Instantaneous Acceleration - Military-Filmed UFO Footage

And so we did, we shared with you kind of, you know, some really interesting footage that we were certain was interesting.

I mean this sincerely, and I don't mean to be hyperbolic, but the footage Jeremy that you sent to me to review is on its face. Simply on its face, the most extraordinary footage I've ever seen. And I've spent a lot of time looking at infrared videos and done a lot of geometrical analysis of these videos. Those five six observables, you know, there's, there's one that just, it's in your face in this footage. It's Mosian along and whatever speed it is, we get a lock on it, oh boy, we got a lock on it and it realizes, oh you got a lock on me, they're following this dude, see ya.

This is weaponized. I'm George Napp here in sunny post-winter already feels like we're on the edge of summer Las Vegas, joined by my friend and colleague Jeremy Corbyl, man, Jeremy, it was one tough winter here, a long tough winter we just had. brutally cold. I mean, it got down into the 40s sometimes, mostly in the 60s though, and gosh, I'm so glad that's over with. I didn't have to use my motorized snowplow at all.

The entire East Coast is belly aching. There's some, you know, once in every 10 year snowstorm and, you know, friends are saying they're digging out their cars. I don't know if they're exaggerating, but they're telling me it's pretty gnarly on the East Coast with snow. Yeah, my regrets go out to them. I miss winter.

I mean, I'd like to see at least some kind of winter here in Las Vegas, but we basically didn't have one at all and now the sun is shining. We go out and bag race today. I wanted to mention something, I do want to wish I have to birthday to Mr. Fornames himself, Jeremy Corbyl.

“I think in honor of your birthday, Jeremy, we should probably award you another name.”

I mean, you could be Mr. Five name, and I name nominate the name Duke, because I've always liked that name.

I had an uncle named Duke, and I hereby be pleased to you, or maybe you can just think about it for a day or two, Duke, Mr. Five names. I know birthday. All the nicknames I've ever had had been like shithead and stuff like that. Duke, I'll take it. That's a great one. So last week on this program, we uncorked a new UAP video, designated UAP by the Department of War and its analysts, not by us. It was video acquired from official Department of War, vaults and collections, and although we, I've been mostly off of social media for the past week or so.

I was pretty sure that people would be happy about this video. Glad to see some new footage never before released images that would be embraced by UAP world, which is always what happens. You know, so how that play out? I mean, no one could possibly say that that objects in those, those video that video were birds or balloons. Could they?

Right. I mean, we predicted that, you know, and it's a, it's a difficult balance and dance. You know, it's, it's very hard to get new data for people to look at at all. That is a heroic feat. If new data gets out to the public and not just by us. I mean, that's, it's a heroic feat in general.

“So I'm really grateful to be able to see these things and, and, you know, I think, and you think the public needs to see them too, as far as our reporting goes.”

But we do know that there's going to be easy dismissals of things. Look, we told people that the actual reality that this is part of an analysis of UAP, that's designated UAP even the term orb in documentation, triangle formation, UAP. You know, so obviously, and clearly people have been studying the footage. You put it out and the easy things that you say is, well, you know, looks like a bird.

Looks like a balloon, you know, here's another example. Okay, fine. But those are people filming birds and balloons. And typically, when you're looking through that data and that sensor system, you'd hope to have more data.

And that's always the key is that if you don't have enough data inside of a piece of footage,

then people can dismiss things and try to say, nothing to see here move on. And you don't really have a rebuttal because you know, and, and we're reporting correctly, the information, but, you know, you can't disprove the disprovers. So it really comes down to the best fidelity is going to be when there's a lot of numbers on the screen. There's a lot of data where you can see range and speed and, and all that.

“I think ultimately, George, you and I, when we've been exposed to stuff and, and if we can obtain and release,”

then the point is, we'd love to show the observable. We all talk about the observables with UAP and, you know, there's five or six observables,

these hard physical machines, the way that they propel and traverse.

“So that's really the, the kind of the golden ring, as they say, is if you can have a piece of footage,”

the truly shows one of the observables we've all heard about in UFO land. You know, I laugh at some of the comments that have been sent to me by other people as like, they can't get over the fact that these sensor systems way up in the sky do not have iMac's movie quality cameras attach them that they are, that the images that are recorded by sensor systems, classified sensor systems are not suitable for showing in a movie theater. They're picked up on thermal sensors, things like that.

So they're not really cinematic in the presentation. And to those who think it's easy, and that there's got to be better video, go get it. Let's not yourself out. If it's so easy, go ahead and go get it. If it really exists out there, we try really hard to get the best images we can.

We spent a lot of time vetting them and we present them and people can take them or leave them, whatever they want. Well, let me correct you once again.

Try that, you know, that's, we've never solicited anything.

People know that we're trustworthy. I saw some comments online like this big conspiracy like, oh, they released something again, like, you know, some mystery like we're part of some conspiracy, some grand conspiracy where we get this footage and then we put it out and we must be seeding the population with some lie. You know, I take on bridge to that and I rarely do because we never asked for this.

