Silicon Valley billionaires’ war on democracy

Are weekly series if you can keep it tackles the big political stories of the day?

And why they matter for our democracy?

“We answer your questions from what's at stake in the mid-terms to quote, "if formed,”

fixing wealth inequality." And beyond, join me, Todd's Willick, and me, Jen White, on the One A podcast from WAMU and NPR. This is fresh air. I'm Tanya Mosley. For 20 years, Silicon Valley's unofficial slogan has been to move fast and break things, the breaking the price of progress. But my guess today says what's being broken right now is

American democracy. In his new book, Journalist Gil Doran argues that a small circle of Silicon Valley billionaires and the venture capitalists who fund them have concluded that democracy is in their way, and that they should be governing in its place. As the outgoing president, Joe Biden gave a similar warning against what he called "the rise of attack-industrial complex." Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation,

enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling. Others are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact-checking.

“The truth is smothered by lies, told for power and for profit.”

We must hold the social platform accountable to protect our children or families in a very democracy from the abuse of power. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is most consequence of technology of our time, perhaps of all time. Nothing offers more profound possibilities and risk for our economy and our security, our society. It's a very of a free humanity. Artificial intelligence even has the potential to help us answer my cold and cancers we know it.

But unless safeguards are in place, AI could spawn new threats to our rights, our way of life, to our privacy, how we work and how we protect our nation. Five days after that speech, at President Trump's inauguration, and the seats closest to the President, the one's normally reserved for family and

former presidents, sat some of the most powerful men in tech, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos,

Mark Zuckerberg, and soon-durper Chai. And later that day, Musk stood behind the presidential seal and made a gesture much of the world red as a Nazi salute. Duran's new book, The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy, argues that the men behind the President that day were not there to celebrate him. Their presence was proof that 30 years of patient-well-funded work had finally paid off.

He writes that some of them were inspired by a 1997 book called The Sovereign Individual, which predicted digital money would dissolve countries, and with a blogger named Curtis Yarvan, who argued America should be run like a corporation, by a CEO with the powers of a dictator. Gilderan began his career at the San Jose Mercury News, then spent 15 years in California politics, working with Diane Feinstein, Jerry Brown, and Kamala Harris. He returned to journalism in 2018,

running the opinion pages at the Sacramento B and the San Francisco Examiner. He now writes "The Newsletter, The Nerd Reich." Gild, welcome to Fresh Air. Thanks for having me. There was a time when a book like this, arguing that tech billionaires are unmasking themselves, and they have this plan to

in American democracy and replace it with things like corporate city states. It would have been shelved as a bunch of different conspiracy theories, but a lot of what you write about, you didn't have to uncover, you didn't have to unmask, you built the case out of

their own writings and speeches and interviews, because basically they have been stating

their beliefs and aspirations out loud for years.

“I think we were witnessing the unmasking of Silicon Valley's true politics.”

They finally were comfortable to reveal their full selves to everyone, and I think for many years, their democratic alignment was mostly self-interest, because we had democratic presidents who had important contracts, government contracts, who had power, and so they needed to get along with whoever had power. And now that Trump was returning to power, they saw an opportunity to align with him and to try to realign the country's politics to something more to their liking.

I think it's grown quietly as we've seen many of these people become billionaires and multi-billionaires,

amassed, then they went power. But for some people in Silicon Valley, specifically Peter Teal,

this idea of using technology to amass wealth and then turn that into monopolistic political power is something that was not accidental, it was something that was carefully cultivated over many decades. And as you said, none of my book came from secret documents or it's not guessing. This is stuff that these guys have been saying on the record very explicitly for decades. Okay, let's break this down a little bit more, because I mean, most people might assume

that if democracy breaks under all of this tech money and power, it's collateral damage, because these are rich men chasing profit and the country suffers along the way. Part of a big part of what you are also arguing is the opposite of that that the breaking actually is the goal. Definitely. My book is about a cult of Silicon Valley billionaires who believe that in the 21st century technology will make democracy obsolete. And it goes back a few decades.

