The Rachel Maddow Show
The Rachel Maddow Show

Maddow: Trump is terrible at everything except this one thing

3h ago43:077,265 words
0:000:00

Rachel Maddow makes the case that from the first day of his second term, Donald Trump has been engaged in "a concerted and intense targeting of Black Americans," from firings to executive orders and i...

Transcript

EN

Listen to your favorite MS now shows anytime as a podcast.

Enjoy new episodes of Morning Show, Deadline White House and the Rachel Maddo Show.

Every small D Democratic muscle that we have is flexing.

Plus the last word with Lawrence O'Donnell, the beat with Ari Melber, the weeknight and more. On the go, wherever you get your podcasts, for ad-free listening to all of your favorite shows, subscribe to MS now Premium on Apple Podcasts. Really happy to have you here.

There is a lot that the US government and this presidential administration is failing at right now.

In the courts in public opinion and politics, in the technocratic and practical functions of government,

even some of their schemes and scams are falling apart.

Every day, every new cycle, the list just piles up of things at which they are failing. Today for example, the Justice Department and the Homeland Security Department learned that their officials may be held in contempt of court by a federal judge in Rhode Island. The administration put out a press release lying about this particular judge,

vilifying this particular judge in terms that we're not true,

what it said in the press release about this judge was false. Today in court, the Justice Department's lawyer begged the judges forgiveness for that. He admitted in today's court hearing in Rhode Island that he, in fact, had deliberately withheld information from this judge. He said he only did so because the Department of Homeland Security explicitly instructed him to do that.

That's really bad, but he sort of throws off on the mercy of the court, told the judge he's so sorry.

Lying to a federal judge lying about a federal judge is a really big deal if you're a lawyer or a government official. And even though Trump's Justice Department lawyer, quote, profusely apologized for it in court today, the judge said at this hearing today that she is weighing contempt charges against DOJ officials and Homeland Security officials for the lying. That is very not good. And that happened today while another federal judge, a judge in Alabama, is also weighing a very serious allegation.

A potentially very consequential allegation that DOJ lawyers may have lied to the grand jury in a very high profile case in Alabama. This is the case about the Southern Poverty Law Center, where Trump's DOJ has brought a bizarre prosecution against that longtime civil rights group. The Southern Poverty Law Center in responding to the indictment, they've done something very unusual now. They have now asked the judge in that case to allow them to see, to allow them to see the transcript of what the lawyers from Trump's DOJ actually told the grand jury behind closed doors.

When they went in to talk to that grand jury to convince that grand jury to sign off in the indictment in this civil rights group, they want to know what Trump's DOJ lawyers said to that grand jury. This is a very rare request. This is a very unusual thing to request of the judge in a court case. But the reason they have done it is because in this case, in the Southern Poverty Law Center case, the indictment really makes it seem like Trump's justice department lawyers might have lied to the grand jury.

It might have told them things either about the civil rights group or about the law that were just factually wrong. The arrangement in that case is on Thursday, the judge is right now considering whether to release the grand jury information to the defense. If it happens, if it does turn out that the lawyers at Trump's DOJ lied to the grand jury in order to get that indictment, not only would that instantly end the indictment end the case, it could very easily mean contempt of court or discipline or even disbarment for the Trump lawyers involved here.

The fact that this is even in play in a high profile case like this is unheard of for justice department lawyers. But in Trump's justice department, that's kind of how they roll. They are not great at this. Politically, they're not great at this either. It turns out. And an environment where the Republican Party is embodied essentially entirely by their leader. Well, nobody, nobody else has allowed the oxygen to thrive or speak.

The latest Washington Post ABC News, Episodes Paul, has Trump negative 25 overall. He's 25 points underwater on his overall approval rating. And that's kind of the high point for him in this poll. Minus 25 is kind of as good as it gets on the economy.

His approval rating is 31 points underwater.

On the Iran war is approval rating is 33 points underwater.

