#675 - Professor Jiang

predictive history where he breaks down why global events happen and what could come next. We covered a lot of ground here, war in the Middle East, China, Versa-America, Secret Societies, I had a fascinating chat with today's guest, Professor Young. Professor Young? Hey, Theo.

Is that correct? That's correct. Yeah. Professor Young, thank you so much for coming by today. Well, thanks so much for inviting me.

Yeah. Very happy to have you.

Is this your first time in Los Angeles?

It's my first time in Los Angeles. Yeah. And how's it? How's the experience been so far? It's been surreal.

So, your producers have been wonderful, they put me in this fantastic hotel and I went for walk around the neighborhood, West Hollywood, so I went down San Monica Boulevard. Oh, it's just gorgeous, just the streets are so illuminated and the business are so beautiful. But then, you know, as I'm walking, there's in the middle of the sidewalk, a pile of dog shit.

Yeah. So, I walk past it and it takes me a couple of minutes to realize that didn't come for a dog actually. Yeah. Yeah.

So, yeah. It's been surreal. Yeah. We got a lot of tall dogs in this area. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. It's got a goose here. And if you're lucky, you'll have a needle in it in the middle. It's freed up, man.

Yeah. It is freed up, man. Professor Jean, thank you so much for just making the trip for coming and joining us. I know you're from your channel, your YouTube channel, predictive history. Can you tell us a little bit about your channel for people that don't know about it?

Yeah. So, I'm a high school teacher. And what I try to do is try to explain your politics in a way that students can appreciate. What I try to do is, when my analysis, I try to make predictions. And that's a really good way to engage students as well as to test my own world view,

my own hypothesis. And so, two years ago, while I was taking this class, I made three predictions. The first is that Trump would win in 2024 and that he would launch this war against Iran and that he would lose this war. And I blow up online because it turns out that all three predictions should not be accurate.

Well, I've the first two for sure, and that's how you came on my radar with those two predictions.

“That's how I learned about you at first, and before we move on with it, you teach at high school?”

That's right. I teach at high school level. What's something that's kind of unique about a school in China, maybe that we wouldn't know? Well, there are no guns.

Oh, okay. Yeah. Good. You win. You win.

Sorry. I'm sorry. Yeah. So, so I've been China and we're just brainwashed on the title of American schools. American culture.

At least you're brainwashed. Not to have guns in school. Yeah. That's some of the positive brainwashing, at least. Yeah.

Yeah. You came on my radar whenever I saw the videos about your, your predicting your Trump win and predicting the war in Iran. I noticed that you used something called game theory. Yes.

Can you explain game theory just so people know? Yeah.

“The game theory is that if you want to analyze someone's behavior, you have to look at”

three things. First of all, you have to look at the structure of the game. How do you win the game, whether rules or the incentives? And when you figure that out, then you can figure out his or her opt-on behavior in this game.

So in terms of geopolitics, just imagine the United States, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia, as distinct players in the game, which they're trying to maximize the outcome against each other. And they will use their own unique strategies in order to achieve so.

And that's how I'm able to make some amazing predictions.

Yeah. I know the game theory. I remember first hearing about it in that film, beautiful mind. Oh, yes. Yes.

Who was the, what was the guy's name, Nick? John Nash. John Nash. Yeah. He uses that whenever they're, whenever he's examining things or trying to figure things out,

he uses that in there. Anyway, crazy, too. Yeah. Anyway, crazy. So, that's a lot.

Right. Thank you. That's a lot, Professor. Yeah. Let's talk about the war in Iran.

Let's start there because that's fresh. That's when everybody's mind right now. Yeah.

“Do you think it could be our new Vietnam or how are you viewing the war in Iran right now?”

Yeah. The besky scenario is that it becomes America's Vietnam.

But I think the problem is--

That's best case scenario. That's best case scenario.

I think the problem is that this war is expanding very rapidly.

So before, a few months ago, it was limited to a war between Israel, United States, and Iran. And now it's brought in Saudi Arabia against the Hufi's, which is in Yemen. There's a credible threat that the war in Ukraine might merge with the war in Iran. Yeah.

Yes, because what's happened a couple weeks ago is that a Iranian cargo ship that was transplanted supplies from Russia to Iran through the Kaspian Sea was hit by a Ukrainian drone and since then, the Ukrainians have apologized. But the Ukrainian game theory, right now, the Ukrainians aren't doing so well in Ukraine. And right now, Russia is fighting a war of attrition, and because Russia is such a much bigger

power than Ukraine, in a long term, Ukraine was when it loosens war. So to change that dynamic, what Zelensky wants to do is lure America into the war.

“And the best way he can do that is combine the two fronts.”

So if Zelensky shows that Russia can supply Iran for the Kaspian Sea, then America needs to stop this trade, and Ukraine can help America by sending drones to attack Iranian shipping. So there's a real threat that these two fronts merge in which case all bets are off, in which case it's War III, and you can also see the possibility of systems collapse, civilization of collapse as well.

All of that, from that, from that. The reason why is that area, Ukraine, the Middle East, it's really the nexus or the heart of the global economy, because that's where the world is. We can Ukraine, the Middle East, they're pretty far from me, so they can even show me on this globe, actually help far away from Iran.

Right, right. So this is really interesting, okay? So this is Iran, and you can move that close. Okay, sure. Yeah.

“So what I want to show you is how far these fronts are, okay?”

Okay. So this war in Ukraine has been going on since 2022, right? It's been four years, and most of the funding is going on in Eastern Ukraine, right? Right here, and fortunately, the war has been limited to just front. Now as of late February, Iran, this war in Iran has broken out, and what's been happening

is that at first, the main conflict was over the short of homoose, which is right here.

But the problem is the entire Middle East depends on the short of homoose for trade.

So Saudi Arabia, Iran, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, what they do is take their oil, and then they transport it all the way for the Shirmlaqa to East Asia and to India and Pakistan. So really the oil from the Middle East feeds the economies of Asia, you're going to place like Japan. It depends on the three quarter of its oil from over here, and China depends on 40% India, it's like 50% to 60%.

In return, these places will send food over back to the Middle East as well as water, because this place is a desert, they don't have their own food and water. But now what people don't appreciate is that there are lots of byproducts of oil production. And one of these byproducts is fertilizer for food, and this fertilizer also translates

“food that you have to remove to Africa, and this fertilizer feeds their population.”

So imagine what happens if this entire air shuts down, right? You can have famine in Africa, you can have agma collapse in East Asia, which would then cause a domino effect where Africa breaks down, you have civil war revolution in Africa. Then what happens? These migrants shift over to Europe. We've already seen that last week when you have the 50,000, essentially Malaysia, Spain.

That's right, a place called Ciutu, Spain. Right, and that's a small part of Spain that's actually connected to Morocco, right? That's right. We're going to see how volatile the situation is. So it's really a domino effect.

Right, now Ukraine is very important because Ukraine and Russia together supplies the

world with one third of its carbohydrates.

So what Ukraine say that again, Ukraine and Russia together supply the world with the third of their carbohydrates? So yeah, so what we're saying is a third of the world's carbohydrates comes from Ukraine and Russia together. Wow, is that true?

Yeah, so Ukraine is a bread basket of Europe.

The claim is not accurate if it means that one third of all carbohydrates eaten or produced

globally come from us or in Ukraine.

“And more accurate version is Russia and Ukraine have supplied roughly 12% of internationally”

traded food calories in a very large share of specific grain export markets about 28 to 30% of globally traded wheat. So there is a huge amount of food calories that comes out of there. That's right. So that is true.

That's right. Yeah. Okay. So thanks so much for fact checking me. But yeah, but you can appreciate how the world depends on food, fertilizer, and energy

from this area. And so the great threat is that because Russia can supply Iran for the Kaspian Sea, the war extends to the North and Caucasus, which brings in Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. And then if that would happen, you can see this entire area is now engulfed in war.

“Another really critical thing that's been happening these past few weeks is that more and”

more nations are being brought in to this war, which were into the one in the Middle East. In the Middle East. And the reason why is that for Iran to pressure the United States, what Iran can do is threaten the energy infrastructure of American allies in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Iran, what Iran can do is hold the energy infrastructure of Middle East hostage.

Imagine Saudi Arabia as this huge oil field, and it's great in a time of peace because you can take this huge oil field and sell it to Japan, China, South Korea, India.

But the problem is that a huge oil field means it's a lake of gasoline.

So all they do is take a match, light it on fire, and then everything blows up. And you can do that with its drone and ballistic missile capabilities. And so Iran is always threatening this. The other issue is that Iran has proxies, meaning allies in the Middle East, and there are three major allies.

The first are a people called the Houthis, who are these religious, fanatic people who live in the mountains. And they occupy a very strategic area called the Bell-El-Mandab-Strait. Bell-El-Mandab-Strait? Yes.

Yes. Yes. This is the Bell-El-Mandab-Strait.

And as you can see, these are the two most critical maritime choke points in the Middle

East. And the problem is that the Houthis are live in mountains. So it's almost impossible to dislodge them. And because so much of maritime shipping requires insurance, any threat of destruction means that the insurance companies don't want to ensure these ships and that puts a hold on global

trade. So the real fear is that Saudi Arabia will launch a ground invasion to dislodge the Houthis and control this choke point. So you can imagine a massive alliance being formed to go against the Houthis. Another major proxy is called Hezbollah, which is in Lebanon.

And this past few weeks, Israel has been trying to attack Hezbollah. And there's a real threat that this era Lebanon breaks out into total war. And right now what Israel is trying to do is assemble an alliance to destroy Hezbollah. And this alliance includes Israel, but it also includes Syria, and also includes the Lebanese army.

