence potentially connected to an alternate theory should have been preserved. Lacey Peterson was a member of the neighborhood watch group. People who knew her said that if there was somebody untaught in that neighborhood, she would have let them have it.

But for any of that to matter, she has to have walked up on the burglary while it was in progress

a van is found burning in an alleyway, a mile and a half from her front door.

“A Modesto fire investigator works the scene, rules it arson, and hands the case to the Modesto police”

department. In the back is a mattress. A Modesto police evidence technician tests material from that mattress and finds faint evidence of possible blood. His report carries a heading, missing person investigation. Under that, he writes Lacey Peterson's case file number. The potential blood sample goes to the State Department of Justice Lab, which finds no blood on the mattress. The fire investigation is closed as a separate case entirely. Scott Peterson's defense says it did not learn the van

existed until after the trial. No court has found that this van had anything to do with Lacey Peterson, and no one has established that it was the same van multiple witnesses reported seeing near the Peterson house. As for the Modena burglary, police reject the idea that it had anything to do with Lacey's disappearance warning. Don't put too much stock in vague witness accounts, like the one from the lady rushing home to make her husband a sandwich. Here's Detective John Bueler

to me in 2021. Well, it's pretty rare that a guy doing a property crime is going to turn into a doctor of a pregnant girl with it's walking a dog. If everybody, if Diane Jackson sees a van 1140 in the morning with three guys in it, but she can't even tell us if it's white, tan, or black, it kind of pulls into question her, you know, viability as a witness. Bueler says both burglars asked to take a polygraph examination because they knew they were going to

jail and didn't want other inmates thinking they had killed a pregnant woman and her baby. Bueler also points to other pregnant women in Lacey's neighborhood. Three of them, in fact, he interviewed two himself and one of them looked a lot like Lacey Peterson. She was due in January and she walked a mid-sized dog. She too was reportedly placed under hypnosis

“by the police department in an effort to help her remember her exact activities on the”

days in question. None of these people that came forward and claimed they saw Lacey there,

actually knew her. They didn't they never had a barbecue with her. They'd never been to her house.

So it's easy to misplace or misidentify somebody, especially with the coverage going on. Bueler doesn't believe Lacey Peterson was out walking that morning at all. On a trip to Disneyland in November, she had spent part of the day in a wheelchair. Her yoga instructor and her doctor had both told her not to walk at the end of the pregnancy. Her own mother did not believe she had gone walking.

And to think this girl that couldn't even move a mop bucket according to Scott would go down a uneven grade down to a park with a dog tugging at her when she saw the stable out of her feet and exhausted from everybody's account makes it sound to me like she didn't do that walk. As for that mailman, police interviewed Russell Graybill three days after Lacey disappeared.

“He cannot remember anything unusual about that morning when he sits with the police,”

even as he specifically remembers the Peterson's gate being open and McKenzie the dog not barking.

Diane Jackson gives her statement within days and then a second one on January 16th,

explaining exactly why she was so sure of the time she saw that van 1140 the morning of Christmas Eve. She can't remember the color the next day January 17th, they hypnotized her. Police hypnosis is meant to draw out details a witness cannot otherwise recall with Diane investigators want more detail about the men and the van. The defense will later want the same. Diane could make a great defense witness.

There's just one problem. In California hypnosis doesn't just probe a witness's memory, it can effectively end her usefulness as a witness. The rule goes back to a 1982 California Supreme Court ruling, people versus Shirley. Once a witness is hypnotized, it can become too difficult to assess the reliability of her memories. In addition, police here used an unqualified hypnotist. So Diane's statement about the men and the van and the time can be admitted,

but she will not be taking the stand as a witness. No other details. A reality Garagos later raises infiltration, accusing the prosecution of intentionally disqualifying her from telling

Jackson says the experience ruined her life. Her friends in Medesto treated her as though she had been trying to get Scott Peterson off. She says when she was only trying to tell the truth.

More than 20 years later, she still cannot say what was done to her. Here's what she tells legal

analyst Chris Pixley for Annie. I do member being hypnotized, but I don't remember, not big conscious of it. So I don't know, therefore was I really a conscious of it. Even if the Medinas were burglarized on the morning, Lacey Peterson went missing, there is not a single witness on the record, who contestified the burglars had any interaction with Lacey. By spring, the Scott Peterson case is everywhere in Medesto. Lacey Peterson's face

is on posters and shop windows and on the dashboards of cars. And then, Scott Peterson changes.

He grows a go-t and a mustache and lightens his hair. On April 12, he answers a classified

ad for a 1984 Mercedes Benz and pays $3,600 in cash. He has the DMV paper work with him. The seller looks at it and sees the name Jacqueline Peterson. That's Scott's mother. As the buyer, the seller asks about it. Scott insists the paperwork is right and that Jacqueline is his own name.

“It was kind of a boy named Sue, type name. He says, "That's what my parents stuck me with."”

He adds that he goes by Jack. On April 18, at 1135 in the morning, police arrest Scott Peterson near the Tori Pines golf course in La Jolla. Detective Albrokini arrives as Scott is being handcuffed.

He later describes the moment to Netflix. He had a orange hair, he had a orange go-t.

I walk up and he's out. Tell me it wasn't my wife and baby, you know, I'm like, that's ridiculous. I mean, you know, it's come on Scott, you know better than that. Police search his newly purchased Mercedes. They find just under $15,000 in cash. Mexican currency as well. His brother's driver's license, which the arresting detective notes now looks like Scott with his hair lightened. There's camping and survival gear. Weapons. Four cell phones. Tori Pines is close to the Peterson

family home in San Diego, where Scott said he was visiting. It's also about 30 miles from the Mexican border. Police interviewed the manager of the Tori Pines golf club where Scott says he was headed. The manager checks the book. Scott Peterson did not have a tea time. His father Lee did. Lee was down for 8 o'clock that morning for a force him. The state says Scott was running for the border. His family says he was going to play golf with his dad. But Scott Peterson's golf days

are now over. I'm Megan Kelly. Next time on MK confidential, the trial of Scott Peterson and my

“conversation with attorney Mark Garagos. Does he still think his client is stone-cold innocent?”

If you turn on CNN at 9 o'clock at night in the month of April 2003, you get one thing. Scott Peterson. Larry King is running a Peterson segment almost every night. One lawyer and seemingly only one lawyer at that table keeps taking a most unpopular position. And then it has a narcissist. And then his character flaws, but that does not make him a murderer. Mark, you can do it because he might be guilty of a danger.

That is Mark Garagos. Some nights he hits Scott Peterson, but most he defends him. He does not represent Scott Peterson, not yet. On April 18th, police arrest Scott Peterson. That evening, the state's attorney general announces that the bodies that watch to shore in San Francisco Bay are Lee C. Peterson and her son Connor. That night, Garagos tells Larry King that their bodies washing a shore within two miles of Scott's fishing trip alibi is, quote, "devestating."

Even still, Garagos criticizes how the case against Scott Peterson is being framed. And at no point does he say Peterson is guilty. 23 years after defending him in court, Mark Garagos spoke with us about his former client. Mark is now the co-host of the show in the well

“on our MK True Crime podcast channel. Does he think Scott Peterson is a killer?”

You know whether somebody is good for it. He's not good for it. I said it then. I've said it

the capability, the wear with all the ability to do it. When Garagos was making those rounds on

“cable news, he had not yet met Scott Peterson. He later says of those appearances, quote, "Maybe”

I was one of the media pundits who jumped on a bunch of misleading information and convicted the guy." That's not how Lee and Jackie Peterson saw it. In San Diego, Scott's parents are watching Garagos on TV almost every night. They had retained lawyer Kirk McCallister to represent their son after Leecy went missing. Once Scott is arrested, McCallister tells them that a case of this size is going to get expensive, very fast. They should just let the public defenders take it. In 2017,

Lee Peterson tells A&E why they did not take that advice. We contacted Mark Garagos because he was on Larry King's show just about every night and he was defending Scott. I finally said

all what's going to cost Mark. He said a million bucks and I said, "Wow." They cannot afford

him a higher him anyway. I'm Megan Kelly and this is MK Confidential. We began our conversation with Mark Garagos where his relationship with the Peterson family started on television talking about Scott. We before Mark had met the man he was arguing about.

“So before you actually got hired as counsel for Scott Peterson, what did you think of the case, Mark?”

