Melania Trump's dark past continues to surface and it is getting ugly as Dona...
Not just on Donald Trump, but also on Melania. Also,
Melania has been bragging that she won the lawsuit that was filed against her by Michael Wolf Donald Trump's former biographer, but let me explain to you what the ruling actually says from this Trump appointed judge because when you read between the lines, Melania did not win that case in my opinion. The judge simply abstained from making a ruling.
“And I think this will allow Michael Wolf to pursue his claims, potentially in state court,”
or potentially to re-bring his claims in another federal court if he wants to bring it in Florida. Uh, let me break down what's going on here. Oh, and also Amanda Angaro. Yeah, you know, the star witness who Democrats are ready to bring back from Rio de Janeiro when they control the house oversight committee. Paolo Zampolis ex-girlfriend, the mother of Zampolis child. You remember, Zampolis introduced Donald Trump to Melania at the kickcat club in 1998. He would bring young
eastern European girls and women to the kickcat club. He'd say their models and then they would meet the wealthy Manhattan men. That's one of the ways that Melania is telling the story about how she met Donald Trump. Angaro's out with some new statements as well that I think she's using coded language about Melania's dark past. Let's break it all down. So there's a lot of places where we can start here. But why don't we start with Thomas Massey on his revenge tour against
Donald Trump? I shouldn't even say his revenge tour. He's just simply out there getting revenge against all of the Epstein class in general. He's, you know, I disagree with Massey on a lot of things,
“but he's worked with Rho Khan. I think bravely and heroically to get out those Epstein files. Also,”
he's been outspoken against the catastrophic and a lawful war in Iran. So what did he say yesterday morning? He said, uh, seems like Melania knows what's going on here and he points to Melania as saying Melania knows what's up right Melania. You know what's really going on here. Listen to what Massey had to say. Let's play this clip right here. Can we expect you to name more names in the coming weeks and months? Yes. Todd Blanche is violating the law. There's still millions of
files they haven't released. We know from talking to the victim's lawyers that their own 302 forms haven't been released. We know that files have been over redacted. I have released at least three names of billionaires who are implicated in this. I don't think it's possible to get to convictions with Todd Blanche at the top and with the FBI director Cash Patel at the top because they've effectively both purged themselves by saying that there's nobody else in the files. Even Melania
doesn't believe that. The first lady knows that Jeffrey Epstein didn't act alone and here's the
great thing, Kristen. Whether I'm a Congress or not, the Epstein files transparency act is a law and it goes on for years. So if we can't get this attorney journal in this FBI director to do the right thing, the next ones who take those seats are obligated by law to release the files that these individuals are not releasing now. Okay. That was one of Donald Trump's former allies essentially turned whistleblower named drop in Melania Trump for what she knows and Melania will say,
all of my messages with Epstein, all of those photos that you're so they're not real when you saw me and Guillain Maxwell, none of that's true. I didn't do any of the photos with me in Jeffrey,
“never happened. That's all fake news she says. It she goes, don't you dare even bring it up?”
None of that is true is what she says. And by the way, this piece that I'm doing right here on
YouTube just to give you the disclaimer, this is protected by the first amendment of the United States
Constitution. I'm giving you my opinion speech, Melania can disagree with my opinion. You can agree or disagree with my opinion, but opinion speech. If you don't like opinion speech, you can stop watching this video, Megan Kelly. Of course, one of the magasic offense, she just laid into Donald Trump and named drop Melania as well. Talking about, isn't it interesting that Donald Trump's out there attacking other people's marriages all the time? Huh, she goes, she goes. I wonder what
Donald Trump's been doing with Melania? We want to talk about marriages. Let's talk about marriages. Watch what Megan Kelly has to say. Let's play it. Talk about a glass house. I mean,
She did on every wife he's had.
of his children Ivana. It was all over the New York papers. I'm from New York. I was dating
“New York, but I was in New York at that when this was all went down the city. And he was like being”
touted. Like he was proud of the affair. It was all over the papers. So, and by the way, Ivana
his first wife accused him of raping her that she alleged in her first book that he was so angry
over the hair transplant he got that she made him get. It was so painful that he raped her. And she later retracted that when he ran for president. But that stood on the books for some time. I don't know whether that's sure or not. I'm just saying clearly not a great relationship there. And then he winds up with Melania. And you know, if you think Trump's been faithful to Melania. That's great. You got bigger issues than I can solve here. But, but so the nerve, like the nerve
to act for him to be judging somebody else's marriage or love relationships or choices, it just shows you like he's got Hutspa. I guess is the word for it. Like beyond. And it was really inappropriate. No, it was wrong. What he said was wrong on many levels. And then Amanda Angaro, Amanda Angaro, has previously said that she knows where the bodies are buried essentially regarding Melania and Donald. She was with Zom Poli for many, many years. Remember, she was brought here
Angaro was by one of Epstein sex traffickers from Brazil. And she was kind of brought into this whole Epstein class crew. She then eventually met Zom Poli. And of course, Zom Poli brought in separately Melania from Eastern Europe made the connection between Donald Trump and Melania expedited her visa. Remember, Donald Trump, during the first campaign, when everybody had all of these questions, like wait a minute. Melania seems to have lied about her college degrees. She didn't seem to get
“one from Slovenia's university. I think she did a little bit of college, but didn't graduate.”
