Karen Read's bombshell lawsuit. Twist in Crystal Rogers case. Plus, Legally Brunette host Emily Simpson.

They care about how I feel. It's the staff on the app. It's the connections you make.

“Without good mental and physical help, you have nothing.”

It tells me how to cook to keep myself healthy. I look at my happening like while I'm on this 7,000 steps today. Star Today meets you where you are. Download the Star Today Wellness app now on your Avalor Android device. Terms apply, see app for details.

I'm Craig Melve Cheers. Cheers.

I've always been a glass half volt kind of guy.

And now I'm talking to some people who look at the world that we too. Some really fascinating folks who share their defining moments, their trials, challenges, their stories, their funny, and my candy. So I hope you'll join me each week and who knows. You might just come away with your own glass half volt.

Search glass half volt with Craig Melve, from today on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. Alright, let's begin. You're listening to the Dateline story meeting. I mean, I have Josh back on me after it's just great.

You're really long. Our team is catching up on breaking crime news. It's really horrifying. It's all in video. When do you think it's going to wrap up? Well, I think we have to find out more.

Welcome to Dateline True Crime Weekly.

“It's June 11th, and here's what's on our docket.”

A stunning arrest in Bardstown, Kentucky. The brother of the man convicted of murdering Kentucky, mom of five, Crystal Rogers, is now facing criminal charges, too. Prosecutors alleged that Nick made false statements between July 2015 and April 2023.

In Dateline Roundup, we've got updates from the Bahamas about the investigation into the mysterious disappearance of a Michigan woman. And Brendan Banfield, the former IRS agent, convicted of murdering his wife so he could start life over with the family repair. Learns his fate.

He did not just take her mother from her. He placed her in the middle of the horror you created. Plus, Emily Simpson, the lawyer, turned real housewife, who hosts the True Crime Podcast legally brunette, will be here to dissect one of the biggest true crime documentaries of the year.

Two young people died, and you know she's dressing up as a corpse. It just shows just a lack of accountability, a lack of remorse. Before all that, we're heading to Massachusetts, where Karen Reed has filed a bombshell new lawsuit. It's been nearly a year since Karen Reed was acquitted

of murdering her police officer boyfriend, Jon O'Keefe. When the verdict was read, I was sitting inside the Norfolk Superior courthouse and could hear the thunderous applause and cheers from her supporters outside.

The defendant knocked guilty or guilty. But I was going to say you missed the phone. I was going to say you all.

After standing trial twice, Karen finally won her freedom,

but she wasn't finished fighting. She has filed suit against the Massachusetts State Police and the Canton Police Department. The lawsuit says the two agencies should be "forced to answer"

for the way their investigators handled her case. Reed's new lawsuit exposes for the first time dozens of texts and voicemails former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor is alleged to have exchanged with former Canton Police

officer Sean Good. The voicemails are so offensive we can't claim most of them for you. Karen Reed and her defense team argued the officers were unfit to serve

and their supervisors knew it. Here to tell us more is Date Line Producer Su Simpson. Hey Su. I Andrea.

Here we are back again talking about Karen Reed. You were there with me when she stood on the courthouse steps after her acquittal. So did you think that would be the last we'd hear from her? Not a chance Andrea.

Not after what Karen Reed has been true. She sees herself as a victim of corruption and bigotry. Hence the lawsuit. Karen sat down for an exclusive interview

on the today's show last week and right by her side was her attorney, Alan Jackson. Let's take a listen.

I was never going to be able to just

forget that this happened to me that I was wronged in this way. I couldn't just go back to life as it was. But I always knew this was going to happen if I could get help legally to do this.

The ultimate goal is to ensure that we bring to the light. The institutional biases, the institutional corruption that permeates. The Massachusetts law enforcement system.

“That's what this lawsuit is going to do ultimately.”

Before we dive into the lawsuit, for people who don't remember refresh us on the case. So back to January 29th, 2022. John O'Keeffe's battered body was found on the

lawn of a home in Canton. He was lying in the snow. He was unresponsive. Karen Reed said she dropped him off at a house party hours earlier and he didn't come home.

She didn't know what had happened.

2022 and accused of killing John. Give us a quick overview of the prosecutions case against her. Prosecutors argued that Karen drove John to the house party and then she ran over with her SUV in a drunken range.