And Hezbollah is a proxy of Iran. So Iran, if it sees Hezbollah under threat, then Iran would extend the war in order to help out Hezbollah. But why would the Lebanese army support Israel if there hasn't been issues between Israel and Lebanon recently?

Right.

“So like hasn't there been attacks in Lebanon from Israel?”

Right. Israel is attacking Lebanon because it sees Hezbollah as a threat, because Hezbollah can launch rocket attacks against Israel and Lebanon can threaten -- sorry, Hezbollah can threaten the Swiss canal. Because Israel has been attacking Lebanon, right?

That's right. Okay, great. So Lebanon, Hezbollah is not part of the Lebanese government. And so imagine there are different satirian groups in Lebanon and they share power together. And one of these groups is Hezbollah.

And Hezbollah is aligned with Iran, and they are committed to protecting themselves from Israel.

And so Hezbollah -- the problem of Hezbollah is that it's actually popular in Lebanon.

Among the Lebanese people, because unlike the Lebanese government, they're not corrupt and they provide good services to the people, understood. So yes, sometimes we hear about these groups. You hear about Hamas. You hear about Hezbollah.

Yes. But the people there in some of these countries actually prefer some of these groups are actually do support some of these groups because they're kind of an outlier government that's more supportive to the people than the actual government. That's right.

So they're popular because they are able to provide basic community services to the local population. And unfortunately, these governments in the Middle East, a lot of them have put to be very corrupt. And a lot of their leaders seem to be sympathetic towards Israeli interests.

And people suspect that they've been blackmailed by Mossad because Mossad's very good at that. Yeah.

“What kind of blackmail could Mossad be doing do you feel like in these spaces?”

Like, you talk about blackmail and you hear about blackmail a lot. Yeah. Blackmail in America a lot, like with the Epstein files in different places holding things potentially over like American politicians heads. So I think that rather than use word blackmail, I think we can use the word influence.

How are they able to have so much influence in the area? Well, I mean, the easiest way is to become friends with these people, right? So let's just say you're a leader of Lebanon. Well, you have children. Don't you want your children to go to the best schools?

Don't you want your children to get good jobs? Maybe working for like Goldman Sachs, maybe working for university as a professor? Well, we can help you because we're all these friends in the United States. And we can arrange visas for your kids to go study at elite universities. We can ensure that they get good jobs, right?

Right. I mean, it's not simple. Right. It's not simple. Let's just be friends.

Well, you're a leader of a place like Lebanon. And the entire place is wife of six-terrain violence. There's not much you can do. The entire place is right with what? Sikterrain violence.

Sikterrain violence. Sikterrain violence. Sikterrain violence. Sikterrain. Okay.

Sikterrain violence. S-C-T-A-R-I-A-N. And Sikterrain violence is physical, conflict, and harm between different religious or political groups within a community or nation. There's a lot of that in Lebanon.

Yeah, because you have a lot of different religious groups in Lebanon. Okay. You have the Christians, you have the Muslims. And then they're also broken up like different groups. And they're also like these tribal loyalties throughout the Middle East.

So if you're a leader of Lebanon or Iraq or any place in the Middle East, you're dealing with a very volatile political situation. And do you really want to deal with these people, or would you rather use your position to ensure that your children have a better future, right, to help out your relative, to help out your friends?

“And that's why they go into these political positions.”

And that's a main way that the Muslims are able to exert influence over the Middle East because they can help these leaders send their money and the children to a safe place in Europe or the United States. And that is just being friendly. Yeah, that human survival, too.

Exactly. Where you want to survive, you want to be well enough to take care of yourselves. That's right.

So it's not always like a level of blackmail that's violence.

It's sometimes it's a level of assistance. That's right. I'm just helping you out. We're helping each other out, right? Right.

I help out your children, then you help me kill people who are doing nasty things, like Espelah. Right? Espelah because they're terrorists, so we're just like, what do you jump this back? Yeah.

You mentioned the the straight of four moves a few minutes ago. Yes. Why is that place so important? Yeah. So that could play because you hear it all the time.

“Can you explain it kind of in basic terms and why it's so important?”

Right. Okay. The issue of who moves is the lynch pin of the Middle East economy because if we just look at this globe, there's some countries that are with in.

The person golf, right, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Emirates, basically Dubai.

No, it's important because there's only one way for them to transport their oil. Okay. Got it. Right. Okay.

Do you see how? There's only one passage way. It's like a one-way street. Got it. Right.

So they're going to take their oil and then transport it to East Asia. And then what they get in return is water and food because it's a desert.

Got it. They don't have their own water. Okay. Okay.

So that is crucial to a survival.

If that were it to be eliminated, like suddenly close off, then UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Iran, all these places would be dead in the water. Recently Trump had spoken up.

“I think it was even just the other day where he said that Iran will be hit very hard.”

He's always like we're going to hit him in the fucking head nuts or whatever we're going to fucking hit him in the, you know, the mittens they wear on their head. He's always doing so. But it's like he said they're going to be hit very hard. If this trade of her moves doesn't open very soon.

How is Iran controlling that effectively right now for themselves, right? And how successful are they being with their management of the strait of her moves right now? Yes. Okay.

So to answer this question, I have to explain a concept to you called the escalation ladder. Okay. Okay. So what is escalation ladder? It's a very simple idea, which is in a fight.

Emotions. Great momentum. Okay. So for example, let's just say you and I, we have a fight. I told you, you think it sucks.

I get pissed off. I'm going to punch you. Right. So, so what then you punch me back? And I, I'm like, okay, then I take a little knife and I stab you, maybe a little knife

and then you stab me.

“I think like gun, I shoot you, take a little gun, then you shoot me, that, that you got”

a bazooka and I hit you. Okay. Okay. So we can see how it's a ladder and how emotions create momentum. But there's a logic to the escalation.

Okay. So, understanding the escalation ladder now, I'll explain to you how the war in Iran has been escalating. Okay. And how it should continue escalate if the war continues.

So this is, so this is an escalation ladder you're showing involving, involving Iran in the straight-of-war moves. Yeah. So this is the United States and this is Iran, okay. Okay.

So, we start the war. When the United States, using something called a decapitation strategy, meaning that if, what the United States believes that if I take out your leader, now you're a leader less and therefore you must surrender to me.

So in the first day, February 28th, they killed the alitone, the coming day, the Supreme

Leader of Iran. The ayatala coming in. Yeah. That's right. And they killed also a lot of the senior leadership and this is what we call a decapitation

strike. And the assumption is that if you have the leader, then Iran would break out into civil war and they would surrender to you.

“And this is exactly what happened in Venezuela a few months back, right?”

So this is what we call a decapitation strike when they got maduro. So that's right. Yeah, that's right. And he doesn't deal with six and nine, which is crazy. Okay.

Yes. But it didn't happen here. But it didn't happen here, okay. So that's the first strike. Okay.

So they tried it in Iran. They tried to decapitation strategy. Yes. But it didn't break out in civil war. That's right.

That's right. So now what the Iran does is it strikes back by closing off the shoot of Humus, right? But that's because they made a new ayatala who took over. Who was that? The Sun.

The Sun. Right. That's right. So they replaced the ayatala to come in with the ayatala to come in a. Okay.

Yeah.

And then what Iran did, the first thing that was close of sort of moves, they

started to attack America's allies in the Middle East, including Qatar, Dubai, Iran, Kuwait. America did? No. Iran did.

Okay. So take me back a step. Okay. All right. So the United States does a decapitation strike.

Got it. Iran punches back, how by putting pressure on America's allies, right? The attack Israel, the attack Dubai, the attack Qatar. The reason why they did that was the theory that these places give a lot of money to the United States.

They invest a lot in the U.S. economy, so therefore they have a lot of leverage over the United States. They have attacked, they would pressure Trump to end the war. Okay. And so once Iran did that, then that forces the United States to basically have a ceasefire.

Because if the war continues, then what would happen is the entire world would lose at least 20% of the global oil supply. And this could possibly create economic collapse. So you're saying America had to take a break then and rethink about what's going on. Yeah.

Because the first strategy didn't work, got it. And the United States didn't have a second strategy. And the straight-of-war moves is closed at this point. They closed it. So the show who moves is, at this point, in the latter.

Okay. So for this entire process, there's been a lot on and off. So sometimes it's open, sometimes it's closed. Okay. So now what the American response is now to put more pressure on Iran by trying to

So how the United States does that is Iran ships 90% of its oil to China, right? So what America did was impose a naval blockade in the Arabian Sea to prevent Chinese tankers from reaching Iran and preventing Iranian tankers from reaching China. So they wanted to stop the flow of oil from Iran to China. That's right.

“And that's how China gets most of its oil.”

Well, well, that's China gets its oil from a diverse, from many different countries. But Iran will export 90% of its oil to China. And the theory is that if you stop that trade, then Iran cannot pay its soldiers, then the soldiers would rebel, got to come and would collapse, okay.

So that's the second step.

Okay. I tried to establish an strike, didn't work, so now I was trying to strangle your economy. Got it. And that doesn't work either, right? And so what happens now is that why didn't that work?

Because the Iranians have been undersections for the past 30 years. So they are used to being poor, right? So in Los Angeles, if we made gas $10 a day, there would be riots. But in Iran, you take away half the calories. Well, they're used to being poor.

So they're used to living with a government that's like manipulating them and taking advantage of them. That's right. So therefore, the Iranians are much more able to be a pain than the American. And so the American now under Trump is under a lot more pressure and this war than the

Iranians. Understood. Okay.

So that's the second step.