On inflation, Trump's approval rating is 45 points underwater.

On Trump's handling of the cost of living, which is effectively what he ran on,

to get a second term in the White House, Trump is 53 points underwater.

76% of the country disapproves of Trump's handling of the cost of living. He's minus 53. As among other things, his war of whim, his war of impulse, this war of choice that he doesn't even seem to understand, drags on with no end in sight and the energy crisis he caused by starting this inexplicable war just gets worse and worse with gas prices continuing their steady steep rise.

They are really, really not great at this. They're not good at this. We're also now seeing every day the practical impact of what it means that they kicked off this second presidential term for Donald Trump by wholesale breaking the government. In every way they could figure out to do it. And we're seeing that in very practical ways. Like, regardless of your politics, regardless of your ideological can't.

We're seeing it in very practical consequences. Last month's tornado outbreak in Kansas City, Kansas. Trees damaged, homestamaged, mobile homes and RVs overturned, people injured. Turns out people had basically no warning of those tornadoes last month. And why not?

Usually a tornado watch goes up a few hours before storms are anticipated. But in the Kansas City, Kansas tornadoes last month, they only got the tornado watch up about 30 minutes before the first storm hit. That's not the warning. Hey, it's coming. That's the watch. Which usually gives you hours of notice to let you know that tornadoes are a possibility that day. They only got 30 minutes before the watch. No time to get ready.

Which undoubtedly affected people's preparedness and undoubtedly affected the amount of damage. And potentially the number of injuries.

What happened there? Why, why would the people get no notice?

Quote, many forecasting offices and the great planes did not launch weather balloons at 7 a.m. that day as they have for decades. And why didn't the National Weather Service offices launch the weather balloons that morning?

As they always have every 7 a.m. every day for decades.

Well, thank Donald Trump. Weather balloon launches was one of the first things that had to go when Donald Trump and his infinite wisdom started radically cutting the staffing levels at the National Weather Service. And no of the National Oceanic and atmospheric administration. Why did he cut those jobs? What do you have against weather forecasting in tornado watches? Who knows? But there is your tornado warning system on Trumpism. And again, this isn't, you know, this isn't abstract. This isn't theoretical. It isn't ideological.

It's just failure. It's what happens when you break things. It turns out then they're broken. So they don't work when you need them to work. They really are not great at this. The Trump administration in its infinite wisdom also this year radically has screwed up its agriculture numbers, which has turned out to be a huge expensive catastrophe. There's a by-line Kansas City Missouri from the New York Times after Trump's agriculture department made its estimate last summer of how much corn American farmers would harvest this year.

The projection had to be repeatedly revised upward until in January the department found 1.3 million more acres of corn that it had not accounted for in its earlier estimate.

1.3 million acres is an area, quote, larger than Delaware.

Why is this estimate important? Well, traders use this estimate to buy and sell commodities, affecting the prices that farmers receive for their crops.

Farmers use the estimate to make decisions about how and when to try to sell their crop for the most money. But under Donald Trump, the apparent that U.S. government is apparently no longer capable of making these very basic estimates. Quote, it was a miss. No other way to call it. It was the department's worst projection in recent memory. And why did they screw this up? Why didn't it happen? I don't know. You tell me, quote, it came as the Trump administration was cutting staff at the agriculture department.

The agriculture department lost 23,000 employees in 2025 as Elon Musk's doge slashed jobs across the federal government. The National Agriculture Statistics Service, which produces the crop reports, was one of the hardest hit divisions.

They took it's staff from about 800 down to about 500.

Yeah, and then weirdly, it turns out the crop reports started sucking worse than they ever had.

Which kicks American farmers in the teeth right at the moment that Trump's other genius policies mean they can't afford fertilizer or diesel for their tractors or for the trucks to get their harvest to market.