“We never solicited people trust us and that's what it comes down to.”

You know, I've talked to numerous people that have come forward to you. I mean, why did you choose, you know, us, why did you, there's a ton of people you could go to. Why did you choose us because I trust you, I trust you to not handle this poorly. I trust you to not twist anything and, and I really, I'm grateful that people do. So I just wanted to kind of say that was a response that I saw is it was part of some grand conspiracy.

No, it's like really hard work and just allowing people to know their safe to trust you. And then if it is something that is acceptable to put out and there's, there's times that it's not.

And a lot of the stuff, most of the stuff I'd say that comes our way, we never use it, never.

Right. So I do want to get somebody to weigh in somebody who knows what they're talking about in analyzing videos like that. And what else we might be sharing today and in future episodes. And he's big kind of a good friend of ours, somebody we trust to take a fair look at at these videos that come our way one way or another. Because name is Merrick Munrenning Camp, he was a, he's a contributor to the Hill, an opinion writer for the Hill.

But before that, he was an analyst for the Department of State's Bureau of International Security. He was a presidential appointee to the Department of Defense, now called the Department of War. And he really has helped us understand what is and is not in videos like this. Merrick, welcome back to weaponized. George Jeremy, thanks so much for having me.

I'm really, really excited to be here to talk about this new footage that we are about to be releasing. We're saying, wait, wait, are we releasing your move the secret that's blue the secret? Okay, let's do that. So Merrick, there is in a new footage and you know, we've showed you somebody just want to tell our audience, you know, George and I go through this extensive process and when we get to the, to kind of towards the end of that process, I mean, you can attest to it, Merrick, I'm, we're really careful.

Sometimes we have things that we think are really good, but we don't have the technical knowledge and you've actually helped us assess things that we're like, okay, the juices at worth the squeeze were not sure on that one. So we're not going to put that out. So you've really been helpful to us on weaponized with just some of the technical stuff that we are not capable of doing.

“You're kind of the last step for us sometimes is, you know, is this going to increase value into the conversation about true UAP?”

And so we did, we shared with you, kind of, you know, some really interesting footage that we were certain was interesting. And I think you concur, but I would like you to educate people, professor, you know, I'd like you to educate people about kind of what we're seeing before we look at the video, so we can really understand what's going on. Unless you want to tell me a little bit about what's going on in your personal life right now, because I'd like to know that too. We can put, put pause on that for for maybe for a future discussion, but I will, I'll preface this in all seriousness and I've spent quite a bit of time looking at these videos.

Very easily and the the armchair debunkers have hidden behind very convoluted explanations or frankly have not offered any explanations at all for some of these videos, which I think.

“You know, is, is a decade of of the truly anomalous nature of what we're seeing in some of these videos, but I am, I mean this sincerely and I don't mean to be hyperbolic, but.”

The footage Jeremy that you sent to me to review is on its face, simply on its face the most extraordinary footage I've ever seen. And I've spent a lot of time looking at infrared videos and done a lot of geometrical analysis of these videos. So I will, I'll preface the discussion by saying, and you alluded to it, Jeremy, but those those those those five six observables.

You know, there's, there's one that just it's in your face in this footage and a preliminary analysis, which we'll get into, but on my end and I'm just giving folks the bottom line up front here.

The preliminary analysis does not suggest that it's an artifact of some kind of weird camera movement and that first observable is instantaneous acceleration and it sure to, you know, to again at a very first kind of run preliminary analysis does appear to be what we see in this footage.

“Secondarily, we see an object and again, we'll dive into the details, but we see an object lacking wings flaps control surfaces, a discernible or obvious means or propulsion.”

There's no jet exhaust and it, it makes direction change and that would be that's another observable potentially that's positive lift. That's what we know is as anti-gravity, but that is, that is another observable that appears to be demonstrated and there's potentially a third and that is hypersonic velocity because the, the speed with which this thing appears to zip out a frame is quite extraordinary.

So I'm, I'm preface all of that kind of with with my high level takeaways.

We invite obviously further analysis, but this is this is quite an extraordinary piece of footage and kudos to you guys for, for getting it out. Well, we're, we're going to do it together. Yeah, so we're going to let it fly here now or maybe here, but I wanted to see if Merrick was going to address the last week video as well. Interesting, right, we had those, those three, three objects that were, they're recorded from an mq1 predator drone. This is over the Persian Gulf looks like off the coast of Iran.

“I'm certainly interesting. I think what we really need to do and and our good friend, Mick West is built a 3D simulation to for precisely these kinds of these kinds of cases and videos.”