“In 1997, if you want to know the full root of it, there was a book that came out called the”

sovereign individual that predicted that in the 21st century technology would result in the end of democracy and nation states like the United States. Specifically, the book said that two technologies won something called cyber currency, which we would today consider crypto, and another called

advanced automation, which is basically AI, would collapse the economy and thereby the government

itself, and would lead to the rise of a new cognitive elite. These sovereign individuals, wealthy individuals who by making the right investments in the right moves would be able to profit from the destruction of the United States and other democratic nation states. And the book was very poorly reviewed and sounded like a conspiracy cookbook to most people, but it had such a profound effect on Peter Teele that he has credited it for being one of the reasons why he started PayPal

as an effort to get ahead of this predicted cyber currency that would transform politics in the 21st century. Right, Peter Teele read it. He grabbed onto it. He, as you mentioned, is the co-founder of PayPal and Palantir, and he's a major funder of Facebook, which made him a billionaire. You know, in particular,

when we talk about Teele in the past, it has always been that some of his ideas around democracy

and politics were strange and fringe. He'd written among other things that he no longer believed freedom and democracy were compatible. And part of what you're saying here is this book, the sovereign individual had a huge impact on his belief system, but how did that form his desires and aspirations? Well, in the decades after the sovereign individuals published, you see Teele continue to make moves

“that are clearly based on the book. But of course, you have to know the book in order to know that”

and most people were not familiar with the book because while it became a cult hit in Silicon Valley later, at the time it was sort of an obscure book that many reviewers dismissed as cookie conspiracy theory, apocalyptic. Yeah, right, the United States is going to be collapsing on the 21st century. This seemed like a joke back in the good old days of 1997. But in the subsequent years, Teele goes on to give speeches and write essays where he talks about the rise of a digital currency that's

coming and then will subvert everything and cannot be stopped by Washington, which will have zero idea of what it's really about. In 2010, he gives a speech where he says that government is fundamentally evil. And this is weird because at the time, he's a co-founder of Palantir, which was started with investment from the CIA and which is a major government contractor. So you usually don't see government contractors calling the government fundamentally evil in public forums. And he goes on to

“become somebody who spreads these ideas to other important figures in Silicon Valley, like Mark”

Andrewsson, like Brian Armstrong of Coinbase, and in his book Zero to One, which is about startup startups and how to succeed in Silicon Valley in business. Peter Teele says it's important to start a business that runs like a cult because cults are organizations of total dedication, where people care about them more than anything else. And this is the way to really get things done as to start your own cult. And I would say that what Peter Teele was able to do is take his

fringe interest in these ideas and sort of start a cult where he spread them to other important

election and are aligned behind Trump. And if you look at what Trump is doing, a lot of the ideas

“that he's pursuing are ideas that were first thought of and promoted by Peter Teele and these billionaires.”

Teele's protege is the vice president, JD Vance, his surveillance company, as you as you said, holds the ice contract, 16 of his people work inside the administration. So this has gone beyond a cult within Silicon Valley and now it touches government with JD Vance in particular, you write that he is essentially Teele's investment. He helped Vance get his first job in tech, his conversion to Catholicism, he funded his Senate seat, walk us through how that relationship

carried Vance to the White House. Vance first met Teele at Yale Law School in 2011 when Teele gave us speech there and Teele invited him to come up to California someday and come up within a couple of years, Vance's Insilicon Valley working for a venture capital fund that was co-founded by Teele. Then when Vance

“goes back to Ohio decides to start his own venture fund, it's with money from Peter Teele,”

Mark Andrews and others, when Vance decides to run for Senate, it's with $15 million from Peter Teele,

which was the most money any single individual had ever spent to get someone elected to the U.S. Senate. And when Vance was being considered for vice president, it was Teele who made the peace between Vance and Trump because Vance had previously when he was anti-Trump referred to Trump as America's Hitler. So at every step of the way, it's Peter Teele who's clearing the way for JD Vance, who, after being an anti-Trump Republican, goes on to become a full-throated Trump supporter

and pro-Trump attack dog and who during his Senate campaign was quoting Curtis Yarvan, this tech-fascist philosopher who has openly stated that the United States needs to get rid of democracy and replace it with a monarch, a king or a dictator. And so you see the total effect of Peter Teele in completely shifting Vance's political identity and it's shocking that so quickly Vance got into the White House. And that's when I thought this is really going beyond what I

thought it would. When I started looking at this stuff a few years ago, I knew it was dangerous, but I didn't think it would be a danger to the country until five or ten years from now. When Vance got on the ticket, it became clear these ideas are going directly into the White House. And what was shocking to me is that very few people mentioned the depth of the till relationship, or the extremism of the ideas behind it.

