Top military leaders in the United States and abroad are issuing warnings tha...
is incapable of carrying out his duties as a commander-in-chief, that Donald Trump
“pose an imminent threat to the United States and to countries across the world.”
Top military leaders, admirals, generals, foreign military leaders are leaking to the press just how bad it has gotten and how they have to keep Donald Trump out of the situation room because his erratic behavior and temperament is just getting so bad that it will get many, many more people killed by him just even being in the room. There's Wall Street journal articles like "Behind Trump's public bravado on the war." He grapples with his own fears, talks about how
he's running around the White House, screaming yelling, cursing, panicking, behaving like a lunatic, talking about how he's afraid he's going to lose and then the next minute. He's acting all tough just really odd behavior. You've got reporting out about how low the more rallies of members of our Navy. You've got leaks coming out about how Iran still maintains most of its ballistic missile and Shahi drone and FPV drone capabilities. You've got leaks coming out about the conditions aboard
the USS Gerald Ford, which is close to 300 days at sea surpassing the record for the longest deployed aircraft carrier since the end of the Cold War. You have leaks coming out about how the U.S. Navy is now preparing to potentially board Iranian-linked sanction crude oil tankers and seas commercial ships with an international waters. As we saw they reportedly did on Sunday, but the military generals, admirals and other leaders were warning about this leaking information
to the press about how that would lead to escalation and likely cause the war to really heat up yet again. You have leaks coming out about safety concerns and stress and the lack of planning and just what an absolute disaster things are within the military right now. We know of course that Donald Trump has fired the top military leaders, top generals, fired the top general in the United States Army, General Randy George, the Chief of Staff of the Army, and with our top military
leaders were forced to testify before the House of Representatives at the end of last week.
And they were asked questions about these terminations. They were basically like, "Look, we can't,
we don't have any answers. You'll have to ask Pete Exhib. We're not sure why he did that. By the way, the fact that you had the Army Chief of Staff Randy George fired, that added to the fact that there were several other top officers dozens over the past 12 to 18 months, more 16 months or so, but you had the chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Seek you Brown Jr., he recently spoke out against the Trump regime at Harvard. I showed you that interview that he gave at Harvard.
You had Admiral Risa Frenchetti, the Chief of Naval Operations, who was the first woman in the world. You had General James Slyff, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force. You had the top
Jag lawyers who were fired. You know, it's basically been a gutting of our top military leaders.
“And you all remember to when the Joint Staff, Social Media Account, made a post,”
basically extending their deepest gratitude to General Randy George, the Chief of Staff of the Army and one of the reasons that he was purportedly fired is that he was promoting people based on merit, and it was alleged that Hexith didn't want certain people who Hexith said, "Oh, there must be because of diversity or DEI," or in my opinion, just very racist things. I'm just sharing with you, my opinion, is why Hexith didn't want certain people promoted.
And General Randy George was fired as a result. And Randy George and his wife, Patty, they were institutions within the institution of the United States military. And so
their terminations, his termination, and basically how George and Patty were treated has just
“pissed off the military to know. And also, I think the military sees how weak Donald Trump is behaving,”
you know, in Iran. I think the military is like, "Make up your mind, man, like, you know, we don't think that we should do ground invasions into Carg Island. We were warning you not to invade Iran in the first place. You didn't take our advice. Remember, there were all of
Those warnings going back to February.
chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Dan Cain, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Rays and Cain,
as they call them within the defense department. He warned everybody with the defense. Don't do this. This is going to be a disaster. The article was Pentagon flags, risks of major operation against Iran. The warnings have been led by General Dan, Rays and Cain, chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff within the Defense Department, during meetings of the National Security Council. But, you know, they're like, "Okay, you didn't take our advice. You did this invasion." So what
are you going to do now? You're just going to keep on making social media posts. I mean,
“that's how you're going to do this war. You're going to put in all caps. We're going to destroy”
the civilization. That's war crimes, by the way. And don't get us involved in your war crimes. But what are you going to do? If you're going to go to war, go to war. I mean, that's what the military does. You want us to do it. There's going to be high casualties. Lots of soldiers are going to die. Is that what you want? Okay. You don't want that. So what are you going to use? They're going to be going to be mean. You think you're going to scare around with mean words. And so the military
generals and admirals are just like leaking to the press. This guy's got no plan and he needs to be kept as far away as possible from decision-making. Just think about how what a wild thing that is that I mean, it's the right outcome. But that that's happening. And then that all the stuff is being leaked to the press. As we wrote on the Midest Touch Network account, a stunning
“new report in the Wall Street Journal reveals that military advisors intentionally excluded Donald”
Trump from the command room during the recent high stakes operation to extract a downed U.S. airmen in Iran because they feared his erratic behavior could jeopardize the mission. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump was in such a volatile state after Iran shut down a U.S. jet that he spent hours screaming at AIDS in the West Wing obsessing over the political fall and invoking Jimmy Carter in the 1979 hostage crisis. Officials made the call to limit his
access. Only briefing him at meaningful moments instead of giving him real-time control. Meanwhile, the operation itself nearly fell apart with aircraft struck in desert sand and U.S. forces scrambling to avoid a rotting detection. The airmen was eventually rescued, but the chaos then and there, just hours later, Trump woke up and fired off his profanely-laced threat online, warning a rano would be left living in hell and he would destroy their civilization. I just want to be clear as well.