You know, famously in fact, because of my smart act, Alec tendency, I had said on a show, I think it was Larry King who was back on CNN when CNN actually had more than four viewers. I said something to the effect of, "There are guys in state prison on a lot less evidence than where that then was facing Scott." And what I meant by that was the sheer coincidence, so speak of Blassey and Connor washing up that exactly the location. It wasn't really exactly,

but in the basically the bay for all intents and purposes was enough to get him convicted and sure enough at the end of the day fast forward. I don't want to step over everything else.

A couple of the jurors said they never would have convicted, but for that fact.

So you before the Peterson's called you, were you looking at this thing? He did it. I was commenting virtually, I mean people have to remember, we're almost in a return from 20 to 25 years ago. 20 to 25 years ago every summer there was always a trial of the century. There was always some what I used to call the axis of evil of true crime, which was cable shows at night. The morning shows and then back then it was people magazine. And if you

got into that kind of axis, you were done for. It was awful because before you even walked into a cart room, you were, you were done. That media machine would soon come for Garigos. By Friday, May 2, 2003, Garigos had now signed on as Scott Peterson's lawyer and walks out of the Stanislaus County courthouse to face the cameras. Reporters immediately asked about what

“looks like a change of heart. Garigos waves it off saying, "I think I succumbed to the media buzz."”

Mark's telling starts with Scott's mother. Jackie Peterson, Scott's mom, reached out to me and said she wanted to see me and I think came in initially at least just to try to correct the records on a speaking and make sure that I understood that she believed perfectly that he was innocent. I met with her and we had a long talk and I was so taken with her. She asked me to go meet with him. I met with him. I was convinced of his innocence after meeting him.

In Medesto, I went to the Medesto or Stanislaus County jail and that I took the case. I will tell you virtually everybody, virtually everybody including lawyers in my office, lawyers who ended up working on the case told me do not take this. I was coming off of basically a seven-year streak of not losing a case. I had one back-to-back Susan McDoodle on both coasts and

not guilty against kind of all odds. I had had a incredible streak and everybody said,

"Look, if you win the case, you're a pariah, all of Johnny Cochrane. Johnny, people forget. After O.J., Johnny didn't want to do another criminal case again. He was kind of remote.

pi lawyers because jurors would raise their hand and say, "I can't be fair because Johnny Cochrane

is the lawyer." He was that much hated. Here's what Pat Harris, a colleague of Mark's tells

him. Pat retold it to A&E in 2017. Mark, you are a very popular attorney. That's all going to end. Scott Peterson is the most hated man in America and if you take this case, you're going to be the second most hated man in America. One voice, however, calls Mark with a very different perspective. My father, who was my mentor, partner, and hero, he said to me, "Look, if you're not going to take this case because of the absolute blowback you're going to get." And he knew there would be blowback.

“Then you should be selling oranges on the side of the freeway. What are you doing? If you're more”

concerned about your reputation, then you shouldn't be doing this. And that scene outside of the

state of the Sloth County Sheriff station, when they had arrested Scott brought him in and people were surrounding the Sheriff station with placards asking that he'd be hung in man or monster and all that stuff. That kind of royal lead to the point where I said, "Okay, I'm going to jump in." Garagos takes the case with Scott's reputation already in Tatters. Scott is just wrapped and ill-advised interview spree, which includes a train wreck sit down with Diane Sawyer.

Do you really expect people to believe that an eight and a half month pregnant woman learns her husband has had an affair and is saintly and casual about it? Accommodating makes a peace with it? Well, yeah, you don't know. No one knows our relationship but us. And that's a peace with it. Not happy about it. In the wake of exchanges like that, what convinced Garagos that Scott was actually innocent?

It's kind of a Malcolm Gladwell 10,000 reps, 10,000 hours. I talk about this with Corolla all the time to you get a sense. You know, you have, I mean, you're not infallible when it comes to that.

“But you know, nothing in his background shows that he could have done it. You have to understand”

it's the only time that I can think of in any case and I've tried hundreds of cases. I stopped coming to 300 that I've ever called a nun under the stand as a character witness. And even she talked about she had grown up or watched him grow up and said he had no violence in his background. He had no indication whatsoever that he could ever hurt anybody. In fact, it was quite the contrary. He was the most docial kind of laid back kid. Garagos maintains

it's not the evidence against Scott that has convinced most people he's guilty but something else. I do know why this thing has fascination in my humble opinion. I, and I talked to him about this before and don't take this don't be insulted because you fall into the category and I love

“you dearly. But I would be sitting at the gym before court each morning and inevitably I would”

get approached by and it was almost always a white professional woman and they would ask me questions

and I would say no if you would why if there was TV in the court you would understand that didn't happen and then I would explain it and then the same question and it would happen over and over and over again and inevitably across the board every single one of them said to me I don't care what the evidence was. I had an ex-boyfriend and if he was cheating on me with that that husky or whatever name they would call me and berfry he would have done the same thing and I can see it. And so there is this kind of

just the federal reaction where you can't get past that it is just the picture of Lacy sitting in the chair at the Christmas party, pregnant, beautiful, resplendent and then place side by side with the picture of him with his arm around the masseuse therapist from Fresno, California who fits the archetype of many a wife and you can't get past that for a certain demographic or a certain constituency. There is also the matter of Scott Peterson standing in a Modesto park

on New Year's Eve at a vigil for his missing wife three blocks from his own home telling his lover Amber Fry that he is in Paris celebrating New Year's with a huge French crowd. I'm going to take a while guess that Megan Kelly has a real problem with that.

from somebody. Do you think you'd know if you were across from a sociopath?

“I think I don't know that this is something I want on my tombstone. I don't think anybody”

his handle is many murder cases as I have and if I were to tack on I mean you know my first

13 years of my life my father was a homicide prosecutor in the LADA's office that's all I watched. I used to follow him around the court and watch him do murder cases. I watched him while waiting for bar results he had three murder cases pending and I watched all three trials while waiting for them back to back to back. I can't tell you how many murder cases. I don't know that it's a skill set that anybody wants to brag about but I will tell you I know who is capable of this.

I know who's got it in them and I can also tell you just from working with somebody what

“triggered it. I had one point in fact it's how I got Susan McDougall's case. I had one point four”

women on what we called murderers row in the old civil brand jail. Civil brand jail was this

notorious women's prison jail that a prison in LA and those I've never had before since four

women charged with murder but I will tell you all four of them I knew had committed the act. All four had killed another human being in various ways but all four were ultimately not convicted of murder because there was a backstory to it and I knew that and I did not have to reinvent the facts so to speak. Scott I never had that. Despite Mark's gut feelings on Peterson the jury that decided the case did look at the evidence. Well the jurors two of the jurors who sat on the case

gave an interview to Netflix for their most recent special and they were pointing to not the affair. Both of those guys said the affair did not move us. We understood that men cheek. It was they said the tapes, ambers, tapes of Scott and what he was saying to her while people were

“searching for Lacy. Obviously he was trying to keep this woman on the line and they I think couldn't”

get past how cold he was about the fact that his wife was quote missing during those tapes. jurors Mike Bell Messieri and Mark Baratlus described the impact of those recorded phone calls to Netflix in 2024. A lot of people believe that the affair was a big deal. I didn't see this a big deal and I don't think anybody on a jury did either. What we did see as a big deal is what he said and what he did. It was damning. It was absolutely damning and not only the phone calls,

but the lies. Yes, the bit the charade. Garagos says his co-castle, Pat Harris, understood the danger of those tapes immediately and in trying to explain Scott's behavior, they kept coming back to another disappearance that had consumed Modesto, California only a few years earlier and one familiar to MK confidential fans. Pat Harris who I tried that case when it would have been my partner for many years. In fact, I met Pat. Fun story. Pat was Susan McDougle's

fiancé when I first met Susan McDougle during white water and Pat came in to try to fire me because Susan had hired me and he ended up becoming my partner and law firm partner for 15 years and he ended up dumping Susan. When Pat first heard those tapes because he was deep into the case

in the prep of it and he called me up and he said I were never getting past these tapes and I

said why and he says even though I know why he did it, there's no way we can capture that or present that to the jury and I explained to him what I was going to try to do and we were not, I didn't think entirely successful. Who were three years before Lacey went missing? In Modesto, there was a congressman. His name was Gary Condon. Gary Condon was a client of mine and so I was very familiar with that case. Gary was admitted to having an affair with Sandra Levy.