He seems to say it's a bird. Well, then we, then we say, okay, prove it. You have camera elevation angley of the line of sight, the bearing that the line of sight is you have, that the actual location over the ocean where that, that camera is pointed. So you have a lot of metrics. Okay, let's put, let's put it in. Let's do the, let's do the science. He hasn't done that yet. The day, I think the day before two days before that, that video came out, Mick was on social media saying, Oh, I'm not posting. I'm not active. I'm just bored. I'm paraphrasing because there haven't been any good view of videos. Well, here here are two, Mick.

You know, let's, let's go ahead and let's do the analysis and you know, let's let's have the discussion. Yeah, absolutely. We'll be saw that video at three objects. It looks like a triangle, like maybe it's, it's a fixed structure. And then the, the, the points of light change position relative to each other didn't look like it's a singular object. But, but it's still as far as you're concerned, it's not that strong compared to other things that you've seen. You know, the challenge with most of these videos is that we don't know the range. We don't know how far that object is from the camera. We know how far the the ocean or the ground is. We have a very good sense of what that is, but we don't have the range. And that is the key element that.

That will make or break in a, it'll separate, you know, an interesting video from an extraordinary video unless unless it's something that's plainly obvious or in very much in your face like the video we, we might be watching in a few minutes here. And that, that is the key, but I, you know, look, I encourage a folks to do the geometrical analyses that there is a, there's a lot of data in that, in that video George and the one that was just released. And you know, it's interesting, you know, make, west of the, the, the, the world's most prominent debunker is, is openly admitted that he was paid to develop code to do these 3D simulations to do this kind of, this kind of work and he hasn't, he hasn't put it into his simulator. So look, I,

Yeah, and, and, and that's the point. It's a very difficult dance. We do give as much as we can. So for example, we didn't make up these title names, right. This is designated UAP with in intelligence agencies. These are part of analysis a lot of the time, but yeah, I can't go further than that, but yes, you have to, we have to protect certain elements of information, you know, wish, we didn't have to do that. Best we can do is put it out and, you know, you're, you're calling out one individual, you know, who who does analysis, man, there are so many bright people on the interwebs that can all contribute and really show us their findings.

“So I think, you know, with each video that we've been able to, you know, release to the public, it's another data point. So I kind of look at it, like a bigger picture, like some videos, they just teach the public, like this is not grainy.”

Even Neil the Crasse Tyson said, well, grainy black and white videos, grainy, these are, these are thermal, these are weapons, platforms, and systems. They can see in the dark, there's no grain in it. So it's like, I think even the general public needs to be educated. So every piece helps us understand more. When you saw the gimbal, you saw the tick tack video, that was huge. People were like, oh my gosh, when you see some of these UAP,

getting locked, I mean, target lock, solid lock, you know, you get hopefully more information, and I think that's also what we're going to see today.

“So yeah, look, give us a breakdown, Mark, so that people really appreciate the visual, they're about, because it's long. Now, let me tell you, you know, I created title cards to replicate the exact title cards that would have been there.”

This shows a bunch of sections of footage and then repeats certain elements of footage. Now, I didn't do that. There was part of an internal examination done by our intelligence agencies. So, you know, that's what you're seeing in these chunks, but we're going to play in one piece. And what I'd like to do, just because I find this footage so intriguing, it's in your face, it's compelling to me, at least. I think it's so important that I think it's worthwhile just doing a very, very high level kind of scene set or just a little bit of context and background. So folks can understand what we're actually looking at.

“So what we are looking at is footage from an MQ9 Reaper drone and we're looking at footage from the camera that is right up here and the front.”

And this is a, this is a, this is not precise, it's very general, it's very high level overview, there's enough data in the video that allows us to see where this, this Reaper drone is flying.

It's actually circling in Jordanian airspace and it's looking, the cameras looking almost exactly do north, maybe just a couple degrees to the east, but basically do north at a very remote area in Syria and this, this black line here is the Jordanian Syrian border. Let's see the footage that, that will show shortly, is divided into two clips and there's a bit of a separator there and the drone actually flies about two miles north, northeast in that, in that brief period of time.

We don't have a timestamps, we don't know how long, how long in between that, the two clips, but we do know that the drone is circling.

I can tell and I'll get into this in a second, but it is conducting, if you're looking at the drone from a bird's have you just like this, it's flying in a counterclockwise circle while keeping an eye on on this area in Syria with, it's with this sensor with this infrared sensor. Just to some background, this area of Syria is a suede of province, which has seen a lot of ISIS and jihadist activity, so it's not surprising and I say this intentionally, it's not surprising that we had surveillance assets looking at villages and surveying this area and I'll get that, expand on that in a bit.

Well, here is, I'm cutting to the chase slightly because I'm giving folks a look at the actual, the object, it's the closest I can describe this is, you know, it's something akin to a mushroom perhaps, but I'll just give folks a very, very quick overview of what we see on this display. And this is a very standard M29 display, I want to emphasize that nothing I'm saying here is classified, there's plenty plenty of footage open source available out on the internet, there's videos put out by the military with all of this symbology, there's nothing nothing classified here, the fact that we were at the United States was flying surveillance assets in Syria should not be classified and I say all that for reason which I'll get into in a bit, but up here we see the heading, the aircraft heading.

