Dems Finally Turn Tables on GOP at Their Own Hearing

Really? I like my story, total.

“Steuere, how do you feel about it? The story is really cool.”

Yeah, I really like the idea about 1000 euros. Do you have your own connections? No, just like steuere. Wow! And that's easy? Of course, they make everything automatic.

Finally, I feel like I'm so exciting. Hold your money to go. Tie your money with like steuere. Democrats are finally rolling up their sleeves and turning the tables on Magger Republic

and Z critical congressional hearings.

So the Magger Republicans are holding a hearing to try to attack the southern poverty law center and the Magger Republicans led by Jim Jordan and the Judiciary Committee lined up their witnesses to try to attack the southern poverty law center

and say there was some grand democrat southern poverty law center conspiracy to promote extremism when in fact the southern poverty law center was out there exposing extremists who by the way Donald Trump is partnering and wants to give billions of dollars to for a corrupt

slush fund where Donald Trump's main purpose is also to waive his own tax liability for the past 20 to 30 years. But Democrats were not letting Maggers get away with it and you had the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee

Jamie Raskin really put in the dagger right into Jim Jordan same thing with Jasmine Crocket really shoving it back in Jim Jordan's face and even the Democratic witnesses or the witnesses who were called by the Magger Republicans

who they were trying to call out

ended up making very powerful presentations

and basically hit it right back in the Republican space and showed him that this hearing idea was just an absolute disaster for Republicans. Let me show you what went down so the Magger Republican witness over here

and Miss King, she was testifying and I'll let me show you what happened when Jamie Raskin was cross-examining this Magger Republican witness Alvita King watch when she's like, you want me to try to get you some evidence?

“Yeah, that's what you're here for, not to lie”

but she was just lying profusely here playing this clip. So do you pay the same people to do the bomb and then go and comfort the people from being bombed? You pay the same people to do both jobs? That's kind of fraud to me, that's weird

and chaotic and confusing. Well, Dr. King, I don't think there's any allegation that anybody who was working with the Southern Poverty Law Center bombed anyone, do you have information that effect? I don't personally, but outside agitators did bomb our house

in 63 and then ran back and took off the clue-class plans sheets and put on police things and ran up in the yard. It was a damn people, it was crazy. I'm with you, and that's a statement about the racism of that police force working with the Cooper plan.

Hey, y'all pay both of them to do the double jobs. SPLC does. I really, you harm the building, the bombing did. You're asserting a lot of things, I mean, that's weird. Dr. King, you're asserting a lot of things under

of the new oven fraught the evidence with you. So I think I get some for you. Okay, please, but bring us the evidence and I'll give it back to you Mr. Chair. I guess I'm back.

Mr. Fair did this. And when she was cross-examined, again,

“this is Jim Jordan's witness right here.”

She starts talking about, well, I'll just let the clip Judd do whatever it just happens. Watch, watch, Jamie, Raskin, cross-examiner, here, play this clip. SPLC is using.

Okay, my question is about the one proposed by Todd Blanch. Do you know it's a yes or no? I will not answer it. Mr. Fair is not feeling the babies and cutting the penises off.

And so any slip funder? I have limited time. Money in that. Is the problem? Mr. Bangard.

Now state regime media Fox was caught flatfooted when they were showing Jamie Raskin's opening statement where he used this hearing to highlight all of Donald Trump and Trump's regime a grigious corruption and extremism.

This was alive on Fox because Jim Jordan wanted this thing because Jim Jordan was like, "We're going to expose the Democrats in the southern poverty law center. But Jamie Raskin, who is the ranking member for the Democrats, is like, "No, I'm going to use this

to expose you mega criminals. You mega peto protectors. I'm going to expose you all. Watch Jamie Raskin here. Let's play it."