Now, I want to talk about one of the other men you write about, biology, Srinivasan. He's a venture capitalist who writes among other things about replacing countries with privately owned startup societies, which we'll talk about at length a little later, but Srinivasan in 2023 goes on a podcast and describes how tech is taking over San Francisco. You reported that out and the piece went viral and there is something very specific that you

talked about regarding strategy with the red and the blues and then the grays that he describes the tech world as. Can you explain that? Certainly. So, biology Srinivasan is a prodigy of Peter Tiel, who was turned on to the book, the sovereign individual, by Peter Tiel, and considers it prescient, an important document that tells us what we're going. And in 2013, he gave a speech in which he said that tech needed to succeed, essentially, from the United States, that it was time for

Silicon Valley to move out of this country, get away from democracy, and develop its own new

“political systems, which raised some eyebrows at the time, but sort of seemed, I think, silly and”

eccentric to most people. Not like a, it wasn't a serious idea. It wasn't taken seriously, at least. By 2023, Srinivasan had updated his idea to a new political strategy by which something called the grey tribe, which he defined as the tech people in politics who were a rising force in US politics. The CEOs, the founders, the billionaires, would form this tech grey tribe, and this grey tribe

would partner with the red tribe, the Republicans, to basically outsten purge the blue tribe, the

Democrats, from the city of San Francisco. He was using San Francisco as a, as a test case. And this idea of the reds and the greys, teaming up against the blues, very much seems to be the

where there was a conference where it was basically the heritage foundation, the right-wing heritage

foundation, and the venture capitalists of San Francisco, meeting to compare notes and share the stage. And the title of the conference was reboot, the new reality. And the website for this conference said the new reality is already here. It's just not visible yet, and basically argued that tech was waking up to politics. And we were about to see this new power unleashed. And that new reality ended up being very much what Srinivasan spelled out, combining behind the Trump administration

to create an unprecedented disruption and attack on American democracy. And what Trump is getting out of it is to be funded. So more power, but I'm just, what, what do you know about his relationship

with some of these powerful guys, specifically the men that you write about, which come, come to

“be around like six or so men who hold an extraordinary amount of power through, through their wealth?”

The way to understand Trump's relationship with Silicon Valley is through crypto. Trump used to hate crypto. He called crypto a scam. And yeah, basically said that there was, it was in a real currency, only the dollar is real currency. He was the number one hater of crypto when he was president the first time. And on the day he returned to the White House in 2025, he became a crypto billionaire. Because billions of dollars are being funneled to the Trump family

and his into their coffers through crypto. And crypto basically is a weapon of mass corruption. It's a way that Silicon Valley can funnel massive amounts of money into the political system. And for some reason, the, the, the, the corruption is so massive that it's even hard for people to explain the Trump family has a mass billions through crypto. And it's normal, it's just become business as usual now in Washington. You know, when you reported about the reds and the

grays and the use of the reds to gain power for the grays, what you reported went viral and Sreenivasan actually came after you. And that's when somebody inside the crypto world actually sent you a message that gave you the title of this book. Because it is a provocative book using right in, in the title. Yes, people give me credit for the title, the nerd rike, but I did not come up with that. It was after I wrote about Sreenivasan and then went viral and I was under attack

for several days with people threatening me with lawsuits claiming I had made the entire story up even though everything was hyperlinked. You could go see the videos for yourself. And some people even sending scare or your threats than that. Someone from the crypto world reached out to me in a direct message and said, you know, we've been calling you guys the nerd rike for years. And that was surprising to me. It was shocking and I looked and no one was using that title for

“anything so I grabbed it and rebranded us the nerd rike. But I think it's important to note that”

this is not an aim I came up with. This is their own peers. These are people who largely agree with them. One matters of technology and even on some political stuff. But considered them

so extreme and hard-earned that they were comparing them to the third rike via the name the nerd rike.

