"Very good, very good, very good.
"Very good?"
"Like this, steuer is very good."
"That's a whole lot." "Cool, what do you say?"
“"The one on the wall and test computer, focus money, chip, finance, and so on."”
"Mega, but that's still being completed." "Yeah, just a few photos of the loan steuer will have to do it." "Very good, very good." "It's very good, hold your money, with this steuer." "Caffeine is your best form."
"With Cuba, we'll take care of coffee at least a minute." "Then with the new Cuba One capsule machine from Chibu, "genies to finance specific coffee from special needs." "Full Monday's aromas, thanks to innovative press-brut technologie "and over 17 hours coffee for every snack."
"A labor premium coffee from up to 20 euros." "And decades now, the Cuba capsule machine "in their Chibu fiale and of Chibu D.E." "A top Trump cabinet official just made numerous "incriminating admissions during testimony
"before the United States Senate and a number of the
"incriminating admissions relate to the upcoming World Cup, "which seems like it's going to be an absolute disaster "under the Trump regime. "So department of homeland security, secretary, "marquane mole in just testified before the United States Senate.
"And there has been a lot of concern "overmarquane mole threatening to shut down all international travel "to blue states and blue cities if they don't comply "with Donald Trump's plans to send ice and border patrol "to round up more migrants and torture them
"and send them into detention centers. "Marquane mole and said that he was going to "remove all customs and border patrol agents "from the international airports "in these blue states and blue cities,
"which would effectively shut these airports down "and that would shut down all international travel. "So obviously there was a lot of questions "that senators want to do ask, "marquane mole in about that "and about other topics like, "Would you comply with
"court orders blocking you from doing that
“"or blocking you from engaging in other unlawful behavior?”
Look, there are a lot of people from other countries "who are not going to be coming to the United States "overfears about ice harassing, torturing, "dating people who travel to the United States. "There's a lot of boycotts taking place here
"and abroad of the U.S. hosting the World Cup. "In addition, there wasn't update in the past 24 or 48 hours "where we saw that Norway officially is protesting "and sending an official complaint about FIFA "giving Donald Trump a peace prize
"through Gianni Infantino, which shows bias "which FIFA isn't supposed to do." So let me just show you what went down though at this United States Senate hearing where Mark Wayne Mullen testified.
He was asked some pretty basic questions. "You had Democratic Senator Murphy saying, "Look, if you're blocked from doing certain things "by federal judges, if you are given these court orders, "would you comply with court orders?"
And you'll see Mark Wayne Mullen says, "No, he's not going to comply with any court orders. "If he views the court orders as being too political "for him and the Trump regime, you're playing this clip." - Yeah, you will, you'll not implement court orders.
- If we did not think that if we didn't think courts were politicized, then I would probably lay enter that, but we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law.
- So yeah. - And we can see that because we see how many times they'll show you, not in certain orders. You obey, based upon whether you know what I said to be, don't, don't, don't but words in my mouth. - That's what you saying, man.
- What I'm saying is we won't force the law
we're never going to break the Constitution.
- You just said that you will not follow every court order because you know, the Christians are getting it or don't, they'll start putting words on that. That's not what I said. I said, I will never break the Constitution.
- We're going to force the law. - We'll, will you implement court orders when they tell you to stop? And I hear, you're making a assumption on court orders. - I have a rule. - You will, will you not.
- I, I'm going to enforce law and I'll never break the Constitution. - I think, listen, if you're a Republican or a Democrat
“on this committee, you should be really, really freaked out.”
- We should be really concerned about the rulings that come out of the courts and often they get over her. - It falls apart. - If you were telling me that you follow court when you have a judge, just make this political opinion
from a judge, they're outside the law too. Not all judges are above the law, but sometimes they think they are, that's why we see lower courts get overturned by higher courts constantly. - To which Senator Murphy pointed out.
So I guess, any time somebody disagrees with you or any time you disagree with someone, you just say, ah, they're politicizing things. That's your whole entire rapier here play this clip. - Access.