This is the the azimeth angle, that is the direction that the camera is pointed, so it's pointed 100 degrees to the right, so so think of directly to your right perpendicular to your right is 90 degrees, so it's, it's basically your four o'clock position, the camera's pointed the four o'clock position looking behind into the right of the actual, the nose of the aircraft. This is the aircraft position and altitude, I've did a pretty darn close check and all the numbers check out is flying in a circular kind of an orbit and going to think it came out to about 120 knots, which matches up with a, a reapers kind of cruising, loitering speed.

“But folks, they're interested, they can input these values into Google Earth or Google Maps, and they can see exactly where this object was over time.”

Down here is the the military coordinates is called MGRS, it's basically a specialized, it's basically the military's version of latitude and longitude, it's a very precise, down to a couple feet.

It's kind of the military's own lat-long system, so that tells just where the camera is pointed, where on the ground, what, what position over the earth right, what, what ground position that camera is looking at. And people, there's, if folks are interested, they can go online, their MGRS converters, so you just plug these numbers into the converter and then you can convert to latitude, longitude and map it. We've spent too much time on on these numbers, this is elevation above sea level for that ground location, this is the bearing, so the direction the camera's looking relative to the target, slant range, ground range, field of view height, field of view with.

The element really to to the discussion here, the laser is not firing, the laser will will will designate and also get ranging really precise ranging, but it is to the best of my understanding not firing at this point, so we're not getting, we're not getting a precise range off of this to this object, and this is just like, this is the, the left right kind of metric of where the camera's pointing, the elevation angle shows. Relative to the, the, the camera's nose, how far down, in this case, this eight degrees down below the aircraft's nose, so it's looking, as we can, as you can see from the footage, we're looking down at the ground.

This right here is an indicator of, whether the object is locked, that, that will change over the course of the video.

“This is incredibly important because this tells us we are on black hot, that means objects that are warmer, hotter are going to appear darker, they're going to appear black and objects that are colder.”

And that is very important, cold objects appear lighter, and throughout the, the course of this video, this object intriguingly enough, despite maneuvering and doing this apparent instantaneous acceleration is colder colder than its surroundings, which is interesting aircraft are generally going to be warm. We've seen that, we've seen that before, and that is something that is indicative of UAP is that the proportion itself, it doesn't give the same heat signatures that you'd anticipate. I'm just curious, when you're looking at the, you said like a mushrooms shape, it is like lenticular on the top, and it's got a little bit of a bottom.

Is this, is this, are we seeing, we're seeing the thermosignature, but oftentimes we see the shape to like you would see movies on this, if it was a, a plane or something at this. That's right, and I have, that's an absolute right, you may have a couple examples of that that I can show, maybe after we show the video you're absolutely right. And, and we'll, we'll get into kind of theories of what it could be, maybe after I show the, after we show the clip. This little indicator right here shows where north is, and as I mentioned, the camera's pointed basically due north, so that means that once, if the camera, if this indicator is up at the top here, that means we are indeed looking north, if it were down here, that means we are looking south, it's kind of that simple, it's very intuitive.

And this will be here is the zoom and the, the field of view, which basically is means the lens, and we'll see that the operator cycle through.

“And I believe this is four times digital zoom. So I think this is about as close as we can get, this is zoomed in as far as we can.”

I'll, I'll just very quickly note, there are two minor little oddities that I noted that I don't think are are a major deal, but, but I did notice, and we'll, we'll see, and the, and the, the other footage in the, in the video that there are brackets around the corners of the screen.

I'm not sure what that is, and the other cork that I noticed was the elevation above sea level does not change over the course of the video.

“So that could be a setting that the operators do, but I think, I, I, I braze that because this video, again, on its face is so profound that I think we need to be very, very meticulous about everything about it.”

I think if we're going to come out and say that this shows what we think it does. We need to be very, very, again, very meticulous about every little detail. Well, all I ever say is it's short, they think it is that that was the whole thing. There was a full, you know, examination done and it was there words. This is instantaneous acceleration, UAP, but yes, when people look at it, then, you know, we have to, you know, decide is that correct.

Exactly, but I will say everything else, everything tracks. This is, again, look at plenty of examples online of an MQ9 display, again, nothing classified. It, it's a perfect match with all this data. So I, I, I, very little doubt that this is legit, but I did want to flag all those little caveats. That said, the other, once, once I, I watched the video a few times Jeremy, I, I, I remembered seeing this, this, this, um, Office of Director of National Intelligence source was quoted in a daily mail article from back from October of 2022.

“I believe this is from Josh Boswell, um, and the operator describes quite literally what we are about to see.”

