Major red flags are surfacing after Trump's White House released at 11pm on F...
A document that it claimed was the medical report in connection with Donald Trump's
“physical at Walter Reed from earlier this week. Obviously, red flag number one,”
releasing a document that you claim is the medical report at 11pm on Friday. But there are so many red flags in this document. I want to go through it with you page by page so you can see that there is a lot of highly suspicious information here. As you go through this document, you see it was prepared by someone named Sean Barberella and it was sent in the form of a letter to Donald Trump's Chief Propagandist Caroline Levitt.
You'll notice from looking at this, it doesn't contain any of the diagnostic testing. It doesn't contain any of the raw data. It is simply a summary. And when you look at it,
“it starts to talk about the vital statistics. It says that Donald Trump's weight is 238 pounds.”
I noted that as something interesting because in the previous physical that Donald Trump took on April 13, 2025, his weight was 224 pounds. So he gained 14 pounds and that's not noted in the report right here. When you go to the section that says annual physical examination and diagnostic summary, it says examination was normal except for scarring of the right ear consistent with prior gunshot injury. Hearing his intact teeth are in very good condition. I highlighted here,
consistent with prior gunshot injury and teeth are in very good condition. If you got shot in the face by an AR-15 or shot in the ear by an AR-15, your ear is blown off. You don't have a little scratch if you get shot in the face by an AR-15 bullet. Can we exercise a mode of calm of common sense? His ear is not consistent with that of someone shot in the face by an AR-15. Let's just say that as he continues to cover up the medical records and what actually took place in Butler.
And it says his teeth are in very good condition. I'm just going to give you my opinion, but if you look at his teeth, it looks like there's been a lot of work done, it looks like there are veneers, but you can form your own opinions. Then it goes to the next section on page two cardiac, coronary CT, angiography, demonstrated no arterial obstruction or structural abnormalities of the heart or major vessels. So in other words, they're saying another CT scan was performed
“of the heart area. Remember the prior annual physical, which turned out was a semi-annual”
physical back in October of 2025 after the April 2025 physical where at first Trump's doctor said
he got an MRI and they said it was a CT scan and they said it was a preventative CT scan of the abdomen, which is not a thing that actually happens. But so he did another coronary CT scan over here. And then it says over here, in addition, AI enhanced electro, electrocardiogram analysis estimated his cardiac age and established measure of cardiovascular vitality to be approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age. So this whole idea of an AI enhanced electrocardiogram
analysis saying that your cardiac age is 14 years younger and is chronological age.
Any doctor, any cardiologist, any doctor, would never put this in a report right here. That's not a
thing. You don't put this in a medical report. That's not a viable exam to say your heart is 14 years younger than your chronological age. So from all the doctors I talked to that raised a major red flag, also that he got another CT scan of the heart area in abdomen as well. Then you go to the neurological area. What's notable here, which lots of doctors are telling me, is that there actually is no, there's no testing here to actually test for dementia or to test for real cognitive
decline. They give him the MOCA exam, the Montreal cognitive assessment exam, the MOCA exam. That's the one where he says it's a bird. It's an elephant. It's a cow. And I can tell the difference between
A squirrel, a bird, a cow.
MOCA six, seven times, you're taking the same exam over and over and over and over again. And the testing
“isn't really a valuable testing for cognitive decline and dementia after you take the same”
thing six or seven times now because he says he takes it again right here. Then they claim he got a 30 out of 30 on it. Okay. Well, then show the underlying data and results versus just saying that. And it says dermatologic examination of the dorsal hands revealed bruising, consistent with minor soft tissue irritation relating to frequent hand shaking in the setting of aspirin use for cardiovascular prevention. This represents a common and benign effect of aspirin
therapy, no suspicious lesions or concerning growths identified. There are lots of concerning marks
on the guys hands on the guys neck. And the same way you're trying to gaslight us and say that a scratch on his ear or that the way his ear is as consistent with a gunshot to the ear. No, it isn't. What are you talking about? It's the same way over here. You're saying that shaking hands creates a situation where your hands are literally discolored and disfigured. The way he is because he shakes a lot of hands to stop it. And again, that raises massive red flags right there as well.