So now you move to a third step, which is you destroy the state's capacity to deliver basic services, which means water, food, and electricity. So when Trump says I will destroy the civilization, what he's really saying is I will destroy

“their power plants, right, because energy is a source of civilization, right?”

So the next step that we can expect, which has not happened yet, but there are signs that it will happen is the United States will target its missiles at Iranian power plants and deny electricity to the local population. And the theory is that if you do that, the people will not be able to bear the pain and they will revolt exactly.

Wow. Yeah. So that's man. Cool. That's a lot going on.

And you believe that that's where we could be headed there? We are very much heading in that direction. So now what the Iranian student response is, they activate their proxies, okay? Why? Because the proxies are now able to exert a lot more pain on the global economy, right?

So the Iranian's are able to close off the show from moves, and the proxies who are this, say they're proxies. That's Bala in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and then you have the militias, the Shia militias in Iraq, right? So the logic of this is, by closing off the Shia militias, Iran is denying the world

20% of the global supply of oil. But now the Houthis are able to close off the back out, but not straight, then that's another 7%. So that's putting more pressure on the global economy. And now if Lebanon is able to close off the Shia's canal or put pressure on trade over

here, that's even more pressure, right? That's a lot. Yeah.

“But as we can see, this escalation now, it's coming up really fast, right?”

And the real fear is that the Americans will be under so much pressure that they use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. And then we could be looking at nuclear war and civilizational collapse. And that's what we're three for sure. No, it's an sterilization for sure.

Yeah. Professor, John, what are we going to do? Do we win God? Yeah. We're good then.

That's a good point. Yeah. All right. Yeah. I'll see you on the other side.

Yeah. See you in the big age. Dude, I heard that if you go to heaven, this is something I heard that's kind of

cool, just to take a break from the war stuff for a second.

If you go to heaven, and thank you for explaining this, and thank you for discussing the escalation ladder with us. Yes. If you go to heaven, that when you get there, your friends are there, right? All your friends that you knew from here and your family, but they all like work in different

places. So, you might go to like a jersey, mics, and heaven, and your brother or your ex-girlfriend could be working there. And once you lock eyes with each other, you have memories of like things that you knew from this period here, but it's brand new there.

So it's like, you get to go everywhere and find your old friends and stuff.

could be a park ranger, or Xi Jinping or something could be, he could be working at an ice

cream stand, you know? Yeah. So it could be kind of cool anyway. Yeah, that's pretty cool. Yeah.

So just letting you in on a little bit of BTS heaven lore, it would be impractical for America to end up in a nuclear war, though. Yeah, I don't even what happened. Okay. So you don't think that will happen.

I don't even what happened.

“So what stops that escalation ladder from going forward?”

Yeah. Okay. So again, we want to use Game Theory and step back, NASA selves why this war is happening. Okay. Because once you figure out what the motivations or the players are, then you can figure

out how far this goes, right?

Because the players are trying to win and they're going to try to win in a way that it's

at least harmful or the easiest way to win if that makes sense. Yeah, it does because it's kind of like poker, so say if I got an okay hand, I might bluff a little in the beginning or go in on a few blinds or something, but I'm not going to probably raise it to the end of the line because I know what I have. Right.

I'm going to wait for another hand. Right. So let's really game theory and ask ourselves, who are the major players in this game and what do they want? Okay.

Okay. So you have the United States, of course, you have Iran, you have Israel and I would say the fourth major country Saudi Arabia. Okay. And why are we even in this conflict?

That's right. So, we're trying to figure this out. Because that's been a big question in America, especially amongst a lot of my peers. Why are we there? Why are we putting our troops there?

It doesn't seem like we have a real interest. I know there's the rumors of weapons of mass destruction again. Yeah.

“There's rumors of nuclear weapons held by Iran, but I think people, a lot of people feel”

like we've fallen for that trap before in Iraq and in Kuwait. And that it could just be the same sort of fools here and again. Yeah. Exactly. So it's a great question.

Why did America attack Iran after the failures of Afghanistan and Iraq? Well, and also Trump, our president, said that we would not go to war with Iran. That's right. That's right. So what do you think is happening?

Yeah. So I want to refer you to something called a clean, wake memo. Okay. Clean, break, memo? Yes.

In this, if we're going to understand what's going on, the clean, wake memo, maybe you could put your position to bring it up, the clean, wake, memo written in 1986, okay? Okay. And so let me give you some background. So Bill Clinton is an office and Bill Clinton is obsessed with peace in the Middle East.

This is a rhyme. It's probably. Yeah. And this really is half decided that now it's a good time for a two-state solution.

And the reason why is that throughout its history, Israel was always in conflict with

the other Arab nations around it because of a passing in the issue. Right. And the idea is that if Israel is to have security, it needs to resolve the passing in the issue. It needs to give the pass in its own state.

And then once that happens, then the Arab nations can resume diplomatic relations with

“Israel, they can trade peacefully and then Middle East will be prosperous and peaceful, right?”

But you first have to resolve the passing in the issue because a lot of the Palestinians were Muslim, right? That's right. And a lot of the surrounding areas are all Muslim. Around Israel, also Muslim.

That's right. So there's some pathetic towards the, they're kind, Muslims, right? So for example, Saudi Arabia, the world finally said that as long as the passing in the issue is not resolved, we will never have peace with Israel, okay? So this is what we call the hostile peace process.

Yeah. That's right. That's right. And the majority of the Israeli population was in favor of this. And the major leader who is spearheaded in this movement in Israel is exact Reben.

What's the name? Is that Reben? I'll spot for you, okay? Is that Isaac? Is that Reben?

Is that Reben? Yes, okay? Is that Reben? Yes, okay? Is that Reben?

And he was determined to have eternal peace with the passing in. So he's all this issue once and for all, like given them a state, okay? So he and Clinton were aligned with figuring this out. That's right. That's right.

And they also had aircraft to help them out as well. And the Arab nations, as I should say, Saudi Arabia, were very supportive all of this process. But there's one person who was opposed to the peace process. And his name is Benjamin Netanyahu.

And he assembled a team of people, many Americans, who they're up a new policy for him, called the Clean Break Memo. Okay?

What it says is "screw peace" because our neighbors are Arabs and they only understand power. So you want peace, you don't negotiate, you don't compromise. You hit them hard, you keep on hitting them hard until they respect you, okay? So there are three major pillars to this strategy called the Clean Break.

The first is, go out the passing's hard.

Don't give them a land, don't compromise them, teach them to respect you, okay? Show power. Make them afraid of you. Okay? That's number one.

“Number two is, you have to rejuvenate the Israeli economy by adopting neoliberalism.”

Forget socialism, let's go with capitalism, because at this time socialism was very popular in Israel. And the third thing is to establish, bounce a power in the Middle East, and the way you do that is you destroy regimes that could potentially threaten you. This includes Syria, and this includes Iraq.

And so the strategy calls for working with Turkey and Jordan to destabilize Syria.

And it calls for, for regime change in Iraq, okay, it's called the Clean Break Memo.

Okay, a clean break, a new strategy for securing the realm, commonly known as a clean break report is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group. Led by Richard Perl for Benjamin Netanyahu, then Prime Minister of Israel, the report explained a new approach to solving Israel's security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on Western values, which that means I guess more like a capitalistic, that's right.

That's right. It has since been criticized for advocating a policy of removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. That's right. And the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting its possession

of weapons of mass destruction. Certain parts of the policies set forth in the paper were rejected by Netanyanyahu.

Whoever the report was ultimately adopted and serves as a foundation for modern day is

really global affairs. Is that true?

“Well, well, well, yeah, so, so, so really important for us to appreciate is the study group.”

There are two major participants in the study group, Richard Perl and also Douglas Fave, okay. Okay, God. Right. And this is important because these two are Americans and a few years later, they

will work for the Pentagon and Douglas Fave and Richard Perl work with Paul Wolfitz. And these three will be the architects of the Iraq War. Paul Wolfitz? Yes. Okay.

So you're saying two of the people that came up with the Clean Break memo. Yes. Then went on to work for the Pentagon. Yes. And the architects of the Iraq War.

Okay, so they were architects of the Iraq War. Here we go, Douglas J. Faith and American Lawyer served as Secretary of Defense for policy. Faith has been described as an architect of the Iraq War. And the lead up to the war he played a key role in promoting the false claim that the Saddam Hussein regime had an operational relationship with Al Qaeda, a Pentagon inspector general report

found that Faith's office had developed produced and then disseminated alternative intelligent assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship, which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the consensus of the intelligence community to senior decision-makers. The other thing about Douglas Five is he has been supposed to start it for a long time of being an Israeli asset.

But despite that, he was still able to climb the hierarchy, which is very weird. Because the FBI and the CIA determined 1970s that he could possibly be an Israeli asset. Well, so that's interesting that he would be that they thought that and then he was still able to climb the rank. Very interesting.

Yeah. Yeah. Not only him, but Richard Pearl was also suspected of being an Israeli asset. Richard Norman Pearl is an American political adviser who served as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Global Strategic Affairs under Ronald Reagan, Pearl was an architect of the Iraq War.

Yeah. He claimed that Saddam Hussein regime possessed weapons of mass destruction. Okay. So we need to understand what the clean-back memory really is and what it really is is a blueprint for the greater Israel project.

And the greater Israel project is a belief among certain Zionists that the entire Middle East belongs to Israel. And just to be clear, this isn't Jewish people.

“This is we're talking about the Israeli government and extremist views, right?”

That's right. Julia Jewish person Zionist is someone who believes in supremacy of Israel.

