Were there the most important reasons from the Earth?
And were the reasons for me to return yet?
Of course, in Europe, Sarium's home.
“With the greatest reasons for the development of the world.”
Many thousands of times they were waiting for them with a fight against a flight and a real doubt. The Vivo Sarium DEA. We are not going to be distracted, Donald. We know this is all about your cover-up of a child sex trafficking ring with the Epstein files.
We know this is all about your cover-up of references to you in the Epstein files. So of course, we're going to call you out when you attack Canada. We're going to call you out when you engage in deranged behavior.
“But we are also always going to remind our audience and community here at the Minus Touch Network.”
What they already know that this is all about your cover-up of the Epstein files. That's one of the main reasons you drag the United States and the world into this catastrophic war in Iran. And mightest touch hosts like Katy Fang are leading the way. Katy Fang's lawsuit against Todd Blanch and the Department of Justice.
And the Trump regime continues to make sure that transparency for the survivors is always at the forefront of what we do at the Mightest Touch Network.
And what Katy Fang's reporting and what her independent journalism is all about. Now, Donald Trump's distraction machine was on steroids this week, even for him. Why was that?
“I want you to think about some of the developments that happened this week in Katy Fang's lawsuit against Donald Trump.”
And the Guillain Maxwell request you have her conviction overturned in federal court and Amanda Angaro. One of Melania's former closest friends who surfaced yet again, gave an interview with a well-known reporter in Portuguese, where she called out Paulo Zompoli, the individual who introduced Melania to Donald Trump at the Kit Kat Club in the late 90s. Zompoli would bring in young Eastern European girls and women to become models in the United States. He would then help them get visas.
He would help them come over with passports. And he would help them become models where they would then meet these rich wealthy Manhattan men. And the rest is history and then they would get these Einstein visas. We'll talk about that in a moment and we'll talk about what Amanda Angaro said because she had some bombshell allegations that she was making as well. So, what happened this week? Well, Guillain Maxwell lost her effort to overturn her conviction in federal court in New York before Judge Ango Meyer,
who called her appeal frivolous. And in fact, the federal judge said that her appeal and her paperwork was so frivolous that she should not even be permitted to file an appeal to the second circuit. The court said that the court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. And so she should be prohibited from challenging her conviction for which she was convicted of sex trafficking and other heinous acts against children and against others. She was sentenced to over 20 years.
The Trump regime then moved her from the facility that she was at in Tallahassee to a club fed at Camp Ryan in Texas after she said positive things about Donald Trump to Trump's criminal defense lawyer turned attorney general. But this federal judge said she should not even be permitted to take any further appeals.
So frivolous, here's what her family said though, and this is what has Donald Trump a little bit shaken right now.
Our sister is not going to let the matter rest. Guillain Maxwell's family said the district courts ruling contains multiple concrete errors that she intends to challenge fully. The family said that they have encouraged Maxwell to seek the quote, "necessary relief." Our sister is not going to let the matter rest. Sounds like that's a message for Donald, eh?
Also, the Maxwell family said that they despised that the federal judge used a very sarcastic tone. They called the judges decision shocking and they blasted the federal judge for showing disdain to Guillain Maxwell. She was convicted of sex trafficking in sentenced to 20 years.
The most, one of the most heinous crimes there are.
And what she was trying to argue was that the Epstein files vindicated her.
“She said that the Epstein files showed that she was innocent or that it provided exculpatory information that she wasn't permitted to show during her criminal trial six years ago.”
So, to which the federal judge was like, "Ginoid, I read those files. They're very bad for you. They make it worse for you, not better." If anything, the release of these documents means you could have been charged with more. I don't read these files and go, "You know what? That's an innocent person." And what's fascinating as well is you know all of the references to Donald Trump in those files. And of course, the references that Donald Trump is trying to cover up.
But indeed, you have Guillain Maxwell's family saying, "She will not let this matter rest. We know that she knows." And Trump knows that she knows all about Donald Trump's disgusting and dark past.
And she's not going to let it go until she gets a pardon or a commutation.
So, I want you all to pay attention there. But that's not the only development this week.
“The other major development in Katie Fang's lawsuit against Todd Blanche.”
Donald Trump's former criminal defense lawyer now the attorney general of the United States, which is pretty sickening. In her lawsuit against Blanche and the DOJ, the federal judge ordered that a number of categories of documents be produced, that certain documents that have redactions, which appear to be redactions of co-conspirators and the bad guys, be submitted in camera to the judge. So the judge can see it and make the determination to remove the redactions.
The other part of the judge's order involves a process for the production of the redaction law or the privilege law
to show the millions of documents that the Trump regime continues to withhold. And the other part of the order by federal by the federal judge involves the FBI notes that were prepared that relate to a 13-year-old who made very serious allegations against Trump, Trump denies the allegations.