- It's not true. And I would suggest that you spend more time in their own prison. - Endless, any time somebody disagrees with you, whether it's a member of this committee,
whether it's a state public health agency,
Whether it's a federal court, they are politicizing
the department of, sir, that's exactly what you're doing.
- Oh, my gosh, security, I've just been sort of shielded by our interact. - Then we got to hear from Senator Van Hollen, who cross-examined Mark Wayne Mullen here and said, look, there's just so many false statements
coming out of the department of Homeland Security about Alex Pretty, about Renee Good, about Julio Cesar Sosa, Seles, about so many things, you guys have a pattern of lying, and wouldn't you say, take a watch of this cross-examination
right here, let's play it. - Secretary, you'd agree that it's important for the American public to be able to trust what DHS says, right? And that it's important that the department
put out factual information. You agree that that's important.
“- I think it's important for elected officials.”
- I think it's very important for everybody. So I'm holding up a press release here,
the Secretary dated January of this year,
it's before your time. It says that a person named Julio Sosa Seles, violently assaulted a DHS agent. I want to read the quote in here from former Secretary, no, she said quote, what we saw last night,
Minneapolis was an attempted murder of federal law enforcement. Our officer was ambushed and attacked by three individuals who beat him with snow shovels and the handles of rooms, fearing for his life, the officer fired a defensive shot,
unquote, that's a untrue statement, isn't it, the Secretary? - What we have been briefed on, yes, yeah. - And it came to light because the city of Minneapolis had a camera system and state authorities from Hennepin County have pursued the investigation
and recently arrested this officer. Are you aware of that? - I believe so, yes, yeah. - So this is part of a pattern we've seen because I do want to turn to the case of Alex Predi.
And in that case, Secretary Norm said that he was engaged in an act of domestic terrorism.
“She said that it looked like Alex Predi intended to quote”
inflict maximum damage and to kill law enforcement, unquote. That wasn't true either, wasn't. - I'm sorry, I didn't hear that. - That wasn't a true statement.
- Of her statement? - Yeah. - I don't, I can't speak on her behalf, but it's not what virus you've seen. You agree the facts don't support that statement. - Well, I didn't make the statement.
- I didn't say you did. I asked you whether you understand that the facts don't send or the investigation would say that it's probably not accurate, yeah, okay. - So again, we know that because of the video,
Secretary Norm also asserted that Renee Good was engaged in an act of domestic terrorism. So look, the reason I'm asking you this, Mr. Secretary, is I want to know if you're gonna be willing to provide state investigators access
to evidence they have requested in their ongoing investigations into the killings of Alex, Freddie, and Renee Good. - So as you know, the FBI is set up to do an investigation
“on federal law officers, and we investigate it”
from the federal side, is a federal action, not a state action. - But you're aware of the fact that the state has authority and jurisdiction as well, right? - Under actually--
- Yes, law. - Actually under the authority, the federal prosecution and hands stays within the federal government. And so the FBI is set up to do those investigations. And I do want to say something to you.
We arrest between-- - Mr. Secretary, I mean, I have limited time. - But if you said, you accuse there to be a patterned. If the chair is going to permit additional questions. - I'm there to ask you.
- Which is a patterned. - You made an accusation that it is a patterned. - And I met her, and Mr. Secretary went on. - There was a patterned. - The Secretary, Secretary, Secretary Dom said the same thing.
- But you said all state matters regarding not a patterned. - That's a patterned question. - She said there has really good to other people day. - There is not a patterned question.
- Please, the reality, the reiteration of words. - Words matter. - They do. - And I will tell you. - You have all--
- You have all the words matter. - So if they are the patterned, there's not a patterned. - Oh, I would say three in a row is a patterned. - No, sir. - That's not a patterned.
- We arrest-- - That's not the dictionary word where you're a semantics aside.
- The reality is this is a big--
- There is no semantics behind this. - A pattern of three people, we know. - Oh, 1900 a day is not a patterned. - You've just acknowledged your predecessor made statements that were not factually accurate.
I want to go, so it sounds like you're not willing to share evidence with the state authorities who were trying to get to the bottom of this. And I will just say, Mr. Secretary, that given the statements they came out of this administration,
including the White House, it is hard to trust this administration to do independent investigation. That's why it's important. - But you trust. - You're a lesson administration?