So as Zionist is someone who believes in supremacy of Israel, look it up, Nekka.

Because I hear the term we might have talked about it before. We've probably talked about it before, but I don't know if you've ever looked it up. Zionism is an ethnic and cultural nationalist movement that, originally, 19th century Europe to establish and supported Jewish homeland. What does ethnic cultural nationalist mean?

Can you click on that? If ethnic nationalism is a form of nationalism in which the nation and national era

“to find in terms of ethnicity, what does that mean?”

ethnic cultural nationalism. What it really means is there are certain people, Zionists who believe that God promised this land to the Jews and only the Jews, and therefore only the Jews should be in this land. Therefore the Palestinians have no right to be there.

Therefore our two-state solution goes against the will of God. Got it. That's what really means. Okay. Wow.

But what about people who just believe that Jewish people deserve to have their own place

as well? Is that Zionism? So there are different forms of Zionism. And what I'm referring to in extreme forms of Zionism that has taken hold over Israel. Okay.

In 1990s, everyone, the majority of people were supportive of a two-state solution. They want to piece with the Arabs. In 1990s, is that true? Let's bring that up. Let me see.

“In the 1990s, the Israeli public was deeply divided rather than in full agreement regarding”

a two-state solution while the signing of the Aso Accords in 93 generated strong initial hope and fluctuating majority support for the peace process at various points. Substantial portions of the population, including right-wing political factions. In the settler movement, oppose partitioning the land. So there was some support for it.

Okay. Okay. So you have this extreme. So you have an extreme group. Yeah.

The settler, basically. Okay. So the group you're talking about is an extreme group that wanted that supporting this clean break. That's right.

Right. That was that wanted a greater Israel. That's right. That's an extreme group. That's right.

And we're led by Nanyahu. During '96 to implement the greater Israel project. Okay. So in power for the past 20 years. And if you look at what's been happening in the Middle East, right.

The Iraq War. And then after that, the invasion and regime change in Libya in Syria. And now this attack against Iran. It is consistent with the clean break memo. Got it.

And what is amazing is that this transcends politics.

Both the Democrats and Republicans are participating in the implementation of the clean break memo.

“You mean American Democrats and American Republicans?”

That's right. That's right. So it was George W. Bush, which launched the war against Iraq. But it was Obama, Obama, who supported regime change in Syria and in Libya. Which was also part of the clean, clean break memo.

What I want to do now is show you a video. This is the point of watching this video together. The video is General Wesley Clark and he's talking to Amy Goodman and this is after the 9/11. And so 9/11 was trying to prevent for Americans.

And the assumption was that the U.S. military would seek vengeance against a Taliban and al-Qaeda by attacking Afghanistan. What Wesley Clark says is, "No, no, no." And like only going after Afghanistan, we're going after seven countries. And let's listen to what he says.

And so this is, but how do we know this is in the, is this a theory or is this a fact? That's what I'm wondering. Oh, it's all facts. The clean break memo is a fact. And Wesley Clark saying this, I mean, Goodman, I mean, it's on YouTube.

Okay. And this is U.S. Army General Wesley Clark, right? That's right. He's retired now. He's talking to Amy Goodman about what happens after 9/11. Okay.

About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon. And I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say I'll load some of the people on the joint staff who used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk

to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September.

I said, "We're going to war with Iraq, why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information, collect, connecting, sit on to Al Qaeda?"

He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we

do you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan, I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He said, "He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper."

And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs." I mean, the Secretary of Defense office today, and he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and in Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Finishing off Iran." I said, "Is it classified?"

He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "I said, "Well, don't show it to me." So you're saying that this is part of the clean-breakment. That's right. That's right."

Because how else can you explain what's going on?

Again, this is, General Wesley Clark has access to confidential pending information.

He's saying that right after 9/11, they've already decided to go to war against the entire Middle East.

“If Finishing off Iran, and did we end up doing those things right there?”

Yes, we did. Well, not me. Not us. Yeah. Yeah, no, not us.

Yeah, I wouldn't involve. I'm chill. Yeah. Yeah. I definitely, yeah.

I mean, I've issues with my neighbors sometimes because they're dog or whatever. Wasn't me, man. Yeah, yeah. But we've done those things that they said in that video, and that we attack, have we gone to war with those places?

Yeah. What was the places he listed? So Syria, right? That's done. Libya?

Iraq. Was it some all you want of them? Yeah. Iraq, Syria, Libya. Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

So Iran is going to last on the list. Is this its final boss? Final boss. That's right. Wow.

Yeah. Final boss. Oh, that's the Mike Tyson right there. Yeah. So why, why do you feel like, so you feel like America's working at the behest

of the Israeli government of Netanyahu's choices?

“Well, like, what do you think that relationship is there?”

Well, it seems. Yeah. If this is true, then it would say that that America's working at the behest of Netanyahu and some of these other people who this is what they want, right? Or is this what we want?

Yeah. So again, there's a pattern here, right? So I'm not trying to get judgment. All I'm trying to do is point out a pattern that's emerging. For 96, they read the clean-wake memo encouraging Netanyahu to choose a path of war and dominance

in the Middle East and to clean-wake away from the Oslo peace process. And that's exactly what he's been doing for the past 20 years. Okay. Then these people, specifically Richard Pearl and then his five, they go for the Pentagon and they implement a lot of the clean-big memo policies by starting a war against Iraq

for no particular reason. And then for no particular reason, when happens to the Americans attack Libya, Sarah, these stabilized the regime, caused millions of refugees to flow into Europe. And now we have this war in Iran and we don't even know why Trump attacked Iran.

And you point this out, like he never, he's missing for a long time that he would not

do so. Yeah. So what's going on here, like if the United States was not doing this at the Behead's of Israel, then how do we explain what's going on? Right.

Now, what I'll do now is you're just game-thured, explain why Israel would want this. Right? Because so this will be hard for Americans understand, for Americans understand. But like Western Clark says, we need to remove seven nations in five years and they're doing that, right?

Iran is the final boss. And the idea is to resign this, want to achieve the greater Israel project. And the idea of the greater Israel project is that Israel will dominate the Middle East. And only if Israel does that, will choose have security in the Middle East. Okay.

“Now, weren't they secure before, like I don't understand why they weren't secure?”

Right. That's secure because the Palestinians were involved against them. Their Palestinians felt that they were being oppressed, that their land were stolen from them. And so they were engaging in terrorist activities against the Israelis, including bus bombings,

including airplane hijackings. But why wouldn't Israel just figure that out instead of go this other big route? It seems like, you know what I'm saying? It seems like if it's me figuring out something with a neighbor as opposed to battling the whole town, I would seem like more in my behest, like a wiser, choice to just figure

Right.

Because you have a brother who's kind of crazy.

And your brother believes that this house is not their house, it's our house, which are stolen by this other family. And so we have a right to go, take it back from them. Okay. And there's something you can do about your previous work.

And you can say, yeah, who's the crazy brother?

“Basically, I got it, and these are, we call the settlers, right?”

Okay. And these are people who go against Israeli National Law and go and forcefully evict Palestinians from their homes. You know, this is against Israeli National Law. Yeah.

There was a lot of cases of that. You can see them on YouTube to people getting a victim from their homes for no reason. People taking people's land, a lot of heartbreaking stuff out there. Okay.

So now you're showing me what are you this year looking at here?

So, so let's just take what we know and draw things to the larger conclusion. This is game theory. This is game theory. Okay. Okay.

If you believe that this land was given to you by God and Cessos, Cessos, and Bible. And you believe that it is, Israel's destiny don't make them Middle East. Your real enemy is not Iran, right? Who's your real enemy? The United States of America.

Oh, the United States. Right. The United States provides security guarantees to many Arab nations, Saudi Arabia's protected by the United States. And Saudi Arabia is part of the Greater Israel project.

Egypt is protected by the United States.

Israel, Egypt is also part of the Greater Israel project, right? So what you need to do is remove both Iran and the United States from the equation.

“And the best way to do that is to have them go to war against each other, right?”

And then Israel is the last nation standing and then they achieve the Greater Israel project. But this is game theory, by the way. This is game theory. Yeah. But how would you, like, how would America, I mean, our country is way over here.

And I know that's like, I know that doesn't mean everything that we have this geographical space, but how would we, like, how would we be defeated in it? Well, we would be like the United States would be defeated. If this war becomes so unpopular at home that the people will be vaulted, and that's forces the American military to retreat back to American borders.

Okay. So then we would lose that war, but we wouldn't lose our country, though. No way. Yeah. I mean, the United States wouldn't lose our country, but they would lose the empire.

Yeah. Oh, so we would, we would completely remove our self from the Middle East. You're saying remove our self from all of our allies, and then Israel would have the ability to control them. That's right.

“But why doesn't Israel just go control them and not even involve us?”

Because, um, Saudi Arabia, um, and the other nations at Middle East have a lot of money, and they invest hundreds of dollars in the U.S. economy, because they exchange for your protection. Got it. Yeah.

Wow. You know, one thing that has scared me, and I've heard people, a lot of people talk about it was like a lot of like the technology and stuff that they, that that was used in Palestine, like doing a lot of the genocide over there. It's like drones being used to kill people, being used to kill children.

We had a doctor on who was talking about children getting shot just right down through their bodies. You know, like in a way that was like, it seemed very logical that drones were the ones that were doing it. All the reporters being killed there so that nobody could transfer any real information

out of the, out of the world over there. One of those things, especially with the technology, and then you start to see the surveillance stuff happening in America, it starts to make you think, well, why wouldn't that, why wouldn't it come here? Like if, you know, like that's certainly a fear that I hear a lot is that, um, that we're

going to become in this surveillance state, and then the same thing could happen to us over here, if we're out of line with, who, with, um, if Israel were to gain control of America, and then we're out of line with something that they see or some behavior, something, um, or they want to move people here off of their land. You know, it's, that, that's something that's very scary.

