Fox News Panics on Air as Trump Chokes on World Stage!!!

For $299, I'll bring you a pizza with sushi. Mmm, lecher.

“And for $199, I'll give you a little bit of ice cream.”

For all the news, you'll always get it.

Pretty good? Then try the snack time-sushi box at $225 for $299. Or mochi sandwich ice. $8 for $199. That's good for all of you at the price.

Now in your filial. Alrighty, what is filial? State regime media which calls itself Fox has been in complete collapse mode as Donald Trump's trip to China has been in utter failure. So state regime media has been running segments like this one right here.

On the Laura Ingraham show, she brings on this guy, Arroyo, as a guest and they both say, "Wow, do you see how dominant Donald Trump was in his handshake with G?" Watch as Donald Trump gives G's hand a little swat, such dominance. What are you talking about here, play this clip? Yeah, you know, I did see it, Laura, and that people online were saying G dominated Trump

in that closing moment of their summit because of the handshake, but look at what Trump does. He gives the hand G's hand a little swat to diminish whatever that dominant move was at the top. Trump is very aware in these settings of how he goes in for the swat.

He always is very aware of these images and how those images define these historic moments

and you could see him look the pattern, the shoulder, all the dominant moves to counter G.

“I think the online commentary was a little awful on this moment.”

Well, also, Trump just looked really relaxed. He did seem at all tight and I mean, did you notice if she ever moved to his face, I mean, his face does not move, it's like immovable, it's like Trump on tariffs, it's like Trump on tariffs, it's over. So Donald Trump basically gave away our semi-conductor chips, gave away any negotiating leverage regarding Taiwan, gave away any negotiating leverage around prisoners who America

wants release from China, gave away all economic leverage, but he swatted Xi Jinping, what are you talking about? And then fortunately, you had Jessica Tarlov on Fox, who's like one of their only good hosts on the show, she points out that Donald Trump is making what at least $220 million dollars, last quarter alone selling stocks to which Jesse Waters, the Fox prop again,

is goes so did I, didn't we all make that amount of money? Know the American people are suffering, people can't afford things, we have the highest credit card delinquency rates in history, the highest student loan delinquency in history, all time low consumer confidence right now, what are you talking about? This is what they're saying on Fox as Donald Trump's trip was an utter failure, here

they're playing this clip.

But we're just, I mean, we just saw that Donald Trump and Q1 made at least a $220 million

of purchases in stocks, paramount Netflix, Warner Brothers, Palantir. What did I? He isn't good. Everyone is like control, but your talk should not be able to do that.

“You want to talk about Nancy Pelosi's tolenty, gelato drawer?”

Okay, I'm going to tell you what's going on here. I know it's important to point out also that they can knock it this stuff past on Capitol Hill. People people show it. It's not.

He just said, oh, that's a good point. No, that's not what I said. That's okay. You did not. They're great.

That's a good point. But also can we talk about the fact that Capitol Hill can knock it together on inside our stock trading and all that kind of stuff. These are the first president to do it and they're thousand dares and they leave as millionaires in a way on a salary that doesn't make a lot of sense.

So when you have billion dollars in a year, you don't even have to ask me a question. Then one of the things they do at Fox is just they assume if you speak loud and you behave obnoxiously, you can then drown out logic. No, because people know you are con artist. No one's buying this stick, but I want you to watch as Greg Gutfeld.

One of Fox's hosts, he starts saying, you know, look, you limbs, you limbs are so delusional, you limbs love ball rooms, you just want you just want taxpayers to pay for the ball rooms. When taxpayers are in pain for you, love, I don't even know what you're saying. You're playing this clip.

First things first, a Democrat gets into power and then gets rich. Trump was rich before he got there and he's actually making less money. So your obsession over his profiting is a delusion. It's what you hear. First you say, here's how they're profiting.

Then you switch to his foreign policy priority where he's saying, I ran is more important

That was your justification. Then you move back. It was so convoluted. Look, lips have obsessions over things like ball rooms. When taxpayers aren't paying for it, meanwhile, as Jesse points out, and I got to make

this clip, because this is going to come back, there is a pattern of abuse. More from Tarlov pointing out Donald Trump's grifter right here, and I want you to watch as gut-fell basically admits, yeah, so what's wrong about using your presidency to profit and make billions of dollars. Watch this.

Let's play this clip.

But we're just, I mean, we just saw that Donald Trump and Q1 made at least a $220 million

of purchases and stocks paramount, Netflix, Warner Brothers Palantir. What did I say? What did I say? Every month, I can trust. But you're talking.

You should not be able to do that. You want to tell me that? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know.

I'm a little bit scared of what's going on here. I don't know.