Two juries were not convinced by the prosecutions theory. We saw Sue 100 and one acquittal. Karen's defense team said the investigation had been shot from the start. They also said that John's injuries weren't consistent

with being run over. That it looked like he'd been beaten up and been bitten by a dog.

“Right Andrea, and that's important because the people”

inside the house were Karen had dropped John off owned a German shepherd at the time. The defense questioned why the lead investigator hadn't dropped to anyone in the house and it turns out that the house belonged to a Boston police officer named

Brian Albert and the lead investigator, Michael Proctor, had personal ties to Albert. Michael Proctor, who is such a big part of this new lawsuit,

he came into focus for us at Karen's first trial.

Sue, you were in the courtroom. The day he was on the witness stand and the prosecution asked him to read texts that he had sent to some high school friends within hours of John's body being found. Can you read that response for the jury?

There'll be some serious charges brought on the girl. So what was so surprising about that text and others was that it seemed like Proctor had made up his mind about the case of very early in the investigation. And then the text went on.

“He called Karen Reed a babe and he also used the C word”

about her. And there was even more on cross examination that a fence got proctor to read text he'd sent to his work colleagues and let's take a listen to some of that. She's a whack job, she's gross.

No nude so far. No nude so far. Correct. Correct. You said that to your bosses.

Yes sir. The day the jury announced it was deadlocked.

In Karen's first trial, Michael Proctor was suspended

from his job and was eventually fired in part because of those messages. Now Proctor is front and center again in this new civil lawsuit suit. So what are the main allegations?

Well, the lawsuit boils down to something quite simple.

“Karen Reed says both the mass state police and the Canton PD”

were negligent in how they hired, trained, and supervised their officers. She says what she calls Proctor's quote bias and corrupt investigation was the natural consequence of hiring and promoting bias and corrupt law enforcement officers.

She's not just talking about Michael Proctor. The lawsuit also names former Canton police officer Sean Good who we mentioned off the top. Remind us of who he is.

Well, Sean Good testified at Karen Reed's first trial.

According to the lawsuit, Sean Good had known Proctor for years. He was a police sergeant on the Canton PD. The lawsuit notes that they exchanged thousands of communications over the years. So this batch of voicemails and texts between Proctor and Good

that are part of this suit have these messages been authenticated. Well, Proctor and Good haven't commented on these ones in particular. At least that we know of, and at least not publicly. So you've gone through all the messages, Sue. And they are so offensive and disturbing.

We can't even share most of them. Tell us what you can about what they're saying. The suit alleges both man is racial slurs. Here's one example of voicemail the lawsuit said came from Proctor calling Good to give him a heads up, but a car accident.

Take your time. I said it was involved. So that wouldn't rush if you're working. Let them die. The lawsuit also quotes both man calling women the sea word sluts. Here's another voicemail. This is allegedly Proctor talking about women.

You're a filthy pig. They used to dirty things up. Wow. And these are the things we can tell you about my gunners. Sue the lawsuit alleges that the two men's supervisors should have known about their prejudices. Karen Reed is asking for damages from the Massachusetts State Police and the Canton Police Department.

How have they responded to the lawsuit? The MSP put out a statement saying, "These racist, sexist, and abhorrent comments. Absolutely do not reflect the values of the MSP. The same thing went on to say those values are tolerated

and they underscore the decision made to terminate Michael Proctor. Now the town of Canton told NBC, "These messages are deeply offensive, hateful, and do not reflect the values of the Canton Police Department or its members." So I spoke to Michael Proctor for our date line episode on the case last year

and Sue told us that he should not have been fired over the text messages.

and that he should be reinstated to the Massachusetts State Police and get his job back.

“In 12 years I've never had a single complaint.”

I've never been in the subject of any disciplinary actions.

All my employee valuations are outstanding or excellence. And I still love the job, I still want to be a trooper. It has Michael Proctor said anything about the latest allegations. Proctor's attorney dismissed these new messages saying that anything Proctor did or said in his personal life years before Officer O'Keef was killed

and no bearing whatsoever on the investigation of Karen Reed. As for Sean Good, he was put on paid leave by the Canton Police Department back in October. We don't know why other than that he was being investigated by internal affairs. Just before the lawsuit was announced he resigned from the force.