Yeah. So good at Gaza. I think Gaza, um, is the pilot for surveillance state. You think it's pilot for what for surveillance state? Yeah.

That's a testing ground for, for seven states, because like the theory is that once Israel chiefs to go to Israel project, it now needs to, um, control this in our area. And there are that many Jews, uh, so it needs surveillance technology in order to control the local population. What, what I think will happen, and this is going to shock a lot of people is right

now, Israel is very close with India, and India, the population is booming, and there's like young people, and if you let, if you just let them stay in India, they're going

But so what if Israel and India were to get together and says, hey, let's bring in millions

of Indians to work now in the Middle East, because war has to short the population on the Middle East, and now you can use surveillance technology to control these Indians. And these, the Indian people are used to a caste system anyway. So the idea that the Jews at the very top, right? And the Indians are working class, like they're like doing a labor, and it's all being controlled

by surveillance technology, well, you would achieve the gradual project. Wow.

“And do you think that's what's going on?”

I think that's the direction we're moving towards. We're not they will succeed, I can't really say, but I think that's the plan. The people, surely the people of Israel don't want to see all that, like, like, they don't want to see so many people get killed in that sort of stuff happen. You think they want to?

I think Israel may be heading towards a civil war between two places. You have Tel Aviv, which is the gayest city in the world, very liberal, very cosmopolitan. You mean, gay is like, people being gay, like, I mean, like, real gay. Like, man, that hug each other, like yeah, and when we can hug each other too. Oh, yeah, okay.

I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know if you're using it, like, hi, but that is sexual, so yeah. Okay, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sorry.

Yeah, it's regular gay. I didn't know if we were talking about different, you know, different brands of gay. So I didn't know it was. Yeah, yeah, like, yeah, like, like, gay. Yeah, yeah, and they have Jerusalem, which is very conservative, very religious.

So these are two competing visions of Israel. And unfortunately, the people in Jerusalem are the ones with a power, and they are extreme in their religious vision. Okay. So, well, I know they have an election coming up over there.

That's right.

“And so that's, I just feel like, is that going to determine a lot?”

Because, like, I mean, I feel bad for a lot of my Jewish friends here who do not want to be associated, like, you know, it's heartbreaking to them, you know, my friend Michael's always talking me. It's like, you know, to make sure to like, to let, like, just because Israel doesn't mean Jewish people.

It doesn't mean like, it's like, it's the government. That's right. So I want to use religion to show you how extreme these people are, okay.

So the Holocaust was a traumatic event, and six million Jews died.

Let me ask you this question. Okay. Why did the Holocaust happen? The Holocaust happened, I guess, because of the ideology that was created by Hitler in his regime.

Yeah, it was Hitler's fault, right? Okay. So the extremists Jews are called capillists, okay, the cabala. And they have an extreme vision of how the universe works. And the deep dark secret that they have about the Holocaust is the Jews deserved it, okay.

So let me explain why. If you read the Bible, the Bible, the Old Testament, basically, it's fundamentally about the relationship between God and the His showship of people, the Jews, and problems arise when the Jews turn away from God. So for example, when Moses was leading the people from exile in Egypt to the promised land,

the people chose to worship in idol.

And the first commandment is do not worship false idols.

So God had punished them by making them one to the desert for 40 years, okay. And this is a consistent theme throughout the Old Testament, where Jews suffer because they turn away from God. So the most dramatic event in the Bible is the destruction of the first temple, where the Babylonians come in and destroy the first temple.

Now if you read the Bible, the book is Jeremiah, what Jeremiah the prophet says is, the Babylonians are not the enemy of God. They are the tool of God to punish the Israelites for turning away from God, okay.

“So if you just extend the logic, then logic is this, why did the Holocaust happen?”

Not because of Hitler, but because the Jews turn away from God. And so there's groups that believe that. That's right, so at this point in history, there's 1900 when Zionism comes into being. Most Jews think Zionism is retarded. I'm a Jewish person living in Germany, living in the United States, living in England.

I've assimilated into society. I'm a professor, I'm a doctor, I'm doing well for myself, I'm secular, I have lots of friends who are Christians, I'm what a secular mean. It's not religious, okay, right, so it's like, why would I go to a desert called Palestine? It's something called history, it's called Palestine, where there's already people living

at this point in history, like the years 1900, I support the idea of Zionism, okay, right? So the Holocaust had to happen in order to force the Jews to hold the covenant with God. Because the Jews were created as God chosen people, they were in light of nations. They were meant to show two-faving God and therefore be virtuous and be the moral guidance for the world.

Okay, so they were chosen to be an example of God. They're chosen to be the light of nations, they're chosen to be the best representatives of humanity. Okay, so you're saying that some like devout Jewish people or religious or extreme, this and extreme group, believed that the Holocaust was supposed to happen because the people

“in the Bible had turned away from God, right, is that what you're saying?”

So yes or no, you're saying. So let me clarify what they believe the mission of the Jewish people is, okay, the mission of the Jewish people is to return to Israel, create the greater Israel project, which

is the Promised Land and then build the third temple, which will be the house of God, okay?

So the purpose of history is to force a reunion between the Jewish people and God. And once that happens, then the world will end and we will be in paradise forever. So there must be three things must happen for this world to end, okay? The first thing that must happen is the greater Israel project has to be achieved and therefore we have these wars in the Middle East.

But why would that have to be achieved if that was something that was just developed 30 years ago? Because accordingly, people, the original covenant between the Jewish people and God is that God promised them the land, stretching from the now in Egypt to your freddies in Iraq. Okay.

As the covenant, okay? And the Jewish people, once they receive this land, they must be loyal to God. So for God to return, first of all, His promise must be kept, okay? So the first thing is the greater Israel project must be achieved. Something that must happen is all Jewish people must return to Israel and repent.

“Meaning if you don't believe in God, you have to live in God.”

If you're Jewish. Meaning if you're homosexual, if you're Jewish, better tighten it up. You better, you better learn how to like, you know, better figure it out. Yeah, you, you know, staying. Yeah.

That's gonna be a long day. Yeah. Yeah. Start liking this, man. So that's a third, there's something.

And a third thing is the third temple must be built because that's where God will live. Okay. Got it.

But the problem is the site of the third temple is now where the Alexek Moskis.

Now, Alexek Moskis is the third holy site in the Muslim world. So if they destroyed the Alexek Mosk in order to build a third temple, this would trigger a, with this warp between Jews and the Muslims. Oh, wow. Yeah.

So these are three things that must happen according to the eschatology. Okay. So, but you're not saying that's gonna happen. You're saying that that, if you look at that, that's according to what? Is that according to?

That's according to the eschatology, which is what they believe how the world ends and how we achieve heaven on earth. But who believes that? Like my Jewish friends, I don't think believe that. That's right.

That's right. What's right? They do believe it. They don't believe this. Okay.

This theory. Okay. One of this told you, the vast majority of Jewish people who are religious think this is heresy. Okay.

This is madness. It's insane. Okay.

The problem is that this ideology is promoted by secret societies around the world.

Okay. And secret societies control the world.

“And that's why we're seeing a lot of things happen, because how else can you explain why”

the United States is attacking Iran for no particular reason? I mean, it's definitely, look, I think a lot of people believe it. It's at the behest of Israel. There's some involvement there. But I think, yeah, but after that, it's like, yeah, you kind of don't know why a lot

of it's just like questions. And you don't get a lot of information, sometimes like, you know, you'll ask political figures stuff. Why are we so embedded here and a lot of them don't have an answer? And so I think that's the part that seems kind of alarming.

And I think that's also the part when you don't get a lot of clear information. That's when a lot of like conspiracy theories, different ideas, uncertainties, ideas like

You're not, and you're not getting information from people who should know.

“So I think it's like, I do understand how people can start to, I, yeah, it makes perfect”

sense how people can start to believe things and how people can start to look into things, because there's no place to get real news anymore. There's no place to get the information. Yeah, and you know, a lot of things that are happening right now, just to find human logic. So everyone's looking at Donald Trump's like, the war is lost already.

Just make peace with Iran, just get out of there. And what Trump is doing is doing, he's doing taco, like one day he's like, we're going to anger civilization, and the other day he's like, let's make peace guys. Let's just be friends. And the next day he's like, no, I'm going to nuke you now.

And next day he's like, oh, you know what, I didn't really mean that. It's just weird. Yeah. It feels bizarre. And it feels pointless, but it matches with everything feels bizarre right now.

And like, the way that Trump is behaving right now, goes against his character, because in the 80s and 90s, he was a real estate developer who's a business person, right?

“He understood, like, if you do business, you need to have credibility.”

You can't flip flop because like everyone will be scared of you. I agree. That's actually a really good point. I mean, even when he was running for office, it seemed like every other thing. It seemed like he knows exactly what he's talking about.

It seems like he knows exactly where he stands. So it's just really weird situation where how the United States is behaving in the Middle East, it goes against American interests. And the way that Trump is behaving, it goes against his character.

He's never behaved like this before.

You mentioned a little bit ago about secret societies, right? Yes. Can you take me into some of that and how, and you said that you believe that that's some of what is controlling some of this? It seems like it's rule the world, okay?

So let me explain why that's a case, okay? So the power in the world is what we call transnational capital, right? And trust on the capital, all what means is money that is able to move freely around the world and that's where it wants and extract profit from these places. And so transnational capital would include pension funds.