- I didn't-- I'm talking about giving it to the authorities. - I'm just saying, let's go on Apple, what am I-- - Let me ask you.
- I want to ask you, don't sit there in terror.
- I'm picking one of those things.
“- I want you to believe in another administration.”
- Not just Secretary, just, just, please calm down. - If you've been thinking about upgrading your home, let me tell you about article. One of the things I really like about articles that they make it incredibly easy to find for nature
that looks great without spending weeks trying to match different pieces together. So whether your style is modern and coastal or Scandinavian, inspired, everything feels thoughtfully designed and works together seamlessly.
For example, I got this mid-century modern coffee table. I am obsessed with it and fits perfectly in my place. In the whole process, ordering it, asking questions to customer service, getting it, setting it up. All of it was an absolute breeze.
What stands out immediately to me is the quality from the packaging to the craftsmanship. You could tell that these pieces are built to last. The materials feel substantial, the finishes look premium. And many items arrive at mostly assembled,
which is always a huge plus for me.
“It's that rare combination of great design,”
durability and value. The shopping experience is so easy to article offers fast, affordable shipping across the US and Canada. And if you need help pulling a room together, their customer care team is available seven days a week
and even offers a free interior design services. That was super helpful to me. Plus, with a 30 day satisfaction guarantee, you can shop with confidence knowing you could return it if it's not the perfect fit.
Articles offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more to claim visit article.com/mitis. And the discount will be automatically applied at checkout. That's article.com/mitis. M-e-i-d-a-s for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more.
Check it out. More cross-examination here from Senator Van Hollen, this time on a Brago Garcia, and saying, so now that a Brago Garcia has had the criminal charges dismissed against him, would you be willing to allow him
to just leave the country, go to Costa Rica, and be able to live his life without the Trump regime torturing and harassing him? You know, the whole world is watching the behavior of ice right now, especially right before the world comes.
“So, how are you going to behave here, play this clip?”
- Just, just, please come down. I'm going to ask you about Kilmar Brago Garcia. Are you aware of the fact that in that case, he has agreed to be removed to Costa Rica and that Costa Rica has agreed to accept them?
- No, I'm not, okay. So, I'd like you to look into this because, essentially, what the administration did was say to him when he was returned to the United States after being wrongfully deported to El Salvador
and the administration had been at it wrongfully deported him. After he was turned, they leveled new criminal charges against him, and they said to him, if you plead guilty to these criminal charges, we'll send you to Costa Rica, and if you don't,
we'll send you to Liberia. Well, he said, I'm not going to plead guilty to these charges and it turns out that just a short time ago, a federal judge determined that the administration had engaged in the vindictive prosecution against him.
And so my question now is, will you, the administration, agree to have a remove to Costa Rica rather than engaging and punishing him or pursuing his constitutional rights? That's the question.
If you don't have full information here, Mr. Secretary, I understand why this question is, is the gentleman here in this country, legally? - Richard, the time is expired.
- First, he would legally remove to El Salvador
and this administration has he-- - It is still in this country, illegally. - This is what, this is the point is, he has said, he will be removed to Costa Rica and Costa Rica as accepted that.
The point, the Secretary, is-- - Great, if he's willing to do this, the administration's ending. - The point is that they're engaged in what a judge already found to be in this and vindictive prosecution. And now they're trying to leverage all this
to try to get him to go to Liberia instead of Costa Rica. - Right, Rose, if you're surprised, that's the thing. - Anybody looking at this can see that. - The Senator's time is expired. - I'm good.
- Thank you. - And then, of course, people here end abroad have a great deal of concern about the training that ICE officers receive. And clearly, they are not being trained appropriately.
And even if they are being somewhat trained, which they aren't, what their behavior is on the streets is absolutely abhorrent and they've engaged in these regular crimes against humanity. So you had Senator Murray cross-examining Mark Wayne
Mullen over here. And she said, look, I was in the room where we were talking about adding reforms to ICE and Border Patrol agents.
They don't go and start attacking everybody,
and they don't behave this way.