We don't know if that was because of the lawsuit

“NBC News reached out to Good but he has not made any comments so far.”

So Sue amazingly, this is not the only legal battle right now that Karen Reed is embroiled in. What the party goers at Brian Albert's house, the night of John O'Keef's death, filed a defamation suit against Karen Reed and the blogger, known as Turtle Boy. Then there's Karen's own federal lawsuit against the party goers in Michael Proctor himself in which she claims they conspired to frame her for murder.

And finally, John O'Keef's family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Reed,

a trial if there is one is expected to happen in 2027. 2027, that's a long way off. On the today's show last week, Craig Melvin asked Karen about her life after all of this. So let's say you when the civil suit then what comes next to you personally. Personally, I'd like to keep talking about what I've experienced.

I haven't really been free enough, especially with all these lawsuits to say, all that I've experienced.

“And I think it would be a waste for me to just disappear and go live on an island,”

although I would like to do that. So there are so many theories about what happened to John O'Keef the night he died. Do you think we're ever going to know what really happened that night? They're so much floating out there. I think if we get answers, they may come from the wrongful death suit filed by the family,

but we're just going to have to wait and see. Thank you so much for coming on. Coming up, a new development in a case I've been covering for years. The murder of Missing Kentucky Mom Crystal Rogers. Hey guys, Willie Guys here reminding you to check out the Sunday Sit Down podcast.

On this week's episode, I get together with the multi-talented Mindy Kaling to talk about her beginnings on the office, her hit creation running point, and her latest series, not suitable for work. You can get our conversation for free, wherever you get download your podcasts. On July 3, 2015, 35-year-old Crystal Rogers vanished after spending the holiday weekend

with her boyfriend, Brooks Hauk. Crystal's parents, Sheri and Tommy Ballard spent every moment trying to find out what happened to her. Searching, putting up billboards around town and organizing vigils. And then, a year after her disappearance, another tragedy hit. Someone shot and killed Tommy, Crystal's dad, his murder remains unsolved.

But answers did come in Crystal's case.

Last year, 10 years after she disappeared, and even though her body has never been found,

three men were convicted in connection with her murder. Her boyfriend, Brooks Hauk, and father and son, Steven and Joseph Lawson. But over the years, another name kept surfacing during the investigation. Brooks's brother, Nick Hauk, a former Bardstown police officer. Nick had come under suspicion early, but was never charged with a crime, until now.

Crystal's mother Sheri told NBC affiliate Wave she's been waiting for this moment. "It is like, finally, oh my gosh." Here to bring us the latest twist in this saga is Dateline producer Rachel White, who has been relentlessly following this story from the beginning. Hey, Rachel. Hi, Andrea. As we said, so many big twists in this case.

But Rachel first reminded us of who Crystal was, and what happened the day she disappeared back in 2015. Sure, so Crystal Rogers was a 35-year-old mother of five.

and they shared a child together named Eli. On July 3, 2015, she and Brooks went to his family farm. At the time, Brooks told investigators that they spent the day there and then went back to their home together. He said that when he went to bed, Crystal was playing games on her phone, like she usually did, but when he woke up the next day, Crystal was gone.

So Rachel investigators immediately begin to poke holes in Brooks's story. What's the prosecution's theory about Brooks's role in Crystal's disappearance?

So, prosecutors argued that Crystal never went back to her home that night, that she was killed on the Hauk family farm.

Jersey heard evidence of infidelity and growing problems between the two. Prosecutors said that Brooks stood to face personal and financial consequences if Crystal did leave him,

“like paying child support or losing custody of their son, and that that's why he killed her.”

And they argued that Brooks also enlisted others to help him carry out this plan. Okay, so let's talk about Brooks's brother Nick, the whole reason that we are revisiting this story in this moment. How did Nick first become a part of this case? So Nick is Brooks Hauk's brother.

At the time Crystal disappeared, he was a local police officer with the Bardstown Police Department.

And just a few days after Crystal went missing on July 8th, 2015, Brooks was being interviewed by investigators when Nick called him. And Brooks takes the call. I love hearing, I know that you did not look here in your interview with the detective. And what happens next is captured on the tape of this police interview. I'm innocent, I've done nothing wrong, what you know.