“It's important to point out also that they cannot get this stuff passed on Capitol Hill.”

People show it. It has to go. You just said, "Oh, that's a good point." No. That's not what I said.

It's like the addresses. You did not. They are great. That's not what I said. But also could be talk about the fact that Capitol Hill can knock it together on insider

stock trading and all that kind of stuff. These are so many of them. I said, "He's the first president to show up there and they're $1,000 in they leave as millionaires. In a way, on a salary that doesn't make a lot of sense."

So when you talk a billion dollars in here, you don't even have to ask me a question.

And then as Fox was in full collapse mode, you had Democratic Congress member, Rokana, going on Fox and bringing the fight directly to Fox host. So you had Maria Bardaroma who tried to -- she thought that she was going to act all tough and she was going to get Rokana. But Rokana, cool, calm, confident, push back.

“And you know Donald Trump told Maria Bardaroma to do this interview, right?”

Because remember Donald Trump said that Jackie Heinrich who did the interview last Sunday was too weak. So Trump called Bardaroma and arranged this and had Bardaroma invite Rokana on and Bardaroma got destroyed by Kana. Let's watch what goes down.

Story. We just did the story in New York. How cat the huckle is moving the threshold down. You're going to pay a pina tear tax if you have a second home in New York. Not if your house is worth $5 million dollars, no, no, no, no, your house is valued at $1

million.

Then you're going to pay a pina tear tax if you have a second home in New York.

Do you agree with that? Yes, because you don't what I believe Maria is that the economy in this country is unfair and lopsided. Two people. Two people.

Two people. Let me say this, and you may agree with me, look, you can't have a country where a few people in a few places control the majority of the nation's wealth. That's not a democracy and it's not sustainable in world history.

“You've seen revolution when that happens.”

It's Silicon Valley, you have 19 billionaires who have 12% of the economy, so what I'm saying is the market has been good to you. If America has been good to you, you can do good for America. You can pay a little bit of tax, so people will have care, child care, living wage. And they do.

They can pay a little bit of money, they spend money. Hey, I know plenty of billionaires, all they do is spend money. Do you know if all the other people are wealthy? They said money to education, they spend money on arts, they said all their money, they said all their money to all of these non-profits.

I know plenty of billionaires that don't sell. But they have an obligation to pay some tax so that we can have the public one to help the child care and education. And education. The majority of it.

But they're not paying. The majority of it said they don't. Warren Buffett is saying, no, Warren Buffett has said, that's not true. He was talking Buffett. That's not true.

I know exactly what Warren Buffett is saying, why is he talking about capital gains taxes. He was not talking about income tax, but he said, he pays less tax. No, he pays less tax than his teachers. He's not getting a salary. He's not getting a salary.

And that's most of the billionaires. And that's most of the billionaires that can be taxed. You're a mixing up tax. So what you want to do is don't try it. You don't want to do it.

So would you agree that we shouldn't have in this kind of wealth inequality in an AI world, which is capital-wise, that we shouldn't have millionaires plus having less rates on capital gains, then someone who's a teacher or a farmer or a businessman is paying on their doubt. I don't want to crush things. We don't want to be with you.

We're correct. I want people to pay a question. I want people to pay an investment into, they're not going to put it down for one K. The way to create wealth overall long-term is to invest in the stock market. That's 100% I believe that the way to long-term people don't do that.

And then Rho Khan opposed it his own clip from his appearance.

I went on mornings with Maria Barteroma on Fox to make the case for ending the war in Iran that is devastating our economy. It's why food, gas, credit card rates, and mortgages are all up. Let's put American workers over far in entanglement. Rho Khan is a superstar here.

Play this clip.

“But I mean, how much pressure can you put on this president at this point?”

I mean, you are just voting on everything against the president. The Democrats can't stay in president Trump when do you see a time to start working together? Absolutely, but you know, one of the things a president should do is end this war. I mean, three Republicans voted with us and the war here's why the war is really hurting us. You talked about the Fed not cutting rates.

Part of the reason they can't cut rates is because of the war and prices and what does that mean?

Higher mortgages, higher credit card interest rates, higher student loans.

And then you see the cost of food and the cost of gas and the cost of farmers of Korea, ammonia, nitrogen and their fertilizers, let's end this war to bring down prices. Then you had Rho Khan a fact checking Maria Bartiroma to her face that's watched this right here. But of course, we did let it get this and we already went through this before that President

Obama actually sent Iran money as opposed to actually President Trump trying to stop them from having a nuclear weapon. But I want to get your take on what China said because the president is making news right now. He just spoke on Air Force 1 to reporters and he said that China agreed to buy 200

Boeing planes with the potential commitment of buying 750 jets. He also said that China agreed to buy soybeans and he said that he would consider lifting sanctions on Chinese companies purchasing oil, but no decision has been made yet. Now the president said that he did get a commitment from Xi Jinping that China would buy oil from America.