And now Todd Blanch wants to create

a $1.776 billion taxpayer

funded slush fund to turn the January six foot soldiers into mega millionaires. And while Blanch was at it, he signed an outrageous superpart in to give not just Donald Trump but his entire family

and all their businesses complete in total immunity from any investigation audit lawsuit or prosecution by any federal agency for any criminal or civil violation against the United States

And while systematically firing prosecutors and FBI agents

“who worked on the January six investigation,”

the largest criminal probe in American history Trump and Blanch are putting January six riders violent extremists in their closest allies in key positions throughout the DOJ. Like Jared Wise, who urge riders to kill police officers

on January six. Like Ed Martin, who defended violent copyaters both as a defense attorney and a federal prosecutor. He's been given free reign now as DOJ's pardonatory despite his long history of consorting with neo-Nazis.

Donald Trump nominated Paul Ingrossia three years out of law school to run the ethics watchdog office of the special counsel and stood by him after it was revealed that he admitted to having, quote, a bit of a Nazi streak in him. And he wrote that Martin Luther King holiday

should be tossed into the seventh circle of hell. The Department of Defense hired Elias Erazari,

“an unqualified inexperienced 24-year-old Trump loyalist”

and convicted J6 writer who was parted by the president to work on irregular warfare and counterterrorism. And so on, we understand that the extremists swamp that gave rise to this criminal indictment against the SPLC is just one more or a well in attack on the civil rights movement

and one more Kafka-esque prosecution designed to shame and ensnare the righteous and equipment and absolve the guilty. It is a tissue of lies that will join the pantheon of debunked fraudulent prosecutions that DOJ has been excoriated for by dozens of judges across the land

appointed by all different presidents. A few weeks ago, a federal judge in Rhode Island, Judge Mackleroy called the government submissions in a case misleading of not utterly false. Another judge said that DOJ attorneys

had submitted a patently false allegation to the court. Another judge rejected administration officials testimony is disingenuous, squalid and dishonorable and another court found that administration had provided a highly misleading

if not intentionally false, swore and declerations. So disingenuous that the court is left with little confidence that the United States can be trusted to tell the truth about anything. I predict it will not be long before another federal judge

casts this obscene prosecution to the wins. I'm only sorry the great name of the House Judiciary Committee has now been made in a complex to this fraud against the court in the country. You'll back to Mr. Chairman.

>> Definitely he'll just back. >> Then we heard from Democratic Congresswoman

Jasmine Crocket, who's just doing such a incredible job

in Congress and glad to have her in Congress. Just doing the hard work here. Let's play this clip. >> I hate that we have spent this much time on SPLC and we've not addressed the elephant in the room.

The literal elephant in the room. The vast majority of the people on that side of the aisle and for those of you that are at home, let me tell you when I say that side of the aisle I'm talking about the Republicans,

the ones that brought this hearing and again you've heard that this is not the first hearing. But the vast majority of our white men, white men, are lecturing people of color because the vast majority actually any semblance of diversity comes from this side of the aisle.

You want to tell people of color who is fighting for who? People of color do not feel comfortable or welcome within your party.

“That's why you have to parade someone who has the name Dr. King.”

Attach to them so that people can be confused because I have been reading the comments online. And people are like who is this Dr. King? Because you want them to believe that somehow she espouses. Who Dr. King was yet you've yet to have,

MLK, the third come in here. You've yet to have Dr. Bernice King. The ones that were actually raised by Dr. King. The ones that actually probably understand the teachings of Dr. King. Then you had Jim Jordan tried to cross examine the witness who he was trying to embarrass.

So he called the interim director of the Southern Poverty Law Center. This guy by the name of Fair.

And Jim Jordan was like, "So you wish you never did this Southern Poverty Law Center program

where you worked with informants in order to uncover these extremist groups. That's why you canceled the program." And then the Southern Poverty Law Center, him, had his like, "No, we don't do it anymore because at this point the extremists are so embedded in the Trump government and the Trump regime that running an informant program is kind of useless.

when literally the guy in the Oval Office who's out there turning the White House law into a freaking junkyard for a UFC fight. The guy who's destroying this country and pardoning January 6th insurrectionists

“and literally having them work at high level positions in the national security apparatus?”

Yeah, we know who it is, it's you. It's you, it's the mag, it's Jim Jordan. Watch as he brilliantly flips the script. Let's play this clip. I'm not suggesting in general, I'm not saying it.