I know you told me innocent people got jammed up, but if you're telling me to leave, I'll get up and leave. You can't hear Nick's side of the call, so we can't know for sure what Nick was telling Brooks to do. But we did interview the detective that was in the room during this call for our date line episode as you know. And he said it seemed like Nick was telling Brooks to get up and leave. Nick later said that he was just trying to protect his brother, but obviously investigators were curious if Nick knew anything.

So they interviewed him a week later.

“Did your brother ever call you to say that he does something to Crystal?”

Definitely did not.

During his interview with investigators Rachel Nick told them that his brother would never harm Crystal.

And he also denied having any involvement himself in Crystal's disappearance. So you never helped him move a lot. I have been not never helped him move any evidence. Never. Three months after Crystal's disappearance, Nick was fired from the Bardstown Police Department for,

quote, interfering with the investigation. An investigators really kept the heat on him, right? Yeah, so the sheriff's office asked him for a DNA sample during one of their searches a year after Crystal disappeared. And he cooperated. His home was searched by the FBI years later, but perhaps the most surprising time I heard his name come up was during a pre trial hearing for his brother Brooks. This was right after Brooks had been arrested.

So like eight years or so after Crystal's disappearance, the special prosecutor told the judge in open court that an undercover officer had purchased a gun from Nick that was similar to a gun used in connection to another mysterious death in Bardstown. Okay, and this mysterious death is one of those big twists we were talking about at the top of the segment. Yes, exactly. And perhaps the most tragic twist in this story. The gun was very similar to the one used to kill Crystal's dad, Tommy Ballard, who was shot dead while hunting in 2016 about 16 months after Crystal disappeared.

Just a horrible situation tragic for the family, and no one has ever been charged in Tommy's murder to this day. Last year, another big moment in all of this at Brooks's trial, Nick and their mother Brooks and Nick's mother were identified by the prosecution as unindicted co-conspirators in Crystal's murder. Rachel explained to us what that means. So an unindicted co-conspirator is someone prosecutors believe participated in a criminal conspiracy, but they've not been charged with a crime. Maybe the prosecution doesn't have enough evidence to bring the charges or just wants to focus on the defendant currently on trial.

But it's potentially controversial. The person can't really defend themselves because they haven't been charged.

“So what did prosecutors tell the jury at Brooks's trial about Nick's alleged involvement of the events surrounding Crystal's murder?”

Juris heard testimony from Nick's former girlfriend, Amber Bowman, and she said that at the time, she and Nick were in the middle of packing up to move when he left, telling her he was going to help Brooks with a rental property.

Prosecutors pointed out that those calls were made during the same period when Crystal disappeared. The prosecution isn't saying exactly what they think Nick did to help his brother.

“They're just saying, they think he helped.”

Correct. So their point is that Brooks couldn't have done what he did by himself, and Nick went dark at the same time as the murder was happening, which they say is suspicious. Brooks's defense said there was a perfectly innocent reason for Nick's phone being off. He was fighting with his girlfriend.

Well, despite all the suspicion over the years, Nick was never charged in connection to Crystal's murder, and he continued to live in Bardstown.

Now, that brings us to this new indictment involving Nick. Yeah, this is the big new development. So last week, Nick Halk was indicted on a felony charge of perjury. If convicted, he could face one to five years in prison. And we should say, as of this taping, prosecutors have not publicly said whether this perjury charge is directly tied to Crystal's case. But according to the indictment, prosecutors alleged that Nick made false statements between July 2015 and April 2023. And those dates span much of the Crystal Rogers investigation. Nick has not made any public comment about his arrest. He has been released on bond.

Rachel, what's next for him? His arrangement is scheduled for next week on June 18th, and that hearing may give us our first indication of exactly what statements prosecutors believe constitute perjury.

Lots of movement, as always, in this case, Rachel. But of course, the one thing the family truly wants is to know where Crystal is.

“Yeah, I think that would mean a lot to the family, and I think getting answers on what happened to Tommy would mean the world to them too.”

Absolutely. Thank you, Rachel. Up next, it's time for Dateline Roundup. We'll take you inside the courtroom for the sentencing of Brendan Bamfield. The former IRS agent who murdered his wife to start life over with the family of pair. Plus, the McKenzie Cherilla case is making headlines. Emily Simpson, who hosts the true crime podcast, legally brunette, will be here to tell us why. Welcome back to the podcast. Joining us for this week's Dateline Roundup is Senior Producer Brad Davis. Hey, Brad.