What's it been like for you? You know what? I'm reading this book. It's really clear to me. You've got lots of footnotes here and sources here. Other media sources. These guys own writings and their interviews and speeches and private folks that have talked to you that want to remain anonymous. What have your efforts been like to talk to these guys directly? Particularly Teele, Sreenivasan. I put in interview requests to all of them and most of them did not reply.

Except Yarvan did reply. He wouldn't give me an interview but we went back and forth and he wrote me many, many, long emails. Some of them flattering, some of them insulting, attempting to draw me into some kind of public debate instead of an interview. Finally he realized that all the emails

“were the interview and stopped writing. But they mostly don't want to talk about this stuff. I think”

their goal is to hope that people don't read this book that it just sort of fades away. Nobody cares. Nobody's interested in this deeper story of what's happening with Silicon Valley. But so far over the past year it seems like people are really tuning in to what's happening and people are looking for answers of why has Silicon Valley aligned with Trump? Why does this all seem so extreme? Why aren't there any billionaire standing up and saying, hey, this stuff is wrong. The president shouldn't

be raking in crypto, wealth and destroying the Constitution. I don't think their strategy of silence

Our guest today is Journalist Guild Iran. After a short break we'll hear more about the blogger Curtis Yarvan. I'm Tonya Mosley and this is fresh air. 50 years ago Congress set out to protect coal miners from black lung disease. Today it's back at rates not seen in half a century. These guys are being treated like disposable widgets, not human beings. On the Sunday story, why coal miners and Appalachia are getting sicker faster.

Listen now to the Sunday story from the up first podcast on the NPR app. French fries, tater tots, Colombian ahyaka,

potatoes are beloved everywhere and yet they're always kind of denigrated. There's a long history

of racializing potatoes. Have a potato became an insult around the world. Listen to NPR's code switch podcasts in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Attention, a PSA

“from shorewave and PR science podcast. You need to be paying more attention to your poop.”

I really do think that this deep stigma we have about talking about pooping is tied to these early onset chloractyl cancer cases. What to watch out for and how to decode the secret messages hidden in your poop on shorewave. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. The NPR app cuts through the noise, bringing you local, national, and global coverage.

No paywalls, no profits, no nonsense. Download it in your app store today.

This is fresh air. I'm Tanya Mosley and my guest today is journalist Gil Doran. His new book, The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy, makes the case that a small circle of Silicon Valley billionaires has come to see democracy as an obstacle. And has spent the last 30 years building the argument and the machinery to get around it.

“Doran is a former newspaper reporter who spent 15 years working in democratic politics”

with Diane Feinstein, Jerry Brown, and Kamala Harris before returning to journalism. He now writes the newsletter The Nerd Reich. I just want to spend just a little bit of time on Curtis Yarvin. He was a blogger. It was like the 2000s, right, where he began writing under a pen name, and he was arguing even back then that democracy had failed that America should be run by a CEO who was essentially a dictator and that the entire federal workforce should be fired.

And for years, the only people who really read him were kind of in certain corners of the internet. So how did he and Tiel find each other? In April 2009, Peter Tiel wrote an essay in which he said he no longer believed that freedom and democracy were compatible. And suggested that women and other people getting the right to vote marked the end of freedom being a thing you can have with democracy. At least, of course, as we can see for

white men, he was talking about. Well, this caused a lot of outcry and criticism of Tiel, who had to go back and say, "I didn't mean to say, I'm not saying that women shouldn't have the vote, etc." But one of the people who publicly defended Peter Tiel at that time was Curtis Yarvin, who was writing at the time under the name of Mintious Moldbug. And sometime

“after Yarvin's public defense of Tiel, the two met up, and Tiel becomes an important promoter”

and funder of Yarvin's work, which is very unusual because Curtis Yarvin is this computer programmer.