Well, it's one thing you've said you've had informant head field sources. If you have informants and field sources there, that's one thing. But the indictment says that these informants and field sources were encouraging other people to attend these hate rallies. And I'm saying, okay, so you don't have to answer that specific.

But is that a good thing in general? Again, all the allegations in the indictment. Do you wish German Jordan? Okay. We'll be addressed.

>> What you had to do in the program, you said the program was successful, helpful, but now you're stopping it. >> We stopped the program because we believe hate and extremism has migrated significantly online into government agencies. Wow, that's, that's, that's, that's, that's makes no sense. >> The chair now recognizes. >> Mr. Chairman, I've got a UC request of the sorry.

>> John Lincoln, say as you see requests.

>> Okay, first asking them to set to introduce this article about whether in fact people have been driven from public square.

Twenty twenty five was a banner year for alliance defending freedom. It wasn't just that hearing in the day as well, despite the macro Republicans trying to do everything they can to cover up Donald Trump's dark past. And to engage in this protection of the pedo ring, the Epstein files that Donald Trump and the Epstein class in the magas want to do. There was still a interview. The Democrats are chopping wood on this investigation.

They're not going to let James Colmer and maga get away with everything. And so even though James Colmer is now like not doing hearings under oath anymore, and he's just doing these interviews, Democrats are able to get the interview of an individual by the name of graph. And graph was the assistant to Epstein. And so she appears in the files, Leslie graph appears in the Epstein files about 167,000 times.

Jeffrey Epstein said that Leslie graph was like his right hand. She's a co-conspirator. And so the Democrats were interviewing her. And she admitted that she would set up these interviews between her.

“Epstein and Donald Trump, which I think is a pretty important admission.”

What are you trying to uncover with guilty? What was testimony about it? Well, today we had a misgraph who's actually still testifying right now to the community. She's giving us, in fact, I think, a lot of names of staff employees folks that work in the Epstein orbit. She worked for Epstein for 18 years.

So she's being asked. I think some very tough questions, right? We saw about what you knew, who she's scheduled appointments with. She's scheduled massages. We know that.

And so that's being asked for her right now. We're going to go back to what you're over. But then if Mr. Gates, we've said, we don't care if you are a Republican or a Democrat or who you are. The fact that Mr. Gates still had a relationship with Mr. Epstein, even after knowing about the conviction, knowing what he had done, I think he's very concerning.

So we want to know what a Mr. Gates know. Who else was around that orbit? And why Mr. Gates continued to have a relationship with Mr. Epstein. I think those are important questions. That was Democratic Congress member Garcia right there.

Now I'll show you, you know, James Comer was here as well.

Here's what James Comer had to say.

Let's play it. We put in a former request to have what you had to talk lunch.

“So you know, are you going to act on that speaking?”

No, we'll talk lunch become-- You know, talk lunch came to speak to us for a briefing. And the Democrats got up and tiptoed out and ran to the press, collection their furls in outbreak. What a wasted opportunity.

We had talk lunch and Pam Margie in there. And they didn't ask talk about your single question. But the Republican state, we did our job. And we asked blank questions for two hours, blank in body.

So, you know, it's never enough for Republicans.

I have a question, I think you all should ask Garcia and walking shall and all their members that come out and complain and their outreach.

Things like the body that you all have a change in it.

What was the problem? They say stuff to try to create a false narrative. They have an opportunity to ask questions people. And they refuse because they just pull stunts to try to get on TV. We are doing a substance investigation.

I would argue the most thorough investigation ever because the more evidence that. Look, if you're in this community, you're paying attention. You know what's happening. And a lot of what's happening.

It's directly affecting your Medicare. Plans are being discontinued. Premiums are going up.

And the broker you might have talked to,

probably pushing Medicare advantage plans, even if they aren't right for you.

“That's why I want you to know about chapter.”

They're the only advisors who compare every Medicare plan in the country. Thousands of people from this community have already used them. One viewer, Kevin and Florida, is saving $2100 a year. Another Steven finally has a plan that covers his dialysis.