Sandra Levy was from the Modesto area. Sandra Levy went missing and Gary Condon as soon as they discovered the affair and Gary had disclosed it to the investigators that was it. They were

on Gary and because the prosecutors were so fixated on Gary, they lost all kinds of opportunity. I tell you that story because Scott was well aware of that. He understood completely living in Modesto. Gary Condon was a beloved congressman. Everybody there understood that Gary's career was torched because of admitting the fair with Sandra. Scott knew the minute that Amber's surface, Modesto,

“who had already, all you have to do is take a look at that first or second interview in the Modesto”

Police Department of Stairsoft County where they're already suspicious of him. They're already in his face. He knew that if Amber's surface he was done, they'd stopped looking for Lacey and it was over with unfortunately the jurors I'm sure had an enormous amount of problems with when the vigil he's sitting at the vigil that he's talking about the rooftops of Paris.

But the jury never heard that explanation. Scott Peterson would never take the stand.

In San Mateo County, the bias against Scott Peterson shows up before the trial even begins. Nearly every perspective juror has already heard about the case. And almost 45% say, they believe Scott Peterson is guilty. We went through 16 other jury questionnaires.

“And people, I used to say people who were illiterate were writing, "Get the GIPY."”

The Buddhist stop there because we were in San Mateo as a large community there would say, "I'm against the death penalty conceptually, but for Scott Peterson I'll make an exception." I mean it was the wildest thing I've ever seen. There was a billboard truck circling the courthouse during the jury selection. As jurors are coming into the courthouse and it's got a giant poster of Scott. It is orange jumpsuit and it's you had people vote man or monster.

And it was a, like I said, it reminded me in some ways of the Jim Crow South or at least of what

I always used to imagine, you know, I grew up reading to kill a mockingbird and it had that

kind of a feel to at least for my standpoint. During death penalty questioning, perspective jurors are brought in one at a time so that one person's answers do not influence the rest of the pool. Garagos is looking for what lawyers sometimes call a stealth juror, someone trying to get onto the jury with a verdict already in mind. He gets at least two prospective jurors excused. One had reportedly bragged during a bus trip to Reno that the fertilizer salesman was going to

get what was coming to him. The second is more striking. She tells Garagos and prosecutor Rick Dostaso that she can put aside her feelings about Scott and be fair. Garagos believes her so does Dostaso. There was one woman who came in and I remember talking to Dostaso. She said something did the effect. You know, Mr. Garagos, yeah, I didn't think I could be fair, but then I talked to my dad and my dad said, what if it was your brother? And I thought, you know what intellectually

“I'm going to put aside the animus I have for Scott and your client and I think I could be fair.”

And I remember she left and I turned into Dostaso and I said, we should order her back. She's good. And Dostaso said, I thought the same thing. And I went back to the hotel afterwards and back then there were things called fax machines and somebody had faxed me a chat that she was in or some kind of a conversation. And it basically said, I really pulled what over on that I'm shit the fence wire. I'm going to get on this. I'm going to get on to this jury and I'm going

to fry his client and we brought him by and I confronted her. She had also had a restraining order

in the same courthouse and he had never found it. So she was excuse. After that, once the jury is chosen,

Garagos asks the judge to sequester them to keep the jurors and alternates together and away from the coverage for the duration of the trial. Whole judge Deloque again when I would complain bitterly about the atmosphere around it. He would say, what do you want me to do? Put the jurors in a time capsule or put them in a spaceship and have them circle the earth and I said, no, what I want you to do is sequester this jury because the community is in an outrage over this case.

The judge says no. For the next five months, the jurors go home each and every night into the same media environment Garagos has been warning about since jury selection. The trial begins

set on opposite sides of the room. Reporters fill the seats between them. Outside members of the

“public begin lining up before dawn for a lottery system that will decide who gets inside the courtroom”

that day. Prosecutor Rick Distaso goes first. His opening takes the full day. Among the things he tells the jury is that Scott lied about watching Martha Stewart on TV with Lacey on Christmas Eve morning. Scott had told police they were watching a segment about Marine. Distaso says the

episode airing December 24th never mentioned Marine. The next morning belongs to Margaragos.

He does not try to make Scott Peterson likeable. He calls his client a cad and describes some of his behavior as "Bourish." Then he turns to the physical evidence. Investigators have taken more than a hundred bags of evidence from the Peterson home and Scott's warehouse and sent it for testing. Garagos picks up the Department of Justice Lab reports and gives the jury his summary of

“it. Zip, Nada, not a thing. No physical evidence he argues connects Scott Peterson to Lacey's murder.”

Garagos then goes further. He makes promises about what the defense will prove. He will call witnesses he says who saw Lacey Peterson alive and walking her dog after Scott had already left the house. He says an expert will show that Baby Connor lived beyond Christmas Eve. And he tells the jury that Scott Peterson is not just not guilty that he is quote stone-cold innocent. Then Garagos goes after one of the prosecutions opening day claims.

He plays the Martha Stewart tape from Christmas Eve. What are we going to do with all the egg white

jury? Ooh, one of the little morangs. Oh, no, you nice. Huh? Garagos plays the tape a second time,

saying quote, "Just in case the Modesto PD couldn't hear it." People laugh. On the second day of the trial, one of the prosecutions opening claims that Scott killed Lacey on the evening of December 23rd and spent the next morning moving her body takes a massive hit. Garagos gets the state's computer expert to confirm that at 8.40 a.m. on Christmas Eve, someone logged on to the Peterson's home computer using Lacey's password, Sunflower, and searched for a sunflower on Brella stand and women's

clothing. If that was Lacey, then she was alive the morning of the 24th and the timeline to Stasso

had given the jury in his opening could not be right. The prosecution adjusts its timeline.

Garagos remembers the moment this way. Rick Stasso started this trial with the theory that the killing had taken place on the 23rd, not on the day before. I mean, on the day before, not on the day she went missing. By the time we got too closing, they abandoned that. They agreed

“and he argued him closing. It doesn't matter because I think we had definitively proved that”

the cross-examination of the forensic expert showed that she had logged in to her computer on the morning of the 24th. Their whole search warrant at the David that said Martha Stewart had not been on the 24th but on the 23rd when Scott told her that was debunked. We showed that Martha Stewart was on the 24th. We showed that she had that Lacey, that somebody had used Lacey's password, somebody had access some sunflower related, which she had a tattoo of on the morning of the 24th.

The dog was out with the muddy leash. Garagos says it was Lacey who logged in. The evidence establishes only that someone using her password did. By closing, however, the prosecution is no longer committed to December 23rd as the night Lacey was killed. Telling the jury, quote, "It's very simple. The defendant strangled or smothered Lacey Peterson. The night of December 23rd or in the morning while she was getting dressed on the 24th. I can't tell you when he did it.

I can't tell you if he did it at night. I can't tell you if he did it in the morning. I'm not going to try to convince you of something that I cannot prove. I don't have to prove that to you. I only have to prove that he did it." On the 13th day of testimony, the state calls Detective Albroquini. He will spend much of the next week on the stand. While he is testifying the jury loses one of its members. A courthouse camera

catches juror number five, Justin Falconer, speaking with Lacey's brother, near the security checkpoint. Judge Deluki looks into it and decides the conversation was harmless. But after the incident draws

despite the judge's orders to stay away from the news and not discuss the case. Two days later,

Deluki removes him from the jury. Falconer walks out of the courthouse and directly into the arms of reporters. They ask him the question everyone once answered. After what he has heard so far, does he think Scott Peterson is guilty? "Well, the prosecution hasn't given me any reason to believe it. All the prosecution witnesses have pretty much been just as good a witness for the defense as they were for the prosecution, if not in some cases better for the defense.