How'd you get here? How'd you get an Einstein visa? Red flags everywhere. I'm about Melania being here. Trump said it two weeks. I'm going to do a press conference about why Melania is in what her immigration status is more lies. And I remember Angaro knows from Zom Poli what's really gone on. She knows about these so-called modeling agencies and everything surrounding them.
Here's what Angaro just posted. There are things I never had to courage to say publicly,
not because I didn't feel them, but because sometimes fear quietly takes up so much space that you start believing it's normal to live like that, normal to make yourself smaller, normal to emotionally survive instead of truly live, normal to hide parts of yourself just to
“keep going. And I think it's finally time to talk about it for real. No characters, no rehearsed phrases,”
no appearance of perfection, just truth. Maybe someone else needs to hear this too. And she also reposted this. May 2015, Jeffrey Me and Redacted decided that we love you. When can we come see you. Kira Procarova, Key Epstein recruiter, dated Russian oligarch. She repost that and says, "Oh, MG." And then post this email from the Epstein files May 27, 2015 of this Kira Kira Kira Procarova, Jeffrey Me and Blank. Me who's Blank, we decided that we love you.
When can we come see you? Kira Procarova, I'm just curious. Who that refers to now? This also comes at the same time that you had an individual testify before the Sarah Kellon before the House Oversight Committee. Jeffrey Epstein's personal assistant, Sarah Kellon alleges three men besides Epstein abused her, including former Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, celebrity hairstylist Frederick
Fkai. The Miami Harold has confirmed us victims never had a chance she said in testimony before
House Oversight Committee, Fkai and Levine deny those allegations by Epstein's personal assistant. And wouldn't you know over here, I looked up Fkai just to see if there were any connections with Melania, Donald Trump, Melania and Frederick Fkai hanging out together during Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week Fall, 2003 Front Road Together. Look, if you're in this community, you're paying attention. You know what's happening and a lot of what's happening. It's directly
affecting your Medicare. Plans are being discontinued. Premiums are going up. And the broker you might have talked to, probably pushing Medicare Advantage plans even if they aren't right for you.
That's why I want you to know about chapter.
Medicare plan in the country. Thousands of people from this community have already used them.
“One viewer, Kevin and Florida, is saving $2100 a year. Another Steven finally has a plan that”
covers his dialysis. And for the mightest mighty, a call with chapter is free and takes just 20 minutes. So, if you're on the right plan, they'll tell you. And if not, they'll help you find a plan
that fits your needs. I want you to know that we've gotten such incredible feedback from the
mightest mighty about chapter. Frankly, it is overwhelming the positivity that is out there for chapter. And so I'm so glad to be affiliated with it. I'm so glad you're all having great experiences. So, call 82 Medicare today to speak with chapter. That is 82 Medicare and feel confident in your Medicare coverage. Now, I want to bring us to you may have heard about the results in Michael Wolves lawsuit against Melania. Just a quickly remind you, Melania threatened to sue
Michael Wolves for a billion dollars saying that Wolves defamed her in his reporting Wolves is one of Trump's former biographers. Michael Wolves sued Melania because she gave him a deadline. I'm going to sue you by this state unless you apologize to me. And then I'm going to sue you for a billion dollars. I want an apology in a retraction. Michael Wolves said, "Under New York state law, there's something called an anti-slap statute which allows reporters
to sue if somebody's engaging in certain threats that the person believes chills their first
amendment speech. So Wolves was never sued by Melania for defamation, even to this day.
Melania has not sued Wolves for defamation, even though she claims he defamed her."