We don't know if that's they're going to keep that promise, but he said they're going to send Chinese ships to Louisiana and Texas to buy American oil. And then on Taiwan, they were all the things said, but let me get your take on those deals. Right now, what is your assessment of this trip? Sure.

I just have to say for the record, my view is the president of all that didn't give money to Iran. He unfrozen Iranian assets when we can have that conversation in some other time. So let me say on Boeing, I'm glad that China is buying a Boeing plane, but can I just wait?

Why unfreeze assets? Why give Iran that the leading state sponsor of terrorists $2 billion so that they

“could go give that money to the proxies that they support, like Hezbo and Hamas?”

Why unfreeze money? It was Iranian money that was unfrozen, we were 97% of in rich uranium to get out of the country President Trump for that deal up. Now there's tons of in rich uranium.

They never made a commitment to stop building a weapon.

So why send them $1.7 billion when you didn't even have a commitment to stop building a weapon. You yourself said you don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. We're just a were factual. He didn't send their money.

There money that was unfrozen, I acknowledge it was unfrozen, why have we got it? You say it was there. But we got it out of there. Well, we got it out of there. Well, we got it out of there money.

It was stolen money. It is there money. Why unfreeze the money that you never got a commitment that they would stop building a nuclear weapon?

“Why are you sending them $1.7 billion so that they could go give it to Hamas?”

You got to give it to Hamas. It's 15 for 15 for 15 years, 97% of rich uranium out instead, what did we get? We had that in having 60% in rich uranium when Trump tore up the deal. We had 13 American service members dead. We have an American's paying four bucks a year.

I'm talking about the food price. I don't even have food price, so let me just send it for you. Let me just send it for you. Let me just send it for you. Are you talking about the botched and it's from Afghanistan?

Well, they were nothing to do with Iran's, the botched and it was so funny. But look at the facts here, because from tore up the deal, Americans are dead, Americans are paying more for food, Americans are paying more for gas. And again, this is just pitch perfect right here. Let's play this clip.

But look at the facts here, because from tore up the deal, Americans are dead, Americans are paying more for food, Americans are paying more for gas. The straight up for music is less secure. And the war is unpopular, 70% of Americans don't want this war, even Republicans are that's fake.

Nobody wants it. It's just gross, I don't know how to do it. Well, let's show you what you're trying to. You want a nuclear terrorist to have a nuclear weapon, okay? We don't want a terrorist to have a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a terrorist to have a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon.

We don't want a nuclear weapon. We don't want a nuclear weapon. We wrote the law that compelled the release of the Epstein files to aka Trump campaign promise. After ignoring the Epstein case from 2006 to 2018, the New York Times coverage of the

files has been sterling. Holding several teen girl didlers to account, leading to force resignations, tens and millions of dollars in forfitted compensation, lifetime financial industry bans, lawsuits not to mention public humiliation and ostracism.

“That's why Conna and the New York Times respect, Massey.”

You complete shit for brains, waste of prodoplasm, defender of teen sex abuse. And it's one of these right wing accounts that said, "Look at all the free PR that mainstream media is giving to RhoConan Thomas Massey." I'll just give a hat tip to RhoConan for posting this from Bernie Sanders, right? Let me just leave you with this.

'Cause I just RhoConan reposted this. When I talk about oligarchy, I'm not just referencing the extraordinary concentration of ownership in our economy. I'm not just talking about the unprecedented level of income and wealth inequality or the increased billionaire control of our media.

I'm talking about how the very, very rich and their super PACs are now buying our political system and undermining the very foundation of American democracy.

And the 2024 election Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, spent at least $290 million

to elect Trump. In that campaign, the 100 richest people in the country spent $2.6 billion to elect the candidates of their choice. And now as we enter the 2026 elections, we're seeing billionaire spend far more money and a midterm election than any time in history.

It is estimated that super PACs from the AI industry, crypto, A-PAC, and other special

“interests could spend billions of dollars to elect senators and members of Congress who represent”

their interests. New as a citizen get one vote. They as oligarchs get to buy the candidates. That's not democracy. That's the government of the United States becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the billionaire

class. The Epstein class, I would say. If we're going to create a government that works for all and not just the one percent, we have to end citizens united, get super PACs out of elections, and move to the public funding of elections.

There you have it. We're O'Connor repost that. So I wanted to share that with you. Hit subscribe.

Let's get to $7 million subscribers.

Thanks for watching everybody. Thanks for watching. Be sure to add the minus touch podcast on apple podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast for new updates every single day.