If anyone in the world will still buy their harvest since Trump screwed all that up with his tariffs adventure as well. I mean, they're really not good at this. As the war in Iran seems to have become a hot war again today, with U.S. and Iranian ships firing at each other in the state of Formus, President Trump has decided at the same time that he's going to pull 5,000 U.S. troops out of Germany. Now, wait, why does that matter for the Iran war? Germany isn't Iran.

Well, when Trump started the war in Iran, without hardening or protecting any of our gazillion military bases and installations all over the Middle East, which were now in the range of fire for Iranian missiles and drones, oops.

Where do you think they sent the U.S. troops who had to be evacuated really quickly off of all of those undefeated bases all over the Middle East?

Where they sent them. They sent them to Germany because we have a really big troop presence in Germany and lots of facilities for our troops in Germany. There have been hundreds of U.S. troops wounded in Trump's Iran war so far. Where do U.S. troops get evacuated to when they're wounded in the Middle East? They get evacuated to Germany because we have such a big troop presence there and lots of military facilities there to handle those things.

Trump is now sending 5,000 American troops home from that crucial position.

Trump is simultaneously re-upping the war in the Middle East and also shrinking our ability to support that war from the place where we support a war like that, which is Germany. Why did he decide to do this now? Simultaneously, uping the Iran war and also taking away the military's ability to support the troops that are there fighting the war.

Why did he decide to do this now? Where did he get this idea?

Well, you know, little clue in the fact that he's done this exact same thing before.

In his first term in 2020, you might remember this.

He went down exactly the same way. In 2020, Trump announced that he was going to take thousands of U.S. troops out of Germany. And the Pentagon was totally blindsided. Nobody could figure out why he announced it. Turns out he had just talked to Vladimir Putin right before making that announcement about pulling U.S. troops out of Germany. Of course, you know, Putin more than anything wants U.S. troops out of all of Europe. He was delighted. Then that was in June 2020. Then the following month, July 2020, Trump talked to Putin again.

And right after talking to Putin again, Trump reiterated more forcefully this time. I really mean it. I want those thousands of U.S. troops taken out of Germany.

The only reason it ultimately didn't happen back then is because that was already laid in the year in 2020.

And then Trump lost the presidential election in President Joe Biden countermandered Trump's ridiculous nonsensical order. But now, Trump's back in the White House. And so here we are again. And it's gone down exactly the same way. President publicly announced that he wants thousands of U.S. troops pulled out of Germany. The Pentagon, once again, totally blindsided. Nobody knows why he has done this. Then it turns out it emerges that he made this announcement about pulling U.S. troops out of Germany right after he got off the phone with Vladimir Putin.

Pulling U.S. troops out of Germany is something that Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin really, really want something that would be terrible for the United States, but really good for Vladimir Putin. Somehow magically, every time Trump talks to Vladimir Putin, he emerges from that phone call with this same idea over and over again, to give the Kremlin what it wants. Even though it is terrible for the United States and particularly terrible for the United States military right now, while they're fighting a war in the Middle East, that Trump started for who knows what reason.

They're not good at this. It was three months ago tonight when the President posted online a video depicting former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama as if they were apes. President Trump did later take it down. He refused to apologize for it and still hasn't to this day. That was three months ago. It was five months ago when Donald Trump confirmed something that he had previously long denied.

Back in his first term, President Trump had told a group of senators at the W...

According to reporting at the time, he named some predominantly black countries and he said they were S.H.L. countries and couldn't we instead have immigrants from predominantly white countries? You mentioned Norway. Since countries with white populations are apparently good, and countries with black populations are swear words.

So Donald Trump said that in his first term, and when it was reported that he had said that he denied it, he said he had never ever used that language.

But then just a few months ago he started bragging proudly. Weirdly at a speech in Pennsylvania, he started bragging that yes, actually, despite all those earlier denials, of course he had used that term and moreover he still believes it predominantly black countries are S.H.L. countries.

I think it's clear from just the repeated daily news cycle.