“That's how Wall Street Journal reports the mission itself with these two F-15E pilots.”
I've reported that I have a lot of questions about what really went down because why don't we
know who these F-15E pilots are? They've never given their names. They've never spoken to the press.
We've never seen photos of them. Also, where they were rescued was very close to the Iranian nuclear facilities. It seemed to me that it was possible that there was a broader mission being used. Whether the F-15E pilots were shot down or not, whether that was part of a CIA operation, or whether the fact that they were shot down allowed a pretext for a special operations mission to take place in order to try to extract the uranium which failed. I raised a lot of issues that
I still have lots of questions there and I think we should all have questions there. You know, also in this dam in Wall Street Journal piece, it talks about all of Trump's anxiety, how he has all of these threats and how he improvises things. He uses insults as a tactic to bring Iranians and the negotiating table screaming at AIDS, which it's not working at all. He wants to change subjects and talk about the ballroom and threatens war crimes and it's
miscalculation after miscalculation and these generals, again, they're going to the press and it's leaking like a fire hose right now at this point. Also recent leaks, NPR reporting that cracks are forming inside the military, driven by low morale, ethical unease and a growing number of service members, choosing to retire early, declining to re-enlist or walking away from their contracts, regardless of the consequences. The GI rights hotline has seen call
volume more than double since the Iran war began. The majority of callers are asking about conscientious objections, being forced to commit war crimes and they don't want to do it. Then there was the leaks of the food that our service members were being given aboard the
USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Tripoli. You can see right here. They're basically being given
poor low quality food. I mean, just look at what you're even seeing right here. It doesn't even look edible. It's like three little pieces of things, I guess. And then the leak came out that
Families were not able to even send their loved ones, their service members a...
While our service members had very low morale and weren't able to eat the food, that they needed.
You know, it's easier than fixing a problem, not having the problem in the first place. Your
“liver is one of those organs that you don't think about until you have to. Supporting a daily is”
one of the small things that can make a huge difference in how you feel overall, and that's where dose comes in. Dose for your liver is a clinically backed liver health supplement. This isn't just another capsule or powder. Dose is a liquid supplement. It's taken in a daily two-ounce shot and it tastes like fresh squeezed orange juice. Here's white matters. Your liver is your body's filter. It processes everything you consume and handles over 500 plus daily functions. Energy production, digestion,
fat metabolism, vitamin storage. When your liver is overworked, you feel it. Dose helps cleanse the liver of unwanted stressors that may be slowing your liver down and promotes daily liver function so that your liver can do its job. Zero sugar, zero junk, zero calories. And when you take dose daily, you're going to reduce sluggishness, get rid of those midday crashes, support your metabolism, and even aid your daily digestion. Plus, this is the real deal. There are two double-blind
placebo-controlled studies showing doses positive impact on liver enzyme levels. Are you ready to give
your liver the support it deserves? Head to dosedally.co/mitis or enteritis to get 35% off your first
subscription. Your body does so much for you. Let's do something for it. That's d-o-s-e-d-a-i-i-i-i-d-s for 35% off your first month subscription. Let me bring you into capital Hill right now where we had our top military, current officers, being asked question by members of Congress like, "Why was general George fired?" And watch as they basically say, "We don't know." I mean, it's a headset thing. Here, play this clip. I've read all of the news reports about why was dismissed, but I would like
to hear from you. Why was general George dismissed? Sure, that's a question for secretary headset. Okay, right. I've been the vice for a couple months now. Okay. We honored the service
of general George and his wife. Well, I don't know if they were dismissed. Well, thank you for that. I would
“like for Secretary Hakes that to answer the reason of why they were dismissed. And I think that the”
way general George and his wife, Patty, were treated will have a chilling effect on our services operate in the future. Prior to this, on Secretary of Defense, removed four army officers from the O7 list before their nomination left the DOD. Is that correct? Sure. I think that list is still moving forward. I mean, our process, the process has been followed through the army provided to list of the Secretary's worst office and it has gone forward. Whether those officers
have been split from the list, you know, higher, I'm not sure at this time. They're civilian oversight of the processors, you know. There's multiple checks as it goes and that, you know, as it goes from the White House to the Senate, there's opportunities for multiple reasons for that. Let me refer to it because I'm a little time clock here, but my understanding is that somewhere around 3% of kernels are selected to move forward to become general officers. Is that number, at least
approximately accurate? That's sure, approximately accurate. So, of all of the kernels out there, they're selected by their peers and by their board, it's narrowed down about 3% of the kernels that actually move forward, becoming general officers. And the, the opening, the reporting is that Secretary Hakeseth pulled and the individually pulled four names from that list. I'm less worried about the race and the gender than if he did or he didn't do it. Did he pull four names from the
list? Is it has been reported? Sure, you'd have to ask Secretary Hakeseth that. Okay, I've been well, if I could get anybody over there to respond, I would, I would ask him and I appreciate that, but I, I would, I will say this, but I would like to know why those four, if those four names were removed from the list, I would like to know why they were removed from the list. There may be
“a legitimate reason. Let me get to why this important. The military expects us officers to”
provide truthful and honest advice versus being yes men to their leadership chain. Is that correct, gentlemen? What all of you generals agree with me with that statement? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. If our top general officers are removed without justification from their positions
For providing honest objective advice, which is something that I always knew ...