It would include sovereign wealth funds. It would include private capital, such as like stage trade, vanguard, Wall Street Sea of London. China has a huge sovereign wealth fund. That's right.

So trust on capital is a huge entity and they say money makes the world go around, okay? So trust on control the world and so money controls the world, basically. Got it.

But the problem is that trust on the capital is a game and it's a game, it's a game, right?

Because you're trying to maximize your profit, you're trying to beat others in a stock market. And in any game, there's a certain way to win, right? And the answer, and so like how do you win every single game? Like when we're going to work game, you play, what's the secret to winning every game? Get to the end.

The answer is you cheat, okay? If you play by the rules, if you work hard and you play fear, you're a sucker, okay? To win the game, you have to cheat. And the best way to cheat is to sickly conspire with others to rig the game in your favor.

“And that's what we have secret societies, right?”

Because to win the game of capital, you need three things. First of all, you need access to secret information. You need to know more things than other people know. Second thing you need is infiltration. You need your people to go in the government in order to create policies that favor you.

The third thing is you need coordination, conspiracy between these different groups in order to create an outcome that you want, right? So an example is a Rothschild family. And the Rothschild family became one of the most powerful banking firms in the world, because they had a secret network of agents scattered throughout Europe. So in 1815, Napoleon faced the Battle of Waterloo.

And obviously he loses. And the Rothschild has an agent who witnessed the battle, then he sends this information to back to England on a Corvette, which is a fast ship. Then what happens is rumors spread that the English lost the war. And now this tremendous fear, that wasn't true.

It was not true that they they won, but the first rumor, the agent got there in spread of rumor. Well, we don't know, okay, but but their rumors that they lost the war, which could have panic. And the Rothschild were able to make a lot of money doing that, okay? And that's like this is very common.

And so this shows you an example of how information is crucial,

And so the Corvette got their the fast ship got there and new in advance.

The Rothschild's new in advance. The Rothschild's new in advance. The war that the battle had been won. And three days later, official news came to the British public. Tell them that the battle had been won.

But during these three days, there's mass panic, because rumors are spreading that the battle has been lost. I see. So the Rothschild was able to capitalize on that panic financially. That's right. And so that's when people started realizing, oh, we can do this.

“Right. Right. And so think about the world that we live in today, right?”

Where if you're, if you have like one minute of confidence information, you're able to make millions, billions, right? So the question is, like, how do you access this information? Well, you do so for transnational networks. And throughout history, there've been three major transnational networks in Europe.

The first is the free maisens, the second are the Jesuits, the third are the Jewish diaspora. And at some point, they figured out, why don't we just work together? Oh, and what they call themselves? The Illumannati. Damn. Yeah. I heard about it.

Now, black friends are always talking about them, man. Yeah.

The Illumannati. Dang. They got us. The Illumannati is a name given to several groups, both real and fictitious. Historic of the name, you see, refers to the Bavarian Illumannati. An Enlightenment, Eris secret society founded on May 1, 1776 in the electorate of Bavaria. The Illumannati, along with free maisenery and other secret societies,

were outlawed through edict by Charles Theodore. In the subsequent use, Illumannati has been used when referring to various organizations alleged to be a continuation of the original Illumannati. These organizations have often been accused of conspiring to control world affairs by mastermind, ding events, and planting agents in governments and corporations in order to gain political power

influence and establish a new world order. Done, done, done, done.

“I mean, I think that if you if tries not to control the world, you need to decide”

to win the game. Got it. So in addition to there being countries, there's these different countries. There are above countries. But there are above countries. Wow. And so that'll have members of different countries that are part of that part of that. So think of Jeffrey Upsen, right? So everyone's thought that Jeffrey Upsen was a Mossad agent. He was above Mossad. Dang. Yeah. Do you believe that Jeffrey Upsen is still alive?

I don't he's alive. Yeah, because do you think he died in the jail cell? Yes, yes, yes, because he's he's expendable. What is the basic code do you think of the Illumannati? Do you think they have a code? That's a great question, okay? So when do you have these two societies? We've both remember like secret societies are just a natural outcome of the game of China's

North Africa capital. So you have like many, many different secret societies in in place.

And so which societies have the most have the greatest advantage? And the answer is

those who practice eschatology have the greatest advantage. Eschatology? Right. Eschatology is the belief in that God will end the world at some point.

“Okay. And so why are you so why is it that eschatological secret societies are superior to”

other secret societies? And the reason why is they're able to channel the religious energy of millions of people. So look at so why we're having this war in the Middle East. It's not just civil societies. It's also the fact that you have tens of millions of Christian Zionists, Christian Evangelicals who support Israel. Right. So if you're an investor, there are three ways to make the most money. The first is war. Second is revolution. And the third is religion.

So this is if you say studies for the eschatology, oh supporting war, revolution and religion. Because if you're a millionaire, when you invest your money and start market, if you're a trillionaire, you'll invest your money in war, revolution and religion. Wow. But don't you think that it's sometimes it's kind of a doubt like is it like if you think of it all like that, right? It doesn't feel pretty dark. It is dark. But once you actually study

the eschatology, once you study the religion, it actually gives you hope. Because what motivates these people, is that greed? It's not power. It's faith. It's their accelerationness. They believe that God has divine plan. And what I'm doing is helping God accelerate this plan. Wow.

they have a strong enough faith that they believe that what they're doing is helping to accelerate it.

That's right. Oh my gosh. I don't even know what to think anymore. And that's why things are happening so fast. It does. Yeah. The physical needs are happening so fast.

“That's what it's like. What is happening so fast? Yeah. So how does this end?”

I mean, that's kind of dark. But maybe we just leave it to be continue. Yeah. But well, I pray that that doesn't happen because we don't know that that's, we don't know that's going to happen, right? They put their faith in God. We should put our faith in God. Amen. Yeah, that's from our faith is. Yep. In Jesus name, man. Amen, brother. We just have to keep our faith

where we can and we can, we can control, we can control. And it's always, if that's the case and it's

always been part of something. Yes. You know, and it's like, well, all we can do is do what we can and try our best by our own compass, right? That's right. Amen. Amen. Jesus. Believe in Jesus. Yeah. Amen. You are fewer Chinese. Yes. Thank you. Yes. Okay. Sorry. It's just making sure I didn't know. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know for sure if you are not. What's, what's some people,

“as anybody ever said, they tell you are a plant that you, they tell you. Yeah. Yeah. What do you get?”

Okay. So, now and then, could you be a good Chinese asset? Yeah. Yeah. Well, there are people who believe on the end of the crisis. No. There are people who believe that in my Chinese classroom with my

white board and my, my, my white board is magical. So, I can actually like direct the course of human

events with my, with my white board. I'm just there and I'm just like, I want more and I want, you know, and I'm like, I'm not the end of crisis. Okay. I swear to you, I'm not the end of crisis. Okay. I'm not going to be a Chinese spy, but I'm not the end of the crisis. Okay. Speaking of that, what is speaking of China? What is China's relationship right now? Where do they play a role? 'Cause you didn't factor them into this at all. China, China looks at what's happening and they're like,

what the fuck is going on? What the hell are you guys doing? That's, that's China. Do you think that they're hyper worried? Do they have a lot of like, um, do they have a lot of intelligence assets that are over here working and that are working in the Middle East? What do you think is going on? I'm sure. 'Cause they obviously, they're a world power. They're going to have, they're going to be concerned and involved. Yeah. So the problem with China is that Chinese are

non-religious. So it's almost impossible for Chinese to appreciate what's happening in the Middle East. But they're capitalists, though. They're, they're capitalists, and they want this what and as soon as possible. Because they want people to trade with each other. Chinese don't go to war. They, they trade. Um, and so everyone's trying to just completely confuse. But historically, China, they've been, they've, there's been war in China. Well, this war,

within China, but China doesn't really go out and invade other countries. Um, the way that, you know, the United States does. So what is America's current relationship with China? Do you feel like I've, I've had friends recently say that they think the safest place to move in the

“world right now is China. Mm-hmm. Yeah. I think, I think that what's happening is a”

domino effect where the war in the Middle East powers out of control and it engulfs everyone. So like a war war three. Yeah. And it's like total war. And what would the size be? It would be completely chaos. Um, so the idea is that the war, the world will break out into into regional wars. So imagine in Europe, NATO is fighting Russia in Ukraine. Right? And there's a possibility that Russia may take over the Baltic countries, Latvia,

Lothania, Estonia, and maybe an attack pollin. Okay? So imagine, all of Europe is out in flames. You move over to the Middle East and everyone's at each other's throat, right? You move over to East Asia. What the most likely scenario is that China is in conflict with Japan and North Korea is in conflict with South Korea. The real danger in East Asia is that China is actually North Korea because North Koreans have absolutely nothing to lose. They're kind of crazy and they're

brave. So North Koreans have been setting soldiers to fight in Ukraine and they fight to the death. Is that true? Yeah, 10,000 North Korean troops in it. 10,000 North Korean troops in Ukraine, right? Yeah, in Ukraine, that's right. And they fight to the death. And the reason why is they're captured, they're family members back in North Korea? Get killed. Yeah, no way. Welcome to the dictatorship.

In addition to sending troops in weaponry, Pyongyang is now said to have deployed a

missile unit to Western Russia. Wow. By the end of 2024, Ukraine, the United States and the South Korea estimated that around 10,000 to 12,000 North Korean soldiers have been sent to Russia. And that's just 2024. That's right. So they're trying to reach them to 30,000. Wow. Yeah. Unbelievable. I've heard you talk about the Grand Bargain. Yes. With China, and that's between American and China. That's right. Tell me a little more about that.