Hey, I'd like to see you too. For our first story, we are heading to Virginia for the sentencing of former IRS agent, Brendan Bamfield. Back in February, he was convicted of orchestrating a deadly cat-fishing plot that left his wife and another man dead. Brad, give us a refresher on this case. Sure. On February 24, 2023, police responded to a gruesome scene at the band filled home in Northern Virginia.

Christine Bamfield was a pediatric nurse and she had been fatally stabbed, and she was lying on the floor of the bedroom. And not far from her was the body of another person, 39-year-old Joseph Ryan. Christine's husband Brendan Bamfield told police that he'd walked in on Joseph's stabbing Christine and he shot him to try and protect her. That story did not add up for the investigators. That's right. They quickly suspected that Brendan had killed Christine and discovered evidence that he had been having an affair with the families who appear.

And that the two of them had actually come up with an elaborate plan to get Christine out of the way. They had used Christine's photo and her name on a fetish website to try and lure Joseph to the bandfield house. Investigators think that when Joseph showed up, he had thought he was going to have consensual sex with Christine and said Brendan and then Julia shot him. And Brendan stabbed Christine. The case that come while Thurs is Brendan Bamfield, Mr. Bamfield's press in the courtroom with his attorney.

Last Friday, Brendan Bamfield appeared for his sentencing hearing at the Fairfax County Circuit Court. It began with victim impact statements.

“Who was there to represent the victims in this case?”

First of all, it was Christine's sister, Daniel Hawker. I will forever carry both the grief of losing her too soon. And the gratitude of having loved her for 37 years, and being loved by her in return.

That bond will not end because we will always be sisters.

The family of the other victim, Joseph Ryan, was also there. His mother addressed the court. Joe wasn't the disposable caricature. He was made out to be. He had a face. He had a name. He had a life. But Brendan Bamfield shot his face. Soiled his name and treated his life as disposable.

Yeah, Brendan Bamfield gave an 11 minute speech.

He was practically re-litigating the case. I was found guilty of a crime that I did not commit. He was actually impossible to have committed the crime as the prosecution, the experts, and their witnesses have presented.

“What was his demeanor like while he was talking to the court?”

It was pretty cold and flat. He kept looking down at his papers, reading his speech plainly. He started at some points. Did Brendan address the loss of his wife, Christine, at all? He really didn't talk about Christine until the very end of his speech. She truly was a caring mother, caring wife, loving nurse.

But I am not responsible for her death. Following Brendan Bamfield's speech, the judge did not hold back, right Brad? Yeah, she really didn't. She pointed out the horror and evil of his crimes, saying it's rare for her to see someone with no remorse for what they've done. And she acknowledged the unspoken victim, Christine's daughter. You did not just take her mother from her, you placed her in the middle of the horror you created.

She is young now, but one day she will understand your true self. And she will understand what you took from her, which is everything. I carry no burden and find no hesitation in sentencing you to life. All right, let's go to San Diego, Brad, for our next story, where it is week four in the Larry Miliatte trial.

“You'll remember that he's the man accused of murdering his wife Maya after paying over a thousand dollars to people to cast magic spells on her.”

Larry has pleaded not guilty. Brad, what is the latest from the courtroom? Yeah, so the prosecution is still presenting its case, and they're using some of Larry's own texts to try and paint a picture of his relationship with Maya and the time before her disappearance. Brad Larry, sister Genesis, has become an important witness in this trial? Yes, she has. The prosecution entered his hundreds of her texts with Larry into evidence, and they're pretty intense. According to Genesis, Larry admitted that he had put a tracking device in Maya's car, and he told her about the spell casting.

He sent a picture of a makeshift alter he had set up with candles positioned around a picture of Larry and Maya. And jurors heard some revealing passages from Maya's journal this week in court? Yes, prosecutor showed entries from years before Maya disappeared, addressed to her daughters, where she talked about her fights with Larry. She wrote that she was afraid of him, and that he was capable of hurting her.

We should say, Brad, according to court records, Larry was never charged in connection to any domestic violence incidents.