And he writes these anonymous blogs where he calls basically for the end of the United States

and the end of democracy and the installation of a monarch or a dictator. And the purging of the federal government under a future administration where a president would act as an authoritarian. And no one should have ever heard of Curtis Yarvin's name. But through Tiel, he meets people like Mark Andrewson, who helps fund his company. He has this company trying to remake the internet from scratch. He hasn't quite worked out, but Curtis Yarvin becomes a millionaire and becomes

an important voice in what's known as the tech right. And over time, his word spreads through Silicon Valley and even JD Vance's quoting him before he runs for Senate in podcasts, quoting his ideas specifically for a future president to take power and start acting like a dictator, starting with purging the government of massive amounts of federal employees. Right, this is where I want to slow down because he writes all of this stuff many, many years ago. But then now we are here,

Gill, this idea of rage, which you were just about to talk about, the retire all government

And you write that it isn't, it's not even clear that Trump has ever heard of Curtis Yarvin. So how does a blogger's idea become a federal policy? Through the Silicon Valley donors, they brought those ideas to Washington. Clearly, JD Vance helped bring those ideas to Washington.

“And that was one of those points too, when I think even the establishment press finally realized”

the New York Times and others wrote about this, that the idea we came to know is Doge,

where Elon Musk was installed basically as the CEO over the federal government to cut and purge

and destroy as much of it as possible came from Curtis Yarvin's idea of rage, retire all government employees. And that's in early 2025, Curtis Yarvin becomes an international celebrity because it's so clear that he's the guy behind Doge. In fact, the Washington Post had a story saying that this is the guy behind the Doge idea rage and that even people in the Trump administration had said they'd all read Curtis Yarvin. So these crazy ideas move from the margins of society,

from these random anonymous weirdo blogs on the internet, two federal policy under Donald Trump. Now, Doge didn't really last very long and it ended up collapsing. You really can't have a CEO

ego challenging a president's ego. But that wasn't the only idea that Yarvin had. He had also

suggested that the United States should completely undo its diplomatic standing in the world, stop being the defender of freedom and democracy, and specifically should cut international aid programs. And we saw that happen as well with the USAID cuts, which are predicted to cause millions of unnecessary preventable deaths in the poorest countries in the world. So that's why I think it's important to realize that the weird stuff these guys say in their blogs or in their speeches

is not just eccentric fluff. Because they have so much money, they can turn these weird ideas into

“policy and cause tremendous damage. And I believe that that's what we're seeing now is the”

execution of these bizarre and dangerous ideas on a scale that even I didn't think was imaginable

when all this first started. I think that's the thing. It's kind of hard when there's so many

ideas out there because I went looking for some of Yarvin's writings and it's really hard to tell where his arguments end and really essentially where his trolling begins. For instance, you actually write about an essay where he imagines San Francisco's government replaced by a corporation and then wonders whether the people it deems unproductive in society could then be converted into fuel for city buses. And then he says he's kidding, but you you have decided that these jokes aren't

really jokes because it sounds completely astounding and ridiculous on the face of it. Well, what he says after he says he's kidding is that the idea is that we need a humane alternative

“to genocide for the poor. And I suppose that's what we're seeing in the USAID cuts where we're just going”

to let disease and starvation take away people and in their lives. And so part of what they do is they tell the truth in these long-windeted absurd ways. They tell their truths. They speak their true message. But they slightly disguise it as satire. But now it's become very clear that Yarvin's not joking and that the billionaires who support Curtis Jarvin are not joking. They see their chance to strip away the federal bureaucracy and regulations to end international

aid programs. And to really undermine the very constitutional basis of our government by exerting their authority through crypto and all the things that they say are the things that they do. If you're just joining us, my guest is journalist in author Giel Duran. His new book is called The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy. We'll be back after a short break. This is fresh air.

How will a historically unpopular president navigate a midterm election season that may leave him with a lot less power? Stay caught up with the latest news with Trump's term, the podcast, where we curate NPR's coverage of President Trump and short episodes focused on a single story. Follow Trump's terms on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Are we doomed? Looks at big problems. Nobody would virtually want nuclear war. That's not

wait per wreck. How can we add friction with the launch codes inside somebody's chest cavity

Part of the NPR network. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

“Since the 1970s abortion on screen has been portrayed as either a medical necessity”

or a dangerous decision. On it's been a minute, we discuss how the many depictions of abortion have shifted with the politics of the times. Watch the full it's been a minute episode on YouTube or listen to the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. This is fresh air. I'm Tanya Mosley and my guest is journalist Giel Duran. His new book is The Nerd Reich, Silicon Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy.