“We have the FBI 302 reports themselves, but the Trump regime has refused to produce the notes.”
The handwritten notes that go along with the reports. There's no exception not to produce the notes, but the Trump regime's like, "Yeah, the handwritten notes are duplicative." So we're not going to produce the notes at all. We'll just give you the reports. You just produce the notes in the reports that they're different documents, produce them, but they're covering up notes involving an underage girl
that makes allegations against Trump, Trump denies the allegations. But those are notes that are being withheld. And so what did Donald Trump's DOJ do? Did they just say, "Okay, federal judge, you ordered us to turn over the notes. You ordered us to do the redactions and remove the redactions.
You ordered us to produce the privilege log, the redaction log of all of the documents being withheld." Federal judge, we hear you. There's Epstein transparency act. You've made your ruling judge, we agree. Nope, the DOJ signaled this week.
It will appeal the ruling, requiring removal of redactions to the Epstein files and some other aspects of the judge's order. Look at what was filed right here. Document 36, and by the way, the Trump regime has thrown this guy Andrew Block under the bus. He's their fall guy, in my opinion, for everything. Blanch like his inciting these documents.
They pick someone who doesn't really know about the Epstein files. He shows up in court apparently he looks incredibly nervous and lost in his whole role. But I don't know. I don't know what I'm doing. I don't know what I'm doing.
And just to get yelled at by the federal judge. So here's the defendant's notice of appeal. Defendant respectfully files it's notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit of this Court's June 25, 2026 order. In view of the United States, whether the district court's June 2526 order, is appealable as incunclusive accordingly. The United States submits this protective notice of appeal to the extent that any aspect of this order grants plaintiff and junctive relief.
It is immediately appealable under 28 USC section 1292 A1 and they did that right at the 60 day deadline from when the federal judge's initial order was. So what the federal judge also asked the Trump regime do is to respond to Katie Fang's request that these documents be turned over.
The judge ordered that these documents, the categories I told you about.
The FBI handwritten notes removing reductions of who appear to be co-conspirators and bad guys and produce the privilege or reduction log.
“The judge ordered that the parties submit a proposed order for the judge to sign that just restates with the judge ordered.”
So that happened Katie Fang submitted a proposed order and then the Trump regime this past week filed this document.
Defendants response to minute order. Defendant. This is the DOJ respectfully submits this response pursuant to the court's minute order.
The plaintiff Katie Fang's proposed order if entered by the court would require the department of justice to submit to the court handwritten notes underlying the EFTA numbers and at least the baits numbers.
“And identifies those handwritten notes that likely reference Trump. This is the DOJ writing this EFTA is Epstein files transparency act.”
So it's late. These are the documents are label that it would also require a declaration from defendant Todd Blanche or a representative of the department of justice with personal knowledge regarding the federal register notice.
And it goes on and says with respect to the handwritten notes within 72 days of President Trump signing the Epstein files transparency act into law.
The Department of Justice published millions of pages of records in compliance with the act.
“The task involved more than 500 attorneys and reviewers from the department to reviewed millions of pages of documents on a compressed timeline working days nights weekends and holidays, including Christmas day New Year's Eve and New Year's Day.”
As the department's January 30 letter explains, considering various factors including the volume of documents reviewed the presence of duplicative and partially duplicative documents and the number of attorneys and reviewers involved in consistencies will likely exist in how reviewers applied reductions. So the fact that the plaintiff Katy Fang has identified some handwritten notes underlying the FBI 302 interview reports in the library does not undermine the government stated rationale for withholding such notes that they are duplicative.
The quality control checks are less effective on handwritten material and that the risk of inadvertent disclosure of victim information is substantially higher. Nor does it amount to a waiver or concession as to other documents what in the hell word salad was that the Epstein transparency act DOJ says that you need to turn over these documents you can create your own exception that handwritten notes don't apply just read the handwritten notes and turn them over in your own reading you feel they're duplicative they're not there's a 302 report which is a typed report then there are notes.
The report reports to be based on notes so just produce both look I was a litigator and I was involved in cases involving massive document productions of terabytes of documents. I never said can turn over those handwritten notes duplicative of the report that would never fly there different documents just turn them over what do you even talking about here then the DOJ says it bears noting that with respect to victims names. Plaintive confidently a verb defendants reductions and rationales were not for the victim rather she claim the reductions were a pattern of dissembling and dishonesty in this matter this is false.
It's false that you show it to the judge and shut up and stop lighting and stop hiding it that said the department respectfully maintains its objections to producing any such documents why you why would you reserve your objections if you have nothing to hide just show them like you obviously look like you're hiding something because you are. The court should hesitate before ordering in camera review of any document or reduction a litigant claims is a violation of the Epstein files transparency act that wasn't a miss speak by me.