Um, he describes it, you know, an MQ9, so we have the platform, uh, MQ9 Reaper Drone, uh, the, the source describes, uh, the exact scenario that we see in this video,

a town, basically, a, a rural area of Syria, and again, you can check that with the, uh, with the, um, the coordinates.

And then, uh, the source describes what we appear to see in the video, uh, an orb, the operator chases this orb, and then, and, and I'm going to quote here, the, the source says, uh, then it will do something remarkable, like suddenly bolt off the screen. So again, we have platform, location, and observe behavior. So that gives me even more confidence that this is, uh, this is something this video. I, I suspect has, has done the rounds within, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, the intelligence community within within, you know, the military, uh,

and has certainly, uh, potentially garnered some, some, some inquisitive, uh, of folks.

“And, uh, so, uh, I think that's, that's, that's fascinating to have this, this, this description match precisely what, what we appear to see, uh, in, in the video.”

That, that's amazing. You, you found that I had never remembered that.

I'm going to hear it from, you know, people that control reapers and, you know, people that are pilots that they'll see these, you know, sharp angle turns or these incredible, um, speeds that come out of David Fraver talks about that. Just boom, it was there, and then it wasn't, you could just barely see that it moved, you know, but you could tell. So you, we've heard about it a bunch. Now you bring up that article. That's what, that appears we're seeing.

It's actually that, that article. So the, the, the date Jeremy that you had for this, uh, for this incident, I believe, was 2021. That article came out in October of 2022. And here we are, what three, three and a half years later, um, uh, looking at the, the literal quite literally, the, you know, what, what appears to be the video that was described there. You know, there, maybe there are others. And if there are, there's a, there's a lot of, there's a lot of others. Yeah, describing a general thing, but I mean, yeah, down to the point of Syria. So yeah, it could, it could be, I don't know.

Yeah. Well, let's play it. Um, so the, the video we're going to play is, uh, three minutes long. It's almost three minutes long.

And that's because it, it shows these two parts. Um, there's a little flash of black between the, the first two clips.

And you kind of watch it, and you're like, huh, and within our intelligence agencies, they were like, huh. And so you'll see these title cards in between those are not my words is what I'm going to say. Those are not my words. And then you can see the analysis that was done. And so the, you'll get a repeat a few times, okay? Let's play it. The following UAP video has no audio. We recommend our audio listeners to watch the full video version of this episode.

[Music]

[Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music]

[Music] [Music]

“The following UAP video has no audio. We recommend our audio listeners to watch the full video version of this episode.”

[Music]

So here we do see the operator. You can see them in the narrow, the top left. He's in the narrow field of view. He can zoom in further and he, the operator will or in black hot.

This object appears to be moving left. That is almost certainly a parallax. So if you can see at the top, the plane is flying east.

“Something is moving perpendicularly to it so that it's almost certainly parallax. Operator tries to lock it up here and you can see that the operator is attempting to do it manually not working.”

Now we have that break and now this is the second part of the clip and at that box you'll see. That's the operator trying to get a lock and here we have a successful lock on this object and then the operator will do a digital zoom is currently an ultra narrow field of view, which is about zoomed in as you can get without going into the digital zoom.

Now zoomed in and this is as far as you can get. And here we see this odd mushroom shape. What's called a mushroom, no lenticular right there's no no wings, no no exhaust plume.

I still locked on and here it breaks the lock so it appears and then it just zips off.

“So that is that is quite extraordinary on its face. So let's slow it down here. I think we're going to go down to 50% speed.”

And again, we have basically two movements that initial it kind of zips off to the left direction change and then it shoots off.

Yeah, that's wow is is that's all I've been able to say for the last two. It's clearly going away in this first part, but then you think that to the right is an actual movement of the object. I do and I think this is you get down to 25% five percent speed. It becomes quite apparent. I'll run through a couple hypotheses for what what could explain it and then I think we could I think we can rule those out. But we'll we'll let this video finish playing. This was their examination of a shape they were doing kind of sharpening techniques to try to define the shape of the object.

Sometimes it is almost vaguely gimbal like, but yeah, that's pretty remarkable. But the movement is here. Let's watch this last one. Yeah, to highlight you a piece shape their word right right.

I'm venturing in a speculation territory, but but the shape and I'll show you just in a second here. I'll show you kind of what that's actually kind of a great jumping off points.

“Let me let me kind of to answer a question George will look at for example some footage of drones known drones right these are these are we've we've identified these as drones we know they're drones from the footage that they came from.”

So here's our here's our friend. And these are all known drones you'll notice that even in lower from further away and lower fidelity infrared video you can still see the body basically of an aircraft and the wings structure right even here you can see the wings structure and the body of the aircraft clearly visible here.

You know quadcopter of course, you know has a very distinct shape and outline and infrared and it looks absolutely nothing like like this.