I think this administration is bad at everything they set their mind to. They're terrible in the courts. To the point where their performance in court jeopardizes the law licenses of everybody who speaks for them. They're terrible in the court of public opinion, which you can see in the polls, which is going to have a big political impact on them. The next time people get a chance to vote for them on mass.

They're terrible, really terrible, and all the technocratic practical stuff government is supposed to do, including like basic stuff like the weather. They're terrible at war, terrible at diplomacy, they're even terrible at hiding the ball in terms of how much this president does whatever Vladimir Putin wants, even when it makes no sense for us. They're just not great.

They're bad at basically everything they try to do.

But on the issue of race, on the treatment of African Americans, specifically. Even being terrible at what they're doing has still proven to be disastrous for our country. And it is, in part, the posturing and the messaging and the racist vibes from the White House and the president. That is stuff that validates and excites the worst bigots in the country, and that is consequential. But it's more than that too.

We are now about 16 months into what has been from day one, a concerted and intense targeting of black Americans, specifically by this president and by this administration.

On his first full day in office, he proclaims war on diversity efforts, not only in government, but in any institution in the country over which he can exert leverage.

Everything from schools and universities to law firms to private businesses of every stripe.

He then immediately started firing some of the highest profile black public officials in the whole U.S. government, seemingly regardless of any other thing about them. I mean, right away, we get the firing of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Charles C. Cube Brown. We get the firing of the Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, and then it's Gwyn Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board. And then it's Robert Primus, the chair of the Surface Transportation Board. And then it's Alvin Brown from the NTSB, and then it's Peggy Carr, the head of the National Center for Education Statistics.

And then it's Willie Phillips from FERC from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. And then it's Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and on and on and on. When Trump and his top political donor Elon Musk then started just locking off huge swamps of the federal government to disastrous practical effect. The largest and most egregious cuts targeted federal agencies that employed a disproportionate number of black employees. Reporter Erica Green wrote about this few months ago for the times noting that nothing had moved backwards in the federal government for black Americans this quickly or this far.

And over a hundred years, since Woodrow Wilson came in in 1912 and resegregated the federal workforce. "Black employees were fired or demoted to lower-level jobs relegated to separate and inferior lunchrooms and other facilities and accused of making white women feel unsafe. Those who remained were humiliated. A black worker in the postal service was surrounded by screens. So white workers would not have to look at him. Another employee had a cage built around him to separate him from his white counterparts.

A clerk in the Treasury Secretary's office was assigned to rewrite all correspondence to address black employees by their first names.

The way Trump addressed the librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, by her first name when he crowed publicly about firing her for no reason. In the year of our Lord 25 and now 26, this president and this administration is not just inheriting that history from the Wilson administration.

It's furthering it in its own ways.

Since 1965, there has been an executive order in effect. It was signed by Lyndon Johnson, 1965. Since 1965, all federal contractors have been banned by executive order from discriminating on the basis of race. The basis of race, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender, identity, or national origin.

Donald Trump rescinded that 1965 rule on his first full day in office.

Less than a month later, Trump announced another rule change. The rescinded clause 52.222-21 of the federal acquisition regulation, which doesn't sound like much, but I'll tell you what the title of that is. It's prohibition of segregated facilities.

That's what Trump rescinded less than one month into being back in the White House.

That section reads, quote, "The contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained." That anti-segregation clause has been in government contracts for decades. Donald Trump overtly reached out to rescind it. Which means, butly, that the federal government no longer explicitly prohibits contractors from having segregated restaurants, waiting rooms, and drinking fountains.

Make America great again, right? Recently fired and sideline to employees in the Department of Housing and Urban Development have started sounding the alarm that the Trump administration is no longer just bluntly no longer enforcing a federal law known as the Fair Housing Act. Fair Housing Act, another pillar of the civil rights movements and its achievements. Fair Housing Act dates to 1968 that says you can't refuse to rent to someone or refuse to sell a house to someone on account of their race or their color or religion or national origin or any other factor against which we're supposed to be protected from discrimination.