And I haven't heard any testimony whatsoever that would leave me to believe that he was guilty." Asked how he would vote if he had to decide the case that day, Falconer says,

"Not guilty. So far, Gary goes isn't doing too badly. Gary goes meanwhile has been fighting

over discovery almost from the day he took over the Peterson case. Arguing that prosecutors are consistently turning over evidence late or only after repeated requests. And he is convincing

“the judge." "I will tell you that I think in real time, not now. But in real time,”

I knew the facts better than anybody. I knew the discovery better than anybody. It's one of the reasons during that trial. We had not one not two three separate recesses in the late great, out of the lukki who was the judge, had excoriated the prosecution for the for their discovery compliance, for not turning over discovery, or not following up on expoatory leads. And I was valuating about that every single day, making motions for

this trials the whole bit." Journalist Catherine Crier covered the trial from inside the courtroom and writes that Judge Delukki took to chest-izing prosecutors in open court about discovery issues. But while Gary goes may be scoring points, there are facts that will prove insurmountable for him. "Let me ask you the things that convinced me, he did it. The tapes with Amber are bad for sure. I accept that there is an explanation for them. There is a version of him doing

that stuff with Amber that doesn't have Scott as a murderer. However, the fact that he bought that boat after they affair began, he did not tell anybody that he bought that boat. He went out fishing on Christmas Eve. He placed himself at the scene. I didn't interrupt you. He places himself at the scene where the bodies wash up. And on top of that, Lacy's body washes up without her head, her arms, or the lower legs. And he clearly, the killer, clearly waited the body down

in an effort to keep it at the bottom of the sea. And sure enough, they found what looked like the molds for four concrete anchors. His boat had some concrete remnants on the inside of it. And it matched the little picture that the detectives found on that boat perfectly. And yet,

those anchors were never found. And to me, that is absolutely devastating for Scott Peterson.

“Okay. So, like I said, I feel like I'm in the gym. Number one, what was your first point?”

That was the one where you... He bought this boat after the affair began and didn't tell anybody. He didn't know about, right. During the trial, they put on the lead detective, Al Broquini. Guess what? And mind you, I had spent one week doing mitochondrial in California at the time. It shows you how long ago this was. mitochondrial DNA was not admissible in California. In order to have the prosecution be able to introduce mitochondrial DNA, which is DNA that is linked to the

maternal lineage. And they had a hair. And they wanted to show that the hair was in the boat. So, aha. Lacy was in the boat. Lacy didn't know about the boat. You're kind of aha moment. Well, guess what happened during the cross examination in Balbroquini? I had, they didn't realize Al Broquini had whiteed out a paragraph in his report. I had him produce the original report. What he had whiteed out was Al Broquini himself had interviewed a witness at the warehouse who saw

Lacy in the boat. Actually, saw in the boat, he had whiteed it out. So, I spent a week contesting mitochondrial DNA so that we could get admitted when all along, Modesto PD knew that she was in the boat. They had a witness who was at the warehouse. Stop there because what

“Mark just said leaves out an important part of what happened. The witness is a woman named Peggy O'Donnell,”

who runs a business a few doors down from Scott in the same warehouse complex. Peggy tells police

disappeared. This happens on either December 20th or December 23rd, Peggy isn't sure which date.

If true that places Lacy at the warehouse complex, not in Scott's boat. But Garagos is right about

“one important part of this. Broquini had removed witness information about Peggy O'Donnell from his”

report. One sentence has been removed. It is about O'Donnell's claim that Lacy visited the warehouse complex on either December 20th or December 23rd and asked to use O'Donnell's bathroom. On cross-examination Garagos produces a page of Broquini's notes, which include a line that reads quote Lacy used restroom on 1223 Peggy and quote Garagos then asks the detective. Can you tell me how that particular piece of information got excised out of your police report? I excised it, Broquini answers.

You did it? Yes, I did. The reaction in the courtroom is immediate. Garagos asks the judge

whether they might stop for the weekend and let that exchange sit with the jury for three days. But Broquini has an explanation and after the weekend the jury hears it. Prosecutors asked him about the missing sentence and Broquini says the information had not disappeared from the case that another detective named Dennis Holmes included Peggy's account in his report from that day and that unlike Broquini Holmes had interviewed Peggy O'Donnell directly.

In 2024 Broquini explained his reasoning to Netflix and conceded the optics in court. What happened was on this one day after I dictated, turn it in, now we all sit down together and I tell all the detectives. What I heard and detective Dennis Holmes he says, whoa, I interviewed Peggy. So he could testify to what Peggy said. Mine was through the grapevine and so I deleted that sense because it was in his report. Could look wrong to the jury. It could look wrong to the

penal roaches. Broquini's explanation does not end the argument. Garagos still sees the missing sentence as part of a larger pattern. Evidence he says was mishandled, minimized, or disclosed, too late. But when I pressed him on what that evidence actually proved, the argument quickly moved back to the boat. He waited it out because another detective put it in his report and had interviewed this person. How we found it and he waited it out. So it wouldn't be, wouldn't get to the

“defense. But it was in the public record because another cop put it in his report. That's how we found it.”

He had holes. Yes. So how is it nefarious for Broquini to have taken it out and he understood. His report was hearsay, but he had the actual cop who had interviewed the woman before us. He was doing it in an affidavit. He was doing it in the affidavit to be presented to the judge and he had widened it out. Okay. Yeah. The thing is, there's no proof that Lacy was ever in that boat. And Scott also said he was taking, he told investigators, he was taking that boat out.

Allegedly half the reason was so he could just see how it, how it went. So we're to believe that Lacy went to the warehouse. She just sat in the boat just sat there. They didn't go out and hit. He just said it's just run by the way. She, it's funny you say that and I'm glad you do. She got in the boat. She did exactly what the jurors did. Do you know what the jurors did during deliberation? They had, we had the boat. It was in the courthouse. The jurors went down. They wanted to

see the boat day three or day four of deliberation. They actually got in the boat and started doing Lacy did to see about his buoyancy. I turned to Deluke and I said, okay, do you remember when I did a demonstration? I actually, and it's somewhere as somebody put it in the internet because it was an exhibit. I quit this poor kid who worked for me in the boat. I gave him a dummy that weighed approximately what Lacy did and I tried to have him re-enact what actually happened. He sunk every

time. Unfortunately for Rafi, who was the guy in the boat, he didn't swim and I had to save in each time.

But that judge would not allow that indefinence. That was one of the first things the jurors wanted

to do was get in and test the buoyancy of the boat. Number two, before you go off on the boat. How, where's your witness who said she saw Lacy get in the boat? Is she testifying? No, she did not testify. They admitted that they were wrong during the trial. The witness,

“that came into evidence. That's what I'm saying. If this was--”

Did you call the witness? No, why don't you call the witness to testify to that? He admitted that, yes, she had been in the boat and he had widened it out. I didn't need it at that point. No, no, no, no. If you had a witness to saw Lacy, Peter's in getting into that boat and you felt good about that witness, you Mark Eregus would have called her to get to testify to trial. You know, and I know it,

This case started in opening statements with them saying Scott had killed Lacy on the 23rd that we're dodging. Where was your witness? Why didn't you call the magical witness who could place Lacy in the boat? Because they admitted she afterwards, they abandoned that. The same way they abandoned that she was killed on the 23rd. We would not down every single theory and it came down. Really? Where? Why didn't you call all the witnesses who saw Lacy

walking her dog after 10/30? For the exact same reason. The case started that she-- So much magical evidence that would have gotten your client off that just you decided not to call in front of the jury because somehow it had been admitted. It had all been admitted and the jury which is dumb to understand it. No. The jury was dumb. I really don't. I don't think it was a

“done jury. I think that the jurors did what the community wanted, which was to convict.”

Because at the end of the day, there wasn't a coherent theory. I'll give you another example.

How about Scott's for a little anchors? Okay, they never found the anchors. The most--

I know. They're at the bottom of the sea holding down Lacy's arms and her head. Okay. Now, when you say bottom of the sea, you're conveying to people that somehow this is a very deep area. You realize that the day that was searched, that on low tide, they found that they not only had so-and-our subs. They not only had all kinds of searches out there. They found snapple bottles. They found boots. They found tires. They found everything in the world.

They did not find anchors. They did not find Lacy. They did not find Connor. The reason for that is because they weren't there. And yet, we know they were in there. No. It was after all because--

“Because the real killer dumped the bodies. That's it. That's your-- Is that your theory?”

No. My theory is that wherever they were, they were washed up into that area by the storm.