No wings no town no rotors no exhaust no plumes of heat exactly and and just to my point about this kind of footage not being classified this is all out there this is actually footage from the exact same sensor platform and mq nine these are all believe it or not. This is and we're looking at as an mq nine taking video of other mq nine's on a runway and you can see we're in white hot WHG the engines in the back are hot and they are believe it or not they're white you see that you see the exhaust right from these F 16's now George to your to your question.

“These look like actually these look like fighter jets these look like drones that most certainly does not look like any kind of conventional aircraft that that I can think of.”

Yeah remember George we put out.

You AP that we had documentation we knew for sure it had been fired on people kind of laughed at me at first when I said we fire upon you AP on a regular basis well it's because I'm getting reports from within commands people reach out to me they tell me when he that's happened. And this one I we ended up obtaining an image of and I was kind of embarrassed to put it out kind of look like kermit the frog but we call it Syria dome UAP because the best way we could describe it was a dome shape and that's kind of what I'm seeing in this image America is you know it appears to be dome shape with you know man it looks like one of those weird ass like.

Was it golf breeze images remember there's was a hard Jeremy guys it is it is truly bizarre night I want to quickly find me because I I want to address I think the the first thought that I had hey man maybe this is the the sensor operator jerk in the camera around and that that this is you know this is because that could that could and we saw that in the the famous tech tech video there's one moment.

“I think that midway through the video where the where the operator changes the field of view basically changes the lens system and it looks like it shoots off.”

And we can actually we can we can investigate that hypothesis and so if you guys don't mind all of kind of. And that was so impressive and then that little thing to the right I was like no way they had to move the camera just being all that thing move way but the idea you're having is that they were examining. The incident is motion not just the incredible shoot away but then that move to the right was the actual instantaneous motion that's what that's what is really I'm struggling to to understand here and it does seem to indicate that that was indeed a very anomalous maneuver and an example again of that.

That instantaneous acceleration observable so I will quickly I'll share let's see if this works here. I do want to investigate this this this theory potentially that this could be the sensor operator rapidly inadvertently moving the camera to the side and I don't think that that's the case because. We actually see the operator once it shoots off to the right or appears to shoot off for the right. The the operator actually does precisely that the operator moves the camera because. The operator wants to want to find this thing and where did it go so we do have an example there it goes off to the right and then here I'm going to go frame by frame the operator.

If we move that camera to the right you can see the whole background everything the entire scene shifts from right to left so this is what we would be seeing if the operator had indeed move that camera and that could have been the right if if folks want to say that that's what explains that instantaneous acceleration.

That the the object moves left to right so has this apparent right word motion at first of all it moves kind of left in it appears to to really make a course change and then it shoots off to the right. What we see that the background actually if we take if we look very very closely the background is actually moving perpendicularly as a result of parallax kind of just the way the plane is moving the background appears to move from from basically downwards from top to bottom and we'll show that here.

So here the object zips off and you can see the background moving downwards, but we can we can do it even even more slowly we'll go frame by frame here there goes the object it shoots off to the right and we're going to stop here and we'll go frame by frame and we'll see the there's the couple features darker features that move straight down even while the object is still visible moving right the background is moving downwards and that to me is a.

“the very strong indicator that that this object did what it appears to do and and as remarkable as it is despite any observable propulsion just zips off and no technology that I know of.”

can can do anything remotely remotely close to that and and people will say okay maybe it's China okay.

If China has this kind of technology we're all screwed I'll just be out be honest with you we're totally screwed you can just drop a new can you are in the world instantaneously. Beyond that what would what would China be doing flying ultra advanced technology over the Syrian desert they have there's absolutely no reason for them to be doing that.

“this is just blowing my mind just you know as like a I understand everything you said and now I am you know I had an idea but I I thought at first just that first moon was so impressive that was the instantaneous motion but the way you're showing.”

the movement keeps going in the same direction as the thing does this instantaneous shot to the right I am convinced more than ever now that that is correct I mean this reminds me.

exactly the kind of favorite talked about you know he can't describe it even it's it's in human it breaks the ideas of physics that something can do that. I don't know if I'm really breaks that appear so I'll just I'll caveat all this it appears to break the lock like he said it does that kind of up and it's like a if you're looking at the video right it's kind of like a counter clockwise movement it appears to maneuver no wings that that that alone is extraordinary that alone is positive lift that is right that's maneuvers without wings control surfaces flaps.

“I don't have a good answer again having looked at the the most obvious and apparent hypothesis that this is a camera movement this is a you know is an error by the operator or field of view change.”

It doesn't matter because either way the background would move with the object if that were the case and we can quite clearly see. I have this is this is truly extraordinary in my opinion and George one one thing that like really stuck out to me just from like a weapons platform you know standpoint and this is a thing I know a little bit about you know I've looked at a lot of these videos over time and I always look at the it's rate G it first says and that's the first thing you see when something is beginning to kind of track it's the systems like starting to compute I think relative motion.

So it's like basically computing relative motion then when the target gets like centered you see that next and stable enough.