“Then it says current medications. It only lists three in a less aspirin. I think it's lacking a lot of”
medications that are missing, but that's just my own view right there. Then it goes and says for preventative
care. It goes on to say preventative counseling was provided, including guidance on diet, recommendation to take a low dose aspirin, increase physical activity, and continued weight loss. But he has weight gain year over here. And I still, I think we all think he's far heavier. I think we all believe than 238. So in his April 2025, he was 224, April 26 now. He's 238. In my opinion, you tell me, you've looked at the guy. I think he's probably 305 to 315,
just eyeballing him. Maybe more. But I think he's at least 300 pounds. I'm just giving you my evaluation. You could disagree with it. But they act like he's losing weight. He gained weight.
“And he's probably closer to 300 pounds in my video in my opinion. And it says summary,”
Trump remains an excellent health, demonstrating strong cardiac pulmonary neurological and overall physical features. His demanding daily schedule, including multiple high-level meetings, public engagements, and regular physical activity continues to support his overall well-being, cognitive and physical performance are excellent. He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the commander and chief in the head of state. And again, we see him falling asleep throughout the day.
So there is no mention at all here. Let's talk about what's omitted. What's omitted is, there's no mention at all that he consistently falls asleep throughout the day. And we all see that. That's not normal. That's not healthy behavior. And that shows that there's a lot of major issues that are taking place. That's not addressed here. And then also, when you look through this report, and it talks about how a thorough review of diagnostic studies, 22 specialty providers
from multiple academic institutions were involved. Okay. He showed up to Walter Reed based on what he claimed for about two hours, three hours. So I'm not sure where the 22 specialist providers were. But okay, you're saying there are 22 specialists who are there evaluating him. Well, then let's take a look at their underlying data. Then each one of these things, we could dispel any major issues. If you just produce the raw data, the underlying data,
if you show what the results of the CT scan are, then we could believe the CT scan. But when you say, uh, his ears consistent with being your ear blown off and your hand is that's consistent with handshakes. And it's grueling schedule shows that he's healthy. And then you omit these glaring things. Then you go, his cardio vascular age is 50 is AI, his artificial intelligence, cardio vascular age, is 15 years younger than his chronological age. Okay. He's clearly then writing this himself. Like
he's clearly, he's clearly doing his himself. So so speaking of which, remember when Donald Trump
Was running for office in 25, 20, 20, 20, 15, 20, 16, he would write the medi...
Remember the doctor, boarstein, um, the Trump's doctor, he who mysteriously died in 2021. And that doctor talked about and told CNN how Donald Trump would write his own medical reports and
“Trump would force the doctors to write the medical reports. Remember what Dr. Borenstein said?”
This was Trump's done. So when I remind you during Trump's first term,
Trump's doctor then who mysteriously died in 2021 said the following to to see and I believe play this clip. And we ran into Dr. Held Borenstein right out right here, right outside his office on Park Avenue. And he told us in no one certain terms. And this is the quote, Aaron. He dictated he being Trump. He dictated that whole letter. I didn't write that letter. Meaning the Trump dictated what he wanted to go into it and essentially Borenstein wrote it up. He did say he compared it to the movie Fargo.
And he said, it takes the truth and moves it in a different direction. Think about that. Now Borenstein tells us that he was in a car with his wife when he was on the phone,
uh, within candidate Trump in December of 2015. And he was going through with a Trump,
what he could say and what he couldn't say. Trump was dictating what he wanted in that letter. And Borenstein was saying, okay, you can say that. You can't say that. Okay, then came here to the office. You wrote it up. Trump's office later picked it up. He said around 4 p.m. Aaron, we have reached out to the White House. But we have not got the response. And then he said, uh, then just he, he, he also talked about his office then being rated
by Donald Trump's thugs and Donald Trump's goons rated his office here play this clip. Exactly what they're looking for. Well, as medical records just pictures anything I could find. We must have been here for 25 or 30 minutes who created a lot of chaos. I couldn't believe anybody was making a big deal about a drug that's to grow to grow his hair, which seems to be so important. And it certainly is not a breach of medical trust.
“It tells somebody they take real patient and grow their hair. What's the matter with that?”
I'll remind you too, though, on Donald Trump's April 2025, medical report when it had the summary, uh, the same doctor over here, Dr. Barabella, who prepared the report that I just showed you from May, which was released at 11 p.m. on Friday night. It says, uh, Trump's days include participation in multiple meetings, public appearances, press availability, and frequent victory in golf events. Trump exhibits excellent cognitive
and physical health and has fully fit to execute the duties of commander and chief and head of state. And so he wrote frequent victories in golf. That was removed from this one because I guess they figured even even by all accounts. That one was too much for the, for the prior, for the prior report. So let me just share with you, with Dr. Reiner, world renowned cardiologist had to say as well.