According to current and former employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development under Donald Trump, they have dropped.

They have dropped enforcement of the federal housing act.

And Trump's first year back in office, black unemployment spiked in this country from 6.2 percent, all the way up to 7.5 percent, making it the highest of all racial groups.

Under Joe Biden, black unemployment had been at a record low of 4.8 percent, spiking now under Donald Trump. The Trump administration generally speaking is bad at its work, it is bad at what it sets its mind to in all sorts of ways. But black Americans, African Americans have been targeted by this administration in a concerted way. That has nevertheless been devastating, even though the Trump administration isn't good at anything they set their mind to. And that was all before the conservative majority on the US Supreme Court, including all of Trump's appointees voted to effectively end the voting rights act a few days ago.

As soon as the court said they would take up that case, people started mapping the worst case scenario for what Trump and the Republicans would do, particularly in the south, if the court got it.

The voting rights act of 1965, the crowning achievement of the civil civil rights movement. And before and after, looks like the snap back after the end of reconstruction after the civil war. I mean, look at the state of Louisiana there.

A third of the population of Louisiana is black.

Louisiana's Republican Governor canceled congressional elections that are already underway in that state to rush through new maps that will presumably make sure that even though one third of the population of that state is black, there will be no black representation in Congress for Louisiana at all. South Carolina, a quarter of the population is black. They have one majority minority district represented by an African American Democrat Jim Clyburn. They are going to try to get rid of that one black district.

So that South Carolina is all white, all Republican and representation. Well, a quarter of the people who live in that state are black. In Tennessee, one in six residences black. Republicans now want to make sure all nine congressional seats in Tennessee are white, all nine of them. They want it to be nine nine nine to nothing, white and Republican.

And one in six people in that state is black. And her descent from the majority ruling. Justice Elena Cagan said it will likely cause the largest reduction to minority representation since the end of reconstruction.

She probably didn't need to use the word likely there.

The war on black Americans that is being waged by this president and this Republican party is one of the only things they have put their mind to in this past year that they've actually done pretty well at.

A comprehensive attack on black public officials and black public power.

A comprehensive attack on black public officials in the federal government. Black employees in the federal government. Black representatives in Congress. And now all around the country where everywhere Republicans are in charge. They are scrambling to make sure that black public officials can no longer hold office.

We're going to talk tonight about the pushback against that and the strategies to make them pay for it both in Louisiana, which is ground zero here and around the country. We're going to talk tonight about some surprising pushback from churches and the clergy. We're going to talk tonight about a blistering take down of Trump and the administration in federal court in Washington in a most unexpected case. But big picture here. We are in the middle of something really radical in this country.

Not just to get rid of our constitutional republic. To replace our form of government with something else. We'll get rid of the multi-racial democracy that our Constitution is supposed to protect. It is a war on black America. The fight to save it is looking like it's going to be the fight of all of our lives.

More head to night stay with us. Stay up to date on the biggest issues of the day with the MS now Daily Newsletter. An analysis by experts you trust video highlights from your favorite shows plus updates on our latest podcasts and election coverage. Sign up at MS.now. Democrats currently hold about two dozen congressional seats in the American South on this map.

Those are the islands of blue. Now that the Supreme Court has cleared the way for Republicans to erase majority minority districts by getting the voting rights act. Some estimates say Republicans could pick up a minimum of half of those seats at least a dozen. People who study this thing say that by 2028 Republicans could draw maps that would give them as many as 19 of those seats in the house.

One analysis shows the congressional black caucus shrinking by as much as a third.

That's the risk.

That's what Democrats are looking at if they do nothing.