I want to break down this fascination with the idea of the network state and what we're actually talking about here. So what is a network state? What does daily life inside of one look like? Well, the most basic definition of a network state according to strenavus and is a community that forms online of like-minded people who then decide to go and

“crowdfund a new territory somewhere and start their own country. And what does life look like in”

a network state? We don't really have an answer to that because not many people spent much time in them. But the idea has manifested in two ways. One, one could say that the tech take over of our current government. It's alignment with Trump is an attempt at the network state idea using their money and influence to take over an existing government and turn it to their purposes. But we also see some projects around the world where they are trying to create new nations.

One of them is in Honduras called Prospera. We're a group of tech billionaires have funded a new settlement that has like a office building and a hotel and some residences which they're trying to develop into a new sovereign territory where the regular usual regulations and laws do an apply. And Tiel has funded this as well as a few others like Sam Altman and Srinivasan.

“And Mark Andreessen through a company called Pronamos Capital. They have a whole company of”

venture capital company that's dedicated to funding these projects around the world. And this is very unpopular in Honduras where the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional and the legislature passed a law saying that these kinds of projects are actually not allowed. So that's one example there's another example called Praxis which is a proposed city also funded by Pronamos capital and a bunch of tech billionaires that was originally going to build a new city somewhere in the

Mediterranean. But after not finding anybody who wanted this tech city in the Mediterranean decided it would be built in Greenland. And this coincided with Trump threatening to take Greenland. In fact, some of these guys went over there in toward Greenland and were making a lot of noise about how if we take Greenland we're going to build this city here. So Trump also has this idea that he proposed in 2023 to build what he calls freedom cities on federal land basically have a competition to see

who wants to build a new city and somebody wins the competition they get federal land to build a new city. So there's this idea that billionaires need to fund the creation of their own cities so that they can govern them as they wish. We've also seen some efforts that seem very similar here in California. California forever is this proposed city in Solano County near San Francisco

where a group of billionaires secretly spent $900 million to buy up 60,000 acres of land

in a place with no water, no infrastructure, no roads and a law that specifically prevents these kinds of projects from being built there. And now they're trying to impose it on the people of Solano County where 70% of voters oppose the project. And some people say well that's not really a network state but the question is why do billionaires suddenly need to build a bunch of cities everywhere? That is the question and also if these cities get built who gets to live in them

and who gets excluded? What is the world that they're trying to build? A world that they fully control. A world where no one can question their authority and a world where they can exclude anyone they don't want they don't like or they don't have anything in common with. They are trying to build new territories from scratch and this is not a new idea. It's occurred throughout history people trying to build new zones and territories where they can escape the regular rules regular

tax etc. The difference is that now instead of just trying to escape taxes or certain laws

they want to build zones to escape democracy altogether. And it's amazing the degree to which

this is openly discussed to the point that there's even a company that's funding these projects

they talk about their plans to create this new world of tech-controlled cities. The president in particular you talked about those freedom cities that he was proposing there were 10 freedom cities built from scratch on federal land as you mentioned a contest for the

best designs and he never really explained why the country needs these new cities instead of

investing in the ones we already have and you make this point that the press that covered the announcement didn't really ask the questions. This idea has kind of moved on but the president has even talked about this is a possibility for Gaza. Definitely one of the places this popped up in the most absurd and shocking way was in Gaza where President Trump posted a video an age-generated video of Trump casino in Gaza on the beach with money raining down and

Elon Musk and this sort of fantasy of a future techno-utopia Gaza and there's a proposal to actually build this thing in Gaza and everywhere you look you're seeing this idea that things will be replaced with new tech billionaire cities in fact there's Gaza some tech billionaires have proposed building a new freedom city at Guadalamo Bay in Cuba when the United States invaded Venezuela and arrested President Maduro someone chimed in and said it's time to build a freedom city in

Venezuela so this idea of freedom cities which are network states keeps recurring and it's not clear whether Trump will actually pull it off we haven't heard a lot about the 10 freedom cities on

“federal land so I think that would be a disaster and he's running out of time to do it but you do see”

some of the most powerful men in the world calling for the creation of these new cities Gaza,