The software then displaces thing called point peel i_n_t_ and you see it on on the left and that's you know kind of making the the aim point from how I understand it. But then finally when it has a solid lock on the target to wear a system like it computes that it can fire like a controls the call control solution you know logic hellfire or whatever it needs to do that's when you finally see our point and that's what it says are point on the left displayed on the screen. That mother fucker was rock solid locked by the reapers weapon system when it win it decided to shoot the fuck off.

Yeah, just from my uneducated viewpoint it's mosey and along at whatever speed it is we get a lock on it hope boy we got a lock on it and it realizes oh you got a lock on me here follow this dude see it.

Look the bottom of my is I want I want the release of this video to spur some serious attention like we have the age of disclosure great phenomenal that he did incredibly well right but this this is what we're talking to this is what we want we want this this critical mass to form we want more interest I want this I want this video to blow the minds of every scientist that looks at it right I want them to be superplex that they actually become. interested faceted almost maybe obsessed with this topic because that right there there's no easy explanation for that for that video this may be video evidence and proof of one of the observals for the first time in the public history this could be.

quite extraordinary can I can I had maybe sorry go ahead George yeah I'm just gonna just dumb question do we know how fast that thing is traveling when we first see it and then can you guess about the speed when it.

“I have a hunch I did a very very basic back of the envelope calculation it all depends on range that's the that's the key we don't have the range just like the other video this kind of comes back to that.”

but the the beauty of this video is we don't need the range to know that it's doing something pretty extraordinary right again breaking that lock without wings or propulsion or flaps right and then shooting off. the range is irrelevant at that point when you we need to see something do that and you know look the other the only other thing I could potentially think of which it kind of fails immediately is a balloon balloon wouldn't change direction it could maybe if it's punctured right it could shoot off like an a party but again a balloon is not going to change direction.

and and the only balloons that would look anything like that or latex balloons and for my understanding they don't they wouldn't shoot off they just kind of they kind of shred and they deflate slowly so I'm trying to think of any any possible prosake explanation for this and I I'm still coming up short.

this sets resistance keep a lock on a balloon even if it popped a hole in it I think again you know I I would hope so I don't know these these systems are designed to track ground targets so.

it's not designed to track the fast movements of a fighter jet for example that's not the primary kind of role of these of these camera systems but again that that that that that instantaneous. acceleration departure off to the right is is not something that you know that that I've ever seen any other footage.

“I'll can I just I'll add maybe one more one more item and I think this is this is important but I do want to raise this and that is.”

you guys remember the the ODI and I the office of the director of national intelligence source that was quoted describing basically exactly this video that individual was was quoted further in this article and the individual basically says. you know the pentagon and the intelligence community are they're self congratulatory they're patting themselves on the back because oh she was they solved half of the you know half of the UAP reports that have been been filed and sent to them.

but I'm a quote the source here we don't give a crap about the ones they've resolved.

“yeah there are balloons up there and balloons are sometimes mistaken for UAP but there are shit loads of classified videos that are pretty profound and pretty clear they don't want to talk about this stuff because they really.”

really don't know what the hell they are and that's the truth and I I raise this and I bring this quote up because. again that that source now has more credibility because that source described pretty much exactly what we saw on that video and and this. this is where I my blood kind of begins to boil because there's absolutely no reason for that footage to have been classified there's it's not surprising that we were surveilling rural that part of rural Syria.

you know what I'm going to do for five years ago now it's there's nothing glass here I don't I'm not qualified to know any of that I you know I don't I don't know never ask.

I'm this is my personal opinion there's absolutely no reason for that stuff to be classified again that that symbology is all over in the public domain that is pretty profound footage and there is a there is the public has a right to see that kind of footage and and they've clearly been hiding it. what really makes me sorry to go on a rant here gentlemen but this has been going on for 80 years this is a letter from the chief of intelligence a right pattern and air force base to the air force chief of staff in November of 1948 and he basically says the exact same thing is this source.

that there's profound compelling highly anomalous stuff out there and it is being hidden away and that that really that is unconscionable and again I don't see any reason for this stuff to be classified.

“I think arrow needs to step up and and look if Dr. Koslowski the director of the all-domain anomaly resolution office the pentagon's UAP analysis office he seemed to be fairly open.”

if he's been blocked stone walled then he needs to resign right this is this is outrageous that this kind of footage.

is being withheld from from the public for just just for the sake of analysis but also because it's it's pretty very well be. as profound as it appears to be. so there's no additional information if they were to open this up is there anything else attached to that that could be potentially. troubling if our adversaries knew it.

I'm I'm I'm racking my brain here right George so again that the I'm thinking of of any potential harm to national security here and.