“And then Mark Wayne Mullen's like, well,”
I was instrumental in these negotiations. And Senator Murray's like, no, you weren't. When you used to be a Senator, you weren't even at the meeting. Like, a pathological liar.
Like, I was at the meeting. You weren't there. Here, play this clip. - We're recently talking about legislation to require judicial warrants, restore training standards,
and project sensitive locations from rights. But while you and Tom Homesay, you've made some of those changes. The American people haven't seen the proof of that. So I want to ask you today, what are your current training requirements for agents?
Training requirements. - Thank you for the question. I want to remind the Senator that I was part of the notification negotiating those reforms. And I think you're aware of that.
So I actually know what happened. - Do you know you were in those room? - But I do know you were aware of them. You know, I was very involved in it. You know, the back important.
No, I was very involved. - I was in the room. You were not in the room. - I know you were very involved in it because we're talking about the house.
- Doesn't matter, I asked you a question. - You know, a Senator, you know that we agreed to all this stuff that you said. The fact is that you guys walked away because you had primary elections.
- No. - We had agreed to that. - That's what we did.
- We agreed at 90, would never get to yes.
And so we walked away and did reconciliation because you were never going to get to yes between Chuck Schumer and a King Jefferies. And you know, that's the effect. And you can't pull the rule.
- Right. - Because that was part of the rule. - If you're such, I'm telling you, I was in the room. - And we turned off.
- And we turned off. - I want to ask you. - It was interesting. I was involved in that too. - What are your plans?
“- If you want to start talking about training,”
we're going to July. - And then Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin gave an interview to CBS. Where he said, yeah, of course we're going to, of course, ICE is going to be at the World Cup Games.
Of course, we're going to be there. Here, let's play this clip. We received a confirmation that ICE will be at the World Cup and immigration arrests are not off the table. Now, Major, he did say that ICE agents won't be there
for mass round-ups, but they're also not taking their immigration enforcement hats off, take listen. - We're not there to, that we're going to be enforcing mass immigration, but we're there to enforce the law. - Mr. Secretary, what I hear you saying is--
- If you find a criminal, you will arrest them. - But the mission at the World Cup is not immigration enforcement. - We're not there.
Well, ICE always said the immigration enforcement.
We're always going to do that. But we're not there for solely that purpose. We're in there to do our job. Immigration custom enforcement. - But immigration enforcement at the World Cup
is not off the table because that is the mission of ICE. - As I said, we're not there to go round-up, mass individuals, but we are always looking for the worst of the worst. We're going to continue to do that.
But the ICE is footprint is much bigger than that. As I said, it's immigration custom enforcement. - More from Senator Murphy right here to Mark Wayne Mullin, let's take a watch. Let's play it.
“- Secretary, I think you were crazy to have taken on this job.”
But at your confirmation hearing, you did promise that you would get DHS out of the headlines. We took you at your word. But nothing has really gotten better. In fact, you've spent the first two months of your tenure
threatening to suspend international arrivals in states represented by Democrats. Not only would that throw our entire air travel system into chaos, it's completely illegal, which underscores the main issue of this hearing.
The reason why Democrats and Republicans were not able to find agreement on the underlying DHS appropriation spill
is because never before in the history of our nation,
as a federal agency been run so far off the rails as the Department of Homeland Security. Every day, this agency is breaking the law at scale and wasting billions of taxpayer dollars. - Then I'll just share with you this new poll
that has the shocking on all that shocking. Results about Americans opinion on ICE at the World Cup, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin said last month that ICE would be patrolling US stadiums where matches are taking place.
As the 2026 feeful World Cup draws nearer, an immigration ICE officers are gonna be there. Washington Post University and Maryland poll released on Tuesday yesterday, found that 65% of Americans oppose ICE officers
patrolling US stadiums during the tournament. This includes a whopping 92% of Democrats and 72% of independent voters right there. So there you have it. Let me know what you think about that testimony.
Hit subscribe, let's get to seven million subscribers and thanks for watching everybody.
- Thanks for watching.
Be sure to add the minus touch podcast
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
or wherever you get your podcast
for new updates every single day. (upbeat music)