But what if Democrats fight back with every single thing they've got? What if Democrats everywhere they can draw maps that maximally favor them? The voting rights group fair fight action estimates that Democrats could pick up 10 seats by 2028. Democrats could pick up 10 seats using maps drawn in states where Democrats control the state legislature. If Democrats gain control of more state legislatures, say this year in November, if they win in places like say Wisconsin, they could pick up as many as 22 seats.

Which would all but erase any advantage Republicans are about to give themselves by losing the voting rights acts protections.

The first thing that means is that races for state legislatures state house and state senate this year just got way more important.

In the immediate run and the right here right now, Democrats are already taking steps to protect what they have to try to expand the map. Today the Democratic leader in the house came Jeffrey said he's already talking to Democratic officials in his home state of New York to come up with a plan for new maps there and time for 2028. He said today quote, this is just the beginning across the nation we will sue we will redraw and we will win.

We will sue part of that strategy is key because Democrats and voting rights groups are also pushing back in the courts wherever they can.

As I mentioned at the top of the show the Republican governor of Louisiana just took the extraordinary step of announcing it was an emergency. And stopping an election that was already underway specifically so his state can draw new maps that favor Republicans and that disfavor black voters in Louisiana. Today a coalition of voters in voting rights groups sued the governor for stopping those elections after Louisiana and since already started to vote. And a statement announcing the lawsuit they said by attempting to suspend it ongoing election state officials are creating confusion undermining public trust and placing partisan interests above the constitutional rights of Louisiana voters black voters and communities that have long fought for equal political representation should not be forced to bear the burden of unlawful power grabs designed to silence their voices.

Elections belong to the people not to politicians seeking to manipulate the rules. Joining us now is attorney Sophia Men Lake and she is director of the ACLU's voting rights project the ACLU is representing those voters and civil rights groups in court. Ms. Lake and thanks very much for being here appreciate being here in person.

Thank you for having me so first of all if I said anything about the situation in Louisiana or what the governor there is doing what this case is about that strikes you wrong or the wrong way around.

I don't know not at all unfortunately canceling an election after people have...

Can you help us understand the legal arguments here what this case is about.

Sure you know this is actually the second case that we filed we filed a an action on Friday in state court saying the governor actually doesn't have the authority to issue this proclamation the executive order to try to suspend.

And the elections in attempt to stop this before early voting in person started on Saturday unfortunately the court denied our temporary restraining order there so we have since as you've pointed out moved in federal court today to try once again to put a stop on what's creating massive confusion.

You know we are hearing Republican election administrators calling this a nightmare for election administrators it is chaotic people don't understand what the situation is.

There are actually elections that are proceeding irrespective of the suspension right there are other things on the ballot as well so voters think that.

The election is off they may not have their opportunities to even vote in those other elections too so we're talking about tens of thousands of voters who have turned out who have cast ballots already having their ballots suspended and where are.

Potentially canceled a true disenfranchisement of voters in the very real sense of the word so voters are being handed a ballot where there's say where there's lots of different races in the ballot they're being told some of your votes here will count but some of them won. You don't know if there are any votes of when you want to cast votes for that other election we'll let you know later but if you cast it now we're not going to count that but we promised what count the other things. I mean I can't imagine that voters I mean any voter would be confused in that circumstance but what's the remedy you could even seek with you know 80,000 people have already voted that can retroactively fix the confusion that's already been cast over this this election.

Well that's what we're trying to do well by going in very quickly asking for temporary restraining order to say please halt the enforcement of this suspension of the election let it go forward.

Cast count everyone's votes that have been currently cast and continue on with this election if you want to redraw these maps we can talk about that at a later date but at this moment in time you're just causing chaos or disenfranchising voters you're creating a situation that nobody wants to see when it comes to talking about elections that have integrity.

We know that the ACLU is also involved in a number of other cases over gerrymandering and racial discrimination places like North Carolina Texas and Missouri.