Greenland, Guantanamo, you name it and that's where I think it becomes most clear that they're serious about this these guys not all of them are exactly happy with the Trump administration you write about Curtis Yarvan in particular who says the second Trump revolution is failing and that he has told his allies he plans to leave the country other tech billionaires also have homes and lands and trying to build other cities as you said like in other places what does

that tell us if the architects are also considering packing and leaving up leaving the country Curtis Yarvan is definitely panicking and saying it's time to leave the country but if you look at what he's saying underneath that it's that Trump needs to go further that Trump needs to be full authoritarian, full fascist and make it clear that this is no longer a democracy and that he won't be letting go of power and that if he doesn't do that there will be great

punishment later for everyone who is involved in this so it's an argument for being more extreme in the meantime Peter Teele appears to be taking his advice he recently bought a 12 million dollar mansion in Argentina which and he seems to be spending time there now with his family he

was there for two months now he's returned for another visit so in a weird way you can always see

Teele pointing the direction to where things are going and if Trump doesn't go full authoritarian

“and sees power and keep it then I think a lot of billionaires who participated in this are”

going to be nervous and fearful of the possibility of real accountability and might seek to escape elsewhere bols your screen of us and the network state guy has fled to Singapore and is now planning to start his new nation in Kazakhstan which is an authoritarian country so they might end up this handful of billionaires floating out there looking for something besides the United States. What is it like for you to be immersed in this world? Be writing about it to the degree

with that you're writing about it both on your blog and in this book and you're sitting in some dark things and it sounds like conspiracies to many people who may not be steeped in it. It was tough at first I felt like some people looked at me like I had three heads including some of my friends a lot of my colleagues and journals and people have known for decades who

“knew me when I was the press secretary for every important person in California.”

Didn't even mention to me when I'd be going viral but I feel like I was just a little bit ahead of the curve and other people are now all there and everyone understands what I'm talking about. They're hearing it in other places too and so I just think that I did what I set out to do as a journalist. You know every journalist dream is to find a story that isn't being told and to tell it in time to tell it urgently but I think there's power and hope in being able to explain to people

it to others. Gilderann, thank you for this conversation. Thank you. Gilderann's new book is the

“nerd rike silicon valley fascism and the war on democracy. After a short break, rock critic”

kin Tucker celebrates the 50th anniversary of the soundtrack to the film Sparkle produced by Curtis Mayfield and sung by Arita Franklin. This is fresh air. This week on sources and methods is a Ron trying to hack US water systems. What is it that you can do to potentially quote unquote

scare the American people? Well water is one of those things into necessity of light. We unpack

the week's biggest national security news on sources and methods. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get podcasts. Are we doomed? Looks it? Big problems. Nobody would fashionally want nuclear war. That's not white per wreck. How can we add friction with the launch codes inside somebody's

“chest cavity and you have to kill them to get them out? Are we doomed? Solving humanity's biggest”

threats. Part of the NPR network. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. This is fresh air. Sparkle

is a 1976 movie about a girl group loosely based on the supreme's. The film wasn't a huge hit, but it has a devoted cult following and rock critic kin Tucker says its soundtrack is an eclectic classic. Arita Franklin sings all of the songs on the album which was written and produced by Curtis Mayfield. Kin thinks it includes some of Franklin's finest performances and now

“on its 50th anniversary he offers a fresh appreciation of Sparkle.”

The movie Sparkle follows the troubles and triumphs of a trio of singers trying to make it in the soul music world of the 1960s. Released in 1976 Sparkle was the film debut of Irene Cara, who'd become a big star four years later in the movie fame. The movie was only a modest success and what now seems most impressive about Sparkle are Curtis Mayfield's songs as sung by Arita Franklin, if you're looking to your heart with a positive mind, chase after the story of your

woman and your glory, leave the bad things behind. Everybody's got to rest and do all my love and good days, but for the spices of your life you have got to be the price. If you're no one to be. I'm laughing. I'm going to cry. And I'm home. There was nothing less. I do believe I'm the self. And I won't get it to you baby. That's looking to your heart. A dreamy ballad powered by Arita's passion at singing. As is true of every song here, Franklin is holding nothing back. She's pouring as much of

herself into these Curtis Mayfield compositions as she did in the staggeringly great series of hit singles she made for Atlantic Records in the late 60s. Mayfield was of course familiar with the ways of Hollywood movie music as the man who gave us the theme from the Blacksploitation Film Classic shaft in 1972. For me, Sparkle's high point is Mayfield's five-minute production of "Hooked On Your Love." It begins as a smooth, medium-tempo tune with Arita's vocal gliding atop a glittering string

section and backup vocals by the Kitty Haywood singers.