For our final story, we are headed back to the Bahamas for an update in the case of Lynette Hooker, who went missing there in early April. Her husband Brian told police that the two were on a dinghy going from hope down to elbow key when Lynette fell overboard with the keys to the dinghy. That's right, after your point of remissing, the Royal Bahamas police set off searching for Lynette, but didn't find her. Lynette's daughter, Carly, told me that she did not buy Brian's story from the get-go, and she mentioned problems in the marriage.

They have history of not getting along, especially when they drink. Brian was taken into custody and questioned he was released five days later. Yes, as you know, he said all along that he had nothing to do with her disappearance, and he vowed to keep looking for her.

“So we know the couple's boat called Solmate was seized in Florida in May, Brad, what is new?”

A US official told NBC News last week that after examining the boat's GPS, it looks like Brian might have given them the wrong location for where Lynette went missing. So US divers arrived in the Bahamas last week and started looking for her in a different spot, the Abacose Sea. According to photos obtained by NBC News, cadaver dogs were also taken at a boat yard where Brian was on the day he reported to Lynette missing. On Monday, authorities announced that nobody was found. The US Coast Guard said in a statement that their recent search has concluded and that the investigation is ongoing.

They encourage anyone with information to come forward. Okay, thank you so much for these updates, Brad. You're welcome. For our final segment this week, we wanted to talk about a case that has sparked intense debate across social media. The case of Mackenzie Sharilla.

In 2023, the Ohio teenager was convicted by a judge of murdering her boyfriend Dominic Russo and a friend, 19-year-old Davian Flanagan. Both were passengers in Mackenzie's car when prosecutors say she drove nearly a hundred miles per hour into a brick wall, killing them both.

A recent Netflix documentary on the case called The Crash has been a breakout hit since its debut in May with over 58 million views worldwide so far.

I've never spoke before and I never told my side of the story, but I just want to say my truth and I just know myself and I know I'm not a monster.

“But not all of the renewed attention on the case has been welcomed.”

Some of the victims family members are speaking out. She's a psychopath. A stone called psychopath. She has no remorse. She's continuing to lie.

You know, I wish she was, I didn't hear her name anymore. I asked Emily Simpson, my friend, and fellow true crime podcast host to come on the show to talk about the case and the documentaries fall out. Emily, who was a lawyer, is no stranger to being in the spotlight. In addition to hosting her podcast, Lee Glee Brunette. She's also a cast member on the Real Housewives of Orange County.

Hey, Emily, welcome back to the podcast. Hi, Andrea. Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here. Yes.

Well, you are the one who actually turned me on to this documentary. Thank you. And then I saw that our NBC studios team was also covering it for their video podcast allegedly on Netflix. So Emily, what was your takeaway from McKenzie's interview in the doc? I do like the fact that they showed that she had her attorney present because you didn't know that in the beginning of her interview.

She's just sitting there answering questions constantly talking about she wanted to make sure she hammered in the intent that there was no intent. They showed a little bit of her conversation with her attorney saying, basically, did I nail it? Did I make all the points that there was no intent?

“Part of I think why people are so interested in this is because of the division, right?”

Like, which side are you on? Prosecutors said that McKenzie intentionally drove her car into the wall. But in her Netflix interview, she blamed what happened on a medical condition called pots. A nervous system disorder. So McKenzie says she blocked out before the crash.

But when we talk about the medical condition, I feel like it doesn't take a medical expert or a doctor. To think if she did have some type of medical episode where she did pass out or blacked out, wouldn't your hand, your body, it would have gone relaxed.

The fact that the car was the hundred miles per hour, her foot never came off the gas.

To me, it means that she had to grip tightly to keep that car going a hundred miles an hour straight into a wall. And Emily from behind bars, McKenzie appears well aware of the attention that her story is receiving. In a recently released undated jail call, and we don't know if this conversation was before or after the dot came out. McKenzie spoke with an unidentified friend about the growing interest in her case. And even expressed hope that one very famous advocate might take notice.

Let's take a listen to that call. But I was like, maybe Kim Kardashian seemed, you know, like, oh, yeah, maybe Kim will now that it's like all of I was like, I mean, that's the only thing that might be good about the whole media thing. Maybe Kim will see it. I don't know.

“You have to figure out because I'm real nervous.”

And I want Kim Kardashian to be my lawyer. So this is now her saying she wants Kim Kardashian to be her lawyer. Why not Emily Simpson?