How does this sort of world shaking Supreme Court decision affect the legal battle in those kinds of cases. It's an extraordinary gut punch to the work that we have been doing to protect fair maps for voters of color you know the Supreme Court in its majority opinion describes this as an update to the voting rights act when as Justice Kagan points out in her descent it is all but dead. And that's really going to be a challenge for us going forward this is one of the principal tools that we have used to bring progress to this country to bring diversity in our representation to ensure that voters of color have a say and equal say in our political process and it's going to be a difficult without this primary legal tool to ensure that we are rolled back to a time before the voting rights act to a time of Jim Crow.

You will then like and a director of the ACLU's voting rights project you have your work cut out for you. Thanks for being here to all of us understand. Thank you for having me. Appreciate it. All right. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Stay up to date on the biggest issues of the day with the MS now daily newsletter analysis by experts you trust video highlights from your favorite shows plus updates on our latest podcasts and election coverage sign up at MS dot now. Last week on the show we showed you some of these images from Providence Rhode Island this was outside the citizens bank annual shareholders meeting.

These folks were demanding that citizens bank which is based in the northeast. They should drop the big financial investments that bank has in to private companies that run immigrant prisons for the Trump administration. And it was not just at that shareholders meeting there have been protests all across the northeast specifically targeting citizens bank because of its involvement with Trump's immigration prisons citizens bank stop funding ice prisons. One Rhode Island union has now said it's withdrawing hundreds of thousands of dollars from citizens bank and protest of what citizens is doing with Trump's immigrant prisons on top of that coalition of dozens of religious groups in Boston.

They've announced that they will be pulling a million dollars out of the bank...

They made that threat that that that charge basically last week in a statement citizens bank said in response that it does not comment on specific customer or client partnerships.

But after having put that charge to citizens bank last week well that coalition of religious groups the greater Boston interfaith organization.

They say this meeting they've asked for with citizens bank and its executives has not been forthcoming and so they say as of today they're following through and what they said they're going to do. The members of this interfaith group ministers pastor is rabbis they all gathered at a citizens bank branch in Boston today to follow through on their pledge.

They withdrew one million dollars from the bank.

That's not only this interfaith group has like something like fourteen million dollars in the bank altogether they say they're going to keep pulling it out a million at a time as long as citizen doesn't citizens bank doesn't change its ways.

They even brought this giant one million dollar withdrawal slip with them for today's announcement.

Among the speakers today was Reverend John Ederton senior minister of old South church in Boston's back bay who said in part we are here today because we need to let the banks know that people of good faith people of good conscience. People of good will are neighbors will not stand for building private prisons for building deportation machines for crushing our neighbors underneath their wheels for profit. No he said no not with our money joining us now is the Reverend John Ederton senior minister of old South church in Boston Reverend thank you so much for being here really appreciate you making time.

Well thank you so much Rachel for having me really appreciate it and given the opportunity to speak to your audience. How did this come about why did the greater Boston interfaith organization decide to start pressing citizens bank this way.

We pulled a million dollars out today we transferred it to another bank because we want citizens to stop doing this dirty business citizens is one of the only banks in the country that.

Banks with and provides financing for course of it NGO group two of the most notorious private prison companies in this country. This year a manual domis who is a neighbor a Boston resident of the 56 year old man he died in course civic detention in Arizona from a toothache. He had a toothache a complaint about it they didn't give him proper care his toothache became an infection his infection became substance and he died. These are the practices that course civic is notorious for NGO group is notorious for and they will not be abusing our neighbors not with our money.

I got the sense from the speeches today from you and your fellow clergy who are part of this interfaith group I got the sense that citizens bank is not. It's simple they're not a sort of a distant corporate obstruction to you as a bank that is based in the northeast as a bank that is something that deals individually with all the different faith organizations churches and synagogues and mosques that are part of the interfaith organization. I got the sense that US faith leaders in Boston have a real relationship with citizens bank and that that is part of why it both pains you and motivate you that you haven't been able to shift them on this is that fair.