And for the mightest mighty, a call with chapter is free and takes just 20 minutes. So if you're on the right plan, they'll tell you. And if not, they'll help you find a plan that fits your needs. I want you to know that we've gotten such incredible feedback

from the mightest mighty about chapter. Frankly, it is overwhelming the positivity that is out there for chapter. And so I'm so glad to be affiliated with it. I'm so glad you're all having great experiences.

So call 82 Medicare today to speak with chapter. That is 82 Medicare and feel confident in your Medicare coverage.

So here's what Congresswoman Ansari had to say about the interview

with Leslie Graff, who is Jeffrey Epstein's assistant. Let's play this clip. You know, she did as she was told. She really, you know, is saying essentially that she was naive. Didn't know better, did not think anything of it.

She was calling and booking predominantly in New York as what she says. She didn't manage most of what happened in Palm Beach or in New Mexico. She also had, you know, five or six traveling assistants. So that's people like Sarah Kellin, who of course came before us. And she herself was a victim and says she was a victim.

But Leslie does not have that same story. She says she was never abused or assaulted by Epstein that there was nothing romantic or sexual in nature there at all. And yes, she scheduled all of this calls with important high profile people. But as I left the room being asked about setting up calls with Donald Trump before their alleged

fallout. And she said that she did that about once a quarter before that time period.

“And did she know anything about the tender of their conversations?”

Did she reveal any of that? She would reveal nothing about that said she didn't know. I mean, the number of times that the interview will come out as it does in form of a transcript. You will see the words, I don't recall. I don't know.

No, I wasn't aware many, many, many, many, many, many times. Understood. Congressman, you mentioned that 2008 agreement that Epstein reached with federal prosecutors. Obviously a controversial in its own right. But it includes a clause that it would not bring any charges against any potential

co-conspirators, including Leslie Graff. Did she answer questions about that? Why was her name included in this non prosecution agreement? My recollection is that she said she did not know. She was not aware.

And Sarah Kellins had a very similar thing that she found out about it after the fact. I think there needs to be an independent investigation into this non prosecution agreement from 2008. I think Alex Acosta when he came before the committee made very clear. At least in my view, it was very clear that he was lying. Then the Midas Touch Network was able to catch up with.

Mager Republican Congress member Rob Whitman, who faked a phone call for roughly 90 seconds after being asked about Mager Mike Johnson's comments about cutting social security. You can see the phone screen remain visible with his cheek inadvertently tapping different parts of his display. Midas Touch on Capitol Hill for you. Watch as we caught up with Mager Republican Congress member Rob Whitman, who literally ran away from us here play this clip.

“Congressman, what is Mike Johnson's secret plan to cut social security?”

Hey, how you doing? I'm good with that. Yeah, I'll be there just a few minutes. No response. I'm heading in your way right now.

Yeah, it's over right. For 16. Congressman, what is Mike Johnson's secret plan to cut social security?

I've got some more efforts that I'm going to talk to you about. There are actually more things that we have to be working on. Yeah, I want to make sure that we're. When I respond, sir. Yeah, listen, thanks.

I appreciate your help on this. I really, really do need. We do need some more, some more of your info. If you can, if you can actually reach out, I'll make sure that we do more of this. Yeah, let's not really, really appreciate it.

Thank you. Mm-hmm. Yes. Yes, I believe I understand. There's more and more of those things that they need to work with.

Yes. Yeah. Thank you. Thanks again. I appreciate it.

Thank you.

“Congressman, what is Mike Johnson's secret plan to cut social security?”

Yes. And just so you know what he was responding to. What we were asking him? We were asking questions that mega Mike Johnson was saying that he wants to cut social security. Let's play it.

We're going to lead up to what we have to do and address the largest spending items. The thing the reason we're in trouble is because over 74% of federal spending is on autopilot, mandatory spending. That's your entitlement programs like Medicare Medicaid and then things like so security. They have to be adjusted and fixed.

We have a plan to do that next year and it's critical.

And mega Mike was also running away from members of the press. Mega Mike said the following about Donald Trump strikes on Iran, which have now further created calamity here in the United States. Let's play it. What about on Iran? What about Iran?

He says they're going to respond on Iran. Do you have a sense of whether there'll be a new bombing campaign? And why shouldn't Congress weigh in if there is another bombing campaign? I don't know what the reaction is going to be. But obviously Iran cannot be firing on us.