“I think that's curious. Remember, she also said she was going to sue Hunter Biden for a billion”
dollars because he defamed her. Notice she never files those lawsuits. She just makes these threats. I think she's a freckles. I could be wrong. Again, opinion. I think she's afraid of discovery. I think she's afraid of being under oath. So Wolves sue her in state court. She removes it to a federal court and then she wants the case transferred to Florida where I believe she wanted to be in front of Judge Eileen Cannon. Unfortunately in New York federal court,
the case was randomly assigned to Judge Viscassil, who was a Trump appointee during Donald
Trump's first term. A magasic event. Judge Viscassil sat on this case for the end of February
March, April, May. And then the end of last week, this Trump appointee and Lackie, Viscassil finally made this ruling. And lots of people were like, "Oh, I guess she's dismissing the lawsuit that was filed by Michael Wolves." So what Melania did was she took the state court case. She removed it to federal court because she said, "Since I'm from Florida and you're from New York, that's a legal technical term called diversity jurisdiction. Therefore, and the case is
valued at more than $75,000. It belongs in federal court." So up to federal court, then transfer it to a sister federal court in Florida. If the both parties are from the same state New York, New York, New York, and Wolffa Ledges, Melania's from New York, it stays in state court. Wolffa wanted the case in state court. Melania wanted into federal court because she got a Trump appointee judge and then moved it over. She wanted to move to Florida. So lots of people
were like Wolves' case got dismissed. That was the headline. But I don't really think that's actually what went down. And I think the judge made a very bad ruling that could be easily subject to a appeal. But that's not what the judge did. And I actually think the judge was kind of calling out Melania and saying, "Are you going to sue this guy? I'm abstaining from this guy's lawsuit from Michael Wolves' lawsuit. But you got to sue him if you think that you are defamed Melania
or else, you know, why would you make this threat?" So here's the New York Post regime media headline. Judge Toss's Michael Wolff's lawsuit against Melania Trump calls it "contorted and not how courts work." And Melania Trump responds, "First Lady Melania Trump," I mean, she speaks and
“that's how she refers to herself. First Lady Melania Trump is proud to continue standing up to”
and fighting against those who spread malicious and defamatory falsehoods as they desperately try to get undeserved attention and money from their unlawful conduct. Well, Melania, if you feel that way, then why would you go through all of this procedural stuff versus just sue Michael Wolff? If you believe you've been defamed, sue him and sue him for defamation and have your deposition taken. But that's not what's occurred here. When you go through what Judge Viscassil, this Trump
appointed Lackey, though, actually ruled, she says, "I'm not ruling on the merits at all."
Specifically, she says, "For the reasons discussed below, the court neither d...
on the merits nor dismisses for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Instead, it abstains
“under Wilson," that's a case called Wilson, where the court simply is saying, "I'm being asked”
to make a declaratory relief judgment." And I can because you're asking the court to exercise
discretion and declare that Melania has violated your first amendment rights, I'm simply going to
abstain, go good luck finding another judge, but I'm out of this, basically. I don't view this as a win from Melania personally, in my opinion. Here's how the judge described it. In this case, a chronicle or a first family, sue the first lady because she threatened to sue him for defamation, while plaintiff and the first lady have a real dispute, they must litigate it according to the same procedures as everybody else. In other words, the judge is suing. While the judge is saying,
“Melania, why don't you sue Wolf? Then it goes on to say, "Because," let me read over here,”
it goes on to say, "The court here does not pass upon the substantive validity of plaintiff is Wolf," a plaintiff's claims. Indeed, as discussed further below, those claims are really defenses and counterclaims, which should be resolved in a posture that presents them accordingly. That is the sole basis of the court's decision here, recognizing the existence of a case of controversy between the parties, the court merely and specifically declined to adjudicate
the merits. In other words, what the judge is saying, "I am using my discretion, simply not to hear your case, Wolf, as an affirmative case. Melania sue you, then you can sue for counterclaims, and then you can raise these issues. But until she sue you, then you can sue her." I won't hear that, does basically what the judge said. That's not what Melania, Melania, actually acts like she won the case, and I'm reading for you. That's not exactly what happened
plaintiff, while correct that the game'smanship identified by the first lady is not based on is not based in the merits, is wrong to conceive of it as a trap door back to state court,
then it goes on to say, "It is well settled that where the federal court never could have
exercised original jurisdiction over the case. Remand is required, and I'll just let you hear it in Wolf's own words as well. Let's play this claim." So she basically had two choices to remand the case to state court or rule on the case. Functionally, she did neither, so effectively kicking the case out of federal court. So now weirdly, the case no longer exists in federal court. Where does it exist? So what she may have done, and this is going to be complicated to kind
of untie this, untie this, not that she's created, but she may have actually done rule effectively, ruled against the Trumps without saying so, because effectively, kicking the case out of federal court by default puts it back into state court, which is what
we wanted in the first place. So I mean, we never had any illusions that this was going to proceed
in a straight line, this case, but and we now have to figure out exactly exactly in which way are we going to proceed, go back to state court, appeal in federal court, but make no mistake. We are going forward with this, and you know, I guess in some sense, you know, and we're back to where we are in this political moment, we will get in front of a non-Trump judge and then get a
“much different kind of ruling. So that's what Michael Wolfe said, you know, in my view is again,”
the judge just simply abstained and said, "Malania, why aren't you suing him?" And Wolfe saying, "I'm not done yet." So that's the status right here. Oh, I shouldn't mention this too. Just just as a passing aside with all of these Epstein connections, Don Jr. Mary's Bettina Anderson, Donald Trump doesn't show up. Bettina Anderson, according to the Daily Mail, was trying to marry Elon Musk before Don Jr. We saw Elon Musk in the Epstein files.
Bettina's dad who passed away a while ago was the guy who helped Epstein get the necessary approvals
Loans for Epstein Island by giving Epstein a letter of recommendation.
banker in Florida who had helped Jeffrey Epstein in that way. So you just see all of the connections.
“Here together, Malania, your dark past is coming up. Everybody hit subscribe.”
Let's get to 7 million subscribers. Thanks for watching. Thanks for watching. Be sure to add
the slightest touch podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast for new updates every single day.