We feel deeply betrayed by what citizens bank is doing 20 years ago we helped them to build relationships in the immigrant community so that they could expand their business and since then they have turned into an organization we don't recognize into an institution we don't recognize anymore rather than partnering with and building up all of our neighbors in Boston instead they are making money tearing families apart and it is.

Uncontrollable it is against the basic values of this country and it is something that I find religiously important.

Do you and your fellow clergy who are part of the centerfaith group plan to continue to withdraw more money from the bank as a way of sort of ramping up the pressure you hearing from any other. Faith organizations or non-profits or entities that bank with citizens who may want to follow your lead on this. Today a sister organization greater Cleveland congregations joined they pledged that they would pledge their deposits toward this as well.

So we are now well over 14 and a half million dollars of deposits we are customers of citizens we don't want to hurt citizens they are.

We are 20 year customers with 14 and a half million dollars and growing of deposits that are ours and we want for them to do what is right their core customer base is in Massachusetts Rhode Island.

Across New England they are fast becoming the ice bank and if they think bein...

And that is what we are trying to do is give them some good advice which is that they need to stop being involved in this dirty business.

Reverend John Ederton senior minister of old south church in Boston.

Reverend thank you so much for your time keep a surprise we're really interested in this campaign both for what it means in New England but also I think the kind of model that presents around the country we'd love to to savvy again and to hear how close. Wonderful absolutely any time really appreciate it Rachel alright we'll be right back stay with us. This is the East Potomac golf course in Washington DC it's a public course so that needs not to be a member anybody can sign up to play there.

I don't know anything about golf.

I can't tell golf from many golf. But I can't tell you that East Potomac is thought of as a really beautiful course it's a lovely and well-loved amenity in New York excuse me in DC. Our least it was last year after President Donald Trump demolished the East Wing of the White House bulldozed it surprised on his own say so to build himself a ballroom nobody asked for. After he bulldozed and tore down the historic East Wing of the White House he had the dirt and the rubble from that hold away from the White House in trucks and had those trucks dump it all at the East Potomac golf course.

With again no warning or explanation.

That's nice like I said this is a public golf course this is not one of Donald Trump's private golf clubs this belongs to the people.

But then this this even after he turned into his own personal construction dump how did that happen?

The Trump administration then announced that they were going to seize control of that course and DC's two other public golf courses as well. Again no consultation no explanation just give me just hungry hungry hippostyle I'm taking it. At East Potomac there was reporting that the White House plan to shut the course down as early as this week as early as today. The legal advocacy group democracy forward sued the Trump administration to try to stop them from taking control of this this course which is part of a whole park that belongs to the taxpayers and not to the White House or Donald Trump.

Today the judge in the case told the Trump administration and no uncertain terms that the East Potomac golf course must stay open.

And the administration cannot make any significant changes to it without notice or approval.

The judge today in court warned of the White House that if so much as a shovel is seen at East Potomac if anything even resembling heavy machinery pulls into its parking lot. He said there's going to be hell to pay quote let's just say given some issues around the district recently I would have a particular concern that we not ask we not act first and ask forgiveness later. She said quote if anyone orders big things to show up by big things I mean anything bigger than my sedan then I want the plaintiffs to have notice.

Anything bigger than nice sedan. Got it. Tea times that the East Potomac golf course are available right in early tomorrow morning and every morning from here on out they are not going without a fight. Stay with us. All right, that's going to do it for me tonight. Thanks for being here. Listen to your favorite MS now shows anytime as a podcast enjoying new episodes of Morning Joe deadline White House and the Rachel Maddo show. Every small D democratic muscle that we have is flexing plus the last word with Lawrence O'Donnell the beat with our email.

The weeknight and more on the go wherever you get your podcasts for ad free listening to all of your favorite shows subscribe to MS now premium on apple podcasts. [BLANK_AUDIO]

Compare and Explore