You said Trump argues with the Trump DOJ argues the federal judge you should hesitate please judge hesitate before ordering in camera review of the documents in camera review just means the judge views it confidently it doesn't get produced until the judge for a season why should the judge not look at it you're trying to hide it from the judge also. Sounds like you're hiding something then the judge can see it and if indeed there's an issue about victims or some other issue the judge can make the call okay i'm not going to produce it because of this that or the other.
You want to hide it from the judge and you're objecting to that that's why i ...
Even if that was the case which it is it you should have produced the documents to begin with.
“So there are millions of documents being with held in millions of reductions that need to be looked at thanks for that admission right there and drew block.”
Review it let the federal judge review the document if this court determines this process is necessary however the department respectfully asked the court to stay its order to allow the government to appeal the jurisdictional issues before the court. If the court says that the court would not have the status quo without a stay an order requiring production aside from limited in camera review would have the effect of irreversibly altering the status quo. I want to reverse the status quo so that the people can see what's in the files i mean is this the craziest document you've ever read i mean the trump regime files a lot of crazy things but this is pretty freaking crazy a for these reason the defendant asked the court not to require a declaration regarding the notice.
The declaration from Todd blan should be done and do not order the production of the interview notes and do not order a review of the documents that are redacted signed.
“Andrew block like that's a real crazy document now finally if you want to know Donald Trump's distraction machine on steroids this week what was behind it as well.”
A man to engaro she was trafficked into the United States by Epstein's trafficker john loop for now when she was 17 years old she met polos on poli the guy who was bringing in young eastern European girls and women. As I'm poli brought in malania as well introduced malania to Donald Trump and agarro never marries on poli they had a kid together she describes this relation with him as just one of the most horrible things ever they had a custody dispute she alleges and the New York Times didn't expose a on this that he used his connections within the trump regime he's currently an ambassador yet he's got an ambassador position.
During Trump's first term on gara was like the ambassador to granada like she had an ambassador position as well.
Because they were very close with Donald and malania because that was the crew right Zom poli introduced malania to Donald they all stay close Zom poli was an ambassador to Dominican and Trump's first term Dominican is also where true social did one of its shady deals were to appear that there was foreign money that was involved that bailed out true social back and like 2021 I did reports and that that was like the island of Dominican but I digress and then. Zom poli's got this ambassador ship position right now he does all of these foreign events for Donald Trump and agarro has previously come out with a statement about malania I will tear down your corrupt system this was a message to bondi I will tear down your corrupt system even if it's the last thing I do in my life I will go all the way I'm not afraid.
“Maybe you should be afraid of what I know of who you are and who your husband is. She said in a post that was dated April 8 and tagged the first lady's ex account.”
She threatened legal action against the first lady and your pedophile husband is what she said then malania called the impromptu press conference at the White House to deny that she had any relationship with Epstein. And agarro said the following ex Brazilian model with ties to malania links Trump envoy to corruption scheme in an interview she gave to Brazilian journalist live streamed over the past few days. Agarro did not implicate Zom poli in the death of the former UN general assembly president who died under mysterious circumstances John Ash.
But she said that he was murdered by Chinese nationals who were involved in a passport scheme. She explained that some poli helped her obtain a diplomatic passport which gave her tax exemptions. She claimed he made purchases on her accounts so that he would not have to pay taxes on those items. At the same time, she said he was running another scam selling passports. They ran a diplomatic passport scheme selling them countries paying one another for votes on the security council.
It's all corrupt there.
John Ash who was president of the general assembly of the United Nations was killed. She said explaining he died because of the scheme.
“A former UN ambassador from Antigua and Barbuda, Ash served as president of the UN general assembly from 2013 to 2014. At the time of his death, he was under indictment for taking bribes from Chinese businessmen.”
Seven others were charged in the scheme. Agarro said she was told that Ash was killed by the Chinese, but she provided no other specifics. I came forward publicly after I was arrested because this guy wouldn't let me live my life referring to Zom poli.
So you have all of these incidents coming out right now. And so no wonder Donald Trump turned on his WMD, his weapon of mass distraction right there for all to see.
“So I wanted to give you those updates. Guy Lane. I wanted to give you the updates of Angaro and then with the Trump DOJ was doing in response to the lawsuit filed by Katie Fang under the Epstein transparency act.”
Thanks so much for watching everybody. We appreciate you. Subscribe. Let's get to seven million before you go. Our book WTF America is available for pre-order now.
It's the story of how we got here and how we fight our way back. To pre-order, scan the QR code or click the link in the description. Let's do this.