Well, first of all, can we just say the Kim is not an attorney?

Can we just make that clear? Did she finally pass the baby bar? She did pass the baby bar, but she did not pass the big of the bar. Maybe choose someone else with more experience. So in the Netflix documentary, Emily, we learned that before the crash McKenzie was very active on social media. She aspired or appeared to aspire to become a model or an influencer.

And some of her posts were even introduced as evidence during her trial. Emily, you was a lawyer and someone you have your own huge social media presence. Do you think McKenzie's online persona might have worked against her? In court? Oh, it absolutely worked against her.

I don't know if you saw the prosecution was smart to bring up all the her social media posts in front of the judge. And you know, two young people died. And you know, she's dressing up as a corpse just a couple months after the crash. And the Halloween about it, the Halloween costumes. It just shows just a lack of accountability, a lack of remorse.

As for the victims in this case, Davian and Dominic, their families were also featured in the documentary. Dominic Sister Christine Russo says the aftermath has not been easy. She talked to NBC affiliate WKYC about some of the unwelcome attention. It's brought from people online. There are certain things on the internet that people put out for attention.

That it's just so cruel. I just wanted to spread awareness. And, you know, not clicking on those things and not giving that kind of disgusting things. Attention because there are actually grieving families behind this entertainment. That's out there for everybody else.

So actually, I did do an interview yesterday with Christine. Oh, okay. And Christine and the other family, the flanigans, are working very hard to change the son of Sam Law. Yes. And Ohio, but, you know, hopefully nationwide.

Emily, just tell us a little bit about the son of Sam Laws. What are they intended for? Well, the point is that someone that commits a violent crime. So, you know, rape murder doesn't then get to benefit from that crime

I believe it was written in the '70s.

“So it has not progressed to this digital age where people are able to profit from, you know, having a social media presence.”

And so I know that Christine Russo and the flanigan family were working to change that. So we're going to follow that and see what happens. Mackenzie, after being convicted, she was sentenced to 15 years to life. And will not be eligible for parole until 2037. Something tells me we haven't heard the last of Mackenzie or this case.

Emily, I knew you were the perfect person to bring on to talk about this topic. So we're so grateful that you joined us. Thank you.

Well, thanks for having me.

Andrea, I appreciate it.

“Well, you can't wait to have you back on legally burnette.”

Thank you. And you can catch updates on the case on Emily's podcast as she said, legally burnette or right here on Dateline True Crime Weekly. And the doc, the crash, is available on Netflix. And you can find the video podcast allegedly also on Netflix.

That's it for this episode of Dateline True Crime Weekly. Don't forget to check out Keith's new original podcast series, Five Miles From Home. It's a chilling story about the murder of a high school track star in a desert town. Michaela Mickey Costanza was just like any other teen, but what happened to her was the ultimate act of betrayal. I had gotten a tit saying that he had had her.

And I said, I know where she's at. Let's go.

“Episodes 1 and 2 are out now wherever you get your podcasts.”

To get early access to new episodes, add free, subscribe to Dateline Premium.

And coming up this Friday, Jose Diaz Belart has his first ever date line episode.

And it's a good one. You know when you're coming out of a breakup, sometimes you just want to change. That's exactly what 40 year old Anna Kinesovich was looking for when she left her life in Florida behind and headed to Spain in December 2023. It was supposed to be an exciting new chapter full of adventure and new experiences.

But just a few months into that journey on a vanished. I wanted to come here and just do everything that I can and my power to find my friend. Watch, missing Anna, this Friday at 109 Central on Dateline on NBC. Thanks for listening. Dateline True Crime Weekly is produced by Carson Cummins,

Caroline Casey, Keanu Reed and Rebecca Glazer. Our associate producers are Ellary Gladstone Roth and Arigha Young. Our senior producer is Liz Brown Curl off. Veronica Mazeka is our digital producer. Rick Juan is our sound designer.

Original music by Jessie McGinty. Paul Ryan is executive producer. And Liz Cole is senior executive producer of Dateline. Alright, happy, whatever it is. Thursday.

Bye. Friday night on an all new deadline. I believe Anna was in that suitcase. When a young woman vanishes overseas. I wanted to come here and just do everything that I can and my power to find my friend.

You really are in a race against time. An all new deadline. Friday night at 109 Central. Only on NBC.