The jury never sees Garagos' boat demonstration. Instead, prosecutors call a commercial fisherman

and ask whether a 153-pound fish waited with four 10-pound weights could be pushed over the side of a 14-foot aluminum boat without capsizing it. Without hesitation, his answer is yes. Jure John Gwynoso, leader called the fisherman, the star witness of the trial. Then Garagos catches Burkini in another error. Burkini tells the jury about a tip from Miguel Espedia, one of Scott's former college classmates. Miguel had said that years earlier,

in 1995, Scott had talked hypothetically about how someone might dispose of a body. Cover the head, wait the body down, and put it in salt water where the water and marine life would eventually destroy the evidence. From the witness stand, Burkini adds another detail. He says Scott had talked about wrapping the head in duct tape. That matters because there was duct tape on Lacey Peterson's remains when she came ashore. Garagos goes back to the original

tip report. Espedia never mentions duct tape. Burkini acknowledges that he supplied that detail,

the duct tape from memory, and that he got it wrong. He has not reviewed the original police report on the tip in months. So the alleged conversation about the duct tape did not happen, but Scott fantasizing about disposing of a body at sea did, or so the jury hears. Garagos moves to have the case dismissed, and judge Deluki denies the motion. But what about the hair? Police reports log a single hair collected as evidence from the nose

of those pliers in the boat. But by the time the envelope was examined, two hairs turned up inside. Garagos grills the detective over the exact number of hairs found at Scott's warehouse in the boat. Prosecutors claim the single hair broken half in the envelope. But Garagos says that theory is made up, and that it was made up after the defense began asking

“tough questions. One hair went in, Burkini says, and two hairs came out. Is this a magic envelope?”

asks Garagos. FBI analyst Constance Fisher testifies about the hair during the trial. Fisher estimates that one in 112 people in Medesto share the same profile as the hair found in Scott Peterson's boat, less than 1%. The defense calls Dr. William Shields, who challenges that figure. Shields says the DNA could be as common as one in nine people in Medesto, and points out the size of the FBI database and the error rate for mitochondrial DNA testing. Both experts agree that the DNA

The trial moves on into August. On August 10, 2004, Amber Fry walks into courtroom to M.

“Years later, she described that moment to ANE. Remember the door's open?”

You can hear a pin drop, it was so quiet. You can hear everybody's body shifting,

as I'm walking in. But the most important evidence Amber brings into the courtroom is not what

she says from the witness stand. It is what Scott said to her on those secret tapes. Scott Peterson never testifies, but for days, the jury hears his voice through Amber's undercover recordings, following along on printed transcripts as the calls are played in court. Defense co-council Pat Harris had seen this problem coming while reviewing discovery. He later tells ANE that he believed those tapes alone could sink the entire defense. Then we got the actual tapes.

I started listening the tapes, and after I'd finished, I went into Mark's office and I said,

“"Wish great." Because when you hear them, it's a whole different thing. Because Scott is on the”

phone with Amber, and you hear giggling, and you hear sort of the tone's voice, and it changes

the whole dynamic. Take New Year's Eve, for example. Three blocks from Scott and Lacy's home roughly 1,000 people gather for a candlelight vigil for Lacy. Tears are shed for the missing mother and child, and Scott is on the phone with Amber. For juror number one, Greg Beratlis, those calls would be a turning point. Years later, he explained why to ANE. When I started to think that Scott was guilty, it was when Amber fried King.

To hear the tapes, he saw that it wasn't hard for him to lie. He was trying to have both a wife disappeared, and he's trying to find her supposedly, and at the same time he's still trying to lead Amber Fry on. Seven court days later, on August 23rd, Garagos begins his cross-examination of Amber Fry. Go ahead, Mr. Garagos. Judge Deluki tells him, "No questions, Your Honor." The courtroom gasps. What? Deluki says. Just kidding Garagos says,

trying to lighten it up a little. There is laughter in the courtroom. Outside, afterward, Sharon Rocha tells reporters she sees nothing funny about the murder of her daughter, Lacy. The defense begins its case on October 18th, 20 weeks into the trial. Garagos builds his argument and on the 21st, he produces one of the witnesses he promised the jury, an expert who he says will prove that baby Connor was alive on Christmas Eve and beyond. Dr. Charles March,

a fertility specialist, dates Connor's death to December 29th. That would mean Connor and Lacy were alive five days after Christmas Eve, which would blow apart the prosecution's timeline. Then prosecutor Dave Harris gets up. Dr. March's date depended on an assumption. He had assumed Lacy took a pregnancy test on June 9th, 2002, because she had not announced her pregnancy at a friend's baby shower the day before that. His reasoning out loud on the stand is that

women talk. Of course, sometimes they don't talk about things like their own pregnancy at another woman's baby shower where one's friend is supposed to be the center of attention. He conceans he has done no testing himself and that the state's expert, Dr. Gregory Devor, is better qualified to read the ultrasound. Dr. Devor estimated that Connor died on either December 23rd or 24th with a few days margin of error on either side. He mapped the measurements from Lacy's

first and second trimester ultrasound forward and then compared them to Connor's size when he was found.

Garagos attacked his methodology on cross, but for prosecutors Devor's testimony is enormously

“important. The state had already called forensic anthropologist Dr. Allison Galloway,”

based on measurements of Connor's remains, she could only put his age at somewhere between 33 and 38 weeks in the womb to broaden to pinpoint a particular date of death. Devor gives them a calculation that points directly at the day Lacy disappeared. And the jury listens. Devor's testimony would later be described as one of the most persuasive pieces of scientific evidence in the state's case. That leaves Garagos's promise about the eyewitnesses.

morning and later than the time Scott allegedly left with her body in his truck.

“Garagos promised them to the jury in his opening statement. He calls none of them.”

Matt Dalton, the investigator who found those witnesses and interviewed every one of them,

still says he does not know why Garagos never called them. The defense calls the total of

14 witnesses. Five of them are police officers and through them Garagos does elicit testimony repeating what the uncalled eyewitnesses claimed they had seen. The judge tells the jury to only consider the officer's actions in response to those reports, however, not the actual sightings themselves. In other words, these testimonials were hearsay, as told by the officers, and could not be considered for the truth of what the eyewitnesses actually said.

For that, you would need to call the witnesses. But Garagos did not. Three of the defense witnesses are subject matter experts, one in cement, one in finance,

“and one in dog tracking. Garagos also calls Scott Peterson's parents to the stand.”

When police arrested Scott 30 miles north of the border, they found nearly $15,000 in cash in his car.

His mother Jackie Peterson tells the jury the money came from her. Ten days before the arrest, she had been arranging to buy Scott's truck to give to his brother, she says, and in the process she accidentally withdrew $10,000 from an account belonging to Scott. She gave him extra cash to make up for the mistake. Journalist Catherine Krier watching from the courtroom wrote that the explanation sounded illogical, bordering on the absurd.

Lee Peterson had been called by the prosecution earlier in the trial. Told the jury, "Scott's the fisherman," he says, "I'm more the golfer." Under Garagos's questioning, Lee Peterson confirmed Scott was staying in San Diego the week he

“was arrested, not far from a golf course where his father had an 8 AMT time.”

Eight days into its case, on October 26, 2004, the defense rests. I asked Mark for his best proof that Scott Peterson is innocent, not reasonable doubt, but stone cold innocent, like he told the jury. The body was held under, and it said, "You gave a synopsis of what the prosecution was." Take any single one of those. The body was held under water. That's not what the pathologist

testified. The prosecution witness was that the body was not under water. That the condition of the body and I was at the autopsy, and without getting grotesque, I will tell you that there is no way that body was under water and no scientist, nor no prosecution witness ever said that that body was held under water. He could not have been held under water because of the condition that the body was in. So that debunks that in terms of going fishing on that day,

up until the cross examination of Ron Gransky, who was married to Sharon, up until trial itself.

It was never disclosed that, guess where Ron Gransky was on the day before Christmas at the exact

same time Scott was fishing. He too was fishing. So us, by coastal elites, may not go fishing on Christmas Eve, but if you are in this country. And so with Scott, Scott wanted to be. Scott was there. He said he wanted to be. He wanted to be. Started that desire on the day he murdered his wife. Really wanted to get out there. We'll get to whether the body was under water in one minute. But first, a response to Garagos' theory of the case.