“And I think he has some of the same assessments. He's a doctor. I'm an doctor. I'm a law professor”
and a lawyer. I did lots of cases where I would cross examine doctors when I would do trials. I would take depositions of doctors and many of my cases. So I probably have done hundreds of
examinations of questioning of doctors in high-profile cases. But here's what Dr. Reiner says
on Trump's exam, here play this clip. And recommended. What's interesting to me also is that the report mentions that the precedent was underwent a coronary artery CT scan, which is a very useful test, except he had that in the fall. And it's not typically a test that has done every, every six months. It's sometimes done more frequently if someone is having symptoms. We don't know if he's having any symptoms because the exam doesn't list what we call
a review of symptoms, where you review of systems, where you go through system by system with the patient and ask them questions like, "Are you having headaches? Are you having any short of some breath? You get chest pain, abdominal pain, etc." So there's no really description of a review of systems in this note. But it does mention that again, they scan to him. So my question is are they surveilling him for a concern? Are they doing serial CT scans at his heart because
they have an ongoing concern? That's not listed in the note. Then you have Laura Cotes and Dr. Reiner talking about the bruising on Trump's hand. Let's play it. In my hands, you know I was combing over it. I know I want to talk to you about this. So Dr. Reiner, much has been made of the president's hand bruising, which is usually covered up by makeup. And I want to just talk about the portion of this medical summary because it states that it is
Consistent with minor soft tissue irritation related to frequent hand shaking.
Right. Well, I suppose that can happen particularly if you're on a higher dose of aspirin than
“we typically recommend. What's the patient for cardiovascular protection?”
But it doesn't explain why his left hand is also bruising unless he's doing some left-handed
shaking routinely and vigorously. So that's never really wrong true. And perhaps he's
it's all just because of this higher dose of aspirin but my question is why are you taking a higher dose of aspirin than recommended? And then they talk about the CT scan. Let's play it. Are they doing serial CT scans of his heart because they have an ongoing concern? That's not listed in the note. But the importance of this of this memorandum is really summarized in the last line. And this is why it's so important for the public to see this. And when there was some concern that they would just
simply not go into release it. What I mentioned earlier today was the last line of all these notes
always say the same thing, which is that upon examination and evaluation of the patient,
“the president is deemed fit for service as commander-in-chief and head of state. And that's crucial”
the public knows that. And this report would speak to that conclusion. There are other things that misses. There's no discussion about the patient's obvious excess of sleeping is during the day. And that's an important omission. And then they talk about the lag swelling. Let's play this clip. One thing I want to ask you about. And I will note part of what they say in that last line is that his demanding daily schedule including multiple high-level meetings, public engagements,
and regular physical activity continues to support is overall well-being and talks about his cognitive and physical performance. But there were two points there. And one is that there was an AI evaluation of the president's cardiac health. And it found he is actually 14 years younger. I want you to elaborate on what that means and how you determine that. But also to your point about monitoring something, there's a section of that extremities and musculoskeletal, slight lower leg swelling
was noted with improvement from last year. Does that suggest that there had been a monitoring and does that give you pause? And tell me about this 14-year younger president. Well first of all, if you look at Dr. Barbara Bell as note from April of last year, it notes no swelling in the legs. So if he has swelling in his legs, then that's not improvement from last year. That's a deterioration from last year. Perhaps it's improved from over to summer
when the photos made the press. But last year at this time, the documented that the president had no swelling in his legs. And then how about the AI evaluation? Let's play this clip right here. But last year at this time, the documented that the president had no swelling in his legs. So how about this, the AI? AI of 14 years younger. Yeah. Yeah. So they reported that last year as well. And when I discussed this with some of my colleagues in cardiology, everyone laughed.
That's not a clinical, that's not a clinical use tool. There was one paper on this technology. So, but that's not really a way to gauge cardiac, cardiac health. That's not a clinically
“accepted or relevant tool. Well, his birthday is coming out. Why don't you for him?”
It's a fluttering for the president. You think Dr. Rhiner? But it's not, it's not a clinic we use tool. Well, thank you for your expertise. You would know Dr. Barbara Bell, there you have it. Let me know what you think folks. Hit subscribe. Let's get to 7 million subscribers. Let me know what you think.
Appreciate you as always. Thanks for watching.
Thanks for watching. Be sure to add the minus such podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast for new updates every single day.