to give, then I fear that it's going to have a trickle-down effect that's going to be devastating
to the other officers and especially how their spouse is feel about continuing to spend their
“lives in service. This is a team sport. The officer and the spouse are in this together and I think”
that the general George and and his wife Patty, I think they were very unfairly treated and I would appreciate if the secretary defense would be forthcoming with whether or not four names were removed from the list. I'm less concerned about race and gender than I am why they were removed from the list and if he has individually changed the way we're going to handle the promotion and the selection promotion of our general officers in the military. And what about our strategic readiness here?
Let's play this clip right here. General the need. The army is deploying high demand systems like air defense systems across multiple theaters. Are these the same systems we would rely on in a large-scale conflict? All right, yes ma'am. All right. And what risk does that create for
our ability to respond to a second contingency? I mean, you know, my role as the vice is the
man trained equipped and certified and the build the force to co-com commanders were utilized. We're supporting Admiral Cooper in team. If we have to search to another location, then we'll have to look at how we balanced that to be able to provide the resources necessary. I appreciate the question. Now, former commander of the U.S. Army, Europe general Ben Hodges is also calling out the fact that we have like Jared Custer and Steve Wittkov doing these negotiations who don't know
“what the hell they're doing like, why do we have them doing anything right now here play this clip?”
When the diplomats you have working negotiations are not professional diplomats. I mean, it was a son-in-law and his real estate friend, that's, you know, this is where mistakes happen. And then also, if you surround yourself with the psychophantic cabinet officials, particularly like Mr. Hexel,
the Secretary of Defense, and never going to push back on the president.
And then as I mentioned, you have internationally, you have, you know, generals in other countries, like Canada's general, when they're top military leaders, calling out the United States here. Let's play this clip for you. I, like, we need to understand that, like, post-cold war,
“we were asked to do different types of missions. So militaries equip and structure themselves to”
respond to specific types of missions. So we were most of the time asked to do missions in, like, in an expeditionary fashion, in a, you know, very specific theater of operation, within limited objectives. So then you organize structure, equip yourself to deliver this type of mission. But the world has changed, as you mentioned, and we, you know, we live it on a daily basis. We're now looking at the Ukraine's lessons learned, Russian behavior and, you know,
other, other of their, you know, collaborators. So we, we have to get ready for large-scale conflicts, more conventional. So we need a different, a different military to do that, and different capabilities. And then you have the former NATO Secretary General Stoltonberg. He's also previously leader in Norway. Here is what he has to say here, play this clip. Investing significantly more in the events, some European allies like Poland, the Baltic countries, in my own country Norway,
where actually now spending a larger share of economy or GDP on the fence than United States. So this has changed. And it's not, not only about resources, but also about geography. My country, what Norway is in border Russia, just on the other side of our land border, you see the highest concentration of nuclear weapons in the world, missiles, submarines, bombers. And these weapons are not directed that Norway, they are directed at the United States.
But Norway helps the US to monitor, to track the submarines, to share intelligence,
To give you early warning and to tell exactly what the Russians are doing.
This is part of the US homeland defense provided by NATO ally Norway. And there are many other
similar examples. So the US is safer with the strong NATO. And therefore, I expect that
“I believe that the US will continue to be committed to NATO.”
So there you have it folks. Let me know what you think about all of this. But
you know, I think the military is recognizing that the Commander-in-Chief is no Commander-in-Chief.
“I mean, obviously, obviously, I mean, it's like, is the sky blue? Although Donald Trump would tell you”
the sky is orange. It's orange, it's orange, it's orange. It's subscribed. Let's get to 7 million
thanks so much for watching everybody. Love this video. Support independent media and unlock exclusive
“content, add free videos and custom emojis by becoming a paid member of our YouTube channel today.”
You can also give memberships the others. Let's keep growing together.