You and I both know that burglars who get spotted by an neighborhood pregnant lady are not known for, let's abduct the pregnant lady. Let's kill the pregnant lady. Let's hold the body and wait and then we'll jump it in the bay when we find out that the husband took the boda. They leave. If they're going to do anything to the eyewitness, they're going to hurt her and move on. Like the notion that these guys came to rob, got spotted by the pregnant lady, captured the

pregnant lady, held the pregnant lady, did something with the pregnant lady, then killed the pregnant lady, then held the bodies, then made sure the bodies would wash up as opposed to the guy who was married to the pregnant lady who was the most likely to kill her on the face of the earth. That is when a woman is most vulnerable to domestic violence when she's pregnant with a baby. Who's having an affair, who's already told the affair partner that his wife has been lost,

that he's lost his wife, who's bought a boat without telegrafting it to the family,

produces the receipt that he actually was at the bay where the bodies would ultimately wind up,

“and magically has four anchors that he produced that we can't find and this body has been held”

down underwater by something heavy. The two scenarios, it's so clear if you're not representing Scott Peterson, the forensic pathologist who examined Lacy's body did testify that it had been in the water for, quote, months. His name is Dr. Brian Peterson, no relation to the defendant. Dr. Peterson also testifies that there were no tool marks on Lacy's joints. Dr. Galaway, the forensic anthropologist, examined Lacy's body as well. She offers a more specific

timeline in court three to six months in the water. Galaway found barnacles on one of Lacy's exposed bones. Galaway testifies that decomposition alone could explain how Lacy's limbs separated

“from her body, she found no evidence to the contrary. According to Katherine Crier, the medical”

examiner, who performed Lacy's sealed autopsy suggests the limbs were either cut with surgical precision or they were weighted down and pulled apart by the currents of the bay. Prosecutor Dave Harris asks pathologist Dr. Peterson about the weights directly on the stand. Dr. Peterson says either natural decomposition or weights on the limbs could explain how Lacy's body

came apart. Her remains were consistent with both explanations. Finally, Dr. Peterson confirms

that Lacy's body showed no evidence of a vaginal birth. There was a rip in her abdominal wall big enough that Connor's body could have passed through. This can happen when a mother dies, as gas is build up and eventually burst through her body in what is known as a coffin birth. No cause of death for Lacy Peterson is ever firmly established. Despite the Garagos charm and lovable swagger about this case, he does have one big regret and I asked him about it.

Okay, let me ask you this. At this point in time because there is still a contingent trying to find a way to get Scott Peterson a new trial. If he got one and you were to handle it, what would you do differently? Well, number one, the biggest mistake I made is it wasn't televised. If it had been televised, then we wouldn't have the urban legends of what the case involved. The people who weren't in the courtroom would tell you that this case fell apart during

the entire time. What didn't fall apart was the hatred, the animus and this idea that he was a bad bad man that needed to be punished. That did not fade away. But if you had seen the evidence in real time and there was over a hundred witnesses and when the kind of cherry picking of what the urban legends are were debunked in real time by what actually happened in the courtroom. So

“the first thing I would suggest to whoever retry this case is you have to have a camera in the courtroom.”

Judge Deluki had barred cameras from the courtroom. So for five months, anyone who wanted to see the trial Garagos believed he was winning had to be in the room. The only way in was as a juror an alternate reporter or one of the lucky few who want a public seat in the morning lottery.

On November 1st and 2nd 2004, both sides give their closing arguments. On the third a jury of 12

people goes behind a closed door to decide Scott Peterson's fate and the drama in that jury room will become yet another twist in this case. I'm Megan Kelly and this is MK Confidential. The jury in the Scott Peterson case has been deliberating for four days and they want to see the boat. On Monday, November 8th, 2004, a bailiff knocks on the deliberation room door and leads 12 jurors down a passageway into an underground garage beneath the Redwood City Courthouse. Scott's 14

foot aluminum fishing boat, which was introduced as evidence, has been stored down there for the length of the trial. Judge Alfred Deluki comes to, in a suit instead of his robes, Scott Peterson walks down in his suit, unshackled. Juror #1 asks the judge for permission to come aboard the boat. Deluki says yes, but reminds the juror, the boat is on a trailer and not on a cruise in San Francisco Bay.

side, seeing how much it would take to tip it. Scott's attorney Mark Garagos objects that they're

“running and out of court experiment and Judge Deluki puts a stop to it. Garagos moves for a mistrial”

which the judge denies. Juror #1 is Greg Beratless, an engineer for the power company, who coaches youth football on weekends. Five months of testimony have told him Scott Peterson is a man who puts coasters under everything. He is meticulous with his equipment. What Greg notices, sitting in the boat, is a pair of pliers going rusty and standing water in the boat. Greg thinks

this does not fit. It's as if the boat was never going to be a long-term hobby, but only purchased

for one purpose. Four days later, 12 jurors convict Scott Peterson of two murders. But they are not the same 12 people who went down to that underground garage. Two of the jurors standing around

“that boat leave the case, including the foreman who climbed in behind Beratless. The two alternate”

jurors who replaced them never see the boat. Their arrival forces the jury to wipe away its work and start deliberations over twice in two days. Within hours of the second restart, they take their first boat and it is unanimous guilty. I'm Megan Kelly, and this is MK confidential.

A November 1st, 2004, prosecutor Rick Distasto stands up to deliver to the jury his closing argument.

He starts with the part of the case the prosecution cannot answer. He cannot tell the jury exactly how Lacey Peterson died. He cannot tell them exactly when. But he says they do know where Scott Peterson was on Christmas Eve, and where Lacey and Connor were found four months later. Distasto puts an aerial photograph of San Francisco Bay in front of the jury and starts pointing. "The defendant went fishing right here off of Brook's Island," or he said he went fishing.

That's where he took his boat that day. Four months later, Lacey Peterson washed a sure right here at Point Isabel near Brook's Island. Connor Peterson washed a sure right here at the Richmond shoreline in that marshy area. The only man he continued or only person that we know without any doubt that was in the exact location, or Lacey and Connor's bodies washed a sure at the exact time that they went missing is sitting right there. The connection was devastating.

Garagos predicted it would be early on before he was even hired.

Jurors writing about the verdict later cited it as absolutely critical to their decision. Scott was

there and so were the bodies. Distasto tells the jury that strangling or smothering can leave very little physical evidence behind. But the state does not have to prove the precise manner of death to prove that Lacey was murdered and that Scott killed her. Distasto tells them the affair with Amber Fry is not the motive. The motive he says is what was about to change Scott Peterson's life, his son. Distasto continues the reason that he killed Lacey Peterson was

Connor Peterson was on the way. Then Distasto puts another photograph on the screen. It's Lacey. Seven months pregnant, smiling, beautiful, radiant, sitting by herself on a wicker chair in a red pantsuit at a Christmas party. That photograph was taken the same night, her husband and father of her baby was 96 miles away at another Christmas party with his girlfriend Amber Fry. Lacey had no idea what was coming. Distasto says. The next day, Garagos begins his closing remarks by having Scott

“faced the jury and then asking, "Do you all hate him?" Because apparently that's what the”

sum total of what we heard yesterday was. He continues, "We heard four hours of this guy's the biggest jerk that ever walked the face of the earth. This guy's the biggest liar who ever walked the face of the earth. You should hate him. You should hate him. You should hate him." Garagos tells the jury that the Modesto police settled on Scott within an hour of pulling up to his house and then went looking for evidence to fit. He says he's not asking anybody to make his client

husband of the year. At one point Garagos calls his own client a 14-carot gold asshole for cheating

state still cannot tell you the jury exactly how Lacey was killed when she was killed or even where,

“which he says undercuts their entire case. On November 3rd, the lawyers are finished.”

The case goes to the jury, 12 people walk into the deliberation room and close the door.

Two will leave and be replaced before the verdict. The first is Francis Gorman,

juror number seven, an auditor for the local gas and electric company who lives in foster city. During the five month trial, Judge Deluki had repeatedly warned the jurors not to investigate the case on their own. Gorman did, anyway. She went home, got on her computer and looked up something she had heard about in court. Francis explained what happened. "I did check something that I had a knee-jerk reaction about and it confirmed my thinking about whether something that I

heard was correct or not." Another juror reports Gorman to the court. She is called into the

“judges chambers, comes back out and then is called in again. The second time, she does not return”

to the jury room, a bailiff comes for her notebooks. Downstairs, the alternates have been sitting,

waiting for five months with laptops and stacks of DVDs, knowing they may never be called.