It's a serious problem. And then mega Republican Senator Thune was asked about it as well.

Here's what he had to say.

Well, I think that senators tend to be kept in the loop on what the administration is doing for the most part.

“I think sometimes the, you know, you have to make decisions in real time that have national security implications.”

And so I don't expect we're going to hear every single move that's made by the administration. But I do think what we want to see is them succeed. And I think right now is a critical juncture in terms of the presence negotiations with the Iranians. And so I hope at least that our members are inclined to continue to support the administration's efforts to strike a deal there. That is good not only for our country, but for our allies in the region.

And frankly, for that matter, for the whole world, a nuclear Iran is not. Meanwhile, Democratic Congress member Roger Christomorthy was asked about Leslie Graff on MSNBC. Here's what he had to say. Well, in the meantime, let's talk about what's happening tomorrow. You have Leslie Graff coming in and read this from the Guardian, the title of the piece.

Very telling, seriously, the best boss ever inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein's assistant. Graff worked for Epstein for 18 years from 2001 until his arrest in July 2019. Compared to the Royals, politicians, billionaires, and professors who have featured in the Epstein files. Graff is low status, a non-selebrity with no public reputation to lose. But when you search for her name in the files, you receive more than 160,000 results more than anyone else.

Why is she of interest? What can she tell you? What do you want to know from her? Well, Jeffrey Epstein himself said that she was an extension of his brain. That he was some kind of prosthesis to her.

And she was the one that scheduled all the massages, which was codeword for sex. She met with all the underage minors. We have emails. My staff was showing me the emails where she's emailing these girls who were in school talking about their school schedules. So for her to claim that she didn't know that they were underage.

I'm sorry. You had the emails conquested? Yeah, we were in the files.

“Is this the unredacted version of the redacted version?”

So parts of it are redacted. But enough of it is clear as to what the messages are. And they're talking about their orchestra schedules and stuff like that. I mean, she clearly knew they were underage.

She knew about the 2008 conviction for where he basically was convicted of solicitation of underage minors.

And I want to give a hat tip to our very own Katie Fang, who's filed a lawsuit against the Trump regime and the Trump DOJ for their cover up of the Epstein files.

“And Katie Fang is demanding the release of the Epstein files.”

Here's what she had to say about Leslie Graff and what went down on Capitol Hill.

Let's play it tomorrow. Tomorrow June 9th before House over site in a transcribed interview, not one under oath, not one that is videotaped and not one that is public. The long time executive assistant for Jeffrey Epstein will provide information to members of Congress. Her name is Leslie Graff.

It's spelled L-E-S-L-E-Y-G-R-O-F-F.

“This woman's name appears more than 167,000 times in the existing rollout of the Epstein files, as currently illegally and improperly redacted by the Trump Department of Justice.”

I'm going to say that again. 167,000 times Leslie Graff's name appears in the Epstein files. She worked for Epstein from February of 2001 until July of 2019. I want you to think about the fact that that is 1819 years of employment as Jeffrey Epstein's closest executive assistant. I am talking somebody who know the intimate day in and day out of this man's schedule.

They had access to information about this man's life, in schedule, travel, et cetera. Somebody who also had access to directories of contacts, politicians, royalty, Hollywood, political elite. I mean, business people, academics, I mean, you name it. This woman had access to all this information. And yet, and yet, she insists she had no idea what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. She had no idea that he was sexually abusing children.

She had no idea that he was running a multi-decade international sex trafficking ring. She also interacted with Glenn Maxwell. Let me be clear. She also claims as a graph claim she has no idea about Glenn Maxwell being complicit and also a participant in this multi-decade international sex trafficking ring. It defies logic and reality. And yet, ladies and gentlemen, here we are. There you have it, folks. Let me know what you think.

Hit subscribe. Let's get to 7 million subscribers and thanks for watching.

Everybody, we appreciate you.

“If you want to stay plugged in, become a subscriber to our sub-stack at mitisplus.com.”

You'll get daily recaps from Runfield Cowsky, add three episodes of our podcast and more exclusive content. Only available at mitisplus.com.