“and and classification is is that's how classification systems are designed it's it's what is the harm to national security is a grave significant severe whatever you know whatever and that's that's what determines.”

the various levels of classification again. not surprising that we had reaper drones looking at that particular portion of the desert in Syria not surprising at all zero. there's been a change in government since that video has been recorded that the situation security situation is changed dramatically in Syria.

so again, it generally the the class the reasons for classification are capability so sensor platform or location and again I don't see any plausible reason why.

again there's public imagery of this of this type of footage out there in the in the wild put out by the military and there I just don't see any logical reason why the location. again what was his five years ago now why that should be classified all right arrow.

“you have access to everything that's what to tell us you want to be transparent go get this the rest of this data and let us take a look at it let the public analyze it if if you're not going to do it.”

and arrow frankly needs to where our taxpayers taxpayer dollars going they were silent after that Yemen hellfire video that was released. during a congressional hearing last year not a peep nothing after and you know they're literally can see the metrics tens of millions of views that videos as received across various. news and media platforms not a peep so what what is our government what is our pentagon where our tax dollars going we have an office. specifically specifically task congressionally task to to investigate this kind of stuff not a peep out of them so they better.

I look at a bare minimum they should confirm whether they have this this footage in their holdings this arrow even have this footage. I don't the answer that question but we can start there. I mean I'll say this is it's really a dance as journalist Georgian I try to figure out you know can we put something out you know we're trying to follow all the rules here with journalism there's so much that comes. I'll say in front of our eyes that we can't we just can't you know and there's a lot of reasons embedded within some of the things you just said.

that would be those reasons that journalists don't report on certain things you know but this one doesn't have any of that there's no indication to me that we had zero indication that this is not something that is acceptable to the public. So the public has always been asking for more data and you know good or bad that's what we're trying to do is put our best foot forward and show and just enrich the data set that's out there on UAP with videos so this is not like a trust me bro situation. You see it now you analyze it we don't usually do this America we don't usually do a whole analysis of it because we're not experts at it me and George you know usually we put it out we say okay here's another piece of data you know take out your your knives and dissect it but it was really fun and neat and interesting for you to give us a background it allows me to kind of understand and see what I'm looking at kind of better now.

I think we should play the footage again or something like that you know in the episode but just thank you so much for breaking that down for everybody let's bottom line it here. I am very impressed with this footage and believe it to be showing something at this point I believe it to be showing something truly extraordinary that we have heard throughout history and from pilots but I never seen footage of it until now.

This is again in my book this is extraordinary footage after the initial analysis at least and and thank you thank you for driving the conversation forward because this is the kind of stuff.

And with you know with with when you add all the congressional hearings in the age of disclosure and and all that we've seen over the last several years you guys are driving the conversation forward so so thank you for for everything that you're doing.

“Thanks, Mary. By the way, I'm always the optimist of our duo Jeremy is the pessimist and we might have a reason to have you come back real soon as possible interesting. I've been treating.”

Is it a thread or a promise? Yeah, exactly. Hey, Mary, thanks so much man. We'll see you. We'll see you soon. Jeremy, I'm trying to remember when we sat down in the hotel room and recorded a little session about this particular video clip and how long ago that was six months ago maybe or something like that. I wouldn't know time George anticipating that someday we hope to release it and we're you know given our best shot of trying to figure out what we're seeing on the screen. There's someone as bright and as knowledgeable as Merrick and I can't help but feel like an idiot compared to him, but that was that was very welcome analysis and now the rest of the world can take a look at it and make up their own minds about it.

Absolutely, it's it's about enriching the data set and and putting it out. Now I will say though, this is not just like some you know video that just could be a thing we have to stress this this is labeled UAP by your intelligence agencies and government.

It was part of an extensive analysis done because it's a UAP on specifically the apparent instantaneous acceleration.

“So when you see those cards between that's what so I created those cards based on my knowledge set right word for word. I mean so if you if you think about it. This is their investigation into instantaneous acceleration.”

So how much more there is that show extraordinary capabilities like this that just it's conversation stoppers you're like okay there is stuff that can move in ways that everybody has told us UAP can do you know for for decades and decades it's not centuries now it's it's really fascinating. If you're told over and over month after month this is a new era of transparency we want to be transparent we want to get to the bottom of this analyze these videos and cases photos and evidence and figure out what it is if it's if it's something we don't know then we'll say it.

Time to get off the pot I'd say there's no reason as Mary says there's no reason why the public can't see that kind of video that there have to be extraordinary steps taken to share it with the public both in U.S. and around the world and there's so much more similar kinds of clips that that exist in in servers.

“And there's no reason to hold it back if not just from us what about Congress there's a task force a Congress that is seeking this information why can't you share it with them as as a first step.”

You know time to time to live up to the ideals that are supposedly the reason that era was created in the first place will do our best will stick to the way we've been doing things which is very carefully and slowly. But I think you know we keep going yeah, there are reasons to be suspicious as we know and those reasons I think will eventually come out at the some of the subterfuge it's going on right now right now right and in the meantime it's birthday time it's fine time for you to have some fun.

Hope you enjoy your birthday hope people don't raise you too much on social media now that they know about it and I'll talk to you soon.

you