Alternate number two is a single mother of four from Palo Alto. Her hair is died such a vivid red that reporters have been calling her "strawberry shortcake." She has not spent a single minute in the deliberation room. Judge Deluki brings her upstairs and makes her the new juror number seven. Her name is Rochelle Neese. Press right up about her at the time speculate that she will be friendly to the defense, based on her smiling agarigos and sitting on the edge of her seat during his

questioning. They could not be more wrong. Years later, juror number one, for atlas,

“describe the moment Rochelle joined the jury to A&E. The Rochelle came in the room and Rochelle”

was just like piss and vinegar. She comes in and she's like, "Hey, he killed the little man, he's guilty, but let's just get this done with." And I was like, whoa, time out. We kind of started a process here of discussing this. Her arrival means the other 11 jurors have to throw out four days of deliberations and begin again. So they erase the whiteboard and they pull all their notes off the walls. The next morning, the foreman Gregory Jackson is gone, too. Mark Garigos told us what

happened. Deluki told me that on day seven of deliberations because the foreman of that jury came into the chambers and said he didn't feel like he'd go on in deliberations. He felt threatened. He felt like the verdict he wanted to render would not fit the communities' expectation. That's on the record. And instead of the judge, this is one of the egoists I've ever gotten with a superior court judge. Instead of bringing in the juror who was threatening the foreperson, who was

both a doctor and a lawyer, which is why I wanted the guy. I wanted somebody who was both an analytical smart. I wanted smart people. And instead of doing that, the judge removed the foreperson, removed it from the deliberations. After seven days, there was a verdict within eight hours. What the jurors actually told Judge Deluki was placed under seal. However, Jackson's statements to the judge were later unsealed in court records. The transcript reveals that he told the judge

he had lost his ability to remain fair and impartial, quote, "My individual ability to do that

has been compromised to a degree that I would never know personally whether or not I was giving

the communities verdict, the popular verdict, or the expected verdict." He told the judge, as Garagos said, that hostile remarks made to him by other jurors made him feel unsafe. Alternate juror number three is brought in to replace the foreman. His name is Dennis Lear, a retired United Airlines mechanic. For the second time in two days, the jury wipes away its work and starts over. Friday, November 12, 2004. A few hours into the new deliberations, the jurors choose a new

foreman, Steve Cardosi, a firefighter, and then he asks whether they are ready to vote to see where they are. He passes out blank pieces of paper. Three questions, Cardosi says, did Scott Peterson kill Lacy? What degree of murder for Lacy? What degree for Connor?

word goes out throughout the courthouse. There's a verdict, and it will be read after lunch.

“The trial has been running Monday through Thursday with Friday's off, and the lawyers are”

not expecting a verdict that morning. Margaragos is in another courtroom in Southern California. Scott's father, Lee Peterson, has gone home to San Diego, which is far too. So it is Pat Harris, Garagos' cold counsel, who will sit beside Scott when the verdict is read. Outside, the plaza begins to fill. San Mateo County deputies stretch a single strand of yellow tape across the courthouse steps. A police helicopter circles overhead.

When Garagos says this case was decided in the court of public opinion, long before the verdict came in, this is the moment to which he points. When Scott was found guilty, that courthouse was ringed by over 1500 people, and there was a

“front page photo of a woman holding an infant child saying, in the headline on whatever was San”

Matteo News, this is better than the birth of my son when he was convicted with the giant guilty. So it was an enormous prejudgment rate that we just could not get over. Before the verdict is read, Greg Baratless takes a moment, steps outside, and looks across the courthouse plaza. He estimates it's more than a thousand people there. Inside, Scott Peterson takes his seat at the defense table. He has lost so much weight since the trial began that his suit

hangs loosely on him. At 1 o'clock, California time, the clerk stands to read the verdict. We the jury in the Bob and Tyler cause, find a defendant, Scott Leipidesson guilty of the crime of murder of Lacy Dede's Peterson. Read the jury in the Bob and Tyler cause, find a defendant,

“Scott Leipidesson guilty of the crime of murder, a baby call and Peterson.”

Sharon Rocha begins to sob. Her son Brent puts an arm around her. Scott Peterson does not move. Two jurors would later say they watched his face as the verdict was read, waiting for some reaction. They see nothing. They see a man with no emotion. Outside the plaza erupts. When the hearing is over, the Peterson family leaves through a side entrance, and they are booed by throngs of people gathered outside. Sharon Rocha leaves through

the main entrance, once in the car with Ron Gransky, she looks back through the window at the people in the crowd and smiles. The jurors are taken to a room at street level where they can see what is

happening outside. At first, juror Dennis Lear thinks the noise is anger, then he realizes people

are celebrating. I really thought that was sick. He says later, though he spares no contempt for Scott Peterson, quote, "He got what he deserved." On November 30th, the same jury returns to decide whether Scott Peterson will spend the rest of his life in prison or die by lethal injection. Prosecutor Dave Harris calls Sharon Rocha to the witness stand. He puts a photograph on the screen. It was taken on Mother's Day 2002 at the Peterson House on Kavina Avenue. It's Sharon,

her mother, and Lacey all together and smiling. Harris asks Sharon about the Mother's Day that has just passed. How was it? Sharon tells the jury she spent much of it on the floor crying that Lacey should have been there. Lacey should have been celebrating her first Mother's Day. Then Sharon turns toward the man she once called her son-in-law who once called her mom. She wanted to be a mother. She tells him

Scott does not look up. A moment later Sharon rises from the witness chair. Divorce is always an

option, not murder. She would later say those words were not planned. She did not even realize she was shouting until people told her afterward. Then Sharon tells the jury about going to the funeral home and saying goodbye to her daughter and grandson. Garth Staples, who covered the trial for the Modesto B, later reacted to Sharon's testimony for Anne E's "The Murder of Lacey Peterson." Sharon Roach's testimony in court made a big impression on all of us. I don't know how you could

sit there and you know, observe this woman sobbing and this screaming at Scott and not be affected. Every juror is crying so or many of the reporters in the room. On December 9, Mark Garth

and that when he does he has nightmares about the case. He says he feels like he has let Scott down

“and admits he never even prepared for the possibility of a penalty phase. Then he simply begs the jury”

to spare Scott Peterson's life. After eight hours and 23 minutes of sentencing deliberations, spread across three days, the jurors returned to the courtroom with their decision. Once again, the clerk reads it out loud. "People of state of California versus Scott Peterson, we the jury in the bovintile cause, fix the penalty at death." Scott does not cry. His family sits silently behind him. Across the courtroom, Sharon Roacha weeps. Journalist and former

judge Katherine Crier is watching from the press seats. As the courtroom begins to empty, she sees Lacey's stepfather Ron Gransky turn towards Scott's father, Lee Peterson, and Mald, two words. "I'm sorry." Lee looks back at him and Mald's, two words of his own. "Fuck you."

“Outside the courthouse, the jurors face the cameras. One of the reporters asks them to describe some”

of Scott's reactions. "Jourro number seven responds." He is a jerk and I have one comment for Scott. You look somebody in the face when they're talking to you. And Rochelle Neese is not finished. "Jourro number four Mike Belmissieri joins her at the microphones." "Fanquins your new home." "And if it's illegal to kill your wife and child in California." But the mistake that would eventually take Scott Peterson off of death row had been made months earlier.

In the spring of 2004, during jury selection, a woman known only as prospective juror 4841 came to the San Mateo County Courthouse and filled out a questionnaire. Question 109 asked about her views on the death penalty. She checked "strongly opposed." A few weeks later, question 115 asked a different follow-up question. Whether those beliefs were so

strong that she could never vote for death, regardless of the evidence or the judge's instructions.