Right. So there are two nations that currently benefit the most from the current global economic order. They are the United States and China. The United States is obviously because they control the US dollar. But China as well, because China was able to live millions out of poverty because of global trade. Right. So both are heavily invested in maintaining the current global

order. And so the idea of a Grand Bargain is that they resolve the Taiwan issue where basically China

and Taiwan signed an agreement where they reconcile politically. And the United States withdraws from East Asia and allows China to maybe dominate East Asia. Okay. Understood. So that's something that China would want. Probably just a little bit more assurance that they don't have to deal with America over there. That's right. But but also like for China, Taiwan is a huge political issue because you know, there's something called a center of humiliation where China

was caught from in the 19th century by多少 powers. And having Taiwan back in the full of the model land would be a tremendous political achievement because it would mean the reunification of the model land, the completion of the model land. And that's something that China would pay a huge price for. And right now, the United States needs China to buy more US treasuries. So that's the idea of the Grand Bargain. Got it. What do you think is going on with America right now? Do you

feel like we're still the world's economic superpower? It's an empire in decline. It's like I'm just walking the streets of Los Angeles. And it really seems that America is on the

“brink of a civil war. And really you think that? Yeah. How would that happen though? Yeah, I think”

that the midterms will be a major test of the cohesion of this country. And what I think

may happen is Trump may go for a third term. No way. How can he do it? Can't you only go for two

terms? So according to the constitution, there's something called a 22nd amendment, which says that a US president may not sit for more than two terms. But there's loophole. Loophole is imagine 28. Don Jr. is at the top of the ticket. And Donald Trump is the vice president. They win. And then, uh, Don Jr. He resigns. And then Donald Trump is not the president again. No way. And you think that you think that's going to happen? I think there's a strong possibly this could

happen. But also there's the war powers act where America's at war. And so they just turned

“the constitution, which is what happened in Ukraine. That's why Ukraine could not have an election.”

Right, because there are war. And it could have an election, would they still let you say, let's get you to think? Probably not. Got it. Yeah. There's a lot of, there's a lot of darkness out there. Yeah. What are some positives that you see? What are things? What's a positive way that you see out of some of this? And please have an answer for me, Professor. Yeah, family. Love. God. I mean, that's why we're here. We're here to experience things that we couldn't experience anywhere else,

because we're eternal souls. Like once you appreciate that, this is only the thing that we're experiencing here. It's only a journey and a eternity of experiences. And that we're here to experience things that are unique to this world. And one thing that's unique to this world is family,

“like having children. So and love and love, exactly. How can somebody exactly?”

Yeah, doing your best. Yeah, being supportive, sharing. So if you just focus on what's happening to you're politically, you're going insane. You're literally going insane. Are you insane yet? I have a family. All right. So I have a wife who loves me. So I want to tell you the story of how my wife and I met. And then you can appreciate how much we love each other. Okay. So we met each other about 10 years ago. And I'm about 40. And this is like the darkest moment

And I felt that life was hopeless. And I literally believed that my wife was an angel sent by God

“to redeem me, to save me, to show me that love is possible. So that one day, I could be sitting”

across from you telling the world that love is possible. And if we just move towards love,

then we will redeem the world. But so I made this my wife randomly. And we go on a first date.

And where do you meet her at? I met her randomly at an event. And it was like love at first sight. And I asked for a number. I called her out. And if you ask for it, God will give it to you. And I was asking for someone who could be my wife. I wanted to start a family. And so we go on on this date. And I took a someplace really nice and Beijing. We go to Japanese restaurant, I orders Sakey. And it's a lovely date. Now, the custom in China is that on the first date, if you really like

someone, the woman will get serious suddenly. I mean, you can be laughing for out. But suddenly, the woman will get really serious. Look at you dead in the eye and ask you, how much money do you

make? What's the size of your bank account? Really, that's a serious, that's a real thing that happens.

“Yeah, because it states you, like, they'll ask you what yours, your dick size is, right?”

Yeah. So what, what more advanced civilization? So we ask, like, how much money do you have? I've got to go. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. And like, I'm really afraid we reached this point, right? So this date is going fantastic. You worked with two hours and we're just laughing, we're connecting with some particle. And then my, my date, my future wife gets serious. Looks at me dead in the eye. And I'm freaking out. I'm trembling. I'm nervous because like,

'cause you're on the job. I don't fucking job, man. Yeah. And so she looks at me in the eye and she asked me, so are you gay? Oh. And I, and I, and I, I felt such relief. I knew she's the one, man. She gets me. Yeah. Right. Yeah. Yeah. She doesn't care. I'm forward. She just cares if I'm gay. Yes. I can work with that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But, but it's like these moments that make this world so wonderful and so blessed. So was she just focused on, on,

on woman's like, like, like this? Yeah. Yeah. Moments where people are asking if you're gay or not. Yeah. It's better than asking, you know, your, your thick size or, you know, your bank account. Oh, yeah. For sure. I think, yeah. It is better than asking it with how much money you make. Yeah. I'm so happy that you've, that you found that you got somebody. Yeah. Because you were 40, you didn't think you were going to have someone. That's right. I, I, I, I, I thought that I, I was,

on my life, I, I was a drift. I thought life was pointless. What were you doing? Were you living at home? No. I was like literally living from, um, uh, place to place with my suitcase. I had no place to live. Uh, I was unemployed. Don't they give you a job in China? Like tell me a little bit more. What is it like in China? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, so I went to China to work as an education

“reformer. So I, I believe, like the best way to build a good future. But you, you grew up there.”

No. No. So, so my background is, um, I was born in China. But I want to six. I moved over to Canada. And, and that's where I grew up. Then I went to Yale University. Thank you. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then, um, I went back to China to help we form the school system. I love Canada, man. We did you live in Winnipeg? No. I lived in Toronto. Oh, thank you. Yeah. I'm hoping my friend Diego Pavia goes up there and plays for Canada. Yeah. Um, like, you know, Canada's really cool.

But, you know, we're, we're a bit slow. We have five years of high school rather than four. Yeah. So, so, you know, our IQ is a bit lower than than than than the Americans. But you guys have great posture up there. Can't, Canada has some of the best posture in the whole world. I've noticed. That's something that I've noticed. Um, okay. So you end up back over there in China. Um, but yeah, is it like, do you hear a lot of stories that like, people can only have one child? Like, what

are some of the policies that are true over there that we hear about? Well, you know, the one child policy was, uh, true for a long time. But then, um, Chinese were aging and there were none of children to support the elderly. So they, um, and then the birth rate was declining. And so they put one of the policies, um, to encourage more fertility. And now you can have as many children

as you want. Nice. But, but, I mean, the reality is like, most young people do not want to have

children. It's a situation, I mean, it's a similar situation throughout the world. Like, you know, in states, young Americans don't have children. Europeans are the same the same way. Right now, the fertility rate in East Asia, uh, in North, in South Korea, I think it's 0.6, uh, in China's

Nations publisher, what chart is this? Nick, can you tell me? Yeah, it's, uh, I think this is a world

fertility rate. In 1963, it was 5.3 births per woman and now it's 2.2 births per woman. Oh, that's wild. And China has 1.0, 1 birth per woman. Yeah. And boy, who has that big, go to the top and hit the tops? Shed, uh, Congo. They have 6 births per women, Niagara, uh, Mozambique, 5 births per woman. So my wife has a 7-course roommate. There's 8 in her dorm. And, uh, we have 3 kids. Oh, you guys have 3 kids. We have 3 kids. And met your one son, Christopher, he's here today. That's

right. That's right. Yes. And, um, so, she, uh, during the 30s, which is a prime age to have, um,

children, and collectively, they have 3 kids. Hmm. Yeah. So it's not happening. No, it's not happening.

Yeah. Um, we've looked at some stuff today that that seems kind of dower, but it's also interesting, you know, um, do you think that peace isn't option and how would we get there? Do you

“feel like, like, what has to adjust? I think that for the longest time, we've trusted our leaders”

to, uh, I agree with you. And we thought they had our best interest. That's right. That's right. And in fact, there's control by secret societies and there are crazy people who want to achieve their eschatology. And it's time for us to wake up. And if we collectively wake up, then we will

achieve peace in this world. But waking up is a hard process. Yes. As you know, right, it's a very hard

process. It means going against social conventions. It means defying all that you've been taught. It means losing a lot of France and family in the process. Have you suffered from, uh, even speaking out about certain things? And, like, have you, like had any issues, like come your way? Have you ever feared for your safety? Have you had people that have spoken up against you? Or,

“like, what's that, what's that been like for you? Yeah. So, um, one thing that I think a lot about”

is what the consequences for telling the truth, for speaking up, for drawing attention to societies. And here's my logic. I think that these people get you where they are because they are, uh, they really do believe in God. But the God they believe in may not be the God that we believe in, right? But they really do believe in God. And they really believe that what they're doing is doing God's will and they're accelerating events that were, uh, predestined by God

since the beginning of time. And so I present a paradox to them because I seem to know their plans, right? And so, um, if I don't get their plans cracked, then I'm an idiot. And they can say, "Normy." But if I'm able to articulate their plans, then how am I able to know all this? Because I'm not part of this to societies. I don't know any of these people. But at the same time, I know how they think. And I know, uh, what their plan is. So, they can't resolve this paradox.