Then, deeper into it, Franklin gives a demonstration of the song's title. How being hooked,

“addicted to love, becomes an intense craving. Arita's gospel-rooted passion at shouting”

turns out to be the perfect way to convey this ecstatic obsession. ♪ We can't even forget our truth ♪ ♪ With this feeling ♪ ♪ We don't get lost ♪ ♪ The fire has been there ♪

♪ What can I do with this ♪ ♪ The fire has been there ♪ ♪ The fire has been there ♪ ♪ The truth ♪ ♪ With this feeling ♪

♪ The fire has been there ♪

A reath that gives another fantastic performance on the album's first single, a moody sexy number called "Something He Can Feel".

The song went to number one on the R&B chart, but stalled at 28 on the Billboard Pop Chart.

“The album itself barely cracked the top 20 and only briefly at that.”

This is what I mean about sparkle being such an underrated achievement for both Franklin and Mayfield. ♪ I'm interested ♪ ♪ That I'm too young ♪ ♪ To let you know just where I'm from ♪ ♪ Oh, but you will see ♪

♪ There's just a matter of solution ♪ ♪ My love is sure to make it night ♪ ♪ Oh ♪

♪ Everybody around seems so tight ♪

♪ I'm not as strong as I am ♪ ♪ In my brain ♪ ♪ I like the kinds of ways we have our fun ♪ ♪ Here's a loving way send me ♪ ♪ Oh, you know ♪

♪ Yeah ♪ ♪ I'm here, I'm here, I'm here, I'm here ♪ ♪ I'm here, I'm here, I'm here ♪ ♪ I'm here, I'm here, I'm here ♪ As I said earlier, sparkle wasn't a smash in 1976,

but it developed an intense cult following that has reverberations. I don't think it's a coincidence, for instance, that dream girls, a far bigger success in 1981, bears a striking resemblance to sparkle. Sparkle was remade in 2012 starring Jordan Sparks and Whitney Houston, and was a modest hit.

But the collaboration between a Reeth of Franklin and Curtis Mayfield transcends the movie. It stands on its own as a rich, risk-taking collection that deserves a reevaluation in 20th century pop music history. Can Tucker look back at the 50th anniversary of the Sparkle soundtrack, sung by A Reeth of Franklin.

Tomorrow on fresh air, filmmaker Destin Daniel Cretin, his new film, Spider-Man, brand new day, just had the biggest opening weekend in movie history. But before Marvel, he worked in a group home for at-risk teens, an experience that shaped everything he's made since then,

and became the movie short-term 12. I hope you can join us. Fresh air is executive producer, Sam Brigger. Our senior producer today is Roberta Chorock. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham.

Our engineer today is Adam Stanishewski. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Phyllis Myers, and Marie Boltonato, Lauren Prindzel, Theresa Madden, Monique Nazareth, Bay of Challenger, Annabellman, and Nico Gonzalez-Wisler.

Our digital media producer is Molly Sivine Esper, Susan Nakandi, directed today's show, with Terry Gross, Antonia Mosley. [music] Are we doomed? Looks it? Big problems.

Nobody would rationally want nuclear war. But the launch codes inside somebody's chest cavity,

“and you have to kill them to get them out.”

Are we doomed? Solving humanity's biggest threats. Part of the NPR network, listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Dr. Legendary Oscar and Emmy Winning icon, Sally Field,

“about her starring role in the 60's television series, The Flying None.”

I was on a 50-foot crane, and they would climb into the sight of a building.

I'm like Spider-Man.

“Don't miss our full conversation in the rest of our games,”

listen to the wayway Don Tommy podcast on the NPR app,

or wherever you get your podcasts.