To that, she answered no. In other words, she was telling the court that she opposed the death penalty personally, but that she could still follow the law and impose it in a case where the evidence called for it. That answer should have led to more questions in court. But it didn't. Judge Delucchi excused her without asking a single follow-up question. And the judge did essentially the same thing with more than a dozen other prospective jurors. 16 years later,

Judge Delucchi's handling of those prospective jurors would wind up sparing Scott Peterson's life. An August 24th, 2020, the California Supreme Court leaves both murder convictions intact, but overturns the death sentence. The court says Delucchi improperly dismissed prospective jurors

who opposed the death penalty personally, without first asking whether they could set those

beliefs aside on behalf of the court. Delucchi was required by law to do so. Here's Garagos on the era. "You can't bounce people just because they say they can't follow the death penalty or

“there against the death penalty. You have to ask them, can you follow the law? And he didn't do that”

second thing Supreme Court unanimously reversed and actually tried it the prosecution for sitting idling by as I was screaming about it." Peterson's lawyers then tried to go further. If the jury was selected improperly, they argue, then the murder convictions should fall right alongside the death sentence. They lose that argument, which they appeal all the way up to the US Supreme Court, which in 2022 declines to hear the case. At the same time Peterson's appellate team

makes a separate attack on his conviction. This one is not about what happened during the trial

itself. His lawyers present 19 different claims involving things the jury never heard about,

including alleged new information and questions about the jurors themselves. In October 2020, the California Supreme Court rejects 18 of the 19 grounds for appeal. The 19th concerns one of the 12 people who voted to convict Scott Peterson, Rochelle niece, and results in Scott Peterson getting a trial court hearing to see if he was unfairly prejudiced by this jury. "We asked Garagos about Rochelle whom he remembered well. He compared her to the perspective

juror who said she "pulled one over on that dumb shit defense lawyer." That woman was excused.

you should play some of the video of her after the conviction. It was wild to watch her reaction

“after the conviction. She was like a crazed person who was celebrating in kind of a medieval fashion”

was wild. At the courthouse after the death verdict, Rochelle says she will "forever feel a connection with Lacey and with both families." Six months after voting to send Scott Peterson to death row, Rochelle niece begins writing to him at San Quentin. She is struggling with the aftermath of the trial. Her therapist suggests she writes Scott a letter and tell him what the case has done to her. At first, Rochelle plans to send the letter without giving Scott a return address, but she

sends it anyway, never expecting him to answer. Scott Peterson writes back. Rochelle asks him

point blank, "What happened that night, Scott? What pushed you to the limit where you felt like you had to kill someone who not only loved you so much but was carrying a part of you inside of her?" Scott tells her he did not kill Lacey or Connor. He says the Medesto police mishandled the investigation and he begins asking niece questions of his own. What it was like to be a juror and why she convicted him. In December 2005, a year after she voted to send Scott Peterson to death

row, Rochelle has a mental breakdown in a school parking lot while picking up one of her children. Rochelle writes about what happened later, quote, "I couldn't get out of my truck. All I knew is that I was done with my life. It was over." She is hospitalized in a locked psychiatric unit.

From there, she writes to Scott again. I never knew how much this trial had an impact on me.

“Plus, I never had a great life. All the pressure just hit me. I think it has been the time of year,”

our verdict, Lacey and Connor. In total, she writes 17 letters to Scott Peterson. Years later, a lawyer asks Rochelle on the witness stand, "How long the correspondence continued. She gives a short answer. I don't know. Too long." Then a reporter for People Magazine learns about the jailhouse letters. And once Scott Peterson's lawyers obtained them, they go back to the questionnaire Rochelle Nees filled out. On March 9,

2004, before she was ever seated as a juror for Scott's murder trial. It asked whether she had ever been involved in a lawsuit, whether she had ever been a party or a witness in a court case, and whether she or anyone close to her had ever been the victim of a crime.

“Nees answered no to all three. This was not true. For years earlier, on November 27, 2000,”

Rochelle Nees had gone to the San Mateo County Courthouse and asked a judge for an order of protection from her boyfriend's ex-girlfriend. She wrote that the woman had kicked in Rochelle's front door. She also wrote that she feared for her unborn child. At the time, Rochelle was four and a half months pregnant. A judge granted the restraining order. Four years later, she is sitting on a jury deciding whether Scott Peterson has murdered his pregnant wife and their unborn son.

Nees later explained her thinking to Annie. What I was filling out this questionnaire,

that case of mine never came into my thoughts, because it was a dropped case. It will never

went anywhere, and it was nothing, so I never thought about that case. In 2022, Rochelle returns to a redwood city courtroom for the court ordered hearing on her jury questionnaire. For five days under a grant of immunity, she answers questions about the form she failed out 18 years earlier. She cries on the stand, and her lawyer tells the court she regrets ever writing the letters to Scott. On December 20, the judge rules that some of Nees' answers on the questionnaire were false,

but finds that Rochelle had misunderstood the questions, not that she lied out of bias against Scott Peterson. Peterson's request for a new trial is denied. Prosecutors could have been paneled a new jury to retry the penalty phase of the trial, if they wanted to seek the death penalty again. They chose not to do so. Explaining that quote, "Lacy's family has decided the process is simply too painful to endure

once again," in December of 2021, Scott is resettin' to life without parole. The following year, he has transferred off of Death Row to Mule Creek State Prison in Ioni, California.

to a new trial for Scott, allegedly new evidence. In 2024, the Los Angeles Innocence Project takes

“Scott's case and asks the court for two things. The first is more testing. Scott's legal team”

wants to retest material from the mattress, found inside the van that was discovered burning in a Modesto alley the morning after Lacy disappeared. The state lab tested material from that mattress at the time and found no blood. In 2019, a private lab examined some of the fabric and reported trace amounts of what might be male DNA, undermining unsupported claims that the mattress might be stained with Lacy Peterson's blood. The judge grants part of this request and

denies part of it, too. She does not allow the defense to retest the mattress. Finding this van, which was orange, by the way, has no link to this crime. She does permit the defense access to certain reports about the van, like the 911 call reporting the van fire and any fingerprints

“recovered because a convicted felon has the right to review materials they would have been entitled”

to see at the time of their trial. She also allows some new DNA testing on a bit of duct tape found on Lacy's clothing. The defense is hoping for DNA that will match that of the burglars arguing that touch DNA analysis has advanced considerably since 2004. Because the tape was found on Lacy's pants and appears to be in testable condition, the judge will allow another bite at this apple. The Innocence Project also wants the court to consider 14 different arguments,

mostly involving evidence they say prosecutors destroyed or never gave to the defense. In April

of this year, a San Mateo County judge rejects all of those arguments and declines to hold a hearing on any of them. The Innocence Project says it will appeal that ruling, along with the judge's earlier refusal to grant Scott a new trial over juror number seven, aka Rochelle Neese and her juror questionnaire. Though he's not Scott Peterson's appellate lawyer, Mark Garagos fully supports a new trial. There's just too much here in the idea at this point that there was such a real

full kind of suppression of evidence. I always say the same thing. If you're beyond what you reference as the prosecutorial duty, if you truly believed in your conviction as a prosecutor,

“which also is your duty, you have to have an abiding conviction of that, which mirrors the jury.”

Why are you fighting so hard against just putting these things to rest, makes no sense to me? Scott Peterson has been in custody since April of 2003. More than 20 years later, both of his murder convictions still stand. Sharon Rochelle has devoted much of the past 20 years to helping crime victims. She wrote a book about her daughter, four Lacey, which became a best

seller. Her view of the case has never changed. This past July she told people magazine,

"He is guilty," and that's it. Scott's mom, Jackie Peterson, died of cancer in 2013, his dad Lee died in 2024. Both went to their graves maintaining that their son was innocent. Amber Fry wrote a book called "Witness for the Prosecution of Scott Peterson," then largely withdrew from public life. She still lives in the Fresno area and is the mother of two children now, Ayana born in 2001 and Justin born in 2004. She married a police officer,

Robert Hernandez in 2006, yet nothing to do with his case, before divorcing him two years later. After the court ruling this spring, she said she was relieved she would not have to testify again although she would if she had to. She told NBC a decade after the verdict that Scott made no attempts to contact her since his conviction. Lacey and Connor were buried on August 29th, 2003. At the funeral home weeks earlier, an employee named Ronnie showed Sharon albums of flowers

then photographs of caskets. When Ronnie began explaining the pillows inside of them, Sharon remembers thinking Lacey doesn't need a pillow. She chose a white casket with gold trim. On August 21st, Lacey and Connor were returned to Modesto and Connor was placed in the casket with his mother. There was still the house on Kavina Avenue and upstairs the room that had been prepared for a new baby. Lee Peterson described one piece of it to A&E in 2017. As Scott had said, we're having a

She was just so excited. I got extra hugs for that. The nursery had been finished before Lacey

“disappeared. Everything was there, waiting for a baby who would never come home.”

After Lacey and Connor died, Sharon asked for the chance to go back into that room.

She wanted to sit in Lacey's rocking chair. In the nursery, Lacey had prepared for her son

“and feel close to her only daughter. The crib was empty, the room silent.”

And on the wall, the life-preserver Lacey had been so excited to receive. Welcome aboard.

I'm Megan Kelly, and this is MK Confidential.