So, the, those they can do is ignore me. I'm kind of dissonance. Does that make sense? Right. If they were to come for you, then it would prove that there's something true about their

“plan. Is that what you're saying? No, if they, so in their mindset, if the only way I could know their”

plan is if God told me their plan. But they think that they're doing God's work. So, how to explain the fact that God's telling them what to do. But also God's telling me to tell the world that their plans back. But what the plans are. So, they're like, well, we don't know how to resolve this. So, let's, let's ignore this guy. Yeah. Hmm. Do you, uh, sorry, sorry, sorry, one more point is the idea of, um, um, so there's a theory out there that, um, a lot of these

societies, they reveal to you what their plan is. And the reason why is, um, let's just say they screw up and they won't the world. And we're all go to heaven. And then God asks, hey, so what happened? How did you blow up the earth? Um, well, most of us will be like, we didn't know what was going on. Right. Right. So, they get all the blame. But let's just say they tell us their entire plan. Oh, right. Then it's all of our fault. Then it's our fault. We're complicit in our own destruction.

to decipher their plans. I'm telling them to tell them the world what's happening. But the

things are just like, that's cool of us because now, if everyone knows what's happening, and they do nothing, and it's complicit. Ah. And so, yeah, we've all come become very complicit with things being okay. Yeah. Is it the same in China? Yes. Yes. Exactly. It's kind of heartbreaking sometimes. It's like, I don't know what happened. I don't know if there's been like this a slow sedation. Yeah. I can't tell what a cur-- what has occurred. I can't tell if, you know, I don't know.

It all just feels like we've lost some of our-- the great truth is that we're all spiritual beings. That we are first and foremost spiritual beings. That's true. But materialism has corrupted us. We should be focused on our spiritual will-being, on our consciousness, on elevating ourselves, on being generous, on being open, on being spiritual. And now we live in a world where money's everything. So we just pursue materialism. Right. We're so, yeah, you're so focused,

you're whole life, and it's all built towards this. You got to go to school to get a great to get a college, to get a job, to get a thing, and then get it from a-- That's right.

And to get a house. There's everything. It's like the next carrot. It's always something.

We are in the matrix. Yeah. And we have to wake up. Wow. Dang. We are in the matrix. Hello. We're in here. We won out, whoever's seeing us. We won out. Help. We're in an interesting spot. It feels like with--

“was that certain accelerated? Did that have anything to do with how time has been adjusted?”

Do you think, or no, do you see anything with that? I don't know much about it either. One thing I wanted to ask you before you leave, financially, you've talked about about the transnational capital. Capital. Yeah. What would you do with money or assets right now? Like,

what do you feel like the future that could look like? Have you thought about that much?

Yeah. So I think that the world is heading towards financial collapse. And it's pretty clear with the AI bubble, right? Where they're building these data centers. And it's really uncertain how they will make money out of these data centers. And it's really seem to be able, it's in a burst. And it really seems that the United States is heading towards financial collapse. And so I think that, you know, trying to figure out where to put your money, it's a dead end.

“You have to think about how do I lift my consciousness so that I'm ready to help myself as”

well as others at the time of crisis. Okay. Right. So what can I create right now? What could I start to have around me? Or what knowledge could I start to have? Yes. Because if the grid goes down, something you're just back to your own knowledge. That's right. And do it a lot of us if we had to go back to our own knowledge, bro? Yeah. She would be bunk. Yeah, what we're dead. Yeah. So but it will be exciting. Yeah. But I do think you're right. It's like, what skills would you have?

What can you apply? How could you help someone? What could you offer? Yeah. And in a weird way, man, I feel like it's almost what we could use the most. Is that scary to say that? Look, I think that what you do, telling jokes, is exactly what we'll need in a time of crisis. We need in a time of darkness to see the light. And laughing is the best way to see it to see the light. Yeah. Yeah, man. Telling the stories, being a part of joy, sitting around people laughing,

“that's my favorite thing. That's right. Yes. Sometimes I got lost, I think, on this like,”

what was important, you know, the past few years. It's been fun. I've been having a good time, but some of it's just been like, yeah, I don't know. You get focused and you kind of lose yourself, but you, you feel a little disconnected from yourself, you know? Yeah. So, you know, I work in school before and what my theory is that a school should be centered around laughter, because if kids come into class laughing, yeah, they learn the best. They're engaged, they're excited.

So there was a science experiment many years ago called a scientific experiment. Yeah, yeah, called laugh club, okay? Okay. And so this Indian doctor, all I did was bring in people together and a park and just laugh together. And laughing is infectious, right? So if someone's laughing, other people are laughing. Yeah. And he just asked people to pretend to laugh. Like, what's magical is like, when you start to pretend to laugh, another people are bringing

in laugh club every morning, the kids would go to school and pay more attention in class. Wow.

The adults, we go to work and have less stress. And the elderly would be much more resilient against disease. They recovered from disease faster. Yes, it's called laugh club. The laughing club of India usually refers to mirror nars short documentary about Mumbai's early laughter club movement, not a single exclusive organization that film follows groups who meet often in parks to stretching, clapping breathing exercises and deliberate group laughter as a social and stress relief

practice. The movement was begun in Mumbai in 1995 by physician Dr. Madhan Katarya. It's earliest meetings used jokes, but participants quickly shifted to laughter exercises

“when the jokes ran out. This is a movement you should start in the United States.”

Hey, man, bro. Yeah. We need some things. We need to feel inspired. And I don't mean, I don't

even mean you, whoever's listening. I mean me. I mean, yeah, there's just, I don't know. I'm glad we're talking about it today. I do feel like there isn't a awakening in some ways. And I do feel like we have been stuck in this matrix. I've heard you talk before you leave and thank you so much for your time today. No, it was great. Fantastic. Really good. Thank you. You know, I came with purpose, which is to tell the joke about my wife and like the gay joke and I've done that,

so I'm, I'm good. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I've heard a lot of what we consume nowadays is very, there's huge filters on it. It's like the information that we get, what's allowed to come through. You know, I think we saw that after like the, a lot of information came out about

“Gaza. It's like now I don't see many videos about it anymore. Yeah. I think a lot of it just, you know,”

there's a lot of strongholds on who has, who is letting information through to us. That's right. Ah, how do you, I've heard you talk about a propaganda test before. What's a propaganda test that you use to know if something is propaganda or not? Yeah. So, I think what's really important is for people to make predictions. Because whenever we see something, we're, we're making certain assumptions about the world. And so the way, for us to know if the way we're in the

world is correct or not, is by extending the logic and making predictions about how the world should turn out. And if it doesn't turn out, the way that we predicted, then we should just reflect on how we think and make changes to ourselves. And I think like the greatest problem in the world that we have today is gay keeping. There's too much gay keeping media. No, there's too much gay keeping in academics. So for example, I'm not really a professor, right? I'm not a professor. I'm a high school

teacher. Okay. I don't know if you're not a college professor, you know, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, don't have a PhD, you're not a specialist. You're not, you don't get, get,

“get me called professor. Okay. Right. So this is just what's gay keeping going on. Yeah. I think that”

what's one way to improve our society is if experts are forced make predictions. Because now we know how good their knowledge set is, right? And now it's democratic. Now it's not just like your Harvard PhD. And therefore you know what you're doing. No, no, it's like you, you, so you're work. Yeah, exactly. Show you work. Bro, I like that. Yeah. Let's be democratic. Yeah. A basketball player. It's like, you don't just believe he's good if he tells you. That's right. Or you believe he's good

because he went to a lot of basketball camps. He's got to go do it. Look, look at COVID, right? I mean, during COVID, there were, well, at least vaccines. Oh, dude, Anthony Fauci's a f**k it. Dude, there's a look. Look, look, look. And he was like, how dare you question a science? We know better than you. We, we have your best interest in the heart. Just obey us. Trust the science, bro. Yeah. And that's it. And it's like, okay, fine, show me the science because. Yeah. Show me.

I know. It's the matrix, man. Yeah. I'm glad we got to meet at least here in the matrix. Yeah. Yeah. Well, well, everything happens for a purpose. Yeah. You know, and like, you know, I really respect what you do. You bring true to the world through, through laughter. That's a really

most powerful way of communicating. Well, thank you, uh, professors, young. Um, I appreciate it.

Yeah. I just appreciate that like, it's just interesting. I think one thing that is great about social media and stuff and uh, and technology is just the different, um, people that you can, uh, bear witness to, you know, and different people that can get their voice out there. And I think it's great that you've developed a voice for yourself. Um, what do you, what do your students think about it? What are they? What do they think about it in China? Um, so are you more popular here than in China? I'm way more

you're brave? You put yourself out there? Is that a thing that doesn't happen very much in China?

“Where people kind of look like, yeah. Um, so I think that a lot of things I say are dark. Oh, yeah. And”

so they uh, would rather be ignorant. Oh, I say ignorance is bliss. Yeah. It is, man. I used to be so

ignorant. And I was fucking doing great. Yeah. Absolutely. That was doing great, dude. Yeah. But

you know, once you achieve full knowledge, you'll do it in better. Oh, I'll never get there. But

yeah, a little bit out of time, man. It's always about the journey. Yeah. It's always about the journey.

“Yeah. And yeah, connecting with the people that you love, that's what God put us here for. That's why we're here.”

That's right. Family. We're here to have experiences that mean something. Yes. Yeah. Um, Professor Zhang, thank you so much for your time today. Uh, travel. Say, how do you say goodbye in Chinese?

“It's I, Dan. It's I, Dan. Yes. Okay. It's I, Dan. It's I, Dan. It's I, Dan. It's I, Dan. Yeah. Now I'm just feeling on the”

breeze, and I feel I'm falling like these leaves. I must be cornerstone. Oh, but when I reach that ground, I'll share this piece of my mouth. I can feel it in my bones. But it's going to take you.